american companies built and perfected this nozzle type. do some research on the F-16 MATV and the F-18 HARV in google. the US had flying versions in the early 1990s and there are a few videos out there to see for yourself... the MiG-29 OVT didn't come about until 2000-2001.
3D thrust vectoring only demonstrates a 10-15% improvement in combat efficiency over no thrust vectoring. the F-22 only has 2-d because of this, and it's simple 2-d nozzles have a much lower radar signature.
@ibetithasnot 3D demonstrates only 10-15% improvement. yea right, but can your F-22 do some controlled flat-spin like the MiG-29OVT? that maneuver is soooo damn useful in a gun dogfight you know.
The americans and russians have both stated 10-15%. Dogfighting doesn't happen in today's aerial warfare... the planes are too fast and the avionics/armament packages are too complex for a human pilot to process for that kind of engagement. You think you can aim a gun on a target moving 600mph+? NO.
Like i've said before, you can't kill what you can't see and you can't run from what you can't see either. Stealth is where it's at for now until remote or autonomous aircraft are perfected.
@ibetithasnot there's already radars that can detect stealth, but 3D TVC and stealth still give some benefits in dogfight or BVR.
well if dogfight doesn't gonna happen, then why they still put guns? what if your missiles run out, or all of em' missed? most fighters can fly below 300+mph to dogfight, thats for sure.
I'm not a smart guy, but my question is: why u need this vectorial thrust?..what's the reason for?..i'm referring to practical reasons...because I see it only usefull for dog fights ww2 times...
I like how americans talk about freedom yet their votes during election get recycled into toilet paper, meaning they matter for one thing only ...wiping ass. Apart from this the engine has got a nickname iron flower.
The US does not build their jets in anticipation of land invasion. Maybe it would be nice for unapproved runway takeoff. Throw on some bigger tires and intake baffles and were there.
But who needs it since the US has aircraft carriers and hundreds of air refueler tankers.
Yes...as a matter of fact I am in the Air Force and work with B-1 bombers. You know, the plane the Russians copied to make the TU-160 "Blackjack"? LOL!
I am an old SAC warrior. SAC- Strategic Air Command. Remember that from the Cold War era? And you comrade vaninec, where do you work?
If they are more supriour, the nhow come Russia developed the T-U4, Tu-95, TU-160 blackjack...all were copies of American aircraft the B-29, B-52 and the B-1 bomber.
I know the Russians can put out some good stuff these days but not as good as American.
Who knows, the way the US isn't buying new military aircraft anymore, The third world nations will soon beat the US in technology.
Okay. The B-1 can carry 84 500 lbs bombs or 24 2000 bombs. It can carry ALCMs. It has three bombays while the TU-160 has two. The B-1 has seen combat from a couple of wars and the TU-160 none.
How much can the Tu-160 carry? The only advantage the TU-160 has over the B-1 it can fly faster and maybe....farther because it's so big. The B-1 has a 7000 mile range...what's the TU-160's The B-1 was introduced in the early 70's the TU-160 was introduced in the 80's. Are sure the B-1 wasn't copied?
Just put teh B-1 and the TU-160 next each other..one would think one copied the other. It doesn't take a rocket scientist. Like the TU-95, it looks like the B-52 with props.
B-1's avioncs can trick anyone itno thinking the plane is in a different location, If it gets caught on radar then it can blanket the who screen so it can be pin pointed.
The B-1 has dropped more then 60% of the munitions in Iraq and Afghanistan. TU-160 hasn't even seen combat so what logic are you using to declare the TU-16- the winner over the B-1? The Tu-160 is for naw, FOR DISPALY USE ONLY. I bet those huge bombays have never been filled.
Just because the plane is bigger doesn't mean it's better.
You want see how tu-160 works? Really? So as your father was tought in school in times of antirussian propaganda, Hide under the table and cover with bedsheet.
If I want to know how a TU-160 works just go look at a B-1. has the TU-160 ever fired a shot in anger?
In case you didn't know, the Cold War was going on in the 60's then the next two decades. The only propaganda that was taught was in the USSR. The US did not keep their people in a Iron curtain against their own will. Nor did they shoot people escaping across the Berlin wall to get over to the West.
You know we makeing curtains from silk or sintetik or i dont know I`m not seamstress. My father was officer consultant in India, and we all was in another countries. What is iron curtain?
I onle hered that when "iron curtain" that was visible only for you as i understand falls, number of narkotics increase hundreds times, and we first time heard about pediks, transsecsuals and pedofiles.
God help us to repair iron curtain because my mail is full of spam letters that offer to increase penis 3 tymes or buy house in Singapur only for drilleon$s and im really scared of homo parades in eu. What if that homos became agressive???
The IRON CURTAIN. It existed up until 1991 when the Soviet union collapsed. Russians couldn't travel freely and were forcibly kept in. That's why it was called the iron curtain.
You didn't know that did you? How much of the cold war do you know? Not enough I bet..where do you live?
I`m Russian. And we travel freely. And my parents too. And grandfather too. We didnt see any curtain. there is only curtain in your mind. I bet you know about cold war a lot cause its still going in USA. But not in Russia.
After 91 it was real hell. Our lifes was broken. We became poor, no food, no freedom, no literature, only propaganda telling that we all alcoholics. Before 91 in"iron curtain" was great. Free education, medicine
emagine it was free flats in USSR. no credit for 10 years, just wait your waiting list and you have flat. And after "iron curtain" falls, it was hell. Crisys was in 96(your propaganda tells that was most freedom moment in Russia)
Hope we will newer see US democracy again. Hope we will create this curtain as soon as candagars cocaine, pedics, democrats, we must stop that crap or it will kill us.
If yo don't like freedom that is your own choice. There are people here n the US who rely on government for their living and cannot take care of themselves and those of us who work hard for a living have to pay for them.
We love freedom and belive me after civil war that swept 20 millions people fighting for freedom we know what freedom is. But you think that freedom its right to fuck your girlfriend in the main street or to bee pedik. Our understanding of freedom is different
Hey! I don't like that either it's the liberals in the country who think they can do, define anything they want and do nothing to contribute to the civil society.
Most of us in the US aren't PERVERTS. But unfortunately there are cites like San Fransisco think they can live any way the like without consequences.
What an idiotism you talking to me that it wasnt free education in USSR. Im telling you. Im LIVE HERE IN RUSSIA idiot. Im telling you IT WAS. "travel freely were the KGB" My unkle was artist he was in half of the world.
God you are dull like log. Thats what TV made with people. Russian telling him that it was ok here, he is american live in another side of the earth know nothing about us telling that "no! it wasnt!" O god you so dull!
Yes I'm sure it was hell because our country have spent itself into oblivion and there wasn't any value to your currency. The US is going through but not as sever a similar situation that can ruin it financially.
You didn't have free education or medicine. That is one of the things that caused you to go broke. It's not free because everyone is paying for it through taxation. On top of that it was rationed just like you grocery store lines because there wasn't any food on he shelves.
Okay, so during the USSR times you can go anywhere you may...yeah right! The only Russians that could travel freely were the KGB and spies.
You all own the propaganda. Coming from Saul Alinsky and Karl Marx you all created an alter reality of a Utopian mindset. In reality you lived in crappy conditions but in your head it was Utopian.
Just curious, what did you think of Stalin? Was he good for he USSR?
And you are overloaded with propaganda. Emagine you telling that crap to me, Russian who live here, and you explain me that we was forcibly kept here what kind of idiot you are? Go tell that to your boyfriend, or girlfriend i dont know who you prefere soon as you are american
@moljar Well no it doesn't fly like a fat dinosaur and if it fly's like any dinosaur it would be pterodactyl its not called a Raptor for nothing , the F22 is very vesitile, and don't go thinking its because i am an american or something like that just watch any video of it the technology on that bird is way ahead of most other aircraft
@dreammaker182 This is how it goes down.. USA makes a fighter jet.. Russia makes a fighter based on it.. They simply "Improve the best"... Or.. in American english.. "Steal"... I remember a fighter pilot saying he was chasing a Russian MiG and he said he saw maneuvers american fighterpilots could only dream about.. why? Russian fighter jets might not be the fastest or the most agile.. But they can take a serious punch! It takes allot of BOOM! to destroy a Russian fighter!
A russian fighter can take as much as any fighter nowadays. A solid missile to the center of the plane and it's over. It's not like fighterjets are made of impenetrable steel, cause it hasn't been invented yet.
@Zapust None of what you have said is really right. They're rugged, ie. Mig-29 is less susceptible to fod .ect, but apart from that they're just as vulnerable to a missile.
As for basing their designs on US aircraft, that's not completely true either. MiG-25 -> F-15 -> Su-27...who "copied" who? There's no black and white.
@Zapust@b101aa2 It is sad for Israel that the proponents of the Lavi rejected my un-detailed early 1987 proposal to add 3D vectoring to the Lavi, claiming that 3D-post-stall agility & maximized take-off/landing/flight-agility-safety & recovery is none-sense even after my 1st in aviation history flight tests of STVS (with 3D vectoring). [May 18, 1987 by Aviation Week. Facebook cite ["Benjamin Gal-Or"]. Their rejection failed the Lavi future, at least.
Looks very complicated & prone to malfunction.
carloss1960 1 month ago
@carloss1960 No prejudice please
KRaikkonenSF 1 month ago
Would they get mad if you fed it peanuts?
deathcar 2 months ago
alientechnologie
ClanOfSteel 2 months ago
looks like its gonna grab grandma by the face
rushofspeed 2 months ago
That's cool, now bring out the F-22...
AntiTroll101 2 months ago
@AntiTroll101 they would but unfortunately its stuck back at the airbase with mechanical problems *trollface.jpeg
camwizardoz 2 months ago
START THE ENGINE
treygroove65 2 months ago
mechanic ass hole
1Deejay7 2 months ago 2
wow...is that corrosion?
MrCsviper 3 months ago
@MrCsviper ha ha idiots
Roofius2 1 month ago
looks like a maggot
ddioppp 3 months ago
the thrust differential is just as important as the vectoring.
kozmon0t 3 months ago
It's probably a demo model off of an old plane
909beats 3 months ago
@Shitraver so is my dick lol
atoz7368 3 months ago
Why do Russians think troll is offensive? He was making a remark about how it's poor appearance.
MrElgeneralisimo 7 months ago
is that home made? lol thats a poor job for a professional
GameGuideSite 7 months ago
@GameGuideSite What the hell are you talking about troll?
2129261184 7 months ago
@GameGuideSite Yeah, cause I bet anyone here can walk into a supermarket and say:
"Hi there, where is the tool section? You see, I want to build an aircraft thrust vectoring nozzle in my garage".
intruderalert01 7 months ago
@intruderalert01 people do... people build jet engines in their garage...
GameGuideSite 7 months ago
@GameGuideSite Yeah, I'm sure they do...
intruderalert01 7 months ago
@intruderalert01
Give the troll some slack..
Poor fellow must think RC jest are in the same league as actual jets. :-)
myquill23 6 months ago 4
*waits until everyone is behind it*
*switches engine on*
*multikill*
ShadowRSonic 9 months ago 20
1,600 made 500 crashes CHEAP!!!
striker2387045 11 months ago
Wait for it........rights shes behind it, switch it on now
DavoCitizen 1 year ago
looks like an ass hole
jiba1573 1 year ago
thats mega men's arm
peruface 1 year ago
that lady could have had her head toasted if they actually turned the engine on! lol
dreammaker182 1 year ago
@agibbs98 i agree that era of dogfight is 'over'. if i'm a pilot, i also will never dogfight. but what will you do if you HAD to? run?
identifying UFOs? is it something like 'intercept' lol
its good to see a pilot here lol what jet do you fly? Rafales? :D
itom95 1 year ago
Comment removed
antohich 1 year ago
@antohich WTF are you talking about? what "easy task"?
itom95 1 year ago
@itom95 Sorry bro I replayed to the wrong person
antohich 1 year ago
Looks like an Ass
joecelle5 1 year ago
Well that's a sad attempt at thrust vectoring
gridsinister 1 year ago
i can do that with my dick
supermax833 1 year ago
this looks funny
supermax833 1 year ago
american companies built and perfected this nozzle type. do some research on the F-16 MATV and the F-18 HARV in google. the US had flying versions in the early 1990s and there are a few videos out there to see for yourself... the MiG-29 OVT didn't come about until 2000-2001.
3D thrust vectoring only demonstrates a 10-15% improvement in combat efficiency over no thrust vectoring. the F-22 only has 2-d because of this, and it's simple 2-d nozzles have a much lower radar signature.
ibetithasnot 1 year ago
@ibetithasnot 3D demonstrates only 10-15% improvement. yea right, but can your F-22 do some controlled flat-spin like the MiG-29OVT? that maneuver is soooo damn useful in a gun dogfight you know.
itom95 1 year ago
@itom95
The americans and russians have both stated 10-15%. Dogfighting doesn't happen in today's aerial warfare... the planes are too fast and the avionics/armament packages are too complex for a human pilot to process for that kind of engagement. You think you can aim a gun on a target moving 600mph+? NO.
Like i've said before, you can't kill what you can't see and you can't run from what you can't see either. Stealth is where it's at for now until remote or autonomous aircraft are perfected.
ibetithasnot 1 year ago
@ibetithasnot there's already radars that can detect stealth, but 3D TVC and stealth still give some benefits in dogfight or BVR.
well if dogfight doesn't gonna happen, then why they still put guns? what if your missiles run out, or all of em' missed? most fighters can fly below 300+mph to dogfight, thats for sure.
itom95 1 year ago
looks like my assholle :)
sano0311 1 year ago
I'm not a smart guy, but my question is: why u need this vectorial thrust?..what's the reason for?..i'm referring to practical reasons...because I see it only usefull for dog fights ww2 times...
GRATZIANI2002 1 year ago
that's frickin' cool
wallbreaker2 1 year ago
I like how americans talk about freedom yet their votes during election get recycled into toilet paper, meaning they matter for one thing only ...wiping ass. Apart from this the engine has got a nickname iron flower.
reddwarf50 2 years ago
um...BS
Dogmeat1950 1 year ago
That's eerie.
camelapodo 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I can do that with my dick head.
rainerfilm 2 years ago 30
is that alive :)
cybercow222 2 years ago
What is the smellting point of that nozzle ? and why is it capable to move up and down and left and rigt :P:..
Asim2846 2 years ago
huh? Pretty much its overlap and when one layer is pushed futher than the other, it turns.
annihil8ted 2 years ago
Ahh, i understand, the nozzle is it unsmeltable, how good does it resist to heat?
Asim2846 2 years ago
U could tell where the inspiration for that sort of nozzle came from.... Its obviously the anus spincter muscle of the human body!!!
ultimateearner 2 years ago
just because something resembles an anus, doesnt mean that it was made with anus in mind.
=D
TheBlitz1 2 years ago 7
or was it? naaaaa
drummer987 2 years ago
lulz
TheBlitz1 2 years ago
Это не МИГ зто СУ учите матчасть "знатоки"!!!!!
lekthundr 2 years ago
lol imagine if they turned it on
NinjaKid3000 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Looks cool...too bad it's Russian junk.
foxsecret 3 years ago
This Russian junk can take off from mud, iced sea, send anything
Just to get into US jet take at least 30 min
and 200 people to sweep take off strip
vaninec 3 years ago
The US does not build their jets in anticipation of land invasion. Maybe it would be nice for unapproved runway takeoff. Throw on some bigger tires and intake baffles and were there.
But who needs it since the US has aircraft carriers and hundreds of air refueler tankers.
foxsecret 3 years ago
Ha ha ha
did you been in Navy?
are you a pilot-expert?
dont make laugh again
vaninec 3 years ago
Yes...as a matter of fact I am in the Air Force and work with B-1 bombers. You know, the plane the Russians copied to make the TU-160 "Blackjack"? LOL!
I am an old SAC warrior. SAC- Strategic Air Command. Remember that from the Cold War era? And you comrade vaninec, where do you work?
foxsecret 3 years ago
Ha
Comrade, i am old USSR navy air defense officer
vaninec 3 years ago
and for "anticipation of land invasion"
why US have mil.bases in 110 countries???
vaninec 3 years ago
Because our allies love us and and trust us to help with their protection.
foxsecret 3 years ago
pshh. Russians tech is superior. and im speaking as an american too. The only reason they aren't a powerful nation is financial issues.
annihil8ted 2 years ago
If they are more supriour, the nhow come Russia developed the T-U4, Tu-95, TU-160 blackjack...all were copies of American aircraft the B-29, B-52 and the B-1 bomber.
I know the Russians can put out some good stuff these days but not as good as American.
Who knows, the way the US isn't buying new military aircraft anymore, The third world nations will soon beat the US in technology.
foxsecret 2 years ago
if you bothered to learn the facts, Tu-160 is not a copy of B-1, infact Tu-160 is in every way more superior to B-1.
Tu-160 is way different design, load, aerodynamic properties and combat stats than B-1.
....where did you get the information that TU-95 copied Americans?
pianoGeneral 2 years ago
Okay. The B-1 can carry 84 500 lbs bombs or 24 2000 bombs. It can carry ALCMs. It has three bombays while the TU-160 has two. The B-1 has seen combat from a couple of wars and the TU-160 none.
How much can the Tu-160 carry? The only advantage the TU-160 has over the B-1 it can fly faster and maybe....farther because it's so big. The B-1 has a 7000 mile range...what's the TU-160's The B-1 was introduced in the early 70's the TU-160 was introduced in the 80's. Are sure the B-1 wasn't copied?
foxsecret 2 years ago
Just put teh B-1 and the TU-160 next each other..one would think one copied the other. It doesn't take a rocket scientist. Like the TU-95, it looks like the B-52 with props.
B-1's avioncs can trick anyone itno thinking the plane is in a different location, If it gets caught on radar then it can blanket the who screen so it can be pin pointed.
foxsecret 2 years ago
TU-95 looks nothing like B-52.
and TU-160 carries more payload than B-1.
as Tu-160 is a long range,super-sonic, strategic nuclear bomber
B-1 is significantly smaller.
having less bomb bays dosnt make it smaller...
pianoGeneral 2 years ago
The B-1 has dropped more then 60% of the munitions in Iraq and Afghanistan. TU-160 hasn't even seen combat so what logic are you using to declare the TU-16- the winner over the B-1? The Tu-160 is for naw, FOR DISPALY USE ONLY. I bet those huge bombays have never been filled.
Just because the plane is bigger doesn't mean it's better.
foxsecret 2 years ago
You want see how tu-160 works? Really? So as your father was tought in school in times of antirussian propaganda, Hide under the table and cover with bedsheet.
Fedotof 2 years ago
If I want to know how a TU-160 works just go look at a B-1. has the TU-160 ever fired a shot in anger?
In case you didn't know, the Cold War was going on in the 60's then the next two decades. The only propaganda that was taught was in the USSR. The US did not keep their people in a Iron curtain against their own will. Nor did they shoot people escaping across the Berlin wall to get over to the West.
foxsecret 2 years ago
Thats doesnt change facts. US trend @stealths@ was developed by Ufimcev in Russia and stilled by americans.
And by the way, we live here and nobody so that "iron curtain" here. What the crap is that? Another US propaganda?
Fedotof 2 years ago
You know we makeing curtains from silk or sintetik or i dont know I`m not seamstress. My father was officer consultant in India, and we all was in another countries. What is iron curtain?
Fedotof 2 years ago
I onle hered that when "iron curtain" that was visible only for you as i understand falls, number of narkotics increase hundreds times, and we first time heard about pediks, transsecsuals and pedofiles.
Fedotof 2 years ago
God help us to repair iron curtain because my mail is full of spam letters that offer to increase penis 3 tymes or buy house in Singapur only for drilleon$s and im really scared of homo parades in eu. What if that homos became agressive???
Fedotof 2 years ago
I don't know about your assertion of the US getting stealth technology from the Soviets.
Other then that your English is too broken.
foxsecret 2 years ago
The IRON CURTAIN. It existed up until 1991 when the Soviet union collapsed. Russians couldn't travel freely and were forcibly kept in. That's why it was called the iron curtain.
You didn't know that did you? How much of the cold war do you know? Not enough I bet..where do you live?
foxsecret 2 years ago
I`m Russian. And we travel freely. And my parents too. And grandfather too. We didnt see any curtain. there is only curtain in your mind. I bet you know about cold war a lot cause its still going in USA. But not in Russia.
Fedotof 2 years ago
After 91 it was real hell. Our lifes was broken. We became poor, no food, no freedom, no literature, only propaganda telling that we all alcoholics. Before 91 in"iron curtain" was great. Free education, medicine
Fedotof 2 years ago
emagine it was free flats in USSR. no credit for 10 years, just wait your waiting list and you have flat. And after "iron curtain" falls, it was hell. Crisys was in 96(your propaganda tells that was most freedom moment in Russia)
Fedotof 2 years ago
Hope we will newer see US democracy again. Hope we will create this curtain as soon as candagars cocaine, pedics, democrats, we must stop that crap or it will kill us.
Fedotof 2 years ago
If yo don't like freedom that is your own choice. There are people here n the US who rely on government for their living and cannot take care of themselves and those of us who work hard for a living have to pay for them.
We don't want the Democrats so you can have them.
foxsecret 2 years ago
We love freedom and belive me after civil war that swept 20 millions people fighting for freedom we know what freedom is. But you think that freedom its right to fuck your girlfriend in the main street or to bee pedik. Our understanding of freedom is different
Fedotof 2 years ago
Hey! I don't like that either it's the liberals in the country who think they can do, define anything they want and do nothing to contribute to the civil society.
Most of us in the US aren't PERVERTS. But unfortunately there are cites like San Fransisco think they can live any way the like without consequences.
foxsecret 2 years ago
@foxsecret ya u gotta give Russia credit 4 not allowing those damn gays to go prancing around without a care perverting society
slapyousilly3 1 year ago
@slapyousilly3
Very true my friend
foxsecret 1 year ago
@foxsecret course communism may be bad in many ways but damn it at least they know to put a stop to freaking perversions
slapyousilly3 1 year ago
What an idiotism you talking to me that it wasnt free education in USSR. Im telling you. Im LIVE HERE IN RUSSIA idiot. Im telling you IT WAS. "travel freely were the KGB" My unkle was artist he was in half of the world.
Fedotof 2 years ago
God you are dull like log. Thats what TV made with people. Russian telling him that it was ok here, he is american live in another side of the earth know nothing about us telling that "no! it wasnt!" O god you so dull!
Fedotof 2 years ago
I don't watch TV because it's full of CRAP!
foxsecret 2 years ago
Friendship? Drushba!^_^
Fedotof 2 years ago
Yes I'm sure it was hell because our country have spent itself into oblivion and there wasn't any value to your currency. The US is going through but not as sever a similar situation that can ruin it financially.
You didn't have free education or medicine. That is one of the things that caused you to go broke. It's not free because everyone is paying for it through taxation. On top of that it was rationed just like you grocery store lines because there wasn't any food on he shelves.
foxsecret 2 years ago
Okay, so during the USSR times you can go anywhere you may...yeah right! The only Russians that could travel freely were the KGB and spies.
You all own the propaganda. Coming from Saul Alinsky and Karl Marx you all created an alter reality of a Utopian mindset. In reality you lived in crappy conditions but in your head it was Utopian.
Just curious, what did you think of Stalin? Was he good for he USSR?
foxsecret 2 years ago
And you are overloaded with propaganda. Emagine you telling that crap to me, Russian who live here, and you explain me that we was forcibly kept here what kind of idiot you are? Go tell that to your boyfriend, or girlfriend i dont know who you prefere soon as you are american
Fedotof 2 years ago
That is bull-Shovik!
Then how come there were so much defections of Russians escaping to the West and the US? What about that MIG 25 pilot who defected to Japan in 1976?
Must not have been that great of a Utopian place as you describe.
foxsecret 2 years ago
And USA stealths was developed by Russian scientist Ufimcev in 60s.
Fedotof 2 years ago
That is beautiful, it almost looks organic...
joesabido 3 years ago 4
The Russian fighter jets are just.. THE BEST..
Zapust 3 years ago 29
This comment has received too many negative votes show
oh yea fat ass well look at the f-22 bitch
ToughGuy914 3 years ago
Sorry but the F22 only has advanced avionics and high costs as it's primary functions.
osakanone 3 years ago 6
That's because they milked the program for twenty years. The plane first flew in the late 80's-early 90's and now just getting a squadron in service.
foxsecret 3 years ago
Toughguy914 i feel sorry for you
You don't seem to know anything!
BluffBlunt 3 years ago 2
how about i kick ur ass
ToughGuy914 3 years ago
f 22 raptor - fly like a fat dinosaur
moljar 3 years ago 2
@moljar Well no it doesn't fly like a fat dinosaur and if it fly's like any dinosaur it would be pterodactyl its not called a Raptor for nothing , the F22 is very vesitile, and don't go thinking its because i am an american or something like that just watch any video of it the technology on that bird is way ahead of most other aircraft
slapyousilly3 1 year ago
@slapyousilly3 i agree
moljar 1 year ago
@moljar glad u agree
slapyousilly3 1 year ago
@Zapust They are on par with US fighters...
dreammaker182 1 year ago
@dreammaker182 This is how it goes down.. USA makes a fighter jet.. Russia makes a fighter based on it.. They simply "Improve the best"... Or.. in American english.. "Steal"... I remember a fighter pilot saying he was chasing a Russian MiG and he said he saw maneuvers american fighterpilots could only dream about.. why? Russian fighter jets might not be the fastest or the most agile.. But they can take a serious punch! It takes allot of BOOM! to destroy a Russian fighter!
Zapust 1 year ago
@Zapust
A russian fighter can take as much as any fighter nowadays. A solid missile to the center of the plane and it's over. It's not like fighterjets are made of impenetrable steel, cause it hasn't been invented yet.
Shurryy 1 year ago
@Zapust None of what you have said is really right. They're rugged, ie. Mig-29 is less susceptible to fod .ect, but apart from that they're just as vulnerable to a missile.
As for basing their designs on US aircraft, that's not completely true either. MiG-25 -> F-15 -> Su-27...who "copied" who? There's no black and white.
MudRat02 1 year ago 2
@MudRat02 I'm not talkin about how much weapon punch it could take.. I'm talking about extreme maneuverability
Zapust 1 year ago
@Zapust @b101aa2 It is sad for Israel that the proponents of the Lavi rejected my un-detailed early 1987 proposal to add 3D vectoring to the Lavi, claiming that 3D-post-stall agility & maximized take-off/landing/flight-agility-safety & recovery is none-sense even after my 1st in aviation history flight tests of STVS (with 3D vectoring). [May 18, 1987 by Aviation Week. Facebook cite ["Benjamin Gal-Or"]. Their rejection failed the Lavi future, at least.
1Bengalor 1 year ago
@Zapust Tell it to my F119.
1SFODdelta 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
mine boyfreind can do this with his asshole muscles...I love him wery much...jajaja
MATAMERICA7777 4 years ago