Why does one assume that the veterans, soldiers and Marines who date foreign women online have no social skills? Why does one assume that the executives who can afford to travel on international business don't date the women overseas when they travel or live overseas as expats? Why does one assume that IMBRA just makes things more "difficult" when the reality is that it makes it completely impossible to meet women who don't have email?
As of today, Brownback's campaign has 49 YouTube videos, but he doesn't talk about his horrifying 'Int'l Romance Regulation Act' on any. Why is he avoiding this issue that he feels so strongly about (criminalizing int'l relationships)? Is now ashamed for partnering with radical Bahai feminists Tahirh Justice Center? He told his colleagues in the Senate that they are "front-line experts". They are experts in FRAUD, DECEPTION, PROPAGANDA, COOKED STATISTICS, and MANUFACTURED HYSTERIA.
Senator Brownback's pathetic 'Intl Romance Regulation Act' was concocted to support the radical feminist Bahai religous view of equality. The proponents of this bizarre legislation manufactured a problem to support their own agenda. There has NEVER been a single conviction for 'human trafficking' involving an American-owned introduction or penpal service. Brownback is a gullible man who partnered with the wacko proponents of this Marxist / Facist law.
I heard he opposed habeas corpus being restored.This is unacceptable.I was raised catholic and would not begin to vote for someone who thinks this way-It is backward, regressive and without habeas corpus it is oppressive.
upcon, I haven't heard that or seen any references to that statement. That does not mean it's not true, I just haven't heard whether he's for or against it.
upcon, I would be against it. Habeas Corpus Restoration Act of 2007- Repeals provisions of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 that eliminated the jurisdiction of any court to hear or consider applications for a writ of habeas corpus filed by aliens who have been determined by the United States to have been properly detained as enemy combatants
(or who are awaiting such determination) and actions against the United States relating to the detention of such aliens and to military commissions (thus restoring habeas corpus rights existing prior to the enactment of such Act).
Allows courts to hear or consider legal challenges to military commissions only as provided by the Code of Military Justice or by a habeas corpus proceeding.
The International Romance Regulation act apparently was sponsored by Brownback working in secret with Senator Cantwell (D-Wa an ultra liberal. The law unfairly labels American men who are dating foreign women as "premedidated torturers" and wife beaters in spite of a 1999 INS report showing these "International Marriages" have an abuse rate of less than 1%. Senator Brownback you are a hypocrite. Your romance law is designed to regulate (PREVENT )marriages between law abiding couples.
The law you are referring to is to protect women. Or maybe you thinks it's okay to abuse war brides or mail-order-brides. Maybe you think they're property.
"Practicing catholic": the term "mail order bride" is a derogatory term and brides don't arrive by mail. While the promoters of the romance law claim it's "to protect women"... The truth reveals these Non government organizations have a vested interest and used moral panic to get gullible legislators like Senator Brownback to sponsor the romance law to enhance their federally funded cottage industry getting sympathy from politicians to donate money (Grants) for their "manufactured problem"
"practicingcatholic". The Imigration and Naturalization Service found the abuse rate of International marriages (Foreign women who met their American husbands via the internet)at a mere 1% ... seven times less than the abuse rate for all US couples. Your incinuation that matchmaking brides are property of American men suggests that dating services drag consenting women into a life of sex slavery- a typical feminist tall tale.
There are differing opinions on this. I don't have a staunch approach to either side. That being said, I just don't see what the problems is with doing a background check. We do it for other things. Why not this?
Criminal background checks are comonplace often required when you apply for a job, apartment or load. But the IMBRA law background checks are different. Its absurd considering this is the first Federal law that requires criminal history disclosure before two people can COMMUNICATE. This law goes way to far especially considering 99% of these romance letters will never result in marriage and thus the federal government is regulating friendship.. a very dangerous precedent.
For more information on the IMBRA law google the key terms, "IMBRA anatomy of a feminist hoax". This article was just released and reveals how the foolish Senator Brownback was manipulated by sponsoring IMBRA based upon Senator Cantwell's supposition that dating services drag women into a life of sex slavery. Brownback is sooo foolish because as it turns out this was a feminist tall tale.
I read the article the other day, but don't think that this does not happen. I kind of agree with you on just the initial communication there should not be the requirement for the background. But I would say before the bride-to-be came over that it should take place then. Like I said before, nothing wrong with safety.
Brownback's 'International Romance Regulation Act' has NOTHING to do with safety. That's the excuse that the radical Bahai feminists (Tahirih Justice center) want you to think, in order to support ulterior motives. Don't you understand that they have an agenda to keep American men away from foreign women? This law is a SCANDAL to support their bizarre religious view of equality.
By the way, there already were background checks on visa applicants PRIOR to this atrocious, UNCONSTITUTIONAL 'Intl Romance' law. Therefore, this law is not neccessary. Furthermore, nobody has said that they even getting married. So why criminalize communication? This law assumes that any communication results in marriage. How absurd!
You can tell me what some people's agenda is on this subject all day, but the fact is I don't see any problem with it. I know you don't agree. But I'm not gonna hold back my support for candidate like this over that particular topic. It's just not on the top of my list for thigs to consider. But I respect your opinion.
You don't see a problem with this DRACONIAN, BLATANTLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL law? Then you should support the Communist Party candidate for President. Brownback's 'Intl Romance Regulation Act' is a SCANDAL based on fraud, lies, deception, propaganda, cooked statistics, and 'manufactured' hysteria. He "needs to clean up his act".
That aside, I like Brownback. I don't know of any candidate that doesn't have something that I don't like. But for the most part I like him. I will continue my research before I make my choice. There are some that have been eliminated already.
practicingcatholic, Please give me one example when there is a Federal law requiring a background check? You say we do it for other things, but those are VOLUNTARY--not a Federal law, therefore your comparison is baseless. The rest of the world does not require background checks for int'l communication. Why in America? Since when is Love a crime?
Well, one example would be if you want to buy a firearm, you have to have a back ground check. But that's beside the point. I advised you that I could care less about that when there are more pressing issues. There are so many more important things to consider than worry about some poor schlub, who has to make an extra effor to get a mail-order-bride. Poor guy. Why don't you just go out and use some social skills.
practicingcatholic, (1) There's a BIG difference between purchasing a gun...and saying 'Hello' to someone. (2) There is no such thing as a "mail order bride". That's a derogatory, offensive, misleading, outdated phrase, equal to the "N" word that Brownback and his Bahai feminist friends use on a regular basis. When 2 consenting adults decide two communicate, nobody is shipped thru the mail, nobody is "ordered", and nobody is getting married.
practicingcatholic, You can keep your insensitive personal attacks to yourself. But you just told me the real reason why you support this atrocious feminist law. You just don't like the concept of international romance, and want to keep out foreign competition. This law has NOTHING to do abuse.
repeal, you know I just wrote a paragraph about this again to make you understand, but I erased it. Because as I've told you I really don't care about that issue when there's more important things to worry about in a candidate. Every candidate has some things you don't like. For you this may be the most important issue, but for me it's not even close. But thanks for expressing your side. God Bless!
Abosulte sensorship by Brownback's campaign. Anyone posting an opposing view will be banned and sensored by Brownback's campaign. Brownback's 'Intl Romance Regulation Act' makes it a felony for law-abiding American citizens to write freindship letters overseas. He partned with radical Bahai feminists in sponsoring this pathetic UNCONSTITUTIONAL legislation.
Why does one assume that the veterans, soldiers and Marines who date foreign women online have no social skills? Why does one assume that the executives who can afford to travel on international business don't date the women overseas when they travel or live overseas as expats? Why does one assume that IMBRA just makes things more "difficult" when the reality is that it makes it completely impossible to meet women who don't have email?
veteransabroad 4 years ago
As of today, Brownback's campaign has 49 YouTube videos, but he doesn't talk about his horrifying 'Int'l Romance Regulation Act' on any. Why is he avoiding this issue that he feels so strongly about (criminalizing int'l relationships)? Is now ashamed for partnering with radical Bahai feminists Tahirh Justice Center? He told his colleagues in the Senate that they are "front-line experts". They are experts in FRAUD, DECEPTION, PROPAGANDA, COOKED STATISTICS, and MANUFACTURED HYSTERIA.
RepealIMBRA 4 years ago 2
Senator Brownback's pathetic 'Intl Romance Regulation Act' was concocted to support the radical feminist Bahai religous view of equality. The proponents of this bizarre legislation manufactured a problem to support their own agenda. There has NEVER been a single conviction for 'human trafficking' involving an American-owned introduction or penpal service. Brownback is a gullible man who partnered with the wacko proponents of this Marxist / Facist law.
RepealIMBRA 4 years ago 2
Huh?
Onechosenvessel 4 years ago
I heard he opposed habeas corpus being restored.This is unacceptable.I was raised catholic and would not begin to vote for someone who thinks this way-It is backward, regressive and without habeas corpus it is oppressive.
upconstruct 4 years ago
upcon, I haven't heard that or seen any references to that statement. That does not mean it's not true, I just haven't heard whether he's for or against it.
practicingcatholic 4 years ago
upcon, I would be against it. Habeas Corpus Restoration Act of 2007- Repeals provisions of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 that eliminated the jurisdiction of any court to hear or consider applications for a writ of habeas corpus filed by aliens who have been determined by the United States to have been properly detained as enemy combatants
practicingcatholic 4 years ago
cont.......
(or who are awaiting such determination) and actions against the United States relating to the detention of such aliens and to military commissions (thus restoring habeas corpus rights existing prior to the enactment of such Act).
Allows courts to hear or consider legal challenges to military commissions only as provided by the Code of Military Justice or by a habeas corpus proceeding.
practicingcatholic 4 years ago
cont......
In other words, war detainees (terrorists) would be able to tie up our court systems. They are military combatants not citizens.
practicingcatholic 4 years ago
Vote Fred Thompson 2008!!!
KingSportsFan 4 years ago
The International Romance Regulation act apparently was sponsored by Brownback working in secret with Senator Cantwell (D-Wa an ultra liberal. The law unfairly labels American men who are dating foreign women as "premedidated torturers" and wife beaters in spite of a 1999 INS report showing these "International Marriages" have an abuse rate of less than 1%. Senator Brownback you are a hypocrite. Your romance law is designed to regulate (PREVENT )marriages between law abiding couples.
Flusman007 4 years ago
The law you are referring to is to protect women. Or maybe you thinks it's okay to abuse war brides or mail-order-brides. Maybe you think they're property.
practicingcatholic 4 years ago
"Practicing catholic": the term "mail order bride" is a derogatory term and brides don't arrive by mail. While the promoters of the romance law claim it's "to protect women"... The truth reveals these Non government organizations have a vested interest and used moral panic to get gullible legislators like Senator Brownback to sponsor the romance law to enhance their federally funded cottage industry getting sympathy from politicians to donate money (Grants) for their "manufactured problem"
Flusman007 4 years ago
"practicingcatholic". The Imigration and Naturalization Service found the abuse rate of International marriages (Foreign women who met their American husbands via the internet)at a mere 1% ... seven times less than the abuse rate for all US couples. Your incinuation that matchmaking brides are property of American men suggests that dating services drag consenting women into a life of sex slavery- a typical feminist tall tale.
Flusman007 4 years ago
"practicing catholic"... What century are you and Senator Brownback living in anyways?
Flusman007 4 years ago
There are differing opinions on this. I don't have a staunch approach to either side. That being said, I just don't see what the problems is with doing a background check. We do it for other things. Why not this?
practicingcatholic 4 years ago
Criminal background checks are comonplace often required when you apply for a job, apartment or load. But the IMBRA law background checks are different. Its absurd considering this is the first Federal law that requires criminal history disclosure before two people can COMMUNICATE. This law goes way to far especially considering 99% of these romance letters will never result in marriage and thus the federal government is regulating friendship.. a very dangerous precedent.
Flusman007 4 years ago
For more information on the IMBRA law google the key terms, "IMBRA anatomy of a feminist hoax". This article was just released and reveals how the foolish Senator Brownback was manipulated by sponsoring IMBRA based upon Senator Cantwell's supposition that dating services drag women into a life of sex slavery. Brownback is sooo foolish because as it turns out this was a feminist tall tale.
Flusman007 4 years ago
I read the article the other day, but don't think that this does not happen. I kind of agree with you on just the initial communication there should not be the requirement for the background. But I would say before the bride-to-be came over that it should take place then. Like I said before, nothing wrong with safety.
practicingcatholic 4 years ago
Brownback's 'International Romance Regulation Act' has NOTHING to do with safety. That's the excuse that the radical Bahai feminists (Tahirih Justice center) want you to think, in order to support ulterior motives. Don't you understand that they have an agenda to keep American men away from foreign women? This law is a SCANDAL to support their bizarre religious view of equality.
RepealIMBRA 4 years ago
By the way, there already were background checks on visa applicants PRIOR to this atrocious, UNCONSTITUTIONAL 'Intl Romance' law. Therefore, this law is not neccessary. Furthermore, nobody has said that they even getting married. So why criminalize communication? This law assumes that any communication results in marriage. How absurd!
RepealIMBRA 4 years ago
You can tell me what some people's agenda is on this subject all day, but the fact is I don't see any problem with it. I know you don't agree. But I'm not gonna hold back my support for candidate like this over that particular topic. It's just not on the top of my list for thigs to consider. But I respect your opinion.
iammick66 4 years ago
You don't see a problem with this DRACONIAN, BLATANTLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL law? Then you should support the Communist Party candidate for President. Brownback's 'Intl Romance Regulation Act' is a SCANDAL based on fraud, lies, deception, propaganda, cooked statistics, and 'manufactured' hysteria. He "needs to clean up his act".
RepealIMBRA 4 years ago
That aside, I like Brownback. I don't know of any candidate that doesn't have something that I don't like. But for the most part I like him. I will continue my research before I make my choice. There are some that have been eliminated already.
practicingcatholic 4 years ago
practicingcatholic, Please give me one example when there is a Federal law requiring a background check? You say we do it for other things, but those are VOLUNTARY--not a Federal law, therefore your comparison is baseless. The rest of the world does not require background checks for int'l communication. Why in America? Since when is Love a crime?
RepealIMBRA 4 years ago 2
Well, one example would be if you want to buy a firearm, you have to have a back ground check. But that's beside the point. I advised you that I could care less about that when there are more pressing issues. There are so many more important things to consider than worry about some poor schlub, who has to make an extra effor to get a mail-order-bride. Poor guy. Why don't you just go out and use some social skills.
practicingcatholic 4 years ago
practicingcatholic, (1) There's a BIG difference between purchasing a gun...and saying 'Hello' to someone. (2) There is no such thing as a "mail order bride". That's a derogatory, offensive, misleading, outdated phrase, equal to the "N" word that Brownback and his Bahai feminist friends use on a regular basis. When 2 consenting adults decide two communicate, nobody is shipped thru the mail, nobody is "ordered", and nobody is getting married.
RepealIMBRA 4 years ago
practicingcatholic, You can keep your insensitive personal attacks to yourself. But you just told me the real reason why you support this atrocious feminist law. You just don't like the concept of international romance, and want to keep out foreign competition. This law has NOTHING to do abuse.
RepealIMBRA 4 years ago
repeal, you know I just wrote a paragraph about this again to make you understand, but I erased it. Because as I've told you I really don't care about that issue when there's more important things to worry about in a candidate. Every candidate has some things you don't like. For you this may be the most important issue, but for me it's not even close. But thanks for expressing your side. God Bless!
practicingcatholic 4 years ago
Abosulte sensorship by Brownback's campaign. Anyone posting an opposing view will be banned and sensored by Brownback's campaign. Brownback's 'Intl Romance Regulation Act' makes it a felony for law-abiding American citizens to write freindship letters overseas. He partned with radical Bahai feminists in sponsoring this pathetic UNCONSTITUTIONAL legislation.
NoBrounback 4 years ago
crazy people.....
Beeffyviolin 4 years ago
viva la virgin de guadalupe!!
gundyrage 4 years ago
No, no, no, no, no, religion and politics has always been a bad idea.
stuart20017 4 years ago
It's good for Godly laws to be in place.
apromoterofgod 4 years ago