Added: 4 years ago
From: wiiwouldliketoplaymi
Views: 20,158
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (62)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I'm not saying its real... Or fake, but there was also no sound due to the vacuum that space is... Just saying.

  • man never been there !

  • There is no noise in space it was real asswhipes

  • Martin Mull as narrator. Hoax is a hoax.

  • There's no sound in the landing footage because

    1. Space is a vacuum there is no sound.

    2. The microphones on cameras have a cut-off point of how loud the sound is. If the sound gets too loud, it stops recording audio because it doesn't want to be damaged.

  • ummmm sound waves cant travel through space because there arnt any air molecules for the wave to bounce on

  • hoax.

  • AS SIMPLE AS HOAX.

  • as simple as HOAX.

  • When the lander takes off back to earth, where is the huge exhaust plume (supposed to be pinkish in colour) that would emanate from nozzle?

  • no we didnt you are all tards look this up on google and you'll find many other theories that no matter how hard you try you won't be able to defend your point

  • @ 8:07 who is filming when the lander takes off back to Earth? It looks like the camera tilts up to follow it. If it was placed there, and then remote controlled, why didn't we do that all over the Moon so we could still be getting pictures to this day?

  • There's one thing not mentioned in this documentary:

    There is no sound in space (lacking oxygen).

    So the sound of the turbine isn't heard.

  • @DrUltraBeauty Exactly was i was going to write now, man, you beat me to it :D

  • Narrators EXACT words:

    "If the lander was so unstable and difficult to fly IN THE CONTROLLED ENVIORNMENT OF EARTH, then how could the LEM land six times, flawlessly, in the alien environment of the Moon?"

    Ummm ... since WHEN is the environment of Earth controllable?!? In fact, doesn't something like 80% or more of all airplane crashes occur during the take-offs and the landings BECAUSE of such UNCONTROLLABLE events such as sudden wind shear?

    No hoax, folks. We just question everthing now.

  • the moon landings were real do some research its amazing how stupid americans are

  • @fonziheights amazing how ignorant to outstanding lies even a monkey can see..yea

  • Everything aside, everysingle human being that has had some sort of education know that flag flapping around in the space does not happen. There has never been an explanation for this.

  • Flap flapping in space is possible - when it's touched. Easy as that.

  • NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has photographed all six Apollo moon landing sites. :)

  • Comment removed

  • So what,. the Google corp have brains, they are knew where the dangerous stuff was, and how to keep their "mouths" shut

  • The camera follows the lem up who filmed it,

  • the lunar rover had a camera on it, and it was timed perfectly for when they would go up

  • Jesus. FOX does everything they can to support these theories, from creative editing to flashing lights and whooshes to keep the knuckle-draggers entertained.

    It's funny how FOX viewers can make great leaps of faith to support conspiracy theories regarding the legitimacy of the moon landings, but they think climate change is an obvious hoax.

    We are all doomed.

  • only 1 evidence from those evidences can prove its 100 % fake. Specialy the flag part man they scrowed it up.lol

  • Why don't remote viewers look at the moon and see if they did go to the moon and see if the flag is there? It sounds like it was done at Area 51 to me and this place officially doesn't exist. The technology of the late sixties prevented anyone from going to the moon. It was not possible. Astronauts are talking in the cabin yet no rocket noise. Someday the real truth will come out and many will be shocked by it.

  • fldjgfglfsdlfdsugluhdfuyghkjuf­ghjfhgjfhgfjhgfjhgfjghfjghfjgh­fjgfisdol

  • ayam berak kapur

  • shuffle hardstyle republic

  • lol, i appolgise if it sounded attitudey, it wasn't intensional. we seem to agree on more than we dissagree

  • GOOGLE "AREA51 PRODUTIONS"! u will see the types of films they have had envolvments with

  • and as none of us have been out of earths atmosphere then we only have our opinions, and must have to accept that even our own opinions are from our own mind but are based upon evidence someone else told! so if they didnt tell u, then obviously u would never know! every thing u know someone else or someones book told u! that is 100% FACT! and if they didn't want u to know u would never know, lol ur books and theories are not ur own, u addopted them from books and telepothyvision set! all FACT!

  • i didn't make a provocative statment, i asked, so if no blast crater is normal from a jet engine, why does the buggy leave deap tracks and kick up dust upto 4ft into the air? why do their boots do the same? if u feal it is provocing then u must be very insecure, probably the reason u have gone offencive with ur age coment! well i'll tell u something! u only know what some else told u! u aint never been to the moon u dont have any experiance, u know what nasa told u and nothing more! thats fact!

  • lmao! ur so behined the point! nevermind, see masonic moon and moon landing a fact or fake, the pictures with airbrushed structures is ocvious evidence that those pics were taken at area51 studios, and some sheeple think they are structures on the moon roflmfao! if i come acroos as 10yrs how old do u sound to try and argue over an opinion? i dont think they faked the landings, i know the pics are mostly replicas of the poor quality ones they had. the suits was poor radiation repeling, thats fact

  • so why does the wheels on the buggy kick up dust and why does the footage show their feet kicking up dust? it's because most of the footage was shot on earth because the footage and photos they had was very poor

  • so no blast crater is normal? but their feet kicking up dust and leaving footprints says? rofl, common sense?

  • good job wiiwouldliketoplaymi!

    entertaining and interesting!

    cheers

  • The Vacuum atmosphere only partially explains the lack of dust on the footpads. There's no atmospheric turbulence, so exhaust is deflected outward, blasting dust radially outward in a horizontal, laminar flow. ALSO, once the four foot long probes touched the soil, they cut the engine and the LEM free fell the rest of the way. There IS evidence of the engine exhaust under the LEMS. Click my name this posting, see my profile, follow the link to my Photobucket site.

  • Bill runs a cat sanctuary... ya. See, he is crazy!

  • The conspiracy theorists need to look at the comments for this video

  • Exhaust plume? The moon has 1/6 the gravity of Earth. You don't need a whole lot of exhaust to propel your way out of the moon's gravitational pull, thus there would be no exhaust plume. Another myth busted.

  • wrong there is an exhaust plume if we had actually went. view the space shuttle it has a visible blue flume from the hydrazine, same as used in apollo

  • The fuel used didn't produce a visible plume

  • Engine noise? Seriously? Anyone who knows space travel 101 knows that where there is not atmosphere there is no noise. Last I checked the moon still has no atmosphere. There's at least on myth busted.

  • Wolf, you're forgetting something, the engine is attached to the Lem and causes vibrations. Since the inside contains air, it will have the medium required to transmit vibrations (ie. sound) that must be transmitted to the microphone. If you were outside of the craft, then with the absence of air, you would hear nothing.

  • Man did really land on the Moon. This has been proven by a National Geographic program explaining how all these so called 'errors' in the pictures appear.Jodrell Bank tracked the actual craft right up to landing and the russians tracked the LMs every movement. Start waking up and start believing.

  • I wanted to upload that but i couldnt find it!!

  • it's a great program, testimony to the real story. It's on Youtube as [NGC]Presents-Conspiracy Moon Landing. Anyway, good to hear from a fellow 'believer' so to speak.

  • i like your name

  • Thanks i was obsessed with the wii and the next i in mii wouldnt fit so i went with mi instead of mii and wiiwouldliketoplay was taken so u get the idea

  • Not surprising this showed up on Fox. The network responsible for the "Alien Autopsy" footage, not to mention the entire Fox News network, which is widely know for it's conspiracy theorists.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more