Watch a Real Controlled Demolition, 9/11 Truthers

[belowthepovertyline]

Wow, look at all that dust! Hey Judy Wood, are you watching?

[Garet93K]

this is just my personal opinion on the matter

[Garet93K]

here is the difference between this controlled demolition and the world trade centers. this demo is on a building that is wider than tall, where as the world trade centers were tall and fairly skinny. if you watch a controlled demolition of a hotel building it shows it does the exact same thing the wtc did when it "collapsed". sorry but i believe that 9/11 was a government conspiracy to invade the middle east for their vast amounts of oil.. i am not disrespecting the victims at all.

[ifeelfine90]

Also. This buildings structure is different. The twin towers had a massive core colum that in no way should have completely vanshied. No matter how hot that fire was to make the floors magicaly "pancake", the colums would have been normal strength the farther they got from the fire; even IF the fires had weakened them in any way. So OP is still a dumb ass giving no evidence for their arguement.

Go figure.

[jazzfan5000]

@ifeelfine90 The core column did not completely vanish, it collapsed with the rest of the building. You, and the rest of your truther buddies, seem to forget that two jets hit these buildings. The ipact of these jets compromised the strength of the structure.

[ifeelfine90]

@jazzfan5000- Your arguement neglects the fact that fire is said to have caused the global collapse of the twin towers. If you say it did, but the impacts were major factors as well, you must forget about building 7. Which is understandable because everyone else, like you, that believes the main stream media report avoids this subject like the plauge. Do your research, and come back when you appriciate the entire situation. And not just the bits and pieces you choose to mention.

[kaskadaks]

Argument from authority and personal attacks. That's 911 debunking in a nutshell.

[psmtheman]

Um... where was the pancake from the world trade centers? Its a physical impossibility for the floors to pancake on top of each other and not slow down.. Each floor has a force acting on it keeping it from moving. Each floor would cause all the other floors that hit it to slow down. They would not be able to fall at the rate that they fell with the current laws of physics. They would not be able to fall at that same rate of speed with out actually ACCELERATING through each other.

[lamiac2411]

There are different types of controlled demolitions. I remember watching a 9/11 documentary in where they showed about 6 different buildings being destroyed by controlled demolition and they put the wtc buildings collapse side by side and u couldn't even tell a damn bit of difference. So the only thing this video proves is that the maker is an idiot. I am sure he thinks this proves something and I am sure in his mind he feels like he is the ultimate debunker. Nope, just a dip shit

[ifeelfine90]

I don't remember seeing fireworks on any of the other controlled demolition videos i have seen. Poor choice for reference.

[rbl777]

@ifeelfine90 rofl nice

and yeah this video is obviously terrible. not like there is ONE single way of controlled demolition..

[Origin305]

yeah about the same results. Collapses into its foot print at almost freefall speed

[stratocaster539]

So this was a real demolition.Well done.The charges are obviously rigged differently here but its useful to compare the huge amounts of phraetic clouds and the collapse times which are similar.The kinking of each roof section is pretty telling also.The way it fall into it's own foot print too is nicely demonstrated.Good comparison.

[MrKoenig1985]

Top To Bottom Demolition:

watch?v=VZ1E2NPl-s8

Fu***ing liar!

[thehipsterofnewyork]

How about you compare the Building 7 collapse? Why don't you show it? The towers were a top to bottom demolition, not this type. Building 7 was a bottom to top.

[PeaceIsRad]

Americans, for those of you that after alllll these years and alllll the evidence that still don't wrap your heads around the facts of the wtc towers being demolished I actually feel sorry for you. The game is over. Time to WAKE UP and smell the bullshit. What is REALLY happening here???

You're a slave, nothing else....and you'll continue to be until you realize that taxes, media, church and military are raping you of your freedoms. You're a human being G*d dammit...your life has value!

[DarkwingScooter]

So what you are saying is that because THIS demolition looks nothing like the 9-11 collapses that no demolition looks like 9-11.

Even if this were the case (which it is not), it would STILL not disprove demolition.

The only, and I will say this again: the ONLY way to disprove demolition is to prove that natural collapse is plausible, short of that you are living in cloud cookie land if you think you have debunked anything.

[aspinelli8123]

That is actually a cool demolition, with the fireworks. I want to see one.

[Str8JacketMafia]

There are different types of controlled demolitions. That specific building was being steered away from either a road or an area where the debris rubble would obstruct or damage another building. Research the different styles of demolitions prior to jumping to conclusions.

Dumb ass.

[WayofChaos]

ok, who ever posted this video is just plain retarded! that building is in no way shape or form the same as the twin towers! different buildings require different means to bring them down, not all demo's have to look the same in order to be demo's you stupid fuck! however it does look like the building that went down later that day WTC 7! why don't don't you use your computer for something other than porno and fornication jackass!

[TheSkepticalIdealist]

how about you find a demolition anywhere that uses thermite and where molten pools were left behind. Good luck with that

[WayofChaos]

did i say anything about thermite? how about you find a fire hot enough to weaken steel and concrete in a building as big as WTC 1,2,7...good luck with that!

[TheSkepticalIdealist]

WayofChaos, so you saying that Thermite didnt bring the buildings down? Because thats what your heros say happened. Unless you're a Space Beam supporter. The only concrete in the towers was in the 4inch thick floor pans. That is not a reinforced concrete building.

[WayofChaos]

yeah but concrete by itself is fire resistant! if you know anything about construction you'd know that floor pans or "pan decking" as we call it ,is pretty heavy gage stuff. not to mention all the "I" beams in-between each floor and spaced properly for the pan decking. also all of the specialized trades equipment, HVAC, Plumbing, Eletrical and so on. For being as tall as the are, they'd have to be reinforced, for the very reason they supposedly fell! Planes crashing into them!

[TheSkepticalIdealist]

WayofChaos , you arent understaning the only concrete was in the 4" thick floor plans layed on the decks and they werent reinforced. The WTC was basically steel bolted together like an erector set. What we know is that reinforced concrete steel structures hold up much better to fire than steel alone. If it has a concrete core in addition like the Widsor tower in Madrid even better. All the steel collapsed but the concrete remained.

[WayofChaos]

I don't think you understand, at the core of the building it was a combined steel and concrete structure, 87 ft by 135ft. both buildings had 47 steel columns running from the bedrock (underground) to the top of the towers. not to mention floor trusses are welded and bolted together.

[TheSkepticalIdealist]

WayofChaos, do you deny that the WTC was not a reinforced concrete structure and all the truth movement comparisons ARE? Or, that they have concrete cores, or.. that the steel collapsed, or that structural engineers believed the building on fire was at risk of a pancake collapse anyway? Do you deny any of that?

[WayofChaos]

i'm having a hard time trying to read your jumbled comments so i'm gonna tell you "again", what i believe! i believe the WTC buildings were reinforced to withstand wind, earthquakes and yes planes! WTC 7 only had fires on two floors, it wasn't gonna go down anyway because no plane hit it! i believe the government knows more than they are telling us and don't tell me otherwise because politicians lie for a living, it's their profession! that's what i believe!

[TheSkepticalIdealist]

WayofChaos, no the WTC was not a reinforced concrete structure. They were not designed to take the impact of a 757. They were designed to take the imapct of a lost 707 low on fuel. Leslie Robertson said they did not factor in fires into the equation. And since you are are fucking no planer a kind of truther despised by most other truthers, I have nothing more to say to you.

[WayofChaos]

Do you know anything about the truth movement at all? WTC 7 "again" was not hit by a plane! that building was the smaller one (47 stories) that fell later that day! despised by other truthers, are you serious? how old are you? because you sound like a lost child who'll believe anything he's told by the Mainstream media and not look it up for himself! it's not just 9/11, it's Waco, it's Oklahoma city, it's all these wars being fought over nothing!

[WayofChaos]

You're just a fucking follower, exactly what your government wants you to be! don't ask any questions and we'll lie to you to get our way, you're a good little sheeple!

[TheSkepticalIdealist]

Continue to be the most dispised kind of truther there is, even by other truthers.

[w0bbl3r]

funny how the moronic truthers can bring the rating down to 3-odd stars on a video of CD?

what is there to rate badly? they rate it badly because it doesnt fit, thats all.

fucking morons. give them video evidence like this, and they just dont believe it.

id like to see the video evidence of CD from the top of a 100 story tower, and thermite used for CD, because i cant find those anywhere.

perhaps because, as miss piggy here says, "its just not possible" to use thermite for CD

[Skeptic121]

WTC7 was too perfect to have been a controlled demolition. They could never have timed it to drop all at once like that. The closest demolition to WTC7 was the Landmark Tower, and it was less than half the size of WTC7. No building the size of WTC7 has ever been demolished in a CD.

[DanishFlames]

how did it collapse then?

it werent hit by a plane or anything.

WTC 7 was controlled demolition.

Search Barry Jennings and listen to his testimony

[Skeptic121]

If WTC7 was too good for a CD then it was definitely too good for fire and debris damage.

I don't know WHO or HOW; I just know that the explanations we have been given for WTC7 are unsatisfactory. If that makes me a "twoofer" then so be it.

[DanMorgan98]

Liberal Lunacy? The 9/11 conspiracy is primarily a conspiracy of the Extreme Right Wing comprised of current and former John Birchers.

[w0bbl3r]

and can you PLEASE tell me of: a) one other instance where thermite has been used for CD, and: b) how thermite OR explosives can keep temps going for weeks after felling a building. go on, even imaginary CD with thermite; does it keep fires raging for weeks? give me one instance of these temps recorded at ANY CD site in history. just one. c;mooon. i only want one. no? then your temperature argument disproves your CD argument, right? your whole argument here is the temps in the pile, right?

[brown55061]

Thermite would not be used in demo because they want to explode something, not just weaken it. This was the use of military grade gel packs.

The fact is the towers were built to withstand an airliner impact and to support TEN TIMES its supported weight, even after being impacted. So your entire argument fails due to simple math and science.

The thermite reaction, if keep underground, could burn at molten metal temps (1500*+) for weeks if isolated as it was. Science is right, you are wrong.

[w0bbl3r]

they were designed to take an impact from a much older, smaller aircraft, weighing nowhere near as much as the 767's, and they assumed the plane would be lost in fog, and travelling at minimum airspeed.

there is a HUGE difference, and the designer of the towers is on record as saying this.

and you CANT cut an upright column with thermite. it doesnt defy gravity you know.

industrially thermite is used for binding railroad tracks, and nothing more

[w0bbl3r]

so, what youre saying, is that they placed explosives there to drop the buildings?

but they ALSO placed extra flammable material there to make it burn hotter around the impact area?

bring some common sense next, mmkay

[brown55061]

Incediary thermate does NOT need office desks or chairs to burn hotter. It is a chemical reaction by design and burns at nearly 2000*. Hydrocarbons DO NOT BURN THAT HOT PERIOD. It's simple science.

[w0bbl3r]

hmm, maybe it was that last one, fuel based fires raging uder the pile for weeks, eh?

[w0bbl3r]

and its IMPOSSIBLE for these temps under the pile?

so it happens all the time in CD?

no it doesnt.

nothing other than fire burning, with the concrete duts acting as insulation, keeping the heat inside, with the steel girders (being hollow as they were) acting as chimneys could have cause heat like that.

what are YOU claiming did it?

thermite? thermite cant be used to drop buildings this size.

CD? HOW THE FUUUU???? comeon. and initial CONTROLLED series of explosions caused fires?

fuel based fire?

[brown55061]

Why cant THERMATE be used to weak core columns? It absolutely could drop that building, in fact it would be faster and easier than explosives and require less materials. Chimneys too? HAHAHAHA

You debunkers are hilarious. All I've heard is blah blah blah Im a dirt tramp that cant read a science book. Have a nice day...in DENIAL.

[w0bbl3r]

NASA has thermal imaging of a floor by floor temp layout.

and thermite cant be used to fell buildings. in an industrial way its only used to fuse railroad tracks together.

it has never ever been used for CD.

its not stable enough.

and certainly not viable that you could plant hundreds of thousands of tons of it without anyone noticing, in all 3 buildings

[opivy2]

Wanna tell me where you got your facts that thermite has only been used to fuse railroad tracks??

[w0bbl3r]

from looking up industrial uses for thermite.

and i also studied whether it can be used for dropping buildings and it cant

[KimmoKuopio]

twoofers smell just like hippies

[WhyAskQuestions]

Truthers are like squirrels. They're nuts!

[Airportris]

well first of all this demolished building is not the same size in anyway as the wtcs, so there for cannot be compared, the trade centers are huge and for them to fall perfectly like they did along with the speed, its just simple math, and go ahead TRY N DEBUNK MATH fuckin 9/11 deniers, n its funny they call people who want the truth , truthers, ur basically saying we know the truth n u believe the fake story,

[brown55061]

WTC7 wasn't 50 year old technology, it was built in 85 with enough strength to withstand total annihilation. Everyone forgets that the towers had many fires thru the years but didn't collapse. Buildings around the world have had MUCH worse fires and didn't collapse, and they weren't built half as strong as WTC7. It was like a skyscraper pentagon. If even the landlord says they pulled it, why would anyone deny it was a demo? Beats me!

[Wulfen73]

Umm Brown where exactly did you get this information? lots of fires? were these fires fueled by jet fuel?, is a fire equal to a fully loaded 747 smashing into the building? and which still standing buildings had fires that severe? I would love to see your information sources, it would assure me you aren't just making stuff up

[brown55061]

YouTubers should pay attention to the date comments were posted...

Your science thoeries stink. A plane smashing into a building is serious, fire is not. Steel would require a steady 1800* fire, which is impossible from wood, paper and office equipment with hydrocarbons. Not to mention that giant fireball on impact was 98% of the fuel burned off immediately. 5 minutes after impact folks were yelling for help from the impact holes. I dont think an 1800* fire consumed them.

[thousandlegger]

there's more than one way to skin a cat.

[CoverFireHero]

Watch a top-down controlled demolition of a skyscraper and it looks identical to what we saw on 9/11.

[WhyAskQuestions]

"But you can find over 500 at ae911truthDOTorg"

You mean the 500+ lies from AE911Truth*org?

[Airportris]

thats how ignorant you are, ur name is why ask questions? wat are u a nazi? u will be a perfect citizen for the new world order.. lol why ask questions, that sir is the stupidest question ever

[WhyAskQuestions]

"You Sir, need to do more research because you dont know"

And if you don't like what I said about the steel being comprimised at 1800* F then you better look it upon the net. I know more than you would ever know.

[WhyAskQuestions]

"WTC7 fell into its own foot print."

Then explain why there's damage to the 2 buildings that were around WTC7. Bet you can't!

It didn't fall in its own footprint.

[brown55061]

Actually it did. Does anyone think a controlled demo can stop buildings with 100 feet of it from having damage? This was a 47 story building. All that steel cant just fall into the basement, some will spread out at the base. That's just common sense.

[WhyAskQuestions]

"No they don't."

That's kind of odd because I think those French brothers that had a camera in the lobby of the WTC's heard firfighters talking about the bodies crashing to the pavement when they looked out the windows and saw them. Firefighters even said about the blood splattered on the windows where the people jumped.

You lost Truther!

[WhyAskQuestions]

Don't you Truthers know that a demolition can be heard up to 1/2 a mile away when the explosives go off?

Noone on 9/11 heard explosives going off from 1/2 a mile, even from across the river.

Busted and debunked!

[thousandlegger]

if i could find you i would slap you smartly. and i dont really believe in violence. it would just be fun.

[fake2]

It has been said there would be not be so many loud explosions if Thermite or Thermate was use in conjunction with conventional bombs. But the sounds of explosions were heard on the Hoboken pier in New Jersey

[Focoist911]

Looks like WTC7 collapse. But NIST finally released a report in WTC7 after 7 years. They concluded that one column failed from mild fires due to a phenomena called thermal expansion. Just this one column brought down the entire WTC7 in symmetric free-fall. Normally they need to plant thousands of cutter-charges. be careful - a localised mild office fire can call a total free-fall implosion of a 47 story building!

[WhyAskQuestions]

"Steel is affected by temperatures exceeding 2900-3500 degrees."

It only takes 1800* F to make the steel soft.

"The firefighters stated that they did hear explosions."

And they'll tell you that it was the bodies from the people jumping from the building. Nice try though!

"Three skysrapers coming down freefall unto their own footprint perfectly is impossible."

They didn't fall into their own footprint. Look at the pictures you blind bat!

[Focoist911]

"And they'll tell you that it was the bodies from the people jumping from the building. Nice try though!"

No they don't. There are 113 independent testimonies of eplxosive events, flashes running around the towers like in a controlled demolition. These testimonies are in the 9/11 First Responders Testimonies. They were supppressed by the NYNJ council until August 2005 a Court of Appeals forced their publication. 9/11 Commission simply ignored all of them.

[Focoist911]

"They didn't fall into their own footprint. Look at the pictures you blind bat! "

WTC7 fell into its own foot print. Let me give you a fact: You won't find a dozen engineers or architects who have publicly support NIST's reports. But you can find over 500 at ae911truthDOTorg profressional degreed career architects and engineers who have denounced NIST and concluded it was controlled demolitions, explosives which brought them down. These people put their careers on the line. END OF STORY.

[Focoist911]

"It only takes 1800* F to make the steel soft."

UL were contracted by NIST to recreate the conditions of the fires and test the steel beams. They didn't even weaken. UL concluded that the fires alone couldn't explain the failures, let alone the failures of the 80 floors below which didn't have fires. What did NIST do with the UL report? They ignored it, even though they had contracted UL to tell them. The entire investigation was a fraud. You Sir, need to do more research because you dont know

[zohar52]

The firefighters stated that they did hear explosions. Three skysrapers coming down freefall unto their own footprint perfectly is impossible. K-1 kerosene a.k.a jet fuel burns, at best at 1700 degrees with ventilation. Steel is affected by temperatures exceeding 2900-3500 degrees. Good try Jimmy!

[WhyAskQuestions]

According to thousands of New Yorkers they didn't hear demo charges going off.

Firefighters that were standing next to the WTC didn't make any statements reguarding demo charges or even hearing of a charge going off. They did make a statement that the bodies that were hitting the pavement sounding LIKE explosions.

Millions watching on TV didn't hear any demo charges going off.

So that tells me that what you've said Wobbler is total and utter bullshit!

[Focoist911]

"According to thousands of New Yorkers they didn't hear demo charges going off."

Do you have this list do you? The 100s of firefighters and first responders who did hear and see explosions tried to submit there witness to 9/11 Commission. All their testimonies were ignored and suppressed from public knowledge until August 2005.

[Focoist911]

"Firefighters that were standing next to the WTC didn't make any statements reguarding demo charges or even hearing of a charge going off."

There were 113 such testimonies of bother seeing and hearing explosions at the base and lower parts of the towers. These were recorded in 9/11 First Responders interviews. David Griffin has critiqued it. These testimonies were suppresed by the state of NYNJ until 2005 August a citizens Court of Appeals case forced their release. The 911CR ignored them.

[Focoist911]

"Millions watching on TV didn't hear any demo charges going off."

Mostcameras were zoomed in from a very long distance away. Many cams use condenser mics. They don't pick up explosions as you might imagine. It sounds like white noise, especially when hundreds are going off, and plus these were mostly thermate cutter charges - not like conventional cutter charges.

Live reporters at the base, "A huge explosion now raining debris down on all of us, WE BETTER GET OUT OF THE WAY!!!!"

[ReasonOfAbortion]

Rosie needs to backhand Elizabeth with a cinderblock. Elizabeth represents the Yo-joe! side of ill logic and standard dumbass rations given to most citizens, while rosie represents the "don't have to listen to her because she's ugly" side. Rosie had a point here.

And yes, WT7 collapse looked a lot like that. Though, I don't remember the decorative fireworks.

[w0bbl3r]

there were none of the HUGE POUNDING EXPLOSIONS in the fall of WTC7, either. watch any vid of a controlled demo with sound, the noise is unmistakeble, and would have been on every peice of film, and would have been in EVERY eyewitness account.

im not talking about the odd person hearing something "that sounded like an explosion", im talking about a long burst of HUGE MOTHERFUCKING EXPLOSIONS THAT EVRYONE FOR A MILE AROUND WOULD HEAR.

go ahead and find vids on here with sound of demo drops

[darcyknox]

Fog Of War.....I'm sure you'll jump on the bandwagon when main-stream media reports on it as a fact....they still act as if tonkin atually happened for god sakes... farthest they'll go is say "gulf of tunkin may have not happened" and the articles resources will have the ACTUAL declassified report from the government itself.

[Lennytaylor101]

Keep your head in the sand James... (you might also think the world is still flat) it would sound better there

[jd24717]

By believing this nonsense, you've put your head in the sand.

[Lennytaylor101]

Sorry friend but I'm aware of whats going on in the world and we are not even told half of the truth. 911 was a flase flag operation designed to pin blame on an enemy. It was not the first case either. Pearl Harbour was also used to garner support for the americans to join the war. There is so much more you can find out.

[soulismissing]

no point in even arguing with this tard...your vid is for a demo, thats true ..i can point you 50 others that look just like WTC7....one demo does not prove a point

[tventers]

Official version zombies, what is even the point in controlled demolition if all you need to do to take down a building is start a few fires on a few floors and BHAM, it will vapourise into a nice little pile on the floor. ? whats that you say? wtc7 had massive damaged to it? a 1/3 of its southern faces taken out?? show me any video of the damage wtc7 had recieved.

[streakingcameraman]

/watch?v=Afb7eUHr64U&feature=r­elated

[skinsknot1]

oh great here we fucking go....the wtc 7 card! Ok you contradict your fellow twofers who say the WTC was too strong to be taken down by plane! now youre saying that it was taken down by charges that took 45-50 minutes? 2nd of all wtc 7 was left to burn because let me put it in simple terms for you "bigger fish to fry" (aka deaths of 2,000 people in Tower 1 and 2 collapse) and they didnt fight through the dust for a worthless building in comparison. twoofer zombie

[darcyknox]

well they were fighting the fire and fire fighters said they dont understand why it went down when they could have easily put the fire out.

[w0bbl3r]

no, they DIDNT say that.

they said there were extreme fires, and the look from outside indicated an immense blaze.

but besides that, the fact is that steel is over 50% weaker at under 1100 degrees. and there were huge impact areas where the supports were severely damaged and even shorn away.

it was NO surprise it fell, and it was being reported that they may fall, up to 20 mins earlier.

and WTC7 had FDNY saying "its going to fall, there is no way to stop it", half an hour before collapse.

[brown55061]

Steel's tensile girth is NOT 50% weaker under 1100*. Where did you get that info? Not to mention the fires weren't that hot anyway. If they were there would not have been hundreds of survivors from the impact floors, or people able to call for help from the impact holes.

I dont buy everything the truthers or NIST say but if you just look at science and fact, the buildings should not have come down by design. There had been fires and planes hit the towers before and they didnt collapse.

[w0bbl3r]

steel is 50% weaker at about 1050 degrees. temps recorded averaged 1300, and were as high as 1800.

do your research

[brown55061]

Research? LOL The initial blast may have been 1050* but hydrocarbons can't burn steadily at 1000* w/out a solid state fuel source. Therefor it's impossible for office desks, and paper to burn at 1800 degrees. Bring real science next time mmmkay?

Temps measured by who, and where? If there was a fire that hot it was not from jet fuel. It had to be from additional incendiaries. The collapse site burned at 1600 for nearly a month. IMPOSSIBLE from hydrocarbons. Science says you are ignorant. =\

[w0bbl3r]

temps measured by NASA for one.

where did you get YOUR temp measurements?

[brown55061]

The thermal images taken from the NASA satelite cameras did show those temps AFTER the collapses, but those images were taken long after the collapse so nice try again.

[Wulfen73]

Easily put a fire out? at the heights the fires were at? at the heat of the flames? water would just evaporate before getting close, if it can get to that height at all

[avd007]

this is a fucking fireworks display. wtc was blown up with thermate. it doesnt make big fireworks, thats why they used it... whoever they are...

[Sam420Son]

another weak ass video :( so sad, does this reallly convince anyone? what a waste of time. how many controlled demolitions have you scene? building 7 was a controlled demolition obviously anyone with 2 or more braincells can look at that building and deduce that.

[jd24717]

You know what I love? When people say "It looks like a controlled demolition. Therefore, 9/11 was a giant conspiracy."

...really?

[Sam420Son]

is that what they say?u love that huh?lol, yeah really, wake up,or just keep watchin americas got dookie and smellin your own farts, the only conspiracy is that a handfull of radicals masterminded the attacks'counting on NORAD standing down,cause they wouldve had to)then leavin passports and bags with all theyre plans for everyone to see,la de da de da, keep watchin your fox news, and livin in your fox hole, with your head in the sand and your ass popped up towards the sky for the NWO to have

[jd24717]

No, you wake up.

You've been brainwashed by conspiracy nuts far more than I have been brainwashed by Fox News.

[Lennytaylor101]

I bet you have not even seen all the real evidence. I bet you think Dubbya has your best interests in mind too.... hah hah hah hah hah hah ahha haaaaaaaaa ohhhhh thats great

[jd24717]

The burden of proof is on you to convince me of your claim that it was a controlled demolition.

Why are you laughing? If I believed what you believed, I'd be pretty damn serious.

[Hrothulf19]

1. Molten metal pouring out of towers could not have come from plane crash/fire.

2. You can see the explosive charges in youtube videos search for "WTC Flashes"

3. Rosie is right, if the towers were weakened by fires and crash, they would not have collapsed straight down so fast, they had to be weakened below.

4. Smoke rises from Basement of towers in video.

5. 130+ witnesses to 9/11 saw/heard/felt explosions, again, some in videos on youtube

6.Whitish smoke pouring from towers away from impacts

[jd24717]

You need to wake up.

[tannerkish616]

FUCK THE BRITISH

[2Good2Waste]

That looks exactly like building 7 coming down. Hmmmmmm, interesting.

[ianscottbally]

It's not liberal. It's not conservative. It's money and power. After the 9/11 attacks, the 93 WTC attacks, and the Oklahoma City bombings the gov. got big helpings of both.

[thinazzabird]

This is the truth. They aren't all dogs. Cynthia Mckinney tried to stand up to them so the capitol police, a legally castrated entity, were put up to roughing her up at the gates of the House. The Feds have worked the island banks and left a couple around so the senators and congressmen may still put away the crumbs they're tossed by lobbyists and real-life bogeymen of the Executive with real-life scary death-toys. They write the laws but they don't write their own dignities, having none.

[riceowlex]

James a question. How do you do a controlled demolition from the bottom up on a building that is 117 stories high? How do you do that and not have it look exactly like a controlled demolition? How do you explain that to the investigator about the surrounding buildings that you just crushed and all the additional people that were murdered? How do you explain the explosions that were heard by thousands of people. The cars that were burned beyond recognition for 1

mile in radius for the WTC?

[riceowlex]

How do you explain tritium there at all? How do you explain the molten steel in the basements of WTC buildings #'s 1,2 and 7(in a pancake collapse?) Jet fuel is crude kerosene.

It is nearly impossible to ignite unless compressed. You get a hotter flame on your gas stove. Why is it then that the grates on the stove don't lose structural integrity after every meal prepared on the stove? You've got work to do buddy. I lost three friends in that shit, I know what the fuck I'm talking about!

[kasperthe44]

if you go to the "popular mechanics" website, they have 10 pages worth of debunking all these weirdo conspiracy theorists.

[jd032906]

See that's where you are wrong. I have read it all, I've looked at all the websites trying to convince myself that there isn't anything "fishy" about what happened on 9/11. The people who don't want to think it could have been planned, just read a few things and say see, no way. They only pick and choose facts to support their theories, same as the other side. I don't know one way or the other, but neither beliefs add up all the way....now to me, that says something is very wrong!

[kasperthe44]

okaaay, and your point? you respond to comment i left 3 months ago just to tell me i'm wrong and your not sure. its nice you have such a high opinion of yourself. if you dont mind i have better things to do then bask at how insufferably satisfied you are with yourself. have a good life :)

[jd032906]

So because I can admit that I don't means I have a low opinion of myself?! I think if anything it means that I have a high opinion of myself because i can honestly say that I don't...in fact, nobody knows but claim they do...such as yourself. Its funny that you would even respond back...I guess people like you just can't handle being wrong. I'm glad I don't have that problem. Fuck off and die!

[kasperthe44]

cute response, there. so you have a high opinion of yourself because you have a low opinion of yourself???? riight. i guess your too broadminded to take your own side of an issue, huh?? seeing as how you want me to fuck off and die you might want to reevaluate your stance on whether or not you have a problem with being wrong. just sayin'...

[albertstenton]

And he is an Ann Coulter fan too. James1053 is under a dark, demonic powerspell.

[albertstenton]

James1053, you are under severe mind control. You have allowed those in control to steal your soul. Please get help and therapy.

[owensea777]

they didn't blow the building from the bottom up because they didn't want it to look like a controlled demolition! come on now

[dkirolos]

You make jokes about bigfoot but nothing about 9/11 is funny to me and if you were before me I would probably do something to get arrested.

You make me sick because people like you who are a minority at this point, give this so little thought and impede a real investigation.

At this point only the very stupid or corrupt believe the official story, which category do you fall in?

[james1053]

you wouldn't do a damn thing if you were in front of me. quit being an internet gangsta. you have no idea how the world works.

[zzbullan]

dont worry, we'd tell the police that your a truther and he'd black bag you for uncovering their secret government conspiracy

[dkirolos]

This is what you said

the point is that controlled demolitions collapse from the bottom. the wtc collapsed from the top down.

You now say something else after watching a video that shows just how wrong you are.

As a first responder who was there that day I have to tell you that there were many visible and audible explosions that are well documented in our oral histories.

[dkirolos]

I wonder if you are man enough to admit you are dead wrong - a search for user rushfan9thcmd for a video called BEAKING NEWS!! NEW TOP DOWN DEMOLITION!! - watch it and we will then see if what you are all about- you are either stupid or a liar start facing the facts

[james1053]

cool. i just watched it. not convinced. there were giant visible flaming explosions well before the building actually collapsed and it also fell with no debris flying 200 yards away like the WTC.

what's next, a video of bigfoot? go climb back into your treefort, kid

[dkirolos]

I would encourage all to see just how dumb this is by reading NOT watching what the characteristics of CD are and looking up the first responder testimonies of explosions.

N.I.S.T has said they cant explain it yet somehow you can based on this video as the answer to everything?

Juest search for top to bottom demolition and you will see how stupid James is.

[james1053]

the point is that controlled demolitions collapse from the bottom. the wtc collapsed from the top down.

that's great logic you have to ignore what real controlled demolitions look like and just blindly believe what conspiracy nuts say.

[dkirolos]

You cant be serious.

By your logic since the collapse of the WTC Towers 1&2 did not look like this instance of controlled demolition, it proves that the collapses of WTC were not controlled demolition.

[phalanx25]

If I said the things that the pig' Rossie said about fire melting steal I would want to be seen again for a long time ! "first time in history fire melted steal" where does she think cars come from, maybe she thinks they are mined in the side of a hill !

[Cozzmos]

Listen to what she says again. It was more to the affect of "the first time a steal building was brought down by fire." She did not come up with any of the comments she made on her own. She is quoting experts in various feilds. BTW, If I missquoted someone like that without knowing what the hell I was talking about... I wouldn't want to make another post in a long time :-O

[budtoken]

LMAO @ the retarded title. What a CONTROLLED demolition looks like. Go look up the word "CONTROLLED" ya fuckin brainiac.

[rod1575]

Who's to say you cant blow up a building from the top down. Either way its still controlled demolition.

[anaskewview]

theres actually an example of that on youtube now! this is AWESOME news, because it shows that buildings can be set off from top to bottom. just type in top-down demolition in the search and its the first one. its not a high rise building like the towers, but it shows it CAN be done!

[liverleef]

Not really, that building was what just a few stories? The reason why taller buildings have explosives set near the bottom is because the upper half of the building weighs so much. Why plant explosives all over a skyscraper when you can plant them near the bottom and then let gravity do the rest?

[civilgillman]

Was Rosie O'Donnell talking about physics? Science and Rosie go so well together.

[slmdj]

Trump said it best "What a PIG".