Question: what exactly is the "energy underlying all reality" that Quantum Mechanics is now pointing to?
The reason I ask this is because if this energy has a specific purpose and a specific nature, it is limited, and in that case, cannot be the "energy" that the ancients have been talking about. Or Brahman, God, Tao or Emptiness or whatever name you want to give to it.
I love how science is simply confirming in its own language, what the mystics have known for ever. A lot of the ancient systems for mental and physical health that could never be defined before are now being confirmed.
I really think this guy is high. Where is this mans evidence? What energy? It can measure the condition space of the atom/molecule to the vacuum? Seems like he may be on to something but he's adding in voodoo for some fucking reason.
chakras, chi, acupuncture, vibrations, parallel universes. This is obviously the answer to life, the universe and everything. The vacuum energy being greater than the atom energy? How can you say that without ever measuring this vacuum energy? I highly doubt this device he's talking about will ever get a patent, if exists. I have no doubt he'll try to sell it nevertheless.
Vacuum energy is opposite and nothing compared to the pressure energy produced deep in planets, stars and black holes. Even our sun produces nuclear fusion from the pressure and heat produced at the core. Vacuum energy is insignificant compared to the reaction of gravity.
Pseudo-science. He may have been a real scientist, but he's clearly more interested in following his arbitrary speculations than evidence. That's fine, and he's welcome to do it, but to attempt to communicate those speculations as if they were science is utterly dishonest. He knows better. For shame.
William Tiller, Ph.D., Ph.D. graduated with a B.A.Sc. in 1952 with a degree in Engineering Physics from the University of Toronto. He also has an M.A.Sc. and a Ph.D. from the University of Toronto.
In his conventional science field he has published over 250 scientific papers, 3 books and several patents. In parallel, for the past 30 years, he has been avocationally pursuing serious experimental and theoretical study of the field of psychoenergetics
oh trust me this guy has the paper work. his team i think discovered dark matter on the edge of the universe and found dark matter has a push effect. on it increasing the speed at which the universe xpands.
so they started looking for those forces in space inside the human body, this is what they found
@bootyraider Indeed, I haven't seen the other comments. They only appear on this page with all the comments and I didn't go further yesterday. Anyway, I should not get myself into other people's conversation.... sorry about that.
@bootyraider These concepts are difficult to the majority of people to understand. It sounds fantasy. To me what he's saying has already being said by many other people using different approaches and it makes complete sense. But people has the right to contest if they wish so... and to talk about it can be more enriching than to tell them to go away....(no, I'm not your mother :))
genius...cutting edge,,,,,love it,,,,,keep evolving ...we are energy frequncey vibration.....it's about time we address this...this is the new science
Anyone actually interested in Dr. Tiller's work can go to his website and read his white papers. tiller foundation. com. The research he is doing is laying the groundwork for marrying good science to currently unquantified life energy/consciousness/intention. Theories come before the instruments that measure and the experiments that will prove or disprove those theories. Saying his ideas aren't possible is like saying love doesn't exist because we can't (or haven't yet) measured it.
a new canser cosing divis can we see the dive and it not a divining rod is it if it rill the james randy foundasen will give you a million dallers to orove this message my page when it hits the market ill buy it
You do realize that I am not native English? So basing you proof that I do not know the topic because I make translation errors is worthless.
And I repeat he does not make any scientific sense. He just strung together a few scientific sounding words and created a story around it. You can easily check this yourself by reading a book about quantum mechanics.
Why does YouTube insist of continually fucking with their page functioning? What is that crap (Queue) bar doing at the bottom of the page. IT SUCKS! I know where the friggin' cue is. Somebody's got way too much time on their hands at YouTube.
Some of what he says makes sense actually. It seems that the majority of U2B viewers are just looking for something to criticism rather than really listen. The problem is not that he's a quack, it's that he's going about solving the problem the wrong way. Modifying physical energy levels aren't going to solve the world's problems. This in itself is wasted energy. At least he's not a religious fanatic though.
@humanpixel why listen someone who was laughed out by 1st grade students of quantum physics talking about quantum physics? I finished chemistry and yet I know more about quantum physics that this idiot.
Am I the only one to realize that he just used some hype science words and created a story around it making it all up on the fly? Nothing he says makes any science sense. He does not sound like a scientist at all.
So where is his science papers he published for peer review? He should have the Nobel price by now if he is right.
"It's always interesting to me to wonder how the universe continually comes into being."
The best advice is to start reading some science papers and learn about quantum mechanics. There is no human intuitive and human logical answer in this. It is all mathematics. The mathematics predict outcomes of experiments they are doing right now at the LHC. The Highs boson discovery is one such example that is predicted and now being tested to be true.
@obaeyens Not all information is good for people, so as to give a mathematically compute it, so that if someone was wise, and such information had, he would not give them to people;)
@obaeyens you should be able to find his papers that have been peer reviewed in scientific journals. Try enesco. His white papers with his findings are available at his website.
I have an advanced system of nei gong that I practice. I have attained in a month what takes many years. Contact me if your interested, maybe we can make a system based of scientific evidence. I also have a method which you can use to help detect the flow of this energy. We connect to zero point, we are the only beings that can. We were made in God's image. We are all about frequency, we were made for frequency transmission and reception. I can help change the world. So can all of us.
It takes many perspectives to overcome the limitations of the millenniums of lies that have been used to control humanity. Ultimately the human soul will be discovered in the laboratories of these "higher" educational institutions, and so this is a necessity, that ALL minds on all levels begin to uncover the mystery so WE can go forward in ways that DO NOT destroy life.
@mikenytro94 Before you start to spout off about science what PhD or expert qualifications do you have I wonder ?? What research have you begun ?? Have you ever explored a rain forest, commuincated with tribesmen been privy to their customs, beliefs, medicines or other " spiritual " substances ? What experienments and thesis have you started or concluded to at least even begin to have a plausable argument ? i guess none ! which sort of leaves you in the dark here and on your own.
He actually makes a good point, you dont have to have a Ph.D to know that there are a lot of different theories that contradict each other, "then who do you believe" is his point. Furthermore, have you done any of that stuff you claimed he should do before expressing his opinion? if so i demand a copy or some sort of proof or your a liar. Dont just believe someone cause they finally says something you want to hear, especially when it comes to afterlife subjects like the spirit... .
@BKPSYSOP He has a book he's trying to sell. He's a salesman. His machine will never...ever...ever be patented because it doesn't exist. It doesn't do what he says it does.
10 years from now you will still be waiting for him to create his machine that "connects the atom molecule level of reality with the vacuum level of reality"...and you will have sponsored his research with lots of money.
Just because this guy is smart doesn't make him right! Can we at least get the science part right, before we go off into the spirit world? We have not yet witnessed anything beyond what we know, and yet we continue to act like tribesmen in the rain forests cowering to the thunder cracks and whatever they imagined to be the source. Well, my friends, it seems scientists have imaginations too, and these theories can branch into many others. Then who do you believe?
@mikenytro94 Don't worry man, people will believe what they want to. When the interviewer asked him to express his machine in practical terms, he began going off and randomly throwing jargon that didn't make any sense. It certainly sounds very impressive, it just has no point. Look up Searl Effect Generator and you'll see a lot more where this came from.
But as for the loons who will take what he says and believe it automatically, good luck trying to get them to look at this objectively.
spirituality, imagination and science are all connected. What makes one does not another. If you want a product, you have to set up an experiment that will yield results. If you don't know an end, can you achieve it? Mere hope otherwise. Fulfillment. Masters have long tried to help/control the GP and failed. And who can stay enlightened forever? Time alone. So they left it at all you need is love and went back to their crystals, minerals, chemicals and electricity.
Can you say Kabbala or The Secret. Reality is a trip. The problem with this type of science is that it crosses over the bounds from the physical to the spiritual. It is the science of consciousness or of spirit and it is real.
@fatsomamacheese If you are a scientist and have a "new book" to sell, you are by definition a liar. PHD what a lol title these days. My dog sparky has more potential to sell a story than his coupling, vacuum monopole crap! He's got zero point from me dude!!!
What the Bleep most certainly captured imaginations. Using quantum mechanics as an way to completely blur the lines of reality and fantasy is very assinign and childish. I don't know much about quantum theory, but I do know a load of shit when I smell it. I think I'm with the JRF (James Randi Foundation) on this one. I call BS on this guy.
everything is connected, EVERYTHING, think about it...
In the beginning, EVERYTHING that is and ever was, was once TOGETHER, until it "expanded", that's all it did, was expand, but everything is composited of Carbon, and is connected at a molecular level, it ALL came from one thing. You may not think that's true, but can you see a Nanobe? (The smallest organism in existence) it could be connected to you right now, and you wouldn't even know it, because you can't see it...
Interesting idea - and depending on how you define "connected", you'd be right.
As an example, here's a hypothetical;
A bomb explodes in a city, decmiating it for centuries.Millenia later, an orchard has grown up there. Your claim is that the orchard is linked to the bomb, and strictly speaking, the link between cause and effect is clear. They are NOT the same atoms, to there is no physical link, but there IS a temporal link.
btw. hydrogn is the most common in the universe, not carbon.
I'm interested to know where you actually draw the line at relation.
The ONLY way my atoms are related to yours is that they were created in the same star, 4 billion years ago - Personally, I don't call that a relation because the current configuration of our atoms are SO random that their current configurations, statisctically speaking, almost infinitely unlikely (same as pretty much any other configuration)
I just don't think you understand what I'm getting at....
everything came from the same place, the big bang, which then created stars and planets (again all came from same material) then the water and trees and ozone developed, again, came from the same stuff, then microbes, and then life, again came from the stuff that came from the big bang, then came everything we see, which is a part of something that is either connected directly or indirectly to ONE main Mass at one point in time.
Your statement is only true on the level of the, absolutely most fundamental particles - quarks - in fact, even that is debatable, because that would imply that quarks are unchanging, and in fact, they do change.
The problem is, you're not defining clearly enough what this "material" is - certainly it is not the carbon, oxygen, etc - since none of this existed at the BB. In fact, the only thing the BB made was energy - not particles, until much much later.
so your implying that none of the elements were not created as a result of one major event, which created everything?
everything has to come from something, which came from something, which came from the Big Bang, it's all connected in one way or another, there's no way around it.
if you took a glass of water from the ocean, and froze it, although it's now a solid and not apart of the ocean, did it not once come from the ocean?
We're on different levels - Im talking about subatomic particles, you're talking about elements; No elements were created in the BB at all. The BB was a release only of energy - photons. It took a long long time for the subatomic particles (quarks) to form from the energy. Protons&neutrons are made from 3 quarks, electrons from 2. Quarks can spontaneously change their state too, becoming a different quark
My point is that these things are related by their history only - not their actual stuff
alright, but what I'm getting at is WITHOUT the Big Bang NOTHING could have been formed, so altho it took a long time for sub atomic particles to form from the energy, it essentially was EVENTUALLY made possible due to the Big Bang, being that these particles came from the Big Bang, the same particles that make up everything in existence, we must have once been apart of that, at the root of life, the material to create life was the result of the Big Bang,thus we are all connected. at a basic lvl
Like I said, at the most utterly and irrelevant level, yes, we are all composed of the energy that was released in the BB - but this is obvious, and it's also moot - i.e. if the BB did not occur, then we would not exist to ponder it. This is also known as the "weak anthropic principle", it's a lazy man's way to explay why we observe the universe to be exactly the way it is.
(i.e. if it were any different, then we would observe it to be so... obvious stuff).
You are childishly refuting things he did not say but you imply he said. So, WHO is the clown? Energy is mass is energy, and that pretty much covers all "things" in the universe we know. (I defer to Einstein's expertise on the topic.) Your definition of energy as "ability" is from where? Your physics 101 textbook giving definitions from the age of Newton?
Awesome as in a quack spewing almost completely random physics jargon in a ploy to sound legitimate to the credulous, while describing something incredibly fictional without demonstrating anything scientific?
Question: what exactly is the "energy underlying all reality" that Quantum Mechanics is now pointing to?
The reason I ask this is because if this energy has a specific purpose and a specific nature, it is limited, and in that case, cannot be the "energy" that the ancients have been talking about. Or Brahman, God, Tao or Emptiness or whatever name you want to give to it.
FearThisChannel 3 weeks ago
Knew this was metaphysical, mumbo jumbo, bullshit within the first few seconds. Weak.
ridewave444 2 months ago
nice one!
adelle0001 3 months ago
whats the very best method for enlightenment
visiblenergy 4 months ago
@visiblenergy forgiving oneself
yoganb7 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@visiblenergy and writing on self
yoganb7 3 months ago
I love how science is simply confirming in its own language, what the mystics have known for ever. A lot of the ancient systems for mental and physical health that could never be defined before are now being confirmed.
KeegBurkholder 4 months ago 2
I really think this guy is high. Where is this mans evidence? What energy? It can measure the condition space of the atom/molecule to the vacuum? Seems like he may be on to something but he's adding in voodoo for some fucking reason.
aqouby 5 months ago
PLEASE!!! THE SOUND IS TOO LOW!!!
SMZcom 5 months ago
Comment removed
cheekygmail 5 months ago
I kept waiting for him to say: "It's an energy field created by all living things. It surrounds us, penetrates us, and binds the galaxy together."
cheekygmail 5 months ago
chakras, chi, acupuncture, vibrations, parallel universes. This is obviously the answer to life, the universe and everything. The vacuum energy being greater than the atom energy? How can you say that without ever measuring this vacuum energy? I highly doubt this device he's talking about will ever get a patent, if exists. I have no doubt he'll try to sell it nevertheless.
altvali1 6 months ago
metallurgy?? are you fucking kidding me?
MetroAdventures 6 months ago
What the fuck is he actually on about?! Is he for real??
ashmzki 7 months ago
HAHA you sneeky bastard! Vibe-meter, you are thinking of an E-meter, scientologist fucker!
mmaaxx1198 7 months ago
Vacuum energy is opposite and nothing compared to the pressure energy produced deep in planets, stars and black holes. Even our sun produces nuclear fusion from the pressure and heat produced at the core. Vacuum energy is insignificant compared to the reaction of gravity.
GateMessenger 8 months ago
"I think its really important for the... humans"
Kylymageeli 8 months ago 2
Pseudo-science. He may have been a real scientist, but he's clearly more interested in following his arbitrary speculations than evidence. That's fine, and he's welcome to do it, but to attempt to communicate those speculations as if they were science is utterly dishonest. He knows better. For shame.
paradigmino 10 months ago
This man is a scam artist.
UnlistedAccount 10 months ago
humbug!!! babblegab for the ignorant.
yenrabaraho 10 months ago
humbug!!!
yenrabaraho 10 months ago
William Tiller, Ph.D., Ph.D. graduated with a B.A.Sc. in 1952 with a degree in Engineering Physics from the University of Toronto. He also has an M.A.Sc. and a Ph.D. from the University of Toronto.
In his conventional science field he has published over 250 scientific papers, 3 books and several patents. In parallel, for the past 30 years, he has been avocationally pursuing serious experimental and theoretical study of the field of psychoenergetics
TheGrimdoor 11 months ago 2
i agree he does sell books. but name any doctor that is on any form of media who doesnt have a book out... dr. phil dr. oz. dr. seuss hahaha
this guy is closer to the truth the regular science allows.... seee obaeyens says hes a liar and a cheat. and only after your money....
but we all know that obaeyens has a Ph D in quantum physics like tiller.... so he can tell us how tillers wrong... and doesnt know anything
TheGrimdoor 11 months ago
oh trust me this guy has the paper work. his team i think discovered dark matter on the edge of the universe and found dark matter has a push effect. on it increasing the speed at which the universe xpands.
so they started looking for those forces in space inside the human body, this is what they found
TheGrimdoor 11 months ago
best bio feed back... Push Hands Tai Chi Chuan !!
petkndy 1 year ago
@bootyraider :)
fernandatralala 1 year ago
@bootyraider Indeed, I haven't seen the other comments. They only appear on this page with all the comments and I didn't go further yesterday. Anyway, I should not get myself into other people's conversation.... sorry about that.
fernandatralala 1 year ago
@bootyraider These concepts are difficult to the majority of people to understand. It sounds fantasy. To me what he's saying has already being said by many other people using different approaches and it makes complete sense. But people has the right to contest if they wish so... and to talk about it can be more enriching than to tell them to go away....(no, I'm not your mother :))
fernandatralala 1 year ago
genius...cutting edge,,,,,love it,,,,,keep evolving ...we are energy frequncey vibration.....it's about time we address this...this is the new science
The888777 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bootyraider
"If English isn't your native language; you don't understand it very well; then how can WE accurately depend on your interpretation?? "
You are a funny guy if you believe this to matter. Did you ever hear a German or Indian scientist speak English?
obaeyens 1 year ago
@bootyraider
So? I have dyslexia and not even English speaking? Big deal...
obaeyens 1 year ago
@scozman
"then why do so many people understand every thing he says?"
You lean pretend to understand?
obaeyens 1 year ago
Anyone actually interested in Dr. Tiller's work can go to his website and read his white papers. tiller foundation. com. The research he is doing is laying the groundwork for marrying good science to currently unquantified life energy/consciousness/intention. Theories come before the instruments that measure and the experiments that will prove or disprove those theories. Saying his ideas aren't possible is like saying love doesn't exist because we can't (or haven't yet) measured it.
brllynt1 1 year ago
a new canser cosing divis can we see the dive and it not a divining rod is it if it rill the james randy foundasen will give you a million dallers to orove this message my page when it hits the market ill buy it
donaldstafford 1 year ago
@bootyraider
You do realize that I am not native English? So basing you proof that I do not know the topic because I make translation errors is worthless.
And I repeat he does not make any scientific sense. He just strung together a few scientific sounding words and created a story around it. You can easily check this yourself by reading a book about quantum mechanics.
obaeyens 1 year ago
It's starting to feel pretty super cool story in here.
mikeroephonics 1 year ago
WARNING = Pseudo Science
Naugrimo 1 year ago
Why does YouTube insist of continually fucking with their page functioning? What is that crap (Queue) bar doing at the bottom of the page. IT SUCKS! I know where the friggin' cue is. Somebody's got way too much time on their hands at YouTube.
AceOfHeart2012 1 year ago
this is sooo fake.... that santa claus only borrows some physics 'words/terms' to make it sound real....
xHizukax 1 year ago
Some of what he says makes sense actually. It seems that the majority of U2B viewers are just looking for something to criticism rather than really listen. The problem is not that he's a quack, it's that he's going about solving the problem the wrong way. Modifying physical energy levels aren't going to solve the world's problems. This in itself is wasted energy. At least he's not a religious fanatic though.
humanpixel 1 year ago
@humanpixel why listen someone who was laughed out by 1st grade students of quantum physics talking about quantum physics? I finished chemistry and yet I know more about quantum physics that this idiot.
Naugrimo 1 year ago
@humanpixel
"Some of what he says makes sense actually"
Nothing makes sense scientifically in his claims.
He "appear" to make sense as long as you have no scientifically knowledge.
obaeyens 1 year ago
Read Conversation with AZ by Yosip Lavrich
joeero8 1 year ago
Am I the only one to realize that he just used some hype science words and created a story around it making it all up on the fly? Nothing he says makes any science sense. He does not sound like a scientist at all.
So where is his science papers he published for peer review? He should have the Nobel price by now if he is right.
obaeyens 1 year ago 2
@obaeyens totally...the "atom molecule"...wow. Quack.
KamiKazeBliss 1 year ago
@obaeyens
Funny, to me he's making perfect sense.
It's always interesting to me to wonder how the universe continually comes into being.
What's doing it?
smudge6699 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@smudge6699
"It's always interesting to me to wonder how the universe continually comes into being."
The best advice is to start reading some science papers and learn about quantum mechanics. There is no human intuitive and human logical answer in this. It is all mathematics. The mathematics predict outcomes of experiments they are doing right now at the LHC. The Highs boson discovery is one such example that is predicted and now being tested to be true.
obaeyens 1 year ago
@obaeyens Not all information is good for people, so as to give a mathematically compute it, so that if someone was wise, and such information had, he would not give them to people;)
antilower 1 year ago
Comment removed
carpediem219 1 year ago
@obaeyens you should be able to find his papers that have been peer reviewed in scientific journals. Try enesco. His white papers with his findings are available at his website.
brllynt1 1 year ago
@brllynt1 EBSCO not ENESCO.
brllynt1 1 year ago
I was after physics....
joab321 1 year ago
I have an advanced system of nei gong that I practice. I have attained in a month what takes many years. Contact me if your interested, maybe we can make a system based of scientific evidence. I also have a method which you can use to help detect the flow of this energy. We connect to zero point, we are the only beings that can. We were made in God's image. We are all about frequency, we were made for frequency transmission and reception. I can help change the world. So can all of us.
vibratingstillness 1 year ago
It takes many perspectives to overcome the limitations of the millenniums of lies that have been used to control humanity. Ultimately the human soul will be discovered in the laboratories of these "higher" educational institutions, and so this is a necessity, that ALL minds on all levels begin to uncover the mystery so WE can go forward in ways that DO NOT destroy life.
abracadabrais 1 year ago 2
Get a good hit of DMT... and then come back here to tell us more about "science... lol
buddhistpunk2211 2 years ago
@mikenytro94 Before you start to spout off about science what PhD or expert qualifications do you have I wonder ?? What research have you begun ?? Have you ever explored a rain forest, commuincated with tribesmen been privy to their customs, beliefs, medicines or other " spiritual " substances ? What experienments and thesis have you started or concluded to at least even begin to have a plausable argument ? i guess none ! which sort of leaves you in the dark here and on your own.
BKPSYSOP 2 years ago
He actually makes a good point, you dont have to have a Ph.D to know that there are a lot of different theories that contradict each other, "then who do you believe" is his point. Furthermore, have you done any of that stuff you claimed he should do before expressing his opinion? if so i demand a copy or some sort of proof or your a liar. Dont just believe someone cause they finally says something you want to hear, especially when it comes to afterlife subjects like the spirit... .
SIRA063 2 years ago
@BKPSYSOP He has a book he's trying to sell. He's a salesman. His machine will never...ever...ever be patented because it doesn't exist. It doesn't do what he says it does.
10 years from now you will still be waiting for him to create his machine that "connects the atom molecule level of reality with the vacuum level of reality"...and you will have sponsored his research with lots of money.
fatsomamacheese 1 year ago 2
@fatsomamacheese The problem is that the 100 percent of the country does not create a vacuum
antilower 1 year ago
Just because this guy is smart doesn't make him right! Can we at least get the science part right, before we go off into the spirit world? We have not yet witnessed anything beyond what we know, and yet we continue to act like tribesmen in the rain forests cowering to the thunder cracks and whatever they imagined to be the source. Well, my friends, it seems scientists have imaginations too, and these theories can branch into many others. Then who do you believe?
mikenytro94 2 years ago
@mikenytro94 do some research.
TheAnalMonkfish 2 years ago
@mikenytro94 Don't worry man, people will believe what they want to. When the interviewer asked him to express his machine in practical terms, he began going off and randomly throwing jargon that didn't make any sense. It certainly sounds very impressive, it just has no point. Look up Searl Effect Generator and you'll see a lot more where this came from.
But as for the loons who will take what he says and believe it automatically, good luck trying to get them to look at this objectively.
fatsomamacheese 1 year ago 2
@mikenytro94 You're completely right. How can anyone listen to this and pretend that they are hearing information?
Yony42 1 year ago
spirituality, imagination and science are all connected. What makes one does not another. If you want a product, you have to set up an experiment that will yield results. If you don't know an end, can you achieve it? Mere hope otherwise. Fulfillment. Masters have long tried to help/control the GP and failed. And who can stay enlightened forever? Time alone. So they left it at all you need is love and went back to their crystals, minerals, chemicals and electricity.
interestingramble 2 years ago
Thanks for the kind sharing*
dracentsparkle 2 years ago
Remember this guy is a professor emeritus at Stanford. I don't think it's intelligent to dismiss what he says so easily.
capricious71 2 years ago
Can you say Kabbala or The Secret. Reality is a trip. The problem with this type of science is that it crosses over the bounds from the physical to the spiritual. It is the science of consciousness or of spirit and it is real.
TheWillwillwill 2 years ago
@capricious71 There are lots of smart people who are liars...
fatsomamacheese 1 year ago
@fatsomamacheese If you are a scientist and have a "new book" to sell, you are by definition a liar. PHD what a lol title these days. My dog sparky has more potential to sell a story than his coupling, vacuum monopole crap! He's got zero point from me dude!!!
MrCabanes 1 year ago
@MrCabanes "If you are a scientist and have a "new book" to sell, you are by definition a liar." haha, too right.
fatsomamacheese 1 year ago
Can you give an explanation that disproves this, or at least an alternative theory please.
BootyBot 2 years ago
What the Bleep most certainly captured imaginations. Using quantum mechanics as an way to completely blur the lines of reality and fantasy is very assinign and childish. I don't know much about quantum theory, but I do know a load of shit when I smell it. I think I'm with the JRF (James Randi Foundation) on this one. I call BS on this guy.
S0XF0X 2 years ago
A lot of ppl smelled things before and still they were wrong (as history proves).
Dont let the JR foundation do your thinking for u. If u do, then ur dead lost.
youlikemyusername 2 years ago
He has the cheat codes to become a level 5 thetan!
Show us how to levitate with your chi and vacuum energy!
Shisho2k 2 years ago
everything is connected, EVERYTHING, think about it...
In the beginning, EVERYTHING that is and ever was, was once TOGETHER, until it "expanded", that's all it did, was expand, but everything is composited of Carbon, and is connected at a molecular level, it ALL came from one thing. You may not think that's true, but can you see a Nanobe? (The smallest organism in existence) it could be connected to you right now, and you wouldn't even know it, because you can't see it...
1981z28camaro 3 years ago
Interesting idea - and depending on how you define "connected", you'd be right.
As an example, here's a hypothetical;
A bomb explodes in a city, decmiating it for centuries.Millenia later, an orchard has grown up there. Your claim is that the orchard is linked to the bomb, and strictly speaking, the link between cause and effect is clear. They are NOT the same atoms, to there is no physical link, but there IS a temporal link.
btw. hydrogn is the most common in the universe, not carbon.
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
I'm just saying that everything came from ONE central area (Big Bang) unless there were multiple locations where Big Bangs took place, lol
so with that said, everything expanded from mass the size of a pea.
so you and me, and everyone and everything, are really one of the same. unless you came from one big bang, and I came from another, lol
then we are all related when you get right down to it.
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
I'm interested to know where you actually draw the line at relation.
The ONLY way my atoms are related to yours is that they were created in the same star, 4 billion years ago - Personally, I don't call that a relation because the current configuration of our atoms are SO random that their current configurations, statisctically speaking, almost infinitely unlikely (same as pretty much any other configuration)
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
I just don't think you understand what I'm getting at....
everything came from the same place, the big bang, which then created stars and planets (again all came from same material) then the water and trees and ozone developed, again, came from the same stuff, then microbes, and then life, again came from the stuff that came from the big bang, then came everything we see, which is a part of something that is either connected directly or indirectly to ONE main Mass at one point in time.
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
Your statement is only true on the level of the, absolutely most fundamental particles - quarks - in fact, even that is debatable, because that would imply that quarks are unchanging, and in fact, they do change.
The problem is, you're not defining clearly enough what this "material" is - certainly it is not the carbon, oxygen, etc - since none of this existed at the BB. In fact, the only thing the BB made was energy - not particles, until much much later.
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
so your implying that none of the elements were not created as a result of one major event, which created everything?
everything has to come from something, which came from something, which came from the Big Bang, it's all connected in one way or another, there's no way around it.
if you took a glass of water from the ocean, and froze it, although it's now a solid and not apart of the ocean, did it not once come from the ocean?
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
We're on different levels - Im talking about subatomic particles, you're talking about elements; No elements were created in the BB at all. The BB was a release only of energy - photons. It took a long long time for the subatomic particles (quarks) to form from the energy. Protons&neutrons are made from 3 quarks, electrons from 2. Quarks can spontaneously change their state too, becoming a different quark
My point is that these things are related by their history only - not their actual stuff
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
alright, but what I'm getting at is WITHOUT the Big Bang NOTHING could have been formed, so altho it took a long time for sub atomic particles to form from the energy, it essentially was EVENTUALLY made possible due to the Big Bang, being that these particles came from the Big Bang, the same particles that make up everything in existence, we must have once been apart of that, at the root of life, the material to create life was the result of the Big Bang,thus we are all connected. at a basic lvl
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
Like I said, at the most utterly and irrelevant level, yes, we are all composed of the energy that was released in the BB - but this is obvious, and it's also moot - i.e. if the BB did not occur, then we would not exist to ponder it. This is also known as the "weak anthropic principle", it's a lazy man's way to explay why we observe the universe to be exactly the way it is.
(i.e. if it were any different, then we would observe it to be so... obvious stuff).
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
.. and is interconnected instantaneously through quantum entanglement.
AmagnonX 2 years ago
exactly
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
"...which postulates the existence of subtle energies, beyond the four fundamental forces....."
The clown is a retard. None of the forces contain energy; energy is not a thing--- it is an ability.
Desertphile 3 years ago
gas is a thing so is my lighter.
thedankfranksays 3 years ago
Comment removed
vikingbrynn 2 years ago
You are childishly refuting things he did not say but you imply he said. So, WHO is the clown? Energy is mass is energy, and that pretty much covers all "things" in the universe we know. (I defer to Einstein's expertise on the topic.) Your definition of energy as "ability" is from where? Your physics 101 textbook giving definitions from the age of Newton?
vikingbrynn 2 years ago
Awesome video. Ty for posting this!!!
MineTheSouls 3 years ago
Awesome as in a quack spewing almost completely random physics jargon in a ploy to sound legitimate to the credulous, while describing something incredibly fictional without demonstrating anything scientific?
Shisho2k 2 years ago