You realise that the americans didn't really "win" the war of independance. The British left because of the French and because the USA wasn't a cost effective colony :p
The same thing would have happened with the USA as with every other country in the empire we would have granted the US independence, because we are not arseholes,.
I think it would of turned out so much better for both of us if america was in the common wealth instead of being the "rebellious child" all them years ago. we could of done much better for both our countries Britain could be the wise restrained brains america the powerful brawn i bet both our countries would be so much better off. But we will never know
We let you guys win, we had a bigger navy, more soldiers and more money , better weaponry. But if the British People wernt so kind you would still be apart of our empire.
@Flamesofthunder wrong we would fight on for ever we had a goal and wanted freedom the worlds largest army can never fight that we would simply over time chisel down your army to nothing and im sure you didnt just let us win after you lost America it was all downhill for the British there huge navy was mostly made in New England and the resources Britain lost after the war is the reason they lost again to America in 1812
The reason why there was never a proper invasion is that the jewels of the British was India and public support was not in favor of a war. Britain is a country where we go to war with the public backing us. And Yes you would probably fight to your last man, but that would degrade into a Resistance rather than a war. Furthermore Britain is a navel power, the British aim to blockade. Sure we didnt let you win but we knew if we invaded the public would dislike it
@Flamesofthunder so without your empire you would have been crushes btw you cant blockade a country when its self sufficent they werent even recieving supplies from the Atlantic also the Germans if not stoped in Italy by the US and halted because of D day would have new U boats capable of making Britains Navy look like rubber ducks and reguardless if Germany was defeated the same thing would happen just with a soviet flag they would eventualy get there hands on German Naval and Airforce tech
We are talking about the civil war not the World wars German Technology has always been on the forefront, they devolved missiles and jet plane helicopters and much before any other nation. However the might of the British Lies within in our will we possess(which we currently lost)The main reasons we lost the war is more people saw it as more beneficial if the US was interdependent If we did go all out we would probably have a war on 3 fronts
@MetalicaFan2007 Wait a minute, did you really just say Britain LOST to America in 1812?!?!?!?! You call being easily repulsed from Canada and having your capital city + whitehouse being burned WINNING?????? Britain and Canada won the war of 1812 after you unprovkingly attacked their territories......
@TalonMercenary we beat you on the Great lakes then again at new orleans you took washington because we evacuated it because our army was not big enough to hold it
and we didnt unprovokingly attack your territories ever here of impressment? thats as well as paying the Indians to attack westward settlements. Britain was fighting a war with America through third parties long before 1812
@TalonMercenary and reguardless with France and spain breathing down your back an all out war with the US would have simply made Britain weaker Andrew jacksons small army held off new orleans against a majority of the british navy and won
then on the great lakes the british navy lost to the US navy which ment we controlled the great lakes DC was a fluke you landed there and burned it because thats european stlye warfare. however we would just keep moving the cap untill we won
@iiShaanop not realy you had the advantages on all fronts but still lost taking over an unguarded city and burning it for no reason was stupid not a fluke i rephrase my answer
@Flamesofthunder this has been shown time and time again and to be truthful if the British didnt treat the US like there personal Piggy bank Prision and Resource hub we probably would have no problem staying with Britiain the First continental congress made that very clear then king george in laymens terms told us to kiss his ass and we did if by kiss you mean kick and ass you mean nuts
@zell2929 If you had lost the war, you'd likely have gained independance anyway. Personally, I wonder what the modern world would have been like if the American colonies had gained parliamentary representation as they demanded.
I know this is all made up and a fantasy exercise but... it would be funnier or friendlier for the rest of us if you didn't unify Germany with England in all your videos... Specially being a very weird/awkward/impossible thing to happen.
Also, don't unify the "double monarchies" like nothing lol, that NEVER happened in history (as in 2 empires unify all of a sudden").
To finish, WHY does the Earth Empire have the English flag as the main flag? It should be a new flag for everyone...
Why are people getting so irritated by this, it is not real and we all know it. I am British and I know that the USA are an ally, and any American reading this know that we are their allies.
If it was so much better, then i ask you people, why did BRITISH citizens, leave their own country? If all was good and well?
Dumbasses, the British Empire during it's time served the position America does now, and not a single country gave it respect, it went through countless recessions, increases in taxes, global warfare, mass genocide, the killing of it's own people and numerous revolutions in it's distant ocupations.
i'm not saying America's the better, but neither is Britian.
Britain was better than America, not perfect but better.
I mean, come on America didn't abolish slavery for another 60 years.
The 13 colonies (everyone who WASN'T Washington or his army) did not want to be American, they wanted to remain under the Crown, and nonetheless George had to abandon his colony to fight France, so the 13 colonies were forced to become American.
@RyanBrooksby Yes Britian abolished slavery after 1,000 years. America did after 60, it's a young country.
Besides is slavery your only point?
America didn't kill it's own people, it didn't condemn the poor and in-debt to work homes and death. Get over yourself, and study your history, Britian isn't very noble.
Yes, because Medieval Warlords would really abolish Slavery.
It wasn't how they thought back then, and even so, no they didn't, because Slavery earned...no money in Medieval times. In Medieval times it was more exploiting Plebeians/Commoners, than actual Slaves.
I'm remarking how everybody else in the world had Democratic rights, whereas America FORCED it's own colonies to become American.
Well I mean, the 13 colonies were forced to become part of USA.
@RyanBrooksby They weren't though. If you knew American history, the delegates from each colony took a poll in their home state and a majority of people in each state voted to become a whole nation. Besides after Britian rummucked through the New England and southern colonies by pilliaging and burning they lost all popular support with the crown.
So no, it was optional. Also? If the "FOUNDER" of America is going to be better, why aren't we flying British flags over our buildings?
Oh my god, were do you get your information? This is bullshit, all of it.
The 13 colonies NEVER wanted to be American. They wanted to be BRITISH. Because after George had to abandon them, they unwillingly had to become British. It caused a lot of arguments in Washington D.C.
I bet you don't even know what Defence Scheme No.1 is nor why Britain never used it.
@RyanBrooksby LOL! You have got to be making stuff up now. Because what i'm saying is bullshit? Yeah OKAY, i'm going to assume this your little way of making yourself feel better, okay?
Well since you didn't even provide proof, then you're chatting bullshit.
Come on, the 13 colonies went there, UNDER THE CROWN.
Wasington just wanted power. I mean, look at America, they wanted to annex Canada and if they had any land near it, I knew they'd try and annex Australia and New Zealand too.
America despises sovereign countries, especially those under the crown.
But, I'm not patriotic. Nope. I hate all Governments on Earth, so don't assume I'm
Some nationalist idiot. I KNOW the difference between USA/Britain.
And given that America fails to be a democracy (it's a Republic) whilst Britain is...well, a Democracy, then we can automatically realize Britain is better.
People can't vote in Republics for things. Yes, elections, but who voted for Vietnam? Libya? No one. America just did another Leeroy Jenkins entry into wars.
The worst mistake the US ever made was seceding from Britain. And now the US has blighted the world with an economic crisis and hatred all around. I can't wait to get to the UK, and get out of this blasted country.
why do the americans not get it. The Americans were British and the British were British so what do you get. Answear British fighting British.civil war. remember you had another. So what you are saying is that the southern states were a differant nation. 85% of the Us poulation went to the USA in the 1800's.
People in London paid the most taxes, and they could afford to pay them.
Taxes played no part in the USA splitting off, they didn't want to be ruled from London. However 1/3 of America did not want USA independance, they wanted the Crown, but the USA forced Britain to leave using the French as allies (so they did no work in the war, losing every battle and making France do their dirty work) and so the 13 colonies were FORCED to become American.
@mrmattusftw for the soviets nazis and imperial china or most likely the British empire which were just as bad would still be around since we were the colony that realy got Britain kicking
@mrmattusftw Pfft, Britain would just displace the various roles that the US have played during the 20th\21st century, same people control both the nations.
@warpunk1 I firmly believe that if the American War of Independence was won by Great Britain, neither world wars would have ever occured. Afterall, Germany under the Kaiser, had been childishly competing with the British Royal Navy in ship production since the turn of the century, and had secretely built up for massed industrial warfare since 1909 - all to get one up over the British, in the Germans great envy. Had Britain been twice the power it was by the in actual history...NONE WOULD DARE :]
@warpunk1 It cannot be denied that the World Wars took the wind out of Britains once proud sails...it managed to get over WWI after colossal damages - like everyone else had suffered of course - but ran straight into the Wall Street Crash etc. Just after picking up territories in the Middle East and such places from the crushed Ottoman Empire etc. This would lead to a destabilisation that would become untennable after the titanic events of WW2...which finally knocked the British Empire O.O.A
I think we all know that had the Revolutionary War gone to the British, it would have resulted in the eventual formation of the Empire of Britannia. And wars would be fought with mecha on wheels.
The Revolution was COMPLETELY unnecessary and was fought to protect corrupt smugglers who were going to be hurt by tarrifs that were going to ensure a better quality product for the people.
@BorsBaledwyr With such a huge, world-changing entity (like the changes or not), the effects of a lost Revolutionary War in the 13 colonies would have such far-reaching and pervasive effects that frankly it would be difficult to determine them all, much less the world that would result over 200 years later.
You could be right, but don't be so very certain in your wording.
@456Beethoven History proves there's always going to someone somewhere that's a "big headed bastard" in the world. Were it not the US, it would be somewhere else. Maybe it would have been the English instead.
Hehe ou americans are fools....we wanted this to happen!, we knew if we became thebigest empire we would be hated, so we honerably "lost" to you chaps who have taken over and become our greatest ally, and when you all fail, and most of the world rebaels against the superpower...ENGLAND WILL RISE AND RECLAIM WHAT IS RIGHTFULLY OURS.... no one sees it coming :p
@Shineypillz Hell I could care less I like England. Although eventually every superpower abuses it power regardless. The problem is governments not the people. Patriotism & nationalism are plagues. People don't like this because their pride gets in the way. We are a very individualism country unfortunately and don't take others views as important as we should. All people deserve to have a say but so is history.
@gab10hp Only if you want the Nazis controlling Europe and the Japanese Empire stretching the whole East Asia-Pacific Region. Causing the Soviet Union to get its dignity back and endless war between Nazi Europe and the Soviet Union in East Europe. Without America the Soviet Union wouldn't of fell because of them losing the Afghanistan War.
@gab10hp Every Nation has had its independence since the Statue of Westminister 1936 and the British Empire was gone in 1997 with the hand over of Hong Kong, But the Queen still reigns over UK, Australia, Canada and NZ and 16 Commonwealth Realms.
@owen82100 Who's to say the Soviet Union would have even existed? If Britain held what is now the US the resources and man power gains would have given them enough to rule over greater swathes of territory, or at the very least given them far more economical power than they had (which at it's height was supreme). Remember, the Empire was carried on the back of commerce as much as military might. Many would argue more so.
Well now, that's just silly. Just a point - there are easier ways to make military alliances than to unite the royal families of two separate countries. Plus, if you have tension building up between alliances, the way that doesn't ever end is those two alliances joining together to beat on the rest of the world. If there were tendencies that leaned that way in the first place, the world would have been dominated by the Macengolian empire for the last 2,000 years.
You might want to read the book, "For Want of a Nail" which is an alternate history on this subject. As for the Royal houses of Europe splitting the way you suggest, I remind you that George III was a Hanover, the same as many of the rulers of the German states as well as related to the Swedish King. His mother was a Saxe-Gotha, also royalty in Europe. He was concurrently ruler of the UK and prince-elector of Brunswick-Lüneburg. I doubt very much things would have gone as you suggest.
@jonpetry The current royal family is Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, and they renamed themselves as 'Windsor' during the 20th century to distance themselves from Germany and solidify their British identity. There were plenty of opportunities for England to rise with Germany in both the First and Second World Wars, but English culture easily won out over the Central European ties of the Royal family.
With the wealth of the 13 colonies going to London, instead of New York, and with a more distant, and disinterested administration in London instead of Washington D.C, the 13 colonies would have grown much slower. London would reinvest money into England, wheras New York would reinvest money into the 13 colonies. Secondly, the issue of distance would make London less effcient in administrative, and financial investments for the 13 colonies. Lastly, people prosper with greater self determination.
@alternatehistorypt It really also is the Rhodesian. It is called "Rise, O, voices of Rhodesia / God,may we thy bounty share / give us strength to face all danger / and where challenge is to dare." Beethoven's Symphony No. 9, which is used by the EU as well.
CAPITALISM creates ELITE CRIMINALS. BANKERS. DRUG LORDS. INEQUALITY. INSECURITY. GREED. RUTHLESS COMMUNISM. NWO. NAZI. TERRORISM. LAZY PEOPLE. REBEL POLITICIAN. ANARCHY. worst is WAR etc.. etc..
CAPITALISM was designed only for CORRUPT OPPORTUNISTIC MANIPULATIVE LAZY POLITICIAN. BANKERS. LAWYERS. DRUG LORDS. JUDGES. CRIMINALS. DICTATORS. RULERS. KING. SULTANATE. EMPEROR etc. etc..
HARD WORKING PEACE LOVING HAPPY HONEST SOCIETY were always the slave victim and poorly starve to death. :(
@TheAshy14 Both the french and spanish were defeated in par with Britains resources alone, Had They had the manpower and resources of the US behind them .. .well
16. British Imperium military strength estimated at 19,000,000 units, with a Grand Surface Fleet total number of 3,600 ships. 17. Britain has a monopoly on the trade of the world and is unrivalled in technological advances. 18. South America is in turmoil in anticipation of the invasion of the British in earnest. 19. By 1960, British Imperium demolishes the last resistance in South America. 20. By 1975-2000, British Imperium controls the entire world. PAX BRITANNIA MAGNIFICENS-PANGAEA ULTIMA
Here is what would and would not happen; 1.The British capture all of the Northern American continent, perhaps taking another decade after the original end of the war to reach the western seaboard. 2.The spoils and long term income from these places funds massive expansion in the British military - which is also rewarded due to the achievements made. 3. South America is given greater interest, and all the coastal provinces on at least are captured within 60 years of the AWofI. Meanwhilst...
@ThePalaeontologist ...4. India is conquered. 5. French possessions in the Far East and Africa totally secured for Great Britain. 6. East India Trading company flourishes far greater than it ever really did, intentions on China and Mongolia are pressed and by year 1850 the majority of Indo-China is taken. 7. Africa is sought after, with competition with other European powers being light, as now the British are far too powerful to contend with. 8. As a side note, Napoleonic Wars never happen...
@ThePalaeontologist ....due to the threat of a superior might of the British contingent in mainland Europe if war ever broke out. Britain helps maintain the French monarchy - with France beaten in the AWofI too, they sue for peace and terms with Britain. British interests are to prevent rebellious revolutions or french invasions from Republic Army; they send soldiers to aid the weakened French Royalist army to defend the crown. Napoleon never becomes famous or more than a captain....
@ThePalaeontologist ...9.Indonesia and the Phillipines taken by 1870. 10. By 1875, the British Imperium has grown almost unsustainable; the land space occupied cannot be protected and held against enemies and any rebels. Aware of the fatal effect this had on the Roman Empire, the British government sanctions the instigation of radical changes to the Imperial army - a force of 2 Million soldiers soon defends the Empire, and the Royal Navy is increased by 60% in warship tonnage.....
@ThePalaeontologist 11.Russia declares alliance with Mongolia and the Baltic States around 1870's or 1880's as concerns grow amongst the mainland Europeans. British warships blockade Copenhagen and other ports of this new enemy. Within months, Prussia, Austria and Spain also declare war on Britain in joining this grand alliance. 12. Zulu defeated in Natal; Isandlwana never occurs. 13. Africa British territorial sector secured. 14. Rebellions in China and India. Suppressed.....
@ThePalaeontologist ...15. Franco-Prussian War of 1870 never happens; Royalist France owes its survival to Britain, and fights as its protectorate in the Britannic War Against the Alliance of Ruso-Baltica. Titanic land and naval battles drag on into the 20th Century. British power is tested but the warring allows the justification of constant growth of the armed forces. Eventually Sweden, Denmark and Mongolia cecede from the alliance in surrender. Russia bankrupts itself, leading to revolution.
@ThePalaeontologist ...Which forces her out of the war. Pruso-Austrian remnant army forces prove to be stubborn rivals to defeat easily, though after much bloodshed the British army curtails the rise of the Germanic states. Of course, by now around 1911, there has been no chance of Germany ever forming for 40 years already - BOTH WORLD WARS ARE OBVIOUSLY NEGATED. British triumph. Fall of Europe save for France assured. Spain was mainly inactive, yet fought on till 1920 until crushed...
The sign would be carried by jets, over the UK just as Russia fired ZERO-0, destroying the sign. Korea would create the death star and blow up the world. The end. oh and i notice that there have been some harsh comments towards Great Britain. We are allies are we not? if we were not here you wouldnt be either.
which had the capacity to blow up a england and prepare to get revenge on us. America would also want an act of revenge, from the slavery of the British Empire, and create a giant sign to show off their victory, this would be so big it was the size of the whole of the UK. the sign would say: You Stink!
@skipperacedude As much as this video is lame and does credit to no nation at all, your comments are more ridiculous still. The British freed the slaves in 1804, and prior to this, had in the American War of Independence, freed Black slaves of the colonies (many of which served in the army, not because of being forced, but due to lack of alternative employment) Your beloved USA was fighting its Civil War on the grounds of slavery over HALF A CENTURY later. Show some sense and see my point stands
Britain would loose USA, North Africa, Australia and Canada however we will keep controll of everything else. The chinese empire would also face huge revolts and former Russia would become, USSR. China would be wiped out and re-established as eutopia. USSR would use the industry of the early eutopian empire to create a death ray called ZERO-0,
china would then want an empire and invade Russia, Korea, Japan and New zealand. Britain would not interfere, (Breaking our treaty with russia.) and focus on a new indusrialised era. when queen Victoria takes the throne. England will become a povertised country however with the nececery equipment to start a conquest, this would turn out to be the great british empire. this would last about 87 years before independance should start to spring up around the world,
and we would take back europe and advance on russia, the war would stop when the British forces freeze in the Russian winter adn a treaty would be signed making England and Russia allies and allowing all the countries to regain their land. (in the war, only Britain would advance on Russia because europe would be weak.
wouldn't care if USA was controlled by UK because nothing really would have changed. Great Britain would then have had the chance to build a huge global empire, however we wont take it because we dont care about global domination or anything, (as history claims.) The russians should then realise how weak the rest of europe is and start a campain of domination. obviously this would drag us into war, (it's a habit.)
Here is my opnion on what would have happened globaly if we (Great Britain) won. firstly france would get all angry and attempt to invade the UK, HOWEVER, Britain would simply destroy their armada under the lead of admiral lord Horatio Nelson, (Was he around that time? we dont learn about the revolutionary war in history. please correct if i'm wrong.) i dont believe any other countries would intervine because Spain had a crippled armada and the rest of the world wouldn't care because
I hate these youtube videos where nothing happens, just music and a still frame picture.... BTW, what is the flag in the top left corner? Is it the 13 colonies or somthing????
A former French colony and France very tired by the WW2 lost the Indochina War in 1949 ALONE vs Communist from Indochine & China especially because The USA dont wanted to help France...
Vietnam War ?
When France fought allied with the USA in the Vietmam war ? LOL
The USA was alone and lost ALONE this war also
SO I CONFIRM : FRANCE & THE USA TOGETHER & ALLIED NEVER LOST A WAR :-)
@cumbas USA provided 80% of the war fund to France, as well as 300,000 pieces of equipment and small arms. It also gave Air and Naval support. All during the Indochina War. I don't call that "alone". It also ended in 1954. So herp derp to you sir.
For an America that loses the revolutionary war I see two major possibilities, America becomes part of the "commonwealth" not unlike canada or Australia where it maintains a loose amount of autonomy while being closely associated with Britain, or America's independence takes a back seat only to remerge later, such as in the civil war where Britain provided support to the Confederacy, Or, like India, America gains its independence after europe is broken by its world wars.
you guys do realize ur using the wrong song? I dont see y colonized N.America would have to ode to joy (that is used by the EU) for its anthem, epic fail
Not possible. if the American Colonies had lost the Revolutionary War then at the very least it would have gained it's independance sometime after the death of King George and the Reign of Queen Elizabeth II. What would the United States look like? well they may have been provinces like Canada... or seperate states like any other nation state. To many variables.
You realise that the americans didn't really "win" the war of independance. The British left because of the French and because the USA wasn't a cost effective colony :p
frumpable 5 days ago
Pax Britannia!
thomasburke87 6 days ago
If only -sigh-
hellom12345 1 week ago
Well then what country would be the worlds largest superpower? If not America like today, then which country would be? Very intriguing. :P
Sadryn 2 weeks ago
@Sadryn Probably China, that's my best guess at least.
Sadryn 2 weeks ago
The same thing would have happened with the USA as with every other country in the empire we would have granted the US independence, because we are not arseholes,.
England4eva89 2 weeks ago
I think it would of turned out so much better for both of us if america was in the common wealth instead of being the "rebellious child" all them years ago. we could of done much better for both our countries Britain could be the wise restrained brains america the powerful brawn i bet both our countries would be so much better off. But we will never know
SILVERCLOUD141 2 weeks ago
We let you guys win, we had a bigger navy, more soldiers and more money , better weaponry. But if the British People wernt so kind you would still be apart of our empire.
Flamesofthunder 2 weeks ago
@Flamesofthunder wrong we would fight on for ever we had a goal and wanted freedom the worlds largest army can never fight that we would simply over time chisel down your army to nothing and im sure you didnt just let us win after you lost America it was all downhill for the British there huge navy was mostly made in New England and the resources Britain lost after the war is the reason they lost again to America in 1812
MetalicaFan2007 2 weeks ago
@MetalicaFan2007
The reason why there was never a proper invasion is that the jewels of the British was India and public support was not in favor of a war. Britain is a country where we go to war with the public backing us. And Yes you would probably fight to your last man, but that would degrade into a Resistance rather than a war. Furthermore Britain is a navel power, the British aim to blockade. Sure we didnt let you win but we knew if we invaded the public would dislike it
Flamesofthunder 2 weeks ago
@Flamesofthunder so without your empire you would have been crushes btw you cant blockade a country when its self sufficent they werent even recieving supplies from the Atlantic also the Germans if not stoped in Italy by the US and halted because of D day would have new U boats capable of making Britains Navy look like rubber ducks and reguardless if Germany was defeated the same thing would happen just with a soviet flag they would eventualy get there hands on German Naval and Airforce tech
MetalicaFan2007 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
Flamesofthunder 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MetalicaFan2007
We are talking about the civil war not the World wars German Technology has always been on the forefront, they devolved missiles and jet plane helicopters and much before any other nation. However the might of the British Lies within in our will we possess(which we currently lost)The main reasons we lost the war is more people saw it as more beneficial if the US was interdependent If we did go all out we would probably have a war on 3 fronts
Flamesofthunder 2 weeks ago
@MetalicaFan2007 Wait a minute, did you really just say Britain LOST to America in 1812?!?!?!?! You call being easily repulsed from Canada and having your capital city + whitehouse being burned WINNING?????? Britain and Canada won the war of 1812 after you unprovkingly attacked their territories......
TalonMercenary 1 week ago
@TalonMercenary we beat you on the Great lakes then again at new orleans you took washington because we evacuated it because our army was not big enough to hold it
and we didnt unprovokingly attack your territories ever here of impressment? thats as well as paying the Indians to attack westward settlements. Britain was fighting a war with America through third parties long before 1812
MetalicaFan2007 1 week ago
@TalonMercenary and reguardless with France and spain breathing down your back an all out war with the US would have simply made Britain weaker Andrew jacksons small army held off new orleans against a majority of the british navy and won
then on the great lakes the british navy lost to the US navy which ment we controlled the great lakes DC was a fluke you landed there and burned it because thats european stlye warfare. however we would just keep moving the cap untill we won
btw Fallout3 FTW
MetalicaFan2007 1 week ago
@MetalicaFan2007 Actually the fact that Andrew Jacksons army won was the fluke since we were the superpower then not you :)
iiShaanop 1 week ago
@iiShaanop not realy you had the advantages on all fronts but still lost taking over an unguarded city and burning it for no reason was stupid not a fluke i rephrase my answer
MetalicaFan2007 1 week ago
@MetalicaFan2007 We burnt it because the american army burnt some public buildings in Canada (Toronto)
iiShaanop 1 week ago
@iiShaanop its European style warfare burn the capital win the war
MetalicaFan2007 1 week ago
@Flamesofthunder this has been shown time and time again and to be truthful if the British didnt treat the US like there personal Piggy bank Prision and Resource hub we probably would have no problem staying with Britiain the First continental congress made that very clear then king george in laymens terms told us to kiss his ass and we did if by kiss you mean kick and ass you mean nuts
MetalicaFan2007 2 weeks ago
@Flamesofthunder this is true
gingafunk4073 1 week ago
I think we can all agree that if anyone could unite the world as one, it would be an Anglo-Germanic alliance.
BrashOfKhaamph 2 weeks ago
If we had lost the war, Britain would owe a lot of money to China...
zell2929 2 weeks ago 15
@zell2929 lol perhaps :)
alternatehistorypt 2 weeks ago
@zell2929 As it is the UK is the 3rd largest holder of US debt, after China and Japan.
alexsau91 2 weeks ago
@zell2929 If you had lost the war, you'd likely have gained independance anyway. Personally, I wonder what the modern world would have been like if the American colonies had gained parliamentary representation as they demanded.
VinnyMonster1 1 week ago
I know this is all made up and a fantasy exercise but... it would be funnier or friendlier for the rest of us if you didn't unify Germany with England in all your videos... Specially being a very weird/awkward/impossible thing to happen.
Also, don't unify the "double monarchies" like nothing lol, that NEVER happened in history (as in 2 empires unify all of a sudden").
To finish, WHY does the Earth Empire have the English flag as the main flag? It should be a new flag for everyone...
asdfomfglol 3 weeks ago
Hehe, if America had lost the war, England would still be an empire and Canada would be a bigger country.
pspboy7 3 weeks ago
Listen you motherfuckers it was FRANCE who fought the revolutionary war for you not America
cleverdogbert 3 weeks ago
@cleverdogbert lol, yeah right.
Valholm 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
eeikman 3 weeks ago
Why are people getting so irritated by this, it is not real and we all know it. I am British and I know that the USA are an ally, and any American reading this know that we are their allies.
God Bless America
God Save the Queen
MrXray2011 4 weeks ago
@MrXray2011 thanks for watching and liking my video :)
alternatehistorypt 4 weeks ago
@alternatehistorypt np :)
MrXray2011 4 weeks ago
@alternatehistorypt if this happened, US won't be one of the powerful countries in the world!
Solja2010 3 weeks ago
@Solja2010 although if the US lost the war Britain would still be one of the most powerful nations in the world.
dagamer555 3 weeks ago
@RyanBrooksby Art thou discontented, bretheren?
CAHiredGun 4 weeks ago
that would of been better!!!!
tomthompson8 1 month ago
@RyanBrooksby you may return to your hole now.
CAHiredGun 1 month ago
@CAHiredGun
Well since you provided no actual argument, well, then I only see you as a child. You insult because you can't provide a counter-argument.
USA sucked, Why? We FOUNDED USA, obviously we're going to be Better...
RyanBrooksby 4 weeks ago
Didn't watch it as soon as i heard German music playing.
infidel1978 1 month ago
If The british empire had all of it's territorys global poverty would be down by 15%. FACT
Strangefingshappen 1 month ago
Why the ode to joy?
MrGilles1990 1 month ago
If only....
StamfordMax 1 month ago
If it was so much better, then i ask you people, why did BRITISH citizens, leave their own country? If all was good and well?
Dumbasses, the British Empire during it's time served the position America does now, and not a single country gave it respect, it went through countless recessions, increases in taxes, global warfare, mass genocide, the killing of it's own people and numerous revolutions in it's distant ocupations.
i'm not saying America's the better, but neither is Britian.
Nameinprogression 1 month ago
@Nameinprogression
Britain was better than America, not perfect but better.
I mean, come on America didn't abolish slavery for another 60 years.
The 13 colonies (everyone who WASN'T Washington or his army) did not want to be American, they wanted to remain under the Crown, and nonetheless George had to abandon his colony to fight France, so the 13 colonies were forced to become American.
RyanBrooksby 1 month ago
@RyanBrooksby Keep in mind how young a country America is. If you wanna compare notes, the British had slaves for 1,000s of years.
Nameinprogression 1 month ago
@Nameinprogression
Yes, but Britain abolished Slavery...
America however took another 60 years to do so, even though the entire world (even the fucking Ottoman Empire!) had abolished Slavery.
Plus, England's army was 1/3 Sikh.
England wasn't exactly very bad, at times it was, but it was better than America.
RyanBrooksby 1 month ago
@RyanBrooksby Yes Britian abolished slavery after 1,000 years. America did after 60, it's a young country.
Besides is slavery your only point?
America didn't kill it's own people, it didn't condemn the poor and in-debt to work homes and death. Get over yourself, and study your history, Britian isn't very noble.
Nameinprogression 1 month ago
@Nameinprogression
Yes, because Medieval Warlords would really abolish Slavery.
It wasn't how they thought back then, and even so, no they didn't, because Slavery earned...no money in Medieval times. In Medieval times it was more exploiting Plebeians/Commoners, than actual Slaves.
I'm remarking how everybody else in the world had Democratic rights, whereas America FORCED it's own colonies to become American.
Well I mean, the 13 colonies were forced to become part of USA.
RyanBrooksby 1 month ago
@RyanBrooksby They weren't though. If you knew American history, the delegates from each colony took a poll in their home state and a majority of people in each state voted to become a whole nation. Besides after Britian rummucked through the New England and southern colonies by pilliaging and burning they lost all popular support with the crown.
So no, it was optional. Also? If the "FOUNDER" of America is going to be better, why aren't we flying British flags over our buildings?
Nameinprogression 1 month ago
@Nameinprogression
Oh my god, were do you get your information? This is bullshit, all of it.
The 13 colonies NEVER wanted to be American. They wanted to be BRITISH. Because after George had to abandon them, they unwillingly had to become British. It caused a lot of arguments in Washington D.C.
I bet you don't even know what Defence Scheme No.1 is nor why Britain never used it.
RyanBrooksby 1 month ago
@RyanBrooksby LOL! You have got to be making stuff up now. Because what i'm saying is bullshit? Yeah OKAY, i'm going to assume this your little way of making yourself feel better, okay?
Nameinprogression 1 month ago
@Nameinprogression
Well since you didn't even provide proof, then you're chatting bullshit.
Come on, the 13 colonies went there, UNDER THE CROWN.
Wasington just wanted power. I mean, look at America, they wanted to annex Canada and if they had any land near it, I knew they'd try and annex Australia and New Zealand too.
America despises sovereign countries, especially those under the crown.
But, I'm not patriotic. Nope. I hate all Governments on Earth, so don't assume I'm
RyanBrooksby 1 month ago
@Nameinprogression
(continued)
Some nationalist idiot. I KNOW the difference between USA/Britain.
And given that America fails to be a democracy (it's a Republic) whilst Britain is...well, a Democracy, then we can automatically realize Britain is better.
People can't vote in Republics for things. Yes, elections, but who voted for Vietnam? Libya? No one. America just did another Leeroy Jenkins entry into wars.
RyanBrooksby 1 month ago
@RyanBrooksby @Nameinprogression do both of you have nothing better to do? got get a life don't sit on youtube all day long tackling bullshit.
dagamer555 3 weeks ago
@Nameinprogression
And yes, yes it did, like every fucking Nation on Earth.
Stop blaming Britain, obviously the FOUNDER of America is going to be better than America since As you said, America is a young country.
RyanBrooksby 1 month ago
The worst mistake the US ever made was seceding from Britain. And now the US has blighted the world with an economic crisis and hatred all around. I can't wait to get to the UK, and get out of this blasted country.
jacobjedi2 1 month ago
Wot? No Content?
macnadoodle 1 month ago
@macnadoodle it is in the description box :)
alternatehistorypt 1 month ago
AMAZING! im sure ive dreamt it before..
Youkn8wm9 1 month ago
Thanks for a huge fucking waste of time
judgedredd123 1 month ago
@judgedredd123 The explanation is on the description dude..
Master4897 1 month ago
@Saavykass lol. But I think Britannia should,ve allied with the Japanese, so that we could take britain back from the Damned French!!!!!!!!!
Mezworld 1 month ago
why do the americans not get it. The Americans were British and the British were British so what do you get. Answear British fighting British.civil war. remember you had another. So what you are saying is that the southern states were a differant nation. 85% of the Us poulation went to the USA in the 1800's.
chad24ist 1 month ago
awnser: the world would be a better place
mrmattusftw 1 month ago 25
@mrmattusftw thanks for watching and commenting my video :)
alternatehistorypt 1 month ago
@mrmattusftw U kidding, it would be worst. The BRITISH EMPIRE was violent and would conquer and tax the crap out of any one.
DOSU344 1 month ago
@DOSU344
Explain.
People in London paid the most taxes, and they could afford to pay them.
Taxes played no part in the USA splitting off, they didn't want to be ruled from London. However 1/3 of America did not want USA independance, they wanted the Crown, but the USA forced Britain to leave using the French as allies (so they did no work in the war, losing every battle and making France do their dirty work) and so the 13 colonies were FORCED to become American.
RyanBrooksby 1 month ago
@DOSU344 no we would release you as equals like we did with india and aussies!!!
gingafunk4073 1 week ago
@mrmattusftw your fucking stupid.
JeRseybOy251 1 month ago
@mrmattusftw for the soviets nazis and imperial china or most likely the British empire which were just as bad would still be around since we were the colony that realy got Britain kicking
MetalicaFan2007 2 weeks ago
@MetalicaFan2007 India and Africa were the main colonies, we made more from tea, diamonds and slaves than anything else.
England4eva89 2 weeks ago
@England4eva89 you wouldent have anyone to sell the slaves to without us would ya? not to mention most millitary resources came from the US
MetalicaFan2007 1 week ago
@mrmattusftw I don't think so, it would be the same but as the tommies being invading countries for its oil.
Zeta439 2 weeks ago
@mrmattusftw Pfft, Britain would just displace the various roles that the US have played during the 20th\21st century, same people control both the nations.
XpEAnUTBuTtERsUckSX 1 week ago
@warpunk1 I firmly believe that if the American War of Independence was won by Great Britain, neither world wars would have ever occured. Afterall, Germany under the Kaiser, had been childishly competing with the British Royal Navy in ship production since the turn of the century, and had secretely built up for massed industrial warfare since 1909 - all to get one up over the British, in the Germans great envy. Had Britain been twice the power it was by the in actual history...NONE WOULD DARE :]
ThePalaeontologist 1 month ago
@warpunk1 It cannot be denied that the World Wars took the wind out of Britains once proud sails...it managed to get over WWI after colossal damages - like everyone else had suffered of course - but ran straight into the Wall Street Crash etc. Just after picking up territories in the Middle East and such places from the crushed Ottoman Empire etc. This would lead to a destabilisation that would become untennable after the titanic events of WW2...which finally knocked the British Empire O.O.A
ThePalaeontologist 1 month ago
The first and second world wars would have been over much sooner, if they had even happened at all.
jacksawild 1 month ago
@jacksawild thanks for watching and commenting :)
alternatehistorypt 1 month ago
If usa lost the war, it would probably become a commonwealth like australia or canada. No matter what, colonial age was ending anyway.
mantuskas1 1 month ago
I think we all know that had the Revolutionary War gone to the British, it would have resulted in the eventual formation of the Empire of Britannia. And wars would be fought with mecha on wheels.
But we would still somehow have Pizza Hut!
Saavykaas 1 month ago
The Revolution was COMPLETELY unnecessary and was fought to protect corrupt smugglers who were going to be hurt by tarrifs that were going to ensure a better quality product for the people.
The world would probably be better.
BorsBaledwyr 1 month ago
@BorsBaledwyr With such a huge, world-changing entity (like the changes or not), the effects of a lost Revolutionary War in the 13 colonies would have such far-reaching and pervasive effects that frankly it would be difficult to determine them all, much less the world that would result over 200 years later.
You could be right, but don't be so very certain in your wording.
Saavykaas 1 month ago
ah! if only the yanks did lose, at least there would not be any big headed bastards in the world
456Beethoven 1 month ago
@456Beethoven History proves there's always going to someone somewhere that's a "big headed bastard" in the world. Were it not the US, it would be somewhere else. Maybe it would have been the English instead.
Saavykaas 1 month ago
stupid ass shit
TheSmf4u 1 month ago
@Scottish036 WHY IS IT ILLEGAL TO DIE IN THE PARLIAMENT?!?!?!?!
SteamMonkey115 1 month ago
ahhhh the UN... another name for the British Empire
ewdennis 1 month ago
If we had lost the revolutionary war we would have health insurance now.
pchtermino1 1 month ago 39
@pchtermino1 yes you probably would :)
alternatehistorypt 1 month ago 3
@pchtermino1 so you mean to say that Britain has a very good health insurance?
kj293 1 month ago
@gab10hp (sarcastically) yea, because the only reason that Nazi Germany started declaring war on Europe is because the US won its independence. WTF?
SasquatchAirsoft 1 month ago
Comment removed
toweronepower 2 months ago
Apparently they get an absolutely hideous flag and Ode to Joy as an anthem? ..okaayy.
Udany147 2 months ago
Hehe ou americans are fools....we wanted this to happen!, we knew if we became thebigest empire we would be hated, so we honerably "lost" to you chaps who have taken over and become our greatest ally, and when you all fail, and most of the world rebaels against the superpower...ENGLAND WILL RISE AND RECLAIM WHAT IS RIGHTFULLY OURS.... no one sees it coming :p
Shineypillz 2 months ago
@Shineypillz Well wouldn't that be something.
VonTavast 2 months ago
@Shineypillz Hell I could care less I like England. Although eventually every superpower abuses it power regardless. The problem is governments not the people. Patriotism & nationalism are plagues. People don't like this because their pride gets in the way. We are a very individualism country unfortunately and don't take others views as important as we should. All people deserve to have a say but so is history.
BlazinNSoul 2 months ago
@BlazinNSoul woah so mutch srysness o.o, i was just kidding dude, didnt actually mean anything by it
Shineypillz 2 months ago
@Scottish036 thanks for watching and commenting my video :)
alternatehistorypt 2 months ago
GOD save the Queen!!
artstudent07 2 months ago
Nice. Any chance you're writing this as a full length Novel?
BlutoUSN 2 months ago 2
@BlutoUSN no but I wrotte a book yes, I'll send it to you the video. Happy new year :)
alternatehistorypt 2 months ago
If America lost the war, then there would be world peace.
gab10hp 2 months ago
@gab10hp maybe yes or maybe no, thanks for watching :)
alternatehistorypt 2 months ago
@gab10hp Only if you want the Nazis controlling Europe and the Japanese Empire stretching the whole East Asia-Pacific Region. Causing the Soviet Union to get its dignity back and endless war between Nazi Europe and the Soviet Union in East Europe. Without America the Soviet Union wouldn't of fell because of them losing the Afghanistan War.
owen82100 2 months ago
@owen82100 But we would've probably gotten our independence EVENTUALLY. Canada did.
gab10hp 2 months ago
@gab10hp Every Nation has had its independence since the Statue of Westminister 1936 and the British Empire was gone in 1997 with the hand over of Hong Kong, But the Queen still reigns over UK, Australia, Canada and NZ and 16 Commonwealth Realms.
owen82100 2 months ago
@owen82100 Who's to say the Soviet Union would have even existed? If Britain held what is now the US the resources and man power gains would have given them enough to rule over greater swathes of territory, or at the very least given them far more economical power than they had (which at it's height was supreme). Remember, the Empire was carried on the back of commerce as much as military might. Many would argue more so.
TalesOfWar 2 months ago
@gab10hp no it would just be the UK doing americas job
cptair1 2 months ago
@gab10hp No, the world will always go to war.
sneakyshadow7 1 month ago
You know what? I don't think I'd mind living in a British-ruled world, and I'm American.
Gamebox27 2 months ago
its funny that most of the people who disliked dont know the meaning of Alternate from real
ryanash123r 2 months ago
Well now, that's just silly. Just a point - there are easier ways to make military alliances than to unite the royal families of two separate countries. Plus, if you have tension building up between alliances, the way that doesn't ever end is those two alliances joining together to beat on the rest of the world. If there were tendencies that leaned that way in the first place, the world would have been dominated by the Macengolian empire for the last 2,000 years.
EvansRowan123 2 months ago
You might want to read the book, "For Want of a Nail" which is an alternate history on this subject. As for the Royal houses of Europe splitting the way you suggest, I remind you that George III was a Hanover, the same as many of the rulers of the German states as well as related to the Swedish King. His mother was a Saxe-Gotha, also royalty in Europe. He was concurrently ruler of the UK and prince-elector of Brunswick-Lüneburg. I doubt very much things would have gone as you suggest.
jonpetry 2 months ago
@jonpetry The current royal family is Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, and they renamed themselves as 'Windsor' during the 20th century to distance themselves from Germany and solidify their British identity. There were plenty of opportunities for England to rise with Germany in both the First and Second World Wars, but English culture easily won out over the Central European ties of the Royal family.
Migratoryprimate 2 months ago
With the wealth of the 13 colonies going to London, instead of New York, and with a more distant, and disinterested administration in London instead of Washington D.C, the 13 colonies would have grown much slower. London would reinvest money into England, wheras New York would reinvest money into the 13 colonies. Secondly, the issue of distance would make London less effcient in administrative, and financial investments for the 13 colonies. Lastly, people prosper with greater self determination.
InfiniteUniverse88 2 months ago
i think that the UK would take over most of the world sence they were the most powerfull cuntry in it's time after they defeated the spanish armada
Redrocker009 2 months ago
This "anthelm" is ODE TO JOY (Beethoven, 9 th. symphony)
MagoDaniel01 2 months ago
oh god
hiimnice10 2 months ago
The Rhodesian national anthem?
rapartist43 3 months ago
@rapartist43 No , it's the European :)
alternatehistorypt 3 months ago
@alternatehistorypt It really also is the Rhodesian. It is called "Rise, O, voices of Rhodesia / God,may we thy bounty share / give us strength to face all danger / and where challenge is to dare." Beethoven's Symphony No. 9, which is used by the EU as well.
rapartist43 3 months ago
@alternatehistorypt no, its ode to joy dummies
cadettaff112 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CAPITALISM creates ELITE CRIMINALS. BANKERS. DRUG LORDS. INEQUALITY. INSECURITY. GREED. RUTHLESS COMMUNISM. NWO. NAZI. TERRORISM. LAZY PEOPLE. REBEL POLITICIAN. ANARCHY. worst is WAR etc.. etc..
CAPITALISM was designed only for CORRUPT OPPORTUNISTIC MANIPULATIVE LAZY POLITICIAN. BANKERS. LAWYERS. DRUG LORDS. JUDGES. CRIMINALS. DICTATORS. RULERS. KING. SULTANATE. EMPEROR etc. etc..
HARD WORKING PEACE LOVING HAPPY HONEST SOCIETY were always the slave victim and poorly starve to death. :(
kopellhinex 2 months ago
Comment removed
SharksRule567 2 months ago in playlist More videos from alternatehistorypt
yeah even if we beat the americans, i doubt the spanish and french would have let us take the whole of the americas, we wouldn't have took the world
TheAshy14 3 months ago
@TheAshy14 Both the french and spanish were defeated in par with Britains resources alone, Had They had the manpower and resources of the US behind them .. .well
1MagicAndMayhem1 3 months ago
viva la republica! abajo el fascismo!
Biel7318 3 months ago
16. British Imperium military strength estimated at 19,000,000 units, with a Grand Surface Fleet total number of 3,600 ships. 17. Britain has a monopoly on the trade of the world and is unrivalled in technological advances. 18. South America is in turmoil in anticipation of the invasion of the British in earnest. 19. By 1960, British Imperium demolishes the last resistance in South America. 20. By 1975-2000, British Imperium controls the entire world. PAX BRITANNIA MAGNIFICENS-PANGAEA ULTIMA
ThePalaeontologist 3 months ago
Here is what would and would not happen; 1.The British capture all of the Northern American continent, perhaps taking another decade after the original end of the war to reach the western seaboard. 2.The spoils and long term income from these places funds massive expansion in the British military - which is also rewarded due to the achievements made. 3. South America is given greater interest, and all the coastal provinces on at least are captured within 60 years of the AWofI. Meanwhilst...
ThePalaeontologist 3 months ago
@ThePalaeontologist ...4. India is conquered. 5. French possessions in the Far East and Africa totally secured for Great Britain. 6. East India Trading company flourishes far greater than it ever really did, intentions on China and Mongolia are pressed and by year 1850 the majority of Indo-China is taken. 7. Africa is sought after, with competition with other European powers being light, as now the British are far too powerful to contend with. 8. As a side note, Napoleonic Wars never happen...
ThePalaeontologist 3 months ago
@ThePalaeontologist ....due to the threat of a superior might of the British contingent in mainland Europe if war ever broke out. Britain helps maintain the French monarchy - with France beaten in the AWofI too, they sue for peace and terms with Britain. British interests are to prevent rebellious revolutions or french invasions from Republic Army; they send soldiers to aid the weakened French Royalist army to defend the crown. Napoleon never becomes famous or more than a captain....
ThePalaeontologist 3 months ago
@ThePalaeontologist ...9.Indonesia and the Phillipines taken by 1870. 10. By 1875, the British Imperium has grown almost unsustainable; the land space occupied cannot be protected and held against enemies and any rebels. Aware of the fatal effect this had on the Roman Empire, the British government sanctions the instigation of radical changes to the Imperial army - a force of 2 Million soldiers soon defends the Empire, and the Royal Navy is increased by 60% in warship tonnage.....
ThePalaeontologist 3 months ago
@ThePalaeontologist 11.Russia declares alliance with Mongolia and the Baltic States around 1870's or 1880's as concerns grow amongst the mainland Europeans. British warships blockade Copenhagen and other ports of this new enemy. Within months, Prussia, Austria and Spain also declare war on Britain in joining this grand alliance. 12. Zulu defeated in Natal; Isandlwana never occurs. 13. Africa British territorial sector secured. 14. Rebellions in China and India. Suppressed.....
ThePalaeontologist 3 months ago
@ThePalaeontologist ...15. Franco-Prussian War of 1870 never happens; Royalist France owes its survival to Britain, and fights as its protectorate in the Britannic War Against the Alliance of Ruso-Baltica. Titanic land and naval battles drag on into the 20th Century. British power is tested but the warring allows the justification of constant growth of the armed forces. Eventually Sweden, Denmark and Mongolia cecede from the alliance in surrender. Russia bankrupts itself, leading to revolution.
ThePalaeontologist 3 months ago
@ThePalaeontologist ...Which forces her out of the war. Pruso-Austrian remnant army forces prove to be stubborn rivals to defeat easily, though after much bloodshed the British army curtails the rise of the Germanic states. Of course, by now around 1911, there has been no chance of Germany ever forming for 40 years already - BOTH WORLD WARS ARE OBVIOUSLY NEGATED. British triumph. Fall of Europe save for France assured. Spain was mainly inactive, yet fought on till 1920 until crushed...
ThePalaeontologist 3 months ago
Comment removed
ThePalaeontologist 3 months ago
Lame.
ToastBusta 3 months ago
The sign would be carried by jets, over the UK just as Russia fired ZERO-0, destroying the sign. Korea would create the death star and blow up the world. The end. oh and i notice that there have been some harsh comments towards Great Britain. We are allies are we not? if we were not here you wouldnt be either.
skipperacedude 3 months ago
which had the capacity to blow up a england and prepare to get revenge on us. America would also want an act of revenge, from the slavery of the British Empire, and create a giant sign to show off their victory, this would be so big it was the size of the whole of the UK. the sign would say: You Stink!
skipperacedude 3 months ago
@skipperacedude As much as this video is lame and does credit to no nation at all, your comments are more ridiculous still. The British freed the slaves in 1804, and prior to this, had in the American War of Independence, freed Black slaves of the colonies (many of which served in the army, not because of being forced, but due to lack of alternative employment) Your beloved USA was fighting its Civil War on the grounds of slavery over HALF A CENTURY later. Show some sense and see my point stands
ThePalaeontologist 3 months ago
Britain would loose USA, North Africa, Australia and Canada however we will keep controll of everything else. The chinese empire would also face huge revolts and former Russia would become, USSR. China would be wiped out and re-established as eutopia. USSR would use the industry of the early eutopian empire to create a death ray called ZERO-0,
skipperacedude 3 months ago
china would then want an empire and invade Russia, Korea, Japan and New zealand. Britain would not interfere, (Breaking our treaty with russia.) and focus on a new indusrialised era. when queen Victoria takes the throne. England will become a povertised country however with the nececery equipment to start a conquest, this would turn out to be the great british empire. this would last about 87 years before independance should start to spring up around the world,
skipperacedude 3 months ago
and we would take back europe and advance on russia, the war would stop when the British forces freeze in the Russian winter adn a treaty would be signed making England and Russia allies and allowing all the countries to regain their land. (in the war, only Britain would advance on Russia because europe would be weak.
skipperacedude 3 months ago
wouldn't care if USA was controlled by UK because nothing really would have changed. Great Britain would then have had the chance to build a huge global empire, however we wont take it because we dont care about global domination or anything, (as history claims.) The russians should then realise how weak the rest of europe is and start a campain of domination. obviously this would drag us into war, (it's a habit.)
skipperacedude 3 months ago
Here is my opnion on what would have happened globaly if we (Great Britain) won. firstly france would get all angry and attempt to invade the UK, HOWEVER, Britain would simply destroy their armada under the lead of admiral lord Horatio Nelson, (Was he around that time? we dont learn about the revolutionary war in history. please correct if i'm wrong.) i dont believe any other countries would intervine because Spain had a crippled armada and the rest of the world wouldn't care because
skipperacedude 3 months ago
Beethoven's Ode To Joy, a germanic composition, to represent an eternal British dominion? Ummmm . . . no.
kurtjk01 3 months ago
I hate these youtube videos where nothing happens, just music and a still frame picture.... BTW, what is the flag in the top left corner? Is it the 13 colonies or somthing????
cadwalauni 3 months ago
Sorry but France and the USA allied together never lost one war & cannot lose a war !! ^^
Thus of course the UK would never have been able to win against France and the USA united as they were it during the American Independance War. ^^
Thus this video is not alternative, it is just DECEPTIVE & STUPID :-)
cumbas 3 months ago
@cumbas Vietnam.
blandman46 3 months ago
Comment removed
cumbas 3 months ago
@blandman46
What little roastbeef ?
Learn the History non-educated kid LOL
Vietnam was a French Indochine before
A former French colony and France very tired by the WW2 lost the Indochina War in 1949 ALONE vs Communist from Indochine & China especially because The USA dont wanted to help France...
Vietnam War ?
When France fought allied with the USA in the Vietmam war ? LOL
The USA was alone and lost ALONE this war also
SO I CONFIRM : FRANCE & THE USA TOGETHER & ALLIED NEVER LOST A WAR :-)
cumbas 3 months ago
@cumbas USA provided 80% of the war fund to France, as well as 300,000 pieces of equipment and small arms. It also gave Air and Naval support. All during the Indochina War. I don't call that "alone". It also ended in 1954. So herp derp to you sir.
But a nice try neverthe less.
blandman46 3 months ago
@blandman46
in your dreams maybe...
The only geopolitical fact especially in the end of the Indochine War is that the USA wanted get out France of his old colony to take his place...
& they made a success of that by helping really never the French on the ground...
BUT to know in their turn the war in the same region some years later ^^
cumbas 3 months ago
Should of just let us win...
dunglebud 3 months ago
Preserve the balance between likes and dislikes!
AAA999XYZ 3 months ago
For an America that loses the revolutionary war I see two major possibilities, America becomes part of the "commonwealth" not unlike canada or Australia where it maintains a loose amount of autonomy while being closely associated with Britain, or America's independence takes a back seat only to remerge later, such as in the civil war where Britain provided support to the Confederacy, Or, like India, America gains its independence after europe is broken by its world wars.
bnallek 3 months ago
WOO ENGLAND, fuck america
123Mastermega 3 months ago
Someday Malta will rule you all with a rod of iron and the Death Sentence shall be imposed on you for at least 300 offences.
Kelly14UK 3 months ago
Outstanding when U.$.A. is for $ale for 16 trillion dollar$
starlost1957 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ANGLO-AMERICAN CANCER. THE USA WAS PROVINCE OF GREEK MYCENEAN EMPIRE
unfukkkmee 4 months ago
This how it should be ...
TheAnimatorEqualizer 4 months ago
you guys do realize ur using the wrong song? I dont see y colonized N.America would have to ode to joy (that is used by the EU) for its anthem, epic fail
suntbelgae 4 months ago
Would have gained independence in the future even if Britain had won
TalonMercenary 4 months ago
Not possible. if the American Colonies had lost the Revolutionary War then at the very least it would have gained it's independance sometime after the death of King George and the Reign of Queen Elizabeth II. What would the United States look like? well they may have been provinces like Canada... or seperate states like any other nation state. To many variables.
Vutxzzn2 4 months ago