Haven't yu notice people that the video is chopped off? His maks it look as if continuous motion is there...Again he hasn't overcome magnetic lock up...
on the last comment, its not the magnets producing the power, its the circular motion that produces energy that is transfered to a coil and stored in a "battery"/conductor if you will
you know these same quacks that scoff that use accademic diatribe and newtons laws to stop all thought are the same quacks at berkley and mit who scoffed at fleshman and ponds and cold fusion
the laugh is on them now the dod is funding cold fusion with tritium and quaterium
(i suspect penterium also) as a neutron emitter for enrichment
now yes this is a magnet motor, but all motors are magnet motors. as they use electromagnets to run. and so does this one. its nothing more then a single coil pulse motors, with a extra magnets added, and you would think that it would mean that it would mean more bang for the buck. but it needs that much more power in the coil to "break the gate" so really just a normal pulse motor would work better, and like all pulse motor they dont have any uses other then for a science fair.
This is just what it says it is, a magnet motor. It takes electric energy in and produces movement. Big deal and not even efficiently done. A bicycle electric motor kit would be more efficient then this design. Now, attach a generator to the center hub and make it go at the same speed or faster when it is unplugged and completely isolated from any other input of energy and I will be greatly impressed. (that means never will be)
@AngryVGFur That big black object with two wires coming off it...is a POWERED coil magnet...used to break the lock-up at just the right time. I want to see more mechanical spring motors made...so disappointing all these magnet motors. :)
while trying to invent, most of us will look stupid when we fail, some of us will look smart when we succeed , but mankind will always benefit on both our failure's and successes
this is not an infinite source of energy just incase some one wonders . if it took 1 lb to push the magnet and it was spinning it would eventualy stop from air resistance and gravity. because from the time the spinning started and stoped the gravity and or air resistance would of equaled 1 lb of resistance stoping the magnet with equal power that you took to spin the magnet motor.
@TheSovietBears magnetism is a stronger force than gravity, high school physics. Building any device inside a vacuum is not hard. So why try to stifle progress? It takes an unconventional approach in order to make a breakthrough... otherwise all you get is more of the same. Do you still believe the world is flat?
@aaron490 well this is not in a vacuum watch more closely and dont jump to conclusions besides im not going to spend any more time on somer one who doesnt know anything themselves about physics.
"Energy cannot be created or destroyed" -- Albert Einstien
Go back to physics class and dont accuse people smarter then you of stifling progress because your just a dumb person who likes to question those who know what their saying . so dont comment until you know what your commenting about.
is there a way reduce the requirements of all our daily devices to such low amounts that even minimal amounts of energy generation could power our daily needs
I mean it has to have a counterforce not only bi the friction also for the "final" magnet, the nearest one I mean, any way its a great idea to improve the efficiency of a motor, to bad for people with peacemakers...
the amount of power that would produce, if attached to a turbine would not be able to power that little electro-magnet sitting next to the gate, i think?
this motor can be made to run on an external rotation energy storage .aka .i throw you a non spinning wheel and you can stop it when it gets there but if i spin it up and then send it your way it its harder to stop it . thanks casper
the black cylinder ater the end of magnets is a timer that uses timing to turn on a wagnet to move it. buuuut it still doesnt explain the movement unless a moter iss hidden LIKE RIGHT ABOVE THE AXIS.
The changing magnetic fields produce energy that CAN be measured and used.
Take a spool...get some copper wire.....make a coil......pass a magnet in and out of it and you can power an LED or read the power fluctuations on a voltmeter.
You should know what you're talking about before you open your mouth lol
The changing magnetic fields produce energy that CAN be measured and used.
Take a spool...get some copper wire.....make a coil......pass a magnet in and out of it and you can power an LED or read the power fluctuations on a voltmeter.
You should know what you're talking about before you open your mouth lol
There was a time when the most intelligent minds on the planet believed that the world was flat and that Earth was the center of the universe! The so-called "laws" of physics were not always "laws". It is only through experimentation that any invention that seems to have been around "forever" exists at all!
I like to say: Limits are there to push, Laws are there to bend, and rules-they're meant for breaking. This includes the laws of physics. We made them up, we can make them down agian.
Actually the laws a physics weren't so much "made up" as they were DISCOVERED. The first law of thermodynamics has been around for 150 years, and never been disproved. I have seen many claims by inventors that they have achieved that age old dream of Free Energy produced from nothing, but they all fade away as the light is shined on their silly gadgets. I have to ask: Where's the Data?
Most of these experiments are being done by citizens at their own expense. Kudos to every single one of them, because mainstream "energy research" is only being funded by energy companies and through taxes controlled by politicians connected to energy companies, and this line of thinking is against their best interests. We might be wrong, it might no be possible, but if we are right we'll find it without billions in tax dollars being wasted, unlike the failed corporate experiments with nuclear.
Cell phones airplanes, etc all respect the laws of physics, perpetuum motion does not. @jwklbm326 and since when is cold fusion and PM a fact?. IN the universe "nothing is lost all is transformed".... So NO free energy (maybe extremely cheap, someday) ever!
Over unity, perpetual motion and cold fusion have been produced and are facts. But they cannot be explained by the current laws regarded by the institutions who guard technology with limiting laws. Go back 300 years and tell someone that you want to make a jet airplane or cell phone and you would have been branded a heretic and insane by the masses. But the bright few who could use their imagination and fluid intelligence would see beyond the noise of dissent. This is evolution.
@jwklbm326 Alright for you guy,ya damn right.I could'nt have said it better.I get so fed up with all the institutionalized intellectuals who've been taught how to think,and thus rendered inable to think or imagine beyond what they've been taught.and this is what we call getting a higher education.
The changing magnetic fields produce energy that CAN be measured and used.
Take a spool...get some copper wire.....make a coil......pass a magnet in and out of it and you can power an LED or read the power fluctuations on a voltmeter.
You should know what you're talking about before you open your mouth lol
The changing magnetic fields produce energy that CAN be measured and used.
Take a spool...get some copper wire.....make a coil......pass a magnet in and out of it and you can power an LED or read the power fluctuations on a voltmeter.
You should know what you're talking about before you open your mouth lol
@st0rmforce no one is suggesting that magnets produce power in and of themselves, but rather, that magnets are just a means of producing power in the same way that magnets inside a conventional generator produce electricity.
@NeilAnthony69 I meant that things like this are using attracting or repelling magnets to power it. The problem is that it is a one-way thing. Example:
Magnet A attracts the arm. As it gets near to it, its attracted to Magnet B. B then has to pull the arm away from A which would take the same amount of energy that was generated from A pulling the arm.
The way of getting around this is to put B closer to the arm. To get past the last magnet you need to pull with more energy than the magnet.
@st0rmforce fucking simple right people who think its possible to get free energy need to know any action will have an opposite equal reaction so its imposible to produce energy because theres no difference left from the action/reaction
But with the spinning itself, couldn't it be used as a catalyst to produce heat or power a machine that operates from being cranked? There has to be something useful that it can be used for.
@AllPro777 No. Perpetual motion machines simply don't exist, and so it'd use more energy than it generates, and so it would just be an eletronic motor.
@LeeviON There is no Perpetum Mobile - "scientists" say. Ok, what is Solar System ? ... hmm, well it receives energy from Galaxy. Ok, what is Galaxy... well it took energy from The Big Bang. Ok, what is Big Bang? well, we don't know yet. Ok, you don't know but you know that it is not Pepetum Mobile? Yes. hmmm.. something is wrong with "the science".
@hardyVeles Just because you don't know what it is doesn't make it a perpetum mobile. Think about it. Everything needs energy to move. And there is nothing that would have zero friction - so no matter what you use as an axel, it needs more energy to move than it creates moving. Energy can of course be produced by a very hard process from matter, but yet still, there is no infinite amount of matter, so it'd stop someday and so would your energy you need to spin the wheel.
the reason why people bicker on youtube when it comes to over-unity is because of the scarcity mindset and the current trend of dominating nature, animals, everything.
"if I can't get a free lunch, nobody can"
when people colaborate for positive change through fringe science, something happens and big progress is made. peace.
@hotfreshrider So true. I also believe its the thought process of the average college educated human that is afraid to let go of what they were taught to recite perhaps due to peers and money spent on education.
No. We just want verifiable, empirical proof. We aren't going to just go with something just because it seems like it is cool and "goes against the machine".
I need numbers. I need peer reviewed papers. I need this reproduced in a lab setting. I ned something more than a shady youtube video which not only looks fake, but could have an electric motor hidden in so many places.
@melancholyid The electric motor is in the middle of the picture. It's powered by the wires which are in platn view.Tha whole thing IS an electric motor.
@RADARULES No, that is the dumbest one of all. Reality does not work that way, and the sooner you guys realise that, the sooner we can actually get to that post-scarcity society by doing real, productive science.
Here's a question: What do you call "fringe" science that has been proven right? Science.
@Magnetohydrodynamics Talk about dumb statements... here's a question for you...how can you say in one breath, that reality doesn't work that way... only then say in the next breath that fringe science proven correct becomes science? Doesn't the latter part of that statement alone give testimony to the fact that it does work that way? Without fringe science, profound scientific discoveries that forever change today's science would forever remain hidden. Science must push the envelope.
@hotfreshrider but this has nothing to do with science. it's just plain stupid building overunity machines. our physical models, which have been proven over and over again, simply say there's no such thing. learn to accept the reality and deal with it, rather than hunt after your stupid dreams.
@vstolyarov123 If it spins, it can create small amounts of energy, right? Just open up the top and put some coiled copper and whatever else you need... create the energy needed to spin it by it's very own spinning? xd
@shizengenshou This thing is connected to a battery and that's where it takes the energy to spin. This is a very efficient motor but it is not free energy.
it is like everybody seems to forget about ALL of teslas work .. inparticular the teslar tower and the free energy to be gotten any where from the plenet..... making generators is in that respect a waste till you've mastered building a dumb thing take the limitless energy thats already there!
I think something like this could run on its own if you had a wire rail that went around the circumference of the device at the same distance from center point as the magnet on the arm, then attach a piece of magnetic shielding on the arm and hang it from the wire, then bend the wire at the problematic point so the shielding comes down at the last magnet. This should work no matter which way the arm goes (based on pulling or pushing)
I invented a breakthrough energy source which violates the law of conservation of energy. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena which violate the law of energy conservation. I am looking for $30 000 for a prototype and $3M for patents. Making a 6 kW generator will cost $1200 in mass production, value of the energy produced per year $5400.
I invented a breakthrough energy source that violates the law of energy conservation. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena that violate the law of energy conservation. I am looking for $6M for a prototype and patents.
@Dimension13XYZZY You are just a hack dude get a life. You barley even know what we were talking about let alone understanding anything I posted. Way over you simple little mind. Go troll somewhere else.
@timrocket2008 "You can leave the armature alone and replace the PM(permanent magnets) with stronger magnets. Now you have a more powerful motor than before but using the same amount of energy. This is because the PM are performing part of the work out put."
No TimFuckingDumbassRocket, you are absolutely and totally fucking wrong. You clearly do not understand the very basics about how trivial technology like electric motors work.
@Dimension13XYZZY Oh yes I do! I have done this and know this to be a fact by my own experience not just what someone tells me which is how you think you "know things"
@timrocket2008 Exactly *what* have you done, Tim? And exactly *what* do you think you understand from it? You obviously lack knowledge about basic physics. Do you even understand what happens and why? Or are you just guessing?
You know, this is pretty basic stuff for most people. It is very easy to calculate and it is easily empirically verifiable.
How is it that you dont understand things like this? Did you skip school? How old are you?
@Dimension13XYZZY If you can't explain it, it doesn't exist. The laws of thermodynamics seem to be getting stretched a lot, lately... methinks they may be more like guidelines =P.
@Dimension13XYZZY Well he does believe gravity is stronger than electromagnetism, which explains a lot. Im guessing that basic knowledge must have a pre-requisite of Science for pepul hoo kaint spel syance. Then you get to touch electric motors, and actually learn about the 4 forces.
@painxtreme Ever go to a junk yard? They have cranes with a big Electro magnet that lifts up cars when turned On and when turned Off, the car drops like a bad habit.
@timrocket2008 because electromagnetism is stronger than gravity, while the electromagnetism is in effect, it wins, shut it off, gravity goes back to work. Gravity is very powerful once in the realm of huge, space bending objects like planets and stars, but...one last example 2 people 10 ft apart, both weighing 200lbs. They do exert gravity on each other, but not enough to detect. Now put 2-200lb magnets 10 ft apart. I'll rest my case, if that doesn't splain it for ya, nothings gonna.
What is this obsession with magnets being a form of "anti-gravity" By that logic my table has "Anti-Gravity" properties as it stops my plates tumbling to the earth.
@MarshyMarshMan Your table is a structure ultimately connected to the ground as it uses gravity to keep your dinner plate on your table. So my understanding is that is Gravity. Not anti-gravity.
luisdanielmesa might be right. I am not sure I understand fully.
lol another looney... gravitation cannot be eliminated, hence UNIVERSAL law of gravitation, the only way for an object not to be ruled by such law is the be either too far from all the rest of the objects in the universe or to have NO MASS at all, and i don't mean a negligible mass i mean no mass. "magnets are gravity and antigravity" LOL. Bodies with mass are gravity, and there's nothing contrary to gravity.
you could counter gravity... it's the use of the term "antigravity" that i laugh at... antigravity can be accomplished in 2 ways: 1) having a squared distance to be negative, which is impossible since in real numbers all squares are positive) or 2) having a negative mass which my imagination cannot yet conceive... so the term antigravity is useless since it's something that cannot exist. I'm not saying you cannot create a force opposite to gravity to counter it and escape (like rockets do)
i like gravity? it doesn't matter if i "like"(?) it or not... it's what we have. Antigravity is impossible and nonsense... so implying something IS antigravity (magnets or anything else) is simply nonsense.
@luisdanielmesa I guess you never heard of a gyroscope which is semi anti gravity but to a knucklehead like you, thats simply nonsense also and they do not exist.
LOL... there's enogh info on wikipedia for you... and i dare you to find the term "antigravity"... see ya... thanks for making me laugh... lol... gyroscope antigravity... you are an example of some education system not doing its job...
@timrocket2008 the diff between anti and semi anti is zero... in the sense that there's neither of them, they don't exist... i give you a start, and at least point out a source of information (good or bad is for others to decide) where's your source that claims the diff between semi and anti? LOL. ONE source is better than NONE. I don't have to prove antigravity doesn't exist, science works the other way around, prove it exists and you'll be ahead, otherwise you're still at the bottom =) cheers
@timrocket2008 i think the problem here is about concepts, so you're saying that anything that levitates is antigravity? i disagree, the universal law of gravity states that 2 bodies attract each other, BUT are subject to other forces as well, therefore, any other force that acts opposite direction of that attraction and to the line joining the centermass of any 2 bodies is antigravity? so if i lift a grocery bag, if i pilot a helicopter, etc is that antigravity? a gyroscope is not antigravity.
@luisdanielmesa I have to give you a source idiot? You never heard of a gyroscope.
LOL, yes you need to give me a source, otherwise you don't have a valid point, it's a fallacy. I can say "oompaloompas exist" but i can't say " everyone knows they exist, are you an idiot?" just to explain it... so, sources instead of looney talk please.
@timrocket2008 gyroscopes operate on the concept of precesion. How this works is to do with angular momentum and torque applied to rotating object by gravity, it has absolutly nothing to do with anti-gravity, and i would be happy to explain to you how it works if i could be bothered travelling to where you live
@timrocket2008 scientifically? or in laymens terms? if by anti gravity you mean some force opposing and sucesfully beating gravity, then yes this is anti gravity, as would be lifting a rock off the ground
@mica410 counter gravity vs. anti gravity. Lifting a rock off of the ground is not anti gravity. If you hold it level, you are utilizing Earth's gravity to stay in your hand.
@timrocket2008 Thats why gravity is the weakest of the 4 known forces. A refrigerator magnet is stronger than gravity. Gravity only becomes powerful with extraordinary size involved. Most things do not bend space that much until you reach planetary mass.
@painxtreme You think a refrigerator magnet is stronger than earth's gravity?
Hold the magnet 12 inches from the refrigerator and 24 inches from the floor. If the magnet were stronger than Earth' gravity, it would hit the refrigerator but it will just hit the floor. So you are 150% wrong.
@PropagatedFreedom but doesn't a refrigerator have gravity? if the Earth were the same size it would be weaker. I think the smaller the Earth or any mass is weaker the smaller it is.
Its one of those old theories from Einstein. Its not a fact though.
@timrocket2008 possibly, but i believe that mass does not posses gravity until a certain point, and once large enough some where in the core mass converts into energy that serves as the attractive force (gravity)
@PropagatedFreedom Core; Kinda like the Nucleolus in a magnet? They say the Earth is a giant magnet so would a fridge magnet levitate on the north pole if you face the North pole of the magnet down and will it be heavier if you face the south down if standing on the North Pole?
@timrocket2008 no... more like how the sun radiates energy in all detections from all points of the core and then from all points of the surface, i think gravity is a attractive form of radiation... but i don't know.. that's just my speculation
@timrocket2008 Im not going to waste any further time with this after this statement. Gravity becomes powerful only with great mass. Let's look at your experiment this way. Put a paperclip on the table. Hold a magnet above it. Voilå magnetism defeats gravity. Were gravity stronger than magnetism, the paperclip would stay put, no?
Talking about gravity between small objects is a mug's game. My gravitational pull on my wife hasn't gotten a beer down here.
@timrocket2008 wikipedia, for the most part, is contributed to by scientists and university residents. If you think information on there is suspect, check the sources, they are all listed at the bottom of the page
@mica410 Wrong! the last time I checked anyone online can input their own to all information.
You dont have to be a Scientist or a University resident to post information on Wkipedia. I am surprised that you didn't realize that. I guess you are just dim witted a bit.
@timrocket2008 yes anyone can write stuff on wikipedia, but it gets monitored, records are kept of who changed what, and errors are normally correced quickly. Yes people can fud stuff up, thats why you check the sources
and i didnt say people couldnt post stuff, i just said that most of the articles are written by scientists.
@mica410 Well I find too many flaws in information on Wikipedia in which I am sure of so when it comes to researching things I don't know about, I steer clear away from Wikipedia because of it's often miss informative nature.
@timrocket2008 fair enough, you should never take things at face value, i would never use wikipedia as a source for papers, but it is a good guide and can lead you to other sources
Anti-gravity: err... the opposite of gravity. LOL.
You cannot ESCAPE gravity, it's impossible, you can reduce it's INFLUENCE (defy it). Newton deducted the simple form and Einstein gave another insight.
"masses distort spacetime in their vicinity, and other particles move in trajectories determined by the geometry of spacetime".
@timrocket2008 How can they be breaking the laws of physics if i'm precisely explaining you that you can never escape them (by difinition they are "laws", they apply at all times)?
·Earth's gravity -> can be (almost) escaped.
Universal Law of Graivtation -> cannot be escaped.
A rough example is when a ball rests on a cloth which is tied on the corners, and you put another smaller ball near the edge, it will roll inside. The cloth acts as spacetime and the smaller balls moves in a path towards the bigger ball. If iinstead of putting the small one, you make it roll in another direction, then it will "orbit" towards the bigger one.
@timrocket2008 "@luisdanielmesa Dude what you are saying makes no sense. I guess your vocabulary is better than mine. Please explain since so far you make zero sense." - I guess you have to grow a brain before you try to understand him, Tim. He is explaining it in simple words, like you talk to small kids, and you think it's too hard to understand? Are you smarter than a 5th grader? Umm i'm starting to think you have few years left until fifth grade... or are you just trolling us??
@luisdanielmesa saying that gravity can not be eliminated was actually my original point and it has nothing to do with any anti gravity effect of an Earth magnet.
Not to mention the 78% efficiency again but a Gas engine is only 38% efficient because it does not harness the free energy of Permanent Magnets like Electric motors do.
Your math is wrong. Say you have a small electric motor and controller with an Input Power of 24 volts @ 41.67amps which is about 1000watts or 1KW. Now with a 78% motor efficiency, thats about 780Watts or about 1.04 Horsepower.
The permanent Magnets are delivering a minimum of 1/2 HP. So to say or think that Magnets can not perform work in an equation is a misconception because in reality, they do perform co-work.
@timrocket2008 "... 24 volts @ 41.67amps which is about 1000watts or 1KW. Now with a 78% motor efficiency, thats about 780Watts or about 1.04 Horsepower. The permanent Magnets are delivering a minimum of 1/2 HP"
Oh really? So you can hook up your magical electric motor to a generator, to another motor, to a generator... (well you get the point) and for each generator you get a power increase of about 50%? Input 1000W and get 1500W which becomes 2250W, 2275W, 5062W, and so on?
@Dimension13XYZZY No because,for one there is a 22% loss at the motor shaft then you have more loss in drive line components and the resistance in coils of the motor used as a generator. By the time you calculate it all out you are probably down to 30% efficiency or 70% loss. What you fail to understand is that you can not get more output than input even if Earth magnets make a motor 50% more efficient (in which they do) there is still a loss in the resistance of the coils. It can never be100%E
@Dimension13XYZZY That 1/2hp that the permanent magnets are delivering is correct in actuality. If you were to replace those permanent magnets with coil magnets, you would then need MORE input to have the SAME output as using the Magnets.
So theoretically if you used ALL permanent Magnets, there would be no need for electrical input (loss). It will never work because permanent magnets have only 2 poles. you would need 3 poles for it to work which is also theoretical. A coil magnet can T On/off
@timrocket2008: I don't think you understand the difference between antigravity and levitation. Antigravity is something that makes gravity irrelevant or inactive. if you put a piece of plastic on top of a magnet it will fall. therefore it's is NOT antigravity. one magnet floating on top of another is magnetic levitation.
if i can suspend a magnet in mid-air, only from the forces of another magnet, and it will stay in the air indefinitely, then by all logical standards how can this NOT be an example of antigravity? a magnet is ALWAYS "working". when its pushing and pulling its working. even when an object is stuck to the magnet, its still working.. magnetism in itself is PERPETUAL MOTION, therefore in the very least, requiring a little more attention from today's minds other than complete doubts and skepticism!
No, magnetism is not antigravity! if you hang an object on the celling with a rope and it doesn't fall, it's not antigravity, same thing happens with the magnet. Magnetism isn't perpetual motion, simply because there is no motion.
Also we have no doubt about magnetism, without it we wouldn't have any energy on the planet.
Perpetual motion by definition is 100% energy efficient. Magnetism cannot be 100% efficient because when you generate current there is a back emf i.e: magnetic friction.
@0oPrincesseSissi and free energy must be 101% efficient or more, otherwise once you include the friction element connected the PPM to a turbine of sorts, the machine will lose energy and stop
You are confused with motor efficiency and thinking Free Energy means creating energy. Only "creating energy" would be breaking laws of physics/not possible.You don't understand what you are actually talking about.
i get what you're saying. the same thing we have all been taught in school and from everyone else who claims to "know" the facts. but let me also inform you that the term "perpetual motion" in itself can never be based upon any facts because we as human beings have NO possible way of comprehending any absolute measure of "motion" or "rest". from our understanding we can assume we are in motion more than at rest simply from relative perspectives. thus, EXISTENCE is perpetual is it not?
@0oPrincesseSissi Your rope analogy is stupid because the object is connected to the ground by structure so thats not an example of anti gravity as a magnet is. A magnet is gravity and anti gravity.
Perpetum mobile, anyone?
Evangeder 2 months ago
Haven't yu notice people that the video is chopped off? His maks it look as if continuous motion is there...Again he hasn't overcome magnetic lock up...
kukulcangod1 3 months ago
what are you using to power this? I know it's not running by itself.
sbeer6er 3 months ago
on the last comment, its not the magnets producing the power, its the circular motion that produces energy that is transfered to a coil and stored in a "battery"/conductor if you will
Neilio725 4 months ago
you need to use gravity with magnets and it would work and maybe some bungee cord thats some heavy potential there
hideHYDEimcoming 4 months ago
you know these same quacks that scoff that use accademic diatribe and newtons laws to stop all thought are the same quacks at berkley and mit who scoffed at fleshman and ponds and cold fusion
the laugh is on them now the dod is funding cold fusion with tritium and quaterium
(i suspect penterium also) as a neutron emitter for enrichment
badboybilzer 4 months ago
now yes this is a magnet motor, but all motors are magnet motors. as they use electromagnets to run. and so does this one. its nothing more then a single coil pulse motors, with a extra magnets added, and you would think that it would mean that it would mean more bang for the buck. but it needs that much more power in the coil to "break the gate" so really just a normal pulse motor would work better, and like all pulse motor they dont have any uses other then for a science fair.
1crazyfocker 5 months ago
AntyNWO.pl
katowicecentrum 6 months ago
___ w w w diymagneticmotor com for FREE energy|~
msformulax3 7 months ago
This is just what it says it is, a magnet motor. It takes electric energy in and produces movement. Big deal and not even efficiently done. A bicycle electric motor kit would be more efficient then this design. Now, attach a generator to the center hub and make it go at the same speed or faster when it is unplugged and completely isolated from any other input of energy and I will be greatly impressed. (that means never will be)
Slidaulth 8 months ago
Magnets are just like springs ....spring coefficients (Kc). How come people don't make spring motors?...why all the magnet motors?
AccuracyMarked 8 months ago
it's not perpetual motion, it stops rotating at 0:26 !
AngryVGFur 8 months ago
@AngryVGFur That big black object with two wires coming off it...is a POWERED coil magnet...used to break the lock-up at just the right time. I want to see more mechanical spring motors made...so disappointing all these magnet motors. :)
AccuracyMarked 8 months ago
@AngryVGFur LOL!!!
SPLATYURFAICEINlol 7 months ago
while trying to invent, most of us will look stupid when we fail, some of us will look smart when we succeed , but mankind will always benefit on both our failure's and successes
eudaemonian 9 months ago 2
this is like direct drive in washing machine !!!!
JIMDP25 9 months ago
this is not an infinite source of energy just incase some one wonders . if it took 1 lb to push the magnet and it was spinning it would eventualy stop from air resistance and gravity. because from the time the spinning started and stoped the gravity and or air resistance would of equaled 1 lb of resistance stoping the magnet with equal power that you took to spin the magnet motor.
TheSovietBears 9 months ago
@TheSovietBears magnetism is a stronger force than gravity, high school physics. Building any device inside a vacuum is not hard. So why try to stifle progress? It takes an unconventional approach in order to make a breakthrough... otherwise all you get is more of the same. Do you still believe the world is flat?
aaron490 8 months ago
@aaron490 well this is not in a vacuum watch more closely and dont jump to conclusions besides im not going to spend any more time on somer one who doesnt know anything themselves about physics.
"Energy cannot be created or destroyed" -- Albert Einstien
Go back to physics class and dont accuse people smarter then you of stifling progress because your just a dumb person who likes to question those who know what their saying . so dont comment until you know what your commenting about.
TheSovietBears 8 months ago
if it really works put a generator on and save money.
everybody talks about how great something works...why dont they use it?
lostbuffalo 9 months ago
Behoorlijk mooi ding hoor. Wat is de input, en wat is de output? (in energie..)
Super!
StickerMedia 11 months ago
Why was there a cord coming out of it?
thefullmonte03 11 months ago
@thefullmonte03 the wire is the perpetual source of electricity.( from the power station).
winterka100 10 months ago
is there a way reduce the requirements of all our daily devices to such low amounts that even minimal amounts of energy generation could power our daily needs
vajrapapp 11 months ago
The state of our kitchen when my wife has been at her mother's for a week proves that this machine could never truly work.
MrUnluckythirteen 1 year ago 2
@MrUnluckythirteen
nice explanation of entropy! :)
sartoc 1 year ago
How many time does it leasts rotating?
I mean it has to have a counterforce not only bi the friction also for the "final" magnet, the nearest one I mean, any way its a great idea to improve the efficiency of a motor, to bad for people with peacemakers...
Selur91 1 year ago
the amount of power that would produce, if attached to a turbine would not be able to power that little electro-magnet sitting next to the gate, i think?
tundraman217 1 year ago
Can this generate more energy than that he spent to rotate?
geekionizado 1 year ago
just remember when they all thought the earth was flat!
sickasso72 1 year ago
Well, this video clears everything up for me.
tasteslikechimp 1 year ago
is that getting faster or I'm just crazy
LukaPoljak 1 year ago
this motor can be made to run on an external rotation energy storage .aka .i throw you a non spinning wheel and you can stop it when it gets there but if i spin it up and then send it your way it its harder to stop it . thanks casper
theonethatgoofs 1 year ago
sorry about my spelling
Novocaine77 1 year ago
fake.
the black cylinder ater the end of magnets is a timer that uses timing to turn on a wagnet to move it. buuuut it still doesnt explain the movement unless a moter iss hidden LIKE RIGHT ABOVE THE AXIS.
Novocaine77 1 year ago
PERPETUAL MOTION DOESN'T EXIST.
BEING OPTIMISTIC EQUALS LYING
PERPETUAL MOTION DOESN'T EXIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
williboooooy 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@st0rmforce
wrong lol
The changing magnetic fields produce energy that CAN be measured and used.
Take a spool...get some copper wire.....make a coil......pass a magnet in and out of it and you can power an LED or read the power fluctuations on a voltmeter.
You should know what you're talking about before you open your mouth lol
this is 9th grade science haha
chuckcxr 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@st0rmforce
wrong lol
The changing magnetic fields produce energy that CAN be measured and used.
Take a spool...get some copper wire.....make a coil......pass a magnet in and out of it and you can power an LED or read the power fluctuations on a voltmeter.
You should know what you're talking about before you open your mouth lol
this is 9th grade science haha
chuckcxr 1 year ago
There was a time when the most intelligent minds on the planet believed that the world was flat and that Earth was the center of the universe! The so-called "laws" of physics were not always "laws". It is only through experimentation that any invention that seems to have been around "forever" exists at all!
online247365 1 year ago
I like to say: Limits are there to push, Laws are there to bend, and rules-they're meant for breaking. This includes the laws of physics. We made them up, we can make them down agian.
:)
cuthbertnibbles 1 year ago
@cuthbertnibbles
Actually the laws a physics weren't so much "made up" as they were DISCOVERED. The first law of thermodynamics has been around for 150 years, and never been disproved. I have seen many claims by inventors that they have achieved that age old dream of Free Energy produced from nothing, but they all fade away as the light is shined on their silly gadgets. I have to ask: Where's the Data?
JeffMountainPicker 1 year ago
Most of these experiments are being done by citizens at their own expense. Kudos to every single one of them, because mainstream "energy research" is only being funded by energy companies and through taxes controlled by politicians connected to energy companies, and this line of thinking is against their best interests. We might be wrong, it might no be possible, but if we are right we'll find it without billions in tax dollars being wasted, unlike the failed corporate experiments with nuclear.
Joybuzzard 1 year ago
You can see the two wires...obviously connected to a power source.
ijatherealnickman 1 year ago
Cell phones airplanes, etc all respect the laws of physics, perpetuum motion does not. @jwklbm326 and since when is cold fusion and PM a fact?. IN the universe "nothing is lost all is transformed".... So NO free energy (maybe extremely cheap, someday) ever!
johnymetalman2002 1 year ago
Screw the naysayers go for it,you might just pull it off.I hope ya get it right,if not failure by attempt beats failing to attempt anyday.
toobigaman 1 year ago
Over unity, perpetual motion and cold fusion have been produced and are facts. But they cannot be explained by the current laws regarded by the institutions who guard technology with limiting laws. Go back 300 years and tell someone that you want to make a jet airplane or cell phone and you would have been branded a heretic and insane by the masses. But the bright few who could use their imagination and fluid intelligence would see beyond the noise of dissent. This is evolution.
jwklbm326 1 year ago
@jwklbm326 Alright for you guy,ya damn right.I could'nt have said it better.I get so fed up with all the institutionalized intellectuals who've been taught how to think,and thus rendered inable to think or imagine beyond what they've been taught.and this is what we call getting a higher education.
toobigaman 1 year ago
Some Japanese kid will discover perpetual motion.
planetdan22 1 year ago
I wonder how long it will take before people realise that overunity doesn't work.
Magnets don't produce power.
If two magnets pull each other together, they will need the same amount of energy to pull them apart.
st0rmforce 1 year ago 42
@st0rmforce but you can float with them :)
smashking2006 1 year ago
Comment removed
chuckcxr 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@st0rmforce
wrong lol
The changing magnetic fields produce energy that CAN be measured and used.
Take a spool...get some copper wire.....make a coil......pass a magnet in and out of it and you can power an LED or read the power fluctuations on a voltmeter.
You should know what you're talking about before you open your mouth lol
this is 9th grade science haha
chuckcxr 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@st0rmforce
wrong lol
The changing magnetic fields produce energy that CAN be measured and used.
Take a spool...get some copper wire.....make a coil......pass a magnet in and out of it and you can power an LED or read the power fluctuations on a voltmeter.
You should know what you're talking about before you open your mouth lol
this is 9th grade science haha
chuckcxr 1 year ago
@st0rmforce no one is suggesting that magnets produce power in and of themselves, but rather, that magnets are just a means of producing power in the same way that magnets inside a conventional generator produce electricity.
NeilAnthony69 11 months ago
@NeilAnthony69 I meant that things like this are using attracting or repelling magnets to power it. The problem is that it is a one-way thing. Example:
Magnet A attracts the arm. As it gets near to it, its attracted to Magnet B. B then has to pull the arm away from A which would take the same amount of energy that was generated from A pulling the arm.
The way of getting around this is to put B closer to the arm. To get past the last magnet you need to pull with more energy than the magnet.
st0rmforce 10 months ago
@st0rmforce fucking simple right people who think its possible to get free energy need to know any action will have an opposite equal reaction so its imposible to produce energy because theres no difference left from the action/reaction
TheSovietBears 9 months ago
@st0rmforce All we need is something that stops the magnetic field without itself becoming magnetized.
nexus1g 8 months ago
@st0rmforce yes, that is true, but who said anything about just two magnets? there could always be a carrier magnet in place being halfway borrowed.
ricky94533 7 months ago
@st0rmforce
But with the spinning itself, couldn't it be used as a catalyst to produce heat or power a machine that operates from being cranked? There has to be something useful that it can be used for.
AllPro777 6 months ago
@AllPro777 No. Perpetual motion machines simply don't exist, and so it'd use more energy than it generates, and so it would just be an eletronic motor.
LeeviON 6 months ago
@LeeviON There is no Perpetum Mobile - "scientists" say. Ok, what is Solar System ? ... hmm, well it receives energy from Galaxy. Ok, what is Galaxy... well it took energy from The Big Bang. Ok, what is Big Bang? well, we don't know yet. Ok, you don't know but you know that it is not Pepetum Mobile? Yes. hmmm.. something is wrong with "the science".
hardyVeles 5 months ago
@hardyVeles Just because you don't know what it is doesn't make it a perpetum mobile. Think about it. Everything needs energy to move. And there is nothing that would have zero friction - so no matter what you use as an axel, it needs more energy to move than it creates moving. Energy can of course be produced by a very hard process from matter, but yet still, there is no infinite amount of matter, so it'd stop someday and so would your energy you need to spin the wheel.
LeeviON 5 months ago
@st0rmforce sorry your wrong it work just have to look in it but showing a jack ass water dont mean it will drink
scouttroop291 2 months ago
the reason why people bicker on youtube when it comes to over-unity is because of the scarcity mindset and the current trend of dominating nature, animals, everything.
"if I can't get a free lunch, nobody can"
when people colaborate for positive change through fringe science, something happens and big progress is made. peace.
hotfreshrider 1 year ago 43
@hotfreshrider i finally have the right set of words to explain to others almost exactly what you did. thank you.
yoyorico 1 year ago
@hotfreshrider That is so absolutely a worthy thing to back up, you've just said there! 1 love!
MortenBoHansen 1 year ago 2
@hotfreshrider So true. I also believe its the thought process of the average college educated human that is afraid to let go of what they were taught to recite perhaps due to peers and money spent on education.
sickasso72 1 year ago
@sickasso72
No. We just want verifiable, empirical proof. We aren't going to just go with something just because it seems like it is cool and "goes against the machine".
I need numbers. I need peer reviewed papers. I need this reproduced in a lab setting. I ned something more than a shady youtube video which not only looks fake, but could have an electric motor hidden in so many places.
melancholyid 11 months ago
@melancholyid The electric motor is in the middle of the picture. It's powered by the wires which are in platn view.Tha whole thing IS an electric motor.
winterka100 10 months ago
@hotfreshrider That was odd... I was in the middle of watching the TV show FRINGE when i came to youtube and my channel said i might like this.
amacattackable 10 months ago
@hotfreshrider The wisest comment I have ever read here! Well done you!
RADARULES 4 months ago
@RADARULES No, that is the dumbest one of all. Reality does not work that way, and the sooner you guys realise that, the sooner we can actually get to that post-scarcity society by doing real, productive science.
Here's a question: What do you call "fringe" science that has been proven right? Science.
Magnetohydrodynamics 3 months ago
@Magnetohydrodynamics Talk about dumb statements... here's a question for you...how can you say in one breath, that reality doesn't work that way... only then say in the next breath that fringe science proven correct becomes science? Doesn't the latter part of that statement alone give testimony to the fact that it does work that way? Without fringe science, profound scientific discoveries that forever change today's science would forever remain hidden. Science must push the envelope.
RADARULES 3 months ago
@hotfreshrider but this has nothing to do with science. it's just plain stupid building overunity machines. our physical models, which have been proven over and over again, simply say there's no such thing. learn to accept the reality and deal with it, rather than hunt after your stupid dreams.
Kenji314159 1 month ago
This is called an "Adams Motor", this thing does not produce any net energy output. It will actually drain its battery but very slowly.
vstolyarov123 1 year ago
@vstolyarov123 If it spins, it can create small amounts of energy, right? Just open up the top and put some coiled copper and whatever else you need... create the energy needed to spin it by it's very own spinning? xd
shizengenshou 1 year ago
@shizengenshou This thing is connected to a battery and that's where it takes the energy to spin. This is a very efficient motor but it is not free energy.
vstolyarov123 1 year ago
Woah, i came up with this idea a year ago, never built it; its nice to see great minds think alike. Looks like it works, are they electro magnets?
PrinceOfDarkness2k7 1 year ago
How much time has been the longest continuous amount running? How much electricity is used to power the magnets?
boldger13 1 year ago
when will people stop being mean to each other and work together
no one is completly right all the time, please build a bridge and get over your differences and work together
spanglerangle 1 year ago
it is like everybody seems to forget about ALL of teslas work .. inparticular the teslar tower and the free energy to be gotten any where from the plenet..... making generators is in that respect a waste till you've mastered building a dumb thing take the limitless energy thats already there!
maxkongo 1 year ago
gravity = electromagnetic field
kind of polarity system
SpartanG61 1 year ago
I think something like this could run on its own if you had a wire rail that went around the circumference of the device at the same distance from center point as the magnet on the arm, then attach a piece of magnetic shielding on the arm and hang it from the wire, then bend the wire at the problematic point so the shielding comes down at the last magnet. This should work no matter which way the arm goes (based on pulling or pushing)
I wish someone would try this idea.
304Stephen 1 year ago
hahaha its just replays of the same thing people over and over again
museapex 1 year ago
will u make a motor that never stop
infosoftify 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I invented a breakthrough energy source which violates the law of conservation of energy. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena which violate the law of energy conservation. I am looking for $30 000 for a prototype and $3M for patents. Making a 6 kW generator will cost $1200 in mass production, value of the energy produced per year $5400.
H. Tomasz Grzybowski
tel. +48-512-933-540
henrykay01 1 year ago
The reason why magnet motors don't work is because there are only 2 poles. North and South.You need 3 poles other wise it will hang up.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
it's a perpetuum mobile, or does magnets loose their energy anytime ?
Pwnyhof93 1 year ago
Nice video! Thanks for spending your time in making it. I hate read text without any grathic representation attached
OopsAiee 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 How many meanings are there for the word 'moron'?
Dimension13XYZZY 1 year ago
@Dimension13XYZZY well lets look at one; Dimension13XYZZY is a meaning of Moron.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
is this machine claiming overunity?
MediaMisDirected 1 year ago
Im confused, did someone point out that this engine isn't practical on a large scale?
firesickle 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I invented a breakthrough energy source that violates the law of energy conservation. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena that violate the law of energy conservation. I am looking for $6M for a prototype and patents.
H. Tomasz Grzybowski
tel. +48-512-933-540
henrykay01 1 year ago
Looks like I am hitting a soft spot here. Maybe I should keep hitting it with some more proven facts. Just to see if they are denied as well.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 Proven facts? Sure, that would be nice for a change.
Dimension13XYZZY 1 year ago
@Dimension13XYZZY You are just a hack dude get a life. You barley even know what we were talking about let alone understanding anything I posted. Way over you simple little mind. Go troll somewhere else.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@Dimension13XYZZY Ok smart ass, name one fact that has not been proven.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 Ok, you are an american idiot, i know... but ffs - this is just too unbelievably dumb. You are an embarresment to humankind.
Dimension13XYZZY 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 "You can leave the armature alone and replace the PM(permanent magnets) with stronger magnets. Now you have a more powerful motor than before but using the same amount of energy. This is because the PM are performing part of the work out put."
No TimFuckingDumbassRocket, you are absolutely and totally fucking wrong. You clearly do not understand the very basics about how trivial technology like electric motors work.
Dimension13XYZZY 1 year ago
@Dimension13XYZZY Oh yes I do! I have done this and know this to be a fact by my own experience not just what someone tells me which is how you think you "know things"
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 Exactly *what* have you done, Tim? And exactly *what* do you think you understand from it? You obviously lack knowledge about basic physics. Do you even understand what happens and why? Or are you just guessing?
You know, this is pretty basic stuff for most people. It is very easy to calculate and it is easily empirically verifiable.
How is it that you dont understand things like this? Did you skip school? How old are you?
Dimension13XYZZY 1 year ago
@Dimension13XYZZY If you can't explain it, it doesn't exist. The laws of thermodynamics seem to be getting stretched a lot, lately... methinks they may be more like guidelines =P.
ParrhesiaJoe 1 year ago
@Dimension13XYZZY Well he does believe gravity is stronger than electromagnetism, which explains a lot. Im guessing that basic knowledge must have a pre-requisite of Science for pepul hoo kaint spel syance. Then you get to touch electric motors, and actually learn about the 4 forces.
painxtreme 1 year ago
@painxtreme Ever go to a junk yard? They have cranes with a big Electro magnet that lifts up cars when turned On and when turned Off, the car drops like a bad habit.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 because electromagnetism is stronger than gravity, while the electromagnetism is in effect, it wins, shut it off, gravity goes back to work. Gravity is very powerful once in the realm of huge, space bending objects like planets and stars, but...one last example 2 people 10 ft apart, both weighing 200lbs. They do exert gravity on each other, but not enough to detect. Now put 2-200lb magnets 10 ft apart. I'll rest my case, if that doesn't splain it for ya, nothings gonna.
painxtreme 1 year ago
@painxtreme I get your point. But man 200lb Magnets are dangerous so I will pass on the experiment part. lol
My point was that you can turn On and Off an electromagnet but not a permanent magnet.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
What is this obsession with magnets being a form of "anti-gravity" By that logic my table has "Anti-Gravity" properties as it stops my plates tumbling to the earth.
MarshyMarshMan 1 year ago
@MarshyMarshMan you should try explaining that to timrocket2008, he seems not to understand the universal law of gravitation so far...
luisdanielmesa 1 year ago
@MarshyMarshMan Your table is a structure ultimately connected to the ground as it uses gravity to keep your dinner plate on your table. So my understanding is that is Gravity. Not anti-gravity.
luisdanielmesa might be right. I am not sure I understand fully.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@timrocket2008 "I am not sure I understand fully." - Well that must be your hallmark, timrocket. *snicker*
Dimension13XYZZY 1 year ago
antigravity =P LOL timrocket2008 you're a rocket scientist... hahaha.
luisdanielmesa 1 year ago
Magnets are gravity and anti gravity. Anything anti gravity does not eliminate gravity. There is a huge difference there.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
lol another looney... gravitation cannot be eliminated, hence UNIVERSAL law of gravitation, the only way for an object not to be ruled by such law is the be either too far from all the rest of the objects in the universe or to have NO MASS at all, and i don't mean a negligible mass i mean no mass. "magnets are gravity and antigravity" LOL. Bodies with mass are gravity, and there's nothing contrary to gravity.
luisdanielmesa 1 year ago
@luisdanielmesa You did not fully understand if at all that I was correcting someone. You are the Loony for chiming in where you are out of element.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
you could counter gravity... it's the use of the term "antigravity" that i laugh at... antigravity can be accomplished in 2 ways: 1) having a squared distance to be negative, which is impossible since in real numbers all squares are positive) or 2) having a negative mass which my imagination cannot yet conceive... so the term antigravity is useless since it's something that cannot exist. I'm not saying you cannot create a force opposite to gravity to counter it and escape (like rockets do)
luisdanielmesa 1 year ago
@luisdanielmesa You laughing at anti gravity means you like gravity. Ok I guess you speak other languages than English.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
i like gravity? it doesn't matter if i "like"(?) it or not... it's what we have. Antigravity is impossible and nonsense... so implying something IS antigravity (magnets or anything else) is simply nonsense.
luisdanielmesa 1 year ago
@luisdanielmesa I guess you never heard of a gyroscope which is semi anti gravity but to a knucklehead like you, thats simply nonsense also and they do not exist.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
LOL... there's enogh info on wikipedia for you... and i dare you to find the term "antigravity"... see ya... thanks for making me laugh... lol... gyroscope antigravity... you are an example of some education system not doing its job...
luisdanielmesa 1 year ago
@luisdanielmesa LOL @ wikipedia Anyone can write anything they want on that. Do some real research dude.
When I Google something, I know to steer clear away from wikipedia to find accurate results.
And you make fun of an education system but yet you go by wikipedia.lol
Also there is a big difference between anti and semi anti just so that you learn a little from this since you have a lot to learn as we can see.
I guess you are not the sharpest tool in shed there buddy.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 the diff between anti and semi anti is zero... in the sense that there's neither of them, they don't exist... i give you a start, and at least point out a source of information (good or bad is for others to decide) where's your source that claims the diff between semi and anti? LOL. ONE source is better than NONE. I don't have to prove antigravity doesn't exist, science works the other way around, prove it exists and you'll be ahead, otherwise you're still at the bottom =) cheers
luisdanielmesa 1 year ago
@luisdanielmesa I have to give you a source idiot? You never heard of a gyroscope.
Levitation is anti gravity. What is so hard for you to understand?
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 i think the problem here is about concepts, so you're saying that anything that levitates is antigravity? i disagree, the universal law of gravity states that 2 bodies attract each other, BUT are subject to other forces as well, therefore, any other force that acts opposite direction of that attraction and to the line joining the centermass of any 2 bodies is antigravity? so if i lift a grocery bag, if i pilot a helicopter, etc is that antigravity? a gyroscope is not antigravity.
luisdanielmesa 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 wrote:
@luisdanielmesa I have to give you a source idiot? You never heard of a gyroscope.
LOL, yes you need to give me a source, otherwise you don't have a valid point, it's a fallacy. I can say "oompaloompas exist" but i can't say " everyone knows they exist, are you an idiot?" just to explain it... so, sources instead of looney talk please.
luisdanielmesa 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 gyroscopes operate on the concept of precesion. How this works is to do with angular momentum and torque applied to rotating object by gravity, it has absolutly nothing to do with anti-gravity, and i would be happy to explain to you how it works if i could be bothered travelling to where you live
mica410 1 year ago
@mica410 how many meanings are there for anti gravity? How many meanings are there for the word ~work~?
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 scientifically? or in laymens terms? if by anti gravity you mean some force opposing and sucesfully beating gravity, then yes this is anti gravity, as would be lifting a rock off the ground
mica410 1 year ago
@mica410 counter gravity vs. anti gravity. Lifting a rock off of the ground is not anti gravity. If you hold it level, you are utilizing Earth's gravity to stay in your hand.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 that wasnt the point, the point was how are you defining anti gravity?
because scientifically anti gravity is having a object free from the force of gravity, which is not the case with gyroscopes
mica410 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 Thats why gravity is the weakest of the 4 known forces. A refrigerator magnet is stronger than gravity. Gravity only becomes powerful with extraordinary size involved. Most things do not bend space that much until you reach planetary mass.
painxtreme 1 year ago
@painxtreme You think a refrigerator magnet is stronger than earth's gravity?
Hold the magnet 12 inches from the refrigerator and 24 inches from the floor. If the magnet were stronger than Earth' gravity, it would hit the refrigerator but it will just hit the floor. So you are 150% wrong.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 i think he may have been saying it is stronger in scale, so if earth was the size of a refrigerator it would be stronger
PropagatedFreedom 1 year ago
@PropagatedFreedom but doesn't a refrigerator have gravity? if the Earth were the same size it would be weaker. I think the smaller the Earth or any mass is weaker the smaller it is.
Its one of those old theories from Einstein. Its not a fact though.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 possibly, but i believe that mass does not posses gravity until a certain point, and once large enough some where in the core mass converts into energy that serves as the attractive force (gravity)
PropagatedFreedom 1 year ago
@PropagatedFreedom Core; Kinda like the Nucleolus in a magnet? They say the Earth is a giant magnet so would a fridge magnet levitate on the north pole if you face the North pole of the magnet down and will it be heavier if you face the south down if standing on the North Pole?
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 no... more like how the sun radiates energy in all detections from all points of the core and then from all points of the surface, i think gravity is a attractive form of radiation... but i don't know.. that's just my speculation
PropagatedFreedom 1 year ago
@PropagatedFreedom Fun to think about because Einstein's and other's theories are only theories. Not absolute facts.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 Relativity theory is completely false and contradicts itself.
henrykay01 1 year ago
@henrykay01
yeah, and you got the college degree to proof it and disproof a billion other people.
Good job.
Yezpahr 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 Im not going to waste any further time with this after this statement. Gravity becomes powerful only with great mass. Let's look at your experiment this way. Put a paperclip on the table. Hold a magnet above it. Voilå magnetism defeats gravity. Were gravity stronger than magnetism, the paperclip would stay put, no?
Talking about gravity between small objects is a mug's game. My gravitational pull on my wife hasn't gotten a beer down here.
painxtreme 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 wikipedia, for the most part, is contributed to by scientists and university residents. If you think information on there is suspect, check the sources, they are all listed at the bottom of the page
mica410 1 year ago
@mica410 Wrong! the last time I checked anyone online can input their own to all information.
You dont have to be a Scientist or a University resident to post information on Wkipedia. I am surprised that you didn't realize that. I guess you are just dim witted a bit.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 yes anyone can write stuff on wikipedia, but it gets monitored, records are kept of who changed what, and errors are normally correced quickly. Yes people can fud stuff up, thats why you check the sources
and i didnt say people couldnt post stuff, i just said that most of the articles are written by scientists.
mica410 1 year ago
@mica410 Well I find too many flaws in information on Wikipedia in which I am sure of so when it comes to researching things I don't know about, I steer clear away from Wikipedia because of it's often miss informative nature.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 fair enough, you should never take things at face value, i would never use wikipedia as a source for papers, but it is a good guide and can lead you to other sources
mica410 1 year ago
@mica410 It only leads you to other pages of Wikipedia.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@luisdanielmesa Dude what you are saying makes no sense.
It seems you are just making it an argument of vocabulary; what anti gravity means.
Also you call it impossible but say it is possible to counter it and even escape it.
I guess your vocabulary is better than mine. Please explain since so far you make zero sense.
None whatsoever.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008
Gravitation: Universal law.
Gravity: vector sum of all gravitational pulls.
Anti-gravity: err... the opposite of gravity. LOL.
You cannot ESCAPE gravity, it's impossible, you can reduce it's INFLUENCE (defy it). Newton deducted the simple form and Einstein gave another insight.
"masses distort spacetime in their vicinity, and other particles move in trajectories determined by the geometry of spacetime".
luisdanielmesa 1 year ago
@luisdanielmesa This is very interesting. I must admit.
Seems like NASA broke the laws of physics with their claim of Escaping Earth's Gravity and entering into the Moon's Gravity.
I never heard that before. very interesting. No wonder people say they faked the Moon landings.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 How can they be breaking the laws of physics if i'm precisely explaining you that you can never escape them (by difinition they are "laws", they apply at all times)?
·Earth's gravity -> can be (almost) escaped.
Universal Law of Graivtation -> cannot be escaped.
luisdanielmesa 1 year ago
@timrocket2008
Nasa uses the laws of physics to counter the law universal gravitation, it's called Engineering. The use of physics laws to achieve a goal.
1) Heat a gas -> expansion -> pressure.
2) Action-Reaction: they push matter one direction which impluses them in the other.
3) The further away you are the less the influence of earth's gravity is.
4) The rockets lose mass as they move up and therefore contribute, if a piece of the rocket goes down, the rest of the rocket aacelerates
luisdanielmesa 1 year ago
@timrocket2008
A rough example is when a ball rests on a cloth which is tied on the corners, and you put another smaller ball near the edge, it will roll inside. The cloth acts as spacetime and the smaller balls moves in a path towards the bigger ball. If iinstead of putting the small one, you make it roll in another direction, then it will "orbit" towards the bigger one.
luisdanielmesa 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 "@luisdanielmesa Dude what you are saying makes no sense. I guess your vocabulary is better than mine. Please explain since so far you make zero sense." - I guess you have to grow a brain before you try to understand him, Tim. He is explaining it in simple words, like you talk to small kids, and you think it's too hard to understand? Are you smarter than a 5th grader? Umm i'm starting to think you have few years left until fifth grade... or are you just trolling us??
Dimension13XYZZY 1 year ago
@Dimension13XYZZY us?
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 "us" as in we who try to explain things to you, even though you don't even try to read and understand...
Dimension13XYZZY 1 year ago
@Dimension13XYZZY You haven't explained anything retard.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@luisdanielmesa saying that gravity can not be eliminated was actually my original point and it has nothing to do with any anti gravity effect of an Earth magnet.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
Not to mention the 78% efficiency again but a Gas engine is only 38% efficient because it does not harness the free energy of Permanent Magnets like Electric motors do.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
Your math is wrong. Say you have a small electric motor and controller with an Input Power of 24 volts @ 41.67amps which is about 1000watts or 1KW. Now with a 78% motor efficiency, thats about 780Watts or about 1.04 Horsepower.
The permanent Magnets are delivering a minimum of 1/2 HP. So to say or think that Magnets can not perform work in an equation is a misconception because in reality, they do perform co-work.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@timrocket2008 "... 24 volts @ 41.67amps which is about 1000watts or 1KW. Now with a 78% motor efficiency, thats about 780Watts or about 1.04 Horsepower. The permanent Magnets are delivering a minimum of 1/2 HP"
Oh really? So you can hook up your magical electric motor to a generator, to another motor, to a generator... (well you get the point) and for each generator you get a power increase of about 50%? Input 1000W and get 1500W which becomes 2250W, 2275W, 5062W, and so on?
Dimension13XYZZY 1 year ago
@Dimension13XYZZY No because,for one there is a 22% loss at the motor shaft then you have more loss in drive line components and the resistance in coils of the motor used as a generator. By the time you calculate it all out you are probably down to 30% efficiency or 70% loss. What you fail to understand is that you can not get more output than input even if Earth magnets make a motor 50% more efficient (in which they do) there is still a loss in the resistance of the coils. It can never be100%E
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@Dimension13XYZZY That 1/2hp that the permanent magnets are delivering is correct in actuality. If you were to replace those permanent magnets with coil magnets, you would then need MORE input to have the SAME output as using the Magnets.
So theoretically if you used ALL permanent Magnets, there would be no need for electrical input (loss). It will never work because permanent magnets have only 2 poles. you would need 3 poles for it to work which is also theoretical. A coil magnet can T On/off
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008: I don't think you understand the difference between antigravity and levitation. Antigravity is something that makes gravity irrelevant or inactive. if you put a piece of plastic on top of a magnet it will fall. therefore it's is NOT antigravity. one magnet floating on top of another is magnetic levitation.
0oPrincesseSissi 1 year ago
@0oPrincesseSissi That would be Gravity Elimination NOT AntiGravity. Go back to school kid.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
if i can suspend a magnet in mid-air, only from the forces of another magnet, and it will stay in the air indefinitely, then by all logical standards how can this NOT be an example of antigravity? a magnet is ALWAYS "working". when its pushing and pulling its working. even when an object is stuck to the magnet, its still working.. magnetism in itself is PERPETUAL MOTION, therefore in the very least, requiring a little more attention from today's minds other than complete doubts and skepticism!
sketchartistmc 1 year ago
No, magnetism is not antigravity! if you hang an object on the celling with a rope and it doesn't fall, it's not antigravity, same thing happens with the magnet. Magnetism isn't perpetual motion, simply because there is no motion.
Also we have no doubt about magnetism, without it we wouldn't have any energy on the planet.
Perpetual motion by definition is 100% energy efficient. Magnetism cannot be 100% efficient because when you generate current there is a back emf i.e: magnetic friction.
0oPrincesseSissi 1 year ago
@0oPrincesseSissi and free energy must be 101% efficient or more, otherwise once you include the friction element connected the PPM to a turbine of sorts, the machine will lose energy and stop
drummeruptheirons 1 year ago
@drummeruptheirons Free Energy ...101% efficient or more?
You are confused with motor efficiency and thinking Free Energy means creating energy. Only "creating energy" would be breaking laws of physics/not possible.You don't understand what you are actually talking about.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
i get what you're saying. the same thing we have all been taught in school and from everyone else who claims to "know" the facts. but let me also inform you that the term "perpetual motion" in itself can never be based upon any facts because we as human beings have NO possible way of comprehending any absolute measure of "motion" or "rest". from our understanding we can assume we are in motion more than at rest simply from relative perspectives. thus, EXISTENCE is perpetual is it not?
sketchartistmc 1 year ago
@0oPrincesseSissi Your rope analogy is stupid because the object is connected to the ground by structure so thats not an example of anti gravity as a magnet is. A magnet is gravity and anti gravity.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@sketchartistmc You are right a Magnet is perpetual motion in its molecules. There is constant motion inside of a magnet.
timrocket2008 1 year ago