i like the actual depiction of this hulk better. But the pacing was terrible. He took forever to turn into the damn hulk! All the non hulk scenes I was pretty much bored to tears.
this hulk is way better cause its more greener den the 2008 one it looks like a green shit hulk n this one gets bigger when hes mad and the other never did
He sounds ridiculous in this movie. He has two voices at the same time that freaking HARMONISE with each other. He keeps yelling and making noises through is nose too, it sounds like he has a cold. Uggghh this movie sucked. (For many more reasons than these)
@Boyle360 Say what you will about this movie, but it easily trumps that god awful 2008 version and its overly stringy-muscled fake looking hulk with quite possibly the corniest final battle I've ever seen.
Holy crap this movie looks like a cheap sci-fi flick compared to today's movies. Crazy how fast technology advances. I remember thinking this movie looked great.
And don't get me started on the story presentation and acting. The story makes much more sense, and it's easier to connect more with the characters because they were carefully and depthly fleshed out. In 2008 Hulk i feel like I wanted to punch Edward Norton and Jennifer Conelly's face. And the way the story is presented feels so rushed and lacking.
Even the main bad guy is better. 2008 Hulk is just some copypasta of Hulk, while Ang Lee's hulk had an indestructible matter manipulator, and the only way for Hulk to beat him was using his limitless Rage
Now take a look at Ang Lee's hulk. It had 3 fights as well, but not only are they better, they even lasts longer. This tank scene above? That was just a part of a long scene where hulk rages out for more than 30 minutes. He wrecked bases, fought tanks, destroyed helicopters and jets, etc.
anyone who thought the 2008 hulk was better than Ang Lee's hulk must be smoking some shit dope.
i don't get how anybody can say 2008 hulk was 'smashier' or 'had more fights' than Ang Lee. The 2008 Hulk had only 3 fights, and even then the first one doesn't even count because Hulk was sitting in the shadows most of the time.
dam :( i wish there were more tanks and soldiers to get their asses ripped apart , never enough action always to little, especially when its my favorite comic character the hulk.... btw this hulk is wayyyyyyy better than the 2008 one. the 2008 version was to short and edward norton does not go with being the hulk in my opinion.
The special effects and hulk's size and power are much better than the second. Unfortunately his design is kinda lame. If they could get the looks from the second movie and make him as big as he is in the first it would be perfect.
can some1 share their opinions on why they might think 2008 hulk is better than 2003? There is so much hate for this movie :( but I think its the better of the two
@vernonasian I don't hate this movie but I do like the 2008 version a little better for a very stupid reason. The 2003 version has no "HULK SMASH!!!" in it as far as I recall :P But seriously, I think the 2008 version has a few more such scenes for the fans to enjoy. Call it fanservice if you want to but the 2008 hulk just reminded me more of the character in the comics (back when the hulk still was a nearly mindless anger monster).
I know that Hulk's pants grow to cover him for expediency's sake, but does someone Eric Bana's size really wear pants that are able to stretch up to size 80?
This one looks more real than the 2008 version; he's not cut enough. The 2008 version looks ready to battle, this one looks ready to cuddle with his girlfriend on the couch...after the fighting is done.
@MrTrollPoster Hard to say, if comic action platform and chick flick had a baby that made it to term, this would be it, but no Hulk fan alive wanted this. For that reason, it was a total screw you to the fans despite its intriguing tone and beauty. So I kept Dare Devil and traded this. I think that speaks volumes. Sometimes I do miss this, but only because of what it looks like, not what it is. I adore my 2008 Hulk purchase; at least I can sit through it.
Neither one is any good. People can't shake hands or get autographs from a piece of CGI, people enjoy Ferrigno the best for that reason. A simple muscle man in green paint and makeup doing things that seem more feasible even if extraordinary, and all the while also something that can be made a lot cheaper and directly for the fans who matter, that was the day.
Not only just painting a muscle man green, but I mean like... why not a suit? Or a little of both? We have Predator, we also have the Jekyll and Hyde from The League Of Extraordinary Gentlemen. Why the hell do they keep needing to waste their money on cgi and know for a fact that no one will like it?
I like the Hulk from 2003, because his movements are better (more realistic). Also, the skin and the body proportions are better. You can really see, how strong he is, his muscles are not too ripped. The Hulk from 2008 has a smaller head and his muscles are low and fat free. The skin looks like rubber and his movements are the same as in a PC game. But: for this, the action of the second movie is better.
@360Gojira. i rather like that.. cause if the make it to much to the comics.. only the nerds and fanatics will understand the movie.. while if they make it entretainment for all the audiance.. it will be better. as faar as i know.. only the fanatics didint like this move much..
@DonChilenito what you are saying does not make any sense, that's like saying the american godzilla remake from 1998 was entertainment for all the audience, whilst the truth is everyone hated it, hell, i know someone who isn't a hulk fan and he hated this movie and liked the 2008 one, you see, adaptations need to be faithful or else people will hate them
@360Gojira. i havent meet anyone who did not like godzilla 98... and everyone did not hate this hulk.. it sold more than expected on dvds.. that means people liked it.. (true fact)
still doesn't change the fact that his ripped pants shrinks with him when he goes back, also when he transforms everything grows bigger (I'm not sure about the brain though) but why does his hair shrink when in hulk and grows when in human
Well... the nice thing about this Hulk is that he's not designed to have mook appeal. Robert Downy's movies have mook appeal. It's a formula for short term, lcd success, unfortunately. People do what they do because it works.
As a former Tanker myself, I'm kinda of insulted at how slow and sluggish they made tanks out to be. They can travel about sixty mph and fired a main gun round every few seconds depending on the speed of the loader. Now, no tank can stop the Hulk of course, but the main gun is covered by a fiberglass sheath that would have been shattering to pieces if the main gun were bent like in the end of that clip. Good clip, but the filmmakers didn't know jack about tanks.
Gotta love The Hulk! Film could've used a little more humor....I remember in one of the hulk comics I read years ago as the Hulk was swinging one of General Ross' tanks into another, smashing the hell out of both he cracked a joke ; "Tanks but no tanks!" Maybe he should've done that here?? Just sayin' :-)
2008 Hulk's face looked incredibly stupid and I could not take that movie seriously. The only good thing about the 08 film was Robert Downey Jr's cameo at the end. This version of the Hulk looks much better and Sam Elliott owns the role of General Ross. William Hurt didn't come close.
Even though some of the hulk movies are good. This is completely unrealistic. After he gets knocked down the 3rd M1Abrams they would already have another 105mm or 120mm round on him.
Even though some of the hulk movies are good. This is completely unrealistic. After he gets knocked down the 3rd M1Abrams would already have another 105mm or 120mm round on him.
ang lee ruined the hulk. hes more like a big ole teddy bear that throws a tantrum then the powerful raging hulk we true hulk fans know and love. he never anything during the whole movie.except in a dream seguence and that was wack. he was quiet like a timid little boy. FUCK U ANG LEE
@veeseee128 the Hulk only fights and causes massive damage to everything around only when he's provoked ..he ultimately wants to be left alone ...if he were to go around tearing everything up and hurting innocent bystanders .that would make him a villian ..
@veeseee128 Hulk also protects the innocent if he has to from being harmed ...Savage HULK with bruce banner seperated from him Is the dangerous killing machine who only knows to destroy everything around him
Hulk was dumbed down in both movies .comic book Hulks strength is equal to superman's when he's angry enough ..for example the tank he swung around and around and threw .it should have flew very far out of view ..and look how he struggling to rip the top off the other tank ..he was pissed off enough from all the bombs and gun fire .
@striderkiwi2 Well, what do you expect then. Do you expect the Hulk do some wrestling moves like Hulk Hogan against some tanks? Do you expect the Hulk break the back of the gamma dogs very easily?
Christoffer Nolan didn't want to put to many actionscenes in his Batmovies because there were no need to have unnecessary pointless actionscenes as Star Wars Prequels in a good story.
I feel that this movie has believeable action and no dumb action ala Michael Bay.
@movienaut after watching it again I kinda take back what I said. The action wasn't bad, but I wouldn't say it's great either. It seems kinda slow. while watching the batman movies, I felt that the action was paced great for each scene. I guess the real problem I have with this movie is that I was bored out of my mind through most of it. This rarely happens to me with movies, even bad ones. Whereas I was never bored watching the batman movies and the newer Hulk movie.
@striderkiwi2 It's about the emotional pain that was held within most of his life and the creation of that psychotic break. This Hulk movie wasn't designed for fans of Michael Bay. It also relates to the comic psyche far better than the second. The second was a vapid take on the TV show.
@fashizze he was standing on a tank, gravity would take care of the situation pretty quickly its not like he was heels down into the ground prepared for the shot.
this is the real hulk as many of you said it needs a little darkening maybe a little bit of greyish. the muscles are correct in structure, and it's movement is realistic to a raging creature acting on pure instinct, it was ang lee doing the hulk and he did an amazing job acting as it. remember the angrier he gets the stronger he gets, and as he is stronger he's body has to increase in size to store that power, but I would have leave at twelve feet. 7, 9, 12
I hated this Hulk he was to big(looked like a bodybuilder) and to light a shade green. The 08 Hulk was true to the comics. Meaner, darker, and rage increased his strength and power not his size! Lol This Hulk was 15 feet tall and 3000 pound! The 08 Hulk was 9 feet 1500 pounds took on an army with ease and kick the abominations ass in one of the best marvel brawls in movie history. He also did the thunder clap and Hulk smash. This movie was to long and boring.
@gungfu777 i liked 03 hulk way better it was based off the comics. they had it right he's supposed to be real Big and muscular hence the name the HULK .2008 hulk was based off the 70's tv series ..he was too short and his muscles were sloppy
The 2008 version was okay, but made the mistake of using CGI that looked "pretty" but not believable. Even for a 7-foot green man throwing tanks around, the whole fun of it is being able to suspend disbelief. This movie had more than a few shots that looked like the Hulk was actually standing there...which was much more satisfying. The 2008 one was also so dark that it was hard to see what was going on at points. The brightness of this one was more enjoyable. I just wish it was faster-paced.
@Zubirrex This Hulk looks like Shrek, man. As has been pointed out.
The '08 version had superior CGI and... pretty much superior everything, really. And if it's a choice between "looking like an XBox game" and looking like Shrek, then I'll take the former. Even if it's not the case.
@Bagheadman Do you even know what real muscle looks like in the human body? and this hulk looks like its actually there. the detail put into this movie is superior to the 08 Action film.
@Bagheadman This is what muscle really looks like. The 08' one looks faker than fake, he looks like the Hulk from that 360 game they made .....no, he looks exactly like that one!
@Bagheadman not defined, ripped out of its freaking mind, it had muscle fibers showing that would pretty much NEVER be shown in the human body. ....unless you had 1% bodyfat. the only muscle that would even show its muscle fibers like the 08 one is the pectorals. And thats if you've got an insane pump while working out your pectorals. Mine barely even do it when Im working out.
@Bagheadman Your hurting my brain with your stupidity "He looks like shrek" is a over-rated and over-stated statement that you used from other comment. The detail that went into this movie exceeds the 08 one. Realisitically the Hulk is very Human in many ways. Why wouldn't he be? hes a Humanoid. Fact is, 03' looks better than the shiny, glossed 08 version
@BenjaminKuruga "Realistically" the Hulk doesn't exist. Now you're just trying too hard. He does look like Shrek. It's overstated because it's true. The detail doesn't exceed the '08 version, because there are scenes where he looks incredibly, incredibly fake.
You went from calling '08 too defined to too "shiny, glossed." You can't even keep a consistent point.
@Bagheadman I agree I was trying to hard like saying realistic and Hulk in the same sentence, but take this scene for example, They were able to make the CGI Hulk interact with the tanks and the battle, and pull it off very well.
@BenjaminKuruga I didn't say the CGI in the '03 film was terrible. The battle scenes were genuinely good, and he was well animated for the vast majority of the film, but '08 was just... better. More definition and shading. Seemed like they put more effort into making him seen tangible.
@Bagheadman I can agree the Effects in that scene were very good, and I did like when he Yelled at the thunder and started tossing shit. I just so much realism in the 03' version, but it was of course the first one i saw. I think the main reaosn it was hated on was just because it wasn't a theater-style movie, and many were dissappointed at the lack of action. but as for effects watch the close to end, Hulk jumps to cali' and goes thru the sewer system, comes out and looks really good.
@BenjaminKuruga Yeah. They needed more scenes like that. But I guess they made the best call. Marvel were pretty gunshy over making another Hulk film that people wouldn't "get", and while the '03 Hulk did have some really interesting character development, it was pretty spotty with the action scenes. If they had to make a choice, it's better to be too plot-driven than to risk things slowing down too much.
And he did look good there, I must say. The dirt and stuff was all rendered really well.
@Bagheadman I guess his interaction with with tanks like weight shifting dust, shadows etc. just really hit me, and yeh, making marvel movies is pretty difficult to pull off without hitting fans in the face somehow.
And in all fairness, the movies by Marvel Studios have been pretty much universally well recieved by fans and critics. The changes they do make tend to be for purposes of sense or better storytelling.
@Bagheadman Well I give the director of this movie a definite thumbs up for his attention to detail with not just the CGI, but with the story as well. /watch?v=dFTPoQe2TFI If that works skip to about 2:00 or so and watch that. Ang Lee did everything in his power and budget to make this movie. The dog fight? he put easily over $1,000,000 or so (Can't remember) into that fight. It was originally meant to last 15 minutes or something, but the budget for the CGI was too low. commentContinued
I think the Dog fight was cool. Fans just didn't like it because they say "Why not abomination? or a super villian? Why dogs?" and even when the Super villian was revealed, fans pestered on saying "Lightning? Stone? Water? STUPID AND GAY" but really look at the final scene ..."Bruce, give me aaaall of your power its mine! I deserve it! .....Then take it ......TAKE IT AAAAAAAAAAALLL" I mean the fact that Bruces father killed his mother in front of him, etc. HULK was Angs veiw and Stan agreed
@Bagheadman Angs veiw was a more in depth experience with over-the-top realism. I rewatch this scene every week or so, and I say damn ....Michael bay sucks .... but Ang showed what was going on in Bruces mind. Like when the Hulk landed before this fight, it was in front of Bruces old house. The HULK actually shared memories, but Bruce wanted nothing to do with HULK and HULK wanted nothing to do with a "Puny Human" ~HULK. I just over-all love this movie. Ang even fit the story of betty in there:)
@miklitov23 This one more agressive? seriously did you not watch this movie the hulk in this one wasn't really all that destructive and when he was fighing the amy a bit later on after this scene he just looked like he was tired and just not into it and they mostly owned him. I think this hulk had a better look but the new one was agressive amd felt more like the hulk should be.
@j04370859 I think this hulk looked much more bulkier than the 2008 one but I prefer the destruction and aggresion the 2008 one showed, this version as shown in this cutscene seemed more like an innocent animal considering all those close ups of his eyes, he seemed to be tired more often and not the unstoppable restless monster he is in the comics. I think they should use this version of the Hulk but make his muscles more profound instead of just making him look slightly fat but bulky.
@TheBoredomOtaku The director, Wanted a more in-depth story, on Bruces Sub-concious<(sorry for spelling) and concious mind. He wanted emotiond to be involved, the 08 was a quick, action flick for normal people.
@BenjaminKuruga I liked both films but I felt each focused on only one aspect of the Hulk each, this one focused more on Bruce's struggle and the fact the Hulk deep down just wants left alone, the other one focused more on the Hulk being this unstoppable force that was the results of nuclear experimentaion and the horrors and destruction of nuclear technology. If they manage
i like the actual depiction of this hulk better. But the pacing was terrible. He took forever to turn into the damn hulk! All the non hulk scenes I was pretty much bored to tears.
rumbler227 19 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have another hulk out over on my page including a rampage that follows the hulkout, im not lying its pretty sick!
ChadTheWrestleManiac 5 days ago
I LOVE WHEN HE BENDS THE TANK GUN TO DUDES FACE AND DUDES LIKE
Soldier:[pees self]
CoolKodyP 1 week ago
this hulk is way better cause its more greener den the 2008 one it looks like a green shit hulk n this one gets bigger when hes mad and the other never did
crazy8adv3ntures 3 weeks ago
He sounds ridiculous in this movie. He has two voices at the same time that freaking HARMONISE with each other. He keeps yelling and making noises through is nose too, it sounds like he has a cold. Uggghh this movie sucked. (For many more reasons than these)
Boyle360 3 weeks ago
@Boyle360 Just a movie.
TheREALforeverone 3 weeks ago
@TheREALforeverone There's no such thing as JUST a movie. This is a bad movie.
Boyle360 3 weeks ago
@Boyle360 Say what you will about this movie, but it easily trumps that god awful 2008 version and its overly stringy-muscled fake looking hulk with quite possibly the corniest final battle I've ever seen.
timjones066 2 weeks ago
you to can do this after 12 mins of working out with the shake weight.
RogueDingo 1 month ago
Comment removed
RogueDingo 1 month ago
Omg what incredible strength
jhoodman561 1 month ago
those are some fine special effects from 2003.
07foxmulder 1 month ago
@07foxmulder Yeah I can't believe how good this looks for 2003. Really curious what company did the CGI for this
timjones066 2 weeks ago
modernwarfare just got assraped
RECKOGNING1 1 month ago
0:44 :(
scaryhorrorfreak 1 month ago
Comment removed
scaryhorrorfreak 1 month ago
0:36 YEAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!
scaryhorrorfreak 1 month ago
damn if you have 100 Hulks u are the king of the world
xGoodLookinBoyx 1 month ago
@xGoodLookinBoyx 2 is enough
the47alex 3 weeks ago
This is, without a doubt, one of the funniest things I've ever seen in my entire life.
thunderhead777 1 month ago
This was the best Hulk ! And that's funny when he's like "AAAARRRR" haha but nice I loved that scene
joeytheflash 1 month ago
the hulk goes smashing one by one hurrah hurrah
hippie1138 1 month ago
I absolutely loved this Hulk, while his origin was different the Hulk itself is the most accurate we are ever going to get to the source material.
Sure this version isnt as detailed as the 2008 Hulk, but this one moved so much more realistically and blended in better with the enviroment.
KnightSparhawk 1 month ago
I used to be able to beat the shit out of tanks just like this... until I took an arrow to the knee
Soaringeagle78 1 month ago
0:36 YEAAAAAAH
0:42 GET OUT OF TANK.
1:05 TRY TO BLOW ME UP WILL YOU!!!
1:19 Didnt think so
0:45 Oh Shit BOOM
aidanplastation3 1 month ago
Holy crap this movie looks like a cheap sci-fi flick compared to today's movies. Crazy how fast technology advances. I remember thinking this movie looked great.
neoc03 1 month ago
(continued)
And don't get me started on the story presentation and acting. The story makes much more sense, and it's easier to connect more with the characters because they were carefully and depthly fleshed out. In 2008 Hulk i feel like I wanted to punch Edward Norton and Jennifer Conelly's face. And the way the story is presented feels so rushed and lacking.
dakwahgandist 2 months ago
@dakwahgandist i thought i am the only one thinking 2003 hulk was better than 2008.completely agreed with you man.
Chomolongma93 2 months ago
(continued)
Even the main bad guy is better. 2008 Hulk is just some copypasta of Hulk, while Ang Lee's hulk had an indestructible matter manipulator, and the only way for Hulk to beat him was using his limitless Rage
dakwahgandist 2 months ago
(continued)
Now take a look at Ang Lee's hulk. It had 3 fights as well, but not only are they better, they even lasts longer. This tank scene above? That was just a part of a long scene where hulk rages out for more than 30 minutes. He wrecked bases, fought tanks, destroyed helicopters and jets, etc.
dakwahgandist 2 months ago
anyone who thought the 2008 hulk was better than Ang Lee's hulk must be smoking some shit dope.
i don't get how anybody can say 2008 hulk was 'smashier' or 'had more fights' than Ang Lee. The 2008 Hulk had only 3 fights, and even then the first one doesn't even count because Hulk was sitting in the shadows most of the time.
dakwahgandist 2 months ago 3
dam :( i wish there were more tanks and soldiers to get their asses ripped apart , never enough action always to little, especially when its my favorite comic character the hulk.... btw this hulk is wayyyyyyy better than the 2008 one. the 2008 version was to short and edward norton does not go with being the hulk in my opinion.
Xoerite 2 months ago
The special effects and hulk's size and power are much better than the second. Unfortunately his design is kinda lame. If they could get the looks from the second movie and make him as big as he is in the first it would be perfect.
Franklinms 2 months ago
Desepticons tanks vs Hulk :D
HanzelkaDC 2 months ago
can some1 share their opinions on why they might think 2008 hulk is better than 2003? There is so much hate for this movie :( but I think its the better of the two
vernonasian 2 months ago
@vernonasian I don't hate this movie but I do like the 2008 version a little better for a very stupid reason. The 2003 version has no "HULK SMASH!!!" in it as far as I recall :P But seriously, I think the 2008 version has a few more such scenes for the fans to enjoy. Call it fanservice if you want to but the 2008 hulk just reminded me more of the character in the comics (back when the hulk still was a nearly mindless anger monster).
tuschman168 2 months ago
My opinion: 00:58 - 01:12 = Best "beat the shit outta something" scene in movie history!! XD
Dalekster 2 months ago
you think the soldiers in the remaining tanks stay alive?
MrShapiroman 3 months ago
I know that Hulk's pants grow to cover him for expediency's sake, but does someone Eric Bana's size really wear pants that are able to stretch up to size 80?
spiritof78 3 months ago
what is that broom ganan do or shuld i say tank wich is not a tank! THE ONLY TANK I SEE IS THE GREEN THING AND HIS NAME IS!!! (HULK!)
boxcuber 3 months ago
Man..that sob jus ripped a tank apart..hmm yep definitely don't wanna piss him off..
17VINCE 3 months ago
I feel like this at work sometimes...(in the post office!);-)
mrthundaboots 3 months ago
1:29 hey dude, i think you should hold your fire.
Hornsterio 3 months ago
1:02
Executioner mode (RE5)
alissonsaggi 3 months ago
We Need The Hulk In Iraq And Afgan
DJRizzyHTID 3 months ago
This one looks more real than the 2008 version; he's not cut enough. The 2008 version looks ready to battle, this one looks ready to cuddle with his girlfriend on the couch...after the fighting is done.
ignominni 3 months ago 9
@ignominni ... Do you hate this one or not? You kinda switched your opinions in the middle...
MrTrollPoster 2 months ago 2
@MrTrollPoster Hard to say, if comic action platform and chick flick had a baby that made it to term, this would be it, but no Hulk fan alive wanted this. For that reason, it was a total screw you to the fans despite its intriguing tone and beauty. So I kept Dare Devil and traded this. I think that speaks volumes. Sometimes I do miss this, but only because of what it looks like, not what it is. I adore my 2008 Hulk purchase; at least I can sit through it.
ignominni 2 months ago
@ignominni Haha yeah. Daredevil was good.
MrTrollPoster 2 months ago
@ignominni
Neither one is any good. People can't shake hands or get autographs from a piece of CGI, people enjoy Ferrigno the best for that reason. A simple muscle man in green paint and makeup doing things that seem more feasible even if extraordinary, and all the while also something that can be made a lot cheaper and directly for the fans who matter, that was the day.
sethmanrockandroll 2 months ago
@sethmanrockandroll liking old school is all fine and good, but that's a bit too far in my opinion
refinedfriend 2 months ago
@refinedfriend
Not only just painting a muscle man green, but I mean like... why not a suit? Or a little of both? We have Predator, we also have the Jekyll and Hyde from The League Of Extraordinary Gentlemen. Why the hell do they keep needing to waste their money on cgi and know for a fact that no one will like it?
sethmanrockandroll 2 months ago
@sethmanrockandroll Cause a suit would look like shit, and many people do like it. Not to be inflammatory or anything. . .
refinedfriend 2 months ago
@ignominni in this movie all the cuts instantly heal.
cardude1992 2 months ago
@cardude1992 I mean cuts as in muscle definition. :-)
ignominni 2 months ago
Bruce, buddy, you seem upset. Something bothering you?
albee1000 4 months ago
He was about to tell Hulk:
"You're making me angry. You won't like me when......."
BlackDynamiteNYC 4 months ago
Even though this movie bored people I still think its better than the 2008.
Had story than the 2008 one.
Also
Love Hulk in this one. c:
ItsTalegas 4 months ago 2
I like the Hulk from 2003, because his movements are better (more realistic). Also, the skin and the body proportions are better. You can really see, how strong he is, his muscles are not too ripped. The Hulk from 2008 has a smaller head and his muscles are low and fat free. The skin looks like rubber and his movements are the same as in a PC game. But: for this, the action of the second movie is better.
MegaSmud 4 months ago
@MegaSmud I agree, except in your last statement.
octopusmagnificens 4 months ago
0:15 Never ever.
MegaSmud 4 months ago
1:17 HEY GUYS I THINK WE SHOULD FIR-
1:19 Nope...
BrandonS1994 4 months ago 22
@BrandonS1994 NOBODY EVER THINKS ANYTHING!! THERE IS ONLY THOUGHTLESSNESS!!!
thesuperbeast46 2 weeks ago
HE SHOULD DO THE HAMMER THROW IN THE OLYMPICS!!!!!!!
WeirdoJames 4 months ago
Ever been so angry you tore up a tank?
WarriorofCathar 4 months ago
hulks roars seemed to be warped
MrPuddlejam 5 months ago
Hulk 2008 was a better movie, but this is the best scene in either movie.
MrThePandaman 5 months ago
my god, this is the most retarded tank destruction scene i have ever saw
360Gojira 5 months ago
@360Gojira. so what is a destruction scene for you? Nuke explosions?
DonChilenito 5 months ago
@DonChilenito no, it is because the hulk is not acting like hulk, he is acting like king kong
360Gojira 5 months ago
@360Gojira. i rather like that.. cause if the make it to much to the comics.. only the nerds and fanatics will understand the movie.. while if they make it entretainment for all the audiance.. it will be better. as faar as i know.. only the fanatics didint like this move much..
DonChilenito 5 months ago
@DonChilenito what you are saying does not make any sense, that's like saying the american godzilla remake from 1998 was entertainment for all the audience, whilst the truth is everyone hated it, hell, i know someone who isn't a hulk fan and he hated this movie and liked the 2008 one, you see, adaptations need to be faithful or else people will hate them
360Gojira 5 months ago
@360Gojira. i havent meet anyone who did not like godzilla 98... and everyone did not hate this hulk.. it sold more than expected on dvds.. that means people liked it.. (true fact)
DonChilenito 5 months ago
@DonChilenito okay, well, by everyone I mean a lot of people, they might have broken the dvd, but all of it is a matter of opinion
360Gojira 5 months ago
@DonChilenito Then you obviously have not met any real Godzilla fans.
SporeGoji 5 months ago
0:10 0:23 la mejor parte :)
fulgore256 5 months ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, THE LAST PART, THE FACE OF SOLDIER HAHAHAHA...
MiguelLemosTv 5 months ago
still doesn't change the fact that his ripped pants shrinks with him when he goes back, also when he transforms everything grows bigger (I'm not sure about the brain though) but why does his hair shrink when in hulk and grows when in human
756Rasengan 5 months ago
Well... the nice thing about this Hulk is that he's not designed to have mook appeal. Robert Downy's movies have mook appeal. It's a formula for short term, lcd success, unfortunately. People do what they do because it works.
ion010101 5 months ago
As a former Tanker myself, I'm kinda of insulted at how slow and sluggish they made tanks out to be. They can travel about sixty mph and fired a main gun round every few seconds depending on the speed of the loader. Now, no tank can stop the Hulk of course, but the main gun is covered by a fiberglass sheath that would have been shattering to pieces if the main gun were bent like in the end of that clip. Good clip, but the filmmakers didn't know jack about tanks.
brivanas 5 months ago
@brivanas Ang probably didn't think about it too much, but as for realism and physics, he got that spot on. I take your word for it though.
BenjaminKuruga 5 months ago
If the 2008 Hulk was as strong and could jump like the 2003 Hulk, the film would have been that much better.
LegionOf3 5 months ago
@LegionOf3 agreed. they lowered his power level. This hulk was truer in the sense that the more pissed he gets the more powerful he gets.
thomas007 5 months ago
@thomas007 well, Stan never wrote that he couldn't get Bigger.
BenjaminKuruga 5 months ago
@thomas007 but you have to agree, hulk travelling to san francisco the way bugs bunny does it is really retarded
360Gojira 5 months ago
Gotta love The Hulk! Film could've used a little more humor....I remember in one of the hulk comics I read years ago as the Hulk was swinging one of General Ross' tanks into another, smashing the hell out of both he cracked a joke ; "Tanks but no tanks!" Maybe he should've done that here?? Just sayin' :-)
whyyyyou 5 months ago
2008 Hulk's face looked incredibly stupid and I could not take that movie seriously. The only good thing about the 08 film was Robert Downey Jr's cameo at the end. This version of the Hulk looks much better and Sam Elliott owns the role of General Ross. William Hurt didn't come close.
cognacholiday 5 months ago
Even though some of the hulk movies are good. This is completely unrealistic. After he gets knocked down the 3rd M1Abrams they would already have another 105mm or 120mm round on him.
t2commander 5 months ago
Even though some of the hulk movies are good. This is completely unrealistic. After he gets knocked down the 3rd M1Abrams would already have another 105mm or 120mm round on him.
t2commander 5 months ago
nope the 2003 is bigger, stonger, and will smoke the 08 version in running
godzillamaster20001 5 months ago 26
@godzillamaster20001 nope they will become brothers and fuck up everyone in there way
MrNaru210 3 months ago
@godzillamaster20001
Stronger? He gets hurt and grunts in this clip after being hit by a tank shell. It wouldn't budge Superman, even.
regelemihai 3 months ago
i bet the guy at the end of the clip in the tank was like "dont fire" to the other guy
krisaf778 5 months ago
The Incredible Hulk is better then this movie. The design of the Hulk is better in The Incredible Hulk and Edward Norton :)
lalaxbo 5 months ago
Comment removed
lalaxbo 5 months ago
0:55 oh shit my sternum
goo5976 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I thought this film was much underrated.
Mercuryrules 5 months ago in playlist hulk-2003 beats up the tanks
Oh, man, that tank demolition derby really makes me wanna go workout. And I do.
Superegio42 6 months ago in playlist THE HULK VS ARMY TANKS
who just wish they could have been the Hulk back in grade school and middle school ..nobody would fuck with you
fashizze 6 months ago
I still think Edward Norton was a better Bruce Banner.
harry426 6 months ago
@harry426 yeah but 03 Hulk was a better HULK
fashizze 6 months ago
ang lee ruined the hulk. hes more like a big ole teddy bear that throws a tantrum then the powerful raging hulk we true hulk fans know and love. he never anything during the whole movie.except in a dream seguence and that was wack. he was quiet like a timid little boy. FUCK U ANG LEE
veeseee128 6 months ago
@veeseee128 the Hulk only fights and causes massive damage to everything around only when he's provoked ..he ultimately wants to be left alone ...if he were to go around tearing everything up and hurting innocent bystanders .that would make him a villian ..
fashizze 6 months ago
@veeseee128 Hulk also protects the innocent if he has to from being harmed ...Savage HULK with bruce banner seperated from him Is the dangerous killing machine who only knows to destroy everything around him
fashizze 6 months ago
Hulk was dumbed down in both movies .comic book Hulks strength is equal to superman's when he's angry enough ..for example the tank he swung around and around and threw .it should have flew very far out of view ..and look how he struggling to rip the top off the other tank ..he was pissed off enough from all the bombs and gun fire .
fashizze 6 months ago
Hulk's growl sounds like an angry curious george
Timehn36k9voc 6 months ago
@XCmKX418 lmfaoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
goo5976 6 months ago
jesus christ.
goo5976 6 months ago
I grew up reading these comic books..and I imagined him just like that when he is angry. I never tire of watching this scene.
grindcoredome 6 months ago
@ 1:28 i would shit my pants if i was that soldier
DarthEvolved 6 months ago
not even the fight scenes in 2003 are good. oh well
striderkiwi2 6 months ago
@striderkiwi2 Well, what do you expect then. Do you expect the Hulk do some wrestling moves like Hulk Hogan against some tanks? Do you expect the Hulk break the back of the gamma dogs very easily?
Christoffer Nolan didn't want to put to many actionscenes in his Batmovies because there were no need to have unnecessary pointless actionscenes as Star Wars Prequels in a good story.
I feel that this movie has believeable action and no dumb action ala Michael Bay.
movienaut 6 months ago
@movienaut after watching it again I kinda take back what I said. The action wasn't bad, but I wouldn't say it's great either. It seems kinda slow. while watching the batman movies, I felt that the action was paced great for each scene. I guess the real problem I have with this movie is that I was bored out of my mind through most of it. This rarely happens to me with movies, even bad ones. Whereas I was never bored watching the batman movies and the newer Hulk movie.
striderkiwi2 6 months ago
@striderkiwi2 It's about the emotional pain that was held within most of his life and the creation of that psychotic break. This Hulk movie wasn't designed for fans of Michael Bay. It also relates to the comic psyche far better than the second. The second was a vapid take on the TV show.
Energyone 6 months ago
0:50 for all the Hulks strength i dont see how cannon fire would knock him down...maybe knock him back a few feet .but thats it
fashizze 6 months ago
@fashizze he was standing on a tank, gravity would take care of the situation pretty quickly its not like he was heels down into the ground prepared for the shot.
TableTennis1231 6 months ago
do you have the scene where hulk was fighting the helicopters?
HPAVELOW53 6 months ago
1:26 Go ahead. Shoot now.
SciFiWebcam 6 months ago
this is the real hulk as many of you said it needs a little darkening maybe a little bit of greyish. the muscles are correct in structure, and it's movement is realistic to a raging creature acting on pure instinct, it was ang lee doing the hulk and he did an amazing job acting as it. remember the angrier he gets the stronger he gets, and as he is stronger he's body has to increase in size to store that power, but I would have leave at twelve feet. 7, 9, 12
TheForastero8 6 months ago
What a BADASS!
boas123ful 7 months ago
I hated this Hulk he was to big(looked like a bodybuilder) and to light a shade green. The 08 Hulk was true to the comics. Meaner, darker, and rage increased his strength and power not his size! Lol This Hulk was 15 feet tall and 3000 pound! The 08 Hulk was 9 feet 1500 pounds took on an army with ease and kick the abominations ass in one of the best marvel brawls in movie history. He also did the thunder clap and Hulk smash. This movie was to long and boring.
gungfu777 7 months ago
@gungfu777 i liked 03 hulk way better it was based off the comics. they had it right he's supposed to be real Big and muscular hence the name the HULK .2008 hulk was based off the 70's tv series ..he was too short and his muscles were sloppy
fashizze 6 months ago
Fruit of the BOOM shorts: one size fits all, regardless of if you mutate into a green monster.
Snoofalah 7 months ago 2
You don't fuck with the Hulk
YYYxEEE 7 months ago
The 2008 version was okay, but made the mistake of using CGI that looked "pretty" but not believable. Even for a 7-foot green man throwing tanks around, the whole fun of it is being able to suspend disbelief. This movie had more than a few shots that looked like the Hulk was actually standing there...which was much more satisfying. The 2008 one was also so dark that it was hard to see what was going on at points. The brightness of this one was more enjoyable. I just wish it was faster-paced.
EGarrett01 7 months ago 2
the hulk looks more like the original in this one but the newer one is still badass
ttgrockster 7 months ago
i think this is the best scene and very emotional moment in the movie
volhara2 7 months ago
This is still superior to the 08 version. That looked like they used the Doom 3 game engine to render.
Zubirrex 7 months ago 28
@Zubirrex The Hulk looks like fucking Shrek in this version.
greensucksbluerules 7 months ago
@Zubirrex What the Hell are you talking about? The '08 version is far better. Don't be daft.
Bagheadman 5 months ago
@Bagheadman What the hell are you talking about? 2008 Hulk looked like an Xbox game.
Zubirrex 5 months ago
@Zubirrex This Hulk looks like Shrek, man. As has been pointed out.
The '08 version had superior CGI and... pretty much superior everything, really. And if it's a choice between "looking like an XBox game" and looking like Shrek, then I'll take the former. Even if it's not the case.
Bagheadman 5 months ago
@Bagheadman Do you even know what real muscle looks like in the human body? and this hulk looks like its actually there. the detail put into this movie is superior to the 08 Action film.
BenjaminKuruga 5 months ago
@BenjaminKuruga He looks like Shrek, man. The '08 Hulk has muscle detail. This one looks like a cartoon.
Bagheadman 5 months ago
@Bagheadman This is what muscle really looks like. The 08' one looks faker than fake, he looks like the Hulk from that 360 game they made .....no, he looks exactly like that one!
BenjaminKuruga 5 months ago 2
@BenjaminKuruga If you think that's what real muscle looks like, then you must not see very much of it.
Bagheadman 5 months ago
@Bagheadman Dude I have muscle, I've worked out for 3 years now. I know what it looks like. 08' is WAY to cut.
BenjaminKuruga 5 months ago
@BenjaminKuruga Sure you do. And you just admitted the '08 had more defined muscle. Well done.
Bagheadman 5 months ago
@Bagheadman not defined, ripped out of its freaking mind, it had muscle fibers showing that would pretty much NEVER be shown in the human body. ....unless you had 1% bodyfat. the only muscle that would even show its muscle fibers like the 08 one is the pectorals. And thats if you've got an insane pump while working out your pectorals. Mine barely even do it when Im working out.
BenjaminKuruga 5 months ago
@BenjaminKuruga ... he's the Hulk. Not a human.
You're stupid.
Bagheadman 5 months ago
@Bagheadman 03' is still more realistic than the 08' ....and to add,
You're also stupid.
BenjaminKuruga 5 months ago
@BenjaminKuruga No, man, I'm smart. I destroyed your argument and made you admit you're stupid.
Since you're judging Hulk as looking "human" (whatever the fuck that means) you're already coming from a position of illogic.
Bagheadman 5 months ago
@Bagheadman Your hurting my brain with your stupidity "He looks like shrek" is a over-rated and over-stated statement that you used from other comment. The detail that went into this movie exceeds the 08 one. Realisitically the Hulk is very Human in many ways. Why wouldn't he be? hes a Humanoid. Fact is, 03' looks better than the shiny, glossed 08 version
BenjaminKuruga 5 months ago
@BenjaminKuruga "Realistically" the Hulk doesn't exist. Now you're just trying too hard. He does look like Shrek. It's overstated because it's true. The detail doesn't exceed the '08 version, because there are scenes where he looks incredibly, incredibly fake.
You went from calling '08 too defined to too "shiny, glossed." You can't even keep a consistent point.
Bagheadman 5 months ago
@Bagheadman I agree I was trying to hard like saying realistic and Hulk in the same sentence, but take this scene for example, They were able to make the CGI Hulk interact with the tanks and the battle, and pull it off very well.
BenjaminKuruga 5 months ago
@BenjaminKuruga I didn't say the CGI in the '03 film was terrible. The battle scenes were genuinely good, and he was well animated for the vast majority of the film, but '08 was just... better. More definition and shading. Seemed like they put more effort into making him seen tangible.
The scene with Hulk in the cave stands to mind.
Bagheadman 5 months ago
@Bagheadman I can agree the Effects in that scene were very good, and I did like when he Yelled at the thunder and started tossing shit. I just so much realism in the 03' version, but it was of course the first one i saw. I think the main reaosn it was hated on was just because it wasn't a theater-style movie, and many were dissappointed at the lack of action. but as for effects watch the close to end, Hulk jumps to cali' and goes thru the sewer system, comes out and looks really good.
BenjaminKuruga 5 months ago
@BenjaminKuruga Yeah. They needed more scenes like that. But I guess they made the best call. Marvel were pretty gunshy over making another Hulk film that people wouldn't "get", and while the '03 Hulk did have some really interesting character development, it was pretty spotty with the action scenes. If they had to make a choice, it's better to be too plot-driven than to risk things slowing down too much.
And he did look good there, I must say. The dirt and stuff was all rendered really well.
Bagheadman 5 months ago
@Bagheadman I guess his interaction with with tanks like weight shifting dust, shadows etc. just really hit me, and yeh, making marvel movies is pretty difficult to pull off without hitting fans in the face somehow.
BenjaminKuruga 5 months ago
@BenjaminKuruga That stuff was all really well factored in.
And in all fairness, the movies by Marvel Studios have been pretty much universally well recieved by fans and critics. The changes they do make tend to be for purposes of sense or better storytelling.
Bagheadman 5 months ago
@Bagheadman Well I give the director of this movie a definite thumbs up for his attention to detail with not just the CGI, but with the story as well. /watch?v=dFTPoQe2TFI If that works skip to about 2:00 or so and watch that. Ang Lee did everything in his power and budget to make this movie. The dog fight? he put easily over $1,000,000 or so (Can't remember) into that fight. It was originally meant to last 15 minutes or something, but the budget for the CGI was too low. commentContinued
BenjaminKuruga 5 months ago
I think the Dog fight was cool. Fans just didn't like it because they say "Why not abomination? or a super villian? Why dogs?" and even when the Super villian was revealed, fans pestered on saying "Lightning? Stone? Water? STUPID AND GAY" but really look at the final scene ..."Bruce, give me aaaall of your power its mine! I deserve it! .....Then take it ......TAKE IT AAAAAAAAAAALLL" I mean the fact that Bruces father killed his mother in front of him, etc. HULK was Angs veiw and Stan agreed
BenjaminKuruga 5 months ago
@Bagheadman Angs veiw was a more in depth experience with over-the-top realism. I rewatch this scene every week or so, and I say damn ....Michael bay sucks .... but Ang showed what was going on in Bruces mind. Like when the Hulk landed before this fight, it was in front of Bruces old house. The HULK actually shared memories, but Bruce wanted nothing to do with HULK and HULK wanted nothing to do with a "Puny Human" ~HULK. I just over-all love this movie. Ang even fit the story of betty in there:)
BenjaminKuruga 5 months ago
it is awesome scene
volhara2 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i love this scene
volhara2 7 months ago in playlist hulk-2003 beats up the tanks
Comment removed
volhara2 7 months ago in playlist hulk-2003 beats up the tanks
Comment removed
volhara2 7 months ago in playlist hulk-2003 beats up the tanks
Comment removed
volhara2 7 months ago in playlist hulk-2003 beats up the tanks
Comment removed
volhara2 7 months ago in playlist hulk-2003 beats up the tanks
Comment removed
volhara2 7 months ago in playlist hulk-2003 beats up the tanks
Imagine, if Hulk would take steroids.
MegaSmud 7 months ago 2
hulk sound stupid
dragon66066 7 months ago
no this hulk is gay.....trust me
BoHoVsGolf 8 months ago
Obviously this Hulk is way, way stronger than the 2008 Hulk, and bigger in the same way.
Flash11I19 8 months ago
the 2008 hulk was way better
HarveyDent13 8 months ago
This Hulk looks a lot better but I never really liked how they filmed it. Felt like a comic book. And most of the time the dialogue was boring.
allfatz 8 months ago
9 people are 2008 hulk fans
lote1234567891011 8 months ago
Always loved the blast at 0:49, very cool!!
tommyt1971 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
0:34 i like how the tank fired and the makers still took the time to put the faint explosion in the background. look for it. it's hella small!
brandeezy108 8 months ago
Comment removed
brandeezy108 8 months ago
This was a superior movie, but you could tell Ang Lee was pressed for time.
ion010101 8 months ago
dude the cgi is amazing for 2003
wellstone1990 8 months ago
This one's way better than 2008 this one's more raw agressive and destructive
miklitov23 8 months ago
@miklitov23 This one more agressive? seriously did you not watch this movie the hulk in this one wasn't really all that destructive and when he was fighing the amy a bit later on after this scene he just looked like he was tired and just not into it and they mostly owned him. I think this hulk had a better look but the new one was agressive amd felt more like the hulk should be.
j04370859 8 months ago
@j04370859 I think this hulk looked much more bulkier than the 2008 one but I prefer the destruction and aggresion the 2008 one showed, this version as shown in this cutscene seemed more like an innocent animal considering all those close ups of his eyes, he seemed to be tired more often and not the unstoppable restless monster he is in the comics. I think they should use this version of the Hulk but make his muscles more profound instead of just making him look slightly fat but bulky.
TheBoredomOtaku 7 months ago 10
@TheBoredomOtaku The director, Wanted a more in-depth story, on Bruces Sub-concious<(sorry for spelling) and concious mind. He wanted emotiond to be involved, the 08 was a quick, action flick for normal people.
BenjaminKuruga 5 months ago
@BenjaminKuruga I liked both films but I felt each focused on only one aspect of the Hulk each, this one focused more on Bruce's struggle and the fact the Hulk deep down just wants left alone, the other one focused more on the Hulk being this unstoppable force that was the results of nuclear experimentaion and the horrors and destruction of nuclear technology. If they manage