I didn't say "googe Earth" I said DO A GOOGLE SEARCH ON "EARTH'S CORE". And I seriously doubt ANY scientist working for the USGS thinks the Earth's core is water. It's IRON, surrounded by molten iron. Water is NOT magnetic and could not provide a magnetic field. They know it's iron by how sizemic waves from earthquakes pass through it. I loolked up your "hydroplating" and it's complete Biblical nonsense Again, put down the book of myths (Bible) and read some actual SCIENCE books. Please.
Mythbusters ROFLMAO those crackpots =)). It was the gretaest blow to Russia and boast Russia we beat you to the moon. Russia stayed silent for we started helping Russia in their space program after Lunar Landing. Hmmm that is not a Theorist that is Factualist.
Hello "Popcorn" my co-worker in earth. I try think about every thing. I recognize, really I learn about everything. Im scientist and search all my life about the universe. Just some things dont need some kind of treatment. But I continue to search, and I fight witch thousands of others who try offer only true in statement in science. I really apreciate your contribution about your words. Sorry if I offend you.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Simply great Hollywood prodution and put inside all mind USA can for years. How dont delay about sound at there time? Today we have sound-delay if we talk in earth... I have dozens of doubts and not answer. The most ashemed act ever made for human been, this most lie in history.
@hbrznn - Google: New Apollo 17 Landing Photo Clearly Shows Lander, Flag / Also! They have reflective prisms that were placed there by the astronauts, and are regularly fired at with a laser. 2.5sec there and back. 5sec round trip. They also learned that the moon's orbit is increasing in radius. The Moon goes aproximatly 10cm farther away, every year.
They never played football or had a picnic. They played golf as a joke. I would trip over a stick to if I were in a spacesuit. They say that you have worse dexterity that a 3 year old when your inside one. Your comments also are confusing as you do not reference any paticular scene in the video.
And by the way judgelawyersdestroy after what you wrote about what you would have done if your son were gay (and most of the other tings u wrote) just show people that you are discriminating and compleately insane.
Ok so whitch provements do you have that the government have stolen anything? And WTF do you say that only Israel is going to have a economik upswing. You are just a retarded Know It All Hippie. A tip for you watch South-Park season 10 episode 2 Die Hippie Die Then you see how much what you wright here look like what potsmoking hippies say.
And by the way you got to be more reterded than i ever thought. You thhink you see a fraud in the NASA videos and audios you are really retarded.
And OMG the leader of North-Korea wants to be let alone all people inside northkorea are starving and get filled with propaganda every day. They wanna leave the country but they will get shot if they try. They arent even allowed internet there.
Your such a RETARD you dont know a shit about North-Korea or NASA so STFU
Sure sure the government are so terrible. They pay for hospitals roads securety police firemen. A society dont work without it. Its demography we choose who that have most power in the government. Just go back to your communist fantasies. Im glad your not in charge of a country cause then it is going to end up like the kommunist country North-Korea With a dickleader who wants to control all and use all th peoples money to build nuclear weapons.
Yeah they dont have a real government they send the money out make money and keeps al the profit. Learned it in school.
(you know that fun little place you never have been at.) And belive me i live in Norway i dont need money from fools like you or anyone else. The most scaring part of you is that you belive schools and goverment lies all the time. You got no intellect at all but you cosider yourelf smarter than all others. Get a life dickface.
And dont to be bad or discriminating, but i think you have a small psycik problem that makes you think everything that the government control is a lie. Yes i know the government have lied sometimes under terrorist attacs and may have misused your thrust, but they tried to dont make panic so nobody would get hurt. They arent evil liers like you think without them countries wouldnt function. The poor countries in africa for example need a good government to split the countries money to the people.
Not weird that you make up cospiracy theorys after what you just wrote You really got nothing bether to do. Never went to school, not socially accsepted no money i start to feel kinda bad for you... Two opitions can cause this. You are afraid of dont being accspeted and therefore only are alone and dont go to school. Or your a hippie...
You think you know everything about nasa and space tecknology, but u really know nothing. AND A RETARD LIKE YOU WOULDNT EVEN GET IN THE DOOR OF THE NASA BUILDING. Or wait a min maybe you have walked with a bunch of 8 year old kids and gotten a free look at the NASA building for kids under 10. And now you think you know everything. Read your own messages man you have nothing else to do in your sparetime than makeing up dumb-ass conspiracy theorys. A tip for u: Go to work eat and go back to sleep
If u search for conspiracy on google yes. U really are a retard. You think u know bether than everybody else but really you just make an ass of yourself and showing the world that you dont got anything bether to do than make up conspiracy theorys.
so u say satelites are not in space?.... how u explayn hubble? and by the way i did a little reserarch the space station is seffinatly in space. And yes i heard about the radioation on nat geo channel. It were a pretty new discovery sow now they protect the austronaut from it. It were reported because when ppl closed their eyes they saw something that looked like lightning. Just go on whit ur conspiracy life, but u wont get far in life if u deny the greatest achievements in human history...
The Eagle Has Landed Impressive,this is truly a "One small step for man One Giant Leap For Mankind" Amazing,i wish my country(Malaysia)Would send one of our citizens to the moon.Great job U.S.A and NASA! Keep up the good work and we might find Extraterestrial Life!
lol why u tards belive its a lie. Suddenly just one of you got an idea. IT IS A HOAX CAUSE I DONT UNDERSTAND IT. And the heat is absorbed by shielding. And satelite pictures just show the flag and the ppl who were there hundreds saw the rocket take of and they saw theo mean they landed in the water. This is sience so stfu conspiracy douches. This is a serious vid go place ur retard comments at vids who say they are hoax cause i wanna watch human history not conspiracy bullshit
Conspiracy Factualist know they went into space but the whole thing is did they land on the moon.
When the lunar landuing did happen the US was demoralized due to the CCCP the Russian Space Perogram. They beat us in every aspect to space.
We could have faked the lunar landing just to show Russia we beat them. And, just shortly after we landed on the moon we started helping CCCP. Since CCCP could have stated we faked the Lunar Landing.
Bright ass sun + heavy light filters on cameras = no STARS!!!!
Just like it is for the Space Shuttle and all of its footage and the pictures from the Voyager series ALL had no stars in the Back ground. Now, IF we faked all of this how do you explain all the Earth and other planet orbiting satalites up there...
heeavy lightfilters and bright sun means u cant see the stars no space missions from nasa have stars and if its all fake how u explain the satelites huh?
Well, after that rant showing your true character, I will no longer engage with you since you are unable to have a real debate. Your obviously can only berate another human being when you know nothing about me. I am not jewish, or homosexual and never will be. I was hoping to see a glimmer of a reasonable and decent human being who wanted to have an articulate debate based on facts, But obviously you are incapable of that.
Wow, now I am really impressed at your ability to be so articulate in presenting your facts. Facts are only facts when they can be verified. Just because you say so doesn't mean it is true.
I can tell from your clever and intelligent choice of words that you have first hand evidence and knowledge, including eye-witness reports that this is a hoax. You obviously have studied persuasive speech in order to convince others about your point of view and must have a doctorate degree in order to argue so intelligently. Congratulations. However, your approach has not convinced me.
I dont know if its just me but i guess nasa just doesnt have any fashion sense. the astronaut suits are too oversized and tacky they should have consulted armani for a more avant garde look
There are actually satellite photos of the lunar modules still on the surface of the moon on NASA's website... Which proves full-circle that the naysayers and conspiracy theorists are full of crap. Yet, they still try to find ways to discredit even those pictures.
Personally I thought the moon landing was a hoax, but after i did my research, i'm more convinced than ever that it actually did happen. And if you think about it, if I walked on the moon, and a bunch of young bastards accused me of faking it, that would be the biggest insult ever. No wonder Buzz Aldrin punched that douche in the face.
The reason for the perfect footprints was the fact that earth dust gets worn into small round prices that tumble off of each other. This is due to long exposure of wind, rain, and constant rubbing. Moon dust is constantly undisturbed. Under a microscope, each grain is sharb and jagged. When pressed together, they stay like puzzle prices. A boot was pressed into replicant moon dust inside of a vacuum tube in a mythbusters episode. It left a perfect indention.
The flag appears to be waving because it was held by a stick fixture so that there wasn't a wilty american flag on the moon. In the process, the flag was wrinkled. In still photography, this gives the illusion a a waving flag.
There is only one thing stopping me from believing in the moon landing and that is if there is no atmosphere on the moon which means no wind why did the american flag really look like it was blowing in the photos so if there was wind this would mean the footprints would be long gone but they are supposedley still there.
they've already proved all of the BS saying this never happened, and was in a Hollywood Studio...Actually, theres even an episode on Mythbusters where they prove everything saying it didnt happen, wrong. People just enjoy controversy.
Yes and I bet that was the thought nixon had just over forty years ago when he was so obsessed with getting there before russia he made it look suspicous
your dumb. if the world worked together we would already have a moon base, and would be on mars. but we put the stupid selfish people in charge. instead of putting scientists and the educated in charge of our countries.
Way to fall for Obamas Advertising Campain america, the shiny object getting wagged in front of ur faces wins again.
The moon rocks they brought back to earth. Scientists and geologists from around the world have seen them. The samples are very different from anything on earth.
I think people forget that the first time anything is accomplished it is always a little rough around the edges. It was truly an amazing accomplishment considering the technology that we had at the time.
tthis was real. my father was a guy working at launch control. he hooked up a camera to show me some of te flight. it was looking straight out the window. of course he asked the astronauts first :) but it shows em landing and walking out.
All of the points that the conspiracy theorists have brought up have been dismissed one by one comprehensively by facts. And yet they continue. Still, when did facts ever get in way of Americans believing in some very silly things?
Starlight needs a long exposure to show up. The film they were using wasn't that sensitive. Also we see stars on earth because the light is magnified through our atmoshere. Out in space it's black
The Moon's albedo (ability to reflect sunlight) is very high and with no atmosphere to traverse, daylight at the surface is much brighter than on Earth, outshining all dimer light sources (stars) similar to what light pollution does in big cities on Earth (which is why many if not all ground based telescopes are in the wilderness).
I dont really care if this was real or not but why can the material of the flag survive in such conditions? just wondering, was it specialy designed for space?
The man that delivered my child was a part of the team. He he is one of the most wonderful, honest and intelligent people I'll ever have the honor of knowing. I don't think he would have all the awards and mission patches on display in his office just to keep a lie going for 40 years. He's proud of them and has every right to be. He is a true Scientist and a commendable man.
Fake and sad that dimwit government-worshippers and authority-driven lemmings cannot see that fact. These Astro-Nots should be ashamed of their bullshit and lies. Truth is first ridiculed, then violently opposed, then accepted.
We are between stage 1 and 2 now. Eventually the sheeple will get to stage 3. Then Neil and his other 33-degree Mason buddies can be remembered for what they were - liars and scumbags.
It's sad that people can smoke so much crack that they're totally messed up in their little brains so that they can't realize the truth and all the evidence that IT WASN'T A HOAX!!!!!!
All you paranoid conspiracyfuckers can go to hell!
It's useless to try and discuss it with you inbred morons!
Ok, you freaky conspiracy theorists. Let me ask you something. Why do you think the Soviet scientists stayed silent on the Apollo Moon landing?
If a couple of undersexed American shills could figure out that it was a hoax, then I am sure the brightest minds of the Soviet Union could as well. And if they did, they had the best weapon to blow the US out of the water - but they didn't. So what gives?
Doubting something unconditionally is not the hallmark of intelligence. For a suspicion to be a sign of intelligence, it must first be backed up by unmovable and legitimate reasons.
At any rate, you are only doubting the Apollo Moon landing because half-assed documentaries with spooky music told you so. Who's the sheeple now?
I am a Conspiracy Factualist. And, the fact with Sioviet Suilence is that shortly after Lunar Landing we helped the CCCP build up there space program. Anyone thinking Russia was our enemy is smoking too much crack.
Well that makes no sence cause if the Russian space program knew we faked it they would state it 100% Russias space program was the proudest thing the country got. Nothing was more important to them! And by the way we got reflectors on the moon to prove we have been there aswell as satelite photos of man made eqipment... SO is this really an issue?
No they would not. If not for us Russia would never have made a Space Shuttle. And, reflectors on the moon. We have satellites on the moon. Can easily put reflectors on a satellite and have it land there. Russia has more satellites on the moon than the US.
Why do you think we cannot go to the moon now? Like really if we truly landed on the moon we just improve and duplicate it. You do not lose that type of technology.
We did not have the shielding to go through Van Allen Belt.
Omg not that bullshit again... YES we have been to the moon YES the van allen belt is radioctive but not enough to kill you inside a space shuttle! And OMG of coarse we could go to the moon again! But we have done it many times that race is ower!!! Its Mars we try to get to now!
@TheStormchaser1 Russia would have cried out LOUD if USA faked it, because they to tried very hard to be there first, but failed. They had all means of discovering a fake immediately. We could go to the Moon again in less than 10 years with the same, or improved technology, if somebody was willing to put up the billions it would cost. Nobody is. The taxpayers (and politicians) consider it "not important enough".
@YDDES Correct. But, to keep in silence look at after fact we helped Russia progress more into space. If we could go to the moon we would have started colonized 30 years ago. We had the money and resources and we did not. Why? Lunar landing was fake.
@TheStormchaser1 USA "helped" Russia after USSR collapsedn by letting them in on the ISS. Up until Apollo USSR was leading the spacerace. And, why colonising the Moon? It would cost hundreds of billions. What's to gain? Even if there were diamonds all over the surface, it would be too expensive to bring them back to Earth. Apollo was prematurely "put to sleep" because the interest faded after the race was won, and the majority of the public considered moontrips a waste of money.
@TheStormchaser1 Why fake a moon-landing in the first place? President Kennedy asked his science advisors what USA could do to beat USSR. He asked if they for example could build a spacestation or land a man on the Moon. The experts said: Land on the Moon. If they thought it impossible, why not use the same money and technology to build a spacestation? It would have been insane to waste so much money on a fake, since even the military could have used a station for many purposes.
@YDDES@YDDES You ever heard of Operation Paperclip. Both sides Russia and US had Nazis in the space race building better rockets. Modern day Nazi Propaganda which is still practiced today by the Nazi Fourth Reich. Both Russia and US had Hitler's Propagandists during Space Race. So it was one huge Propaganda Machine to fuel hatred to both countries. That is your smoking gun Space Race was a Hoax of the Propaganda Machine you are victim to.
@TheStormchaser1 That last remark of Yours makes no sense at all regarding the space exploration and lunar landings. And, for Your education: The Germans employed by USA and USSR after the war were rocket scientists building the V2's, not Goebbels propagadists. Yor talk is just adesperate try to avoid questions about facts regarding the lunar landings. And, there still was no reason to spend that money on a fake, when a spacestation could have been built instead.
@YDDES Who do you think put fluoride in our water supply? Propagandists from Nazi Germany. Nazis still are in all branches of Russian and US Government. Nazis never died they like pumping us with propaganda. Like the Lunar Landing to turn a blind eye to Vietnam. When Vietnam ended the Lunar Landings ended. It was to keep from worrying about Vietnam.
@YDDES My family Bush Family which all of us are indoctrinated in the thinking of a Global Nationalization of a One World Government and Religion. My cousin Obama was also indoctrinated. Read Operation Paperclip. So YOU go to a library and you will truly find it is an idealogy of a Gloablized Nationalization of a One World Government and Religion that was why everyone in Europe was assimilated or exterminated and why it is going on today.
@TheStormchaser1 And that's why all the scientists, and all the aerospace companies in the USA (with the help of the rest of the world) decided to fool You about some lunar landings? Give me a break......
@YDDES The biggest propaganda machine is the TV. People sit in day in, day out, night after night feeding you whatever bullshit they want to feed you. So YOU are the fool. Why the hell do you think it ended at the end of the Vietnam War? People would start questioning if it was real since people did not worry if they were going to be drafted. NASA should have never archived the lunar landings. Then people would not start questioning since they are no longer stressed out due to the war.
@TheStormchaser1 In real life, it ended because the politicians discovered that the public lost interest in lunar landings after the USSR had been beaten to the Moon, and cut the fundings. NASA had planned to go on with small habitats, bigger rovers and even small "Lunar flyers". Those were already on the drawing boards. Why spend money on that planning if it wasn't real? And, I still ask You: WHY spend so much money on a hoax, instead of a spacestation? It's YOU who has been fooled...
@YDDES We had a space station, back in '74 that was a waste of money. Since it was never hardly used. Skylab. And, it cost the government a lot less to hoax a lunar landing then going through emotional anguish of losing a loved one in Vietnam. Kept many disabled soldiers watching the lunar landings than protesting the Vietnam War. So it benefited the government. Since the 2 lunar craters which were filmed are here on this planet at a closed down Area 51.
@TheStormchaser1 "Skylab never hardly used"? 2.000 hours of scientific work was logged, and hundreds of thousands pictures and films taken of, among other objects, the Sun and the Earth. It was too small to do experiments now possible on the ISS. The military wanted, and planned, small spacestations (the MOL for example), but their fundings were cut. To fund a hoax, easily detected? I don't think any grieving relatives were consulated by a moon-trip. But USSR was beaten in the race.
@YDDES Wrong Russia beat us in every aspect. And, the reason why they stopped their cosmonauts were being killed. The problem was they did not have a manufacturing plant and assembly on same spot. They needed to disassemble and rebuild and rockets went BOOM!!! You should always have as few booster rockets as possible, Russia had 30. 1 failed it would blow It did advance our technology.
The only astronauts which looks like they went through the Van Allen Belt is those of Apollo 13.
@TheStormchaser1 Yes, up till Apollo USSR beat USA. They didn't "stop" anything. Soyus was delayed by two fatal accidents. But it went on. Even USA had factories for the rockets and spaceships spread among several companies over the nation. So, what?. I know the N-1 failed because of too- many engines in the first stage. But anyhow: They really TRIED to fly to the Moon, just as USA did. So You believe that Apollo 13 went out behind the belts, but no other Apollos? Why?
@YDDES The eyes. You need to face them face to face. The whole Apollo 13 astronauts looks like they had huge doses of radiation. While the rest of the Apollo Astronauts look like they stayed aboard skylab or orbited the Earth. I hate when people say Apollo 13 was fake when they are the only ones which went through the Van Allen Belt.
With today's technology we can build radiation proof ships to go through Van Allen.
@TheStormchaser1 All right, You aren't serious. Just talking rubbish. Because Skylab didn't exist during the lunar flights. I'm not interested in this stupid "conversation" anymore. Hope You get well.
@YDDES I screwed up I talked to fast. I wasn't born when the landings happened. I was born the year after Skylab went up. I thought last lunar landing was 1975. But, thank GOD I live next to NASA and corrected me as 1972. And, Skylab was after. So it is easy to confuse if you were not even born. And, lived in the time period. So it is easy to get dates and years screwed up.
But, fact is skin and eyes of Apollo 13 astronauts looks like they had high dosages of radiation.
@TheStormchaser1 All right, I can answer You on this one. Not interested in telling too much about myself on the Net, the datas regarding my person here on You tube are not always the absolute truth. Actually, I WAS born then, and followed the whole Apollo project extensively from the start to the end. I have A LOT of printed material from those days, both from newspapers and scientific publications from several countries. That's why I know man went to the Moon.
@YDDES You do not happen to have had a HAM radio back then. I need a smoking gun lunar landing took place. I need someone with a HAM which heard the lunar landing. I have been looking for someone which heard it on a HAM radio.
@TheStormchaser1 No, but since I've worked with the public radio in Sweden, I know that Swedish radioastronomers followed the Apollos from "Råöobservatoriet".
@TheStormchaser1 What makes You competent to determine if someone have had a high dose of radiation, by looking at his eyes on a photo??? No, You can't be serious.
@YDDES All those still living from 1995 to present. I have met a good majority. And, the eyes which tell all was a Shipmate Captain Lovell. His eyes told all.
The only one who I did not meet was Fred Haise. And, Swigert died in 1982. I was born in '74 and saw Swigert when I was 6 years old. I wish I was 14 years older back in 1980 when I met him. I would have looked at his pupils.
Watch Buzz's eyes when he speaks. They twitch and roll. He is being creative,.
@TheStormchaser1 Oh, so all the scientists all over the world has been fooled for 40 years, but You see the truth in the pupils of a person? Forgive me for not being convinced...
@YDDES If you see peoples eyes roll up to the right they are using creative side of brain. They are lying. And, yes that is how many police tell if someone is lying. They roll their eyes and not directly in their eyes.
Take Bush Jr a classic case of habitual lying. Another thing to look for is licking the lips. Licking oif lips means you are grasping for words to tell a lie. Learn police interrogation and it is all things we look for.
@YDDES You wnat the smoking gun Lunar Landing was fake. There are 2 craters at Area 51. Not once do you see the astronauts face in the space helmet. So everyone was faked.
Every Astronaut just orbited Earth except for Apollo 13 which something happened. Because happens they were close to a crater filled with water. And, none of the lunar landings brought back water.
It is called the select few can fool the many. All it took was 10-20 people to fool the thousands on the project.
@TheStormchaser1 10-20 people to calculate and send a Saturn V on a trajectory around the Earth, instead of to the Moon? 10-20 people to align the antennasall over the world to... where??? An orbiting satellite instead of the Moon??? What You say here makes no sense at all. Nor does Your talk about "rolling eyes" and "licking lips". I suspect You are trying to make a fool of Your self for some reason...
@YDDES With the astronauts inside. Astronauts had to be inside so they can script read. Then the people filming will know. The people in the space suits at Area 51. Every NASA employee could be fooled. Majority of personnel is within Area 51 so will not know what is going on. And, film. When done a perfect DisNASAy film. They should have screamed Holy fucking shit we fuckin made it to the moon fuck you Commie Bastards. Instead of the low monotone voice one small step for man.
@TheStormchaser1 You forget one thing: These men were all the top of the top military test pilots. Very proud of their profession. They almost never screamed "horray" or boasted about their accomplishments. That would have looked bad in front of their colleagues. Cool and calm in the face of imminent death risk. Also: If one knows that what one is about to say will be historical, one think it over a little, I think. And what about the radio transmissions from the way to, and on the Moon?
@YDDES We always prevailed at the enemy. There was no prevail. Military would have always smeared a Commie Red in the face if given a chance. I think Walt Disney wrote the script it sounds like the perfect "Disney Image".
The radio transmissions is the "smoking gun" since they need to be on an exact frequency of the Apollo Missions. If they were not on the exact frequency all they would hear is static.
Live feed went to Australia then to US the real reason of delay.
@TheStormchaser1 The radio frequencies were no secrets. No problems there. Australia was used as the recieving point only when the Moon was at that side of the Earth, and couldn,t be reached directly from USA. You are wrong about those "first words". Actually, Armstrong was chosen to step out first, because he was formally a CIVILIAN (but had been testing military aircraf before being an astronaut). Also, the plaque left on the Moon said: "for the whole world".
@TheStormchaser1 All frequencies used by non military spacecraft, both American and Russian, were made public by an international agreement. I don't have the Apollos frequencies available in front of me, but I happen to have some others in an older publication: Sputnik 1: 20.002 mc and 40.005 mc, Explorer 1: 108.00 and 108,03 mc, Ranger 1: 960.1 and 960.05 mc for example. Anyone could listen in on the Apollos just as any other non-military spacecraft. You are just guessing that no one could...
@YDDES Apollo 11 had radio frequencies between 2000-2300 MhZ. There should have been lots and lots of radio chatter in those frequencies and not just the lunar lander. What they should have done wa shave the Lunar Roover do a continuous playback which could still be heard today for each lunar landing. You also had the uplink antenna on a different frequency. So with each one had the whole 2000 GhZ -3000 GhZ on a continuous loop. So each one can be verified to this very day.
@TheStormchaser1 Phew! The lunar landings had two purposes: Beat the USSR and scientific researche. To put a radio transmitter on the Moon just to try to convince ignorant people decades later would be a waste. Of critical payload weight and of limited radio frequencies. And, not the LEM, nor the Rover had any solar cells to feed a transmitter for a longer time. The equipment left behind included a transmitter fed by a radioactive isoptope, but it wasn't designed to to send for decades.
@TheStormchaser1 You seem to search for new "anomalies" all the time, when those You present are refuted. I advice You to take a deep breath and dive into the VAST pile of REAL information about the lunar landings that actually exist. Can You present just ONE "smoking gun" that really proves that the whole Apollo program was a fake?
@YDDES Mop HAM'S picked it up. My Uncle HAM Operator never recieved to busy attached to TV.. The Propaganda News Reporters should have told all HAM Operators get off the TV and listen to frequency 2275.5 MgZ The HAM Radio is the Smoking Gun. Next Smoking Gun is the craters at Area 51. A closed defunct base empty yet still the most highly guarded base. Due to craters you can see from satellite photos. Those were the craters used.
@TheStormchaser1 So all the lunar landing photos and films were produced outdoors at night with only ONE bright lightsource high up in the sky? No wind at all to move the flags or stir up the dust... Whoops! Well, if Your uncle didn't listen, many others around the world did. Including the Rusians. They even had "fishing trawlers" packed with antennas in the ocean outside Cape Kennedy. At all times. "Smoking gun". Yeah, right...
@YDDES People who had HAMs only watched TV. I have not met one person for over 15 years who heard it on a personal HAM radio. I sometimes still pick up broadcasts from Voyager.
The shadows from the Moon. MJajority of the camera equipment should have been destroyed by sun exposure. All you have is direct sunlight on the moon. NASA cameras have picked up stars. On the Moon there are none and with no atmosphere there should be infinite stars shown.
@TheStormchaser1 Why should the sunlight have destroyed the cameras? Explain, please. Because the sunlight didn't destroy the cameras on the Geminis or on the ISS. No NASA cameras have picked up stars on the same pictures as properly exposed brightly sunlit objects. Anyone who knows even just a little about basic photography understands that. To photograph stars without any planet, spaceship or other object in sight is of course easy, if You hold the camera still during the long exposure.
@YDDES How sunlight destroys all cameras. Direct pointing at the sun. They still remind people do not point the camera at the sun. Also even with the best shades on they would have been blinded by the sun several times over. Surprised none of them fell from the sun being bombarded at them.
@TheStormchaser1 The astronauts didn't point the cameras at the sun. They photographed the Moons surface. And sunlight doesn't destroy cameras using film, only electronic ones (TV and digital). All stills from the Moon were caught on film.
Now, what about the stars? Do You still state that there should be stars in the sky above the brightly illuminated surface?
@YDDES Actually 1 camera was destroyed by sunlight. Research it.
What will beat the Conspiracy is a Lunar Landing in 5-10 years. It will shut every conspiracy theorist up. A Lunar Landing now has zero possibilty it could be a hoax in today's age.
@TheStormchaser1 That was not a Hasselblad (the still camera with film). Ahum... the stars?...
A lunar landing now could be faked just as little as then, because of, among other obvious things, the possibility of tracking every single spacecraft all the way to the Moon and back.
Actually, there's NOTHING substantial pointing to a hoax. It was all started by a few smart persons making things up to sell their books and videos to gullible people.
@YDDES Those books have more facts backed up than NASA can ever dream. If the Lunar Landing was not a hoax why can't they do a lunar landing now. NASA claims they lost the technology to land again. How can you lose technology when NASA "Keeps Advancing" So Lunar Landing was a Hoax. They should repeat what they did some 40 years ago. This was the biggest Conspiracy as JFK.
They should just say let's prove the conspirators wrong and launch a new lunar landing. Then no one can debunk.
@TheStormchaser1 Would You spend billions just to make ignorant people shut up? It's no use to use 60's technology to go to the Moon again, and NASA hasn't got that money now. Who should pay? If Obama hadn't killed the Orion-program, USA had gone back when vew spacecraft had been built.
@YDDES Obama killed it when he read the classified reports we never landed on the moon. And, if the new astronauts do not see the things left behind are not there people will riot.
@YDDES They should take pictures with HUBBLE those could do close ups of the Lunar Lander. They want to feed the Conspiracy Theorists. Instead of debunking.
I think it is time for NASA to prove they did a Lunar Landing by Landing on the Moon in the next 5-10 years. I want to see NASA land on the moon in this time period. That way they can prove to all of us they can land on the moon and shut everyone up.
@TheStormchaser1 If You just take the trouble to get some facts abot the Hubble telescope, You'll find out why it can't take any high resolution pictures of the equipment left behind on the Moon (it doesn't magnify as much as You might think, and the most sensitive camera demands a too long exposure-time to photograph a fast moving object like the Moon).
@YDDES The Moon is not a fast moving object. The whole universe is a fast moving object. The moon does not revolve like the Earth does. That is why you see the Man on the Moon in every country. And, HUBBLE does move around quite frequently. Have you ever seen HUBBLE Earth pictures. Think, Department of Defense helped with the project. What is NRO, NASA, and Department of Defense hiding which is classified?
@TheStormchaser1 Compared to the distant galaxies, and even the planets in our Solar system, the Moon moves fast, seen from Hubble, because it's so close. No, I can't say I've seen Earth pictures taken by Hubble. Where can I find them? Why would the DoD use Hubble, when their spy satellites, which can even change their orbits, can photograph cars and people on the ground?
@YDDES That is the best question why would HUBBLE be used. According to Corning Glass. They use HUBBLE when there are NO satellites in the vicinity. Our satellites along with Russia cover close to 75% of the planet. HUBBLE is actually hardly used except in emergency scenerios. It does not have full capability like our spy satellites. It is just one huge still photography camera
Go to Corning Glass. They are the creators of the lense and will tell more than NASA.
@YDDES You and me are smart. But, it does not take a rocket scientist to know that why does not one satellite ever take a close up photo of the abandoned Apollo Mission still on the moon. They can take a picture of a license plate from space and clearly read the letters. Yet they cannot take one picture of the lunar landing remains.
@TheStormchaser1 Phew! The spy satellites orbit Earth, not Moon! Of course they can't photograph small objects over there. There's no scientific reason to send a very expensive "spy camera" to orbit the Moon. Who would pay for that? The satellites photographing it are just for mapping; that is photographing large areas, not small objects like boulders (and LEM's). After all, the satellites ARE photographing the landing areas, and there are many pictures of the LEM's. What more do You ask for?
@YDDES Cost would be less than 10 million. Chunk change for the Federal Government. And, not me look at how many milions of people think the Lunar Landing is a Hoax.
@TheStormchaser1 10 millions is much for NASA. The sum can be better used. For scientific research for example. If "the government" should be spending a lot of money any time some uneducated people doubt something, where should that lead? Let them doubt and be ignorant about anything they want. Why should the government or NASA care? And why should the taxpayers money be spent for it?
I didn't say "googe Earth" I said DO A GOOGLE SEARCH ON "EARTH'S CORE". And I seriously doubt ANY scientist working for the USGS thinks the Earth's core is water. It's IRON, surrounded by molten iron. Water is NOT magnetic and could not provide a magnetic field. They know it's iron by how sizemic waves from earthquakes pass through it. I loolked up your "hydroplating" and it's complete Biblical nonsense Again, put down the book of myths (Bible) and read some actual SCIENCE books. Please.
Mozart1220 11 months ago
Mythbusters ROFLMAO those crackpots =)). It was the gretaest blow to Russia and boast Russia we beat you to the moon. Russia stayed silent for we started helping Russia in their space program after Lunar Landing. Hmmm that is not a Theorist that is Factualist.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
Kinda funny how the lunar mapping probes that have been sent can see the remains of the Apollo missions on the surface (the LEM descent module).
I guess being a conspiracy theorist means you let other, less intelligent people do your thinking for you.
tyrrax 2 years ago
Ummmm you forget there are many satellites on the moon. Mainly from Russia back in the early 60's.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
Hello "Popcorn" my co-worker in earth. I try think about every thing. I recognize, really I learn about everything. Im scientist and search all my life about the universe. Just some things dont need some kind of treatment. But I continue to search, and I fight witch thousands of others who try offer only true in statement in science. I really apreciate your contribution about your words. Sorry if I offend you.
hbrznn 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Simply great Hollywood prodution and put inside all mind USA can for years. How dont delay about sound at there time? Today we have sound-delay if we talk in earth... I have dozens of doubts and not answer. The most ashemed act ever made for human been, this most lie in history.
hbrznn 2 years ago
motherfucker
JoussImagen 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hbrznn - Google: New Apollo 17 Landing Photo Clearly Shows Lander, Flag / Also! They have reflective prisms that were placed there by the astronauts, and are regularly fired at with a laser. 2.5sec there and back. 5sec round trip. They also learned that the moon's orbit is increasing in radius. The Moon goes aproximatly 10cm farther away, every year.
Bugstomper2 2 years ago
Simply, Amazing!
laxattack1020 2 years ago 2
They never played football or had a picnic. They played golf as a joke. I would trip over a stick to if I were in a spacesuit. They say that you have worse dexterity that a 3 year old when your inside one. Your comments also are confusing as you do not reference any paticular scene in the video.
IdontlikeusingLOL 2 years ago
Your the embodiment of every single retarded conspiracy theorist out there.
IdontlikeusingLOL 2 years ago
And by the way judgelawyersdestroy after what you wrote about what you would have done if your son were gay (and most of the other tings u wrote) just show people that you are discriminating and compleately insane.
Hatchatfatbat 2 years ago
Wow
guniformtango 2 years ago
Haha your the fool :P
Hatchatfatbat 2 years ago
c`mon a NASA video and talking about Society and TAXES! u should be talking about science
BlaCkJack36O 2 years ago
Ok so whitch provements do you have that the government have stolen anything? And WTF do you say that only Israel is going to have a economik upswing. You are just a retarded Know It All Hippie. A tip for you watch South-Park season 10 episode 2 Die Hippie Die Then you see how much what you wright here look like what potsmoking hippies say.
Hatchatfatbat 2 years ago
And by the way you got to be more reterded than i ever thought. You thhink you see a fraud in the NASA videos and audios you are really retarded.
And OMG the leader of North-Korea wants to be let alone all people inside northkorea are starving and get filled with propaganda every day. They wanna leave the country but they will get shot if they try. They arent even allowed internet there.
Your such a RETARD you dont know a shit about North-Korea or NASA so STFU
Hatchatfatbat 2 years ago
So now u say that you hate homosexuals and jews...
Hatchatfatbat 2 years ago
i do ...and so?
bobbya16 2 years ago
continue of the of the last reply:
5. You are the retard.
6. Can u use your 10 IQ to maybe understand that your wrobg and the rest of the world nows much bether than 1 retarded person.
Hatchatfatbat 2 years ago
Aha interesting appereantly you hate homos so your discriminating. And ok
1. WE chose the government
2. YES the government are highly paid cause they get elected out after a while and its a big job.
3. The government dont steal a shit they use the money to create a society.
4. And yes i know a lot about North-Korea cause im livin
Hatchatfatbat 2 years ago
Sure sure the government are so terrible. They pay for hospitals roads securety police firemen. A society dont work without it. Its demography we choose who that have most power in the government. Just go back to your communist fantasies. Im glad your not in charge of a country cause then it is going to end up like the kommunist country North-Korea With a dickleader who wants to control all and use all th peoples money to build nuclear weapons.
Hatchatfatbat 2 years ago
Yeah they dont have a real government they send the money out make money and keeps al the profit. Learned it in school.
(you know that fun little place you never have been at.) And belive me i live in Norway i dont need money from fools like you or anyone else. The most scaring part of you is that you belive schools and goverment lies all the time. You got no intellect at all but you cosider yourelf smarter than all others. Get a life dickface.
Hatchatfatbat 2 years ago
And dont to be bad or discriminating, but i think you have a small psycik problem that makes you think everything that the government control is a lie. Yes i know the government have lied sometimes under terrorist attacs and may have misused your thrust, but they tried to dont make panic so nobody would get hurt. They arent evil liers like you think without them countries wouldnt function. The poor countries in africa for example need a good government to split the countries money to the people.
Hatchatfatbat 2 years ago
Not weird that you make up cospiracy theorys after what you just wrote You really got nothing bether to do. Never went to school, not socially accsepted no money i start to feel kinda bad for you... Two opitions can cause this. You are afraid of dont being accspeted and therefore only are alone and dont go to school. Or your a hippie...
Hatchatfatbat 2 years ago
You think you know everything about nasa and space tecknology, but u really know nothing. AND A RETARD LIKE YOU WOULDNT EVEN GET IN THE DOOR OF THE NASA BUILDING. Or wait a min maybe you have walked with a bunch of 8 year old kids and gotten a free look at the NASA building for kids under 10. And now you think you know everything. Read your own messages man you have nothing else to do in your sparetime than makeing up dumb-ass conspiracy theorys. A tip for u: Go to work eat and go back to sleep
Hatchatfatbat 2 years ago
its funny how some retards think that things like the moonwalk and the haulacost or however you spell it isnt real
meaux4 2 years ago
If u search for conspiracy on google yes. U really are a retard. You think u know bether than everybody else but really you just make an ass of yourself and showing the world that you dont got anything bether to do than make up conspiracy theorys.
Hatchatfatbat 2 years ago
_|_
ThePhc 2 years ago
so u say satelites are not in space?.... how u explayn hubble? and by the way i did a little reserarch the space station is seffinatly in space. And yes i heard about the radioation on nat geo channel. It were a pretty new discovery sow now they protect the austronaut from it. It were reported because when ppl closed their eyes they saw something that looked like lightning. Just go on whit ur conspiracy life, but u wont get far in life if u deny the greatest achievements in human history...
Hatchatfatbat 2 years ago
The Eagle Has Landed Impressive,this is truly a "One small step for man One Giant Leap For Mankind" Amazing,i wish my country(Malaysia)Would send one of our citizens to the moon.Great job U.S.A and NASA! Keep up the good work and we might find Extraterestrial Life!
crysis888 2 years ago 3
@crysis888 Imagine a space craft made of bamboo, crafted by child labor...LOL.
supressorgrid 1 year ago
lol why u tards belive its a lie. Suddenly just one of you got an idea. IT IS A HOAX CAUSE I DONT UNDERSTAND IT. And the heat is absorbed by shielding. And satelite pictures just show the flag and the ppl who were there hundreds saw the rocket take of and they saw theo mean they landed in the water. This is sience so stfu conspiracy douches. This is a serious vid go place ur retard comments at vids who say they are hoax cause i wanna watch human history not conspiracy bullshit
Hatchatfatbat 2 years ago 2
Conspiracy Factualist know they went into space but the whole thing is did they land on the moon.
When the lunar landuing did happen the US was demoralized due to the CCCP the Russian Space Perogram. They beat us in every aspect to space.
We could have faked the lunar landing just to show Russia we beat them. And, just shortly after we landed on the moon we started helping CCCP. Since CCCP could have stated we faked the Lunar Landing.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
omg IT IS POSSIBLE U DUMBASS how else do you expain satelites. ANd the mars rover u piese of crap. Tere are even sat pictures proving it. RETARD.
Hatchatfatbat 2 years ago
LOL ok then how u explain satelites dumbass?
Hatchatfatbat 2 years ago
your a retard...
OrionSamson 2 years ago
LOL retards belive the moonlanding were a fake???
Hatchatfatbat 2 years ago
Bright ass sun + heavy light filters on cameras = no STARS!!!!
Just like it is for the Space Shuttle and all of its footage and the pictures from the Voyager series ALL had no stars in the Back ground. Now, IF we faked all of this how do you explain all the Earth and other planet orbiting satalites up there...
You moon hoaxers need to get over it.
OrionSamson 2 years ago
y your right there ofc the moon landin were real :D
Hatchatfatbat 2 years ago
Im tlakig about My Black cock in Yuor mouth man
have some senses
SlaveOfGod1993 2 years ago
you might even be one of the astronauts. I'm still not believing. Where are the stars?
bebetodas 2 years ago
That question has been explained, patiently, so many times and for so long that only someone who is fuckass retarded would ask it. Someone like you.
TheJomogogo 2 years ago
heeavy lightfilters and bright sun means u cant see the stars no space missions from nasa have stars and if its all fake how u explain the satelites huh?
Hatchatfatbat 2 years ago
our government wouldn't lie to us.
if they say we went to the moon, then we did.
if they say the economy is getting better then it is.
if they say higher taxes are good for us, then it is.
if they say the iraq war is just, then it is.
if they say NAFTA, CAFTA is on the right track, then it is.
if they say one currency is best, then it is.
if they say universal health care is cure-all, then it is.
Because our government will not lie or lead us astray.
brrtown 2 years ago
Believe that and your moronic. But I salute your patriotism.
jimbob150555 2 years ago
jimbob150555,
I was being sarcastic. I thought it was obvious.
brrtown 2 years ago
U.S.A FOREVER
saymonification 2 years ago
Well, after that rant showing your true character, I will no longer engage with you since you are unable to have a real debate. Your obviously can only berate another human being when you know nothing about me. I am not jewish, or homosexual and never will be. I was hoping to see a glimmer of a reasonable and decent human being who wanted to have an articulate debate based on facts, But obviously you are incapable of that.
ragonswife 2 years ago 2
calm down man , u needa put a cock in your mouth, and calm down
SlaveOfGod1993 2 years ago
Is everyone on here a homo ??
jimbob150555 2 years ago
Wow, now I am really impressed at your ability to be so articulate in presenting your facts. Facts are only facts when they can be verified. Just because you say so doesn't mean it is true.
ragonswife 2 years ago
I can tell from your clever and intelligent choice of words that you have first hand evidence and knowledge, including eye-witness reports that this is a hoax. You obviously have studied persuasive speech in order to convince others about your point of view and must have a doctorate degree in order to argue so intelligently. Congratulations. However, your approach has not convinced me.
ragonswife 2 years ago
I want to go to the moon now.
tkmanister 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lol go to google and search: cakefarts
lmaooo
5dumbasses 2 years ago
I dont know if its just me but i guess nasa just doesnt have any fashion sense. the astronaut suits are too oversized and tacky they should have consulted armani for a more avant garde look
leklek69 2 years ago
There are actually satellite photos of the lunar modules still on the surface of the moon on NASA's website... Which proves full-circle that the naysayers and conspiracy theorists are full of crap. Yet, they still try to find ways to discredit even those pictures.
bluetoaster8822 2 years ago 4
Personally I thought the moon landing was a hoax, but after i did my research, i'm more convinced than ever that it actually did happen. And if you think about it, if I walked on the moon, and a bunch of young bastards accused me of faking it, that would be the biggest insult ever. No wonder Buzz Aldrin punched that douche in the face.
videomissionary 2 years ago 2
The reason for the perfect footprints was the fact that earth dust gets worn into small round prices that tumble off of each other. This is due to long exposure of wind, rain, and constant rubbing. Moon dust is constantly undisturbed. Under a microscope, each grain is sharb and jagged. When pressed together, they stay like puzzle prices. A boot was pressed into replicant moon dust inside of a vacuum tube in a mythbusters episode. It left a perfect indention.
NoogahOogah 2 years ago
The flag appears to be waving because it was held by a stick fixture so that there wasn't a wilty american flag on the moon. In the process, the flag was wrinkled. In still photography, this gives the illusion a a waving flag.
NoogahOogah 2 years ago
There is only one thing stopping me from believing in the moon landing and that is if there is no atmosphere on the moon which means no wind why did the american flag really look like it was blowing in the photos so if there was wind this would mean the footprints would be long gone but they are supposedley still there.
Condemnedxbox 2 years ago
they've already proved all of the BS saying this never happened, and was in a Hollywood Studio...Actually, theres even an episode on Mythbusters where they prove everything saying it didnt happen, wrong. People just enjoy controversy.
Simstein77 2 years ago
I don't believe it happened..
enios3 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Question? If we just all saw Neil Armstrong step foot on the moon for the first time, then who was holding the camera?
dandres2001 2 years ago
Why would you need a man holding a camera for the camera to work?
The camera was attached to the door of the storage compartment, which Armstrong opened before descending the ladder. This is a pretty well-known fact.
tehbertl 2 years ago
stanley kubrick
MobTownHooligan 2 years ago
lol i bet wen they wer up ther they felt like sayin . OW YEAHHH TAKE THAT RUSIA
Rigman20 2 years ago
Yes and I bet that was the thought nixon had just over forty years ago when he was so obsessed with getting there before russia he made it look suspicous
Condemnedxbox 2 years ago
This is an amazing video man
vjhadid 2 years ago 2
This is an amazing video man
vjhadid 2 years ago 2
ur mum is a whore
tom2197 2 years ago
How can you not think that everyother space mission is fake if you think that this one is. What's your theory behind the space station?
Carl2264 2 years ago
armstrong did fly to the moon but did not land on first one as the 3 rd one was real one actually.
symmetry08 2 years ago
ITS TECHNOLOGICALLY IMPOSSIBLE
monksquare 2 years ago
your dumb. if the world worked together we would already have a moon base, and would be on mars. but we put the stupid selfish people in charge. instead of putting scientists and the educated in charge of our countries.
Way to fall for Obamas Advertising Campain america, the shiny object getting wagged in front of ur faces wins again.
lol makes me sad....
Colin13ify 2 years ago
I remember seeing this when I was only a little girl and my heart still skips a beat! Amazing!
ragonswife 2 years ago
Comment removed
shengcheng12345 2 years ago
Here is one fact that is indisputable.
The moon rocks they brought back to earth. Scientists and geologists from around the world have seen them. The samples are very different from anything on earth.
deportes3 2 years ago 2
O course. How could America pull this off, without covering their tracks?
Look I like the thought of what they did, I just don't believe they actually went to the moom.
PierresBlog 2 years ago
Comment removed
Colin13ify 2 years ago
I agree with you. I don't think anybody has honestly.
Poncho4NCVox 2 years ago
I think people forget that the first time anything is accomplished it is always a little rough around the edges. It was truly an amazing accomplishment considering the technology that we had at the time.
greekgoddess59 2 years ago
tthis was real. my father was a guy working at launch control. he hooked up a camera to show me some of te flight. it was looking straight out the window. of course he asked the astronauts first :) but it shows em landing and walking out.
crazy89mex 2 years ago 2
All of the points that the conspiracy theorists have brought up have been dismissed one by one comprehensively by facts. And yet they continue. Still, when did facts ever get in way of Americans believing in some very silly things?
SeaTacAthiest 2 years ago
where are the stars
viperpulse 2 years ago
Starlight needs a long exposure to show up. The film they were using wasn't that sensitive. Also we see stars on earth because the light is magnified through our atmoshere. Out in space it's black
Metalmiltia 2 years ago
yea,ur right
ssali16 2 years ago
look above u
ssali16 2 years ago
No stars in pics or footage? Simple:
The Moon's albedo (ability to reflect sunlight) is very high and with no atmosphere to traverse, daylight at the surface is much brighter than on Earth, outshining all dimer light sources (stars) similar to what light pollution does in big cities on Earth (which is why many if not all ground based telescopes are in the wilderness).
18CaStRaDoMiS89 2 years ago 2
I dont really care if this was real or not but why can the material of the flag survive in such conditions? just wondering, was it specialy designed for space?
004Daniel 2 years ago
The flag is made out of some sort of metal, I forget which
boots652001 2 years ago
The man that delivered my child was a part of the team. He he is one of the most wonderful, honest and intelligent people I'll ever have the honor of knowing. I don't think he would have all the awards and mission patches on display in his office just to keep a lie going for 40 years. He's proud of them and has every right to be. He is a true Scientist and a commendable man.
MrsLecter666 2 years ago
The hoax is bull shit MY DOG IS SMARTER THEN YOU!!!
KetchPhraz 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fake and sad that dimwit government-worshippers and authority-driven lemmings cannot see that fact. These Astro-Nots should be ashamed of their bullshit and lies. Truth is first ridiculed, then violently opposed, then accepted.
We are between stage 1 and 2 now. Eventually the sheeple will get to stage 3. Then Neil and his other 33-degree Mason buddies can be remembered for what they were - liars and scumbags.
Noisycowonline 2 years ago
BIN LADEN
birolha 2 years ago
please check out and comment this video its called ianleanz type in that best video my friend showed me it
phins9 2 years ago
wat a moment for mankind
Powerstation88 2 years ago
Go to school man.
Janskleig 2 years ago 2
It's sad that people can smoke so much crack that they're totally messed up in their little brains so that they can't realize the truth and all the evidence that IT WASN'T A HOAX!!!!!!
All you paranoid conspiracyfuckers can go to hell!
It's useless to try and discuss it with you inbred morons!
UberWaiss 2 years ago 3
fully agree with you mate *thumbs up*
ukTRBuk 2 years ago
Trouble is with these douchebags is that they were fucking stupid before they ever started taking drugs. It's a lethal combination.!
Metalmiltia 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
GOD BLESS AMERICA AND NO PLACE ELSE
andy11215 2 years ago
GOD DOESN'T EXIST AMERICA IS FUCKED
SoFrosts 2 years ago
Ok, you freaky conspiracy theorists. Let me ask you something. Why do you think the Soviet scientists stayed silent on the Apollo Moon landing?
If a couple of undersexed American shills could figure out that it was a hoax, then I am sure the brightest minds of the Soviet Union could as well. And if they did, they had the best weapon to blow the US out of the water - but they didn't. So what gives?
You lot are idiots.
1tephania 2 years ago
Doubting something unconditionally is not the hallmark of intelligence. For a suspicion to be a sign of intelligence, it must first be backed up by unmovable and legitimate reasons.
At any rate, you are only doubting the Apollo Moon landing because half-assed documentaries with spooky music told you so. Who's the sheeple now?
1tephania 2 years ago
I am a Conspiracy Factualist. And, the fact with Sioviet Suilence is that shortly after Lunar Landing we helped the CCCP build up there space program. Anyone thinking Russia was our enemy is smoking too much crack.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
Well that makes no sence cause if the Russian space program knew we faked it they would state it 100% Russias space program was the proudest thing the country got. Nothing was more important to them! And by the way we got reflectors on the moon to prove we have been there aswell as satelite photos of man made eqipment... SO is this really an issue?
Hatchatfatbat 1 year ago
No they would not. If not for us Russia would never have made a Space Shuttle. And, reflectors on the moon. We have satellites on the moon. Can easily put reflectors on a satellite and have it land there. Russia has more satellites on the moon than the US.
Why do you think we cannot go to the moon now? Like really if we truly landed on the moon we just improve and duplicate it. You do not lose that type of technology.
We did not have the shielding to go through Van Allen Belt.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
Omg not that bullshit again... YES we have been to the moon YES the van allen belt is radioctive but not enough to kill you inside a space shuttle! And OMG of coarse we could go to the moon again! But we have done it many times that race is ower!!! Its Mars we try to get to now!
Hatchatfatbat 1 year ago
Nope plans are to moon not Mars. Go to Nasa and it is to MOON!!! Yiou are a dumb fuck!!!! Proving you are a Fucktard!!!!
Which proves lunar landing is a hoax since you are a brainless dumb ass.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
One plan YES! A moonbase.... Sigh you conspiracy people are nuts! Think you know better than the rest of the freaking WORLD!
Hatchatfatbat 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 Russia would have cried out LOUD if USA faked it, because they to tried very hard to be there first, but failed. They had all means of discovering a fake immediately. We could go to the Moon again in less than 10 years with the same, or improved technology, if somebody was willing to put up the billions it would cost. Nobody is. The taxpayers (and politicians) consider it "not important enough".
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES Correct. But, to keep in silence look at after fact we helped Russia progress more into space. If we could go to the moon we would have started colonized 30 years ago. We had the money and resources and we did not. Why? Lunar landing was fake.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 USA "helped" Russia after USSR collapsedn by letting them in on the ISS. Up until Apollo USSR was leading the spacerace. And, why colonising the Moon? It would cost hundreds of billions. What's to gain? Even if there were diamonds all over the surface, it would be too expensive to bring them back to Earth. Apollo was prematurely "put to sleep" because the interest faded after the race was won, and the majority of the public considered moontrips a waste of money.
YDDES 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 Why fake a moon-landing in the first place? President Kennedy asked his science advisors what USA could do to beat USSR. He asked if they for example could build a spacestation or land a man on the Moon. The experts said: Land on the Moon. If they thought it impossible, why not use the same money and technology to build a spacestation? It would have been insane to waste so much money on a fake, since even the military could have used a station for many purposes.
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES @YDDES You ever heard of Operation Paperclip. Both sides Russia and US had Nazis in the space race building better rockets. Modern day Nazi Propaganda which is still practiced today by the Nazi Fourth Reich. Both Russia and US had Hitler's Propagandists during Space Race. So it was one huge Propaganda Machine to fuel hatred to both countries. That is your smoking gun Space Race was a Hoax of the Propaganda Machine you are victim to.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 That last remark of Yours makes no sense at all regarding the space exploration and lunar landings. And, for Your education: The Germans employed by USA and USSR after the war were rocket scientists building the V2's, not Goebbels propagadists. Yor talk is just adesperate try to avoid questions about facts regarding the lunar landings. And, there still was no reason to spend that money on a fake, when a spacestation could have been built instead.
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES Who do you think put fluoride in our water supply? Propagandists from Nazi Germany. Nazis still are in all branches of Russian and US Government. Nazis never died they like pumping us with propaganda. Like the Lunar Landing to turn a blind eye to Vietnam. When Vietnam ended the Lunar Landings ended. It was to keep from worrying about Vietnam.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 Do You even know what "Nazi" means? You are living in a fantasy. Try to read some history. But not on Youtube, but in a library...
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES My family Bush Family which all of us are indoctrinated in the thinking of a Global Nationalization of a One World Government and Religion. My cousin Obama was also indoctrinated. Read Operation Paperclip. So YOU go to a library and you will truly find it is an idealogy of a Gloablized Nationalization of a One World Government and Religion that was why everyone in Europe was assimilated or exterminated and why it is going on today.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 And that's why all the scientists, and all the aerospace companies in the USA (with the help of the rest of the world) decided to fool You about some lunar landings? Give me a break......
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES The biggest propaganda machine is the TV. People sit in day in, day out, night after night feeding you whatever bullshit they want to feed you. So YOU are the fool. Why the hell do you think it ended at the end of the Vietnam War? People would start questioning if it was real since people did not worry if they were going to be drafted. NASA should have never archived the lunar landings. Then people would not start questioning since they are no longer stressed out due to the war.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 In real life, it ended because the politicians discovered that the public lost interest in lunar landings after the USSR had been beaten to the Moon, and cut the fundings. NASA had planned to go on with small habitats, bigger rovers and even small "Lunar flyers". Those were already on the drawing boards. Why spend money on that planning if it wasn't real? And, I still ask You: WHY spend so much money on a hoax, instead of a spacestation? It's YOU who has been fooled...
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES We had a space station, back in '74 that was a waste of money. Since it was never hardly used. Skylab. And, it cost the government a lot less to hoax a lunar landing then going through emotional anguish of losing a loved one in Vietnam. Kept many disabled soldiers watching the lunar landings than protesting the Vietnam War. So it benefited the government. Since the 2 lunar craters which were filmed are here on this planet at a closed down Area 51.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 "Skylab never hardly used"? 2.000 hours of scientific work was logged, and hundreds of thousands pictures and films taken of, among other objects, the Sun and the Earth. It was too small to do experiments now possible on the ISS. The military wanted, and planned, small spacestations (the MOL for example), but their fundings were cut. To fund a hoax, easily detected? I don't think any grieving relatives were consulated by a moon-trip. But USSR was beaten in the race.
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES Wrong Russia beat us in every aspect. And, the reason why they stopped their cosmonauts were being killed. The problem was they did not have a manufacturing plant and assembly on same spot. They needed to disassemble and rebuild and rockets went BOOM!!! You should always have as few booster rockets as possible, Russia had 30. 1 failed it would blow It did advance our technology.
The only astronauts which looks like they went through the Van Allen Belt is those of Apollo 13.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 Yes, up till Apollo USSR beat USA. They didn't "stop" anything. Soyus was delayed by two fatal accidents. But it went on. Even USA had factories for the rockets and spaceships spread among several companies over the nation. So, what?. I know the N-1 failed because of too- many engines in the first stage. But anyhow: They really TRIED to fly to the Moon, just as USA did. So You believe that Apollo 13 went out behind the belts, but no other Apollos? Why?
+
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES The eyes. You need to face them face to face. The whole Apollo 13 astronauts looks like they had huge doses of radiation. While the rest of the Apollo Astronauts look like they stayed aboard skylab or orbited the Earth. I hate when people say Apollo 13 was fake when they are the only ones which went through the Van Allen Belt.
With today's technology we can build radiation proof ships to go through Van Allen.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 All right, You aren't serious. Just talking rubbish. Because Skylab didn't exist during the lunar flights. I'm not interested in this stupid "conversation" anymore. Hope You get well.
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES I screwed up I talked to fast. I wasn't born when the landings happened. I was born the year after Skylab went up. I thought last lunar landing was 1975. But, thank GOD I live next to NASA and corrected me as 1972. And, Skylab was after. So it is easy to confuse if you were not even born. And, lived in the time period. So it is easy to get dates and years screwed up.
But, fact is skin and eyes of Apollo 13 astronauts looks like they had high dosages of radiation.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 All right, I can answer You on this one. Not interested in telling too much about myself on the Net, the datas regarding my person here on You tube are not always the absolute truth. Actually, I WAS born then, and followed the whole Apollo project extensively from the start to the end. I have A LOT of printed material from those days, both from newspapers and scientific publications from several countries. That's why I know man went to the Moon.
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES You do not happen to have had a HAM radio back then. I need a smoking gun lunar landing took place. I need someone with a HAM which heard the lunar landing. I have been looking for someone which heard it on a HAM radio.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 No, but since I've worked with the public radio in Sweden, I know that Swedish radioastronomers followed the Apollos from "Råöobservatoriet".
To the Moon. And back...
YDDES 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 What makes You competent to determine if someone have had a high dose of radiation, by looking at his eyes on a photo??? No, You can't be serious.
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES Pupil dilation, Same way someone has done drugs. I can tell the exact drug someone is on. Been an EMT work for 16 years.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@YDDES And, not on a photo I met every astronaut in the space program. Only Apollo 13 astronauts have the abnormal pupil dilation.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 "All the astronauts in the space program"... When and wher did You meet them? You was born after Skylab, You say...
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES All those still living from 1995 to present. I have met a good majority. And, the eyes which tell all was a Shipmate Captain Lovell. His eyes told all.
The only one who I did not meet was Fred Haise. And, Swigert died in 1982. I was born in '74 and saw Swigert when I was 6 years old. I wish I was 14 years older back in 1980 when I met him. I would have looked at his pupils.
Watch Buzz's eyes when he speaks. They twitch and roll. He is being creative,.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 Oh, so all the scientists all over the world has been fooled for 40 years, but You see the truth in the pupils of a person? Forgive me for not being convinced...
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES If you see peoples eyes roll up to the right they are using creative side of brain. They are lying. And, yes that is how many police tell if someone is lying. They roll their eyes and not directly in their eyes.
Take Bush Jr a classic case of habitual lying. Another thing to look for is licking the lips. Licking oif lips means you are grasping for words to tell a lie. Learn police interrogation and it is all things we look for.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@YDDES You wnat the smoking gun Lunar Landing was fake. There are 2 craters at Area 51. Not once do you see the astronauts face in the space helmet. So everyone was faked.
Every Astronaut just orbited Earth except for Apollo 13 which something happened. Because happens they were close to a crater filled with water. And, none of the lunar landings brought back water.
It is called the select few can fool the many. All it took was 10-20 people to fool the thousands on the project.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 10-20 people to calculate and send a Saturn V on a trajectory around the Earth, instead of to the Moon? 10-20 people to align the antennasall over the world to... where??? An orbiting satellite instead of the Moon??? What You say here makes no sense at all. Nor does Your talk about "rolling eyes" and "licking lips". I suspect You are trying to make a fool of Your self for some reason...
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES With the astronauts inside. Astronauts had to be inside so they can script read. Then the people filming will know. The people in the space suits at Area 51. Every NASA employee could be fooled. Majority of personnel is within Area 51 so will not know what is going on. And, film. When done a perfect DisNASAy film. They should have screamed Holy fucking shit we fuckin made it to the moon fuck you Commie Bastards. Instead of the low monotone voice one small step for man.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 You forget one thing: These men were all the top of the top military test pilots. Very proud of their profession. They almost never screamed "horray" or boasted about their accomplishments. That would have looked bad in front of their colleagues. Cool and calm in the face of imminent death risk. Also: If one knows that what one is about to say will be historical, one think it over a little, I think. And what about the radio transmissions from the way to, and on the Moon?
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES We always prevailed at the enemy. There was no prevail. Military would have always smeared a Commie Red in the face if given a chance. I think Walt Disney wrote the script it sounds like the perfect "Disney Image".
The radio transmissions is the "smoking gun" since they need to be on an exact frequency of the Apollo Missions. If they were not on the exact frequency all they would hear is static.
Live feed went to Australia then to US the real reason of delay.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 The radio frequencies were no secrets. No problems there. Australia was used as the recieving point only when the Moon was at that side of the Earth, and couldn,t be reached directly from USA. You are wrong about those "first words". Actually, Armstrong was chosen to step out first, because he was formally a CIVILIAN (but had been testing military aircraf before being an astronaut). Also, the plaque left on the Moon said: "for the whole world".
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES Read up on the frequencies used. No HAM could have picked it up not even Russia. They had the wrong frequency.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 All frequencies used by non military spacecraft, both American and Russian, were made public by an international agreement. I don't have the Apollos frequencies available in front of me, but I happen to have some others in an older publication: Sputnik 1: 20.002 mc and 40.005 mc, Explorer 1: 108.00 and 108,03 mc, Ranger 1: 960.1 and 960.05 mc for example. Anyone could listen in on the Apollos just as any other non-military spacecraft. You are just guessing that no one could...
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES Apollo 11 had radio frequencies between 2000-2300 MhZ. There should have been lots and lots of radio chatter in those frequencies and not just the lunar lander. What they should have done wa shave the Lunar Roover do a continuous playback which could still be heard today for each lunar landing. You also had the uplink antenna on a different frequency. So with each one had the whole 2000 GhZ -3000 GhZ on a continuous loop. So each one can be verified to this very day.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 Phew! The lunar landings had two purposes: Beat the USSR and scientific researche. To put a radio transmitter on the Moon just to try to convince ignorant people decades later would be a waste. Of critical payload weight and of limited radio frequencies. And, not the LEM, nor the Rover had any solar cells to feed a transmitter for a longer time. The equipment left behind included a transmitter fed by a radioactive isoptope, but it wasn't designed to to send for decades.
YDDES 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 You seem to search for new "anomalies" all the time, when those You present are refuted. I advice You to take a deep breath and dive into the VAST pile of REAL information about the lunar landings that actually exist. Can You present just ONE "smoking gun" that really proves that the whole Apollo program was a fake?
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES Mop HAM'S picked it up. My Uncle HAM Operator never recieved to busy attached to TV.. The Propaganda News Reporters should have told all HAM Operators get off the TV and listen to frequency 2275.5 MgZ The HAM Radio is the Smoking Gun. Next Smoking Gun is the craters at Area 51. A closed defunct base empty yet still the most highly guarded base. Due to craters you can see from satellite photos. Those were the craters used.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 So all the lunar landing photos and films were produced outdoors at night with only ONE bright lightsource high up in the sky? No wind at all to move the flags or stir up the dust... Whoops! Well, if Your uncle didn't listen, many others around the world did. Including the Rusians. They even had "fishing trawlers" packed with antennas in the ocean outside Cape Kennedy. At all times. "Smoking gun". Yeah, right...
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES People who had HAMs only watched TV. I have not met one person for over 15 years who heard it on a personal HAM radio. I sometimes still pick up broadcasts from Voyager.
The shadows from the Moon. MJajority of the camera equipment should have been destroyed by sun exposure. All you have is direct sunlight on the moon. NASA cameras have picked up stars. On the Moon there are none and with no atmosphere there should be infinite stars shown.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 Why should the sunlight have destroyed the cameras? Explain, please. Because the sunlight didn't destroy the cameras on the Geminis or on the ISS. No NASA cameras have picked up stars on the same pictures as properly exposed brightly sunlit objects. Anyone who knows even just a little about basic photography understands that. To photograph stars without any planet, spaceship or other object in sight is of course easy, if You hold the camera still during the long exposure.
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES How sunlight destroys all cameras. Direct pointing at the sun. They still remind people do not point the camera at the sun. Also even with the best shades on they would have been blinded by the sun several times over. Surprised none of them fell from the sun being bombarded at them.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 The astronauts didn't point the cameras at the sun. They photographed the Moons surface. And sunlight doesn't destroy cameras using film, only electronic ones (TV and digital). All stills from the Moon were caught on film.
Now, what about the stars? Do You still state that there should be stars in the sky above the brightly illuminated surface?
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES Actually 1 camera was destroyed by sunlight. Research it.
What will beat the Conspiracy is a Lunar Landing in 5-10 years. It will shut every conspiracy theorist up. A Lunar Landing now has zero possibilty it could be a hoax in today's age.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 That was not a Hasselblad (the still camera with film). Ahum... the stars?...
A lunar landing now could be faked just as little as then, because of, among other obvious things, the possibility of tracking every single spacecraft all the way to the Moon and back.
Actually, there's NOTHING substantial pointing to a hoax. It was all started by a few smart persons making things up to sell their books and videos to gullible people.
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES Those books have more facts backed up than NASA can ever dream. If the Lunar Landing was not a hoax why can't they do a lunar landing now. NASA claims they lost the technology to land again. How can you lose technology when NASA "Keeps Advancing" So Lunar Landing was a Hoax. They should repeat what they did some 40 years ago. This was the biggest Conspiracy as JFK.
They should just say let's prove the conspirators wrong and launch a new lunar landing. Then no one can debunk.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 Would You spend billions just to make ignorant people shut up? It's no use to use 60's technology to go to the Moon again, and NASA hasn't got that money now. Who should pay? If Obama hadn't killed the Orion-program, USA had gone back when vew spacecraft had been built.
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES Obama killed it when he read the classified reports we never landed on the moon. And, if the new astronauts do not see the things left behind are not there people will riot.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@YDDES They should take pictures with HUBBLE those could do close ups of the Lunar Lander. They want to feed the Conspiracy Theorists. Instead of debunking.
I think it is time for NASA to prove they did a Lunar Landing by Landing on the Moon in the next 5-10 years. I want to see NASA land on the moon in this time period. That way they can prove to all of us they can land on the moon and shut everyone up.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 If You just take the trouble to get some facts abot the Hubble telescope, You'll find out why it can't take any high resolution pictures of the equipment left behind on the Moon (it doesn't magnify as much as You might think, and the most sensitive camera demands a too long exposure-time to photograph a fast moving object like the Moon).
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES The Moon is not a fast moving object. The whole universe is a fast moving object. The moon does not revolve like the Earth does. That is why you see the Man on the Moon in every country. And, HUBBLE does move around quite frequently. Have you ever seen HUBBLE Earth pictures. Think, Department of Defense helped with the project. What is NRO, NASA, and Department of Defense hiding which is classified?
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 Compared to the distant galaxies, and even the planets in our Solar system, the Moon moves fast, seen from Hubble, because it's so close. No, I can't say I've seen Earth pictures taken by Hubble. Where can I find them? Why would the DoD use Hubble, when their spy satellites, which can even change their orbits, can photograph cars and people on the ground?
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES That is the best question why would HUBBLE be used. According to Corning Glass. They use HUBBLE when there are NO satellites in the vicinity. Our satellites along with Russia cover close to 75% of the planet. HUBBLE is actually hardly used except in emergency scenerios. It does not have full capability like our spy satellites. It is just one huge still photography camera
Go to Corning Glass. They are the creators of the lense and will tell more than NASA.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@YDDES You and me are smart. But, it does not take a rocket scientist to know that why does not one satellite ever take a close up photo of the abandoned Apollo Mission still on the moon. They can take a picture of a license plate from space and clearly read the letters. Yet they cannot take one picture of the lunar landing remains.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 Phew! The spy satellites orbit Earth, not Moon! Of course they can't photograph small objects over there. There's no scientific reason to send a very expensive "spy camera" to orbit the Moon. Who would pay for that? The satellites photographing it are just for mapping; that is photographing large areas, not small objects like boulders (and LEM's). After all, the satellites ARE photographing the landing areas, and there are many pictures of the LEM's. What more do You ask for?
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES Cost would be less than 10 million. Chunk change for the Federal Government. And, not me look at how many milions of people think the Lunar Landing is a Hoax.
TheStormchaser1 1 year ago
@TheStormchaser1 10 millions is much for NASA. The sum can be better used. For scientific research for example. If "the government" should be spending a lot of money any time some uneducated people doubt something, where should that lead? Let them doubt and be ignorant about anything they want. Why should the government or NASA care? And why should the taxpayers money be spent for it?
YDDES 1 year ago