Guys, stop having political debates, like seriously grow up. Just let us celebrate a good man's birthday, and show our pride. Why are Yankees looking up this video anyway...? Some people are so dumb.
I can't believe that Lee was that king of bad guy; I think it is so easy to accuse.
If you 'd tell me that Adolf Hitler was a pleasant person; I couldn't tell you if you are right or wrong because I was not there! but history proved us that he was clever and intelligent but also he was a real serial killer. Concerning Lee, give me a real document; I could take a position.
Lee not only whipped slaves -- he would pay extra money for specialist to come in and whip some slaves. Verfied reports show Lee would personallly supervise the whippings and scream at slave girls while she was tortured. Lee then had salt brine poured on her wounds. Her crime? She ran away. Lee paid six times the regular fee to catch her and whip her. And he screamed at her while she was being whipped.
@PerpetualMotionTax I am sure that George Washington and Thomas Jefferson and many of our founding fathers whipped their slaves at one time or another.
Rebel -- Lee would scream at 14 year old girls as he had them tortured. Can you grasp the kind of fuck that would do that? He sure as fuck wasn't some honorable kind hearted guy who hated slavery. His whole plan to get rich was slavery -- all he had come from slaves, he even married an ugly fat woman cause she was going to inherit a big estate with 200 plus slaves.
He also regularly sold babies -- something many slavers refused to do. He did it frequently when he needed money
Rebel -- sorry dumb ass -- read what people then, even slave owners, were saying what was happening. Slavery was turning the fucks like Lee into monsters. Most of the Southern leaders were sociopaths, lunatics. Washington, Jefferson and that generation were not sociopaths and lunatics. The evil and perversions and cruelty of fucks like Lee, Davis, Yancey grew expotentially.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
STILL WAITING. Get on with it already. You CSA twats, are ALL mouth. First you were gonna whip the Yankees in 6 weeks. Then it was "One Reb can whip 10 Yankees". Then it was (and is) "We're gonna rise again".
WELL...145 years later...nuttin's happened.
Please bring it on, though. The legalized hunting of neo-reb terrrorists, would be quite sporting. I'd even treat myself to a new sniper rifle.
What is so funny about "Wolfencrow" is he lives in SOUTH CAROLINA lol. Do you run your mouth around town or just have big balls hiding behind a computer? Since you dont like the South, move back up to Pennsyshitty where your from loser.
REbel dumb fuck -- your pussy armies spent most of the time running from Union soldiers, or deserting. Did you know over 2/3 of your soldiers deserted? Did you know that most Southerners did NOT support the COnfederacy? Did you know that the South was taken over from 1820, by Slave Power lunatics, like Lee, Davis, Yancey, and stopped free speech, press, and real elections?
@PerpetualMotionTax LOL, another one of your stupid made up screen names? LOL!!!!
Two/Thirds of Confederates did not desert, how many times do I have to go over this with you? I realize your a bit slow and your IQ is well, way down there.
Rebel you are right. 2/3 did not desert. Try OVER 3/4. IN fact, toward the end, Confederate Generals Beauregard and Johnston met with Davis to tell him ALL the soldiers that could desert -- did. Those who stayed refused to fight one more minute. Got that? That's from Southern accounts at the time. Plus Davis HIMSELF said 2/3 of the soldiers deserted, and was begging for them to come back. I will send you his speech.
@LiarBoortz If Lee had lost that many men from desertion then how did he still have 50,000 men when Petersburg fell? By April 7th, 1865, Lee lost half his army with the battles of Five Forks, Saylor's Creek and several more lesser known battles. Lee did surrender 26,000 men. A far cry from "2/3 or 3/4".
Davis writing that is different then actually knowing the facts. This is the part where your very lost, never trust any numbers during the Civil War. I don't believe any of the losses.
Lee didnt surrender 26,000 men retard. In fact, I bet he couldn't find 2,000. The army was melting away. Confederate generals Johnston AND Beauregard told Davis in APril of 65, that virtuallly ALL the soldiers had DESERTED -- and took the horses! Those that didn't run, simply refused to fight anymore. That's what YOUR OWN generals said - not me. Davis said 2//3 a year before that./
@Taxfools Lord, how many face screen names are you going to make up? lol
It's called history, Lee surrendered around 26,000 men. How we know that is because Union officers took the names of the Confederates to issue their paroles.
Rebel -- I'd like to see those names. There were troops around -- but as Johnston and Beauregard told Davis -- most had run away, and those who stayed refused to fight.
I doubt very much the Union took down 26,000 names of Confederate soldiers as surrender. Most men had run off. Show me the list.
@LiarBoortz Go look it up, this is so simple. Everyone here reading this is going to agree with me that General Lee surrendered 26,000 men. Now several Infantry regiments and batteries took the wrong roads and actually ended up making it to General Johnston's army in North Carolina.
Also take in mind, that Lee allowed his cavalry to break out and they did.
@rebel2276 Im aware of what your myths are. Im also aware they are myths. No one wrote down the names of 26,000 Confederate soldier who surrendered, because most soldiers in the CSA deserted ALREADY. They weren't there. They were on the way home, walking. They had deserted insane Lee.
You said there is a list of these names -- taken by Union Troops. Okay show me the list. I could be wrong.
@LiarBoortz After several meetings between Lee and Grant the following terms were agreed upon and written down: Rolls of all officers and men to be made in duplicate. One copy to be given to both armies. Each company or regimental commander is to sign a like parole for the men of their commands.
By the end of April 12, 1865 some 26,018 Confederate soldiers surrendered themselves and their arms.
Rebel where is a copy of these 26,000 men's names ? Who wrote them down?
Id like to see these names. I doubt very much you can produce a list of names -- written at the time -- by Union officers, of Southern soldiers who were surrendered and present by the end of the war. You say there was this big duplicate list -- well, surely that hisitoric document would have been kept? Where is it? Where are the 26,000 names?
@rebel2276 funny-- where are the list you said were made? With 26,000 names? I would like to see those list. You said they were made -- oaky, fine. I could be wrong about number of troops there. Since you said there is an actual list -- made BY the North, listing the SOUTH's troops, by name -- show me the list.
rebel - furthermore -- JOhnston and Beauregard met personally with Davis not long after this - and told him, like a dutch uncle (They both detested Davis) and told him that virtually all the soldiers had deserted -- and took the horses. Those who did not physically leave, were refusing to obey orders. IT was a complete break down of the Army. That's why the war ended/
@LiarBoortz I went over this with you several months ago. Johnston surrendered the Army of Tennessee and all remaining Confederate forces still active in North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida. It was the largest surrender of the war, totaling 89,270 soldiers.
Rebel - yeah here is a question. Why did Southern writers AT THE TIME say virtually all the soldiers had deserted? Why did Jeff Davis say it? Why did Johnston and Beauregard say it, according to Southern writers?
But if you have some verification of 89,000 troops actually being there, or even 26,000-- lets see it. Come on - YOU said there is a list- so YOU can show it, right?
Ask yourself why more Union soldiers deserted during the war and they were never losing the war. I could understand if General Lee and the ANV was in Vermont or Maine and those New England soldiers had to get home and defend their house and family.
The reason many Confederates left, was because their families wrote them from Georgia, South Carolina and North Carolina. "Come home, we need you".
Rebel -- the massive desertions by Southern Cowards started long before Sherman went near Georgia idiot. The massive southern desertions came ON YOUR OWN GROUND as early as 62. You fucks couldn't keep men there -- they kept deserting. WHy? Because THEY DIDNT FUCKING support the Confederacy. The truth is, many Southerners either hated the slave owning rich fucks-- or wouldnt support them. THATS why you always had such massive desertions of Confederates, and why you lsot
@Taxfools More Union soldiers deserted during the war then Confederate soldiers did. You know its true, you yourself even typed it.
So tell me what was the excuse on why more Union soldiers deserted? Well one big factor was the reading of the Emancipation Proclamation. Many loyal Kentucky officers and enlisted owned slaves themselves and many deserted in great masses. Iowa, Illinois, New York, Pennsylvnia, troops from all Union states deserted.
Rebel nonsense. Yes of course the people back home urged their boys to come home. No shit. The slaves had mostly left or refused to work -- fucking the South up the ass. No one was doing the fucking WORK. The peole back home sure werent going to let their sons die for scum sucking Lee, Davis ,and the other slave owners.
Rebel let me know when you find the report of Davis meeting with Johnston and Beauregard, and how they told him virtually every soldier had left, or those who remained refused to fight. Too bad internet has made facts you lunatics hid for 150 years come to light.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Growing old, waiting on that. I want a crack at dirty neo-rebs, before I'm too old, to fight. You idiots need to quit pleasuring yourselves with the past, and get this new CSA off the ground.
are you white or immigrant? you are speakind as a nazi! you are hating your own country; it is very poor to read such comments, for us who have been freed bu US soldiers during WWII!
LOL...Not that it matter I'm white. I'm also a proud descendant of Union veterans, with a family history that goes back to 1637, in North America.
"hating my country"...Are you insane?
The Confederacy was the nation trying to destroy the USA.
Robert E. Lee was the traitor who commanded their army of rebellion. If those people had won the war, there would have been no USA to free people like yourself, during WWII.
It was Confederate Southerners who chose a policy of hate, and attacked their neighbors, not Union states. Robert E. Lee refused because he was a moral coward.
Lee's younger brother, John Fitzgerald Lee, retained his position with the Union Army.
Lee's sister Anne Lee Marshall, disagreed with his decision, and her son fought for the Union.
Cousin Roger Jones also fought for the Union.
In fact 40% of Virginia's officers stayed with the Union Army.
sud dumb fuck -- because he had 200 slaves and was getting power, prestige, and pussy from slavery. Because he had been planning a military coup against the US for months to destroy the federal government, even though he remained in uniform.
sud -- Lee went with the South cause he had slaves. Because he fucked slaves. Because he got rich on slaves. Because he got power, pussy, and prestige for owning slaves.
Guys, stop having political debates, like seriously grow up. Just let us celebrate a good man's birthday, and show our pride. Why are Yankees looking up this video anyway...? Some people are so dumb.
MrDixieLove 1 month ago
Nice.
George Vreeland Hill
GeorgeVreelandHill 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Didn't see any black people in that parade. I wonder why."
Who cares. Their relevance doesn't determine right nor wrong.
Gbpfbftw 1 year ago
Didn't see any black people in that parade. I wonder why.
TheForwardGaze 1 year ago
I can't believe that Lee was that king of bad guy; I think it is so easy to accuse.
If you 'd tell me that Adolf Hitler was a pleasant person; I couldn't tell you if you are right or wrong because I was not there! but history proved us that he was clever and intelligent but also he was a real serial killer. Concerning Lee, give me a real document; I could take a position.
sudiste59 1 year ago
Lee not only whipped slaves -- he would pay extra money for specialist to come in and whip some slaves. Verfied reports show Lee would personallly supervise the whippings and scream at slave girls while she was tortured. Lee then had salt brine poured on her wounds. Her crime? She ran away. Lee paid six times the regular fee to catch her and whip her. And he screamed at her while she was being whipped.
PerpetualMotionTax 1 year ago
@PerpetualMotionTax I am sure that George Washington and Thomas Jefferson and many of our founding fathers whipped their slaves at one time or another.
Anything new other then the same boring shit?
rebel2276 1 year ago
Rebel -- Lee would scream at 14 year old girls as he had them tortured. Can you grasp the kind of fuck that would do that? He sure as fuck wasn't some honorable kind hearted guy who hated slavery. His whole plan to get rich was slavery -- all he had come from slaves, he even married an ugly fat woman cause she was going to inherit a big estate with 200 plus slaves.
He also regularly sold babies -- something many slavers refused to do. He did it frequently when he needed money
PerpetualMotionTax 1 year ago
Rebel -- sorry dumb ass -- read what people then, even slave owners, were saying what was happening. Slavery was turning the fucks like Lee into monsters. Most of the Southern leaders were sociopaths, lunatics. Washington, Jefferson and that generation were not sociopaths and lunatics. The evil and perversions and cruelty of fucks like Lee, Davis, Yancey grew expotentially.
CanteenKid 1 year ago
@PerpetualMotionTax Another screen name? LOL
Keep up on General Lee there, waste your life on that :D
rebel2276 1 year ago
pretty crowded event
CaymanS21 3 years ago
Scottish Southern Heritage! Im a descendant of one of those Scottish immigrants that cam to Appalachia and im damn proud! We Will Rise Again
crazycuntryboy2 3 years ago 4
great event!
ConfederateBrave 4 years ago 3
The South WILL rise again!
UlvYngling 4 years ago 8
This has been flagged as spam show
@UlvYngling god forbid you racist fuck
ReadMyCommentBitch 1 year ago
I fell like knocking those yanky citie soft boys out.The south will rise again its going to happen wether u like it are not.
sportyy17 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
STILL WAITING. Get on with it already. You CSA twats, are ALL mouth. First you were gonna whip the Yankees in 6 weeks. Then it was "One Reb can whip 10 Yankees". Then it was (and is) "We're gonna rise again".
WELL...145 years later...nuttin's happened.
Please bring it on, though. The legalized hunting of neo-reb terrrorists, would be quite sporting. I'd even treat myself to a new sniper rifle.
wolfencrow 4 years ago
What is so funny about "Wolfencrow" is he lives in SOUTH CAROLINA lol. Do you run your mouth around town or just have big balls hiding behind a computer? Since you dont like the South, move back up to Pennsyshitty where your from loser.
rebel2276 4 years ago 3
REbel dumb fuck -- your pussy armies spent most of the time running from Union soldiers, or deserting. Did you know over 2/3 of your soldiers deserted? Did you know that most Southerners did NOT support the COnfederacy? Did you know that the South was taken over from 1820, by Slave Power lunatics, like Lee, Davis, Yancey, and stopped free speech, press, and real elections?
PerpetualMotionTax 1 year ago
@PerpetualMotionTax LOL, another one of your stupid made up screen names? LOL!!!!
Two/Thirds of Confederates did not desert, how many times do I have to go over this with you? I realize your a bit slow and your IQ is well, way down there.
Yawn, anything new to make up and lie about?
rebel2276 1 year ago
Rebel you are right. 2/3 did not desert. Try OVER 3/4. IN fact, toward the end, Confederate Generals Beauregard and Johnston met with Davis to tell him ALL the soldiers that could desert -- did. Those who stayed refused to fight one more minute. Got that? That's from Southern accounts at the time. Plus Davis HIMSELF said 2/3 of the soldiers deserted, and was begging for them to come back. I will send you his speech.
LiarBoortz 1 year ago
@LiarBoortz If Lee had lost that many men from desertion then how did he still have 50,000 men when Petersburg fell? By April 7th, 1865, Lee lost half his army with the battles of Five Forks, Saylor's Creek and several more lesser known battles. Lee did surrender 26,000 men. A far cry from "2/3 or 3/4".
Davis writing that is different then actually knowing the facts. This is the part where your very lost, never trust any numbers during the Civil War. I don't believe any of the losses.
rebel2276 1 year ago
Lee didnt surrender 26,000 men retard. In fact, I bet he couldn't find 2,000. The army was melting away. Confederate generals Johnston AND Beauregard told Davis in APril of 65, that virtuallly ALL the soldiers had DESERTED -- and took the horses! Those that didn't run, simply refused to fight anymore. That's what YOUR OWN generals said - not me. Davis said 2//3 a year before that./
Taxfools 1 year ago
@Taxfools Lord, how many face screen names are you going to make up? lol
It's called history, Lee surrendered around 26,000 men. How we know that is because Union officers took the names of the Confederates to issue their paroles.
Pretty common sense.
rebel2276 1 year ago
Rebel -- I'd like to see those names. There were troops around -- but as Johnston and Beauregard told Davis -- most had run away, and those who stayed refused to fight.
I doubt very much the Union took down 26,000 names of Confederate soldiers as surrender. Most men had run off. Show me the list.
LiarBoortz 1 year ago
@LiarBoortz Go look it up, this is so simple. Everyone here reading this is going to agree with me that General Lee surrendered 26,000 men. Now several Infantry regiments and batteries took the wrong roads and actually ended up making it to General Johnston's army in North Carolina.
Also take in mind, that Lee allowed his cavalry to break out and they did.
rebel2276 1 year ago
@rebel2276 Im aware of what your myths are. Im also aware they are myths. No one wrote down the names of 26,000 Confederate soldier who surrendered, because most soldiers in the CSA deserted ALREADY. They weren't there. They were on the way home, walking. They had deserted insane Lee.
You said there is a list of these names -- taken by Union Troops. Okay show me the list. I could be wrong.
LiarBoortz 1 year ago
@LiarBoortz After several meetings between Lee and Grant the following terms were agreed upon and written down: Rolls of all officers and men to be made in duplicate. One copy to be given to both armies. Each company or regimental commander is to sign a like parole for the men of their commands.
By the end of April 12, 1865 some 26,018 Confederate soldiers surrendered themselves and their arms.
Anymore questions, Mark?
rebel2276 1 year ago
Rebel where is a copy of these 26,000 men's names ? Who wrote them down?
Id like to see these names. I doubt very much you can produce a list of names -- written at the time -- by Union officers, of Southern soldiers who were surrendered and present by the end of the war. You say there was this big duplicate list -- well, surely that hisitoric document would have been kept? Where is it? Where are the 26,000 names?
CanteenKid 1 year ago
@rebel2276 funny-- where are the list you said were made? With 26,000 names? I would like to see those list. You said they were made -- oaky, fine. I could be wrong about number of troops there. Since you said there is an actual list -- made BY the North, listing the SOUTH's troops, by name -- show me the list.
LiarBoortz 1 year ago
rebel - furthermore -- JOhnston and Beauregard met personally with Davis not long after this - and told him, like a dutch uncle (They both detested Davis) and told him that virtually all the soldiers had deserted -- and took the horses. Those who did not physically leave, were refusing to obey orders. IT was a complete break down of the Army. That's why the war ended/
LiarBoortz 1 year ago
@LiarBoortz I went over this with you several months ago. Johnston surrendered the Army of Tennessee and all remaining Confederate forces still active in North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida. It was the largest surrender of the war, totaling 89,270 soldiers.
Anymore questions?
rebel2276 1 year ago
Rebel - yeah here is a question. Why did Southern writers AT THE TIME say virtually all the soldiers had deserted? Why did Jeff Davis say it? Why did Johnston and Beauregard say it, according to Southern writers?
But if you have some verification of 89,000 troops actually being there, or even 26,000-- lets see it. Come on - YOU said there is a list- so YOU can show it, right?
LiarBoortz 1 year ago
@LiarBoortz Another fake screen name, lol
Ask yourself why more Union soldiers deserted during the war and they were never losing the war. I could understand if General Lee and the ANV was in Vermont or Maine and those New England soldiers had to get home and defend their house and family.
The reason many Confederates left, was because their families wrote them from Georgia, South Carolina and North Carolina. "Come home, we need you".
rebel2276 1 year ago
Rebel -- the massive desertions by Southern Cowards started long before Sherman went near Georgia idiot. The massive southern desertions came ON YOUR OWN GROUND as early as 62. You fucks couldn't keep men there -- they kept deserting. WHy? Because THEY DIDNT FUCKING support the Confederacy. The truth is, many Southerners either hated the slave owning rich fucks-- or wouldnt support them. THATS why you always had such massive desertions of Confederates, and why you lsot
Taxfools 1 year ago
@Taxfools More Union soldiers deserted during the war then Confederate soldiers did. You know its true, you yourself even typed it.
So tell me what was the excuse on why more Union soldiers deserted? Well one big factor was the reading of the Emancipation Proclamation. Many loyal Kentucky officers and enlisted owned slaves themselves and many deserted in great masses. Iowa, Illinois, New York, Pennsylvnia, troops from all Union states deserted.
rebel2276 1 year ago
Rebel nonsense. Yes of course the people back home urged their boys to come home. No shit. The slaves had mostly left or refused to work -- fucking the South up the ass. No one was doing the fucking WORK. The peole back home sure werent going to let their sons die for scum sucking Lee, Davis ,and the other slave owners.
LiarBoortz 1 year ago
@LiarBoortz Nonsense? Let me know when you put in Ten years of research at the Library of Congress and National Archives.
rebel2276 1 year ago
Rebel let me know when you find the report of Davis meeting with Johnston and Beauregard, and how they told him virtually every soldier had left, or those who remained refused to fight. Too bad internet has made facts you lunatics hid for 150 years come to light.
CanteenKid 1 year ago
Fuck all u fags that disrespect the greatest general in north american history.General Lee is the best and always will so shut up will u.
sportyy17 4 years ago 4
SOUTH WILL RISE AGAIN
allenb2323 4 years ago 2
South will never rise again...we are to intelligent for that
Monroedean24 4 years ago
no where just better.....
Monroedean24 4 years ago
south will rise again!
JohnnyRebelKKK 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Growing old, waiting on that. I want a crack at dirty neo-rebs, before I'm too old, to fight. You idiots need to quit pleasuring yourselves with the past, and get this new CSA off the ground.
wolfencrow 4 years ago
are you white or immigrant? you are speakind as a nazi! you are hating your own country; it is very poor to read such comments, for us who have been freed bu US soldiers during WWII!
sudiste59 3 years ago
LOL...Not that it matter I'm white. I'm also a proud descendant of Union veterans, with a family history that goes back to 1637, in North America.
"hating my country"...Are you insane?
The Confederacy was the nation trying to destroy the USA.
Robert E. Lee was the traitor who commanded their army of rebellion. If those people had won the war, there would have been no USA to free people like yourself, during WWII.
wolfencrow 2 years ago
Racist? In his day he was a progressive
hd95 4 years ago
why celebrate a racist loser...the north won...its over.. we don't talk about the civil war..... robert e lee is a joke
Monroedean24 4 years ago
You must talk about it--you posted here. The North was and is still full of hypocrites.
3rdconfederate 4 years ago
Well, aren't you just class. Your mother teach you those manners?
carton253 4 years ago
ROBERT E. LEE was a great american
dwhite1220 4 years ago 3
President Lincoln offerd Lee command of the Yankee army before the war
dwhite1220 4 years ago 2
right for the people who hate the South, you could explain them WHY General Lee refused and fought with the South Nation!
I support Dixie!
sudiste59 3 years ago 7
It was Confederate Southerners who chose a policy of hate, and attacked their neighbors, not Union states. Robert E. Lee refused because he was a moral coward.
Lee's younger brother, John Fitzgerald Lee, retained his position with the Union Army.
Lee's sister Anne Lee Marshall, disagreed with his decision, and her son fought for the Union.
Cousin Roger Jones also fought for the Union.
In fact 40% of Virginia's officers stayed with the Union Army.
Please stop drinking Confederate Kool Aid.
wolfencrow 2 years ago
sud dumb fuck -- because he had 200 slaves and was getting power, prestige, and pussy from slavery. Because he had been planning a military coup against the US for months to destroy the federal government, even though he remained in uniform.
CanteenKid 1 year ago
sud -- Lee went with the South cause he had slaves. Because he fucked slaves. Because he got rich on slaves. Because he got power, pussy, and prestige for owning slaves.
LiarBoortz 1 year ago