Why males & females fight - Battle of the Animal Sexes - BBC Wildlife

[Badguy260]

it would have been interesting if there were more than 2 sexes in humans but i guess we well never know,poor dales

[CityLights452]

Wait... this doesnt make complete sense to me (I'm blonde so bare with me) So when someone says "What came first? The Humans or the egg" I say Egg? Since I guess sperm and eggs were made before humans were? Like is that wat it's saying? We all went from tiny cells to either sperms or eggs and then into people? AH! I need to dye my hair O_o

[AndromedaChao2]

What evidence is there for the evolution of the eggs and sperm in a speculation like this?

[Ch3sterB]

@AndromedaChao2 lol umad

[crazymodafuka1]

mmm rice crispys

[ScholarlySquirrel]

Well there ya have it, men have been cheating since nearly the beginning of life. No one they seem programmed that way.

[jashgen]

can anyone please tell me why the soon-to-be females grew larger?they said something about compensation to their mate's size....pls explain anyone

[chris7777777777777]

Fairy tale evolution?

[TheGongstar]

Now I know why us men are called cheats, lol!

[ma3indisalfa]

that does not make sense at all...........................­...... -___-

these are all assumptions and there are no facts to show that that actually occurred, let alone the "theory" of evolution, which is "still" a theory

[NinjaJedi]

@ma3indisalfa

Yet the alternative essentially boils down to "a wizard did it" and that isn't even grounded in reality let alone science.

[ma3indisalfa]

@NinjaJedi

lol, at least we agree that it is still not grounded in science and is still questionable. i would to post a link to a video which will give u a better understanding of why i posted my comment in the first place, but currently i am trying to do so and youtube does not allow it for some reason. so, please search the following in youtube for a better understanding of what i meant:

"Dr. Zakir Naik on Evolution and Concept of God"

[danielwhitman]

@ma3indisalfa your a moron you know that... seriously

[ma3indisalfa]

@danielwhitman

i am sorry to upset you but the facts they of in the video (i.e. natural selection and survival of the fittest) is still a hypothesis and not grounded scientifically.

i would like to post a link to two videos that would make it more clear to you why i am taking this stance about his video. so, please search in youtube following two terms:

1) Shaykh Yusuf Estes on Darwinism and Evolution Theory

2) Dr. Zakir Naik on Evolution and Concept of

[greenjelly01]

@ma3indisalfa Firstly, you will never understand all the evidence that is out there for evolution by natural selection. Still, these "hypotheses" as you call them, are far more plausible than a magic grand-daddy in the air who just "wished" everything into being.

[ScholarlySquirrel]

@ma3indisalfa Evolution is not a "hypothesis", it is a scientific theory. Also keep in mind that when I say "theory" I don't mean the everyday colloquial definition that means "speculation", I mean the scientific use of the word "theory" which means an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, testing and rationality - in other words, evolution is a theory deduced through fact. (The "Dr." Zakir Naik videos you recommended make this mistake)

[Crypton1989]

so thats where fat chicks come from... o.o

[JulinaAbecilla]

Fascinating...so men are just 'biologically programmed' to cheat, it's not their fault :P

[pvandi]

So the egg came first.

[iamsmalll]

mm this reminds me of the game spore

[AtomicDefcon]

lol he said sex drived midget

[allthiseverything]

he said "oversexed midgets"

[TKuja1]

Holy shit

[LickMyJunk]

My poor cheaters! They are dispatched.nightly (sometimes during the day) to their lonely fate in a tissue, sock or other article of clothing.

[Hellsconsort]

@LickMyJunk ahaha =)

[305pinoy]

whoa

[groovygamer69]

Interesting. Does this theory have a particular name? I would like to learn more about it.

[elevengiant]

me too, I have not heard of this from lecturers.

[camdenangel101]

Are you calling women fat?!?! lol

[thegardenislove]

OMG thats PORN lol

[foxmajik]

Because females don't know when to shut the hell up.

[optimisticbabe]

same goes with emo guys n gays

[TheMusicLover101]

Hmmm.. This is quite intriguing. So, at once there were more then two genders.. I completely agree, this makes actually a lot of sense.. But what if there are still more genders out there, that we are unaware of? It would be almost like aliens, yet we don't know. Since your universe is so large, but we don't have enough technology to find out.

[alex61761]

penguinistas, do you have evidence for your claim?

[spl0uf]

I doubt he does...

[penguinistas]

Actually you have it backwards. The burden of proof is on the producer of the video to present evidence to back up these absurd claims. Where is their scientific evidence? Did anyone actually see this happening? Anyone with the hardware and an ax to grind can make an animated video with wild claims but that's not proof (remember Piltdown man). If they even have one shred of evidence from the fossil record I'll be surprised, till then this remains a fairy tale like Hansel and Gretel.

[ScholarlySquirrel]

@penguinistas Creationists are STILL using Piltdown man as evidence against science and evolution? I mean, for one, it was immediately removed once it was discovered to be a hoax, for two it didn't change anything in the already established human evolutionary pattern, and for three, the damn thing was "discovered" in 1912. Have you done any research into the year of 1912? They didn't have much in the way of dating science or fraud testing back then. That shit could never be pulled off now.

[penguinistas]

@ScholarlySquirrel Stop whining about Piltdown

"immediately removed"????

it took them 40 years to discover that it was a fraud. It did not require advanced dating methods to discover the fraud. All they needed to do was actually examine the skull and jawbone which were mismatched and had very obvious filing marks on them. That's demonstrates that evolutionists are not vigorously examining the claims of their proponents, they are only drinking the kool-aid and confirming their bias.

[ScholarlySquirrel]

@penguinistas As I said, it was immediately removed ONCE IT WAS FOUND TO BE A HOAX (I capitalize this because apparently you stopped reading at "immediately removed" last time). And again, that kind of hoax couldn't happen again today. You're talking about a period between 1912 and the 1950s.

[penguinistas]

@ScholarlySquirrel

"ONCE IT WAS FOUND"???

It took them 40 years..... 40 YEARS TO ACTUALLY LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE AND SEE THAT THE TEETH WERE FILED FLAT TO MAKE THEM LOOK MORE HUMAN. You don't need carbon dating to see file marks!!!

And yes that kind of hoax can and still does exist because evolutionists are taught not to question it or look too closely. Tenured professors have been fired for raising questions about shoddy evidence. That's not science, that's a cult.

[ScholarlySquirrel]

@penguinistas Also... pretty sure it was you that "whined" about Piltdown.

[penguinistas]

@ScholarlySquirrel Stop whining about someone using Piltdown to show that evolutionists are a bunch of kool-aid drinkers. Stop whining as though it were unfair because it's not. Piltdown man is still is a perfect example of the lax and sloppy oversight within the evolutionist community. If a creationist were that lax and sloppy, evolutionists would use it against them. So I will continue to use Piltdown man to demonstrate that evolution is not and never was based in science.

[ScholarlySquirrel]

@penguinistas You seriously sound like an insane conspiracy theorist. Have fun making your tinfoil hats.

[penguinistas]

@ScholarlySquirrel You seriously sound like a mind numbed kool-aid drinking evolutionist because if creationists took 40 years to discover a very obvious hoax (by one of their own) they would never hear the end of it.

The documentary "Expelled no intelligence allowed" proves beyond doubt that even tenured professors who question the stated dogma will be fired for raising honest questions.

You can pretend that it's a non-issue if you want but that only makes you sound ridiculous.

[ScholarlySquirrel]

@penguinistas Creationists have taken over 2000 years and counting to discover a hoax, it's called the fucking Bible. You talk about "kool-aid drinking", take a look at your own cult.

[penguinistas]

@ScholarlySquirrel Changing the subject and name calling??? what a scholarly reply... I would expect that from a 2 year old.

The bible explains the fossil record and geological record better than evolution, but we weren't talking about creation (we were talking about evolution) and merely one example of it's many flaws (Piltdown man) and the fact that supposedly objective evolutionists took 40 years to discover a very obvious hoax, which speaks volumes about their critical peer review process

[penguinistas]

That is the biggest pile of B.S. I have heard in a long time. Evolutionists can't explain how to get 2 sexes out of single celled organisms so they have to make up fairy tales like this.  This fiction has no factual basis. This is pure myth!

[ZephyrPhoenix]

Different, but common CHROMOSOMES can create two different sexes. On one side, we have those with the XY chromosome and on the other side, we have the XX chromosome.

This is written in the DNA of the organism.

Also, if a hormonal influx of either testosterone or estrogen occurs within the species, that can affect the chromosome that dictates if the organism is male or female. Granted, this all can occur through a process called Natural Selection. Please go and study basic biology.

[penguinistas]

Here's a quote for you to chew on (or choke on):

These classical evolutionary theories are a gross over-simplification of an immensely complex and intricate mass of facts, and it amazes me that they are swallowed so uncritically and readily, and for such a long time, by so many scientists without a murmur of protest." (Sir Ernst Chan, Nobel Prize winner for developing penicillin)

[ZephyrPhoenix]

Also, I would like to point out that the two chromosomes that exist now, existed with thousands of other types of sexes. These two happened to only be attracted to one another, and after a few evolutionary changes, they became the dominant sexes through Natural Selection.

Of course, this is still speculation on our part, but we can understand and find out more by delving deeper into the genetic code.

[penguinistas]

and another quote:

"It is my conviction that if any professional biologist will take adequate time to examine carefully the assumptions upon which the macro-evolution doctrine rests, and the observational and laboratory evidence that bears on the problem of origins, he/she will conclude that there are substantial reasons for doubting the truth of this doctrine."

(Dean H. Kenyon, professor of biology at San Francisco State University)

What was that you said about studying biology again?

[conejolua]

thanks friend for this beautiful video

a warm greeting

Raul ...