I dont think they should play him on the pk. Even if he can do it its obvious his main talent is scoring so If he gets tired from penalty killing he wont score as much.
@DIVAD291 First off look at what happened the year Gretzky scored his record 92 goals. They won the cup. If he scores 100 goals, it will be good for the team. And are you on crack? If he were to score one hundred goals he wouldn't have a plus minus of -20. You should start watching hockey before you say stuff like this.
@bags258 you didnt understand my point at all...you never learned to not take everything someone said literaaly?if he was to be removed from the pk...and i believe he shouldnt it would allow more goals its not something hard to understand...
@DIVAD291 No I understand what your saying 100%. Your just extrememly unrealistic. And I have no idea what PK time has to do with this conversation at all. Not to mention he doesn't even kill penalties. And your making no sense, you switching topics
@DIVAD291 Yeah u went from him scoring 100 goals to costing them 120, to penalty killing. Yes you are changing topics. You were the person that said him scoring 100 goals wouldn't matter, the thing that matters is the team. When he scores goals it helps the team. It's pretty simple.
@DIVAD291 I honestly haven't understood much of anything that you've said. Can you please explain it again and be a little more descriptive. Because were clearly on separate pages
@bags258 what does :No I understand what your saying 100%. means???my poin is simple...i will give a simple example...scoring 3 goals but allowing 2 is worth less than scoring 2 but allowing none...
@DIVAD291 So what? What does that have to do with your first comment I commented on about being a team player and him scoring 100 goals? You argument is pointless. Then you started talking about penalty killing. You make no sense. The point I was making was if Ovechkin were to score 100 goals it would help his team. Your whole goals for goals against thing is stupid. Odds are if he scores 100 goals, that means the team is doing well and has a shot at the cup. The only thing that matters.
@bags258 i see where is the problem...i was responding to someone who said he shouldnt play on the pk because he could score more... because he would be efficient on the pk he could stop more goals than the number of goals he could make which,for the team is better...the 100goals part is a fictional example...simply to demonstrate my point...i could have said something like:put ovechkin on all of the lines so he will score more!!!
@bags258 the first comment i posted which had absolutely nothing to do with you was in fact responding to someone else...so stop being an asshole about it shut your mouth and understand once and for all what i said without trying to mix it up to be an even bigger asshole about it...thx
@DIVAD291 lol, sorry if you didn't understand my last post I was making fun of both of us for confusing ourselfs. I'm not being an asshole, I'm not laughing at you I'm laughing with you
he is by far the ugliest man in the world.
crunchnut21 9 months ago
@crunchnut21 Last time i checked this was NHL hockey and not playgirl.
Wbjpen 8 months ago
maybe a year or two, not this year.
jkappianaq 11 months ago
@jkappianaq this is the hawks year again
BlackSunShreders 9 months ago
@BlackSunShreders lmafo hawks are out!
jkappianaq 9 months ago
Every years Ovechkins
chum93 1 year ago 5
nope
iLiKePaNkAcKeS 1 year ago
haha.. no this is not the year
DonkeyBonrProduction 1 year ago
i hope never they pay him too much money
they cant get any other good players
Chucknasty00 1 year ago
@Chucknasty00 he gets payed 9.5 mil a year, highest paid player in the league and we signed Backstrom for 6.7 mil a year
bags258 1 year ago
maybe not this year ovi so srry
theman19994 1 year ago
it wasnt the year bitch
go pens
CWAttack87 2 years ago
y u lookin up ovechkin?? ur russian star isnt good enough??
DQh0ck3y97 2 years ago
the kid at 0:10 is my neighbour
granyhump 2 years ago
those commercials are great! but i really wish they put them on network, NBC CBS and so forth...
chberan 3 years ago 2
I am not from the us, so where did they put them?
kubko87 3 years ago
Mostly on the NHL Network.
WristShot527 3 years ago
10 second clip is so cool to look at,imagine looking at ur fav player warming up for a game
irvpoker2007 3 years ago
what music is this
brianmccob 3 years ago
now he could start playing on the pk too i wouldnt be suprised if he does get 75 or more haha
Icedoggy924 3 years ago
I dont think they should play him on the pk. Even if he can do it its obvious his main talent is scoring so If he gets tired from penalty killing he wont score as much.
fatso2992 2 years ago
so what? who cares if ovechkin scores 100 goals...the important thing is the team... btw im not a caps fans. for me nobody is bigger than the team
DIVAD291 2 years ago
@DIVAD291 if he scores 100 goals, something tells me the team will be in pretty good shape
bags258 1 year ago
@bags258 not if nobody else score and the 100 goals cost 120 goals...
DIVAD291 1 year ago
@DIVAD291 First off look at what happened the year Gretzky scored his record 92 goals. They won the cup. If he scores 100 goals, it will be good for the team. And are you on crack? If he were to score one hundred goals he wouldn't have a plus minus of -20. You should start watching hockey before you say stuff like this.
bags258 1 year ago
@bags258 you didnt understand my point at all...you never learned to not take everything someone said literaaly?if he was to be removed from the pk...and i believe he shouldnt it would allow more goals its not something hard to understand...
DIVAD291 1 year ago
@DIVAD291 No I understand what your saying 100%. Your just extrememly unrealistic. And I have no idea what PK time has to do with this conversation at all. Not to mention he doesn't even kill penalties. And your making no sense, you switching topics
bags258 1 year ago
@bags258...yes im totaly the one switching topics...
DIVAD291 1 year ago
@DIVAD291 Yeah u went from him scoring 100 goals to costing them 120, to penalty killing. Yes you are changing topics. You were the person that said him scoring 100 goals wouldn't matter, the thing that matters is the team. When he scores goals it helps the team. It's pretty simple.
bags258 1 year ago
@bags258...as i said earlier...you didnt understand my point at all..
DIVAD291 1 year ago
@DIVAD291 I honestly haven't understood much of anything that you've said. Can you please explain it again and be a little more descriptive. Because were clearly on separate pages
bags258 1 year ago
@bags258 what does :No I understand what your saying 100%. means???my poin is simple...i will give a simple example...scoring 3 goals but allowing 2 is worth less than scoring 2 but allowing none...
DIVAD291 1 year ago
@DIVAD291 So what? What does that have to do with your first comment I commented on about being a team player and him scoring 100 goals? You argument is pointless. Then you started talking about penalty killing. You make no sense. The point I was making was if Ovechkin were to score 100 goals it would help his team. Your whole goals for goals against thing is stupid. Odds are if he scores 100 goals, that means the team is doing well and has a shot at the cup. The only thing that matters.
bags258 1 year ago
@bags258 i see where is the problem...i was responding to someone who said he shouldnt play on the pk because he could score more... because he would be efficient on the pk he could stop more goals than the number of goals he could make which,for the team is better...the 100goals part is a fictional example...simply to demonstrate my point...i could have said something like:put ovechkin on all of the lines so he will score more!!!
DIVAD291 1 year ago
@DIVAD291 lol, o okay. Yeah you were confusing me. so somewhere along the lines you thought I was someone else
bags258 1 year ago
@bags258 the first comment i posted which had absolutely nothing to do with you was in fact responding to someone else...so stop being an asshole about it shut your mouth and understand once and for all what i said without trying to mix it up to be an even bigger asshole about it...thx
DIVAD291 1 year ago
@DIVAD291 lol, sorry if you didn't understand my last post I was making fun of both of us for confusing ourselfs. I'm not being an asshole, I'm not laughing at you I'm laughing with you
bags258 1 year ago