2. The microphones on cameras have a cut-off point of how loud the sound is. If the sound gets too loud, it stops recording audio because it doesn't want to be damaged.
no we didnt you are all tards look this up on google and you'll find many other theories that no matter how hard you try you won't be able to defend your point
@ 8:07 who is filming when the lander takes off back to Earth? It looks like the camera tilts up to follow it. If it was placed there, and then remote controlled, why didn't we do that all over the Moon so we could still be getting pictures to this day?
"If the lander was so unstable and difficult to fly IN THE CONTROLLED ENVIORNMENT OF EARTH, then how could the LEM land six times, flawlessly, in the alien environment of the Moon?"
Ummm ... since WHEN is the environment of Earth controllable?!? In fact, doesn't something like 80% or more of all airplane crashes occur during the take-offs and the landings BECAUSE of such UNCONTROLLABLE events such as sudden wind shear?
Everything aside, everysingle human being that has had some sort of education know that flag flapping around in the space does not happen. There has never been an explanation for this.
@SZSearcher NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter photographed it but an orbiter launched by japan did not .... can you explain it to me, that why japnese could not find the flag and landing sites
Jesus. FOX does everything they can to support these theories, from creative editing to flashing lights and whooshes to keep the knuckle-draggers entertained.
It's funny how FOX viewers can make great leaps of faith to support conspiracy theories regarding the legitimacy of the moon landings, but they think climate change is an obvious hoax.
Read BADASTRONOMOY website! "But then I realized why: he claims that alien bases exist on the Moon, and uses NASA imagery to "prove" it. So he was really stuck: he had to support NASA on his page, because if he said the Moon landings were faked, how would he have those pictures he'd been touting? The irony of that situation is delicious to me. One of NASA's biggest detractors, forced by his own nonsense into supporting them. "
Why don't remote viewers look at the moon and see if they did go to the moon and see if the flag is there? It sounds like it was done at Area 51 to me and this place officially doesn't exist. The technology of the late sixties prevented anyone from going to the moon. It was not possible. Astronauts are talking in the cabin yet no rocket noise. Someday the real truth will come out and many will be shocked by it.
and as none of us have been out of earths atmosphere then we only have our opinions, and must have to accept that even our own opinions are from our own mind but are based upon evidence someone else told! so if they didnt tell u, then obviously u would never know! every thing u know someone else or someones book told u! that is 100% FACT! and if they didn't want u to know u would never know, lol ur books and theories are not ur own, u addopted them from books and telepothyvision set! all FACT!
i didn't make a provocative statment, i asked, so if no blast crater is normal from a jet engine, why does the buggy leave deap tracks and kick up dust upto 4ft into the air? why do their boots do the same? if u feal it is provocing then u must be very insecure, probably the reason u have gone offencive with ur age coment! well i'll tell u something! u only know what some else told u! u aint never been to the moon u dont have any experiance, u know what nasa told u and nothing more! thats fact!
lmao! ur so behined the point! nevermind, see masonic moon and moon landing a fact or fake, the pictures with airbrushed structures is ocvious evidence that those pics were taken at area51 studios, and some sheeple think they are structures on the moon roflmfao! if i come acroos as 10yrs how old do u sound to try and argue over an opinion? i dont think they faked the landings, i know the pics are mostly replicas of the poor quality ones they had. the suits was poor radiation repeling, thats fact
so why does the wheels on the buggy kick up dust and why does the footage show their feet kicking up dust? it's because most of the footage was shot on earth because the footage and photos they had was very poor
The Vacuum atmosphere only partially explains the lack of dust on the footpads. There's no atmospheric turbulence, so exhaust is deflected outward, blasting dust radially outward in a horizontal, laminar flow. ALSO, once the four foot long probes touched the soil, they cut the engine and the LEM free fell the rest of the way. There IS evidence of the engine exhaust under the LEMS. Click my name this posting, see my profile, follow the link to my Photobucket site.
Exhaust plume? The moon has 1/6 the gravity of Earth. You don't need a whole lot of exhaust to propel your way out of the moon's gravitational pull, thus there would be no exhaust plume. Another myth busted.
wrong there is an exhaust plume if we had actually went. view the space shuttle it has a visible blue flume from the hydrazine, same as used in apollo
Engine noise? Seriously? Anyone who knows space travel 101 knows that where there is not atmosphere there is no noise. Last I checked the moon still has no atmosphere. There's at least on myth busted.
Wolf, you're forgetting something, the engine is attached to the Lem and causes vibrations. Since the inside contains air, it will have the medium required to transmit vibrations (ie. sound) that must be transmitted to the microphone. If you were outside of the craft, then with the absence of air, you would hear nothing.
Man did really land on the Moon. This has been proven by a National Geographic program explaining how all these so called 'errors' in the pictures appear.Jodrell Bank tracked the actual craft right up to landing and the russians tracked the LMs every movement. Start waking up and start believing.
it's a great program, testimony to the real story. It's on Youtube as [NGC]Presents-Conspiracy Moon Landing. Anyway, good to hear from a fellow 'believer' so to speak.
Thanks i was obsessed with the wii and the next i in mii wouldnt fit so i went with mi instead of mii and wiiwouldliketoplay was taken so u get the idea
Attention World: The films of the atomic explosions are FALSES see my videos " Atomic Bomb Does Not Exist by Andre Mauro " and an exclusive interview whith NASA`s administrator about the other fake mith "The Man on the Moon" - "Moongate - Moon`s Show by Andre Mauro " and my theory about the solar system " The Earth Doesn`t Turn Around the Sun by André Mauro" (version en espanhol mire " bomba atomica no existe "user cybercheguevara)
Not surprising this showed up on Fox. The network responsible for the "Alien Autopsy" footage, not to mention the entire Fox News network, which is widely know for it's conspiracy theorists.
I'm not saying its real... Or fake, but there was also no sound due to the vacuum that space is... Just saying.
HX422 1 month ago
man never been there !
luky727x 5 months ago
There is no noise in space it was real asswhipes
xxx1620 7 months ago
Martin Mull as narrator. Hoax is a hoax.
sedagive3 7 months ago
There's no sound in the landing footage because
1. Space is a vacuum there is no sound.
2. The microphones on cameras have a cut-off point of how loud the sound is. If the sound gets too loud, it stops recording audio because it doesn't want to be damaged.
JarheadAirsoft 8 months ago
ummmm sound waves cant travel through space because there arnt any air molecules for the wave to bounce on
lilaliyahi 9 months ago
hoax.
ebtitel0000 10 months ago
AS SIMPLE AS HOAX.
ebtitel0000 10 months ago
as simple as HOAX.
ebtitel0000 10 months ago
When the lander takes off back to earth, where is the huge exhaust plume (supposed to be pinkish in colour) that would emanate from nozzle?
kaderoder 11 months ago
no we didnt you are all tards look this up on google and you'll find many other theories that no matter how hard you try you won't be able to defend your point
MrPakothetaco 1 year ago
@ 8:07 who is filming when the lander takes off back to Earth? It looks like the camera tilts up to follow it. If it was placed there, and then remote controlled, why didn't we do that all over the Moon so we could still be getting pictures to this day?
lobsterg 1 year ago 3
There's one thing not mentioned in this documentary:
There is no sound in space (lacking oxygen).
So the sound of the turbine isn't heard.
DrUltraBeauty 1 year ago
@DrUltraBeauty Exactly was i was going to write now, man, you beat me to it :D
qurra2 1 year ago
Narrators EXACT words:
"If the lander was so unstable and difficult to fly IN THE CONTROLLED ENVIORNMENT OF EARTH, then how could the LEM land six times, flawlessly, in the alien environment of the Moon?"
Ummm ... since WHEN is the environment of Earth controllable?!? In fact, doesn't something like 80% or more of all airplane crashes occur during the take-offs and the landings BECAUSE of such UNCONTROLLABLE events such as sudden wind shear?
No hoax, folks. We just question everthing now.
BobbyFz 1 year ago
the moon landings were real do some research its amazing how stupid americans are
fonziheights 1 year ago
@fonziheights amazing how ignorant to outstanding lies even a monkey can see..yea
deenman23 1 year ago
Everything aside, everysingle human being that has had some sort of education know that flag flapping around in the space does not happen. There has never been an explanation for this.
toolzroolz 2 years ago
Flap flapping in space is possible - when it's touched. Easy as that.
Fr4nkWh1te 1 year ago
NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has photographed all six Apollo moon landing sites. :)
SZSearcher 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SZSearcher NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter photographed it but an orbiter launched by japan did not .... can you explain it to me, that why japnese could not find the flag and landing sites
TheMandy0123 1 year ago
Comment removed
leo20789 2 years ago
So what,. the Google corp have brains, they are knew where the dangerous stuff was, and how to keep their "mouths" shut
leo20789 2 years ago
The camera follows the lem up who filmed it,
OU8121ST 2 years ago
the lunar rover had a camera on it, and it was timed perfectly for when they would go up
RoPWU 2 years ago
Jesus. FOX does everything they can to support these theories, from creative editing to flashing lights and whooshes to keep the knuckle-draggers entertained.
It's funny how FOX viewers can make great leaps of faith to support conspiracy theories regarding the legitimacy of the moon landings, but they think climate change is an obvious hoax.
We are all doomed.
davidstripling 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Read BADASTRONOMOY website! "But then I realized why: he claims that alien bases exist on the Moon, and uses NASA imagery to "prove" it. So he was really stuck: he had to support NASA on his page, because if he said the Moon landings were faked, how would he have those pictures he'd been touting? The irony of that situation is delicious to me. One of NASA's biggest detractors, forced by his own nonsense into supporting them. "
Bugstomper2 2 years ago
only 1 evidence from those evidences can prove its 100 % fake. Specialy the flag part man they scrowed it up.lol
mazazekooo 2 years ago
Why don't remote viewers look at the moon and see if they did go to the moon and see if the flag is there? It sounds like it was done at Area 51 to me and this place officially doesn't exist. The technology of the late sixties prevented anyone from going to the moon. It was not possible. Astronauts are talking in the cabin yet no rocket noise. Someday the real truth will come out and many will be shocked by it.
jpsmart59 2 years ago
fldjgfglfsdlfdsugluhdfuyghkjufghjfhgjfhgfjhgfjhgfjghfjghfjghfjgfisdol
0195279712 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hjhjvd jkld klmas<mkla<fvnfvnfjldökljsklöscmsacmkjkdvjvdnvdsnsdvnjvsdvshvngvjnfvjnvfgjnjfvjnrvjnrgvjrgvjigrjifgjigrjirgjigrvjirgvjirvgjivgrjifrgvjnihmfrgjnijnivgfjinv
GoingToFast 2 years ago
ayam berak kapur
0195279712 2 years ago
shuffle hardstyle republic
0195279712 2 years ago
lol, i appolgise if it sounded attitudey, it wasn't intensional. we seem to agree on more than we dissagree
johnyb553 3 years ago
GOOGLE "AREA51 PRODUTIONS"! u will see the types of films they have had envolvments with
johnyb553 3 years ago
and as none of us have been out of earths atmosphere then we only have our opinions, and must have to accept that even our own opinions are from our own mind but are based upon evidence someone else told! so if they didnt tell u, then obviously u would never know! every thing u know someone else or someones book told u! that is 100% FACT! and if they didn't want u to know u would never know, lol ur books and theories are not ur own, u addopted them from books and telepothyvision set! all FACT!
johnyb553 3 years ago
i didn't make a provocative statment, i asked, so if no blast crater is normal from a jet engine, why does the buggy leave deap tracks and kick up dust upto 4ft into the air? why do their boots do the same? if u feal it is provocing then u must be very insecure, probably the reason u have gone offencive with ur age coment! well i'll tell u something! u only know what some else told u! u aint never been to the moon u dont have any experiance, u know what nasa told u and nothing more! thats fact!
johnyb553 3 years ago
lmao! ur so behined the point! nevermind, see masonic moon and moon landing a fact or fake, the pictures with airbrushed structures is ocvious evidence that those pics were taken at area51 studios, and some sheeple think they are structures on the moon roflmfao! if i come acroos as 10yrs how old do u sound to try and argue over an opinion? i dont think they faked the landings, i know the pics are mostly replicas of the poor quality ones they had. the suits was poor radiation repeling, thats fact
johnyb553 3 years ago
so why does the wheels on the buggy kick up dust and why does the footage show their feet kicking up dust? it's because most of the footage was shot on earth because the footage and photos they had was very poor
johnyb553 3 years ago
so no blast crater is normal? but their feet kicking up dust and leaving footprints says? rofl, common sense?
johnyb553 3 years ago
good job wiiwouldliketoplaymi!
entertaining and interesting!
cheers
19mars82 3 years ago
The Vacuum atmosphere only partially explains the lack of dust on the footpads. There's no atmospheric turbulence, so exhaust is deflected outward, blasting dust radially outward in a horizontal, laminar flow. ALSO, once the four foot long probes touched the soil, they cut the engine and the LEM free fell the rest of the way. There IS evidence of the engine exhaust under the LEMS. Click my name this posting, see my profile, follow the link to my Photobucket site.
satweavers 3 years ago
Bill runs a cat sanctuary... ya. See, he is crazy!
wiiwouldliketoplaymi 3 years ago
The conspiracy theorists need to look at the comments for this video
wiiwouldliketoplaymi 3 years ago
Exhaust plume? The moon has 1/6 the gravity of Earth. You don't need a whole lot of exhaust to propel your way out of the moon's gravitational pull, thus there would be no exhaust plume. Another myth busted.
Wolfm10412 3 years ago
wrong there is an exhaust plume if we had actually went. view the space shuttle it has a visible blue flume from the hydrazine, same as used in apollo
sforcesrcg 3 years ago
The fuel used didn't produce a visible plume
wiiwouldliketoplaymi 3 years ago
Engine noise? Seriously? Anyone who knows space travel 101 knows that where there is not atmosphere there is no noise. Last I checked the moon still has no atmosphere. There's at least on myth busted.
Wolfm10412 3 years ago
Wolf, you're forgetting something, the engine is attached to the Lem and causes vibrations. Since the inside contains air, it will have the medium required to transmit vibrations (ie. sound) that must be transmitted to the microphone. If you were outside of the craft, then with the absence of air, you would hear nothing.
PROFKNOX 2 years ago
Man did really land on the Moon. This has been proven by a National Geographic program explaining how all these so called 'errors' in the pictures appear.Jodrell Bank tracked the actual craft right up to landing and the russians tracked the LMs every movement. Start waking up and start believing.
bensisko16 4 years ago
I wanted to upload that but i couldnt find it!!
wiiwouldliketoplaymi 4 years ago
it's a great program, testimony to the real story. It's on Youtube as [NGC]Presents-Conspiracy Moon Landing. Anyway, good to hear from a fellow 'believer' so to speak.
bensisko16 3 years ago
i like your name
PBandJ50 4 years ago
Thanks i was obsessed with the wii and the next i in mii wouldnt fit so i went with mi instead of mii and wiiwouldliketoplay was taken so u get the idea
wiiwouldliketoplaymi 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Attention World: The films of the atomic explosions are FALSES see my videos " Atomic Bomb Does Not Exist by Andre Mauro " and an exclusive interview whith NASA`s administrator about the other fake mith "The Man on the Moon" - "Moongate - Moon`s Show by Andre Mauro " and my theory about the solar system " The Earth Doesn`t Turn Around the Sun by André Mauro" (version en espanhol mire " bomba atomica no existe "user cybercheguevara)
Happy new year for all ! Wake-up people !
MOONSSHOW
moonsshow 4 years ago
Not surprising this showed up on Fox. The network responsible for the "Alien Autopsy" footage, not to mention the entire Fox News network, which is widely know for it's conspiracy theorists.
juiceis420 4 years ago