Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (22)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Dude I like the points you make but you take FOREVER to get there. You make the same points multiple times. Gotta move on to a different part of your argument eventually. And you dont have to repeat the same points you made in part 1 in part 2. But I do agree with everything you're saying.

  • Ray Comfort is a Fraud, he has quite the little empire selling books and DVD's this is why he makes the more ridiculous claims in creationism, its to drum up dollars from Christians, its sad...

  • After reading EWJ's comments below, I guess this is the last straw I can take from him. I actually felt sorry for him being judged just because he doesn't have a degree but his actions from his comments had shown me enough reason to judge him as an ignorant and arrogant prick who refused to consider other people's words as facts. LithodidMan, I think you just wasted your time on EWJ

  • 5-Sexual biology, his expertise. Where did females come from? Gets very irritated by this.

    He says, The reality is the sexes evolved a long time ago. Interesting, how do you know? Where you there? Why dont we see this happening today?

    6-Blood came first. Your opinion. OK.

    7-Transitional fossils. Your opinion.

  • 3-Ray Comfort, deer in head lights.

    Sort of like when I ask Atheists, How the Universe get created from nothing? And How did the first life form get created from nothing? It has never been observed so it must have been magic.

    He calls this word play. That the word created is what gets people to think creator. He believes in the steady state theory. Thats fine. I dont. I do think its brilliant.

  • "He calls this word play. "

    It's just dishonest to say that atheists think the universe came from nothing.

  • First of all, I feel like Im being talked to by Lars Ulrich. Itf funny to me, anyway, I just had to say that.

    1-I disagree that my papers would get published. I saw a note from a editor that would not publish Micheal Behes article.

    2-Dawkins. Your opinion.

  • EWJ - I responded to your comments in a video series: watch?v=Ybih_WE-w8I

  • EWJ is pretty typical of the YT evangelist. They read websites like AiG and so forth that have forewarned, "them there EVOlooshunists will say you haven't done your homework, but you HAVE done your homework and HERE it is for you!"

    He is staggeringly, STAGGERINGLY ignorant, and doesn't have the least remote idea that he's spouting nonsense. As with most cases, it's very likely he just does not care what the facts are.

  • How did the first simple cell develope from NOTHING?

  • The first cell did not develop from nothing and the origin of the first cell is not a part of biological evolution.

  • What did it develop from?

  • 1. Thta is irrelevant to the subject of biological evolution for the same reason that the origin of atoms is irrelevant to chemistry.

    2. It developed from chemicals that were probably already self-replicating.

    Evidence indicates life is not a binary state.

  • I'm holding up to watch all your evo of sex vids at once.

  • It is a good time to catch up on those - I am taking a break from that series and ended at a logical point.

  • Nice. You think those "actors and actresses"  are morally justified in what they do?

  • To which actors and actresses are you referring?

  • Your shirt needs more wolves

  • At least three, ey ?

  • hehe, keep em coming :)

  • I had a friend who went to Thailand and "evolved" a vagina...

  • lol, yes, I have heard of that happening

  • I don't know about you. but I don't laugh when genital mutilation is involved. I wince.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more