I do believe that astronauts landed on Lunar surface but this video is fake because when they placed flag it began waving how it is possible without air...
FEB 4, 2011 -Using two high-resolution LROC images taken from two separate orbits, scientists have formed a stereo image pair for 3D measurements at the Apollo 14 landing site. Among the visible objects are the descent stage of the Apollo 14 lunar module Antares, the ALSEP, a rock nicknamed Turtle Rock, & multiple astronaut traverse footpaths clearly indicated by disturbed soils. Data processing methods can be used to identify the objects and measure their sizes and shapes. Game over hoaxturds
@Winstonz0r So sorry if I sound stupid lol. But I don't believe in this at all. ~ Everyone is having their opinion, you shouldn't have any problems with it.
You know, just a while ago, in my country, they showed a documentary of this moon-landing- thing. I watched it with my friend. A few times, those two astronauts were jumping on the moon, something like ten metres away from their plane. Who hold the camera while these two were flying and jumping around the moon, huh ? + When they're placing the flag, upper part of the flag is held out on a wire, but rest of the flag is moving ? When I was smaller, I believed in this, tho.
@AIDENYY They had several cameras mounted on the LEM legs and on tripods on the ground. In calling it a "plane", you are demonstrating to everyone how fucking clueless you are about this stuff. It waves because there's someone trying to stuff it into the ground, and it keeps waving due to lack of friction.
Look at the size of his shadow when he is next to the flag and than look how the shadow is getting longer as closer gets to the camera, and to the light source. This proves that the light source is not the Sun! In real Sun light this is an impossibility that everybody can check it out for themselves. WE ARE NOT RETARDS!.. YOU MOTHERFUCKER SLAVE!
@nfexp You need to learn about relativity and light physics guy XD If the moon landing was faked, then Russia would have to have been in on it too. SINCE THEY TRACKED US THE ENTIRE TRIP TO THE MOON AND BACK!! Anyone that thinks this conspiracy shit is true needs their ass kicked. I can't wait till the U.S. comes up with a cure for the "Stupid" gene.
w/e... it does not affect ME personally right now... if they laned on the moon, god for them, if nobody has been there... well.. hurry the fuck up and get there
Why did NASA digitally remaster all their moon landing tapes recently? They said it was normal protocol! Whats normal about deleting and re-editing the only original moonlanding tapes? Thats enough proof to show they never landed (although they won the race to the moon).
Of course we've been to the moon. Its a piece of piss. Casablanca was made in 1942 !! What other proof do you have that it was never made before the digitally re-mastered version.
@delahaye100 Well NASA openly admit what happened. Its just a bit strange. The original footage was tarted up digitally so the picture was clearer ..etc but then deleted the original. they said that the deleting of original video footage of the moon landing was normal protocol. Given that this is the only moonlanding footage they had I find it strange they would have this operating procedure in place over 40 years ago in the event that digital re-mastering would be a thing of the (then) future.
@MrGobbledegook You can't delete film. They never admitted to destroying it. They simply just made copies into digital platform XD where to you get your info?
@MrGobbledegook They did it because original film tends to degrade over time. To keep track of records everything was copied to a digital source to protect it. Plus, Russia tracked the U.S. all the way to the moon AND back. If it was a hoax, then Russia was in on it too.
when he runs back to the camera, look at his feet, and how fast the ... dirt is moving.. wouldn't it just turn into dust? cause the gravity is low on the moon... it don't make sense to me
The thing that most people seem to miss is that this wasn't an American achievement... it was a human achievement... and will be when man goes back to the moon in 2020. Provided that is that you all don't think the international space station is a hoax as well. Perhaps GPS is all one big illusion as well as countless other technologies the space program gave us.
Oh.. and the flag wouldn't have moved if he hadn't touched it. It's held out with a stick... there is video of them setting it up.
Well it cant be from the wind, if your thinking its a fake. Notice how in the flag is almost completly still in the begining of the video. It seems to only move when the person moves.
The ONLY logical explination for this is that the movement is caused by momentum. In my opinion thats proof that the luner land was NOT a hoax. T_T
i know, nobody has been on th emoon yet... but MAYBE one day... and from what i heard, there are support rods supposedly holding up the flag, so it looks like its waving... but i think it's all a load of shit
lol... neither to be exact... but there is NO proof of man being on the moon.. and if they did it 40 years ago, how come they can't send more people up there now? jesus crist.. you fucking americans are lower than dirt... i got my opinion, you have your. the end
Going to the moon is a piece of piss. It just costs too much to man the mission. The race was won. Question is why have they not had anyone land on Mars? Or have they? I don't know. That would be a piece of piss too if there was anything to gain from it.
Thats not a fabric. If it was fabric then it qould just fall off. Plus they are not stupid enough to take fabric there and leave it and not see the flag. They wanted to some other matrial where the flasg actually stands.
Not every light source casts shadows. Look up "diffuse light source". Now there are three bright spots on the helmet, they are not aligned, the smallest is above the others. Thus these are not multiple reflections which don't show thru the gold visor anyway as demonstrated in "True Apollo Visor Reflections".
Don't worry folks, I was fooled for three decades, too, before realising it was a lie. A painful process, but necessary.
You're fooling yourself. What do you know about light, raytracing and effects outside of what you know here on earth? Have you ever been on the moon? When nothing is in your brain, anyone is able to fill it with crap. To defend yourself, make your own picture. Watch your videos as critical as the ones from others and you will find out, that a camera output is not reality. Ask how 250000 people worldwide could be part of a scam of this dimension and noone speaks out.
The multiple reflections could be caused by the fact that the astronaut was wearing two visors. One was part of the pressure suit,and the other was the famous 'gold visor'. Light bouncing between the two could cause multiple reflections. If there really was multiple light sources, then there would be multiple shadows, especially if they were as far apart as the reflections would suggest if they were from multiple light sources.
Hey Dogmeat.. You do realize that straydogs eat dog meat right? .. LOL
"the shadow being casteed"???.. ROTF is right!.. Before you call anyone else a dumbass again, take a spelling class .. and while you're at it learn why the offical Apollo record is a huge load of manure.. That you should understand, seeing as that's what you post here.
O ya for a Typo! that's like me saying for you to learn how to spell lol. you an the whole .. that should be a period. :) but yes it is the sun. also if you think it's a Conspiracy then explain Apollo 8 an 13. :)
"casteed" is NOT a typo when the word you were searching your feeble brain for is "cast".
Apollo 8 and 13 were also hoaxes.. Just different kinds .. One pretended to orbit the Moon, while the other pretended to have a "Houston, we have a problem" moment.
It doesn't matter what number the "mission" was because they were all a scam in one way or another.
hoaxs? rofl. hey dumbass the Soviets listened in on the Operation. to see if it was fake. they even said the moon landings are real. also then explain the pics from apollo 8 lol. what are you going to say when we return? it's fake too lol. it's the Sun. plain an simple. O ya also go explain the MOON ROCKS dumbass!
"yes straydog i see it multiple light sources reflected on the visor"
Yeah, they're pretty obvious aren't they? Glad you hear you're not wearing NASA's rose tinted glasses, which doesn't allow those wearing them to see anything they don't want to see.
It's nothing to do with 'NASA's Rose tinted glasses' I couldn't give two shits about NASA or American pride, I wouldnt put it past the government to fake it and I think its also perfectly reasonable that it happens, but what I DON'T believe in, is getting on your high horse about other peoples half baked theorys that are being spouted again and again all over you tube by people who havent stopped to think about weather they even make sense or not.
"is getting on your high horse about other peoples half baked theorys that are being spouted again and again all over you tube by people who havent stopped to think about weather they even make sense or not. "
That should be "whether" they make sense or not ... and some of the hoax evidence makes sense and some doesn't... There's no reason to get hostile about it.
lol, guys, the flag is moving because the astronaut is moving it around....use your goddamn heads you fucking belligerent apes.
PokeTradersComm 5 months ago
@PokeTradersComm No hoax theory is too stupid for the hoaxers to use.
Laurelindo 5 months ago
I do believe that astronauts landed on Lunar surface but this video is fake because when they placed flag it began waving how it is possible without air...
zulfiqaralam1 6 months ago
@zulfiqaralam1 They twist and turn it around and it starts to move, and then there's no air resistance to slow it down so it keeps moving.
PLUS, the gravity on the moon is much weaker so it needs much more time to stabilize itself.
Laurelindo 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PROOF that Andy Harglesis, disbeliever of Apollo landings, is famous:
Andy Harglesis's Wikipedia page: /wiki/AndyHarglesis after en(dot)wikipedia(dot)org
andyharglesissupport 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FEB 4, 2011 -Using two high-resolution LROC images taken from two separate orbits, scientists have formed a stereo image pair for 3D measurements at the Apollo 14 landing site. Among the visible objects are the descent stage of the Apollo 14 lunar module Antares, the ALSEP, a rock nicknamed Turtle Rock, & multiple astronaut traverse footpaths clearly indicated by disturbed soils. Data processing methods can be used to identify the objects and measure their sizes and shapes. Game over hoaxturds
Synthetrix 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Alan Shepard never walked on the moon. The Apollo moon missions were faked in a studio. Here's a link to some of the hoax evidence.
spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showthread (dot) php?t=144487
(check link for gaps)
FatFreddy88 1 year ago
hey, if you americans really were in the moon, what the hell is wrong with the flag . theres no air in the space
AIDENYY 1 year ago
@AIDENYY
The flag is held out on a wire you imbecile.
TheJomogogo 1 year ago
@AIDENYY Can't tell if trolling or just incredibly stupid.
Winstonz0r 6 months ago
@Winstonz0r So sorry if I sound stupid lol. But I don't believe in this at all. ~ Everyone is having their opinion, you shouldn't have any problems with it.
AIDENYY 6 months ago
You know, just a while ago, in my country, they showed a documentary of this moon-landing- thing. I watched it with my friend. A few times, those two astronauts were jumping on the moon, something like ten metres away from their plane. Who hold the camera while these two were flying and jumping around the moon, huh ? + When they're placing the flag, upper part of the flag is held out on a wire, but rest of the flag is moving ? When I was smaller, I believed in this, tho.
AIDENYY 6 months ago
@AIDENYY They had several cameras mounted on the LEM legs and on tripods on the ground. In calling it a "plane", you are demonstrating to everyone how fucking clueless you are about this stuff. It waves because there's someone trying to stuff it into the ground, and it keeps waving due to lack of friction.
Promptly kill yourself.
Winstonz0r 6 months ago
@AIDENYY numpty...
blagger56 6 months ago
Look at the size of his shadow when he is next to the flag and than look how the shadow is getting longer as closer gets to the camera, and to the light source. This proves that the light source is not the Sun! In real Sun light this is an impossibility that everybody can check it out for themselves. WE ARE NOT RETARDS!.. YOU MOTHERFUCKER SLAVE!
nfexp 1 year ago
@nfexp You need to learn about relativity and light physics guy XD If the moon landing was faked, then Russia would have to have been in on it too. SINCE THEY TRACKED US THE ENTIRE TRIP TO THE MOON AND BACK!! Anyone that thinks this conspiracy shit is true needs their ass kicked. I can't wait till the U.S. comes up with a cure for the "Stupid" gene.
BDakota95 1 year ago
Comment removed
jmart550 2 years ago
w/e... it does not affect ME personally right now... if they laned on the moon, god for them, if nobody has been there... well.. hurry the fuck up and get there
matt24cooke 2 years ago
Why did NASA digitally remaster all their moon landing tapes recently? They said it was normal protocol! Whats normal about deleting and re-editing the only original moonlanding tapes? Thats enough proof to show they never landed (although they won the race to the moon).
MrGobbledegook 2 years ago
Comment removed
TheJomogogo 2 years ago
Of course we've been to the moon. Its a piece of piss. Casablanca was made in 1942 !! What other proof do you have that it was never made before the digitally re-mastered version.
MrGobbledegook 2 years ago
@MrGobbledegook what was deleted and reedited and how?
delahaye100 1 year ago
@delahaye100 Well NASA openly admit what happened. Its just a bit strange. The original footage was tarted up digitally so the picture was clearer ..etc but then deleted the original. they said that the deleting of original video footage of the moon landing was normal protocol. Given that this is the only moonlanding footage they had I find it strange they would have this operating procedure in place over 40 years ago in the event that digital re-mastering would be a thing of the (then) future.
MrGobbledegook 1 year ago
@MrGobbledegook You can't delete film. They never admitted to destroying it. They simply just made copies into digital platform XD where to you get your info?
BDakota95 1 year ago
@MrGobbledegook They didn't even make copies of the footage til the 80's and 90's
BDakota95 1 year ago
@MrGobbledegook They did it because original film tends to degrade over time. To keep track of records everything was copied to a digital source to protect it. Plus, Russia tracked the U.S. all the way to the moon AND back. If it was a hoax, then Russia was in on it too.
BDakota95 1 year ago
when he runs back to the camera, look at his feet, and how fast the ... dirt is moving.. wouldn't it just turn into dust? cause the gravity is low on the moon... it don't make sense to me
matt24cooke 2 years ago
It's been sped up at least 2X normal. Look at how fast the astronaut is moving.
TheJomogogo 2 years ago
why would live feed be 2x faster? and why does the guy with the flag not move fast too?
matt24cooke 2 years ago
from the text thejomogogo looks like he is in the age of 11 and 14 hahahaha be tried to flame me then but i think he failed
h34lyfe 2 years ago
This video isn't fake you friggin RETARDS!
jejazz13 2 years ago 8
This has been flagged as spam show
@jejazz13 PROOF that Andy Harglesis, disbeliever of Apollo landings, is famous:
Andy Harglesis's Wikipedia page: /wiki/AndyHarglesis after en(dot)wikipedia(dot)org
andyharglesissupport 9 months ago
Is that flag still standing, or was it eventualy destroyed by solar fairs?
peacefulinvasion 2 years ago
The thing that most people seem to miss is that this wasn't an American achievement... it was a human achievement... and will be when man goes back to the moon in 2020. Provided that is that you all don't think the international space station is a hoax as well. Perhaps GPS is all one big illusion as well as countless other technologies the space program gave us.
Oh.. and the flag wouldn't have moved if he hadn't touched it. It's held out with a stick... there is video of them setting it up.
PaleHearse 2 years ago
No ordinary flag, one that can cope with the extreme hot and cold temperatures and withstand high speed foreign objects.
EinkOLED 2 years ago
fake again im sure theres nothing up there so whys the flag flowing like that i can see some american trying to argue with this hahahaha
h34lyfe 2 years ago
i agree, im trying to be the most hated person on youtube for believing the "moon landing" was a hoax
matt24cooke 2 years ago
Well it cant be from the wind, if your thinking its a fake. Notice how in the flag is almost completly still in the begining of the video. It seems to only move when the person moves.
The ONLY logical explination for this is that the movement is caused by momentum. In my opinion thats proof that the luner land was NOT a hoax. T_T
peacefulinvasion 2 years ago
That has been explained so many times that only a retarded sack of leftover assfuckings would bring it up again, like he'd just been born. Like you.
TheJomogogo 2 years ago
i know, nobody has been on th emoon yet... but MAYBE one day... and from what i heard, there are support rods supposedly holding up the flag, so it looks like its waving... but i think it's all a load of shit
matt24cooke 2 years ago
FOR...FUCK....SAKE...look at it and the way they are moving. Are you blind and stupid?
TheJomogogo 2 years ago
lol... neither to be exact... but there is NO proof of man being on the moon.. and if they did it 40 years ago, how come they can't send more people up there now? jesus crist.. you fucking americans are lower than dirt... i got my opinion, you have your. the end
matt24cooke 2 years ago
Going to the moon is a piece of piss. It just costs too much to man the mission. The race was won. Question is why have they not had anyone land on Mars? Or have they? I don't know. That would be a piece of piss too if there was anything to gain from it.
MrGobbledegook 2 years ago
Wow it's windy up "there" ha?! lol
user17v 2 years ago
Thats not a fabric. If it was fabric then it qould just fall off. Plus they are not stupid enough to take fabric there and leave it and not see the flag. They wanted to some other matrial where the flasg actually stands.
mcpopopapopo 2 years ago
It is fabric, but there is a rode through a sewn in loop in the fabric on the upper horizontal edge to keep the flag from falling.
loperspest 2 years ago
Not every light source casts shadows. Look up "diffuse light source". Now there are three bright spots on the helmet, they are not aligned, the smallest is above the others. Thus these are not multiple reflections which don't show thru the gold visor anyway as demonstrated in "True Apollo Visor Reflections".
Don't worry folks, I was fooled for three decades, too, before realising it was a lie. A painful process, but necessary.
guillaumedock 3 years ago
You're fooling yourself. What do you know about light, raytracing and effects outside of what you know here on earth? Have you ever been on the moon? When nothing is in your brain, anyone is able to fill it with crap. To defend yourself, make your own picture. Watch your videos as critical as the ones from others and you will find out, that a camera output is not reality. Ask how 250000 people worldwide could be part of a scam of this dimension and noone speaks out.
WolYou 2 years ago
The multiple reflections could be caused by the fact that the astronaut was wearing two visors. One was part of the pressure suit,and the other was the famous 'gold visor'. Light bouncing between the two could cause multiple reflections. If there really was multiple light sources, then there would be multiple shadows, especially if they were as far apart as the reflections would suggest if they were from multiple light sources.
loperspest 3 years ago 5
If you pause the clip and 0.4 and start wanking furiously, you are probably a "moon hoaxer".
tubage07 3 years ago
If you pause the clip at 0.5 and 0.6 you can see what looks like multiple studio lighting reflected in the astronot's visor.
straydog02 3 years ago
hey dumbass ever heard of a thing called the SUN!!!!! look how the shadow is being casteed rofl. jeez Conspircy ppl are really stupid.
Dogmeat7 3 years ago
Hey Dogmeat.. You do realize that straydogs eat dog meat right? .. LOL
"the shadow being casteed"???.. ROTF is right!.. Before you call anyone else a dumbass again, take a spelling class .. and while you're at it learn why the offical Apollo record is a huge load of manure.. That you should understand, seeing as that's what you post here.
straydog02 3 years ago
an knowing ppl like you your going to go to a Conspiracy web sight. an look for info.
Dogmeat7 3 years ago
There's no need for me to go to any conspiracy site when all the hoax evidence can be found on NASA's Apollo sites.
straydog02 3 years ago
O ya for a Typo! that's like me saying for you to learn how to spell lol. you an the whole .. that should be a period. :) but yes it is the sun. also if you think it's a Conspiracy then explain Apollo 8 an 13. :)
Dogmeat7 3 years ago
"casteed" is NOT a typo when the word you were searching your feeble brain for is "cast".
Apollo 8 and 13 were also hoaxes.. Just different kinds .. One pretended to orbit the Moon, while the other pretended to have a "Houston, we have a problem" moment.
It doesn't matter what number the "mission" was because they were all a scam in one way or another.
straydog02 3 years ago
hoaxs? rofl. hey dumbass the Soviets listened in on the Operation. to see if it was fake. they even said the moon landings are real. also then explain the pics from apollo 8 lol. what are you going to say when we return? it's fake too lol. it's the Sun. plain an simple. O ya also go explain the MOON ROCKS dumbass!
Dogmeat7 3 years ago
yes straydog i see it multiple light sources reflected on the visor
harooni22 3 years ago
"yes straydog i see it multiple light sources reflected on the visor"
Yeah, they're pretty obvious aren't they? Glad you hear you're not wearing NASA's rose tinted glasses, which doesn't allow those wearing them to see anything they don't want to see.
straydog02 3 years ago
It's nothing to do with 'NASA's Rose tinted glasses' I couldn't give two shits about NASA or American pride, I wouldnt put it past the government to fake it and I think its also perfectly reasonable that it happens, but what I DON'T believe in, is getting on your high horse about other peoples half baked theorys that are being spouted again and again all over you tube by people who havent stopped to think about weather they even make sense or not.
mattmit 2 years ago
"is getting on your high horse about other peoples half baked theorys that are being spouted again and again all over you tube by people who havent stopped to think about weather they even make sense or not. "
That should be "whether" they make sense or not ... and some of the hoax evidence makes sense and some doesn't... There's no reason to get hostile about it.
straydog02 2 years ago
Nice to see. Too bad it isn't a longer clip (and slower). These videos, and those terrific pictures they all took are the max. Thanks.
mason104 4 years ago