World At War: Occupation 2 of 5

[pmcmanus420]

You mean like how Muslims "categorize" the world into two halves: Muslims, or True Believers, and Infidels, or Those Only Worthy of Death?

[niteshmurti]

Nice documentary!

[Gragham77]

An interesting side note concerning categorization is that in the 17th century, a huge amount of foreigners made their family names Dutch; within a few generations, you couldn't discern the differences anymore. So in a way, the so-called "Arian blood" of the Dutch is plain nonsense, as we are in fact a melting pot of people from all parts of Europe.

Many folks choose to ignore this lil' detail when convenient, of course.

[sirdard1]

Looking at barbarism of Europeans on Jews, Muslims look like brothers of Jews.

[TheBelovedButterfly]

@sirdard1 except that Europeans aren't barbaric to Muslims.

[abbesieyes]

It was a religious questionaire, given cover by a racial question.

To be Jewish at the time was to be overwhelmingly Hebrew.

The target of the Roman Nazi Austrians...all non-RCC.

Those erradicated outright...Jews.

Those shipped off to be worked to death...Protestants.

Inquisition and Counter Reformation, writ Global.

[dutchgoing]

What does an 'English working-class accent' sound like then?  lol

[olivemike81]

You don't know who the true patriots are until you're forced to choose sides like the Dutch were. I'll tell you one thing, if this ever happens in America, after we eventually kick out the invaders I'm putting a bullet in the back of the head of every traitor I find.

[teslagod2003]

@olivemike81 LOL...

[pix042]

Notice how at 4:30 the street cleaner's English voiceover is in an English working class accent!

[abbesieyes]

Hmm. My first comment seems to have gone missing.

The first indicator of a tyranny...the catagorization of the population. Look at the level of catagorization undertaken in the nominally protestant 'west' since the pretext event of 9/11.

[pix042]

There is plenty of religious and racial categorisationm going on in Britain in the name of equality. Ok, the idea is to see that everyone type of person gets an equal chance but, neverheless, it is categorisation. Why not just ask people are you human? yes or no?

[abbesieyes]

Because catagorization is about denying the value of the target. It is ever easier to erradicate the value-less.

The idea behind catagorization is not to ensure everyone gets an equal chance. Only privacy and personal rights (not 'human' rights) can ever ensure said.

[harigeharing]

NEDERLAND!!!!!!!

[puzokutya]

those child movements are so gay.

[Nevenius]

09:43. Thomas Kretschmann!!!!

[daltonagre]

I live in Brazil.

[abbesieyes]

The 'catagorization' of all members of a society...one of the primary indicators of a tyranny. Note the amount of 'catagorization' being undertaken under the rubric of 'anti-terrorism' in the West.

[damoosebelly]

yeah...kinda like the categorization of Americans through hyphenation...sometimes you don't have to think global to see tyranny, sometimes it's all around you and coming from the sources that claim to aspire to unity

[abbesieyes]

"from the sources that claim to aspire to unity "

Interesting that you would put it that way damoosebelly...the greatest proponent of 'unity' being the greatest user of 'balkanization' as a wedge to impose their own unique form of unity - 'Rome'. The history repeats because the same old crowd uses the same old tactics, allied to new technology.

[damoosebelly]

i agree with you...on both your comments...George Washington saw this coming for us from the beginning...we have made the same mistake, allowing "career politicians" to take the government away from governance "by the people." when the people are no longer holding the reigns, the kings return to the throne...many don't realize it yet, but, after 20 years of elitist dynastic rule, we have just held the coronation of our first king...

[abbesieyes]

The coronationof our first king occured with the first 'Executive Order'...and that was long ago.

As was the groundwork for funding the new reign of the 'divine righters' - the one-two punch of the 13th ammendment and the establishment of the 'Federal Reserve'.

[damoosebelly]

the funny thing is that most people still don't understand that this is not a "side of the aisle" problem, but a viral invasion of the entire system...

someone recently asked me why i bother with such "ancient" history...*sarcasm on* it's a wonder we continue to repeat the mistakes of the past *sarcasm off*

i also find it interesting that people who claim the Constitution is outdated and irrelevant are the same ones that have, for decades, manipulated it to give them unchecked powers...

[abbesieyes]

Agreed. Few realize the implications of fractal reality (ie history must repeat). As to claims of 'irrelevancy'...well, the tyrant must always naysay reality. That is the basis of all sophistry, isn't it? Rome naysay'd reality for generations, benefited materially from it, and wishes to do so again. Note that every time they found many willing consorts...thus not all Americans are American, not all English are Englishmen, etc.

[TroyBilt007]

@damoosebelly What king are you talking about??? If you mean president Obama If I am not mistaken he was duly elected in a fair and honest election. If he runs again in 2012 the people will have the choice of voting for or against him. Personally, I will vote for him again. But KING....I think not. I remember people saying the same thing about Ronald Reagan and George W Bush.

[naltrexone23X]

@damoosebelly They have been saying this for years. Every time a president comes along who is different, the other side makes a fool out of him and nurtures conspiracies. I remeber when Kennedy was elected there were people who thought he would disband congress and put the US under Vatican rule...all because he was a Roman Catholic. I live in Austria and I miss being back in the US because it is still the most free nation. Try living in Russia to see real "elitists".