The "parallel postulate" is wrong. That is why there is no right angle in the fractal world. Go out into nature and find a right angle. There are none. Hence, there are no parallel lines. Einstein showed that gravity is actually curved space, meaning all space is curved.
@Mdeil20 complex numbers are mapped onto a Cartesian plane. Think of an infinite chess board. Perform a step by step move on the chess board, take the result then use that as the input and repeat until bound or infinite.
@deacumen Learn Linear Algebra, Abstract Algebra, Set Theory, Real Analysis, Complex Analysis then jump in. Number Theory is complementary. These are all semester courses in college.
great software, i used it on a 600MHz pentium about 10 years ago and it made great zoom videos, sadly it's near impossible to find a codec that'll play them right on anything these days..despite their being a then-standard avi....
I'm going crazy for fractal images. I'm not really good at math but I love art and I respect math as a very fundamental code of our reality. Good video!!!
This shape replicates so many other shapes in nature, the discovery of the shape is the work of a genius and will be key to discovering how the universe has formed over the 13.5billion years because many of the shapes represent galaxial structures and the emptiness of space.
Also, F(z)=z^2 +C, if F(C)=C^2 +C remains bounded, also F(0) remains bounded, since F(0)= C, F^2(0)=C, F^3(0)= C^2+C. So F^n(C)=F^(n+2) (0). So not only in every connected Julia set 0 is connected but also C is connected... Maybe it's a good starting point for proofing that "in every connected Julia set 0 is connected". I'll try this way! :D
@AndromedaChao2 I'm not sure of what plot means (in math at least (Yep, I'm a math student but I'm Italian :D))The Mandelbrot set is defined as Zc(n+1)=(Zn)^2 + C where C is the point where you apply this equation and Z0=0.
The Julia set is defined with the same equation F(Z)=Z^2 + C (you have to reiterate this) but in this one C is a given complex number and Z is the point where you apply this equation.
Now Z(0)=0, that means (using Zc(n+1)=(Zn)^2 + C) Zc1= C, Zc2= C^2 + C.
@AndromedaChao2 So we see that Zc2=F(C).So we see Zc(n+2)=F^n(C), this means that if Zc remains bounded (= is a black dot in the Mandelbrot set) F(C) also remains bounded, so his Julia set is connected. Basically it means that if you have a black dot in C=(a,b) in the Julia set generated by F(z)=z^2 +(a,b) the point (a,b) is a black dot.
Quick question for you. I've watched your entire series leading up to the Mandlebrot set and I think your videos are a great springboard into the discussion of the associated Julia Sets and how they lead to Mandelbrot. My only question is actually software related. How do you get the fractal eXtreme software to show both the Julia and Mandelbrot sets in the same window? Also, how do you get the cursor "chaser" that shows how the points escape to infinity or spiral to 0? many thanks!
Quick question for you. I've watched your entire series leading up to the Mandlebrot set and I think your videos are a great springboard into the discussion of the associated Julia Sets and how they lead to Mandelbrot. My only question is actually software related. How do you get the fractal eXtreme software to show both the Julia and Mandelbrot sets in the same window? Also, how do you get the cursor "chaser" that shows how the points escape to infinity or spiral to 0? many thanks!
fractal geometry is just the exhibition of infinite domain. You are really watching the exposition of chaos. Wow. So the first integer becomes compromised. This is what the narrator meas by saying fate. It is all bullshit.
I am a straight 20 student in math, on the 11th grade and i have no ideia of what you are talking about... is it worth for me to try understanding this or is it too complex for someone without a graduation?
@bcoolbrich WELL if you had of taken things serious ,you my have noticed that its not "math" ,its called maths! ,well i guess this is from a country ,that dov ,in to the swimming pool ,as opposed ,dived , OH DEAR ,where does one even start :)
Absolutely awesome ! I love maths and I saw all your videos about fractals. Please continue ! It's great. Your rubik's cube tips are CooOoOooOoOL too !
For certain numbers you can definitely show analytically that they must converge or escape. I dont know exactly what all of these regions are. But certainly this is NOT true in general. In particular it is not true for the regions we are most interested in ;) Complexity is elusive
Is it possible to determine whether a C value escapes to infinity by taking a limit of the iteration rather than sampling it over and over again and guessing?
for some special cases you can do that analytically, but in general you must almost always go through the iteration process to figure out the answer. And you ARE correct in classifying it as "guessing", because that is what it is-- we iterate a million times, trillion times, but that still doesnt technically provide us with the right answer, FOR SURE, in some cases. So for some points, it is indeed only the best guess. Good question.
Is there a way to set this up as a summation or series and test if it is convergent or divergent or is that totally unrelated? And if this were the case could it fail due to the complex numbers?
For example f(z) = Sum(X^2+C) from o to infinity
at f(0) and find if it is convergent or divergent could you see instead of guessing?
One last question, could you apply this to a three dimensional plane such as (x,y,i)? or even (x,y,z,i)?
Sorry for the VERY late response on this. I just noticed it now heh. Good questions, both.
1: Sum(X^2 + c) is NOT what it is computing here. The sequence is recursively defined. What you would want instead is to look at the asymptotic behavior of the sequence c, c^2+c, (c^2+c)^2+c, .... And yes you can do this analytically for some special cases. For example for |c| > 2
2: The Mandelbrot set does not easy generalize to 3D and there is some ongoing work on that. Its not a solved problem
oh my god, thankyou!!!
onlyguitar1001 3 days ago
The "parallel postulate" is wrong. That is why there is no right angle in the fractal world. Go out into nature and find a right angle. There are none. Hence, there are no parallel lines. Einstein showed that gravity is actually curved space, meaning all space is curved.
danno321s 2 weeks ago
to be honest i dont get the math. i just like to look at the pictures :D
Mdeil20 3 weeks ago
@Mdeil20 complex numbers are mapped onto a Cartesian plane. Think of an infinite chess board. Perform a step by step move on the chess board, take the result then use that as the input and repeat until bound or infinite.
danno321s 2 weeks ago
Wow!
FredGandt 1 month ago
You have a gift for explaining! Thank you so much!
nhmllr725 1 month ago
How can i see those julia sets in fractal extreme?
mkcactus 1 month ago
Thank you so very much for putting this out there :) <3
lurkern 1 month ago
You don't need to know all the specific mathematical details to be able to understand the concept. This is quite interesting I must say!
VentedGlitchMaker 2 months ago
yes, good stuff, this has helped me understand more. Thanks.
WhatYouWantInSpadez 2 months ago
In what mathmatics is this learned?
deacumen 2 months ago
@deacumen Learn Linear Algebra, Abstract Algebra, Set Theory, Real Analysis, Complex Analysis then jump in. Number Theory is complementary. These are all semester courses in college.
danno321s 2 weeks ago
@deacumen The classic text is "Fractals Everywhere" (now updated) by Michael F. Barnsley. I used this book in 1989.
danno321s 2 weeks ago
does this only works for f(z)=z²+c?
w4nt3d1000 2 months ago
@w4nt3d1000 No.
danno321s 2 weeks ago
Okay, I have fractal extream for a few months now, how do you get the real time trace of the iterations ?
time3space1 2 months ago
Finally after years I can now understand! Great video series, thanks for time spend on this!
decayer 2 months ago
@decayer Kudos!!!
danno321s 2 weeks ago
I think I love you!
greatsoccerman96 3 months ago in playlist More videos from fractalmath
@greatsoccerman96 love? does it give?
danno321s 2 weeks ago
Ok what is the formula for the mandelbrot set? F(z)= z^2+ ?
Kirklandkd13 3 months ago
@Kirklandkd13 F(z) = z^2 + C I think :)
greatsoccerman96 3 months ago in playlist More videos from fractalmath
@Kirklandkd13
F(z)= z^2 + i
Matthewsimplifier 3 months ago
great software, i used it on a 600MHz pentium about 10 years ago and it made great zoom videos, sadly it's near impossible to find a codec that'll play them right on anything these days..despite their being a then-standard avi....
JustSomePerson888 4 months ago
This is very helpful, thank you!!!
expandingvoid 4 months ago
Whit this explination we can say the univers it's trully a hologram?
vladissimo18 5 months ago
can my question please be answered
topbluffa1 5 months ago
I'm going crazy for fractal images. I'm not really good at math but I love art and I respect math as a very fundamental code of our reality. Good video!!!
Ozomness 6 months ago
That is so freaking cool.
Shalek 6 months ago
@Shalek So is your comment
lensip2 6 months ago
This shape replicates so many other shapes in nature, the discovery of the shape is the work of a genius and will be key to discovering how the universe has formed over the 13.5billion years because many of the shapes represent galaxial structures and the emptiness of space.
UntameDAnger 6 months ago
so does a disconected only exist within a connected fractor but never the other way around.
topbluffa1 6 months ago
thanks for this video , i cant comprehend maths ,but i seem to have an understanding ,of this infinite reduction haha :)
badslabber 6 months ago
May he rest in peace...
capefeather 6 months ago
thanks for this - always wanted to understand how fractals are generated, but didn't have the complex math background - now I do :)
kingluke2 7 months ago
beardyman brought me here...I dont know math...
AleksHyper 8 months ago 29
@AleksHyper amen sir. amen
trusta225 8 months ago
how do you make the white lines, that show where the point s go?
fireluigi12 8 months ago
fantastic video. well done.
wordsandcolor 9 months ago
It isn't hard. Look at formula, play around, and enjoy.
kizutsuku 9 months ago
So how do you work out the iterations for an (x, y) pair?
aNickzz 9 months ago
Also, F(z)=z^2 +C, if F(C)=C^2 +C remains bounded, also F(0) remains bounded, since F(0)= C, F^2(0)=C, F^3(0)= C^2+C. So F^n(C)=F^(n+2) (0). So not only in every connected Julia set 0 is connected but also C is connected... Maybe it's a good starting point for proofing that "in every connected Julia set 0 is connected". I'll try this way! :D
JohnThePetru 9 months ago
That's just... WOW
Thanks man!
JohnThePetru 9 months ago
Comment removed
guyj247 10 months ago
Great video man, so helpful!
guyj247 10 months ago
Is the Mandelbrot set the plot of all the C points that have connected Julia sets?
AndromedaChao2 11 months ago
@AndromedaChao2 good way to summarize! yes!
badmephisto 11 months ago
@AndromedaChao2 I'm not sure of what plot means (in math at least (Yep, I'm a math student but I'm Italian :D))The Mandelbrot set is defined as Zc(n+1)=(Zn)^2 + C where C is the point where you apply this equation and Z0=0.
The Julia set is defined with the same equation F(Z)=Z^2 + C (you have to reiterate this) but in this one C is a given complex number and Z is the point where you apply this equation.
Now Z(0)=0, that means (using Zc(n+1)=(Zn)^2 + C) Zc1= C, Zc2= C^2 + C.
JohnThePetru 9 months ago
@AndromedaChao2 So we see that Zc2=F(C).So we see Zc(n+2)=F^n(C), this means that if Zc remains bounded (= is a black dot in the Mandelbrot set) F(C) also remains bounded, so his Julia set is connected. Basically it means that if you have a black dot in C=(a,b) in the Julia set generated by F(z)=z^2 +(a,b) the point (a,b) is a black dot.
JohnThePetru 9 months ago
@AndromedaChao2 So yes, I think the Mandelbrot set is the all the C points that have connected Julia sets.
Dunno if any of these make actually sense and if I have actually answered your question, but I hope I helped!
Lol, I just saw the comment of badmephisto -.-
BTW, does anyone know how color are chose?
JohnThePetru 9 months ago
my brain hurts >_< trying to make sense of this
metallichika 11 months ago
One person has a Black and White computer screen! :)
birlibis2juggler 11 months ago 10
@birlibis2juggler use tones.
danno321s 2 weeks ago
Quick question for you. I've watched your entire series leading up to the Mandlebrot set and I think your videos are a great springboard into the discussion of the associated Julia Sets and how they lead to Mandelbrot. My only question is actually software related. How do you get the fractal eXtreme software to show both the Julia and Mandelbrot sets in the same window? Also, how do you get the cursor "chaser" that shows how the points escape to infinity or spiral to 0? many thanks!
lowed40 1 year ago
Quick question for you. I've watched your entire series leading up to the Mandlebrot set and I think your videos are a great springboard into the discussion of the associated Julia Sets and how they lead to Mandelbrot. My only question is actually software related. How do you get the fractal eXtreme software to show both the Julia and Mandelbrot sets in the same window? Also, how do you get the cursor "chaser" that shows how the points escape to infinity or spiral to 0? many thanks!
lowed40 1 year ago
This has been a very helpful video for me.
I've never known that there was such a relationship between mandelbrot and julia sets.
The concept of connected and disconnected is some food for thought :)
johanhendriks 1 year ago
im 39 and i feel like a cheese cake.
Nevawake 1 year ago
not connected ones make me feel happy.... the connected ones make me frustrated... dont know why...
Zookhaarh 1 year ago
i'm 17 and i feel incredibly stupid.
Avgen14126 1 year ago
Great presentation.
SpiritualAtheist 1 year ago
Could someone please explain 'zn+1 = zn2 + c' for me ??
QuantumLogic1080 1 year ago
Benoît Mandelbrot died 2 weeks ago -.-
ben1996123 1 year ago
wow! just wow! thanks for the lecture.
sivyig 1 year ago
MAN I LOVE YOU!!! such an expert teacher
77wii77 1 year ago
@77wii77
I wonder if there's a relationship between a person's knowledge and your love for them :P
johanhendriks 1 year ago
Great stuff. You are a very good teacher.
dleddy14 1 year ago
Didn't Matt Damon do a movie about this?
zeenon 1 year ago
fractal geometry is just the exhibition of infinite domain. You are really watching the exposition of chaos. Wow. So the first integer becomes compromised. This is what the narrator meas by saying fate. It is all bullshit.
TheAntiFascist2010 1 year ago
ay?
74andrewt 1 year ago
! ! ! ! !EXQUISITE! ! ! ! ! Thank you so much! I will be using your video as a homeschool project. Thank you, again.
veeveevenn 1 year ago
@veeveevenn awesome! good to hear :) cheers
badmephisto 1 year ago
If you want a fractal generator, download Xaos, its free software and it generate many sets
m598lmr 1 year ago
Actually, Fractal eXtreme isn't free. It's a shareware program.
denelson83 1 year ago
Indeed... indeed.
20secondsofawesome 1 year ago
please start uploading more vids both here and at badmephisto, seriously
fhellstrom 1 year ago
Wow great program! I tried to extract c values from Mandelbrot set and to generate Julia sets manually from them :wall:
Leonchemist 1 year ago
excellent video ! i understood everything you said, and i am very happy of having watched it.. keep it up!
schenonef 1 year ago
I am a straight 20 student in math, on the 11th grade and i have no ideia of what you are talking about... is it worth for me to try understanding this or is it too complex for someone without a graduation?
bcoolbrich 1 year ago
@bcoolbrich its not complex, you would just have to watch all of my previous videos too. Sorry for late reply :p
fractalmath 1 year ago 2
@fractalmath
It does use complex numbers though :P
but complex doesn't make it difficult, if that's what bcoolbrich meant
johanhendriks 1 year ago
@bcoolbrich WELL if you had of taken things serious ,you my have noticed that its not "math" ,its called maths! ,well i guess this is from a country ,that dov ,in to the swimming pool ,as opposed ,dived , OH DEAR ,where does one even start :)
kevrs2 1 year ago
@kevrs2 For a guy who's snobby about spelling differences between dialects, you sure suck at English.
Vivendium44 1 year ago
@Vivendium44 who cares what you think!
kevrs2 1 year ago
@kevrs2 Nobody, I'm sure. Nobody cares what anyone thinks on the Internet, so maybe you shouldn't be whining about people's grammar?
Vivendium44 1 year ago
@Vivendium44 OK :)
kevrs2 1 year ago
@bcoolbrich if you dont even have a vague idea of what he is talking about you clearly dont know shit about maths.
mpdp85 9 months ago
@bcoolbrich I was terrible at Maths and I understand exactly what he is talking about. Maybe there is pattern there.
philipjterry 8 months ago
@bcoolbrich im a 13 yr old 7th grade student and i understand everything :P
betbetsukbet 5 months ago
@betbetsukbet this coment is old, i understand it very well now. i just didnt watch the first video. so stop replying to my comment please, thanks
bcoolbrich 5 months ago
Thank you for these! Great videos, I finally have a clear idea how this all works together.
lpchiasson 2 years ago
I really enjoyed these...and the notion that so much complexity flows seemingly out of nowhere is fascinating. Thumbs up!
TellerWest 2 years ago
Comment removed
Mattprole 2 years ago
Absolutely awesome ! I love maths and I saw all your videos about fractals. Please continue ! It's great. Your rubik's cube tips are CooOoOooOoOL too !
DettwilerPictures2 2 years ago
programm doesnt work on macs eh?
JimmyGr90 2 years ago
I read on wikipedia that if the series for a point z ever has radius greater than 2, it will diverge.
Is there a corresponding fact for a radius under which no points will diverge?
If not, is there a record for the smallest radius achieved by a divergent point?
z3125 2 years ago
Good questions!
Yes and Yes.
For certain numbers you can definitely show analytically that they must converge or escape. I dont know exactly what all of these regions are. But certainly this is NOT true in general. In particular it is not true for the regions we are most interested in ;) Complexity is elusive
badmephisto 2 years ago
Comment removed
nhnt11 2 years ago
Are you badmephisto?? :)
Tortak39 2 years ago
in person
byorda 2 years ago
Is it possible to determine whether a C value escapes to infinity by taking a limit of the iteration rather than sampling it over and over again and guessing?
llamasownyou 2 years ago
for some special cases you can do that analytically, but in general you must almost always go through the iteration process to figure out the answer. And you ARE correct in classifying it as "guessing", because that is what it is-- we iterate a million times, trillion times, but that still doesnt technically provide us with the right answer, FOR SURE, in some cases. So for some points, it is indeed only the best guess. Good question.
badmephisto 2 years ago
Is there a way to set this up as a summation or series and test if it is convergent or divergent or is that totally unrelated? And if this were the case could it fail due to the complex numbers?
For example f(z) = Sum(X^2+C) from o to infinity
at f(0) and find if it is convergent or divergent could you see instead of guessing?
One last question, could you apply this to a three dimensional plane such as (x,y,i)? or even (x,y,z,i)?
Deluminator4 2 years ago
I definitely saw 3d fractals... I just dont know if there would be a mandelbrot set in 3d. probably not.
and yes. The sequence is simply:
0, c, c^2 + c, (c^2+c)^2 + c, ....
does that converge or diverge? :) I think that for special cases of c you can do this. (For example for small c values.) But certainly not in general.
badmephisto 2 years ago
Sorry for the VERY late response on this. I just noticed it now heh. Good questions, both.
1: Sum(X^2 + c) is NOT what it is computing here. The sequence is recursively defined. What you would want instead is to look at the asymptotic behavior of the sequence c, c^2+c, (c^2+c)^2+c, .... And yes you can do this analytically for some special cases. For example for |c| > 2
2: The Mandelbrot set does not easy generalize to 3D and there is some ongoing work on that. Its not a solved problem
badmephisto 2 years ago
oops actually i just see that i DID answer. And pretty much the same thing too. Haha sorry about that :) cheers :p
badmephisto 2 years ago
awesome math pattern. is the mandelbrot set defined by a function as well?
neurobact 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You have a very ornate way of speaking o.o who says z as zed if they are not from the UK o.O
Kakashinoor 2 years ago
Canadians
OrphanEater1 2 years ago
the usa is the only english speaking country who doesnt say z as zed
jesseliston 2 years ago
Pure awe
danieldrehmer 2 years ago
This is crazy.
xXdaveXsuperstarXx 2 years ago
wow! this is awesome!
fona24 2 years ago