Is The Bible Corrupted 2: The Beggining (1/10)

[Subways69able]

You don't have to believe them. It's all bullshit. All religions are bullshit/ Just made to give the poor, week, needy, disabled etc. Also to control people., To prevent uprisings. The bible isn't corrupted. It's straight up bullshit. It was written by man to begin with and has been rewritten by the christian canon countless times throughout history. All to suit their beliefs. Being written by man makes it bullhit in the first place. Also, god created the earth, roughly 6000 years ago? Bullshit

[Subways69able]

@Subways69able We have science now. Which proves otherwise. That the Earth is billions of years old. Not thousands. Anyone with an IQ of above 60 is a fool for believing the bullshit. It's like the bible was written by for children and retarded adults. God is an imaginary friend for adults and the bible is a fairy tale for adults. End of story

[seekingmystory]

@Subways69able NO!

The bible is an occult collection of some of the more esoteric works in the history of man. Most of these works were never meant to be taken literally. But those who chose to use the power in the works for their own political and financial power and wealth did so 2000 years ago to control the masses who 'believe'. End of story

[jonniec7]

kjv not corrupt.....humans corrupt........

[AdamsSeed]

This presentation fails on so many levels.

[rms16006]

Im gonna belive people who follow a pedophile(MUHAMMAD) and listens to voices in his head in a dark cave, annd followers dance around a fallen comet in mecca I THINK NOT.

[Plagueis1017]

Yes the bible was absolutely corrupted but this is in no way related to Islam meaning that you don't affirm your religion by debunking another religion. What did you honestly expect when you made this video? That people immediately drop to their knees and embrace Allah? just from the title of this video you would attract the attention of numerous critical thinkers most of whom are going to be just as critical of Islam as they are of Christianity.

[onelifegame]

ALL RELIGION IS A FRAUD



[1ALWAYZTHINKING]

LOL...THIS WAS SO FUNNY! ESPECIALY WEN U FIND HOW THE BIBLE ACTUALY CAME 2 B. EVERY ONE SHOULD KNOW WHO JESUS WAS AND CLAIMED 2 B. THERES SO MUCH PROOF! IM SO GLAD HE WAS NOTHING LIKE MOHAMEDS CHARACTER ON EARTH B 4 HE WAS "spiritualy" INFLUENCED 2 COME UP WIT THA QURAN...HIS CHARACTER COULD TEL U SO MUCH..WOW I MEAN SERIOUSLY I WONT MENTION THEM BUT I HOPE ALL WOULD LOOK UP SOME OF HIS NOT SO NICE "BELIEFS" INSEST AN MARRIAGE 2 CHILDREN LIKE WAT IS IT 5 YRS..1 EASY SOURCE 4 THESE S

[Plagueis1017]

@1ALWAYZTHINKING Um sorry to inform you of this, but that is not even an argument against the point being brought to the table. Its barely a reply. And sorry to inform you of this but yes the Bible was most definitely tampered with and changed. Especially the King James version which honestly the King James bible is a joke.

[blackfist585]

fake ass religion! lol all 3 of them lol!

[freethinker143]

your koran is just as manmade as the bible at Tafkeer Productions islam 2+2=5 christianity 2+2=3 but I still enjoyed your videos about the bible which of most of was true what next 4 u Is the Koran CORRUPTED

[hen8167]

@freethinker143 where is the quran corrupted? there is a quran from 1400 years ago that matches todays quran word for word.

[freethinker143]

your koran is just as manmade as the bible at Tafkeer Productions islam 2+2=5 christianity 2+2=3

[petion2010]

What was the first background music?

[thewayofsalvation]

whats the title of background music?

[darkmarkandthelight]

LIE #1...The "Roman Catholic Church" did not exist untill the great schism ca 1000 a.d. Why when ever I hear a muslim debate on the good Book, it is all truth out of context? also known as LIES??? The only difference between us, is I questioned MY bible, and you speak of blind faith, you worship the moon god

[hen8167]

@darkmarkandthelight this is not true. IT ACTUALLY existed not long after jesus ascention to heaven. Emperor constantine was the first so called "christian" emperor of Rome. He is the emperor who made christianity the official religion of the roman empire. Constantine presided over the council of nicea...this council was held because the christians were divided about the trinity ...some believed in a trinitarian godhead that included jesus as the son and some did not agree with this.

[freethinker143]

@hen8167 they were not only divided about the trinity there were many many more issues they were divided about and Constantine did not preside over the council he made sure that the bishops of the major cities did not leave undecided about the issues they were debating and voting on and to say he made it official implies that it was the only accepeted religion of the empire there were many more non christians in the empire he only made it aceptable

[hen8167]

@freethinker143 ok but the main issue was the divinity of jesus after the council of nicea ended ...NOBODY WAS ALLOWED to believe jesus was not god ...you had to accept the trinity ...they said it was illegal to not accept it. And the bishops who refused were jailed.

[thefotfoundation]

Phenomenal set of videos, highly, highly recommended, Excellent work Bros, May God reward you. Salaam, fot

[IThirst4Knowledge]

Hi ;0) Mohammed in history?

Of the Arabic rock inscriptions scattered all over the Syro-Jordanian deserts and the Peninsula, and especially the Negev desert neither the name mohammed itself nor a reference that he is the prophet of God appears in any inscription dated before the year 691 AD

[IThirst4Knowledge]

2 ;0) Neither the name mohammed itself nor a reference that he is the prophet of God appears in any inscription dated before the year 691 AD not even in the inscription at the dam near the town of Ta'if, built by the Caliph Mu'awiya in the 660s AD

[IThirst4Knowledge]

3 ;0) The religious content within the rock inscriptions do not become pronounced until after 661 AD Although they bear religious texts they never mention the prophet nor does the official Arab religious confession include mohammed even 30-60 years after his death?

[IThirst4Knowledge]

4 ;0) In fact mohammed's name is absent on all of the early inscriptions, especially the religious ones although many of the later traditions are made up 'Almost Entirely' of narratives on the prophet's life.

[IThirst4Knowledge]

5 ;0)

[IThirst4Knowledge]

5 ;0) These late dates can't be due to the fact that any religious notions took time to penetrate the Arabic inscriptions, for the first Arabic papyrus, an Egyptian entaqion, a receipt for taxes paid dated 642 AD and written in both Greek and Arabic and headed by the "Basmala" yet is neither Christian NOR Muslim in character.

[IThirst4Knowledge]

6 ;0) What they did contain was a monotheistic form of belief, belonging to a certain body of sectarian literature with developed Judaeo-Christian conceptions in a particular literary style, but one which contained no features specific to any known monotheistic religion

[IThirst4Knowledge]

7 ;0) Of even greater significance, these inscriptions show that when the mohammedan formulae is introduced, during the Marwanid period after 684 AD it is carried out "almost overnight" Suddenly it became the state's only form of official religious declaration, and was used exclusively in formal documents and inscriptions, such as the papyrus "protocols"

[IThirst4Knowledge]

8 ;0) In fact, mohammedan formulae (ie there is nogod but allah and mohammed is his apostle) only began to be used in the popular rock inscriptions of the central Negev around 30 years after its introduction by Abd al-Malik sometime during the reign of Caliph Hisham between 724-743 AD though they are NOT muslim!

[IThirst4Knowledge]

9 ;0) The Muslim texts, he believes, only begin to appear at the beginning of the ninth century around 822 A.D., coinciding with the first written Qur'ans, as well as the first written traditional Muslim accounts - Yehuda Nevo

Sadly this historical evidence testifys that islam is a total manmade conction!

[thefotfoundation]

Prof Fred Donner on Nevo: "His argument, however, is circular. The absence of specifically Qur'anic or Muslim phraseology from the generic monotheism of the earliest Negev texts, which he carefully demonstrates, may be taken as evidence for late codification of the Qur'an only if we knew that the Qur'anic text crystallized in this region (i.e. the Negev, or at least geographical Syria)..." Continued...

[thefotfoundation]

"...rather than somewhere else, such as Arabia; but the crystallization of the Qur'an outside Arabia is merely another of Nevo's (and Wansbrough's) assumptions, not a known fact." Peace, fot

[IThirst4Knowledge]

Hi ;0) I expected nothing less than the complete dismissal of the archeaological evidence I have put forward. However I would be very grateful if you can explain 'Why', if mohammed was such a religious icon of his day why he is 'Not' even mentioned till the year 690AD? And can you please cite historical record for the earliest record of islam, ie quiblas, the hajj, mecca? †

Harmony }i{

[thefotfoundation]

You have presented no evidence but have just quoted an Orientalist who is biased according to Prof F Donner. If you wish to base your ideas on the imaginations of Nevo and Wansbrough then be my guest. I have already dealt with your position in the following video "Historicity of Muhammad (pbuh)...Undeniable". Peace, fot

[IThirst4Knowledge]

2 ;0) I also see hard evidence of the muslim "Get out of Truth Free card" ie

Taqiyya - Saying something that isn't true.

Kitman - Lying by omission

is being used in the editing of this video ;0( It is rather pathetic that muslims are permitted to lie to promote the 'TRUTH' of islam! †

Harmony }i{

[thefotfoundation]

You quote the words Taqiyya and Kitman accusing Muslims of being allowed to lie about their religion. This wrong of course but a common tactic used unfortunately by many well meaning Christians. Islam is about Truth, if I lie to you about it then I lie to myself also, which is a bit silly really. continued...

[thefotfoundation]

Maybe you are also guilty of what you accuse other? Read what Paul says: Philippians 1:18: "But what does it matter? The important thing is that in every way, whether from false motives or true, Christ is preached. And because of this I rejoice." I also agree "It is rather pathetic that" Xians "are permitted to lie to promote the 'TRUTH' of" Christianity. Peace, fot

[IThirst4Knowledge]

Hi ;0) I am simpy researching islam from an historic perspective 'Not' theology! I asked a simple question about why mohammed is not mentioned until 690AD and why even Caliph Mu'awiya did not include his name on the dam in built in Ta'if 30 years after mohammed died? All I would like is your explanation ;0) †

Harmony }i{

[hen8167]

@IThirst4Knowledge why would he include muhammads name on it? i dont get your point. So what? Should george washingtons name be on every monument in america? Where does it say in the quran or islam that muslims must include muhammads name on it.

[IThirst4Knowledge]

Hi ;0) It's sad you feel it necessary to deliberately quote Paul 'out of context' simply to impunge Christians as some sort of retaliation to the 'Fact' that muslims are openly permitted to use Taqiyya & Kitman as part of their doctrine of 'Truth'! †

Harmony }i{