Its sad we will never see this, stupid super powers of the world want to use underground and above ground transit systems instead of super sonic vtols :( they plan to build bridges that go across the ocean, underground trains ect :( Now we wont have a chance to create a new space shuttle :(
How can these people making a passenger plane have any credibility when they say it's hypersonic but only goes to mach 4? I sure don't want to fly in it if it's designed by stupid people.
Zero emission ? Yes because it's liquid propellants (hydrogen + oxygen) motorized, plus it will land thanks to two traditional turbojets functioning with algocarburants !
Firstly, shouldn't it be SUPERsonic transport? If it's not at least Mach 5, then it's not hypersonic.
At any rate, it looks fantastic; like a civilian Blackbird....but by 2050, the world will be a very different place -- as a concept however, it's beautiful, it's just a shame it couldn't exist now in today's world.
it sucks, is 1000 times better the project of bwb, that is zero emission, it is a huge expensive plane like concords, they want use france people money to make a plane for rich person that are less in the society. FRANCE GOV SUCKS, instead of invest on people and to better their condition, they censor internet and spend public money for make rich people to live better and arrive more faster than poor people!!!
Airplanes that only exist in computers can do anything. including fly at Mach4 on nothing but seaweed. In my computer, my bicycle can circle the world in 3 hours without even pedalling.
Seriously though, the SR-71 got so hot at Mach3 it took hours to cool down after landing. Whats this new plane going to be built of that outperforms titanium alloys and does not get hot?
3 seaweed engines successfully combined into one airplane?
EADS designers are smoking something, and it ain't seaweed!
@femanvate I think they would have figured that out if they would show the design at an airshow. There are things that can withstand higher temperatures than titanium alloys, such as the Space Shuttle's TPS. The SR-71 did not get that hot compared to the Space Shuttle, only about 300 °C. The X-15 rocket plane once achieved a speed of mach 6—it suffered damage but survived. The degree to which it will heat up depends partly on the altitude. It can be reduced with an active cooling system
such as that used in the nozzles of the space shuttle's main engines. Their exhaust was hot enough to melt them, but they were kept cool by fuel pumped through tubes in their walls.
After landing, the SR-71 could not be approached, because it was hotter than the inside of an oven, 300 °C (572 °F). If the ZEHST is built, it may need to be cooled at least around the door area before you can get out.
The temperature it reaches may also depend on the altitude. Lower pressure=less friction
Bio-fuel is still a hydro-carbon fuel. It dumps just as much carbon in the atmosphere as fossil fuel. Burning bio-fuel is NOT considered zero emissions.
First plane made would be so flawed it would explode and kill every passenger. make a fucking car first than can run on hydrogen. One is not enough (the Honda clarity)
God damn people are stupid, hydrogen by itself is highly flammable, same with oxygen thust creating an explosion, explosion = thrust, thrust = momentum and when you mix hydrogen and oxygen gases together you get water vapor, hence zero emission
@AjaxpuffNstuff its not zero emmisson like you said it emits water as a by product of the hydrogen oxygen reaction. Same thing happens with space shuttles when they take off they will create a large rain cloud.
The love has been given John 3:16 " For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life."
The love has been given, don't let it pass you, love is patient, it is waiting for you, God is waiting.
@Born2Snoboard10 Tears is pretty close, actually. Probably a lot less ions though lol. However, my knee-jerk reaction is also one of skepticism with regards to hydrogen-powered turbojets, and such pissy ones too, considering you would have to accelerate a massive amount of liquid-fuel bulk to takeoff speed with similarly pissy little wings providing very little lift at low speed.
Yo ass jockey, how about some research before being a smartass, you must be from California, fucking tree huger. Being one you should already know that hydrogen and oxygen pollute so so much.
@Born2Snoboard10 The Rockets run on hydrogen and oxygen which it doesn't take a genius to work out make.... you guessed it water! O yeah and it uses biofuel to take off.
Well ... Airbus say they will have passenger jets with see through cabins by the year 2050... if thats the best they can do in 40 odd years of development then this Zehst must be 3 maybe 400 years of production... gay why even bother releasing this =/
How is it a Zero emission vehicle when burning bio-fuels releases emissions? How fast would it fall apart if one of those widely spaced engines died and cause the plane to yaw at Mach 4?
@MrGAPerry the "zero emission' thing comes from the hydrogen based fuel cells for the boosters and ramjets - the turbojets that do require biofuel, for take off as well as the small amount their used for landing as well, are just a small fraction of the total flight; the turbo jets are not even used to accelerate the plane beyond mach 0.8. As far as a catastrophic event at mach 4.... well... the plane would still make it to London, at least pieces of it.
Looks likes a rip off of the Blackbird and NASA's concept of a ramjet plane. Anyone can make a concept and say what it will do. There's a reason why the Concord failed and it only flies 2x the speed of sound.
Cruise altitude of 32,000m (105,000ft) corresponds to time of useful consciousness of less than 9 seconds.
So this animation depicting passengers wearing regular business suits looking out of standard sized airliner windows is not very likely. But requiring passengers to wear pressure suits sounds so dangerous...
As usual, the issue is more about market acceptance than about technology.
The Problem is not to built such an airplane, even one with mach 10 could be built.
But having one that flies to a reliable price for the passenger is.Taking in account all the money for invention and the fact that these jets never get produced in large numbers like an Airbus A330 or Boing 747.
Why you think ONE B2 Bomber is worth $2.87 billion?
@SuperTruth77 Hopefully your investors check out your other posts jackass.. Like the one where you claim to father a child with a deployed soldiers wife. Good luck with your funding there skippy
@graffitiphat the concord was old, simple as that. not efficient and expensive to maintain. and playnes like that go super sonic many miles downrange and on altitude from the airport.
We already have Jet's that go mach 4.. I don't understand why it hasn't gone commercial yet.. We've had the technology forever... Oh wait.. Capitalism - thats' why! =]
@judoisoww Zehst would use three different propulsion systems. The aircraft would take off powered by two turbofans and undertake a steep climb reaching around Mach 0.8 at which point two rocket boosters would kick in to propel the vehicle to Mach 2.5 at which point two underwing ramjets would kick in to reach speeds above Mach 4. Cruising altitude would be just above the atmosphere. The aircraft would glide during decent, with the turbofans powering up again in the final stage of flight.
@Banez1991 it doesn't say if the rocket engines are liquid fueled or solid fueled. if solid fueled, it wouldnt have liquid nitrogen and liquid oxygen tanks. it would make more sense to have solid fuel rockets as they are much lighter. downside: less control can't be switched off once started.. its probably as bad! i wouldnt want to get on this thing!
K, so we know planes can go fast. Cool, but whatever. We know that rick people can afford to fly in tiny jets... right, k. What *I* want to know is how the fuck do you make a zero emissions jet? That's the important part. Forget how fast it can go or how rich you'd have to be to get a ticket.
im sorry but the interior looks pretty shitty just like a Delta airlines plane, PTV's really? at least make it futuristic and add some PC tablets or ipads! it will be better if the windows would be bigger too it will create less fatigue!
well considering its just a simulator and not the final product, Im sure the interior isnt the first thing they are worried about, creating the commercial plane/engine to go that fast would be their first priority.
This has been flagged as spam show
current videos: Nicki Minaj -Super bass.. wtf?
malimarieytt 4 months ago
Its sad we will never see this, stupid super powers of the world want to use underground and above ground transit systems instead of super sonic vtols :( they plan to build bridges that go across the ocean, underground trains ect :( Now we wont have a chance to create a new space shuttle :(
MultiIPwnage 5 months ago
Very nice. And have you seen this other EADS concept plane ?
.youtube.com/eadstv#p/c/E2CF0F65A3AF26B1/9/3fHy-i_IOwA
LesTPcestbien 5 months ago
AND it's not zero emissions. Seems like they got this one all wrong. Or they just gave it a cool name to get other stupid people interested.
chally212 5 months ago
How can these people making a passenger plane have any credibility when they say it's hypersonic but only goes to mach 4? I sure don't want to fly in it if it's designed by stupid people.
chally212 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@chally212 I don't think you will have to even worry about it as I'm sure you won't be able to afford a ticket for it.
Mortifix 3 months ago
Zero emission ? Yes because it's liquid propellants (hydrogen + oxygen) motorized, plus it will land thanks to two traditional turbojets functioning with algocarburants !
abdael22 6 months ago
Greetings.
I am looking for a company or university interested in this technology.
.youtube.com/watch?v=_EZ0Amyc7_w
Saludos.
Estoy buscando una compañía o universidad interesada en esta tecnología.
.youtube.com/watch?v=_EZ0Amyc7_w
aerodisco 7 months ago
i dont get it - what will be the fuel for it?
innexumlover 7 months ago
Firstly, shouldn't it be SUPERsonic transport? If it's not at least Mach 5, then it's not hypersonic.
At any rate, it looks fantastic; like a civilian Blackbird....but by 2050, the world will be a very different place -- as a concept however, it's beautiful, it's just a shame it couldn't exist now in today's world.
Shiek927 7 months ago
this music is feeling who is a contractor?
empiryzm0 8 months ago
@empiryzm0 what????? speak normal english please
MrEiriku 7 months ago
Who is a dj ? :P soundtrack :)
empiryzm0 2 months ago
EADS vs Airstream Train
Hypersonic Zero Emission Transportation is possible only using Airstreasm Train technology:
zeroemissiontranspotrtation.webs.com
Why does EADS waste Taxpayers money — and yes it is YOUR money that
EADS wastes — on such an unsustainable, overpriced, unreal concept?
Because Airbus wants to sell more of their aircraft.
They have to make it look as though their technology has a sustainable future.
CEO
ZET
zeroemissiontranspotrtation.webs.com
ZET666Hypersonic 8 months ago
What do you mean "drink up". I just frackin' ordered.
sdtkk44 8 months ago
it sucks, is 1000 times better the project of bwb, that is zero emission, it is a huge expensive plane like concords, they want use france people money to make a plane for rich person that are less in the society. FRANCE GOV SUCKS, instead of invest on people and to better their condition, they censor internet and spend public money for make rich people to live better and arrive more faster than poor people!!!
gnuwbdesign 8 months ago
I have discovered two more videos about ZEHST on this channel: youtube.com/user/EADStv
jvreymondon 8 months ago
hypersonic requires chaos emeralds
dapperswindler 8 months ago
Hypersonic is Mach 5-10.
Did Not Do The Research
VollyTyrannis 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You should check this channel! There are 3 more videos of the ZEHST! (normal+extended+interview)-> youtube.com/user/EADStv
jvreymondon 8 months ago
Man, that a/c seems like it's gona use more fuel than a B744 :|
dedeyun 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EADS SUCKS COCK LIKE A PRO
EADS GIVES GREAT HEAD
EADS IS HUNG LIKE A HORSE
EADS HAS A BIG MUSHROOM HEAD
avnxs 8 months ago
can someone please make a plane with bigger windows!?
vegemitosis 8 months ago 2
this looks rubbish.
MikePhilbin 8 months ago
Airplanes that only exist in computers can do anything. including fly at Mach4 on nothing but seaweed. In my computer, my bicycle can circle the world in 3 hours without even pedalling.
Seriously though, the SR-71 got so hot at Mach3 it took hours to cool down after landing. Whats this new plane going to be built of that outperforms titanium alloys and does not get hot?
3 seaweed engines successfully combined into one airplane?
EADS designers are smoking something, and it ain't seaweed!
femanvate 8 months ago 3
@femanvate I think they would have figured that out if they would show the design at an airshow. There are things that can withstand higher temperatures than titanium alloys, such as the Space Shuttle's TPS. The SR-71 did not get that hot compared to the Space Shuttle, only about 300 °C. The X-15 rocket plane once achieved a speed of mach 6—it suffered damage but survived. The degree to which it will heat up depends partly on the altitude. It can be reduced with an active cooling system
S00perspud 1 month ago
such as that used in the nozzles of the space shuttle's main engines. Their exhaust was hot enough to melt them, but they were kept cool by fuel pumped through tubes in their walls.
After landing, the SR-71 could not be approached, because it was hotter than the inside of an oven, 300 °C (572 °F). If the ZEHST is built, it may need to be cooled at least around the door area before you can get out.
The temperature it reaches may also depend on the altitude. Lower pressure=less friction
S00perspud 1 month ago
@AlidiaGeorgen right before i read this, i leaned on my fucking left elbow, wtf
gawbagecan 8 months ago
Bio-fuel is still a hydro-carbon fuel. It dumps just as much carbon in the atmosphere as fossil fuel. Burning bio-fuel is NOT considered zero emissions.
MrGAPerry 8 months ago
First plane made would be so flawed it would explode and kill every passenger. make a fucking car first than can run on hydrogen. One is not enough (the Honda clarity)
snoopdiego9 8 months ago
Mach 4= 2880 mph
dustinmls 8 months ago
God damn people are stupid, hydrogen by itself is highly flammable, same with oxygen thust creating an explosion, explosion = thrust, thrust = momentum and when you mix hydrogen and oxygen gases together you get water vapor, hence zero emission
AjaxpuffNstuff 8 months ago
@AjaxpuffNstuff its not zero emmisson like you said it emits water as a by product of the hydrogen oxygen reaction. Same thing happens with space shuttles when they take off they will create a large rain cloud.
highflyer4 8 months ago
Click on my name and I will destroy all of the gay annoying adds Youtube needs tostop these freaking spammers
hockey321smash 8 months ago
the graph at 1:00 and the steap climb on the plane dont match..comon video editors do it better.
Phulesmith 8 months ago
Is this fuel efficient? because the less time to destination isnt worth 10x the amount of exaust and co2
xBrian6 8 months ago
@xBrian6 What part of hydrogen and oxygen is carbon? The amount of exhaust is irrelevant; it's >what is in< the exhaust that is significant.
hatecrew777 8 months ago
wishful thinking if they think running on h2o will achieve that speed
myfeeling4you 8 months ago
The concord is back :)
KILLAHgreenmonkey 8 months ago
@AlidiaGeorgen holy shit I was learning on my left elbow on my desk!! How the fk did you know? <3
iiSocrates 8 months ago
no thank you ill stick to peanuts and free beverages
gloabaldeejay1107 8 months ago
3c403c l300g67 020624 a4043 xnsjm
wangxhmxe 8 months ago
only 5 grand a ticket
CoBRA0245 8 months ago
Sound quality is shit... just like the stuff all the spammers on YouTube keep advertising in the comments.
THAREALDAN 8 months ago
paris to tokyo in 2.5 hrs WTH!
ilovestuff792 8 months ago
2050 fucking hell!!!
rumbleforce2 8 months ago
12t u38u 465sc8a 731881
arevalocnmfn 8 months ago
2 hours to japan.... shizzle my nizzle
HayzallNut 8 months ago
i dont like the Ipad in the video.
NewGuyCommentary 8 months ago
I had to listen twice but yeah he said ZERO emissions, how is this possible?
Bocbo 8 months ago
What's the speed at Mach 4?
EPTXgamer 8 months ago
@EPTXgamer Mach 4 is 3073.2 mph at standard conditions at sea level.
m0n3yman13 8 months ago
@EPTXgamer 4000 +
scubadivernija 8 months ago
@thelovehasbeengiven amen to that! But now days on YouTube, the majority of people are atheist !!! I'm going to sub u
nasrsarian 8 months ago
@legsi104
They just said in the video that it would be 0 emissions, in other words, no gas.
OriginOfDarkness 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The love has been given John 3:16 " For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life."
The love has been given, don't let it pass you, love is patient, it is waiting for you, God is waiting.
TheLoveHasBeenGiven 8 months ago
There is no way this will happen in the near future. We have a problem with fat people on airplanes now, imagine them at mach 4. Everyone would die.
Sabored 8 months ago
And this will be how environmentally friendly fuel-wise?
legsi104 8 months ago
@whatsgoingonthen plus no one liked the concord breaking the sound barrier every where. the zehst flys to high for that to be a problem though
knivesron 8 months ago
Zero emission huh? Those turbojets, rockets, and ramjets run on tears or dreams?
Born2Snoboard10 8 months ago 21
@Born2Snoboard10 No, probably Hyrdogen...
jsullivan05 8 months ago
@Born2Snoboard10 hydrogen and oxygen i think, turns into rain. just like the space shuttles use. at least i think
knivesron 8 months ago
@Born2Snoboard10
The rocket engines, powered by hydrogen and oxygen whose only exhaust is water vapour.
azraelbum 8 months ago 2
@Born2Snoboard10 Tears is pretty close, actually. Probably a lot less ions though lol. However, my knee-jerk reaction is also one of skepticism with regards to hydrogen-powered turbojets, and such pissy ones too, considering you would have to accelerate a massive amount of liquid-fuel bulk to takeoff speed with similarly pissy little wings providing very little lift at low speed.
hatecrew777 8 months ago
@Born2Snoboard10 Seaweed
tr0n001 8 months ago
@Born2Snoboard10 seaweed, actually
aberrantdecoder 8 months ago
@Born2Snoboard10 Rather, Biofuel
Raleighmayne 8 months ago
@Born2Snoboard10 seaweed actually :) not joking :D
MagicAndYuGiOhDude 8 months ago
@Born2Snoboard10 They run on hydrogen and oxygen. Hydrogen + Oxygen = Water. Are you afraid of too much water being emitted into the atmosphere?
pyro637 8 months ago 4
@Born2Snoboard10 every thing is posible for a grate humans mind ;)
thewolf461834 8 months ago
@Born2Snoboard10
Yo ass jockey, how about some research before being a smartass, you must be from California, fucking tree huger. Being one you should already know that hydrogen and oxygen pollute so so much.
SmiljanTT 8 months ago 2
Comment removed
sdtkk44 8 months ago
@Born2Snoboard10 It's called science. Hydrogen and Oxygen biofuels emit H2O.
sdtkk44 8 months ago
@Born2Snoboard10 seaweed. They run on seaweed.
allieXwa113 8 months ago
@Born2Snoboard10 or hydrogen ...
XTwina 7 months ago
@Born2Snoboard10 The Rockets run on hydrogen and oxygen which it doesn't take a genius to work out make.... you guessed it water! O yeah and it uses biofuel to take off.
airbriggsy 7 months ago
Because concorde was so successful?
EstyVids 8 months ago
why would i fly on this when i can get on my flying car
oakcliff621 8 months ago 2
@oakcliff621 oh wait...
Sabored 8 months ago
so much fantasy out there
zilzaal1 8 months ago
we have the technology sat there in front of us why wait fucking 40 years to build it fucking bullshit if you ask me
MrMushroom90 8 months ago
So - how much gas would this eat up? By the time this is developed, will there even be oil left?
cjap2011 8 months ago
Well ... Airbus say they will have passenger jets with see through cabins by the year 2050... if thats the best they can do in 40 odd years of development then this Zehst must be 3 maybe 400 years of production... gay why even bother releasing this =/
jussay 8 months ago
have it drive paris from japan in 30 min and ill be impressed...
TheSundayDelight 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Whats happening guys, check out my channel if your into halo reach
BetrayalOfTheWeek 8 months ago
How is it a Zero emission vehicle when burning bio-fuels releases emissions? How fast would it fall apart if one of those widely spaced engines died and cause the plane to yaw at Mach 4?
MrGAPerry 8 months ago
@MrGAPerry the "zero emission' thing comes from the hydrogen based fuel cells for the boosters and ramjets - the turbojets that do require biofuel, for take off as well as the small amount their used for landing as well, are just a small fraction of the total flight; the turbo jets are not even used to accelerate the plane beyond mach 0.8. As far as a catastrophic event at mach 4.... well... the plane would still make it to London, at least pieces of it.
LithiumLogos 8 months ago
Does it come with an ashtray an cup holders?
coleone2000 8 months ago 12
what about the mothefuckin G forces?
AKALBO47 8 months ago
@AKALBO47 Anti-sneeze medicine will prevent G-Force incidents.
MrGAPerry 8 months ago
@MrGAPerry how exactly?
AKALBO47 8 months ago
so...we will still have cramped seats...nothing new about this.
lanious2 8 months ago
are they sure that they wanna start in Tokoy?
DavidMavid94 8 months ago
zero emission when it has 2 turbojets, 3 rocket engines and 2 ramjets...
i'm sorry this is not going to happen
have fun trying to break the laws of physics :)
shirnia 8 months ago
@shirnia will use biofuel from algea :)
AKALBO47 8 months ago
Looks likes a rip off of the Blackbird and NASA's concept of a ramjet plane. Anyone can make a concept and say what it will do. There's a reason why the Concord failed and it only flies 2x the speed of sound.
keenkennyny 8 months ago
Comment removed
DeathtoRaiden1 8 months ago
Yeah and how does it fly?
DariusTabatabay 8 months ago
meanwhile in Japan, gundams are being built.
Quy4life 8 months ago
hola como esta
wwqfwqfqwfqwfdwdwqefwefwef
diabolok023 8 months ago
hola como esta
wwqfwqfqwfqwfd
diabolok023 8 months ago
hola como esta
diabolok023 8 months ago
Cruise altitude of 32,000m (105,000ft) corresponds to time of useful consciousness of less than 9 seconds.
So this animation depicting passengers wearing regular business suits looking out of standard sized airliner windows is not very likely. But requiring passengers to wear pressure suits sounds so dangerous...
As usual, the issue is more about market acceptance than about technology.
Xisla 8 months ago
the French will have one and ruin it for us all again :-)
thomasdallaway 8 months ago
Tokyo to London in less than 17 minutes? the video is not very clear.
jmlakes 8 months ago
And will cost 50000usd....
Herimia 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out the official crown court papers that lead to my "5 year rap & poetry ban" (video on my page)
"Donhonki" "First ever crown court BANNED uk rap-poet" (2009-2014)
#SuperInjunction
donhonki1 8 months ago
WOW YOU GUYS ARE SO SMART IT ONLY TOOK 50 YEAR TO SOME overpaid JACKASS HAVE THE IDEA OF USING A Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird IN TO COMERCIAL FLIGHT.
grando111 8 months ago
It's practically the same design as the black bird. Obviously it's going to go fast. They practically took an army air craft and made it into a plane
recentdan123 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@recentdan123
Really? Looks NOTHING like the SR-71. That's like saying an F-16 looks like a SU-35, because they both have wings and a cockpit.
DeathtoRaiden1 8 months ago
Pfft this is nothing i got a razor that does mach 6.
dazhibernian 8 months ago
It's a freakin' SR-71!
PetraAnimations 8 months ago
@PetraAnimations CoD fanboy gtfo, they're out of commission and are almost 40 years old
oTheGriMReaPeR 8 months ago
To all those saying this is old bla bla.
The Problem is not to built such an airplane, even one with mach 10 could be built.
But having one that flies to a reliable price for the passenger is.Taking in account all the money for invention and the fact that these jets never get produced in large numbers like an Airbus A330 or Boing 747.
Why you think ONE B2 Bomber is worth $2.87 billion?
k1dicarus 8 months ago
looks like a modified SR-71 black bird nothing new
auriga9999 8 months ago
@auriga9999 Except this plane actually carries passengers.
iLecter 8 months ago
@auriga9999 Except that blackbird was leaking highly posionous fuel while on the ground. This one will not.
krbosak 8 months ago
This is nothing- check out the video animation of my new air/spacecraft that can fly to Mars and back in under 24 hours.
I'm currently on the hunt for investors, so don't miss out on this golden opportunity!
SuperTruth77 8 months ago 2
@SuperTruth77 Hopefully your investors check out your other posts jackass.. Like the one where you claim to father a child with a deployed soldiers wife. Good luck with your funding there skippy
bear76009 5 months ago
wonder how much it's going to be?
allenthefury 8 months ago
Basically it's a concorde 2, But smaller and a extra rudder...
lewlew12345 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lewlew12345 "Basically it's a concorde 2, But smaller and a extra rudder..."
basically, a car is a motorbike, only doubled.
krbosak 8 months ago
mkxb8np 6gw1eb pg8g kb74
burtyiht 8 months ago
Well isn't this like Concord all over again?
Concord was really really noisy that was the main issue did they eliminate the sonic bang or something?
graffitiphat 8 months ago
@graffitiphat the concord was old, simple as that. not efficient and expensive to maintain. and playnes like that go super sonic many miles downrange and on altitude from the airport.
k1dicarus 8 months ago
8 minutes tokyo to london thats faster than concorde
CastleSnowflake 8 months ago
We already have Jet's that go mach 4.. I don't understand why it hasn't gone commercial yet.. We've had the technology forever... Oh wait.. Capitalism - thats' why! =]
razryan 8 months ago
meh..
JoshSnipez 8 months ago
a little explanation would be appreciated
judoisoww 8 months ago 37
@judoisoww Zehst would use three different propulsion systems. The aircraft would take off powered by two turbofans and undertake a steep climb reaching around Mach 0.8 at which point two rocket boosters would kick in to propel the vehicle to Mach 2.5 at which point two underwing ramjets would kick in to reach speeds above Mach 4. Cruising altitude would be just above the atmosphere. The aircraft would glide during decent, with the turbofans powering up again in the final stage of flight.
BuGBurnout 8 months ago
I can make an animation of a zero emissions plane as well.
Doesn't make it possible...
mckseal 8 months ago
it looks abit like the Aurora that never happened... you know, the one that didnt even have any pictures?
DarkstarNovembr 8 months ago
homosexual and missleading
lewisisdaman 8 months ago
I wouldn't want to fly in a plane that keeps going transparent like that...
Sanderr90 8 months ago 2
@Sanderr90 Well, Airbus has plans of a plane being transparent, it's crazy
KenanVideos 8 months ago
well i doubt this will every fly to australia so fuck my life.
NextGenRev 8 months ago 4
For a company that can supposedly make a plane that goes at 4x the speed of sound, they sure make real shitty animations
SgtTwinkleToes 8 months ago 96
@SgtTwinkleToes i was your first like.
cota47 8 months ago
@SgtTwinkleToes
more time to engage in developing the efficiency/speed and safety.
KingOfPie 8 months ago
@SgtTwinkleToes they spent all thje money on the plane :)
docterdroob 8 months ago
Come on! It's 2011! The NEW Mach 4, was yesterday's Mach 10... use SCRAM JETS!
doceigen 8 months ago
@doceigen
Hydrocarbon scramjet can go Mach6+, Hydrogen scramjet can go even faster theoratically, Mach10+, even to space when coupled with rocket engine
However the development of scramjet is still full of difficulties. Les than a week ago the second X-51A Waverider failed
RNAinterference 8 months ago
fake and gay
tripedoutunicorn 8 months ago
@tripedoutunicorn Are you really?
unkiemonk 8 months ago
@unkiemonk ouch that 1 cut deep never get over i might go kill myself now thanks
tripedoutunicorn 8 months ago
sr71 ready for deployment
hungryfreshfob11 8 months ago
762w s5y u26m4uj jx35g0
elyssasooy 8 months ago
Oh yes, id love to sit next to hydrogen and oxygen tanks on an airplane.
What could possibly go wrong. :D
Banez1991 8 months ago
@Banez1991 it doesn't say if the rocket engines are liquid fueled or solid fueled. if solid fueled, it wouldnt have liquid nitrogen and liquid oxygen tanks. it would make more sense to have solid fuel rockets as they are much lighter. downside: less control can't be switched off once started.. its probably as bad! i wouldnt want to get on this thing!
hmfy 8 months ago
Concord had sex with a blackbird.
TheMrSupercluster 8 months ago 7
You aint got no pancake mix!
MANGOROCKN 8 months ago
cool story bro
0512mikey 8 months ago
I'm having doubts, the maintenance and insurance would cost the company a king's, queen's ransom and Einsteins brain.
macro312 8 months ago
pretty kool... i'd stumbled onto this video...
nice video...
vangbro920 8 months ago
K, so we know planes can go fast. Cool, but whatever. We know that rick people can afford to fly in tiny jets... right, k. What *I* want to know is how the fuck do you make a zero emissions jet? That's the important part. Forget how fast it can go or how rich you'd have to be to get a ticket.
tSp289 8 months ago
@tSp289 forget a jet. show me how to make a zero emissions spanner.
GTR675 8 months ago
Can i please buy a ticket on this plane
ok that would be 1 million dollars
what the fuck?
SxYBicH3S 8 months ago
@SxYBicH3S Lmfao...so true.
Viruspirate 8 months ago
concept..but will it come out??!!!??? That is the question I wanna know!!
slikazn 8 months ago
hmmm all white people riding a black airliner....
byrn3x 8 months ago
Does the still detect me if i have ghost pro?
julzk23 8 months ago
a commercial SR 71, awesome :D
tokman20 8 months ago
is there a chance the track would bend?
jack911996 8 months ago
I'm still waiting for my hover car!!
rottenappleization 8 months ago
white are all the people white
rhysyboy299 8 months ago
im sorry but the interior looks pretty shitty just like a Delta airlines plane, PTV's really? at least make it futuristic and add some PC tablets or ipads! it will be better if the windows would be bigger too it will create less fatigue!
MadridHopper005 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MadridHopper005 they need to save money somewhere.
Choo69 8 months ago
@MadridHopper005
well considering its just a simulator and not the final product, Im sure the interior isnt the first thing they are worried about, creating the commercial plane/engine to go that fast would be their first priority.
DeHarlsta 8 months ago
@0:44 Passenger: "Oh, this is my stop...lets see, push this button... and the plane lands"... brilliant
joshpit2003 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Concorde...
onlyonetigger 8 months ago
Comment removed
onlyonetigger 8 months ago
@onlyonetigger but with rockets! so its better! and somehow.. zero emissions... <_<
girass 8 months ago