Added: 3 years ago
From: nptelhrd
Views: 12,598
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • maaan...how dry

  • Very good and all but this is not Physics I

  • @JPFlaneur theoretical physics ftw :)

  • Nicely pitched and explained. Good to find.

  • cheap

  • HORRIBLE TONE AT THE BEGINING - ESPECIALLY IF YOUR WEARING HEADPHONES!!!!!!!!!!  Can you edit it out?

  • @ocularix...The inverse mapping theorem allows ANY change of coordinates, as long as the Jacobian of the transformation is not zero in the neighborhood of a required point. The change of coordinates being made is into so-called `canonical` coordinates. These new coordinates are special in that they reduce the pde to a simpler form.

  • Strictly speaking, he did not show that the Jacobian of the transformation (x,t)->(w1,w2) is different than zero in the neighborhood of a point of interest.

  • Beginning around 15:30 the good professor uses the second partial derivatives of x and t as equivalent to the quantities squared, without any explanation of why this would be valid? To me this casts a long shadow of doubt on this solution method!

  • thanks

  • iit chennai rocks

  • actually...'IIT' rocks.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more