Apollo 11 Introduction Partial Restoration HD NASA Video

[Swehead]

Awesome

[numantunak]

And why do you believe that?

[arnie883]

you are the most stupid person on this planet its been proved we did go to the moon by the hubble telescope and the latest moon orbiter they both have zoomed in on all the apollo landing sites and all the gear is still there including the rovers and all the scientific stuff and the footprints!! oh and by the way dickhead where did over 850 pounds of moon rock come from?? thick idiot.

[yaluobud]

@arnie883

No Hubble space telescope has not seen the left over equipment on the moon. No photos of that description exist. Laser measurement instruments do not need a prismatic reflector to bounce a signal back ~ any solid surface will do. And so-called moon rocks came from Earth's own meteorite impact sites. It makes for an elaborate lie that NASA told to world. Sadly, blindly patriotic Americans are the only people left who still think Americans walked on the moon. It is time to wake up!

[tommyboomboom]

@yaluobud How is it that despite the hundreds of thousands of people who worked on the Apollo program, none has ever broken cover and declared it a hoax? The only people who still pursue such nonsense are half-witted 'self taught scientists' and 'investigators'. The photos arnie883 mentions do exist (NASA Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter) and a laser might reflect ok from a solid surface on earth but on an object 240,000 miles away you need a reflector. You are indeed an idiot.

[yaluobud]

@tommyboomboom

What is the web site address for your proof photos? The prismatic reflector in Apollo 11 was not even aimed back toward earth. What will you do when you have to eat your words? Will you show the same disrespectfull tone to your government and NASA for lying to you? Will you get as angry at yourself as you get to self taught idiot scientists? Be prepared for a rude awakening sweet child.

[tommyboomboom]

@yaluobud you don't understand how the reflector/laser system works. it doesn't need to be aimed, just aligned facing roughly towards earth. I can't be arsed to post individual web addresses here, do you not know how to use a search engine? And why did you not answer my first question? is it because you'd rather pick at imagined inconsistencies than accept the glaring truth?

[yaluobud]

@tommyboomboom

Even with 50K NASA workers and 300K contractors involved with the Apollo project it was well hidden by being broken down into smaller top secret operations which had little resemblance to the whole jigsaw of deceit. Many people performed tasks which related directly to the deceit, yet unknowingly compiled the mechanisms and strategies with out them even knowing, all thinking "how fantastic it is to be part of man's greatest achievement."

[yaluobud]

@tommyboomboom

Of the people involved with this lie not all have managed to keep their mouths shut. Several movie people who worked on the movies have subtly dropped hints in various movies . Capricorn One, Diamonds are Forever and Sneakers. Each of these movies mentions or shows another piece of the puzzle. Stanley Kubrick's film of 1968 " 2001 A Space Odyssey " developed the technical cinematography which was used to give the illusion of space travel, landing on the moon and moon walks.

[tommyboomboom]

@yaluobud Brilliant! Now I see where you get your ideas of reality from. From the movies. If there were a single piece of science in the Apollo program that could be proven to be false, then don't you think a reputable source would have challenged it by now? if not... and the science was all possible, proven and correct... are you saying they just faked it anyway? why would they do that? Rather than construct an elaborate, expensive hoax, why not just build a rocket and fly to the moon?

[yaluobud]

@tommyboomboom

Of course they built the rockets, and sent them into orbit, but flying through the van allen radiation belts would have fried the astronauts ~ hence the need to make a movie instead.

[tommyboomboom]

@yaluobud Van Allen himself states that this is not true. The radiation recieved by the astronauts was low. The metallic structure of the spacecraft prevented most of the the high energy particles reaching them. The timing and direction of the trans lunar coast  was chosen to minimuse exposure to the radiation belts

[yaluobud]

@tommyboomboom

Of course NASA built the rockets, and sent them into orbit, but flying through the van Allen Radiation Belts would have fried the astronauts ~ hence the need to make a movie instead.

As for some science, the samples of moon rock encapsulated in plastic resin spheres mounted on wooden stands that the US proudly gave various countries as souveniers was examined by Holland and found to be petrified wood. Ha Ha, now we have trees on the moon.

[Synthetrix]

@yaluobud More BS. Moon rock samples have been given to scientific labs around the world. All have independently geologically verified them as genuine. The moon rock that was given to the dutch is believed to have been stolen while in a private collection and substituted with the petrified wood. This is the only incident like this and hardly accounts for the 840 lbs of lunar samples return on the Apollo missions.

[yaluobud]

@Synthetrix

Rocks flew all the way to Earth, from the Moon as a result of a collision with an asteroid. All over the world you can pick up Moon stones. When the Crater Tyco was formed on the Moon approximately 700,000 years ago, debris from the collision was blasted into space. The impact was so great that parts of the Moon flew off into space. Earth collected some of this material as it swept through the scattered debris. Gene Shoemaker and Don Gault agreed with Dr Chapman's findings.

[Synthetrix]

@yaluobud Lunar meteorrites are rare. There are fewer than 30 meteorites known to be pieces of Earth's Moon (lunar meteorites). The total weight of all recovered moon meteorites is less than 10kg (compared to hundreds of lunar samples returned by Apollo missions). Lunar meteorites also bear the telltale signs of coming to earth through the atmosphere. The moon rocks do not.

[yaluobud]

@Synthetrix

Thanks for your input!

Over 160 meteorite impact craters have been identified on Earth and several new sites are found each year. The Oxygen isotopes in some of the tektites which fall to Earth are so similar to the Oxygen isotopes of Earth's own rocks that the only explanation available is that these rocks formed in the same vicinity as Earth did in the Solar system... therefore scientists deduced that these tektites must have come from the Moon.

[Synthetrix]

@yaluobud Even if scientists wanted to make something like a Moon rock by, say, bombarding an Earth rock with high energy atomic nuclei, they couldn't. Earth's most powerful particle accelerators can't energize particles to match the most potent cosmic rays, which are themselves accelerated in supernova blastwaves and in the violent cores of galaxies.

[yaluobud]

@tommyboomboom

US Pride was at stake. NASA wishing to save face carried out all the steps. The mighty Saturn V rockets were built and successfully carried their payload to low earth orbit. They did not travel through the van Allen belts or proceed to the moon.

In 1967 Intercontinental telecommunications successfully accomplished live TV on a global scale using a series of geostationary orbiting satellites.This technology was used to implement the illusion of NASA landing on the moon.

[tommyboomboom]

@yaluobud Don't you think the Russians would have been able to track the trans lunar flight, lunar orbit and LM landing? Surely they would have a rather stronger motivation to disprove the lunar landing than some armchair investigators. How exactly would you use a geostationary satellite network to create the illusion of a signal from the moon? I assure you it would be quite simple to tell the difference.

[yaluobud]

@tommyboomboom

Apollo 11 movie was televised in America on Sunday late night TV. At that time America was not facing the moon but Australia was at late-morning Monday 21st July. The supposed signal from the moon was received via NASA's Honeysuckle Creek Tracing Station near Canberra and then relayed via NASCOM and OTC back around the planet. However, the guy who was in charge of the tracking dish & signal from the moon realised it wasn't even aimed at the moon but at an orbiting satellite.

[tommyboomboom]

@yaluobud That sounds like a highly dodgy apocryphal tale to me. 'the guy who was in charge of the tracking dish realized...' etc etc. Again, I return you to my earlier point; don't you think the Russians would have noticed that there were no signals coming from the moon? given that they had sent several probes to the moon in previous years.

[SovietWarrior]

@arnie883 Nobody's but the yanks themselves have ever seen those mythical "850 pounds" of moon rock.

Guess what, with that treasure trove under their hand, the amount of moon rock the yanks have provided to international research can be counted in grams!

USSR has provided more moon rock to USA than USA to USSR!

HOAX! HOAX! HOAX!

[DeadlyNightShade11]

Yes! we have! get that through your thick skull!!!

[DeadlyNightShade11]

wow amazing =D i can't wait until man is on moon again... which might happen in....2020!! =D

[RazerDiamond]

Yeah... Moon in Nevada - West America :D haha

[MewFushisDad]

We should never have stopped going to the moon.

In 40 years we could have had a well established colony.

Some day, if we survive our own selves, we will need to leave this planet.

[LunarTuner]

MewFushisDad, I appreciate your enthusiasm, but continuing to go the moon for short-duration missions like Apollo would have been prohibitively costly and the long-duration study needed would have been much better to do in low earth orbit (as has been the case). Finally, we're about ready.

[leverick]

Nice work Airboyd! Well done!

[ironman127b]

this is to amazing

[souliscool101]

their ano word i can say to how great this is THANKS YOU SO MUCH