Soviet nuke, called the Tsar Bomba...the largest, most powerful nuclear weapon ever detonated, and currently the most powerful explosive device ever created.
the bomb was originally designed to have a yield of about 100 megatons of TNT (420 PJ); however, the bomb yield was reduced to only 50 Megatons in order to prevent a "nuclear fallout" that would result. Only one bomb of this type was built and tested on October 30, 1961, in the Novaya Zemlya archipelago...
You're not in a particularly favourable position to accuse someone of being a hick. Your grammar is brutish, simple, and idiotic. In addition, your use of the numeral "2" in place of the word "to" is incorrect, as is your lack of capitals and punctuation. It would appear that you are the less intelligent party here. The youtube user that posted this video saw that the track "Falling Away from Me" by Korn was a suitable soundtrack for video footage of atomic blasts, which means that they're
Those rockets are obliterated before they can usually hit the ground, but I misread what you said too, I thought you said a Nuclear Bomb was just a rocket built to form a mushroom cloud, because thats where I thought you were wrong
Russia holds the record for the worlds biggest nuke ever tested. It was called the Tsar Bomba and it's yield was 100 mega tons. I think the biggest one we ever had was like 30 or 40. But don't quote me.
The same person who can appreciate the technical aspects that these things had to overcome to even get to production. You can thank these guys for giving you the microwave and clean nuclear energy.
Perhaps but the sun has the power to give us energy for at least one billion years, nuclear energy is dangerous, disasters like Chernobol are inevertable. Microwaves alters food making it dangerous for humans to consume.
Wow you seem credible in the statements you write. Instead of insults why not something that might contradict me, oh thats right you are the real retard and dont have shit to say.
Why don't you start by telling me how microwave radiation alters food in a harmful way. It's just electromagnetic radiation, the same as visible light, but on a lower wavelength. Microwaves don't even come close to the frequencies needed to alter and destroy cellular structures that x-rays and gamma rays do (gamma are emitted during fission reactions). All that microwaves do is interact with water in food, causing it to vibrate at a high rate, thereby generating heat.
Microwave oscillate at 2450 million cycles per second (MHz). Although microwaves do not have enough energy to be ionizing, they can be dangerous. If microwaves cook beef, these waves will have the same effect on human tissue if exposed to high enough intensities for a long period of time. U.S.S.R did some research into microwaves. Russian workers are required to wear special goggles any time they are temporarily exposed to a microwave radiation level of 1 milliwatt per square centimeter.
Very good! 2.4 GHz. Cordless telephones operate at higher frequencies. Microwave ovens are harmless. Intensity is defined by amplitude, not frequency. A 1000W microwave oven is perfectly benign.
ANY RF will "cook" or burn from inside out...Don't belive me? touch a 2-way radio antenna while transmitting. This is not limited to microwaves people. A 600Mw Microwave can burn you too so can a 5 watt CB radio in a car. RF cannot become ionizing either if it did we would not have TV stations or radio stations safly operational today. Ask ANY RF technician about being burned.
Mutually assured destruction is the only reason we haven't had an all out nuclear war yet. That's why it's important that religious nuts don't get these weapons because they will believe their God will protect them from retaliation and detonate it.
I've been studying Atom Bombs for quite a while now. I'm 15 but I know some stuff aboutt hem. How they work is, they explode in the air, and eacha tom explodes along with them making a chain reaction. What if that chain reaction never stops?
well, its possible if the scientist get the CO5MC11O3E93 mix of atoms wrongs to the slightist mill frac, if theres just 0l.0003 in stead of 01.0002, they can and will be a infinite chain of hell. yes, i know the exact ingreated to a nuke and it not just pluto and uran but i cant give the most inportant ingred. out.
it is not possible to have a never ending chain reaction, there isnt enough fissle material to support an infinite chain reaction. Even with a Hydrogen bomb that uses Fusion, there just isnt enough material in the weapon to maintain a continuous reaction, so dont worry.
i now this for s fact if you use the L10 readings from AR6987543 method of possible reactions, i know that a nuc=ke can have a never ending chain of desturtion, i know this for a fact.
mutual Assured Destruction or otherwise label as "Nuclear Deterrent" is what keeps the world going. It states that if one country initiates a nuclear stike against the other nuclear power, they will retaliate with their full arsenal on each other, to make sure that each country is destroyed. Now take note that USA and Russia both have enough nuclear weaponry to destroy the earth at least 7 times over each. So if this were to ever happen that would be the end of mankind as we know it.
@thechase83 the've done tests even if we we blew every nuke on the planet at the same time the earth would recover. Thinking we can destroy the planet makes it seem like we have such a big ego.
the nuke served its purpose and we should have a coly made put in a extramly high security vault and keep it there and dismantil all nukes and put more money towards our deffences against the threat and if we are in a lot of trouble only make three nukes named death, destruction, and torment because that is what is does and if we ever use them think and think about what the effects will be if useing such a powerful device
all nukes are weak, it cannot even destroy earth, destroy! destroy! destroy! yeah..!!!
all human scientist are not genius it cant even destroy the earth, i dare you all scientist to make super nuke that can destroy earth it will be the best's man's work ever..!!!
go die you fucking reject..... people have lives... just cause you don't you want people to make up a bomb to blow up the earth? thats fucking retarded.... your retarded... fucking emo go cut urself =/
nukes are the only reason the US and Russia didnt start world war 3. For as bad as their potential destructive power is so far it has only been potential.
All you liberal flower children need to look at how much death and destruction world wars one and two did to europe and imagine that happening to san fransisco, russian T-80 tanks rolling through the rubble of your homes the next time you speak out on the evils of the mutually assured destruction scenario. ;)
russians would not move in until fallout is gone and everything would radioactive leaving no reason to invasion plus MAD was just us showing the world how to throw a tantrum about being nuked
Education? are you serious? if you would like i could email you the 75 page paper i wrote about these types of weapons and their destructive power. I am not advocating the killing of innocent people, but i do admire the scientific breakthroughs that developing these weapons cause. No doubt you know that a large protion of your everyday life depends on the techonolgy that came from these weapons.
Excuse me children...H bomb...thermonuclear weaponry...ground zero is 2MILLION degrees in a flash...no radiation...it will...make iraq glass...avoid the oil fields...we need them...then carpet bomb up and down the venezulan (spell check) coast and steal their oil...kill any resistance...or use the old rule of "kill them all, let god sort them out later"
im pretty sure thousands have not been dropped on for test lol. anyways i was wrong that 100 would kill the earth. im just saying that if there was a world war 3 involving alot of nuclear bombs. PROBABLY most of us would be dead by now
wow nukes are terrible. your basically holding the power of the sun. the sun contains nuclear and so do nuclear bombs. Nukes should not be used on this planet. if 100 were used..... human kind would be extinct
i dont know, nukes and the explosion is cool at first, but its sad that so many people could lose there lives from 1 bomb, its kinda weird and scary too, like dipenquin said
It is sad that only nukes can prevent US invasion. If Saddam had had one, 750 000 people would not have been killed in Iraq just for oil. I bet millions of Russians live only thanks to their nukes.
Honestly i never meant to start a blog about this, but in the end "fighting like real men" is what the people without power say to the people with power. It doesnt matter if you think they are weak b/c they will kill you faster than you kill them. It is whoever is left standing after the war that is the victor.
yeah but bullshit wars like iraq its stupid and if u.s. did launch a nuke at them that would just show how weak the country is because the army couldnt fight worth shit and thats why people launch nukes
i think it has something to do with presure and consentration of the explotion, it´s hot so it´ll rise. think of it as a water comming out of the sink upside down...
it´s hard to belive that something that brute, destructive and hiddious can be beautiful at the same time...
Pfft. No. The bloody Tsar Bomba, largest nuke ever built had a fireball of 5 miles. First and second blast zones 30-40 miles. That was the worlds BIGGEST nuke. Most modern nukes, even with an even-pattern MIRV dispersal could cover *MAYBE* 20 miles in primary and secondary waves. Nukes are not magical ponies or dragonballs.
i love nukes. it shows that i have a nuke and if you try somthing smart like fireing one at me just remember you'll have about 5 coming right back at ya.
The Tsar bomb was only detonated at half strength, and it's mushroom cloud rose 10 miles high, and 8 miles wide. It vapourized 20 million tons of dirt.
Thumbs up if you like NUKES!!!!!
anthonydg894 5 months ago
wtf.....i thought that was the sun O_o
SuperSniperBEAST 10 months ago
this is WHATS gonna kill us all were all gonna nuke each other
wtf9171275 2 years ago
What's the name of the bomb displayed @ 2:13?
Patrissimo47 2 years ago
@Patrissimo47
Soviet nuke, called the Tsar Bomba...the largest, most powerful nuclear weapon ever detonated, and currently the most powerful explosive device ever created.
the bomb was originally designed to have a yield of about 100 megatons of TNT (420 PJ); however, the bomb yield was reduced to only 50 Megatons in order to prevent a "nuclear fallout" that would result. Only one bomb of this type was built and tested on October 30, 1961, in the Novaya Zemlya archipelago...
Insane really..
Burgoyne 2 years ago
imagine shooting a nuke into a tornado :D
ilumirothnati 2 years ago 2
into your ass would be funier :P
pilsvern 2 years ago
That...is the most amazing thought...in the history..of ever...
CaptainFF 2 years ago 3
That would be awesome. It would make an uber tornado!
thejon128 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
why this tribute only some hick would be this retarded 2 post this video
mastaODI56 2 years ago
You're not in a particularly favourable position to accuse someone of being a hick. Your grammar is brutish, simple, and idiotic. In addition, your use of the numeral "2" in place of the word "to" is incorrect, as is your lack of capitals and punctuation. It would appear that you are the less intelligent party here. The youtube user that posted this video saw that the track "Falling Away from Me" by Korn was a suitable soundtrack for video footage of atomic blasts, which means that they're
CaptainFF 2 years ago 2
(cont'd from first comment) very intelligent, musically speaking. You however, are an idiot.
CaptainFF 2 years ago
LOL should of added unfitting music, it makes u laugh like crazy! XD
angelica319 2 years ago
Feelin' Love - Paula Cole
CaptainFF 2 years ago
07darjac what the fuck you talkin about
moneylord07 2 years ago
at 2:45 what are the streaks to the right of the fireball
sintetsu 3 years ago 3
They are just rockets fired to measure the mushroom cloud.
laetrille 3 years ago 5
ah nifty, thanks
sintetsu 3 years ago
Wrong buddy
ColumbusFire14 3 years ago
ok let me hear the right answer, dont just leave a blant message.
laetrille 3 years ago
Those rockets are obliterated before they can usually hit the ground, but I misread what you said too, I thought you said a Nuclear Bomb was just a rocket built to form a mushroom cloud, because thats where I thought you were wrong
ColumbusFire14 3 years ago
It might of been flares shot up to show where to drop the bomb for testing. But that's just my guess.
thejoker766 2 years ago
What is the name of this music? It totally rocks!
zaiuswasright 3 years ago
I have it. It is Korn "falling away from me". It goes perfectly together I think.
zaiuswasright 3 years ago
Not really. Right now they're actually in the lead. Not like it matters anyway, we both can destroy the world 10 times over.
SPT6767 3 years ago
Correction, the russians have the most destructive bombs, the americans are more accurate.
ind0ctr1n3 3 years ago
Russia holds the record for the worlds biggest nuke ever tested. It was called the Tsar Bomba and it's yield was 100 mega tons. I think the biggest one we ever had was like 30 or 40. But don't quote me.
SoundsofExile 3 years ago
Which in essence was just what I said ;]
ind0ctr1n3 3 years ago
Wrong it was only 50 megatons
laetrille 3 years ago
tzar bomb was 50 megatons, they couldnt do the 100 megaton for some reason. dunno why theyd need to, the tsar bomb got the point across haha
sintetsu 3 years ago
dude this stuff is nuts!! freaky too!
bikeseat22 3 years ago
truels beautifull
CptSPAM 3 years ago
Coming soon to a country near you.
You want be watching this shit on youtube we will be living it.
The world econmony versus the current food shortages. If money is of less value how can we afford more food?
Survival=War.
bemorecarefull 3 years ago
2:37 is the most affecting
Maxxamaxx 3 years ago
Was that an underground nuke test?
Jesse21685 3 years ago
yes
Maxxamaxx 3 years ago
must be hot and very uh load
sharingundragon 3 years ago
what kinda fool makes a tribute about things that can whipe out all of us...
Allblack25 3 years ago
The same person who can appreciate the technical aspects that these things had to overcome to even get to production. You can thank these guys for giving you the microwave and clean nuclear energy.
thechase83 3 years ago 2
Perhaps but the sun has the power to give us energy for at least one billion years, nuclear energy is dangerous, disasters like Chernobol are inevertable. Microwaves alters food making it dangerous for humans to consume.
laetrille 3 years ago
You are either really retarded, or misinformed. Either way, shut up.
GrandPooba1024 3 years ago
Wow you seem credible in the statements you write. Instead of insults why not something that might contradict me, oh thats right you are the real retard and dont have shit to say.
laetrille 3 years ago
Why don't you start by telling me how microwave radiation alters food in a harmful way. It's just electromagnetic radiation, the same as visible light, but on a lower wavelength. Microwaves don't even come close to the frequencies needed to alter and destroy cellular structures that x-rays and gamma rays do (gamma are emitted during fission reactions). All that microwaves do is interact with water in food, causing it to vibrate at a high rate, thereby generating heat.
GrandPooba1024 3 years ago
Microwave oscillate at 2450 million cycles per second (MHz). Although microwaves do not have enough energy to be ionizing, they can be dangerous. If microwaves cook beef, these waves will have the same effect on human tissue if exposed to high enough intensities for a long period of time. U.S.S.R did some research into microwaves. Russian workers are required to wear special goggles any time they are temporarily exposed to a microwave radiation level of 1 milliwatt per square centimeter.
laetrille 3 years ago
Very good! 2.4 GHz. Cordless telephones operate at higher frequencies. Microwave ovens are harmless. Intensity is defined by amplitude, not frequency. A 1000W microwave oven is perfectly benign.
GrandPooba1024 3 years ago
Have you seen the video where a phone pops some popcorn??
laetrille 3 years ago
ANY RF will "cook" or burn from inside out...Don't belive me? touch a 2-way radio antenna while transmitting. This is not limited to microwaves people. A 600Mw Microwave can burn you too so can a 5 watt CB radio in a car. RF cannot become ionizing either if it did we would not have TV stations or radio stations safly operational today. Ask ANY RF technician about being burned.
Peonygreenleaf 3 years ago
Mutually assured destruction is the only reason we haven't had an all out nuclear war yet. That's why it's important that religious nuts don't get these weapons because they will believe their God will protect them from retaliation and detonate it.
Shrawty 3 years ago
I've been studying Atom Bombs for quite a while now. I'm 15 but I know some stuff aboutt hem. How they work is, they explode in the air, and eacha tom explodes along with them making a chain reaction. What if that chain reaction never stops?
bojieee 3 years ago
THen that would be bad, obviously. However the atoms that are splitting are Uranium and/or Plutonium which are in a finite amount in the weapon.
thechase83 3 years ago
well, its possible if the scientist get the CO5MC11O3E93 mix of atoms wrongs to the slightist mill frac, if theres just 0l.0003 in stead of 01.0002, they can and will be a infinite chain of hell. yes, i know the exact ingreated to a nuke and it not just pluto and uran but i cant give the most inportant ingred. out.
rsfreak22 3 years ago
what does a never ending chain reaction mean??
Mutual assured destruction??
laetrille 3 years ago
yea, pretty much...
rsfreak22 3 years ago
it is not possible to have a never ending chain reaction, there isnt enough fissle material to support an infinite chain reaction. Even with a Hydrogen bomb that uses Fusion, there just isnt enough material in the weapon to maintain a continuous reaction, so dont worry.
thechase83 3 years ago
Theoreticaly it is possible to create a "never ending chain reaction".
laetrille 3 years ago
nothing inpossible...
i now this for s fact if you use the L10 readings from AR6987543 method of possible reactions, i know that a nuc=ke can have a never ending chain of desturtion, i know this for a fact.
rsfreak22 3 years ago
mutual Assured Destruction or otherwise label as "Nuclear Deterrent" is what keeps the world going. It states that if one country initiates a nuclear stike against the other nuclear power, they will retaliate with their full arsenal on each other, to make sure that each country is destroyed. Now take note that USA and Russia both have enough nuclear weaponry to destroy the earth at least 7 times over each. So if this were to ever happen that would be the end of mankind as we know it.
thechase83 3 years ago
@thechase83 the've done tests even if we we blew every nuke on the planet at the same time the earth would recover. Thinking we can destroy the planet makes it seem like we have such a big ego.
Twismyer 1 year ago
or is this Korn?
CaptainFF 3 years ago
is that Criss Angel singing?
CaptainFF 3 years ago
the nuke served its purpose and we should have a coly made put in a extramly high security vault and keep it there and dismantil all nukes and put more money towards our deffences against the threat and if we are in a lot of trouble only make three nukes named death, destruction, and torment because that is what is does and if we ever use them think and think about what the effects will be if useing such a powerful device
dude13797 3 years ago
i think this is how all life will end. Nuclear war.
mglabontefan 4 years ago
if we get nuked...were fucked...
paintba114life321 4 years ago
nukes are definetly badass!
CaptainFF 4 years ago 3
Amen
killerpenguin2 3 years ago
we need napalm back!
screwballz2 4 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
all nukes are weak, it cannot even destroy earth, destroy! destroy! destroy! yeah..!!!
all human scientist are not genius it cant even destroy the earth, i dare you all scientist to make super nuke that can destroy earth it will be the best's man's work ever..!!!
zudunow 4 years ago
go die you fucking reject..... people have lives... just cause you don't you want people to make up a bomb to blow up the earth? thats fucking retarded.... your retarded... fucking emo go cut urself =/
KaoticLycan 3 years ago
yeah..!!! lets blow up earth, destroy destroy destroy,,, yeah i love it..!!! plant bomb on earth, i love it.!!!!
zudunow 4 years ago
SO MUCH ENERGY AND Power......
direc4u 4 years ago
radio: point was that if nukes didn't exist what would russia have had to lose by invading?
devinhallsworth 4 years ago
nukes are the only reason the US and Russia didnt start world war 3. For as bad as their potential destructive power is so far it has only been potential.
All you liberal flower children need to look at how much death and destruction world wars one and two did to europe and imagine that happening to san fransisco, russian T-80 tanks rolling through the rubble of your homes the next time you speak out on the evils of the mutually assured destruction scenario. ;)
devinhallsworth 4 years ago 7
russians would not move in until fallout is gone and everything would radioactive leaving no reason to invasion plus MAD was just us showing the world how to throw a tantrum about being nuked
radioactiveshoes 4 years ago
how can you pay tribute to this??Go watch THREADS and get an education
soupdragon1973 4 years ago
Education? are you serious? if you would like i could email you the 75 page paper i wrote about these types of weapons and their destructive power. I am not advocating the killing of innocent people, but i do admire the scientific breakthroughs that developing these weapons cause. No doubt you know that a large protion of your everyday life depends on the techonolgy that came from these weapons.
thechase83 4 years ago
I want a nuke..... to drop on korn
JDK1981 4 years ago
KORN is the gayest band ever
Ignantredneck 4 years ago
i own a nuke
dish6969 4 years ago
yeah and guess what the moon is cheese, bull crap is what I say to you
piratedude47 4 years ago
but i would have used TNT by AC/DC it just matches better i think
lock554 4 years ago
i agree
dish6969 4 years ago
im glad you made this because now i dont have to do it thx
lock554 4 years ago
NUKES HARNESS THE POWER OF THE SUN, THE TRUE GOD OF THIS WORLD.
btw nice vid but terrible song =)
pill1pill2 4 years ago
kool tune/power of Thur
icetrout 4 years ago
i say our brains the most powerfull weapone we make the weapones
riflelord2 4 years ago
i enjoyed that . id say the boys in those planes could toast marsh mellows off some of those big bangs. scary shit
micka20085 4 years ago
Excuse me children...H bomb...thermonuclear weaponry...ground zero is 2MILLION degrees in a flash...no radiation...it will...make iraq glass...avoid the oil fields...we need them...then carpet bomb up and down the venezulan (spell check) coast and steal their oil...kill any resistance...or use the old rule of "kill them all, let god sort them out later"
MakeIraqGlass 4 years ago 2
why stop with just iraq?
icetrout 4 years ago
sorry homer i ment lildevil
jimboandgetsmashed 4 years ago
homer i woldnt bring anti matter up it does exist an people are stupid enough to start toying with it
jimboandgetsmashed 4 years ago
@KYLEX4245: F U stupid american! if u nuke iraq, there is no way to steal the oil! and that is the actual reason for this war
strani 4 years ago
hey fuck you it would stop a endless freaking war
KYLEX4245 4 years ago
strani-lick a pigs ass savage-sandnigger!!!usa top of the foodchain!!!
icetrout 4 years ago
Nobodies ever going to use nukes, because it will bring about MAD (mutuial assured destruction).
carpet9999999999 4 years ago
This is nothing. Anti matter is way more powerfull and if used it would destroy anything.
antimatter + matter = anihilation. Then E=MCsquared. i.e. one hell of a big bang
LittleDevil0071 4 years ago
to quote Albert Enistein "i dont know what world war 3 will be fought with but i know wut world war 4 will be fought with sticks and stones
HomerSimpson180 4 years ago
Albert enistein
HomerSimpson180 4 years ago
man kills man, all for what? land? fuck nukes. . .
MagixReborn 4 years ago
respond to kylex4245 if we nuke iraq then russia and north korea will nuke us
respond to flubber dubber it would take less nukes to kill the earth 3 on the U.S. would set it back 200 years in techonlogy.
161023 4 years ago
i say we should nuke iraq to end the war just like what we did to japan in world war 2.
KYLEX4245 4 years ago
If people think that nuclear bombs look phalic then that's just immature
LordJWA 4 years ago
I love friggin Nukes...they give a sense of power...And an option
DarewhanDuex 4 years ago 2
What? Stop lying, I personly know that your are very found of cock's and not Nukes.....
BosnianCrook 4 years ago
...Go find ur self a corner, do ur job and let us Humans be'..Animal from hell...And its called tob be "Fond" of something
DarewhanDuex 4 years ago
tob be? what the fuck is that....? you are right it is fond of, my bad..... but that dosen't change the fact that you like cock more then nukes....
BosnianCrook 4 years ago
thats so fuckin cool every terroist should see this vid so they no not to fuck with america
lovemyguns1 4 years ago
im pretty sure thousands have not been dropped on for test lol. anyways i was wrong that 100 would kill the earth. im just saying that if there was a world war 3 involving alot of nuclear bombs. PROBABLY most of us would be dead by now
flubberdubber 4 years ago
wow nukes are terrible. your basically holding the power of the sun. the sun contains nuclear and so do nuclear bombs. Nukes should not be used on this planet. if 100 were used..... human kind would be extinct
flubberdubber 4 years ago
the long term devistation aside, nukes look awesome.
BlueTallAndUgly 4 years ago 2
i dont know, nukes and the explosion is cool at first, but its sad that so many people could lose there lives from 1 bomb, its kinda weird and scary too, like dipenquin said
toymachine11861 4 years ago
It is sad that only nukes can prevent US invasion. If Saddam had had one, 750 000 people would not have been killed in Iraq just for oil. I bet millions of Russians live only thanks to their nukes.
Lebedev2 4 years ago
"Victory goes to the side, that plasters its enemy with fire"!.Erwin Rommel.
TRIDENT666888 4 years ago 2
Honestly i never meant to start a blog about this, but in the end "fighting like real men" is what the people without power say to the people with power. It doesnt matter if you think they are weak b/c they will kill you faster than you kill them. It is whoever is left standing after the war that is the victor.
thechase83 4 years ago
yeah but bullshit wars like iraq its stupid and if u.s. did launch a nuke at them that would just show how weak the country is because the army couldnt fight worth shit and thats why people launch nukes
lilpablo69 4 years ago
dude the tsar bomb was onley the biggest bomb EVER TESTED
modern US nukes can be up to 100x that. im talking about wiping small countries off the map
SGTmojo 4 years ago
yeah flipyflaps since ny is only like a couple hundred miles wide
avarice8542 4 years ago
Where do you gett all those clips?
RockerOfDeath 4 years ago
It is from a video called 3D atomic bomb movie: Trinity and Beyond, i got it on ebay
thechase83 4 years ago
This is the PERFECT song for this video. I dont know why, but I think its great.
Pyroeagle7 5 years ago
why do they drop the pop any way?
Craft2299 5 years ago
i think it has something to do with presure and consentration of the explotion, it´s hot so it´ll rise. think of it as a water comming out of the sink upside down...
it´s hard to belive that something that brute, destructive and hiddious can be beautiful at the same time...
pippinNL 5 years ago
OH that band never knew they sang the song
flubberdubber 5 years ago
The band is called Korn. Cool video.
t239 5 years ago
what is that band called??
flubberdubber 5 years ago
one of those can completley dimolish new york city
flubberdubber 5 years ago
wow, our modern day nukes can go well over 65 miles, new york, and the rest of the fucking state.
flipyflaps 5 years ago
Pfft. No. The bloody Tsar Bomba, largest nuke ever built had a fireball of 5 miles. First and second blast zones 30-40 miles. That was the worlds BIGGEST nuke. Most modern nukes, even with an even-pattern MIRV dispersal could cover *MAYBE* 20 miles in primary and secondary waves. Nukes are not magical ponies or dragonballs.
DennisCost 4 years ago
i love nukes. it shows that i have a nuke and if you try somthing smart like fireing one at me just remember you'll have about 5 coming right back at ya.
jumpacliff2 4 years ago 2
hell yea usa all the way
nick8874 4 years ago
Yeah, mutually assured destruction paradigm is probably the only thing which kept the cold war so cold.
sEweron 3 years ago
The Tsar bomb was only detonated at half strength, and it's mushroom cloud rose 10 miles high, and 8 miles wide. It vapourized 20 million tons of dirt.
DavidG101010 4 years ago 2