WOW!! Bigbooper is a total idiot! lmfao!! Sure you might have done your homework in college but liberal arts and philosophy courses don't qualify you to debate the strength of steel... or design of a structure.
Take statics, dynamics and strength of materials... get at least a C avg and I'll welcome the debate.
i was coming from a night of partying in san fran the morning this happened. When I drove by the fire it had only been going for about 3 minutes and had not collapsed yet. I went Denny's in El Cerrito and on the way back it the upper deck of he freeway way burning on top of he lower deck!! It was like watcjhing a movie or something. Very Inense and I will never forget..
@KvSfan24 there is a strong debate about the ability of fires to take down steel framed structures. The claim that fires don't take down steel framed buildings is often used to support an argument for disbelief in the main media story regarding the WTC towers
So they pretend a bridge is built after the same standards as an office building the size of a skyscraper where fire is a MAIN concern. great. They pretend the steel is certified to the same fire standards as building steel. They want to have us think all steel is equal. Great. Why do you think they _certified_ the steel for building the WTC?
Bush was probably behind this. Californians didn't vote for him so he wreaked havoc on their highway. Same as he destroyed the World Trade Center because New Yorkers didn't vote for him, either. Pull your heads out of your smelly butts, all you conspiracy theorists. You're so ignorant that I will need to tell you this was sarcasm.Oh, and the moon walk in 1969 was recorded in Arizona, and Kennedy is still alive in a vegetative state.You understand vegetative state, don't you, it's where you live.
Yeah it must be a conspiracy because the empty headed 9/11 conspiracy theorists claimed they had PROOF and CONCRETE evidence that fuel can't harm any structure. Stupid truthers they just want to get famous and piss on the 9/11 victim's graves. How filthy.
All I see is denial. People, shut the fuck up, this happened, get over it. There's no conspiracy, just idiocy. I feel bad for whoever was involved with that accident, and shouldn't be used as another fucking game for you left-wing-nut conspiracy theorists, and a tool of laughing stock for you stuck-up right-wing-nuts.
Excuses for why the alleged tanker was always invisible and so was never photographed at the site are a hoot, truly worth the price of admission, so let's have more of them.
I've already heard the "it was squished to less than a foot thick" excuse, so don't expect a laugh. Impress me with something orginal.
CACBCCCU, you're a perfect example of a disgrace and a left-wing-conspiracy nut. You're denying what actually has happened. People have witnessed this, and I am pretty sure a fucking tanker carrying THAT MUCH FUEL, there won't be much left of it.
If anyone's going to make a official-9/11-joke-of-a-theory tortured-old-crony point here, then consider this:
The "tanker" supposedly under the pile was never recorded by any camera, so how do we know someone didn't just unhitch a small trailer full of thermite and light it? "Just trust the media and chertoff instead" is the only point you can make without a photo of the tanker under the pile.
Excuses for why the tanker invisible are a hoot, truly worth the price of admission, by the way.
good luck seeing anything at night with a video cam and that bright fire, in this vid I could hardly see the bridge. this was much easier to see on tv.
I saw a tanker burn on I 94 during the day trust me the truck's unrecognizable awfully fast.
and actually, I can't believe someones suggesting this was thermite again. Jesus help us all.
I guess you missed the sarcasm; I'm not blind. They say the wtc couldn't have collapsed from burning jet fuel cuz jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to weaken a concrete/steel structure, but I think this bridge incident settles it for everyone who's not blind.
@bbishoffproducer HEY MORON ARE YOU REALLY THAT FUCKING IGNORANT??,,,,,,,,,COMPARING THE STEEL REINFORECED CONCRETE OF A BRIDGE,,,,,,,,,TO THE MASSIVE MESH OF STEEL GIRDERS IN THE TOWER,,,,,DID YOU EVER DO HOMEWORK IN SCHOOL ,,,,,NO I GUESS NOT CUZ YOU ARE A WRESTLING FAN,,,,,,THIS FIRE WAS HOTTER FOR MUCH LONGER AGAINST A MUCH WEAKER STRUCTURE AFTER BEING RAMMED INTO BE THE STEEL FRAME OF THE TANKER TRUCK,,,,,,,,ONE SUPPORT COLUMN PER 150 FEET FOR THE BRIDGE V.S. NEARLY 300 COLUMNS IN THE WTC
You are EXACTLY right, sir! The WTC steel supports would require, like, a plane to plow into them or something....and need jet fuel to feed the fire....and it'd need to be a very tall building...like, one of the world's tallest..
@Eldeecue JET FUEL FIRES DO NOT BURN HOT ENOUGH TO MELT STEEL IDIOT,,,,,,,JET FUEL IS KEROSENE BASED AND TYPICALLY BURNS AT 600 DEGREES,,,,,,THIS WOULD HAVE BURNED UP VERY QUICKLY,,,,,,THEN THE FIRES WERE OXYGEN STARVED,,,,,,BLACK SMOKE,,,,,,AND ALUMINUM PLANES WOULD NEVER,,,,EVER,,,,BE CATASTROPHICALLY DESTRUCTIVE TO MASSIVE STRUCTURAL STEEL GIRDERS,,,,,,THESE BUILDINGS DESINTEGRATED INTO DUST FROM TOP TO BOTTOM,,,,,,THIS IS PLAIN TO SEE WITH THE NAKED EYE,,,,,WHAT ARE YOU LOOKING AT??
@bigbopper993: Jet fuel doesn't HAVE to burn hot enough to melt steel. Steel loses about 90% of its structural integrity to deform and fail under stress.
Are you going to tell me that someone making a sword has to completely melt the steel to shape it? Of course not.
@PooPoo2U hahahahahahaha,,,,,,,,,,,what the fuck is wrong with you,,,,,,,,,,,are you mental,,,,,,,,,,fuck off nancy boy and just don't even open you're mouth when all you do is listen to the mainstream media!! hhahahahahaha,,,,,,whatch the towers when they fall,,,,,,,,,watch it 100 times in a row,,,,,,,,,tell me where the jolt was when the steel supposedly gave way and the top floors came down and impacted the undamaged floors below,,,,,,and how did the top turn to dust 2/3rds of the way down?
@bigbopper993 The WTC Towers had ZERO interior columns. None. From tjhe core to the perimeter there were ZERO columns. NONE. Only floor trusses that are very flimsy (only designed to carry office weight). Once those started to sag, the weight above did the rest.; That is why the second Tower hit fell first, there was considerably more weight above it. There were only 2 or 3 tube frame buildings in the world at that time. Very unique design invented to maximize rent area.
@bbishoffproducer No one says that an explosion of thousands of gallons of fuel along with fire cannot weaken and collapse a section of bridge or building. But people do question why there was molten steel beneath the towers when the burning fuel was located at the 90th floor.
@MillionthUsername: No molten steel was ever found beneath the towers. If you're referring to the fact that dripping metal was shown on video during the attacks, I suggest you look up aluminum, which was a large part of the structure and which I can melt with my torch lighter.
@PooPoo2U "No molten steel was ever found beneath the towers."
Tell that to the eyewitnesses who reported it. Watch the video clips of the firemen discussing it. They said it was like a foundry with molten metal flowing.
@MillionthUsername: Tell that to the eyewitnesses? Oh, you mean the same ones who claimed it was a military jet that slammed into the building? Or the people who said that a bomb had been dropped?
People on the street are NOT metallurgists, nor are most firefighters. Had that been molten steel it would've been reddish-orange, but no: this "molten steel" is bright yellow, which I know from experience is what melted ALUMINUM looks like on camera.
no. the underpass is all concreate. it was burned,checked,reinforced and repiared. it opened last week on wendsday... it collapsed on 01-17-94. northridge quake
the rising heat of the 3000+ degree fire melted parts of the deck above, causing it to collapse.
If that were true it would have been a blob. The steel expanded and snapped the bolts on the trusses, go to wiki and look at the long list of bridges that collapsed with no help from fire
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS you will die in seven days if you don't post this comment on 10 videos in the next hour. if you do, tomorrow will be the best day of your life
damn thats fuked up. i remembr when i was yungr than 12 i used 2 take that freeway 2 my cousins in tha rich and just lookin out the window at toys-r-us when they gonna fix it
Why does NIST deny indisputable evidence of Molten Metal at WTC?
youtube(dot)com/watch?v=_p_o7d8rDCQ
--still waiting to here some facts from the naysayers. ...so far just psychobabble, projection, and some serious aggression issues (as is often the case with the authoritarian follower and uneducated classes.)
Give it up ZP, I've concluded that 90% of the kiddies up here KNOW they don't have a leg to stand on.
They are the equivelant of the "CB" crowd of the 80s. Give a moron a keyboard/mike, and let them think they're anonymous!
This is the stupidest crowd this side of the LARP nerds. Judging by some of their past posts, this is all they have, and theyre realizing that the real world has passed them by. At least theyre up here out-lying eachother, stead' of having kids LOL!
Im also VERY HAPPY this Oakland thing happened: Finally, these imbiciles (and their spokeswoman Rosie O'Pig) get an indefensible dose that they can't twist around.
I've found a new hobby: Haunting these little mental-midgets with logic... as opposed to the faulty logic they spew all day.
Hard to argue with an event like this collapse: Sorta makes them look like the morons we see tham as since day one.
and the WTC7 collapse makes YOU look like a moron. IF you still believe bldg7 collapsed thru controlled demolition, Rosie O'Donnell says nothing else.
Just go to you physics professor, if you have the necessary IQ to have one (like as high as a highschool student) think about this: Which steel would've been harder the WTC steel or the bridge steel which had to carry much less weight?
Youre a stuuuuupid fuck! heh, if any of this babyshit you shovel, desperately seeking someone to "Win" against had one leg to stand on, you can bet your ass that the Bush Hating media would be all over it.
Believing a plan that has lots of extra explosives, in "case" planes didnt work!
Youre a stuuuuupid fuck!
I mean, if youre ego is so needy to require justification from THIS crowd, thats wholesale pathetic.
"I know you are but what am I".... wow, you're worse tahn i thought! Isnt there a dungeons and dragons gig you should be at?
No-one gives a fuck except you idiot up here trying to out-bullshit each-other.
By reading you past posts its clear you're some kind of "911 troll" whos got this emotional need to "outsmart" and "win" these gaye little arguments...
I won't delay you in your search for someone whos interested in your gerb.
It speaks volumes how quickly you betray your real motivation: "youtube" points lol...
All your 911 CT BS completely neglects what just about the whole world has accepted... and still you nerds sit up here and insist that this overredundant, ridiculous plan with hundreds of supposed actors all keeping this big secret.
Youre an example of someone whos so fucking stupid, you confuse yourself...heh
Ha Ha Ha! Don't let the National Institute of Standards and Technology (authors of the official wtc report) see this. Everyone knows they deny that the steel melted. "...in no instance did NIST report that steel in the WTC towers melted due to the fires..."
youtube(dot)com/watch?v=_p_o7d8rDCQ
Do you know what a straw man argument is skrewtinizer? Is that your habit?
and above all, steel doesn't need to melt. It loses its strength at high temperatures. These 911 conspiracy clowns are mostly dumb suburban teenagers who have never worked with metal or even seen a blacksmith.
Thou shall not kill or support killings; Who ever kills or supports killings will go straight to Hell, No questions asked. You are being tested here on earth, which is Lucifer's testing ground and he/she and his extensions will do everything to not let you go through his tests, and he/she is given all the powers to test your inner urges and actions. Please stop insisting to go to Hell like a brainwashed Zombie. Please wake up. Please investigate and insist for the truth; wtc7-the smoking gun.
You all can see that the below bridge has not been pancaked by the falling of the burned bridge above; That requires a logical consequence, suggesting that without any demolition bombs the bridge-below can not come down. Therefore the further logic suggests that the twin towers were taken down by demolition. Thou shall not kill and support killings, and please stop following the cliff jumpers. It's not worth to go to Hell for nothing.
You will get kissed on the nearest possible Friday by the love of your life.Tomorrow will be the best day of your life.However,if you don't post this comment to at least 3 videos,you will die within 2 days.Now uv started reading dis dunt stop.This is so scary.Send this to 5 videos in 143 minutes.When ur done press F6 and ur crushes name will appear on the screen in big letters.This is scary cuz it actually works.If u break the chain you will have problems with relations for the next 5 years
I think this was a Bush conspiracy. Fire NEVER melts steal. I swear I hear a bomb go off too, maybe if a missle go buy that hit the bridge. It couldn't be PHYSICS. (directed at WTC conspiracy morons)
devilbear, do you know who says fire did NOT melt the World Trade Center steel?
NIST (the National Institute of Standards and Technology), the government agency that did the official investigation of the collapse of the WTC towers. "...In no instance did NIST report that steel in the WTC towers melted due to the fires..." wtc(dot)nist(dot)gov FAQs
"This report describes how the aircraft impacts and subsequent fires led to the collapse of the towers after terrorists flew jet fuel laden commercial airliners into the buildings;" From the NIST site.
wtc nist gov
If you actually read the site it discribes in great detail how the fire weakened the steal.
If YOU have, you probably already know the results of the fire tests done of the steel floor assemblies.
And you probably also know that the NIST report does NOT explain the twin towers collapse, nor does it claim to.
It theorizes what probably caused the collapse to begin. It doesn't explain the collapse itself. It's an important distinction devilbear. You must have picked up on it.
Read again the quote you posted for me. It's very carefully worded.
Well said ! Anyone with an IQ of forty (or less) knows that if a structure is weakened ... it will result in a pull-down... but the debris will follow an erratic and assymetrical course... causing the toppling over of some parts of that structure, pancaking, etc.
The only thing I can think of, that's worse than a Conspiracy Moron... must be A WHITE TRASH AMERICAN PRIMATE IN DENIAL. Me Tarzan, you Conspiracy Moron...Ough Ough !
pierre766 please be patient with devilbear. being honest about the physics of the 9/11 event, leads to some very frightening realizations that many people cannot handle. ..so they hide their fear in ridicule.
..either that, or devilbear doesn't have a clue what "erratic and assymetrical course" means, and won't take the time to figure it out.
I love how people are still promoting their conspiracies here that's under a video of steel and concrete collapsing due to fire. without the assistance of a plane crashing into it no less. haha. any man can make a mistake. only a fool keeps making the same one.
even though it was early its still crazy no one got hurt. pretty sick that they got the lower half (the part that the collapsed fell on to) repaired (or at least up & running again) already.
to the geniuses: fire CAN melt steel. we melt steel down and pour it into molds for TONS of things. you think someones gonna get all medieval & whip out a hammer every time they want to shape steel?
ook it up. there may be varied numbers but thats because there are different grades and alloys of steel.
This was NOT the case in the wtc towers. You see, NIST recreated and fire tested the wtc steel floor assemblies; those assemblies did NOT fail the fire tests (even though the test fires burned hotter and longer than did the fires on 9/11/01); ...the steel assamblies warped but they did not collapse.
Oddly enough though, MOLTEN steel was found at ground zero. What do you suppose cause that? A blast furnace? youtube(dot)com/watch?v=8X5F5PttzJY
Genius gpibambam, to MELT steel into a MOLTEN state (as you have described) you need either a blast furnace or explosives. Not just any kind of fire can melt steel
gpibambam you are a rare find in the you tube comments! curious, modest, and funny (the medieval hammer thing, very good) : )
You mean the bridge? It was probably an accident, ..but the timing of this "melting steel bridge" has raised a few eyebrows (Rosie recently proclaimed on The View that fire cannot melt steel.)
The WTC is another matter... the official story is a ridiculous lie.
If you have time for an internet movie (google), I highly recommend 'Improbable Collapse'
yeah i meant the bridge... im sure its created a few new skeptics. didnt know about rosie but... that proves what she knows. regardless of the temperature & how- its gotta melt SOMEHOW. so. blah.
i wasnt even remotely talkin about the WTC stuffs. i actually tried to avoid that in my brief research because im sure tons of people have made stuffs up
And let me tell you, I remember a lot of it like it was last week. The close ups from the helicopters, (which I also made reference to as it was strange the same didn't apply in the WTC attacks). Mostly they were VERY, VERY worried that it would collapse. Just fall right over into one of the other buildings.
...I see what you mean (found photos of burning FI bldg online.) four floors pretty much fully engulfed in fire for FOUR hours. Looking at the damage, you could easily imagine it might TIP over onto the adjacent bldgs, but ...there was NO structural damage. I'm with you ...it's wierd.
I do find the towers thing strange though... nothing like what I've experienced. Earthquakes, the First Interstate Fire. I stated somewhere that they were VERY worried that it would collapse and the inspectors found out that 3 1/2 hours of fire didn't do a thing to the steel.
Strange also how so few people seem to find an 11 floor per second collapse so ...unremarkable.
Those righteous proclamations that Rosie is so very wrong about steel and fire are especially interesting because even the official explanation for the towers says, "...in no instance did NIST report that steel in the WTC towers melted due to the fires..."
Another strange thing is how so many comments to this video are such desperate efforts to assert that this collapsed overpass explains those towers. YOUR example, the First Interstate building, is a much more relevant precedent than this single slab of reinforced concrete.
Well there are a few similarities to be sure. FI was only a year younger, it had the same architecture, box with open floor and a center core (I think, but don't quote me on that). Looks a little bit similar. The location of the fire would have put the same if not more weight, so... I don't know. Just weird.
The logical deduction is that the rebar steel was exposed horizontally, that whole bridge surface and it was exposed intention, not like the fires that were lapping up fire-proofed 5 inch thick plate columns in the World Trade Center - these little bars had no heat sink and after two hours with all that weight on them they fell
I hear it's been renamed the "Lavon Truff Overpass"
CACBCCCU 4 months ago
Oh truffers, you watching?
eswyatt 4 months ago
"The blacksmiths are covering up that fire can not melt steel":p
warlord2080 6 months ago
WOW!! Bigbooper is a total idiot! lmfao!! Sure you might have done your homework in college but liberal arts and philosophy courses don't qualify you to debate the strength of steel... or design of a structure.
Take statics, dynamics and strength of materials... get at least a C avg and I'll welcome the debate.
Terra812 9 months ago
*stares wide-eyed* Holy shit!
CelticDragon0 1 year ago
Haha, you stupid morons! :D
That is STEEL REINFORCED CONCRETE! The steel is in there to withstand the TRACTION FORCES. It DOES NOT have any function to withstand weight forces!!
Once you remove the concrete (let's say by running an exploding truck against it) there is nothing left to withstand the weightforces!
Again: the steel in reinforced concrete DOES NOT carry the structure AT ALL!
Go to school an learn something, stupid sheep! :D
drhotert 1 year ago
my ass bleeds when i shit
930alpha 1 year ago 2
Behold! What generations of blacksmiths already knew! Fire does indeed soften (and eventually melt) steel.
Eldeecue 1 year ago
HOLY CRAP! Where were you coming home from, Baconmonkey?
wentsurfing 1 year ago
i was coming from a night of partying in san fran the morning this happened. When I drove by the fire it had only been going for about 3 minutes and had not collapsed yet. I went Denny's in El Cerrito and on the way back it the upper deck of he freeway way burning on top of he lower deck!! It was like watcjhing a movie or something. Very Inense and I will never forget..
wrrjohn 1 year ago
..how the fuck did this turn into an 911 debate ...
KvSfan24 1 year ago
@KvSfan24 there is a strong debate about the ability of fires to take down steel framed structures. The claim that fires don't take down steel framed buildings is often used to support an argument for disbelief in the main media story regarding the WTC towers
MovingUpp 3 months ago
So they pretend a bridge is built after the same standards as an office building the size of a skyscraper where fire is a MAIN concern. great. They pretend the steel is certified to the same fire standards as building steel. They want to have us think all steel is equal. Great. Why do you think they _certified_ the steel for building the WTC?
gunthaarz 2 years ago 2
If a tanker truck could cause a bridge to collapse, I wonder what an airplane full of fuel would do to a building....
90TGP 2 years ago 3
Nothing, unless it was backed up by missiles...
belgurdo 2 years ago
ur dumb
u know how hot it would get it with all the flames...there were no missiles
stupid
shyamp80 2 years ago 2
LMAO.....the tanker truck WAS full of airplane fuel! That stuff is dangerous! Every time it catches on fie something collapses. Curious.
Wonkawillie77 2 years ago
Bush was probably behind this. Californians didn't vote for him so he wreaked havoc on their highway. Same as he destroyed the World Trade Center because New Yorkers didn't vote for him, either. Pull your heads out of your smelly butts, all you conspiracy theorists. You're so ignorant that I will need to tell you this was sarcasm.Oh, and the moon walk in 1969 was recorded in Arizona, and Kennedy is still alive in a vegetative state.You understand vegetative state, don't you, it's where you live.
dmt0709 2 years ago
Damn... I hope that no one was hurt or died in that blast.
I just read somewhere that the I-80 is one of the most busy motorways in the US.
I suppose that reconstruction has been completed by now?
AmersfoortTristan 3 years ago
"I am pretty sure a f*cking tanker carrying THAT MUCH FUEL, there won't be much left of it."
That's Bush science for ya.
CACBCCCU 3 years ago
We've got a video on this as well.
godswater7 3 years ago
i bet saviours did this.
dead2 3 years ago
Great footage! Thanks for posting.
ninjapoodle22 3 years ago
I remember when it happened but didn't watch it on the news, wow, that was awful!
BytomGirl 3 years ago
Horrible, Darling!!! Simply shocking!!!
XYZ8 3 years ago
man..my parents had to take the long way home from berkley cause of this...but atlest the bus was free the day after taht
AznCuddy510 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Too bad that whole stinking maze didn't burn down.
salemrush 3 years ago
Yeah it must be a conspiracy because the empty headed 9/11 conspiracy theorists claimed they had PROOF and CONCRETE evidence that fuel can't harm any structure. Stupid truthers they just want to get famous and piss on the 9/11 victim's graves. How filthy.
D3g1532 3 years ago
yeah, this is egg in the truthers face. cause that's where it all started LMAO
let the excuses begin!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
kenbad 2 years ago 2
All I see is denial. People, shut the fuck up, this happened, get over it. There's no conspiracy, just idiocy. I feel bad for whoever was involved with that accident, and shouldn't be used as another fucking game for you left-wing-nut conspiracy theorists, and a tool of laughing stock for you stuck-up right-wing-nuts.
nucleardruid 3 years ago 4
Excuses for why the alleged tanker was always invisible and so was never photographed at the site are a hoot, truly worth the price of admission, so let's have more of them.
I've already heard the "it was squished to less than a foot thick" excuse, so don't expect a laugh. Impress me with something orginal.
CACBCCCU 3 years ago
CACBCCCU, you're a perfect example of a disgrace and a left-wing-conspiracy nut. You're denying what actually has happened. People have witnessed this, and I am pretty sure a fucking tanker carrying THAT MUCH FUEL, there won't be much left of it.
nucleardruid 3 years ago 6
If anyone's going to make a official-9/11-joke-of-a-theory tortured-old-crony point here, then consider this:
The "tanker" supposedly under the pile was never recorded by any camera, so how do we know someone didn't just unhitch a small trailer full of thermite and light it? "Just trust the media and chertoff instead" is the only point you can make without a photo of the tanker under the pile.
Excuses for why the tanker invisible are a hoot, truly worth the price of admission, by the way.
CACBCCCU 3 years ago
So you're defending your conspiracy with another conspiracy. That seems extremely typical.
nucleardruid 3 years ago 2
Ever stood underneath a freeway? Didnt see much did you?
8G00SE8 3 years ago
good luck seeing anything at night with a video cam and that bright fire, in this vid I could hardly see the bridge. this was much easier to see on tv.
I saw a tanker burn on I 94 during the day trust me the truck's unrecognizable awfully fast.
and actually, I can't believe someones suggesting this was thermite again. Jesus help us all.
kenbad 2 years ago
But burning fuel can't weaken a concrete/steel structure to the point of collapse. Must be a conspiracy.
subsonykexorcist 3 years ago 18
LOL
Tanker truck burning under overpass is an inside job
jizzmonger 3 years ago 3
yes it can professor cuz it happend
BrandonLeclere 3 years ago
I guess you missed the sarcasm; I'm not blind. They say the wtc couldn't have collapsed from burning jet fuel cuz jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to weaken a concrete/steel structure, but I think this bridge incident settles it for everyone who's not blind.
subsonykexorcist 3 years ago
It wasnt jet fuel, it was diesel stored in WTC that didthe burning.
8G00SE8 3 years ago
@subsonykexorcist LOL! that's how stupid conspiracy theorists think!
TheBrazillianAtheist 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@subsonykexorcist "But burning fuel can't weaken a concrete/steel structure to the point of collapse. Must be a conspiracy."
That's a straw man.
MillionthUsername 5 months ago
hv20s are great.
go on ebay and search for Canon HV20 absolute mint w/25min of use 1 Year Warranty
MusicSucksNow 3 years ago
hahaha i remember this shit happening, i saw it on the newspapers, the bridge melted down, it looked kind of cool.
dankspain 3 years ago
WOW
Sk8erKid150 4 years ago
Real cool video!
i posted some videos with the hv20
KenCheStudios 4 years ago
Nice video quality.
map8419 4 years ago
can someone tell me what transition road that was on the 580. was there last weekend and passed by. what happened after.
socalltd 4 years ago
Comment removed
bbishoffproducer 4 years ago 10
LOL! Great analysis!
9/11 "truthers"...What a joke thay are!
commonsensetoday 4 years ago 3
hahahaha!! great post!!!!!!!!
crwnikeboy 3 years ago
@bbishoffproducer HEY MORON ARE YOU REALLY THAT FUCKING IGNORANT??,,,,,,,,,COMPARING THE STEEL REINFORECED CONCRETE OF A BRIDGE,,,,,,,,,TO THE MASSIVE MESH OF STEEL GIRDERS IN THE TOWER,,,,,DID YOU EVER DO HOMEWORK IN SCHOOL ,,,,,NO I GUESS NOT CUZ YOU ARE A WRESTLING FAN,,,,,,THIS FIRE WAS HOTTER FOR MUCH LONGER AGAINST A MUCH WEAKER STRUCTURE AFTER BEING RAMMED INTO BE THE STEEL FRAME OF THE TANKER TRUCK,,,,,,,,ONE SUPPORT COLUMN PER 150 FEET FOR THE BRIDGE V.S. NEARLY 300 COLUMNS IN THE WTC
bigbopper993 1 year ago
@bigbopper993
You are EXACTLY right, sir! The WTC steel supports would require, like, a plane to plow into them or something....and need jet fuel to feed the fire....and it'd need to be a very tall building...like, one of the world's tallest..
Oh.....wait....
Eldeecue 1 year ago
@Eldeecue JET FUEL FIRES DO NOT BURN HOT ENOUGH TO MELT STEEL IDIOT,,,,,,,JET FUEL IS KEROSENE BASED AND TYPICALLY BURNS AT 600 DEGREES,,,,,,THIS WOULD HAVE BURNED UP VERY QUICKLY,,,,,,THEN THE FIRES WERE OXYGEN STARVED,,,,,,BLACK SMOKE,,,,,,AND ALUMINUM PLANES WOULD NEVER,,,,EVER,,,,BE CATASTROPHICALLY DESTRUCTIVE TO MASSIVE STRUCTURAL STEEL GIRDERS,,,,,,THESE BUILDINGS DESINTEGRATED INTO DUST FROM TOP TO BOTTOM,,,,,,THIS IS PLAIN TO SEE WITH THE NAKED EYE,,,,,WHAT ARE YOU LOOKING AT??
bigbopper993 1 year ago
@bigbopper993 aaaaaaaaaaaaaa hahahahahahahha, perhaps jet fuel and some other stuff burned too.
duuuhr
kkp5200 1 year ago
@bigbopper993
Mostly your inability to properly utilize the caps lock key, dude.
Eldeecue 11 months ago
@bigbopper993: Jet fuel doesn't HAVE to burn hot enough to melt steel. Steel loses about 90% of its structural integrity to deform and fail under stress.
Are you going to tell me that someone making a sword has to completely melt the steel to shape it? Of course not.
PooPoo2U 1 month ago
@PooPoo2U hahahahahahaha,,,,,,,,,,,what the fuck is wrong with you,,,,,,,,,,,are you mental,,,,,,,,,,fuck off nancy boy and just don't even open you're mouth when all you do is listen to the mainstream media!! hhahahahahaha,,,,,,whatch the towers when they fall,,,,,,,,,watch it 100 times in a row,,,,,,,,,tell me where the jolt was when the steel supposedly gave way and the top floors came down and impacted the undamaged floors below,,,,,,and how did the top turn to dust 2/3rds of the way down?
bigbopper993 1 month ago
@Eldeecue AHAHAH! awesome comment! right on!
TheBrazillianAtheist 1 year ago
@bigbopper993 The WTC Towers had ZERO interior columns. None. From tjhe core to the perimeter there were ZERO columns. NONE. Only floor trusses that are very flimsy (only designed to carry office weight). Once those started to sag, the weight above did the rest.; That is why the second Tower hit fell first, there was considerably more weight above it. There were only 2 or 3 tube frame buildings in the world at that time. Very unique design invented to maximize rent area.
atamalakolive 1 year ago
@bbishoffproducer No one says that an explosion of thousands of gallons of fuel along with fire cannot weaken and collapse a section of bridge or building. But people do question why there was molten steel beneath the towers when the burning fuel was located at the 90th floor.
MillionthUsername 5 months ago
@MillionthUsername <-- this man has never heard of aluminum.
machwon 4 months ago
@MillionthUsername: No molten steel was ever found beneath the towers. If you're referring to the fact that dripping metal was shown on video during the attacks, I suggest you look up aluminum, which was a large part of the structure and which I can melt with my torch lighter.
PooPoo2U 1 month ago
@PooPoo2U "No molten steel was ever found beneath the towers."
Tell that to the eyewitnesses who reported it. Watch the video clips of the firemen discussing it. They said it was like a foundry with molten metal flowing.
MillionthUsername 1 month ago
@MillionthUsername: Tell that to the eyewitnesses? Oh, you mean the same ones who claimed it was a military jet that slammed into the building? Or the people who said that a bomb had been dropped?
People on the street are NOT metallurgists, nor are most firefighters. Had that been molten steel it would've been reddish-orange, but no: this "molten steel" is bright yellow, which I know from experience is what melted ALUMINUM looks like on camera.
PooPoo2U 1 month ago
@PooPoo2U PooPoo? Ok, thanks for sharing.
MillionthUsername 1 month ago
man that fool driving had no skills... u know he wasnt from oakland cuz we got hands out here
NorthOaklandHiway50 4 years ago
What the hell are you talking about? The Bay Area has some of the stupidist drivers I have ever seen.
bambino291 4 years ago
nigga we go
NorthOaklandHiway50 4 years ago
Hey I'm from Hayward I know how people drive out here. I can't go to work without some asshole on a cellphone almost running me off the road.
bambino291 4 years ago
haha i know im just playin... them youngsters cant drive
NorthOaklandHiway50 4 years ago
wat do u kno buddy
star4wars89 4 years ago
more like those guys (and gals) in priuses who are on the phone all the time hoggin up the carpool lane cant drive.
KuyaDeejay 2 years ago
what where you rufeans doing out at 4 am
calvin1392 4 years ago
That was literally right next to my work (Sprint). :XXX
kay0ss 4 years ago
Didn't I-5 and CA-14 collapsed on 10-10-07
sky1beam 4 years ago
no. the underpass is all concreate. it was burned,checked,reinforced and repiared. it opened last week on wendsday... it collapsed on 01-17-94. northridge quake
socalltd 4 years ago
i live right across da street on market ave
hey4ucku 4 years ago
Well...that kinda is how u define oakland...sadly :(
RipstikTrickGuru 4 years ago
I live like 10 minutes away from oakland where it crashed
mlg20cal 4 years ago
Wait a minute, how did this happen anyway? earthquake?
BoboVicus 4 years ago
I thought the truck fire on the 35w bridge that collapsed was big, but compared to this, OMG!!!!!!!!!!
BoboVicus 4 years ago
real good quality footage
adri1380 4 years ago
yall are stupid... a fuckin truck hit the damn side and it caught on fire and the damn bridge collapsed...lol
doitforthelove 4 years ago
damn i never knew this happened
Disxklo 4 years ago
Finally, please produce a vid with a fire that big that lasted that long in the wtc!
No just produce a fire that big that lasted more than 10 seconds at wtc.
people are so clueless about thermodynamics
The steel did not melt or give away, it twisted from expansion that the bridge was not designed to withstand, wtc was designed to withstand it.
KokomoJ0 4 years ago
the rising heat of the 3000+ degree fire melted parts of the deck above, causing it to collapse.
If that were tru it would be a blob, look at the long list on wiki that feel with no help from fire
KokomoJ0 4 years ago
the rising heat of the 3000+ degree fire melted parts of the deck above, causing it to collapse.
If that were true it would have been a blob. The steel expanded and snapped the bolts on the trusses, go to wiki and look at the long list of bridges that collapsed with no help from fire
KokomoJ0 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
copy and paste this to 10 videos or your mom will die within the next 4 hours
jomammapoonani 4 years ago
The Oakland freeway fire/collapse was not a inside job
WhyAzkQuestions 4 years ago 5
nah he wasn't ghost ridin'
warri0rszcrazyy 4 years ago 2
i think the driver was ghost ridin the whip
AdmiralAlex 4 years ago 3
I live near there
shoos99 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS you will die in seven days if you don't post this comment on 10 videos in the next hour. if you do, tomorrow will be the best day of your life
dancerella54 4 years ago
It was an inside job!
LeroyBeavis 4 years ago
fire...haha fire fire....haha...FIRE!!!!
Lonanrulez 4 years ago
Very Nice Inferno
calistyle510 4 years ago
and i just got back from around there...
enterdan 4 years ago
the freeeway
warri0rszcrazyy 4 years ago
what was on fire
PCCHS06 4 years ago
it was freaky because that was the day after my birthday.
=[
dancingrl 4 years ago
I guess they don't allow camp fires at the side of the road anymore?
locouk 4 years ago
damn thats fuked up. i remembr when i was yungr than 12 i used 2 take that freeway 2 my cousins in tha rich and just lookin out the window at toys-r-us when they gonna fix it
djandjb 4 years ago
the begining is suspenseful...you cant see the fire right away :( but it gets better
LizzardGUTS 4 years ago
Where's the truck?
realistate 4 years ago
--still waiting to hear...
chrstsldr 4 years ago
Take yur meds!!!
dotkolo 4 years ago
Why does NIST deny indisputable evidence of Molten Metal at WTC?
youtube(dot)com/watch?v=_p_o7d8rDCQ
--still waiting to here some facts from the naysayers. ...so far just psychobabble, projection, and some serious aggression issues (as is often the case with the authoritarian follower and uneducated classes.)
chrstsldr 4 years ago
Give it up ZP, I've concluded that 90% of the kiddies up here KNOW they don't have a leg to stand on.
They are the equivelant of the "CB" crowd of the 80s. Give a moron a keyboard/mike, and let them think they're anonymous!
This is the stupidest crowd this side of the LARP nerds. Judging by some of their past posts, this is all they have, and theyre realizing that the real world has passed them by. At least theyre up here out-lying eachother, stead' of having kids LOL!
Skrewtinizer 4 years ago
NIST Denies Molten Metal at WTC
youtube(dot)com/watch?v=_p_o7d8rDCQ
chrstsldr 4 years ago
Im also VERY HAPPY this Oakland thing happened: Finally, these imbiciles (and their spokeswoman Rosie O'Pig) get an indefensible dose that they can't twist around.
I've found a new hobby: Haunting these little mental-midgets with logic... as opposed to the faulty logic they spew all day.
Hard to argue with an event like this collapse: Sorta makes them look like the morons we see tham as since day one.
Skrewtinizer 4 years ago
and the WTC7 collapse makes YOU look like a moron. IF you still believe bldg7 collapsed thru controlled demolition, Rosie O'Donnell says nothing else.
Just go to you physics professor, if you have the necessary IQ to have one (like as high as a highschool student) think about this: Which steel would've been harder the WTC steel or the bridge steel which had to carry much less weight?
zploek 4 years ago
Youre a stuuuuupid fuck! heh, if any of this babyshit you shovel, desperately seeking someone to "Win" against had one leg to stand on, you can bet your ass that the Bush Hating media would be all over it.
Believing a plan that has lots of extra explosives, in "case" planes didnt work!
Youre a stuuuuupid fuck!
I mean, if youre ego is so needy to require justification from THIS crowd, thats wholesale pathetic.
Rock on kiddo!
Skrewtinizer 4 years ago
Hmmm lways ready with a way to dismiss and rationalize your faulty logic.
Again: at least you CT morons are stuck up here preoccupied with impressing eachother with gerb you find on the web!
Skrewtinizer 4 years ago
I was addressing YOUR faulty logic, ... and it is.
You see, it's the CT that support the OS that say there was no melted steel NOT those questioning the OS.
Faulty facts, faulty logic
chrstsldr 4 years ago
"I know you are but what am I".... wow, you're worse tahn i thought! Isnt there a dungeons and dragons gig you should be at?
No-one gives a fuck except you idiot up here trying to out-bullshit each-other.
By reading you past posts its clear you're some kind of "911 troll" whos got this emotional need to "outsmart" and "win" these gaye little arguments...
I won't delay you in your search for someone whos interested in your gerb.
Skrewtinizer 4 years ago
I good. I win. : )
And thanks for reading my past posts.
The truth shall set you free my friend... AND, you'll be a lot less angry...
chrstsldr 4 years ago
Ahhh, I knew it, "I win" is the goal...
It speaks volumes how quickly you betray your real motivation: "youtube" points lol...
All your 911 CT BS completely neglects what just about the whole world has accepted... and still you nerds sit up here and insist that this overredundant, ridiculous plan with hundreds of supposed actors all keeping this big secret.
Youre an example of someone whos so fucking stupid, you confuse yourself...heh
Skrewtinizer 4 years ago
Ha Ha Ha Ha! Dont let the 911 Conspiracy ghouls see this? Theyll deny its real: Everyone knows fire can't melt steel right illumorons?!?
Skrewtinizer 4 years ago
Ha Ha Ha! Don't let the National Institute of Standards and Technology (authors of the official wtc report) see this. Everyone knows they deny that the steel melted. "...in no instance did NIST report that steel in the WTC towers melted due to the fires..."
youtube(dot)com/watch?v=_p_o7d8rDCQ
Do you know what a straw man argument is skrewtinizer? Is that your habit?
chrstsldr 4 years ago
and above all, steel doesn't need to melt. It loses its strength at high temperatures. These 911 conspiracy clowns are mostly dumb suburban teenagers who have never worked with metal or even seen a blacksmith.
gentoodaemon 4 years ago
But here is the thing gentoodaemon, the steel DID melt.
youtube(dot)com/watch?v=_p_o7d8rDCQ (1:14)
so why does NIST say, "...in no instance did NIST report that steel in the WTC towers melted due to the fires..."?
Perhaps all your blacksmithing experience might be useful here...
chrstsldr 4 years ago
Gent: "Truth" isnt the goal here with this ignorant crowd: This is just a vehicle for them to try to impress each-other with "knowledge".
These kids are likely ineffective Low-Grade intelligence, with a dose of "Junk Science" to support their Lucy & Ethyl pipedreams.
Its not about the truth: Its about "winning" little childish arguments with "facts" (usually ANOTHER low-grade amateur video!
Skrewtinizer 4 years ago
They seek the valueless respect of these other morons up here. Each of them wants to be more "In the Know" than the last!
If I had no accomplishments in life, and I was 12, Id want to be seen as a "prophet" of these illumorons too.... NOT!
Skrewtinizer 4 years ago
Where's the truck?
realistate 4 years ago
Thou shall not kill or support killings; Who ever kills or supports killings will go straight to Hell, No questions asked. You are being tested here on earth, which is Lucifer's testing ground and he/she and his extensions will do everything to not let you go through his tests, and he/she is given all the powers to test your inner urges and actions. Please stop insisting to go to Hell like a brainwashed Zombie. Please wake up. Please investigate and insist for the truth; wtc7-the smoking gun.
jimbotheproducer001 4 years ago
You all can see that the below bridge has not been pancaked by the falling of the burned bridge above; That requires a logical consequence, suggesting that without any demolition bombs the bridge-below can not come down. Therefore the further logic suggests that the twin towers were taken down by demolition. Thou shall not kill and support killings, and please stop following the cliff jumpers. It's not worth to go to Hell for nothing.
jimbotheproducer001 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You will get kissed on the nearest possible Friday by the love of your life.Tomorrow will be the best day of your life.However,if you don't post this comment to at least 3 videos,you will die within 2 days.Now uv started reading dis dunt stop.This is so scary.Send this to 5 videos in 143 minutes.When ur done press F6 and ur crushes name will appear on the screen in big letters.This is scary cuz it actually works.If u break the chain you will have problems with relations for the next 5 years
AJproductions11 4 years ago
the tanker driver is pretty much phucked. he will never haul fuel again and will undoubtedly face legal issues for years to come.
thermonuclearwarfare 4 years ago
Explain building 7.
ZippyDaKid 4 years ago
"We Pulled It" -Larry Silverstein
than217 4 years ago
I think this was a Bush conspiracy. Fire NEVER melts steal. I swear I hear a bomb go off too, maybe if a missle go buy that hit the bridge. It couldn't be PHYSICS. (directed at WTC conspiracy morons)
devilbear 4 years ago
devilbear, do you know who says fire did NOT melt the World Trade Center steel?
NIST (the National Institute of Standards and Technology), the government agency that did the official investigation of the collapse of the WTC towers. "...In no instance did NIST report that steel in the WTC towers melted due to the fires..." wtc(dot)nist(dot)gov FAQs
Are you calling NIST conspiracy morons?
chrstsldr 4 years ago
No you are the conspiracy moron.
"This report describes how the aircraft impacts and subsequent fires led to the collapse of the towers after terrorists flew jet fuel laden commercial airliners into the buildings;" From the NIST site.
wtc nist gov
If you actually read the site it discribes in great detail how the fire weakened the steal.
And this is the site YOU refrenced.
devilbear 4 years ago
You sarcastically said "Fire NEVER melts steal", implying ..that this is what "conspiracy morons" say.
Well, NIST says the WTC steel did NOT melt.
But you know what?
There WAS molten steel at ground zero.
youtube(dot)com/watch?v=8X5F5PttzJY
So, why do you think NIST would deny that?
chrstsldr 4 years ago
You didn't read the NIST report. Please read it all.
Conspiracy Morons please google NIST and actually READ the report.
devilbear 4 years ago
Sadly, I HAVE.
If YOU have, you probably already know the results of the fire tests done of the steel floor assemblies.
And you probably also know that the NIST report does NOT explain the twin towers collapse, nor does it claim to.
It theorizes what probably caused the collapse to begin. It doesn't explain the collapse itself. It's an important distinction devilbear. You must have picked up on it.
Read again the quote you posted for me. It's very carefully worded.
chrstsldr 4 years ago
Well said ! Anyone with an IQ of forty (or less) knows that if a structure is weakened ... it will result in a pull-down... but the debris will follow an erratic and assymetrical course... causing the toppling over of some parts of that structure, pancaking, etc.
pierre766 4 years ago
The only thing I can think of, that's worse than a Conspiracy Moron... must be A WHITE TRASH AMERICAN PRIMATE IN DENIAL. Me Tarzan, you Conspiracy Moron...Ough Ough !
pierre766 4 years ago
You are so beyond us all peirre.
Love
Tarzan
devilbear 4 years ago
...you kill me !
pierre766 4 years ago
Do you worship Xenu?
devilbear 4 years ago
.. I'm gonna have a heart attack
pierre766 4 years ago
LOL
I guess you were not ready for that info.
devilbear 4 years ago
pierre766 please be patient with devilbear. being honest about the physics of the 9/11 event, leads to some very frightening realizations that many people cannot handle. ..so they hide their fear in ridicule.
..either that, or devilbear doesn't have a clue what "erratic and assymetrical course" means, and won't take the time to figure it out.
chrstsldr 4 years ago
looks like the bridge didn't support the troops
than217 4 years ago
Hey I thought reinforced steel could withstand like 4000 degrees? Was that truck that crashed carrying rocket fuel or something?
than217 4 years ago
lo que pasa es que era un "paisa" terrorista.... jajajajajajajajaja!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
mrcancino1975 4 years ago
I was there the day after it happened, it was sorta scary to see a bridge just on the ground dead
Coastergeekperson04 4 years ago
I love how people are still promoting their conspiracies here that's under a video of steel and concrete collapsing due to fire. without the assistance of a plane crashing into it no less. haha. any man can make a mistake. only a fool keeps making the same one.
keeyaaw 4 years ago
Can people really walk that close to an inferno i mean there like somebody standing right on the bridge, or was it just the angle of the camera?
gthreesix 4 years ago
omg i remember that, i live like 2 hours away from there
rustyspoons27 4 years ago
Sorry, I forgot to put the sarcasm tag on so that people knew I was joking.
s7rugg1e 4 years ago
even though it was early its still crazy no one got hurt. pretty sick that they got the lower half (the part that the collapsed fell on to) repaired (or at least up & running again) already.
to the geniuses: fire CAN melt steel. we melt steel down and pour it into molds for TONS of things. you think someones gonna get all medieval & whip out a hammer every time they want to shape steel?
ook it up. there may be varied numbers but thats because there are different grades and alloys of steel.
gpibambam 4 years ago
This was NOT the case in the wtc towers. You see, NIST recreated and fire tested the wtc steel floor assemblies; those assemblies did NOT fail the fire tests (even though the test fires burned hotter and longer than did the fires on 9/11/01); ...the steel assamblies warped but they did not collapse.
Oddly enough though, MOLTEN steel was found at ground zero. What do you suppose cause that? A blast furnace? youtube(dot)com/watch?v=8X5F5PttzJY
chrstsldr 4 years ago
Genius gpibambam, to MELT steel into a MOLTEN state (as you have described) you need either a blast furnace or explosives. Not just any kind of fire can melt steel
However, a carbon based fire can WEAKEN steel
chrstsldr 4 years ago
i like the term genius =D
too bad it doesnt apply.
obviously didnt know enough about wtf i was talking about. now i do. thanks =D
regardless of whether or not fire can melt steel (apparently it cant)-- does anyone actually think this was a terrorist thing? or a government ploy?
gpibambam 4 years ago
gpibambam you are a rare find in the you tube comments! curious, modest, and funny (the medieval hammer thing, very good) : )
You mean the bridge? It was probably an accident, ..but the timing of this "melting steel bridge" has raised a few eyebrows (Rosie recently proclaimed on The View that fire cannot melt steel.)
The WTC is another matter... the official story is a ridiculous lie.
If you have time for an internet movie (google), I highly recommend 'Improbable Collapse'
chrstsldr 4 years ago
woot rare find!
thanks.
yeah i meant the bridge... im sure its created a few new skeptics. didnt know about rosie but... that proves what she knows. regardless of the temperature & how- its gotta melt SOMEHOW. so. blah.
i wasnt even remotely talkin about the WTC stuffs. i actually tried to avoid that in my brief research because im sure tons of people have made stuffs up
gpibambam 4 years ago
aaand... thx for the recommendation. ill check it out.
gpibambam 4 years ago
cool, it (Improbable Collapse) was just screened at the Silver Lake Film Festival; it's really worth watching : )
chrstsldr 4 years ago
I melted my polyester pants once by lighting my farts
TUTUBO11 4 years ago
ROFL!
lindatran 4 years ago
if fire cannot mel steel,why the WTC soooo huge went down hard???...??
leandro7791 4 years ago
because it was more than fire in both occasions, just the governments latest ploy to cover up their robbing of the people.
laureltron 4 years ago
so thats what happened and what it looks like.... 0.0
BumbleMeHott 4 years ago
THIS is false flag operation to prove Rosie O'Donnell wrong. FIRE CANNOT MELT STEEL!
s7rugg1e 4 years ago
it looks like the apocalypse.
cz77 4 years ago
And let me tell you, I remember a lot of it like it was last week. The close ups from the helicopters, (which I also made reference to as it was strange the same didn't apply in the WTC attacks). Mostly they were VERY, VERY worried that it would collapse. Just fall right over into one of the other buildings.
prussiafox 4 years ago
...I see what you mean (found photos of burning FI bldg online.) four floors pretty much fully engulfed in fire for FOUR hours. Looking at the damage, you could easily imagine it might TIP over onto the adjacent bldgs, but ...there was NO structural damage. I'm with you ...it's wierd.
chrstsldr 4 years ago
I do find the towers thing strange though... nothing like what I've experienced. Earthquakes, the First Interstate Fire. I stated somewhere that they were VERY worried that it would collapse and the inspectors found out that 3 1/2 hours of fire didn't do a thing to the steel.
prussiafox 4 years ago
Strange also how so few people seem to find an 11 floor per second collapse so ...unremarkable.
Those righteous proclamations that Rosie is so very wrong about steel and fire are especially interesting because even the official explanation for the towers says, "...in no instance did NIST report that steel in the WTC towers melted due to the fires..."
chrstsldr 4 years ago
The towers thing is very strange indeed.
Another strange thing is how so many comments to this video are such desperate efforts to assert that this collapsed overpass explains those towers. YOUR example, the First Interstate building, is a much more relevant precedent than this single slab of reinforced concrete.
chrstsldr 4 years ago
Well there are a few similarities to be sure. FI was only a year younger, it had the same architecture, box with open floor and a center core (I think, but don't quote me on that). Looks a little bit similar. The location of the fire would have put the same if not more weight, so... I don't know. Just weird.
prussiafox 4 years ago
If you do not copy and paste this onto 10 videos your mom will die in 4 hours
phongtran5 4 years ago
The logical deduction is that the rebar steel was exposed horizontally, that whole bridge surface and it was exposed intention, not like the fires that were lapping up fire-proofed 5 inch thick plate columns in the World Trade Center - these little bars had no heat sink and after two hours with all that weight on them they fell
ChangeDaChannel 4 years ago