ugh...denial. the problem is that when VH announced a new album and songs, youd expect something big. these new tracks are a let down. plus its not VH without mike. VH was a band NOT just the last name of 2 brothers
It doesn't surprise me that Hagar is hating on this. He sounds like a butt-hurt little bitch. I'm glad Dave is back where he belongs. Micheal Anthony would complete the picture for sure.
Do people not realise just how many bands go through their old demos or bring songs from sessions from previous albums, the stones did it, the beatles did it, U2 do it and the list goes on ..... !
@way2faded wow you can write tabs? what are you like 10? if you can't hear that it's the same song but reworked then YOU have the horrible ear for music
@mrmusicrocks1 Exactly. Besides, this was never released on a VH album so they probably just didn't think it was ready for the studio treatment until now. Then they tweaked some stuff to make it better & BOOM we have Tattoo.
I think Tattoo is actually pretty fucking awesome! It definitely picks up from where they left off in 96, and it sure kicks the crap out of Van Hagar! They still got it!
@killthedead23- I agree. All of you stubborn assholes who say they are ripping us off! WTF? No one is MAKING you buy their music. If you hate it, please, just don't buy it. I heard it the first time and found it a little different from their past releases! It's quite bluesy, but I gave it a chance and now, no surprise, I can't keep myself from listening to it.
I DO want more music like PANAMA, POUNDCAKE, DREAMS, RUNNING WITH THE DEVIL, JAMIE, HOT FOR TEACH and ect., there is hope! no doubt! :)
@pigeonpsycho no, this was tattoo when it actually ROCKED and would have made a good single..they took Down in Flames, took the balls out of it and made it tattoo
This sounds like more VH, then the new Single.. lol I would have rather heard remixed and re-recorded old stuff then modern thrown together crap on the wall from a record company producer. Whats up with Ted Templeman? Can't we get this guy back to produce another VH album?
@ebayisajoke This is almost the exact same song. From what I have read that is all they did was rehash old demos from ages ago with new lyrics. Now if someone could please tell me wtf Mousewife to Momshell means??
Really eddie van halen u sit on ur ass for over decade and claim u have all this music and the first single is a riff u did over 30 yrs ago good job eddie!
@leland5150 And exactly what the fuck have you been doing with your life for the last 10 years? Oh, that's right -- trolling on YouTube flexing your fucktard muscles. I'm sure Eddie et. al. will lose sleep over what the fuck you think.
@leland5150 Geez....always got to be someone bitching. And if they would have used 100 percent all-new material, then there would have been bitching related to that. They can't get any closer to the "old" Van Halen than what they did with the new album. After all.... that IS what the fans wanted, right? The old Van Halen? Or as close to the old as they could get to, anyway.
ugh...denial. the problem is that when VH announced a new album and songs, youd expect something big. these new tracks are a let down. plus its not VH without mike. VH was a band NOT just the last name of 2 brothers
dvinmf 1 month ago
I love shot down in flames
vanhalenfanforever1 1 month ago
It doesn't surprise me that Hagar is hating on this. He sounds like a butt-hurt little bitch. I'm glad Dave is back where he belongs. Micheal Anthony would complete the picture for sure.
skyg0d 1 month ago 2
Do people not realise just how many bands go through their old demos or bring songs from sessions from previous albums, the stones did it, the beatles did it, U2 do it and the list goes on ..... !
TheGibson5150 1 month ago
If you seriously think this is the same song as the new single, you have a horrible ear for music.
I could write out the tabs for most of the main guitar riffs, all of the bass and drums.
but hey we cant all be winners, nice try tho....damn trolls everywhere!!!!
way2faded 1 month ago
@way2faded wow you can write tabs? what are you like 10? if you can't hear that it's the same song but reworked then YOU have the horrible ear for music
quibb666 1 month ago
Ted Templeman would be the last producer Ed would go looking for, I bet he'd take Beau Hill over Ted
Tonechase 1 month ago
I like both songs but I think Tattoo is a little better. It just seems more, for lack of a better word, developed.
maalbe987 1 month ago
@maalbe987 because tattoo is basically this reworked
mrmusicrocks1 1 month ago
@mrmusicrocks1 Exactly. Besides, this was never released on a VH album so they probably just didn't think it was ready for the studio treatment until now. Then they tweaked some stuff to make it better & BOOM we have Tattoo.
maalbe987 1 month ago
I think Tattoo is actually pretty fucking awesome! It definitely picks up from where they left off in 96, and it sure kicks the crap out of Van Hagar! They still got it!
killthedead23 1 month ago 2
@killthedead23- I agree. All of you stubborn assholes who say they are ripping us off! WTF? No one is MAKING you buy their music. If you hate it, please, just don't buy it. I heard it the first time and found it a little different from their past releases! It's quite bluesy, but I gave it a chance and now, no surprise, I can't keep myself from listening to it.
I DO want more music like PANAMA, POUNDCAKE, DREAMS, RUNNING WITH THE DEVIL, JAMIE, HOT FOR TEACH and ect., there is hope! no doubt! :)
MileyLeax911 1 month ago
Will the real Tattoo please stand-up...This blows Tattoo away 100x!!!
deathontwolegs1961 1 month ago
this is a copy of tattoo
pigeonpsycho 1 month ago
@pigeonpsycho no, this was tattoo when it actually ROCKED and would have made a good single..they took Down in Flames, took the balls out of it and made it tattoo
vendboygreg 1 month ago 2
Doesn't sound anything like Tattoo at all.
kyliehammill49 1 month ago
This sounds like more VH, then the new Single.. lol I would have rather heard remixed and re-recorded old stuff then modern thrown together crap on the wall from a record company producer. Whats up with Ted Templeman? Can't we get this guy back to produce another VH album?
ebayisajoke 1 month ago 3
@ebayisajoke This is almost the exact same song. From what I have read that is all they did was rehash old demos from ages ago with new lyrics. Now if someone could please tell me wtf Mousewife to Momshell means??
lobmo 1 month ago
@lobmo Mousewife- a housewife that spends a lot of time on the Internet. Momshell- a MILF.
theNewCruelty 1 month ago
Really eddie van halen u sit on ur ass for over decade and claim u have all this music and the first single is a riff u did over 30 yrs ago good job eddie!
leland5150 1 month ago 7
@leland5150 And exactly what the fuck have you been doing with your life for the last 10 years? Oh, that's right -- trolling on YouTube flexing your fucktard muscles. I'm sure Eddie et. al. will lose sleep over what the fuck you think.
CaribbeanLounger 1 month ago
@leland5150 Geez....always got to be someone bitching. And if they would have used 100 percent all-new material, then there would have been bitching related to that. They can't get any closer to the "old" Van Halen than what they did with the new album. After all.... that IS what the fans wanted, right? The old Van Halen? Or as close to the old as they could get to, anyway.
1325ACO 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
They used this riff for the new song "Tattoo".
So cool!
johnnybeane 2 months ago
I've loved this and the Osaka version for years. Really hope there's some outtake or demo that'll finally see the light of day!
Jmurray5150 1 year ago 3
It's ridiculous that this tune never made it to an album. I think it's great. The total spirit of early VH is captured here.
pepper123 2 years ago 3
@pepper123
Funny how things go. It's the first single of the new album.
scriptphase 1 month ago in playlist More videos from video64