Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (167)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • ty

  • Not bad, not bad at all. You presented this very wel. I enjoyed watching it, looking forward to more videos from you. I am just getting started with with creating video content and it is not as easy as it looks... well... its not as easy as YOU make it look. Nice work.

  • very true

  • useful ang video para sa economics student.

  • China and India are exploited by corporations for power and profit. People there are forced to work in horrible, slave-like conditions.

  • Chinese won't last longer - India will have the last laugh...

  • INDIAN PEOPLE ROCK

  • Microfinance will destroy the social harmony in China like it is already doing in India and other countries utilizing this scam.

    Only a tiny fraction of the loan takers is successfull and the rest is stuck in a debt trap where the only solution out is often suicide by drinking pesticide.

    Everyone can be an entrepreneur but only a fraction will be successfull enough to pay off their debt of often over hundreds of % a year.

    A wise man once said "The one placed in debt is not free.".

  • Great speech .It really was informative .I studied in china but i realize that India has it's potential in doing a great job in the future with china ...which i was never able to imagine!

  • Billions of Entreprenuers verry catch words... Look at the fact In 1976 India’s per capita income was around US $ 365 per year, China was around US $ 350 & Pakistan was around us $ 380. Today (2011) ,China is around nominal per capita income is $ 4,283, PPP per capita income is $ 7,518. India’s nominal per capita income is $ 1,176 & PPP per capita is $ 3,290. Pakistan nominal per capita income is $ $1,067 & PPP per capita is $ 2,713. India will be.. could be..doesn't look nice from professor

  • Government of India should declare national emergency. This problem poses number one threat to existent of the country, its economy & lively hood of all people. And government should have time table of 5 to 10 years. Clean it up, whatever means necessary. Let it be national news headline “All foreign counties won’t give us business, they will move out unless we keep it clean.”

  • Indian municipalities don’t have any garbage collection or cleaning, or disposable system to keep cities clean. This is serious health hazard along with its slums. Central government should have some law that should mandate cities to keep it clean. And it should be enforced at national emergency level. Chopati beach look like gutter & whole cities look garbage. Forget about slums democracy, or communism. It is national emergency

  • On the part where Mr.Khanna said that poor people vote for what is required in their immediate environment.Things are changing lately -2010 Bihar elections showed that even poor people have understood the fruits of growth n development and have voted for a Govt which efficiently brought the GDP growth rate of Bihar to 10%.In may elections in West Bengal similar thing is going to happen.People of West Bengal are going to remove the inefficient corrupt Govt ruling this state for last 34 years.

  • Hi...I found this interesting literature on the same topic....

    Indian Automotive Industry 2016: Plans and Repercussions

    AND Challenges and Opportunities for India on Engaging with China

    Check out at MyCarMyChoice (dot) com

  • LEARN THE INSIDER SECRETS OF THE SUPER WEALTHY !!

    30billionaireschangingtheworld dot kom

  • u mother fucker wat u write abt nepal

  • INDIA GIVE MY MONEY AND COMPENSATION CHARGE TO 1200 LITTLE POOR CHILDREN SEE YOUTUBE india spanish rojas love. SO INDIA TOGIVE OUR SPANISH NGOLAND FROM HARIDWAR INDIA

  • INDIA GIVE MY MONEY AND COMPENSATION CHARGE TO 1200 LITTLE POOR CHILDREN SEE YOUTUBE india spanish rojas

  • 1 point re: Microfinance.

    I always thought the Microfinance industy invested nominal amounts of money for a high, theoretical return-on-investment on paper. Given that the input is solid, stable investors with large investors and stakeholders'; meanwhile the output part, the loan of individual risk is almost nothing re: nominal amounts, ... win-win sounds like. Unless all investors and stakeholders decide to quit at the same time. Catastrophe ... there's insurance for that.

  • 1 point re: Microfinance.

    I always thought the Microfinance industy invested nominal amounts of money for a high, theoretical return-on-investment on paper. Given that the input is solid, stable investors with large inestors and stakeholders'; meanwhile the output part, the loan of individual risk is almost nothing re: nominal amounts, ... win-win sounds like. Unless all inestors and stakeholders decide to quit at the same time. Catastrophe ... there's insurance for that.

  • This guy knows nothing at all, it's surprise to see Google invites such an idiot.

  • Great lecturer ......very knowledgable lecture

  • Tolerant my ass, say that to the thousands of Muslims and Christians massacred by the hindus in India.

  • @3rdWorldVideo ...India with a Hindu majority has made place for the second largest Muslim population to reside with them last count the muslims population numbered at 170 million. If they were serious grievances within the muslim and the catholic community (45 million ) we would be seeing a series of bombs yet india is relatively stable. Iraq and Pakistan witness more bombs, a sign of instability and internal grivenances.

  • Percentage of Muslims in India in 1951 = 10.7%

    Percentage of Muslims in India in 2001 = 13.4%

    Percentage of growth of Muslims in India from 1991 to 2001 = 29.5%

    Percentage of growth of Hindus in India from 1991 to 2001 = 20.3%

    Percentage of Hindus in Pakistan in 1951 = 22%

    Percentage of Hindus in Pakistan in 1998 = 1.7%

    Percentage of Hindus in Bangladesh in 1974 = 13.5%

    Percentage of Hindus in Bangladesh in 2001 = 9.2%

    (Sources: Census of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh)

    PEACE.

  • @AhimsaIndia You are a silly fundamentalist. You forgot something. Muslim population in India was already 10 per cent by circa 1600.

  • @anwarsadat You remain as usual a Jahil Pakistani,CENSUS is being conducted in India from late 1800s,so how can you say the muslim population of India was 10% circa 1600.

  • @AhimsaIndia Translation... Hinduism has helped India in the past, for example, with people like Ghandi, Esq.

    In other words, there is a strong correlation between Hinduism and The Pursuit of Freedom? Very interesting plot you have here Ahimsa.

    -All American, born and raised.

  • @3rdWorldVideo os shit.. haha.. how lame are u .. no one do it without any reason. You muslim and christian mother fuckers cant sit at home and u guys want to spread ur screwed up religion. Yeah we cant spare our religion getting invaded (again) ... its not massacre , its called protecting ones religion..

    Ask all those muslims and christians to do their business and see how peaceful India is.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Amazing video, I watched it all. This man's a walking encyclopedia of business

  • There's too much tolerance to stink in india

  • amazing so interesting and so exciting that this is happening wonderful lecture

    Sally Drew south africa

  • there are other religions in india besides hinduism

  • @ajazaad there are sizable muslim and sikhist populations. jainism and buddhism (if you call it a religion) are there too. As india is becoming a part of the global community i'd assume every major religion is represented there.

  • if any one of u willing to see what the putted in words, just WATCH THIS DOC...

    watch?v=ANZZa5IabJ4&feature=su­b

  • Caijing's English website has about 10% of the information as the Chinese website. For starters, none of the videos are translated to english. I was thinking about translating some of them, fascinating videos on bank lending, real estate, micro-finance, history etc.

  • developing country is not only china and india, narrow minded idiots are thinkin how to make fake stuffs, sale all over the world. Dont give a f... idiots. all u do is just for urselves.

  • @TheZmzmz developing 'major economies' are china and india

  • Comment removed

  • Who is this f*cking idiot!? Let's go to Harvard to kick his ass!

  • Oh really... why dont u come with the response video showing ur f*cking talent...???

  • Interesting

  • See, it comes down to the basic philosophical question - If by killing a poor little girl, all diseases of humanity could be eradicated, would you kill the little girl?

    Indian governance system would most definitely say No. I'm curious to know how would the Chinese system react to this dilemma.

  • Chinese won't have to react. Japanese/Germans would've killed the girl already.

  • the end does not justify the means. on the other hand, if the girl attacked me with a knife and tried murdering me, than its ok to stop her by killing her in self defense

  • they will brainwash that poor girl and make her to say yes

  • Comment removed

  • Again, it is acutally more democracy that may hold India back, and it is less freedom/democracy in China that is fueling its growth.

  • @eleven451 you think democracy is holding back India? Just look how damn big USA,with freedom/democracy..

  • @eleven451 It's not the democracy that holds India back. It's their low 80's IQ that holds india back

  • @3rdWorldVideo You don't display great IQ with such stupid comments either.

  • @eleven451 Communism has never worked and we all know what happened to the World Largest Communist Nation in 1989... It's just a matter of time for China to have an Uprising that will make Chinese People want an accountable system of Government that is Democratic and Represents the People, Not a Board of People that decide the Fate of an entire Nation...

    Who would have thought Iron Fist Regimes such as Libya and Egypt would see uprising ? You can never predict when the next Rising in China is.

  • @forgottenmemories63 do you not pay attention to anything. Chinese culture itself has always been one where the interest of the group is ahead of the individual. Look at what has happened to those Democratic countries you appear to like. Those countries claim to represent the people, but at what cost. Collapse of the economy, heavy debts etc. Communism never worked in Soviet Union simply because they were in a cold war with the USA, so their funds were used inefficiently.

  • The funny thing is that China - a country that discourages individual rights, debates, rule of law, will continue growing for these very reasons. The very reasons that most western academics believe are the fundamentals of good governance are the very reasons that are holding india back - thus more democracy is actually holding india back while less freedom/democracy is actually pushing China's growth rate to above 10% ... That's Funny !

  • it is nice to actually be able to have a real discussion on youtube. My view is, sometimes individual needs can be sacrifised for the good of others. Like the question about the little girl and mankind. of course she has the right to live, but does she have the right to make millions of lives miserble ? just for her need? i would rather die if i were her. when the day comes that everybody is rich in china, im sure that democracy will take root, all by itself.

  • we can see this also on the issue of tibet. you might not know, but the tibet is the lifeline of china. both big ribers, the yangtze and yellow river begin in tibets mountains. what would happen if tibet did become independent, and they decided to cut off the two rivers? millions of people would suffer and die. so if i was the president, i would rather see the dalai lama burn instead of putting the lives of millions more at risk.

  • Tibet wants freedom??that's not the issue with tibet enways..It just wants to preserve it's culture and you guys don't want to do let it be..

  • please understand that when you are in charge, when you have the lives of a billion people in your hands, when there life and death depends on your decision, there is no right or wrong, there is only what you need to do, and what you don't need to do

    thank you

  • Mr146880 , I understand tht Tibbet is ur lifeline but why we don't hold dialouge with him and find out a peaceful solution?

    Even without giving them independence , you can give them autonomy.

  • leaving a strong enemy is always dangerous, why don't you give Hu Jintao a call ? this is his phone number : ) 158 888 88888

  • Mr146880, China isn't our internal enemy. We have already started talks with separists groups in India like ULFA, NSCN etc. And offcourse we want to have talks with China -not bcoz they are strong enemy but bcoz they r our neighbour and we want good relation with every neighbour.

  • Every USD china earned from abroad, it deserved to their work.

    It should be respected.

  • hundreds of these mythical billions have to crawl out of AIDS and malnutrition and a turgid bureacrazy first-

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Guys, guys, comments are getting off-topic now. Finally, there is an educated guy holding a seminar with well-researched material, and people are more interested in each other comments than his. In short what he's saying that China is more focused on the public interest and has an advantage over India in hard infrastructure (roads, buildings, public places), while India is more on private interest and has an edge over China in soft infrastructure (legal system, investor protection).

  • It doesn't however mean that both lack what the other has, it's only that one finds it more difficult to progress on what the other finds it only natural. What he's trying to say is that China is politically not the same like 10 years ago, but the progress is still slow compared to its infrastructure growth. In India, it's the other way round, infrastructure is being transformed, but not fast enough to accommodate its growth because of the legal system.

  • For them to fully develop their potential, they both need to overcome their shortcomings. In China's case democratic institutions need to be more developed, and for India's the hard infrastructure needs to be speeded up. However, I agree with him that these will take more time than people hope will take, but I certainly believe they're absolutely possible.

  • Population is not equal to market until it is empowered by education and job creation. So the risk of a new world order dominated by China or India is non-existent.

  • look at american top unis... they are filled with chinkies.. lots of american jobs have been lost to china... china holds trillions of usd ...

  • I am Indian and i totally disaprove the title, India of all the countries? How about including Congo as well?

    India had thousands of prince states and now have thousand of political parties. The energy of the poor is sucked by the rich money men because there is no one pointed aim where the energy can be directed.

    Change the thousand god religion in india into no god, we will imm see a one party state and we will have progress for the people, not an elite few.

  • india had been rfuge for jews for 2000 years , parsis from iran for 1000 years, 5 million tibetians from last 50 years. now indian become refugee in india. but india is rich in empathy and love and compasion. it is nice to see 2000 years old refugees going back to their own countries. by the way when europeans came to india they chased the jews to jungles. and when islam came to india they try to chase parsis

  • No - there was only 250'000 to 300'000 Tibetans Refugee :)

  • In China, first, there is a part of culture that centralism management. secondly, since ww1 till the cold war the sort of suspect private right may bring up separate by weatern leading us lost indepent building up.

  • Lol, you are jealous! hehehe.....

  • you people type so much bullshit is insane!!!

  • Which system works better, China's or India's? Just look at the stats. China has brought over 300 million people out of poverty and is putting a cap on its population growth using forced family planning. India on the other hand, has hundreds of millions in poverty and the faster the population grows, the situation will be worse.

  • and setting itself up for political instability in the future with a one party state.

  • you may be right, however, it is still presumptuous. there are pros & cons to a 2 party vs a 1 party state. each has its short comings & challenges. 2 party state: bickering, scheming, fighting to be elected 4-5 yrs, short-term focused, elected by the masses, Bush is one example of an idiot voted twice by idiots. 1 party state: corruption, abuse of power, non-transparent system of governance.

  • Which one is better for which country?

    Just look at stats and the living standard of the people? Ask the people and you'll find the truth.  US government approval rating 30%, China's gov. approval rating 80%. India's gov. approval rating = ? (not sure)

  • commies

  • India's population growth is a more natural one, it should peak at about 1.5 billion people ... but what it has achieved is a more youthful population, china with its forced population will see alot more elderely people before its economy has peaked which is actually disasterous.

  • Yes, that is quite true. However, how can a country feed so many people? What kind of quality of life with most of the people have? I think it is fairly safe to say, if one has 1 loaf of bread, he/she would be full eating it. If he/she had to share it with 10 other people?

    Finally, what one calls "young" will eventually get "old". What will happen then? How will all those "old" people be taken care of. The US is facing the same challenge now. Social security is going  bankrupt!!

  • I largely agree. The point I would add is that while both models are in a way extremes ends, a well balanced society needs to be somewhere in the middle. As India moves along the path to prosperity it would be imperative for it to develop a more vibrant state based organizations. For China challenge is even bigger as it would need to challenge its people to grow beyond the boundaries it has so wilfully created. In fact based on my understanding, I almost feel this challenge is insurmountable.

  • nice talk Mr. Khanna

  • India is the best

  • interesting comments. since i am a nepalese. and of a mongol kirat race. nepal originally was ruled by kirat and other mongoloid tribes.. and later by various indo-iranian-aryan tribes till date.

    so if you take a closer look at nepal, today you will see about 60/40 percent ratio of about 105 ethnic groups comprising under the two main streams.

    nepal is very unique culturally from both india and china really :)

  • StephenTsang sounds like a fool.

  • Don't speak Chinese

    wow this is a channel

  • India Conquered and dominated China culturally for 20 centuries without ever having to send a single soldier across her border.

    As a Buddhist myself i would say that caste system is not a proble as its seen if watch media then we can also thik that pakistan is full of Talibanis allover..

  • Buddha was born in Nepal but his father origined from present India..So Buddha is Indian not nepalsese...

  • Buddha was from Nepal. Nepal is a part of the indian civilization.10,000 year old Indian civilization is different from the 60 year old Republic of India. Buddha is an icon of Indian civilization. The Chinese premier on his visit to India himself conceded, India dominated china in literally all spheres for 2000 years, all without sending a single soldier beyond her borders. You sound like you have a passionate dislike for anything Indian. Surely, you are not opinionated.

  • BUddha was born in Nepal while his mother was on his trip to her brother who had residence in todays Nepal..BUddhas original home his fathers home was in India..

  • Parthsna is 200% right...excellent post sir..plz keep posting more...

  • "stephen tsang" -- like your changed name, it seems you are only aware of the ways of the americans.

    US follows "jus soli" or "right of land" for conferring citizenship. India follows "jus sanguinis" or "right of blood" for conferring citizenship. we have no reason to believe that US laws were applicable in Buddha's time.

  • I am not from America. And Buddha was Nepalese, which is more close to Tibet than India.

  • When Budda was born there was no Nepal,Tibet etc....everything were a part of Bharatha Khanda...India...

  • Nepal is culturally similar to tibet and not india? You have been watching too much chinese propaganda. Time to snap back to reality my friend. 90% of nepal are hindus. 20 of india's infantry batallions are the Gurkha Regiments recruited from nepal. Nepalese fight for the indian army, what else do you want? Just because some stupid maoists run the country now does not mean history has changed. Not implying that you think otherwise but still, just saying.

  • Compare the number of hindi sp

    eakers in nepal with chinese speakers. Nepali is written in sanskrit script and not chinese. Nepali sounds like hindi and not chinese.90% of population hindu. Gurkhas fight for Indian army and not PLA. Hong Kong Gurkhas are legacy of the british. Gurkhas itself are a kshatriya caste of the indian civilization. One has to be deluded to claim nepal is closer to china/tibet than India. You pass judgments without any historical background of the region.

  • Search for Gurkhas on Wiki, Also please teach yourself about India a little, India is home to all Human races you can ever Imagine. Gurkhas are not particularly Nepalese, a sizeable population lives inside India, Gurkhas originated from North India and entered Nepal through western border to conquer Nepal.

  • Gurkhas are mongol tribe such Thapa mager, Rai, Lama, Tamang, Limbu, Gurung etc. so first investigate and write comments.

  • he wasn't a Chinese.... refer history....

  • Religious ideologies mostly and cultural as well..

  • chinese pm said "culturally" dominated. I think any high ancient civilization can only survive IN WHOLE (that is with its traditions,unlike big part of china excluding taiwan/HK or south america or egypt excluding the coptics) can do so only by being like water streams,nonagressive,non-natio­nalistic,letting all in and flowing freely

  • I LOL'ed...hope you understand, India is not a country until British paste all those small "kingdoms" together.

    How long was that? 1 century ago?

    and About the Budda...where is buddah in india now? and you know what is Chan?

    besides, I do think caste system is a problem.

  • ever wondered what was common amongst those "small kingdoms"? Time didn't "start" after the British came to India. Read some history books.

    The British didn't paste anything. Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel did after India got independence in 1947. Again, read some books.

  • ever heard of akbar, chandragupta maurya, ashoka... sorry mate, learn something..

  • Bharat (India) existed since time of Vedas, as far as kingdoms are concerned, there existed thousands of fiefdoms inside UK itself. India was Integrated and divided again and again, but there is only one holy land called India/Bharat.

  • did somebody asked your opinion here..

    And you proved that are too ignorant to even think of giving an opinion here. Please go back to school and study some history books.

  • no, china took budhism and transformed it into something that works better whith the chinese people at that time. if you look at it it is actually really different. i am chinese budhist and all the gods, stories are different. if you put it your way, we can say that israel has been dominating the west since jesus was born!

  • You cant transform the message of Buddhism into somthing else otherwise it would not be Buddhism.

  • 1. There is no such 'religion' as hinduism.

    2. Religion is not an Indian concept.

    3. These classes u refer to exist globally even today, shudras(common workers), brahmins(elite, intellectuals, politicians), kshatriyas(monarchs, soldiers etc.) and baniyas(businessman, managers etc.)

    4. It was not heridatory in India. It was the ancient Indian form of today's social classes.

    5. The present caste debate in India is 'identity politics'. Brahmin named people are as poor as Shudra named ones.

  • you give me a few isolated incidents and ignore the better 99% of the situation. Which other society has tolerated so many religions throughout history? The recent tension with Christians was due to bogus missionary groups and their fraudulent coercive measures of conversion. These groups use money and propaganda to convert uneducated tribesman which made local groups angry. With Sonia Gandhi's government over the last five years, fraudulent missionary activity has grown and angered the locals.

  • I say bogus because they used Indian government money disguised as NGOs doing social work and carrying out conversions through coercive means in the process. I agree with you on the Phsycopathic killer theory, but refuse to include 1.1 billion Indians in that category. The very reason 900 million Hindus allow the 50 million Indian Christian community to thrive is the reason.

  • NGO's itself stands for non governmental organization . How can they be getting their funds from the governement ?

    and the Christian groups have been growing because

    1) Christian do believe in spreading thier religion.. a somewhat antiquated idea.

    2) Hindu lower castes are still unable to escape discrimination under the caste system especially in rural areas (orissa ) converting to another more egalitarian religion gives them some hope .

    Not entirely the christian missionaries fault .

  • Search fraudulent conversions india and you will know. These are unrecognised bogus churches. many of these were prosecuted in the states and Europe for embezzlements and fraud. And it was nothing more than some thug violence, the sensational Indian media blows out of proportion minor incidences. Some Church gets vandalized and they report a genocide of Christians. Otherwise, the international community would have condemned India like they did china after Tianamen.

  • I have to agree with u , Hinduism is a very tolerant religion.. sometime i think its a little too tolerant for its own well being.

  • thats how hinduism is able to survive all these years, it accepts better ideologies and capable of reshaping it self over the time.... the religion which tolerates other ideologies, grows.

  • @eleven451 So tolerant, you can be an athiest and still be hindu.

  • @slurpeeday .. The most tolerant people are athiest. This is true even if u look through history. To me this is probably the reason why India is naturally a tolerant nation.

  • Christianity tops the highest rank in making holocausts from the era of medievil europe to present so called war on terror..

  • [[People who believed in Hinduism killed the Christians in India North-East from time to time ....]]: Gather a good knowledge before talking about an issue, Christians were attacking Hindu villages and places of worship since one year before violence took place. Christian missionaries were distributing literature spreading mis-information about Hinduism. Do you know how many Ak-47s and grenades were captured from christian homes?

  • what are you? an Idiot in making or an idiot already by birth!!

    You don't have information even about some important things of your own God "Buddha" and you speak about hindu, christian??

    Learn about your religion first..

  • lol, poverty is a human right.

  • what's the name of that chinese website he talks about at 13:30? "saijing"? i can't find it with google.

  • cai jing literally economics

  • thank you :)

  • India is right to side on the side of individual rights. I know it is hard to see that but the abuses that occur when courts start erring on the side of development ruin the things of the society that make it attractive byond markets. I am certainly in favor of economic growth but the abuses of emminent domain in the US are inexcusable and it is far better for the society overall to allow individuals to refuse to sell in the vast majority of cases.

  • agreed. i think "the individual" is more important to an economy than it's big corporations because most innovation comes from "the individual".

  • While the talk counterpoints public interest and personal interest with respect to the slums in India. It also ignores that many of the slums are a direct result of large scale govt plans of arguable public interest nad arguable constitutionality. So the public vs person view is not quiet correct

  • The Indians will benefit in the long run.  All comes down the individual. They have made great strides in short time. Give more time and you will see.

  • indiaans!!!1

  • I also found this very interesting.

    But, Isn't it sad that so few people watch Google Tech Talk's intelligent videos?

  • I agree most of the truly intelligent videos are not watched its great to be able to subscribe to these channels

  • You guys should check out University channels like UCberkeley.. MIT.. etc..

    The situation is similar with them..

  • Hi can u suggest some good channels please !

  • Yes, as I said before, several university channels are quite interesting. Some examples are "ucberkeley" "mit" "edinburghuniversity" As well as non school channels like "WorldEconomicForum" "Googledelevopers" "Googletechtalks" "cepr" etc.. These are just a portion, however, I should say they are by no means always factual, but certainly very informative.

    Look at "related videos" to the right, you'll see some good channels like "yaleuniversity" etc..

  • 'nptelhrd' Indian engineering program channel.. like MIT or Stanford's channels but 5x as many classes. you could get an education in engineering in several different branches on that channel alone.

  • Very Interesting

  • Hi. I tried contacting AtGoogleTalks to inform that the video of Ellen Fisher posted on March 05 has very poor audio but comments and messages were disabled. Can something be done about the audio? Thank you. This lecture about India and China was awesome, thanks for posting.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 0