Also something to note is that the IQ of a certain Race averages. For negros it means if you let like 110IQ negros into your nation, their children will be like IQ80 or so - and there goes down your nation!
And the truth is that you belong to the bottom end of the distribution curve if you actually believe the intellectually most black people are benath you. That is hilarious outlandish foolishness considering that African immigrants outscore every other ethnic group for degree attainment in the west according to US Census Bureau data available for download now in PDF from government website. You racist clown.
@Raybanmonster "And the truth is that you belong to the bottom end of the distribution curve if you actually believe the intellectually most black people are benath[sic] you."
Patent nonsense. I have an IQ of 131, measured professionally. Do all of the professors who think niggers are dumb lie at the bottom of the distribution? Does Rushton? Does James Watson? So all one has to do is say "I think the race IQ gap is genetic" and suddenly they have the lowest IQ? You are making up shit.
the intellectual deficit between other races is most clear when putting a group of white scientists in a room with those of say indian, pakistani, and african descent. say an international conference, the disparities become clear just observing the understanding, ability and comms skills of whites compared to indians and stark compared to blacks, even if u put a group of all american scientists in a room, its clear, whites will naturally come up on top. & im not white people ok. its hard reality
Phwahahahahaaaaaaa what nonsens, clearly you have never witnessed a room full of Graduates or academics. Let me assure you such differences are not clear at all when they are grouped in the same room. To imply such a stupid thing absolutely tells us how much of a Nigger you really are. My corned beef skinned filthy white Nigger... you are so ignorant I can tell you need to hit the books,
@Raybanmonster what this lecturer is saying is true. and at least i can read, how long did it take u to comprehend my comment nig nog? spent years with academics and graduates and u r completely wrong, thats exactly where the differences shine out! the blacks r always struggling or at the most simply on point, nothing exceptional and no innovative, creative thinking there, same with the indians/paks, very little genuine insight and rarely lateral or original thinking that really is the whitemans
Phwahahahaaaaaaa So what you mean to say is that YOU are BETTER than ME. Phwahahahahahaaaa.
Wake up stupid dick... what colour is your president?
Why are black people actually black? Could it be that they are from a continent where the temperature reaches 40degrees and access to water / drought is common? lolol
Do you think every country in the world profited from slavery?
LEARN TO THINK. and by the way what exactly HAVE YOU done with all yr white advantage? oh I know NOTHING much!
My corned beef skinned NIGGER, you carry on believing what you want to believe, but notice that you are not the US president, you didnt go to Havard and despite all that white advantage you have studied nothing , invented nothing and shown no abilities whatsoever. You manual labour dick headed Nigger
@Raybanmonster ok this is getting silly, but for some fun i wil stoop down to your mindless level, you probably havent even noticed that u didnt put forward any intellectual argument but as befitting your racial degeneracy u simply resorted to non sensical insults. so here u go, somehting u can undrstand, yur a nigger, nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger! i dont even like this word or racial insults, i prefer the science, but u r a stupid fuck so...working class monkey. u dont knw shit nigga!
Articles written by ignorant Psuedo-scientists claiming intellectual prowess but are really just lost misguided twits who are scrambling to find credibility in the scientific community. In fact Jaraed Taylor is pilloried like Rushton for thier utter banal racism.. and you a jackass thinks these are "great articles"? Phwahahahahahaaaa MY NIGGER.
Degree U.S. Population African Asian Europe, Russia & Canada
College Degree 23.10% 43.80% 42.50% 28.90%
Advanced Degree2 .60% 8.20% 6.80% 5.80%
SOURCE: 2000 US CENSUS Estimates indicate that a significant percentage of black students at elite universities are African or the children of African immigrants, a notable example of this is Barack Obama.
OH DEAR... HOW DO YOU DEAL WITH THIS GOVERNMENT CERTIFIED DATA ABOUT BLACK PEOPLE?
I'm white (and a bit asian)..but I wonder if the world would be a much better place if asians ruled the world. I think in a way it would, because they do seem smart, long term thinkers.
However, plainly looking at the results I would wonder if it would really workout. Only japan and recently korea have shown to become wealthy. I find it intruiging why there has been "white supremacy" while tests suggest asians would have the benefit of being smarter on average (well in the tests)
Let's take dogs as an example. All dogs are 1 race (meaning they can mate and have children). However, it is pretty much known that some dogs are better at some things than others. The others are better at something else. Because this is not about humans, there is not so much taboo on this as on human races. They always pick the same dogs for the same kind of tasks/"jobs"for a reason. I have yet to see a poodle or a pitbull becoming a police dog...(I'm sure its possible but it will be harder)
The talent of Tiger woods may or may not be the exception to the rule. I think concluding things out of single, or limited amount of cases can be a tricky field, mostly for the fact that one can find enough exceptions to any rule that in that way of reasoning take down the general pattern in anything. Let's say most people on earth have black hair (which is true) can in my opinion not be brought down by showing 100 people with blonde hair. Total amounts should be compared to come to averages
I think quotes like "those stupid chinese" do not really mean too much in my opnion, mostly in the sense that if someone is working in another country, and does not speak the language well or at all, and is doing a simple job, it can easily *seem* this person is dumb, while there have been many cases where a man was a doctor in his own country, but after moving to another country (for savety) they had no other choice than simple jobs because of the language barriere or chances
What I've always founded interesting is the relation between interest and 'ability/skill' between people. People seem to a certain extend to be better at the things they're good at, although this is also often not the case(just look at 'idols').
I partly agree. I think generally alot of people are just interested in subjects. my sister for example majored in medical biology, not becuse she was interested in a good job, money or anything, but just because she was always facinated by the subject. My parents never even asked us to do schoolwork as long as we were happy. We were given total freedom (parents were ex-hippies, so you can imagine what kinda freedom). I think "interest" is somewhat genetic..like fetishes, sexual preference..etc
I think in the first place not anyone is *better* than one another, being it race , gender, sexual preference..I'm all fine with it.
However, I do think that if you for example compare it with the gender thing, it may be more politically correct to say women are just good at math as men, but averages and the brain development behind it has always shown it is 'logical' men are better at math, and women better at for example communication.It does not mean anyone is'better',but they're different
Just from observation I've often had the impression there could be differenes in either long term or short term investments and rewards among the different races. it always seems (to me) that that for example asians are *very*"submissive"/long time thinkers, pretty much planning their life out,without taking any risk at all anywhere (avoiding risks).On the other hand, blacks seem to be more willing to take bigger 'risks' for a possibility of a bigger reward (crime can be good income if done well
Reading alot of comments here makes me wonder why all these *intelligent* exceptions to the rule (and I do not mean*intelligent* sarcasticly)take themself as an example of the rule,and conclude a theory about *averages*can not be true.One would say it does not take*that* much intelligence to realise that an *average* is an average. That's all..
I were a dumb eastern asian person , and I would come here saying"see I'm DUMB"so south-east asians CAN'T be smart. Would you take him seriously?
but youll still take a heart from a dead black man or his blood to support your ailing life. What a fucking prick you are, your just jealous. get on with your life, a black man isnt the reason for your problems asshole, you caused all those problems yourself.
Greetings, sir--I'm Black, in a Ph.D program, and scored 1380 on my GRE's with a 5.5 in the writing section...I'm CERTAINLY not "under evolved," as you claimed lol.
@dhills2009 wrote: "I'm CERTAINLY not "under evolved," as you claimed..."
I would agree that it's wrong for the person who you quote to have written what he did. Not only is it an intemperate thing to write, it's scientifically meaningless and unmeasurable.
Having said that, I must add that everything that Levin spoke about here seems reasonable. It's just that when discussing topics like this one must speak with as much precision as possible.
@dhills2009 You are proof that there are exceptions to every rule. Just as there are blacks (and whites) at either end of the spectrum (with most being in the middle). The thing is, intelligent whites are the RULE, not the exception, whereas intelligent blacks are the EXCEPTION, not the rule.
No...I will never believe that. Granted, I test well (always have), but a lot of what we call "intelligence" is environmental. I guarantee, if situations were reversed, and whites were enslaved and blacks were the majority, the IQ testing would be totally reversed...guaranteed. Intelligence is NOT genetic, because if that were the case, neither my mom or dad would have a masters degree; they grew up modestly and without a lot of means---EXCEPT for a disciplined ENVIRONMENT.
FY, I'm from the south, and having done my masters in the north and now my Ph.D back in the south, I say boldly, there's moronic whites in both regions. I've competed against races everywhere, and outperformed them everytime...so I buy into "exceptions." There is only environment and access...that's all that is needed for intelligence. Unfortunately, blacks have had to endure the worst...hampering creativity and IQ along the way.
Lastly, (as I work on german translations lol)--I'd argue that your, and people like Levin's insistence on the 'lesser nature' of black IQ, is really an insidious attempt to try make us believe those 'stats' about ourselves in an effort to promote the decline of black self-esteem. If that's your motivation, allow me to respond in the following: you'll be waiting long time... The day of black minstrelsy is over...now you have blacks like me reconstructing the race...
@dhills2009 Frankly, I don't care why you think Dr Levin or I think as we do. I have studied this issue and it is the TRUTH. I'm half Southern Italian, and I recognize that the facts also show that Southern Italians in general have lower IQs than Northern Italians. You should accept the TRUTH regardless.
Hogwash--The moment one accepts the "truths" of the dominant class for oneself, one essentially assigns to themselves an inferior label--I refuse to do that. I also find it comical/curious that your argumentation began talking about the lower IQs of of Southern Italians, but you somehow are an exception due to your Jewish ancestry; are you just lucky? I, too, have Jewish heritage, does my academic success and high IQ owe itself to my Jewish heritage as well? lol
Bottom line, all this foolishness about race and IQ is another in a long line of attempts to institutionalize white supremacy. That is, if you can validate black de-humanity (i.e. inferiority), it becomes all the more easy to deem us no-things--non-entities. Clearly, with me and my family (all of whom are educationed and solidly middle class), as well as thousands of other black families, your attempts fail. WE (educated minorities) are growing.
@Chana1313 Stop it!!! do you think you will always be able to avoid me? well here I am and I will comment on this stupid remark: you find it easy to accept the lower average IQ of Southern Italians to Northerners because you are still Italian! your whitness provides you with enough reason for an inflated opinion of yourself. Would you be willing to accept the fact that 15 % of blacks have higher IQs than whites and therefore I could have a higher IQ than you?
oh really? its truth is it? lololol. So you believe that all countries start out with the same level of resources and access to them and the same weather. You also believe that drought of Malaria or heat have no effect whatsoever on the prospects of a country do you? you think intelligence drives these things??? Phwahahahahahaaa
You are an uneducated racist dofus... this makes you actually a corned beef skinned white jackass Nigger... oh yes it does... MY NIGGER
@Chana1313 Warriors of truth at the end always wins. I am Pole and far from denying that northern Europeans are in general more intelligent then the other side.
So what you are trying to imply is that YOU SOMEHOW DRAG SOCIETY UPWARDS by your presence huh? Well then let me ask u two questions.
What is it about YOU that lifts a society because gfrom where Im standing, you are not talented intellectually and Im guessing you have not invented, patented anything or made it to the white House right? Are you a hotshot lawyer? Doctor? lol. Are you better than the 5000 BLACK Doctors a year the US imports to meet the numbers? ?
There are NOT very few black scientists actually that is a misnomer. that is a US issue. African born blacks are the most educated ethnic group in the USA. Funny how that information made available by the government USA via thier regular PDFs for free download, at the US census bureau has ONCE AGAIN been ignored, as such we have hot gasses from aman who should have done his homework. AmREN is a joke, look at the people involved, No Harvard, No Oxfored Cambridge no MIT NOTHING GREAT. GO FIGURE
Africans are inferior that is very observable in Africa
Funny that, because when I look back at Colonialism, almost every European country failed to conquer Africa in the manner originally intended, why? because they couldnt take the heat or the malaria or the intensity of the sun. Thats why they abandoned so many mines, so much trade, IN LAND. So I dont think Africans are inferior at all. Even you are not superior in intellectual ability as a white man to me. Thats a guarantee
Is that why we had the colony of Australia for so long? The one that is still alligned to the crown. Because we can't take the "intensity of the sun"?
The fact is, many of our colonies cost more in expenditure than they gave us in profit. Especially Africa, there was nothing to gain except natural resources, which we already controlled.
In your ill considered laughable pontification you didnt talk about the Zulus or the many factious fights that led to the pull outs. To say britain took everything it got before they left is ignorant of the political ramifications of that behaviour which are still to be fully redeemed. Man you have no idea about things in any reasonable context at all. What about you? stop hiding behind other people youve never met. What is magnificent about your white self Vs me? oh I know, NOTHING. lololol
I have a question 4 any white person. this question is not an attempt to b clever, it is an attempt to get to the core of the issue. the question is thus: LETS ASSUME BLACKS HAVE INFERIOR COGNITIVE ABILITIES TO WHITES. IF EXPOSING IT IS NOT BECAUSE OF A NEED TO FEEL SUPERIOR, WHAT WOULD THE REASON BE? THIS IS IN LARGE CAPS BECAUSE I DO WANT THE OPINION OF YOUTUBERS.
A need to feel superior? We are superior, this has been pointed out, we don't have a need to feel anything as we are confident in our own abilities, however it really doesn't upset me to say that Chinese do better on IQ tests, partly because they are really uncreative bastards, partly because im glad im at least not african.
Im glad to be of African decent. Black African immigrants ARE THE MOST educated by degree of ALL ethnic groups in the USA. Not even the Asians beat them collectively. Isnt that a contrast of FACT compared to the hyperbolee we hear about this supposed "low black IQ", which is just about school kids in inner city scoring low and then taken by idiots to be representative of all black people.
Its Ironic, the ethnic group in the US mixed mostly with white (black US x-slaves) have lowest IQ score
I'd love to see these statistics you keep espousing, besides you can make statistics fit any picture you want, if you warp them enough. Africans are inferior that is very observable in Africa, we don't need statistics to prove that.
Raybanmonster stole my thunder but i do have to agree! since caribean and other non-american blacks on average score higher than black americans it appears that mixing with whites has in fact lowered our IQ! and its not the chinese that score higher; its all asians. even those whos second language is english. as far as the Chinese being uncreative, how can that be when everything in your house is made by them? they r also super smart since they control ur economy. damn u guys r stupid.
The Chinese didn't invent the things they are making, they copied it from westerners .They only have low tech manufacturing and agriculture with a realtively small service sector - the service sector is where the highest profit margins are. China also has some of the highest levels of debt. If you look at GDP per capita, China is doing terribly. Japan has a larger and vastly more high-tech economy than China.
OKAY HERE WE GO! if the chinese have a small service sector and they still manage to sell ur ideas back to u i would say the joke is on u! 2, whatever their dept your money from purchasing their products will help lower it. 3, the japanese do have a larger and vastly superior high-tech economy than china and they too r laughing at u all the way to the bank! amazingly, ur reluctance to give any credit to the chinese wont result in tacking the "made in china" stamp of everything u own! NICE TRY.
I would say the fact that one would make a purchase in the first place from the Chinese shows that the Chinese can make me profitable. thats basic economics, both win so your point is blunt.
Do you think Japan and China share different intellectual capabilities or total capacity then? (which is different from an IQ test score). Do you think the reason North and South Korea are different is because of Intellect? Really? think again and extrapolate globally
THIS IS MY POINT: the psycological profession has determined that IQ does not measure intelligence and what it does measure is logical-mathematical ability. that would expalin why doctors and engineers tendd to score higher. because that ability is developed amongst groups that place a value on technical problem solving and advancement they will score higher on those tests hence the asians score on average, the highest. since math related subjects r mastered by memorizing the relationship.
Do "memorizing relationships" not more or less define intelligence? I could argue the' memorizing' part, but the 'relationship' between things is what makes us intelligent creatures. We can see a stone and know how soft the stone is in comparison to something else and conclude things from it..
Remembering the dictionary will not make anyone smart (on a usefull way)..yet see the relationships between things is where IMHO "intelligence" lies.Relations form theories form inventions
@PowerRedBull If you could argue the "memorizing" part, you would sir!! I don't doubt in any way that if you could further prove me wrong you would. You cannot escape the fact that if I ask you what 10 * 10 is you will answer quickly but not before a process of recollection takes place. as for blacks, since we live in the only nation buit on the idea that we are not human, just having SOME DOCTORS, LAWYERS AND ENGINEERS says that if not intelligent, we are super resourceful. I will take either.
Hi genious4real.What I was saying is that there are several ways to look at 'intelligence' and that in my idea intelligence that is usefull, is mostly the relationship between things, and not "facts" as some people sometimes think. One can learn anyone 1000 facts,but in my opinion (see opnion) I would say that I would say the persons are intelligent who are able to *use* that knowledge and build further on it.
@PowerRedBull I agree with you. In fact sir your definition is the one most accepted by unbiased experts in the fields that usually define it. Linda Gottfredson says, .....rather it reflects a broader and deeper capability for comprehending our surroundings -"catching on", "making sense", of things, or "figuring out" what to do. So you see, you are in great company.
@PowerRedBull No Sir!!! I am serious. Not only do I agree with you (no big deal since I am black and as a result would have a preference for your definition), but yes, after the study of so-called "over achievers" "experts" have redefined intelligence in a way that fits your model. A great book Sir: INTELLIGENCE AND HOW TO GET IT (WHY SCHOOLS AND CULTURES COUNT) Richard E Nisbett.
it's not too known that some people with autism seem very bright with some things, and are able to store up to 10.000 simple facts. What makes them remember every detail is actually 'missing' the *filter* that most people do have.If wehave 10 days of your life which are the same, our brains filters out unimportant things, and saves "important" things and how they are related to other things. That is pretty much how the human brain has "evolved", while not growing 100 times bigger
This is why people with (certain types of) autism often get very confused if 1 detail in a situation is different (for example the lamp has moved a bit in the room) , because *for them* the whole situation seems new. There is a difference, so it's new information without being compared to older information
Other people can 'relate' that the room is problably the same (rough comparison with older memory) and only 1 item has changed, which is no big deal
@PowerRedBull YES! what you said about "our brains filter out unimportant things". That is why many experts and just bright people like myself say so many blacks do not do well on ceratin tests. It simply is not important to them. The same reason is given for the difference in IQ between whites from agricultural America to the America of the present. I personally found out how many ounces were in a kilo from a local drug dealer!! He hated math, but it was "important" to know THAT.
@PowerRedBull Well Sir, Motivation and the forces behind it are not given the study they deserve. I majored in Philosophy and minored in Psych. That said, most people don't know or don't reveal that you could read the masterpieces of SIGMUND F, ABE MASLOW, KAREN HORNEY, A ADLER, JUNG, ALBERT ELLIS, CARL ROGERS, JEAN PIAGET and other White greats of the Psychological profession and you would be hardpressed to find ONE reference to race!!! The great ones knew PEOPLE ARE PEOPLE! If a person..
@PowerRedBull 2) if a person does not believe an education will result in a decent quality of life they will not likely excel in much that relates to it. Let me use myself as an example: My mother read like a fanatic. Everything from comparative religion to das Kapital. I grew to love philosophy (my favorite being Martin Hiedegger although his being a nazi causes me big problems). I majored in it and never understood why people (whites,asians,blacks) had such a hard time in class because I did
A third possibllity is that someone for some reason 'genetically' is better at something (let's say from very early childhood - ruling out nurture) and may *not* be too interested in that subject, yet *does* have good abilities in a certain area (be it math, psychology, whatever etc)
Personally I know ther are subjects I suck at , yet would like to be better at, and there are things I love and I'm good at , and there are things I'm good at, yet have little interst in
Those things are a bit "chicken & egg - what was first* logic. pretty intersting. I think to what humans call "succeed in life " , meaning more money , better job etc.. can be caused by either 3 of those "possibilies" in an individual
(taken in consideration this interest of that person has in some degree an overlap with a possible job - I mean, you can be good at pissing in the air, but it's quite useless for jobs lol)
(personallity i think happyness is #1 for a good life)
i must say I quite share your view on math VS philosphopy. Math is pretty "limited" in it's resources. I mean that when one does a calculation, I think there is much more a limited on things you can "bring in", while with philosphy, one can pretty much bring in every detail about life or a subject into the solution. It's a much broader field, yet less stricly defined, which makes it more interesting. It also requires a bit more 'guessing' which is in a way interesting too
Philosphy is more a bit like an open ending in a book or movie. It is not fully 'completed', which makes you think about it much longer, in comparison to a happy end. If the end is happy, there is not much more left to think about. In a way it's a calculation that has been solved totally.
Unsolved things are often more interesting (at least in my opinion) because there is always room for improvement and coming closer to the real truth, which problably still will not be reached
@PowerRedBull two very good books are: TALENT IS OVERRATED AND THE GENIUS IN ALL OF US. In TIOR a very good example of the myth of talent and "genetically" better is given in the example of tiger woods: The author points out that whilst many say tiger was "naturally' gifted, he started playing golf at 4 years of age and by the time most people had heard of him he was in fact 17 and had been having one on one lessons in an intense manner for 13 years! it talks about deliberate practice.
Well yes I agree that 'determination'plays a big role *too*, but as I'm sure you have experienced in your life there are things when you start out later or at the same time as someone else, but pick things up easier than this person, while while this person is just as passionate or even more passionate about the subject than you, but in the end manages to produce lower results/achievements/skill (this goes for about any kind of subject)
I think the people who are often considered "best" in their field both had to some agree *talent* which was *extra boosted* with experience. Everyone has a bit of a different way of reasoning and thinking. Some ways match certain fields better than others. If you find it very easy to do math on highschool (without more time enjoyment or more investment than others) then I would call a person talented in that field.
@PowerRedBull 2) it talks about deliberate practice and how it leads to being above average in the chosen field. It is also worth noting that asians who score high on intelligence tests and seemingly in most that they do have for the most part said that it was a matter of priorities, determination and focus and not at all innate ability! more than a few quotes can be found about "those stupid chinese" who worked on America's railroads!
Let's say someone is very intuituif and can guess easily how others feel, because this person notices body language and facial expression more than others (women have this ability more than men)..then I am pretty sure that with equal amount of training, they will still have an advantage over the man (again: averages). Of course it's possible the man could *compensate* this by trying harder, investing more time..but at the top where everyone does their best, the women will be best
@PowerRedBull If we take golf for example, in what manner could someone credit their "good genes" for playing it well? Tiger is thin compared to others on the tour so it is said that it is his TECHNIQUE that results in his long drives. Other than that perhaps he could have gotten his personality that allows him to focus better, but little else can be said to come by way of genes. getting back to the role of focusing, some experts say that those with genius IQs are best and mostly found as ...
To come back to tiger woods, I think he both had *good genes* for this particular field, and *both* invested alot of time in his achievement , giving him a strong advantage over both people who just possesed either one of them. There are alot of people with talents,that do not use them, which is pretty much a loss (IMHO)
I believe that In many (populair) fields both talent and determination are required for the top because of the rampant competition in those fields.
@PowerRedBull in support staff since they are limited in most things not of their specialty. This is most obvious in IT. as for talent being needed to reach the highest levels, again we have to understand that people bull shit their way to the top in many areas. The difference may be where one has to be physically sound, but in business for example the talents concerning manipulation, the courage to take chances and other such "people skills" play a large part. I will say this since there is .
I totally agree on people bullshitting their way to the top. I think CEO's are often not the smartest people, but people with a decent intelligence and willingly to take risks, and have a bit of dominant personality traits , in order to 'order' the other people around. I think this is why whites are generally wealthier than south east asians. S.E asians could be more intelligent in some ways, but I think their nature is not 'dominant' enough to 'rule/invent/take risks etc
@PowerRedBull since there is something to be said for getting to the point, it is now known that black IQ is growing at a faster pace than white IQ (although whites still score higher on the average) and that growth can be straced directly back and to the jim crow era and followed up to now. In other words black IQ grows in accordance to the freedom to pursue knowledge (this according to James R Flynn in WHAT IS INTELLIGENCE). He goes on to point out that the average black has the IQ of ..
I'm for familair with "jim crow era"...what is it? (my first language is not english , and neither I'm from the usa - although I do not say this era is something american)
@PowerRedBull Thank you for asking. First let me give you an opening to it: The first black slave came to america in roughly 1619. slavery was "abolished" in 1887 (AFTER ENGLAND AND FRANCE!). A called reconstruction followed that was supposed to let blacks take an active part in American life. During that time blacks started businesses and even ran and won in the senate and congress. racist whites could not stomach the black progress and the period of reconstruction ended and blacks...
@PowerRedBull were returned to thier second class status. Businesses were burned down and positions of power were voted away in favor of racist whites. The laws known as "jim crow" were put in place to return blacks to a position of servitude. Lynchings took place daily, burnings of blacks alive took place where body parts were cut off and given to white mayors and governers to keep and admire. All of this took place in the 20th century. America was only joined by NAZI GERMANY, STALIN'S RUSSIA
@PowerRedBull AND MAO'S CHINA. As for white supremecy, if you see how it was accomplished you will see a great deal of threat and warfare. If one has a gun they can have the IQ of a termite, the power is with the barrel. A buddy of mine who has a marketing firm says the idea that America is a stern by "good" country is the best marketing ploy in the history of selling goods, services or images. Asians could rule well, Buddhist asians that is.
@PowerRedBull as a white who lived in America in 1955. Whilst that is not something I am on the face proud of, it does show somethings one of which is that the rise in black IQ comes in relation to the freedom to develop those things it measures. I also will say that much of my feelings towards the pointing out of black IQ would lesson if whites would consider the implications of asian IQs being higher then theirs. Sure they admit it is the case, but they are not willing to go as far as ..
@PowerRedBull as far as saying asians should rule the world. whites unfortunately defend their"right of place" by pointing to a test that was devised to assure ALL french children of getting a proper education. I personnaly think the comparison to groups who have been only allowed to go to proper schools for a little over 40 years shows a character not worthing of imitating.
I think it may go a little too far to say that whites think the most intelligent race or themself 'should be ruling the world'.I think there are very few people who actually think this should be the case.After all,there are only relatively few people in a country who actually 'rule'the country.Most people are just residents in the end.In any group of people you can find enough intelligent people to rule the country.However, it remains the question if those are selected (look at bush)
@PowerRedBull HAHAHA! I like that thing about Bush. Yes, you are right. As a young black boy I was told how speaking well was so important. Than the nation elects Bush! A man that butchers the language!
@PowerRedBull 3) because I did not. To this day my white commie buddies say I am just "freekin far out" and "deep" and although it feels good to get such praise and hear such words, I know that I am just a product of my interest which happens to be Philosophy. I hate math (my professors say it's because I could not argue the answer) and I admire those who are good at it, but I understand it too is their interest! einstein was driven to prove newton wrong. He smelled terrible though!!
ILL GO WITH ONLY THE EAST-ASIANS! my point was that ur idea that evolution maxed out with u is not true! as for u including urself into "European" pot, if u are american u should know that Europeans (even white ones) don't care 4 your kind much. If u r a European, u should know that ur stupidity is being faded out and rare across the seas. also, u told me to respond quickly as though i would not. as a black man who loves putting people like u in their place, i live for such things.
i will always speak up! im a big show off and i find ur logic very easy to poke wholes in. i will however ask u to show how worthy u r of my time by proving u know what IQ actually is. i ask that because my unknown freind raybanmonster have to work from the premise that u people know what it is and i dont think u do. your kind never know what ur talking about, thats all part of being white in america. George W proved that. okay? what is IQ. Answer that then I will take u apart.
IQ is intelligence Quotient. It is a cognitive test aimed at measuring speed and depth of mental processing. the IQ test does capture some part of intelligence but not all intelligence at all eg it wont capture great sportsmen or artist. The test comes in so many forms that many have discredited its use for comparison purposes as the test is not standardised linguistically, although many think it is actually it hasnt. Now explain to me the diff between Phenotype and Genotype.
PART 2: between symbols it is an ability that can be developed in anyone who has not suffered from or is born with a brain injury. as 4 phenotype, it in small terms thus: characteristics of org that results from genes and envirnment. genotype is usually used to describe the genetic makeup of an org. most of us r fairly smart! THE POINT IS WHAT IS INTELLIGENCE? DO IQ TESTS MEASURE IT? DOES ONE RACE HAVE A MONOPOLY ON IT? IS IT INFLUENCED BY EXTERNAL FORCES IE, EXP, EDU, ENV. THOSE R THE POINTS.
wELL THE FACT THAT ANYONE CAN LEARN THIS ABILITY (TO VARYING DEGREES OF SPEED) SUPPORTS MY ARGUMENT COMPLETELY.
gOOD, sO YOU UNDERSTAND THEN THAT WAY A PERSON LOOKS DOES NOT TELL US ABOUT THIER TOTAL GENETIC COMPLIMENT. UNLESS YOU ARE TRYING TO TELL US YOU THINK iq IS LINKED TO EYES COLOUR OR HAIR TYPE? LOL..
yOU ALSO SAID MOST OF US ARE FAIRLY SMART. CORRECT HUMANS ARE A SMART BUNCH REGARDLESS OF ETHNICITY, YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT GENES ANYONE HAS BECAUSE WERE ALL UNIQUE.
It is astonishing the amount of bigotry and poorly educated white people who think they understand science and can interpret the scientific findings of papers. Just because a substance looks like water it doesnt mean it will taste like water. Just because you see many blacks who are poor, doesnt mean its because they cant help themselves. No white country has successfully conquered an African country because of the Heat and the Malaria affecting 1 in 4 people in workforce. WAKE UP!
There is no selectivity that has taken place on the basis of intellect in the recent history of man. Just because some poor blacks are scoring low on an IQ test doesnt mean all black people have low IQ. Low IQ is congruent with family income. Black immigrant Africans are the MOST educated ethnic group in US. No gene has been found linked to intelligence directly. There is NO correlation between brain size & IQ, else short people / women would be inferior to tall / men & clearly this is no.
Im a black Scientist from UK, there are many of us especialy in tech subjects. The reason is cultural and who are you to discuss this issue. What a disgrace.
Why is it that BLACK AFRICAN IMMIGRANTs are obtaining more degrees compared to the US population as a whole? This number would confer many blacks with a very hi IQ, and even if you adjust for only hi IQ blacks, there are too many obtaining degrees. Many blacks feel uncomfortable in which dominated environs becos of exclusion and racism
But even the fact that the proportion of blacks attaining higher education is proportionately high, that figure still discredits any notion that a black IQ is somehow less. This is pure racist nonsense, swith off the light or use a phone and in many instances you cant tell what ethnicity someone is. Biology has no race, it just sees different people with differing levels of inherited protection against the SUN. It is daft to think there is intellectual benefit associated to such protection.
Protection against the sun (skin color) is one of the features set by common ancestry, or race. Other features can include bone structure, and characteristics of the eyes, liver, kidneys, stomach, blood, brain, or immune system.
Just because it's offensive doesn't automatically mean that it's incorrect.
But since when was intelligence a multifaceted entity included here? Since when was intellect such a selectivity issue that somehow blacks lost out? There is no selectivity that has taken place on the basis of intellect.
with politically correct liberal lies running amok and negros overly protected on all fronts, its nice to hear the truth, that PEARLS BEFORE SWINE is the call and trend of the day, MATT. 7:6
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IS EVIL RACISM AGAINST WHITES AND ASIANS.
and the true scientific picture of affirmative action is that point per point blacks get into college the easiest and asians the hardest... whites are the second most victimized by this per point on the SAT and hispanics also benefit wrongly but not as much as blacks... so that has been the break down of truth... i've seen the data - is the data ignorant, myself or just you?
If so youd note first that affirmative action does NOT actually pass a degree or do your coursework for you in any degree. Also I notice that good universities do not hand out degrees on the bais of race or skin colour. Whites are NOT victimized, they have it easiest., they have more inheritance per capita & dont have to deal with racial negativity daily, ironic how your thinking got you here isnt it?
no, point per point blacks gain entrance to college more than whites with the same score, this is STEALING, the racism has reversed and harms a greater group, as opposed to racism against blacks which is less of a loss of potential... blacks create their racial negativity, not simply by being black... ironic and more to the point counter productive long term to REenslave blacks from africa in the new world, should have got the irish, etc...
"Stealing"? from who exactly, you as a bordeline student? is that the standard you are discussing? Can you not see that black people descended from slaves in US have come from something that is wrong? Are you not aware that they faced much hardship and unfairness? The biggest damaging issue was lack of education which contrasts heavily with black African immigrants as the most Educated ethnic group of All including indigenous groups!
and what should we do then? ignore the ravages and exploitation of a continent by white slavemasters who fuelled much of thier industrialization through slave labour and low cost goods from a deliberately divided Africa? and let the people who were denied access to their past and history again denied access to education? when we know that the police and many white people are still showing negative bias toward black intellectual talent? Sure..whatever
what % of profit should a savage receive in the following case: a white ship arrives with access to international trade and technology that will develop the savage land, whether oil, gold or whatever that had currently been of no use to the savages. i'm not sure myself, but if they had to drill on my land for oil i wouldn't expect half the profit. blacks should have had an education, even as slaves. the bias is in creating black invention myths, one i just saw on MASH last night, charles drew
A white ship fights with its european neighbours for the right to grab slave labour, with poor return and NO access to International Trade only exploitation of Gun Technology to smooth negotiations in robbing the land. Gold and oil tin rubber cocoa diamonds were used by Blacks from Nigeria to Egypt and Namibia. African born blacks are the most Educated ethnic group by degree in the US (US Census Bureau). Look up the person behind the name THE REAL McCOY then tell me blacks dont invent
"Are there genetic differences in intelligence between blacks and whites?"
Well lets look into your question. what is black and what is white first? if you can define that for me you will have your answer to all debates on this subject. Your question has failed before it has begun because race is a social construct, so you are trying to explore intelligence as a function of a social construct that developed only 400yrs ago . When u grasp that you will begin to understand the silence
Are people with substantial (i.e. 80%+) sub-Saharan African heritage less intelligent, on average, than people with substantial European or East Asian heritage?
What a silly question. The answer of course is NO. Intellect is not split amongst human beings on the basis of melanin content or bone density. these are phentypic changes selected to ensure survival regarding the sun.
There is no white man job or role that cannot be filled by someone qualified of a different ethnicity. You have to be incredibly stupid and uneducated to think otherwise.
of course they are less intelligent, its not even close, its wide margin... richard lynn, arthur jensen, Phillipe rushton, et al...
rayban uses selective immigration policy to dictate some afrocentric superiority that does not exist, he only proves that some african blacks are very smart, but on the whole its a sad case of inferiority for africa and all too obvious, unless you are black and bias on this issue and/or willfully ignorant...
Not to mention that he doesn't specify whether the immigrants are sub-Saharan Africans or Northern Africans. Also, African immigrants benefit from affirmative as much as do American blacks, so citing their educational "achievements" is rather absurd.
But I agree that this debate is silly. Scientists have literally tested millions of blacks and have always found that they score at least 15 points lower than whites. Even rich blacks score lower than poor whites.
on your last line i'll give you a 2005 SAT score snapshot of class and achievement relative to race, and don't forget, blacks in USA have 15% white genetic material at least, i've seen stats that say upwards of 25%, more study is needed... i use a study of about 1000 blacks in 10 usa cities...
NO WONDER
PeeGeeBeeDee 1 week ago
Also something to note is that the IQ of a certain Race averages. For negros it means if you let like 110IQ negros into your nation, their children will be like IQ80 or so - and there goes down your nation!
WakeUpSleepIsDeath 4 months ago
@WakeUpSleepIsDeath
And the truth is that you belong to the bottom end of the distribution curve if you actually believe the intellectually most black people are benath you. That is hilarious outlandish foolishness considering that African immigrants outscore every other ethnic group for degree attainment in the west according to US Census Bureau data available for download now in PDF from government website. You racist clown.
Raybanmonster 3 months ago
@Raybanmonster "And the truth is that you belong to the bottom end of the distribution curve if you actually believe the intellectually most black people are benath[sic] you."
Patent nonsense. I have an IQ of 131, measured professionally. Do all of the professors who think niggers are dumb lie at the bottom of the distribution? Does Rushton? Does James Watson? So all one has to do is say "I think the race IQ gap is genetic" and suddenly they have the lowest IQ? You are making up shit.
HeCameHeSawGROID 3 months ago
@HeCameHeSawGROID
Phwahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaa
Phwahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaa
what makes you think Im interested in that crock of shit? Phwahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaa
Raybanmonster 3 months ago
@Raybanmonster Of course not. You have a thick impenetrable skull. I write for others.
HeCameHeSawGROID 3 months ago
the intellectual deficit between other races is most clear when putting a group of white scientists in a room with those of say indian, pakistani, and african descent. say an international conference, the disparities become clear just observing the understanding, ability and comms skills of whites compared to indians and stark compared to blacks, even if u put a group of all american scientists in a room, its clear, whites will naturally come up on top. & im not white people ok. its hard reality
mikefan09 10 months ago
@mikefan09
Phwahahahahaaaaaaa what nonsens, clearly you have never witnessed a room full of Graduates or academics. Let me assure you such differences are not clear at all when they are grouped in the same room. To imply such a stupid thing absolutely tells us how much of a Nigger you really are. My corned beef skinned filthy white Nigger... you are so ignorant I can tell you need to hit the books,
Raybanmonster 7 months ago
@Raybanmonster what this lecturer is saying is true. and at least i can read, how long did it take u to comprehend my comment nig nog? spent years with academics and graduates and u r completely wrong, thats exactly where the differences shine out! the blacks r always struggling or at the most simply on point, nothing exceptional and no innovative, creative thinking there, same with the indians/paks, very little genuine insight and rarely lateral or original thinking that really is the whitemans
mikefan09 7 months ago
@mikefan09
Phwahahahaaaaaaa So what you mean to say is that YOU are BETTER than ME. Phwahahahahahaaaa.
Wake up stupid dick... what colour is your president?
Why are black people actually black? Could it be that they are from a continent where the temperature reaches 40degrees and access to water / drought is common? lolol
Do you think every country in the world profited from slavery?
LEARN TO THINK. and by the way what exactly HAVE YOU done with all yr white advantage? oh I know NOTHING much!
Raybanmonster 7 months ago
u dont know wot a book is, nigger, who told u about book!?
mikefan09 7 months ago
@mikefan09
Phwahahahahaaaaaaaa
My corned beef skinned NIGGER, you carry on believing what you want to believe, but notice that you are not the US president, you didnt go to Havard and despite all that white advantage you have studied nothing , invented nothing and shown no abilities whatsoever. You manual labour dick headed Nigger
Raybanmonster 7 months ago
@Raybanmonster ok this is getting silly, but for some fun i wil stoop down to your mindless level, you probably havent even noticed that u didnt put forward any intellectual argument but as befitting your racial degeneracy u simply resorted to non sensical insults. so here u go, somehting u can undrstand, yur a nigger, nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger! i dont even like this word or racial insults, i prefer the science, but u r a stupid fuck so...working class monkey. u dont knw shit nigga!
mikefan09 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Raybanmonster I witnessed a room full of graduates many times. There were no blacks so I can't comment on this point.
HeCameHeSawGROID 4 months ago
@HeCameHeSawGROID
No one believes that my little internet pest that follows me wherever I go.
Find a new owner
Raybanmonster 3 months ago
@twatster Great! Claim that you "own" me. That's gonna work.
HeCameHeSawGROID 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HeCameHeSawGROID
my pet racist clown who follows me everywhere I go.
Raybanmonster 3 months ago
"Stalking the wild taboo"... great article.
aplatt65 1 year ago
@aplatt65
Phwahahahahaaaaaaa
Articles written by ignorant Psuedo-scientists claiming intellectual prowess but are really just lost misguided twits who are scrambling to find credibility in the scientific community. In fact Jaraed Taylor is pilloried like Rushton for thier utter banal racism.. and you a jackass thinks these are "great articles"? Phwahahahahahaaaa MY NIGGER.
Raybanmonster 7 months ago
Degree U.S. Population African Asian Europe, Russia & Canada
College Degree 23.10% 43.80% 42.50% 28.90%
Advanced Degree2 .60% 8.20% 6.80% 5.80%
SOURCE: 2000 US CENSUS Estimates indicate that a significant percentage of black students at elite universities are African or the children of African immigrants, a notable example of this is Barack Obama.
OH DEAR... HOW DO YOU DEAL WITH THIS GOVERNMENT CERTIFIED DATA ABOUT BLACK PEOPLE?
Entanglement9 1 year ago
I'm white (and a bit asian)..but I wonder if the world would be a much better place if asians ruled the world. I think in a way it would, because they do seem smart, long term thinkers.
However, plainly looking at the results I would wonder if it would really workout. Only japan and recently korea have shown to become wealthy. I find it intruiging why there has been "white supremacy" while tests suggest asians would have the benefit of being smarter on average (well in the tests)
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
Let's take dogs as an example. All dogs are 1 race (meaning they can mate and have children). However, it is pretty much known that some dogs are better at some things than others. The others are better at something else. Because this is not about humans, there is not so much taboo on this as on human races. They always pick the same dogs for the same kind of tasks/"jobs"for a reason. I have yet to see a poodle or a pitbull becoming a police dog...(I'm sure its possible but it will be harder)
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
The talent of Tiger woods may or may not be the exception to the rule. I think concluding things out of single, or limited amount of cases can be a tricky field, mostly for the fact that one can find enough exceptions to any rule that in that way of reasoning take down the general pattern in anything. Let's say most people on earth have black hair (which is true) can in my opinion not be brought down by showing 100 people with blonde hair. Total amounts should be compared to come to averages
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
I think quotes like "those stupid chinese" do not really mean too much in my opnion, mostly in the sense that if someone is working in another country, and does not speak the language well or at all, and is doing a simple job, it can easily *seem* this person is dumb, while there have been many cases where a man was a doctor in his own country, but after moving to another country (for savety) they had no other choice than simple jobs because of the language barriere or chances
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
What I've always founded interesting is the relation between interest and 'ability/skill' between people. People seem to a certain extend to be better at the things they're good at, although this is also often not the case(just look at 'idols').
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
I partly agree. I think generally alot of people are just interested in subjects. my sister for example majored in medical biology, not becuse she was interested in a good job, money or anything, but just because she was always facinated by the subject. My parents never even asked us to do schoolwork as long as we were happy. We were given total freedom (parents were ex-hippies, so you can imagine what kinda freedom). I think "interest" is somewhat genetic..like fetishes, sexual preference..etc
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
I think in the first place not anyone is *better* than one another, being it race , gender, sexual preference..I'm all fine with it.
However, I do think that if you for example compare it with the gender thing, it may be more politically correct to say women are just good at math as men, but averages and the brain development behind it has always shown it is 'logical' men are better at math, and women better at for example communication.It does not mean anyone is'better',but they're different
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
Just from observation I've often had the impression there could be differenes in either long term or short term investments and rewards among the different races. it always seems (to me) that that for example asians are *very*"submissive"/long time thinkers, pretty much planning their life out,without taking any risk at all anywhere (avoiding risks).On the other hand, blacks seem to be more willing to take bigger 'risks' for a possibility of a bigger reward (crime can be good income if done well
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
Reading alot of comments here makes me wonder why all these *intelligent* exceptions to the rule (and I do not mean*intelligent* sarcasticly)take themself as an example of the rule,and conclude a theory about *averages*can not be true.One would say it does not take*that* much intelligence to realise that an *average* is an average. That's all..
I were a dumb eastern asian person , and I would come here saying"see I'm DUMB"so south-east asians CAN'T be smart. Would you take him seriously?
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
WHAT I love about Levin is that he was snubbed by the AmRen membership...boob
ChristiansMustLearn 1 year ago
When are we going to admit that blacks are an under evolved sub species and that to have them in our society will inevitably drag that society down?
ArthurHilty 2 years ago 12
Gracias por compartirlo amigo
CINC0RR0SAS 2 years ago
but youll still take a heart from a dead black man or his blood to support your ailing life. What a fucking prick you are, your just jealous. get on with your life, a black man isnt the reason for your problems asshole, you caused all those problems yourself.
Raybanmonster 2 years ago
ya u got good hearts, i bet if i had a dead black man heart i could run twice as fast
koviack 1 year ago
@ArthurHilty
Greetings, sir--I'm Black, in a Ph.D program, and scored 1380 on my GRE's with a 5.5 in the writing section...I'm CERTAINLY not "under evolved," as you claimed lol.
dhills2009 1 year ago
@dhills2009 wrote: "I'm CERTAINLY not "under evolved," as you claimed..."
I would agree that it's wrong for the person who you quote to have written what he did. Not only is it an intemperate thing to write, it's scientifically meaningless and unmeasurable.
Having said that, I must add that everything that Levin spoke about here seems reasonable. It's just that when discussing topics like this one must speak with as much precision as possible.
kenp3L 1 year ago
@dhills2009 You are proof that there are exceptions to every rule. Just as there are blacks (and whites) at either end of the spectrum (with most being in the middle). The thing is, intelligent whites are the RULE, not the exception, whereas intelligent blacks are the EXCEPTION, not the rule.
Chana1313 1 year ago
@Chana1313
No...I will never believe that. Granted, I test well (always have), but a lot of what we call "intelligence" is environmental. I guarantee, if situations were reversed, and whites were enslaved and blacks were the majority, the IQ testing would be totally reversed...guaranteed. Intelligence is NOT genetic, because if that were the case, neither my mom or dad would have a masters degree; they grew up modestly and without a lot of means---EXCEPT for a disciplined ENVIRONMENT.
dhills2009 1 year ago
FY, I'm from the south, and having done my masters in the north and now my Ph.D back in the south, I say boldly, there's moronic whites in both regions. I've competed against races everywhere, and outperformed them everytime...so I buy into "exceptions." There is only environment and access...that's all that is needed for intelligence. Unfortunately, blacks have had to endure the worst...hampering creativity and IQ along the way.
dhills2009 1 year ago
@dhills2009
I DON'T by into exceptions** (forgive the typo)
dhills2009 1 year ago
@Chana1313
Lastly, (as I work on german translations lol)--I'd argue that your, and people like Levin's insistence on the 'lesser nature' of black IQ, is really an insidious attempt to try make us believe those 'stats' about ourselves in an effort to promote the decline of black self-esteem. If that's your motivation, allow me to respond in the following: you'll be waiting long time... The day of black minstrelsy is over...now you have blacks like me reconstructing the race...
dhills2009 1 year ago
@dhills2009 Frankly, I don't care why you think Dr Levin or I think as we do. I have studied this issue and it is the TRUTH. I'm half Southern Italian, and I recognize that the facts also show that Southern Italians in general have lower IQs than Northern Italians. You should accept the TRUTH regardless.
Chana1313 1 year ago 14
@Chana1313
Hogwash--The moment one accepts the "truths" of the dominant class for oneself, one essentially assigns to themselves an inferior label--I refuse to do that. I also find it comical/curious that your argumentation began talking about the lower IQs of of Southern Italians, but you somehow are an exception due to your Jewish ancestry; are you just lucky? I, too, have Jewish heritage, does my academic success and high IQ owe itself to my Jewish heritage as well? lol
dhills2009 1 year ago
@Chana1313
Bottom line, all this foolishness about race and IQ is another in a long line of attempts to institutionalize white supremacy. That is, if you can validate black de-humanity (i.e. inferiority), it becomes all the more easy to deem us no-things--non-entities. Clearly, with me and my family (all of whom are educationed and solidly middle class), as well as thousands of other black families, your attempts fail. WE (educated minorities) are growing.
dhills2009 1 year ago
@dhills2009
forgive the typo..."educated" lol
dhills2009 1 year ago
Comment removed
dhills2009 1 year ago
@Chana1313 Stop it!!! do you think you will always be able to avoid me? well here I am and I will comment on this stupid remark: you find it easy to accept the lower average IQ of Southern Italians to Northerners because you are still Italian! your whitness provides you with enough reason for an inflated opinion of yourself. Would you be willing to accept the fact that 15 % of blacks have higher IQs than whites and therefore I could have a higher IQ than you?
genious4real 1 year ago
@Chana1313
oh really? its truth is it? lololol. So you believe that all countries start out with the same level of resources and access to them and the same weather. You also believe that drought of Malaria or heat have no effect whatsoever on the prospects of a country do you? you think intelligence drives these things??? Phwahahahahahaaa
You are an uneducated racist dofus... this makes you actually a corned beef skinned white jackass Nigger... oh yes it does... MY NIGGER
Raybanmonster 7 months ago
@Chana1313 Warriors of truth at the end always wins. I am Pole and far from denying that northern Europeans are in general more intelligent then the other side.
powstaniecpolski 5 months ago
@ArthurHilty
I'd say the same for rednecks in the deep South. I mean, with all the raping, incest, and serial murders.
kelizez 1 year ago
@ArthurHilty
So what you are trying to imply is that YOU SOMEHOW DRAG SOCIETY UPWARDS by your presence huh? Well then let me ask u two questions.
What is it about YOU that lifts a society because gfrom where Im standing, you are not talented intellectually and Im guessing you have not invented, patented anything or made it to the white House right? Are you a hotshot lawyer? Doctor? lol. Are you better than the 5000 BLACK Doctors a year the US imports to meet the numbers? ?
No, My white Nigger
Raybanmonster 7 months ago
There are NOT very few black scientists actually that is a misnomer. that is a US issue. African born blacks are the most educated ethnic group in the USA. Funny how that information made available by the government USA via thier regular PDFs for free download, at the US census bureau has ONCE AGAIN been ignored, as such we have hot gasses from aman who should have done his homework. AmREN is a joke, look at the people involved, No Harvard, No Oxfored Cambridge no MIT NOTHING GREAT. GO FIGURE
Raybanmonster 2 years ago
Africans are inferior that is very observable in Africa
Funny that, because when I look back at Colonialism, almost every European country failed to conquer Africa in the manner originally intended, why? because they couldnt take the heat or the malaria or the intensity of the sun. Thats why they abandoned so many mines, so much trade, IN LAND. So I dont think Africans are inferior at all. Even you are not superior in intellectual ability as a white man to me. Thats a guarantee
Raybanmonster 2 years ago
"almost every European country failed to conquer Africa in the manner originally intended, why"
Lol. the British harvested Africa for everything they had!
De Beers Mining, British South Africa Company etc etc
Anything of value, we conquered with absolute ease, westerners still own most of the resources....
"because they couldnt take the heat or the malaria or the intensity of the sun."
ROFL
Obviously......
That has to be the stupidest thing i have ever heard?
bettertobealive 2 years ago
Is that why we had the colony of Australia for so long? The one that is still alligned to the crown. Because we can't take the "intensity of the sun"?
bettertobealive 2 years ago
The fact is, many of our colonies cost more in expenditure than they gave us in profit. Especially Africa, there was nothing to gain except natural resources, which we already controlled.
bettertobealive 2 years ago
While you were chanting round the fire, waving spears and sticks around. We were inventing things like trains and rifles and gatling guns, lol.
bettertobealive 2 years ago
The only real problem the British had were the Boers, and they were Europeans lol.
bettertobealive 2 years ago
In your ill considered laughable pontification you didnt talk about the Zulus or the many factious fights that led to the pull outs. To say britain took everything it got before they left is ignorant of the political ramifications of that behaviour which are still to be fully redeemed. Man you have no idea about things in any reasonable context at all. What about you? stop hiding behind other people youve never met. What is magnificent about your white self Vs me? oh I know, NOTHING. lololol
Raybanmonster 2 years ago
I have a question 4 any white person. this question is not an attempt to b clever, it is an attempt to get to the core of the issue. the question is thus: LETS ASSUME BLACKS HAVE INFERIOR COGNITIVE ABILITIES TO WHITES. IF EXPOSING IT IS NOT BECAUSE OF A NEED TO FEEL SUPERIOR, WHAT WOULD THE REASON BE? THIS IS IN LARGE CAPS BECAUSE I DO WANT THE OPINION OF YOUTUBERS.
genious4real 2 years ago
"genious4real"
What a suitable name....
A need to feel superior? We are superior, this has been pointed out, we don't have a need to feel anything as we are confident in our own abilities, however it really doesn't upset me to say that Chinese do better on IQ tests, partly because they are really uncreative bastards, partly because im glad im at least not african.
bettertobealive 2 years ago
Im glad to be of African decent. Black African immigrants ARE THE MOST educated by degree of ALL ethnic groups in the USA. Not even the Asians beat them collectively. Isnt that a contrast of FACT compared to the hyperbolee we hear about this supposed "low black IQ", which is just about school kids in inner city scoring low and then taken by idiots to be representative of all black people.
Its Ironic, the ethnic group in the US mixed mostly with white (black US x-slaves) have lowest IQ score
Raybanmonster 2 years ago
Africans are a transient species, they are living proof of evolution.
bettertobealive 2 years ago
I'd love to see these statistics you keep espousing, besides you can make statistics fit any picture you want, if you warp them enough. Africans are inferior that is very observable in Africa, we don't need statistics to prove that.
bettertobealive 2 years ago
Raybanmonster stole my thunder but i do have to agree! since caribean and other non-american blacks on average score higher than black americans it appears that mixing with whites has in fact lowered our IQ! and its not the chinese that score higher; its all asians. even those whos second language is english. as far as the Chinese being uncreative, how can that be when everything in your house is made by them? they r also super smart since they control ur economy. damn u guys r stupid.
genious4real 2 years ago
The Chinese didn't invent the things they are making, they copied it from westerners .They only have low tech manufacturing and agriculture with a realtively small service sector - the service sector is where the highest profit margins are. China also has some of the highest levels of debt. If you look at GDP per capita, China is doing terribly. Japan has a larger and vastly more high-tech economy than China.
It is you who looks intellectually defficient.
bettertobealive 2 years ago
OKAY HERE WE GO! if the chinese have a small service sector and they still manage to sell ur ideas back to u i would say the joke is on u! 2, whatever their dept your money from purchasing their products will help lower it. 3, the japanese do have a larger and vastly superior high-tech economy than china and they too r laughing at u all the way to the bank! amazingly, ur reluctance to give any credit to the chinese wont result in tacking the "made in china" stamp of everything u own! NICE TRY.
genious4real 2 years ago
I would say the fact that one would make a purchase in the first place from the Chinese shows that the Chinese can make me profitable. thats basic economics, both win so your point is blunt.
Do you think Japan and China share different intellectual capabilities or total capacity then? (which is different from an IQ test score). Do you think the reason North and South Korea are different is because of Intellect? Really? think again and extrapolate globally
Raybanmonster 2 years ago
THIS IS MY POINT: the psycological profession has determined that IQ does not measure intelligence and what it does measure is logical-mathematical ability. that would expalin why doctors and engineers tendd to score higher. because that ability is developed amongst groups that place a value on technical problem solving and advancement they will score higher on those tests hence the asians score on average, the highest. since math related subjects r mastered by memorizing the relationship.
genious4real 2 years ago
@genious4real
Do "memorizing relationships" not more or less define intelligence? I could argue the' memorizing' part, but the 'relationship' between things is what makes us intelligent creatures. We can see a stone and know how soft the stone is in comparison to something else and conclude things from it..
Remembering the dictionary will not make anyone smart (on a usefull way)..yet see the relationships between things is where IMHO "intelligence" lies.Relations form theories form inventions
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull If you could argue the "memorizing" part, you would sir!! I don't doubt in any way that if you could further prove me wrong you would. You cannot escape the fact that if I ask you what 10 * 10 is you will answer quickly but not before a process of recollection takes place. as for blacks, since we live in the only nation buit on the idea that we are not human, just having SOME DOCTORS, LAWYERS AND ENGINEERS says that if not intelligent, we are super resourceful. I will take either.
genious4real 1 year ago
@genious4real
Hi genious4real.What I was saying is that there are several ways to look at 'intelligence' and that in my idea intelligence that is usefull, is mostly the relationship between things, and not "facts" as some people sometimes think. One can learn anyone 1000 facts,but in my opinion (see opnion) I would say that I would say the persons are intelligent who are able to *use* that knowledge and build further on it.
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull I agree with you. In fact sir your definition is the one most accepted by unbiased experts in the fields that usually define it. Linda Gottfredson says, .....rather it reflects a broader and deeper capability for comprehending our surroundings -"catching on", "making sense", of things, or "figuring out" what to do. So you see, you are in great company.
genious4real 1 year ago
@genious4real
well, that's good to hear, I think? or are you sarcastic? You seem more informed than i am (I have not read too much about this subject)
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull No Sir!!! I am serious. Not only do I agree with you (no big deal since I am black and as a result would have a preference for your definition), but yes, after the study of so-called "over achievers" "experts" have redefined intelligence in a way that fits your model. A great book Sir: INTELLIGENCE AND HOW TO GET IT (WHY SCHOOLS AND CULTURES COUNT) Richard E Nisbett.
genious4real 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull
it's not too known that some people with autism seem very bright with some things, and are able to store up to 10.000 simple facts. What makes them remember every detail is actually 'missing' the *filter* that most people do have.If wehave 10 days of your life which are the same, our brains filters out unimportant things, and saves "important" things and how they are related to other things. That is pretty much how the human brain has "evolved", while not growing 100 times bigger
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull
(part 2 about autism)
This is why people with (certain types of) autism often get very confused if 1 detail in a situation is different (for example the lamp has moved a bit in the room) , because *for them* the whole situation seems new. There is a difference, so it's new information without being compared to older information
Other people can 'relate' that the room is problably the same (rough comparison with older memory) and only 1 item has changed, which is no big deal
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull YES! what you said about "our brains filter out unimportant things". That is why many experts and just bright people like myself say so many blacks do not do well on ceratin tests. It simply is not important to them. The same reason is given for the difference in IQ between whites from agricultural America to the America of the present. I personally found out how many ounces were in a kilo from a local drug dealer!! He hated math, but it was "important" to know THAT.
genious4real 1 year ago
@genious4real
ok intersting view. What do you think makes blacks on average less interested in typcial school related subjects?
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull Well Sir, Motivation and the forces behind it are not given the study they deserve. I majored in Philosophy and minored in Psych. That said, most people don't know or don't reveal that you could read the masterpieces of SIGMUND F, ABE MASLOW, KAREN HORNEY, A ADLER, JUNG, ALBERT ELLIS, CARL ROGERS, JEAN PIAGET and other White greats of the Psychological profession and you would be hardpressed to find ONE reference to race!!! The great ones knew PEOPLE ARE PEOPLE! If a person..
genious4real 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull 2) if a person does not believe an education will result in a decent quality of life they will not likely excel in much that relates to it. Let me use myself as an example: My mother read like a fanatic. Everything from comparative religion to das Kapital. I grew to love philosophy (my favorite being Martin Hiedegger although his being a nazi causes me big problems). I majored in it and never understood why people (whites,asians,blacks) had such a hard time in class because I did
genious4real 1 year ago
@genious4real
A third possibllity is that someone for some reason 'genetically' is better at something (let's say from very early childhood - ruling out nurture) and may *not* be too interested in that subject, yet *does* have good abilities in a certain area (be it math, psychology, whatever etc)
Personally I know ther are subjects I suck at , yet would like to be better at, and there are things I love and I'm good at , and there are things I'm good at, yet have little interst in
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull
Those things are a bit "chicken & egg - what was first* logic. pretty intersting. I think to what humans call "succeed in life " , meaning more money , better job etc.. can be caused by either 3 of those "possibilies" in an individual
(taken in consideration this interest of that person has in some degree an overlap with a possible job - I mean, you can be good at pissing in the air, but it's quite useless for jobs lol)
(personallity i think happyness is #1 for a good life)
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull
i must say I quite share your view on math VS philosphopy. Math is pretty "limited" in it's resources. I mean that when one does a calculation, I think there is much more a limited on things you can "bring in", while with philosphy, one can pretty much bring in every detail about life or a subject into the solution. It's a much broader field, yet less stricly defined, which makes it more interesting. It also requires a bit more 'guessing' which is in a way interesting too
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull
Philosphy is more a bit like an open ending in a book or movie. It is not fully 'completed', which makes you think about it much longer, in comparison to a happy end. If the end is happy, there is not much more left to think about. In a way it's a calculation that has been solved totally.
Unsolved things are often more interesting (at least in my opinion) because there is always room for improvement and coming closer to the real truth, which problably still will not be reached
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull two very good books are: TALENT IS OVERRATED AND THE GENIUS IN ALL OF US. In TIOR a very good example of the myth of talent and "genetically" better is given in the example of tiger woods: The author points out that whilst many say tiger was "naturally' gifted, he started playing golf at 4 years of age and by the time most people had heard of him he was in fact 17 and had been having one on one lessons in an intense manner for 13 years! it talks about deliberate practice.
genious4real 1 year ago
@genious4real
Well yes I agree that 'determination'plays a big role *too*, but as I'm sure you have experienced in your life there are things when you start out later or at the same time as someone else, but pick things up easier than this person, while while this person is just as passionate or even more passionate about the subject than you, but in the end manages to produce lower results/achievements/skill (this goes for about any kind of subject)
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
I think the people who are often considered "best" in their field both had to some agree *talent* which was *extra boosted* with experience. Everyone has a bit of a different way of reasoning and thinking. Some ways match certain fields better than others. If you find it very easy to do math on highschool (without more time enjoyment or more investment than others) then I would call a person talented in that field.
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull 2) it talks about deliberate practice and how it leads to being above average in the chosen field. It is also worth noting that asians who score high on intelligence tests and seemingly in most that they do have for the most part said that it was a matter of priorities, determination and focus and not at all innate ability! more than a few quotes can be found about "those stupid chinese" who worked on America's railroads!
genious4real 1 year ago
@genious4real
Let's say someone is very intuituif and can guess easily how others feel, because this person notices body language and facial expression more than others (women have this ability more than men)..then I am pretty sure that with equal amount of training, they will still have an advantage over the man (again: averages). Of course it's possible the man could *compensate* this by trying harder, investing more time..but at the top where everyone does their best, the women will be best
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull If we take golf for example, in what manner could someone credit their "good genes" for playing it well? Tiger is thin compared to others on the tour so it is said that it is his TECHNIQUE that results in his long drives. Other than that perhaps he could have gotten his personality that allows him to focus better, but little else can be said to come by way of genes. getting back to the role of focusing, some experts say that those with genius IQs are best and mostly found as ...
genious4real 1 year ago
@genious4real
To come back to tiger woods, I think he both had *good genes* for this particular field, and *both* invested alot of time in his achievement , giving him a strong advantage over both people who just possesed either one of them. There are alot of people with talents,that do not use them, which is pretty much a loss (IMHO)
I believe that In many (populair) fields both talent and determination are required for the top because of the rampant competition in those fields.
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull in support staff since they are limited in most things not of their specialty. This is most obvious in IT. as for talent being needed to reach the highest levels, again we have to understand that people bull shit their way to the top in many areas. The difference may be where one has to be physically sound, but in business for example the talents concerning manipulation, the courage to take chances and other such "people skills" play a large part. I will say this since there is .
genious4real 1 year ago
@genious4real
I totally agree on people bullshitting their way to the top. I think CEO's are often not the smartest people, but people with a decent intelligence and willingly to take risks, and have a bit of dominant personality traits , in order to 'order' the other people around. I think this is why whites are generally wealthier than south east asians. S.E asians could be more intelligent in some ways, but I think their nature is not 'dominant' enough to 'rule/invent/take risks etc
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull since there is something to be said for getting to the point, it is now known that black IQ is growing at a faster pace than white IQ (although whites still score higher on the average) and that growth can be straced directly back and to the jim crow era and followed up to now. In other words black IQ grows in accordance to the freedom to pursue knowledge (this according to James R Flynn in WHAT IS INTELLIGENCE). He goes on to point out that the average black has the IQ of ..
genious4real 1 year ago
@genious4real
I'm for familair with "jim crow era"...what is it? (my first language is not english , and neither I'm from the usa - although I do not say this era is something american)
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull
I meant to say Ï'm not familair with "jim crow era" (typo)
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull Thank you for asking. First let me give you an opening to it: The first black slave came to america in roughly 1619. slavery was "abolished" in 1887 (AFTER ENGLAND AND FRANCE!). A called reconstruction followed that was supposed to let blacks take an active part in American life. During that time blacks started businesses and even ran and won in the senate and congress. racist whites could not stomach the black progress and the period of reconstruction ended and blacks...
genious4real 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull were returned to thier second class status. Businesses were burned down and positions of power were voted away in favor of racist whites. The laws known as "jim crow" were put in place to return blacks to a position of servitude. Lynchings took place daily, burnings of blacks alive took place where body parts were cut off and given to white mayors and governers to keep and admire. All of this took place in the 20th century. America was only joined by NAZI GERMANY, STALIN'S RUSSIA
genious4real 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull AND MAO'S CHINA. As for white supremecy, if you see how it was accomplished you will see a great deal of threat and warfare. If one has a gun they can have the IQ of a termite, the power is with the barrel. A buddy of mine who has a marketing firm says the idea that America is a stern by "good" country is the best marketing ploy in the history of selling goods, services or images. Asians could rule well, Buddhist asians that is.
genious4real 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull as a white who lived in America in 1955. Whilst that is not something I am on the face proud of, it does show somethings one of which is that the rise in black IQ comes in relation to the freedom to develop those things it measures. I also will say that much of my feelings towards the pointing out of black IQ would lesson if whites would consider the implications of asian IQs being higher then theirs. Sure they admit it is the case, but they are not willing to go as far as ..
genious4real 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull as far as saying asians should rule the world. whites unfortunately defend their"right of place" by pointing to a test that was devised to assure ALL french children of getting a proper education. I personnaly think the comparison to groups who have been only allowed to go to proper schools for a little over 40 years shows a character not worthing of imitating.
genious4real 1 year ago
@genious
I think it may go a little too far to say that whites think the most intelligent race or themself 'should be ruling the world'.I think there are very few people who actually think this should be the case.After all,there are only relatively few people in a country who actually 'rule'the country.Most people are just residents in the end.In any group of people you can find enough intelligent people to rule the country.However, it remains the question if those are selected (look at bush)
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull HAHAHA! I like that thing about Bush. Yes, you are right. As a young black boy I was told how speaking well was so important. Than the nation elects Bush! A man that butchers the language!
genious4real 1 year ago
@PowerRedBull 3) because I did not. To this day my white commie buddies say I am just "freekin far out" and "deep" and although it feels good to get such praise and hear such words, I know that I am just a product of my interest which happens to be Philosophy. I hate math (my professors say it's because I could not argue the answer) and I admire those who are good at it, but I understand it too is their interest! einstein was driven to prove newton wrong. He smelled terrible though!!
genious4real 1 year ago
@genious4real
What I found most interesting about this "interst VS skill" relation is where it exactly starts.
For example if someone notices they're good at something, chances they will further develop in that area and feel satisfied ("winners").
On the other hand one could argue that if someone has 'genetically' a certain interest, one will invest time and develop further in that area
(very feminine women for example generally have more interst in more 'feminine/girly subjects)
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
"its not the chinese that score higher; its all asians"
No it's not, only East-Asians score higher than Europeans. Any more illusory "facts" you would like to make up?
bettertobealive 2 years ago
ILL GO WITH ONLY THE EAST-ASIANS! my point was that ur idea that evolution maxed out with u is not true! as for u including urself into "European" pot, if u are american u should know that Europeans (even white ones) don't care 4 your kind much. If u r a European, u should know that ur stupidity is being faded out and rare across the seas. also, u told me to respond quickly as though i would not. as a black man who loves putting people like u in their place, i live for such things.
genious4real 2 years ago
C'mon speak up now...
bettertobealive 2 years ago
i will always speak up! im a big show off and i find ur logic very easy to poke wholes in. i will however ask u to show how worthy u r of my time by proving u know what IQ actually is. i ask that because my unknown freind raybanmonster have to work from the premise that u people know what it is and i dont think u do. your kind never know what ur talking about, thats all part of being white in america. George W proved that. okay? what is IQ. Answer that then I will take u apart.
genious4real 2 years ago
IQ is intelligence Quotient. It is a cognitive test aimed at measuring speed and depth of mental processing. the IQ test does capture some part of intelligence but not all intelligence at all eg it wont capture great sportsmen or artist. The test comes in so many forms that many have discredited its use for comparison purposes as the test is not standardised linguistically, although many think it is actually it hasnt. Now explain to me the diff between Phenotype and Genotype.
Raybanmonster 2 years ago
PART 2: between symbols it is an ability that can be developed in anyone who has not suffered from or is born with a brain injury. as 4 phenotype, it in small terms thus: characteristics of org that results from genes and envirnment. genotype is usually used to describe the genetic makeup of an org. most of us r fairly smart! THE POINT IS WHAT IS INTELLIGENCE? DO IQ TESTS MEASURE IT? DOES ONE RACE HAVE A MONOPOLY ON IT? IS IT INFLUENCED BY EXTERNAL FORCES IE, EXP, EDU, ENV. THOSE R THE POINTS.
genious4real 2 years ago
wELL THE FACT THAT ANYONE CAN LEARN THIS ABILITY (TO VARYING DEGREES OF SPEED) SUPPORTS MY ARGUMENT COMPLETELY.
gOOD, sO YOU UNDERSTAND THEN THAT WAY A PERSON LOOKS DOES NOT TELL US ABOUT THIER TOTAL GENETIC COMPLIMENT. UNLESS YOU ARE TRYING TO TELL US YOU THINK iq IS LINKED TO EYES COLOUR OR HAIR TYPE? LOL..
yOU ALSO SAID MOST OF US ARE FAIRLY SMART. CORRECT HUMANS ARE A SMART BUNCH REGARDLESS OF ETHNICITY, YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT GENES ANYONE HAS BECAUSE WERE ALL UNIQUE.
Raybanmonster 2 years ago
I AGREE.
genious4real 2 years ago
It is astonishing the amount of bigotry and poorly educated white people who think they understand science and can interpret the scientific findings of papers. Just because a substance looks like water it doesnt mean it will taste like water. Just because you see many blacks who are poor, doesnt mean its because they cant help themselves. No white country has successfully conquered an African country because of the Heat and the Malaria affecting 1 in 4 people in workforce. WAKE UP!
Raybanmonster 2 years ago
There is no selectivity that has taken place on the basis of intellect in the recent history of man. Just because some poor blacks are scoring low on an IQ test doesnt mean all black people have low IQ. Low IQ is congruent with family income. Black immigrant Africans are the MOST educated ethnic group in US. No gene has been found linked to intelligence directly. There is NO correlation between brain size & IQ, else short people / women would be inferior to tall / men & clearly this is no.
Raybanmonster 2 years ago
The correlation between brain size and IQ is .4.
How could there not be a correlation between brain size and IQ? If a large brain were not necessary for high intelligence, then guess what?
WE WOULDN'T HAVE BIG BRAINS!
Raybanmonster, you are just a bitter, stupid black person (yes, I know that's redundant).
jbz7890 2 years ago
Im a black Scientist from UK, there are many of us especialy in tech subjects. The reason is cultural and who are you to discuss this issue. What a disgrace.
Why is it that BLACK AFRICAN IMMIGRANTs are obtaining more degrees compared to the US population as a whole? This number would confer many blacks with a very hi IQ, and even if you adjust for only hi IQ blacks, there are too many obtaining degrees. Many blacks feel uncomfortable in which dominated environs becos of exclusion and racism
Raybanmonster 2 years ago
Because the only Africans that are allowed to immigrate are the ones that are smarter than average?
FunkmasterA997 2 years ago
But even the fact that the proportion of blacks attaining higher education is proportionately high, that figure still discredits any notion that a black IQ is somehow less. This is pure racist nonsense, swith off the light or use a phone and in many instances you cant tell what ethnicity someone is. Biology has no race, it just sees different people with differing levels of inherited protection against the SUN. It is daft to think there is intellectual benefit associated to such protection.
Raybanmonster 2 years ago
Protection against the sun (skin color) is one of the features set by common ancestry, or race. Other features can include bone structure, and characteristics of the eyes, liver, kidneys, stomach, blood, brain, or immune system.
Just because it's offensive doesn't automatically mean that it's incorrect.
FunkmasterA997 2 years ago
But since when was intelligence a multifaceted entity included here? Since when was intellect such a selectivity issue that somehow blacks lost out? There is no selectivity that has taken place on the basis of intellect.
Raybanmonster 2 years ago
The smarter people have better chat up lines= get laid more= have more children.
My two cents..
bettertobealive 2 years ago
what black people are they studying the ones in the ghetto
marauda777 2 years ago
with politically correct liberal lies running amok and negros overly protected on all fronts, its nice to hear the truth, that PEARLS BEFORE SWINE is the call and trend of the day, MATT. 7:6
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IS EVIL RACISM AGAINST WHITES AND ASIANS.
glorp896 3 years ago 2
truth? really? lol... there no truth in this video, just racist hyperbolee by those who ironically are ignorant of the true scientific picture.
Raybanmonster 2 years ago
and the true scientific picture of affirmative action is that point per point blacks get into college the easiest and asians the hardest... whites are the second most victimized by this per point on the SAT and hispanics also benefit wrongly but not as much as blacks... so that has been the break down of truth... i've seen the data - is the data ignorant, myself or just you?
glorp896 2 years ago
I thought you were trying to be err scientific?
If so youd note first that affirmative action does NOT actually pass a degree or do your coursework for you in any degree. Also I notice that good universities do not hand out degrees on the bais of race or skin colour. Whites are NOT victimized, they have it easiest., they have more inheritance per capita & dont have to deal with racial negativity daily, ironic how your thinking got you here isnt it?
Raybanmonster 2 years ago
no, point per point blacks gain entrance to college more than whites with the same score, this is STEALING, the racism has reversed and harms a greater group, as opposed to racism against blacks which is less of a loss of potential... blacks create their racial negativity, not simply by being black... ironic and more to the point counter productive long term to REenslave blacks from africa in the new world, should have got the irish, etc...
glorp896 2 years ago
glorp896
"Stealing"? from who exactly, you as a bordeline student? is that the standard you are discussing? Can you not see that black people descended from slaves in US have come from something that is wrong? Are you not aware that they faced much hardship and unfairness? The biggest damaging issue was lack of education which contrasts heavily with black African immigrants as the most Educated ethnic group of All including indigenous groups!
Raybanmonster 2 years ago
and what should we do then? ignore the ravages and exploitation of a continent by white slavemasters who fuelled much of thier industrialization through slave labour and low cost goods from a deliberately divided Africa? and let the people who were denied access to their past and history again denied access to education? when we know that the police and many white people are still showing negative bias toward black intellectual talent? Sure..whatever
Raybanmonster 2 years ago
what % of profit should a savage receive in the following case: a white ship arrives with access to international trade and technology that will develop the savage land, whether oil, gold or whatever that had currently been of no use to the savages. i'm not sure myself, but if they had to drill on my land for oil i wouldn't expect half the profit. blacks should have had an education, even as slaves. the bias is in creating black invention myths, one i just saw on MASH last night, charles drew
glorp896 2 years ago
Correction
A white ship fights with its european neighbours for the right to grab slave labour, with poor return and NO access to International Trade only exploitation of Gun Technology to smooth negotiations in robbing the land. Gold and oil tin rubber cocoa diamonds were used by Blacks from Nigeria to Egypt and Namibia. African born blacks are the most Educated ethnic group by degree in the US (US Census Bureau). Look up the person behind the name THE REAL McCOY then tell me blacks dont invent
Raybanmonster 2 years ago
You're trying to ignore the key issue in this debate.
Are there genetic differences in intelligence between blacks and whites?
That's the only question of relevance to this debate.
jbz7890 2 years ago
jbz7890
"Are there genetic differences in intelligence between blacks and whites?"
Well lets look into your question. what is black and what is white first? if you can define that for me you will have your answer to all debates on this subject. Your question has failed before it has begun because race is a social construct, so you are trying to explore intelligence as a function of a social construct that developed only 400yrs ago . When u grasp that you will begin to understand the silence
Raybanmonster 2 years ago
Again, you're trying to dodge the issue.
I'll rephrase my question:
Are people with substantial (i.e. 80%+) sub-Saharan African heritage less intelligent, on average, than people with substantial European or East Asian heritage?
jbz7890 2 years ago
jbz7890
What a silly question. The answer of course is NO. Intellect is not split amongst human beings on the basis of melanin content or bone density. these are phentypic changes selected to ensure survival regarding the sun.
There is no white man job or role that cannot be filled by someone qualified of a different ethnicity. You have to be incredibly stupid and uneducated to think otherwise.
Raybanmonster 2 years ago
of course they are less intelligent, its not even close, its wide margin... richard lynn, arthur jensen, Phillipe rushton, et al...
rayban uses selective immigration policy to dictate some afrocentric superiority that does not exist, he only proves that some african blacks are very smart, but on the whole its a sad case of inferiority for africa and all too obvious, unless you are black and bias on this issue and/or willfully ignorant...
glorp896 2 years ago
Not to mention that he doesn't specify whether the immigrants are sub-Saharan Africans or Northern Africans. Also, African immigrants benefit from affirmative as much as do American blacks, so citing their educational "achievements" is rather absurd.
But I agree that this debate is silly. Scientists have literally tested millions of blacks and have always found that they score at least 15 points lower than whites. Even rich blacks score lower than poor whites.
jbz7890 2 years ago
on your last line i'll give you a 2005 SAT score snapshot of class and achievement relative to race, and don't forget, blacks in USA have 15% white genetic material at least, i've seen stats that say upwards of 25%, more study is needed... i use a study of about 1000 blacks in 10 usa cities...
glorp896 2 years ago
Truth. the whole Truth, nothing but the Truth.
Net is for Truth.
Yes-No. True-false. Real-fake.
Right-wrong
Yes, No. our goal is to seek the Truth. Whatever the Truth maybe.
charlesdarwinxxx 3 years ago 2
lol.. what truth? quote me just one scientific fact from this video and Ill show you a scientific weakness
Raybanmonster 2 years ago
amren is a kike front.avoid these shenagins and idiots who are jew ass kissers.
rahul2col 3 years ago
Why do you think it is a front?
bbpro 3 years ago
Contrary to your racist opinion, there is no jewish conspiracy involving black people. Jews are not out to subjugate the white community
Raybanmonster 2 years ago