I tend to find Richard Strauss' musical ideas uninspired and uninteresting. That is a subjective reaction to his music, so I am aware that other people will take a different view. However, when you compare the cogency of Wagner's or Mahler's musical themes and ideas, Strauss' seem rather tame. Wagner's themes, once heard, stay with you forever. I cannot say the same about Strauss' rather unexciting themes- clever though he is.
It's funny, because I'm usually willing to fault Argerich for speed and rushing, usually in favour of Glenn Gould's style, but in this case I just find this plain uninspired. The entire performance just feels disjointed, almost. Sometimes I think the music suffers as a result of Gould's die-hard stoicism and obedience to the score.
the cadenza sounds like bach,but i think glenn´s approach to this music was not in a virtuoso manner,very interesting, i like this version more than m.argerich´s indeed!:)
I thought Glenn Gould's boring, pedantic, humourless performance of Strauss' Burleske was never going to end!!. He would have had a thing or two to learn from Martha Argerich's extraordinarily lively,imaginative, energetic, passionate performance. She does justice to the title Burleske and it's a pleasure to watch her enjoy herself playing this piece. She's second to none!.
eligualao is quite correct in his/her assessment. What a pity that the honest comment was given thumbs down. Gould here does NOT live up to Argerich by any stretch of the imagination. Liste3n to the Abbado/Argerich. It's ASTOUNDING!
I like this. I guess the Argerich version on youtube is the more standard, but this version (music and video) brings out the fantasy and dare I say partly "camp" nature of the piece
Title suggestion: Using exhilarating music to bore people to death
th3wing3dpaint3r 6 months ago
I tend to find Richard Strauss' musical ideas uninspired and uninteresting. That is a subjective reaction to his music, so I am aware that other people will take a different view. However, when you compare the cogency of Wagner's or Mahler's musical themes and ideas, Strauss' seem rather tame. Wagner's themes, once heard, stay with you forever. I cannot say the same about Strauss' rather unexciting themes- clever though he is.
bayreuth79 6 months ago
It's funny, because I'm usually willing to fault Argerich for speed and rushing, usually in favour of Glenn Gould's style, but in this case I just find this plain uninspired. The entire performance just feels disjointed, almost. Sometimes I think the music suffers as a result of Gould's die-hard stoicism and obedience to the score.
mmoynan 11 months ago
This entire performance would have been far better with a conductor who didn't just keep time and have his nose stuck in the score.
Talk about a lifeless, uninspired accompaniment. Blah.......
Gould is thoughtful and full of insight--as usual.
ipmoic 1 year ago
Oh Please! If you can't hear Argerich's superiority in this then you're deaf.
JoFrSc 2 years ago
To be honest i like it. ALOT.
wnxg4nd4lf 2 years ago
me too
musicpiano14 2 years ago
I enjoyed this Gould video very much, thanks.
I highly recommend the Janis/Reiner recording of this work - it still puts goose-bumps on me when I listen to it.
palcsi 2 years ago
the cadenza sounds like bach,but i think glenn´s approach to this music was not in a virtuoso manner,very interesting, i like this version more than m.argerich´s indeed!:)
kajohada 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
I thought Glenn Gould's boring, pedantic, humourless performance of Strauss' Burleske was never going to end!!. He would have had a thing or two to learn from Martha Argerich's extraordinarily lively,imaginative, energetic, passionate performance. She does justice to the title Burleske and it's a pleasure to watch her enjoy herself playing this piece. She's second to none!.
eligualao 3 years ago
eligualao is quite correct in his/her assessment. What a pity that the honest comment was given thumbs down. Gould here does NOT live up to Argerich by any stretch of the imagination. Liste3n to the Abbado/Argerich. It's ASTOUNDING!
JoFrSc 2 years ago
but gould does play the prokofiev sonata 7 third mvmnt better than argerich. look for his recording of it on youtube.
MichaelDLC 2 years ago
Genious! Tremendous talent!
hiddensensitivities 3 years ago
Thank you so much for posting this. GG has been a real inspiration in my life and this performance really moves me.
21183Bruce 3 years ago
Sensational! Bravo! TY.
paulostroff99 3 years ago
I like this. I guess the Argerich version on youtube is the more standard, but this version (music and video) brings out the fantasy and dare I say partly "camp" nature of the piece
mikezzzaaa3 3 years ago
No comments?
MichaelDLC 3 years ago
There would be more, but it seems that the moment someone disagrees with the performance, everyone is at the ready to flame them...
I completely agree with eligualao; slow, humourless and boring.
fronternijenzonka 3 years ago 2
@MichaelDLC
Just speechless. Totally swooned, that is all.
graphicgratitude 11 months ago