On This Day - February 1 - Janet Jackson's breast was revealed during a Super Bowl performance

[KevlarNinja]

Bath school disaster. That does not ring a bell.

[erc355]

Omg. Were still talking about this craziness

[BerserkKai]

Lol at the videos --->

[aldomovielovers]

mind blown

[MrGoodJason]

MY B DAY YAY!

[bitethis47]

people of the past were more interesting...everything was more interesting in the past

[FxNitr0]

i clicked this video thinking it was alltime10s >.<

[ccheng21]

The Nipple that almost destroyed America.....

[SgtJak1665]

whats the song called pls thx :)

[TVmose]

Next will be Madonna! February 5th on NBC! Don't miss it... and watch the full episode of The Voice with Legendtina Aguilera.

[Rariix]

What the fuck. Was it really necessary to make Janet's breast the spotlight for this episode? yuuuck

[EarthrealmAssassin]

WHY WASN'T I THERE?!!!

[alltime10s]

just wanted to say THANK YOU for all the support you've been showing this channel.. :D means a lot guys!!

[ItsAAMarioTime0]

@alltime10s yay

[dooman28]

WHO THE FUCK IS HRRY STYLES !!!!!!!

[likimiki1965]

It's Harry Styles' birthday :D

[StepsFans4Life]

@likimiki1965 who gives a fuck about some shitty boyband there create to makes little girls vages tingle

[Capryism]

Its my Birthday!

[TheHardout2005]

Sooo... Americans had suicide bombers long before the Arabs?

[wazzobazzo]

@TheHardout2005 Do you think arabs would've come up with bombs on their own? You're talking about monkeys with a language hereXD

[TheHardout2005]

@wazzobazzo Oooooh why don't you just drop a few 'sand monkeys' and 'dune coons' while you're at it!

[wazzobazzo]

@TheHardout2005 I thought sand was implied...sigh you're not too bright are you? Religious?

[TheHardout2005]

@wazzobazzo You know I was joking, right? Egging you on.

I'm both very bright and very religious - thanks for asking! I'll ignore the implied contradiction since it's obviously a fallacious one and surely you didn't mean that, right?

By the by: some of my best friends are Arabs. And the Chinese technically invented explosives.

[wazzobazzo]

@TheHardout2005

"You know I was joking, right? Egging you on."

You know I'm serious and don't give a shit what a religious retard thinks right? Choice of religion matters not. Religious = dumb by default no contradiction there.

"By the by: some of my best friends are Arabs."

Care...

"And the Chinese technically invented explosives."

The chinese invented fireworks...Nobel invented stable explosives. Why you're just a walking fail that keeps on giving aren'tchaXD

[TheHardout2005]

@wazzobazzo Oh. I guess bigotry comes from many sources.

I could always provide you with a list of religious people who I'm sure you'd find quite the opposite of 'dumb', but you seem like the fingers-in-ears dogmatic type who wouldn't listen. If you'd like to debate the truth claims of Christianity or theism, go ahead and email me.

Yeah I said technically - they found gunpowder, which is an explosive, which they used for fireworks. Either you fail, or lack intellectually integrity. Which is it?

[wazzobazzo]

@TheHardout2005 "Yeah I said technically - they found gunpowder, which is an explosive, which they used for fireworks. Either you fail, or lack intellectually integrity. Which is it?"

Gunpowder alone doesn't make explosives. I saw a cornfield once and now I'm the inventor of cornflakes?

"Either you fail, or lack intellectually integrity. Which is it?" It's the third unlisted alternative. I'm making you mad for pointing out that dumb people are dumb. Back to the cave for you;)

[TheHardout2005]

@wazzobazzo That's clearly not analogous. Also, go check out the first line of it's listing in wikipedia. "Explosive". You're welcome.



[wazzobazzo]

@TheHardout2005 Inventing a single component for explosives doesn't mean you invented explosives and using Wikipedia as a reliable source of information...well that's just pure and utter fail (in true religious fashion).

You're welcome:)

[TheHardout2005]

@wazzobazzo Gunpowder is an explosive substance - it is not merely a component. You appear to be redefining the terms - moving the goalposts - in favour of something which, rather than coming to the truth, makes you appear right. How noble.

You don't have to be such a sore loser.

Since this is not an academic document, since wikipedia is reliable 99.9% of the time, and since it has references, I'm going to go ahead and use it without fear of judgement. Only a petty person would pick on that.

[wazzobazzo]

@TheHardout2005 Well what I've been talking about in the first place is religion but obviously want to discuss fireworks and explosives (because you know religion fails:) so gonna have a crack at this.

The original thing you picked up on is that arabs didn't invent explosives...they still didn't.

Gunpowders main use is to propel not to blast. Go back and check to see what we were talking about was suicidebombers. Gunpowder wouldn't work too good. Here we have no distinction:)

[TheHardout2005]

@wazzobazzo You write off entire studies, entire areas of life (like religion)? Forgive me if that doesn't seem rational to me. I like to understand things before making a judgement on them.

Yes. And we both know that was a joke.

Now we're talking about the use of gunpowder? No, sir. Allow me to move the goalposts back to where they were: we were discussing its nature. Though I agree that it wouldn't have the 'desired effect' for suicide bombing.

[wazzobazzo]

@TheHardout2005 "I like to understand things before making a judgement on them."

Religion = a primitive way of brainwashing people before a time of laws. Understanding enough? I think believing in things without evidence that has been proven wrong before is the irrational thing to do not the other way around.

"Yes. And we both know that was a joke."

Like religion?

About gunpowder in my coutnry it's classified (and always has been used) as a "propellant" and not an explosive

[TheHardout2005]

@wazzobazzo Ok. You should know that first off, making sweeping statements about entire areas of life (without clearly even knowing what they are, I might add), commits the fallacy of faulty generalisation. Your 'definition' of religion is not one you'd find anywhere, nor is it provable, let alone falsifiable. It's a bare assertion.

Now, 'religion' has not been proven wrong once. Sometimes you might show a single religion to be false, but it is not likely one of the surviving ones. CONT

[wazzobazzo]

@TheHardout2005 Oh religions have been proven wrong time and time again. Theism has not (and I have no problem with the idea of something having created us). It's organized religion that's bs and lies. Go back and read what I've written. In short the idea of a creator = maybe not likely but believable. The idea that this "creator" meddles in peoples lives for being logical = not believable.

[TheHardout2005]

@wazzobazzo CONT It is definitely not my one. Nor has theism ever been disproved, and there are many solid logical proofs for theism. I would not be in my religion any more had I not researched it and found it to be extremely likely to be true (the same is not even possible of atheism, since it is a negative claim).

If you would really like to, I can point you in the direction of some videos which I think provide damn good evidence for, for starters, theism.

[MegaSavvis]

thumbs up if you googled the picture after you saw this video

[jonathan1994ish1]

why the fuck is the last story included?

[JackThaRipper2121]

It actually is my birthday too. lol :D

[VlaDZeroOrDie]

I usually like your videos, is just that I don't see why is the Janet Jackson's breast relevant. -__-

[MRdotSmil3Z]

@VlaDZeroOrDie stuff that happened on this day... that happened feb first so its relevant

[BlackFalcon95]

@VlaDZeroOrDie It was one of the biggest commotions in recent history :P But i don't understand why either.

[carllito12]

@VlaDZeroOrDie Its relevant because it happened on this date

[VlaDZeroOrDie]

@carllito12 Thanks captain obvious. I mean it might be a little relevant, but this should not be by any reason the headline. I think that the "United Arab Republic" formation is way more important than The Janet's breast.

[jtollison]

@VlaDZeroOrDie It is not relevant that her breast was exposed, but it is relevant that this act caused live TV to have a delay so television stations have the oppurtunity to catch and prevent things like this from happening in the future. This single act changed not only they way we will ever see another super bowl, but every live event ever......

[SilentlySearching]

@VlaDZeroOrDie boobs are always relevant

[mindstormd]

Exposed.

[CaptainAlliance]

@mindstormd LOL

[RayGLouis]

LoL

[beltedDEEP]

once again, cool upload. :)

[Muralidharan001]

Man u r insane. is that anet Jackson's breast important?

[TehBunnyzory]

Slow news day...