@StillersFan33 woah. you do NOT put cookey in the same group as carcillo and avery. avery is a fucking annoying fagstick and carcillo is a crybaby bitch. cookey just plays a physical type of hockey, he is on a completely different level.
I'm hoping that Niedermayer is trying to bring back some respect to the game. He is not a fighter - but trying to send a message to Cooke regarding the dirty hit on Bergeron. Keep Campbell and Betman locked up - let the players police the game. Rocket, Gordie, and Shack didn't need to go scrutinizing the rule book for justice.
lol ik he's not a fighter but did niedermayer even make a fist? It was kinda funny b/c it looked like he was like ok i grabbed u, o wait no ahhh stop it, ok it's over (smiles b/c he didn't take a shot in the mug)
modano - I agree. it was a legal check. happens just about every game. every once in a while someone gets really hurt. when the rule changes I don't think you'll see Cooke go out of his way to make a hit to the head.
I laugh at all you Cooke fanboi's. Take a look at some of the injuries he has caused in the years since his days in Vancouver. What are most of them caused by? Deliberate knee on knee hits, elbows and checks to the head etc.
All of you dipshits sticking up for Cooke need to rethink the person you are standing alongside.
@aerosolchef agreed! they're all a bunch of fair weather pens fans that don't know shit about hockey, they just hopped on that bandwagon that came rollin through shitsburgh
o come on quit complainin by the time pitt plays boston eric godard will be back and chara will get rocked simple as that..... every team has some one who resembles matt cooke so quit hatin
Cook iis the last guy who should get pissed about taking a shot to the head. I just hope the bruins take care of him this thursday. Cooks a piece of shit.
Technically when cooke hit savard it was a clean hit. You look me up one rule that wasn't in the rulebook when it happened if it was an illegal hit you bastards.
Common sense or not, the league disagrees with you. As a Pens fan, I didn't like the hit either and even though I like the majority of the plays and hits Cooke makes, those are ones I can do without. Even though I expected there to be a suspension (especially since it was Cooke), it was fair since Richards wasn't suspended either. I am glad there will be a rule on the books to stop hits like those next season though. No need to call someone a moron when they are just stating a fact.
lol, just rewatched the Cooke/Savard hit and the contact happens ABOVE THE NUMBER ON COOKE'S SHOULDER! That means that it wasn't even upper arm, it was a COMPLETE SHOULDER CHECK. Anyone who thinks it was an elbow needs to just stick to figure skating. Keep your head up next time Savard. Watch that play and Savard doesn't look up once, only at the puck on the ice, just asking for trouble.
these trolls don't know hockey so don't even waste your breathe. it's blatantly obvious it was shoulder to head and no elbow was involved and cooke never left his feet. its not his fault marc savard is the size of a pre pubescent teenage boy. i mean he is 5'8'' maybe 175 pounds soaking wet, coming through the middle of the ice with his head down. what did he expect was going to happen?
It was a dirty hit, coming in from a sideways angle
it doesn't matter if it's not illegal, it's still dirty. The rules of the game are changing due to these types of hits, if anything changes for the worse than the players will only have hits like Cooke's and Richard's to blame.
than stop watching hockey. if you dont like the rules and how the players play than just stop watching. go watch basketball or baseball. its a extremely face paced game, and matt cooke is 6'1" and marc savard is 5'8", what is he supposed to do going 15+ mph. is he suppose to calculate the size of an opponent and that calculate where his shoulder is going to hit that person on their body? I mean come on.
what right do you have to tell me to stop watching hockey? you obviously have no idea what is supposed to be the correct way of playing.
yes hockey is a physical sport, with fighting, hitting. But like I said, an illegal hit should not be just limited to elbow-head shots, skates leaving the ice, etc. The gms have all agreed that this is a rule that should be changed.
If you don't agree then you should stop watching hockey, since you're basically disagree with the NHL and it's GMs.
i agree that the NHL should do what they feel is necessary to protect their products they put on the ice, but THIS YEAR IT'S NOT AGAINST THE RULES. i dont give a shit about what rule may or may not be passed 7 months from now. bottom line is he mad a perfectly legal hockey play in the 09-10 nhl season. other than that go cry to someone else about how you think the game is too rough. I bet your mom wont let you play anything other than flag football huh?
alright buddy, just so you know I've played hockey so you can stfu about me being a wuss.
if you want to get the convo dirtied up I'm all up for it
you're just a ignorant son of a bitch who can't keep a clean arguement going, and has to resort to trash talking about moms, LOL.
Yes it's not against the rule this year, but there is a reason why people see it as dirty, get used to it. You should be the one crying cause your nhl is changing and you can't coop with it.
whether a player admits it or not, every time they check another player they do it with the intention of causing enough pain so that player is too intimidated to play his game. they dont hit each other with the idea of trolls like you whining about how the game is too rough. the are trying to scare an opponent into not wanting to compete against them. sometimes when you are as small as savard you get hurt.
the cooke hit is no comparison to the richards hit. if savard wasnt the size of a teenager and that was a normal sized player it would have been a perfectly "clean" shoulder to shoulder hit. considering cooke is already taller than savard and savard was skating with his head down not even looking up ice he went for the hit and got his head. nothing he can do except not hit him, but this is hockey not soccer. richards jumped with his elbow into a much taller player. no comparison.
yes if I had to say, the Cooke hit was more "legal" out of the two, however that doesn't change the fact that he took a big hit going from the player's blind spot in.
and unless I'm mistaken , this was after the GM meeting, so obviously this is getting a lot of attention.
No, the Cooke hit was a couple days before the GM meeting. And I think everyone, even Pens fans, were extremely surprised that there was no suspension (including those that didn't think the hit was dirty). I think the fact that they DIDN'T suspend someone like Cooke for that hit should tell everyone that the league feels 100% that the hit was legal according to the NHL rulebook.
Yeah I wasn't sure if it was before or after the gm meeting, but all I knew was that it was right around the same time.
With these kinds of hits, nothing is going to come out of it except injuries and suspension. The fact that Cooke was not suspended for the hit really set a bad tone for the rest of the NHL. I think Recchi accusing the league of dropping the ball was correct; they really messed this one up.
Well ever since Cooke left the Canucks, I stopped rooting for him.
No, what really set the tone this year was them not suspending Richards for his knockout blow to Booth back in October. That is the sole reason Cooke was not suspended, believe me. And I have to agree with the league here...they did the right thing by not contradicting themselves. I mean, he's certainly not the kind of player that is going to get a break from the league, so they must have had very good reason to not suspend him, know what I mean?
Well they both should have been suspended in the first place, I can see why the league chose not to after comparing to the Richard's hit. What I meant was with these kinds of hits, you're walking a thin line between legal and illegal (And possibly being suspended). You're basically putting yourself on the spot for the media to discuss about your controversial hit, and nothing good will come out of it.
you are extremely mistaken you idiot, quit replying because you obviously don't know what you're talking about. The hit happened on March 7th, the GM meetings were March 8th to 10th. Therefore at the time of the hit, it was 100% legal. And it wasn't intent to injure, Savard had the puck for less than 1 tenth of a second; in less than 0.1 seconds Cooke made the decision to hit a man who was taking a shot on net. The same thing any defensively responsible player does until the rule change.
keep defending him, everyone reading your comments know you're just some bandwagon who has 0 first hand experience with hockey
so you think a blind side hit to the head is legal? Even if it was, COOKE has the INTENT to injure with that kind of hit. Players are responsible for their own bodies, and therefore he should , and WOULD HAVE if the league hadn't already let the richard's hit go by.
Go get some coffee, you're obviously still half asleep
Right, no experience. I'm Canadian and I've played hockey since I was 4 years old, but I guess that's no experience. lol, and my username is named after a future HOFer, but I guess I don't really follow hockey. Seeing as how you told me to go do my homework, when it was you who didn't really understand the timeline pretty much demonstrates that you are a failure who didn't really get the situation. I could really care less what "most people" think. Most people are morons; case in point: you
Intent to stop a scoring chance, at the time of the hit you were allowed to aim for a man's head as long as he was playing the puck and you didn't do it with an elbow, charge, etc. I'm not saying that they shouldn't make it a penalty, but at the time it was a legal hit (I won't call it clean, but it was legal; there's a difference, and SI had a good article about it.
see that's the problem THE NHL is trying to eliminate these side hits even if it's not ELBOW to the head or whatever.
Headshots are just lethal and someone can get seriously hurt, hockey is not about injuring players. If you had done any homework on the gm meeting whatsoever you would have known that it was unanimously ruled to get rid off.
Yeah, and I agree with them, but the hit happened before the GM meetings, so there was no rule against head shots when the hit happened, so Cooke didn't break any rules that were in place. If you did any homework you would know that.
Looking back at your other comment, you were saying this was a good hit, and that it was Savard's fault for being knocked unconscious.
There's a reason why all the players argue that Cooke should have be suspended. This is just non sportsman like to take a hit with the intend to injure another player like this.
I've done my homework thank you very much, now go do yours
doesnt matter if it was an elbow or a shoulder you douchebag. it was still a shot to the head on a defenseless player. cooke had savard's head lined up the whole time and savard never saw him coming. cooke even through his arm out to make sure he connected with the head.
hope that pussy is ready to fight tougher guys than niedermayer when he comes back.
whos fault is it for making themselves defenseless in the middle of the ice in a nhl game? stop being an idiot. these are grown men and they know how to protect themselves. savard should have been aware where everyone on the ice was instead of trying to stick handle and shoot with his head down in the middle of the ice like he was at morning practice. i know you get bullied alot in middle school and your use to the whole defenseless person argument, but come on. get real idiot
Yeah and at the time of the hit there was no rule against hitting somebody in the head with a should check, so Cooke didn't break any rules. If they want to make a headshot rule to reduce concussions (like the GMs have voted too since the hit) kudos to them, but at the time of the hit, it was a completely legal hit.
piratebri is clearly a moron. It was the upper arm area between the elbow and the shoulder. The league has said that numerous times as have many analysts who have condemned the hit. If you think it was an elbow than you should watch another sport, cuz you don't get hockey. It was a cheap shot, but he didn't break a single rule.
hahahahahahhahaha yea because the big bad bruins are so tough right. nobody is going to do shit. the bruins are the softest team in the nhl. they arent going to do anything. get out of your boston dream world where you white trash think you are tough because 'The Departed' was filmed there. you are a joke just like that shitbag team who hasnt won shit in over 30 years. they didn't anything when it happened i dont know what makes you think that will change in a week. you idiot
When Cooke was on the Canucks he was a great player, never dirty, now he's a giant douche bag :O but maybe I'm only looking out the window when it's scenic..
Hate to rain on the parade, but there's absolutely no way Cooke is going to scrap anyone against the Bruins.
He's a no-good dirty fuck, and he'll do everything in his power to stay away from Lucic, Chara, Thornton, basically anyone that comes near him, he'll wet himself and go off on a line change.
Never will he answer the bell when it's time, he'll always find a way to wriggle his slimy, pansy-ass self out of it.
Can't stand that type of player. There's no place for him.
i bet he will be a healthy scratch that game. he will have a target on his jersey though and hopefully if no one fights him, then at least he gets drilled into the boards or in open ice.
@SunnyDB1TCH How about that's not the point retard. I sure as hell dont give a shit about the Bruins, nor Chara. But when they do play the Bruins this week, Chara (being the size he is) could teach that asshole a lesson or two.
if you want to watch penguins highlights and especially watch the highlights of this game clik my channel i am going to have all pittsburgh games and videos of teams and more
march 18 =]...lol to bad im a flyers and we just saw the bruins a few nights ago and they whooped on us lol...def waitin for the next pens sabres games tho haha cooke really is a little bitch...
0:33 clean hit
gfsfg111 4 months ago
Hey, random thought here but to anyone whos a fan of WWE the music that was on during their little fight here was Steve Austins theme...
Omega1867 9 months ago
Matt Cooke is so cool man!
a7x1234568 9 months ago
"well i have not seen robbie niedermayer fight..."
*cooke takedown*
"...and maybe he doesn't fight much."
DevilsFreak17 9 months ago 3
lamme waste of time
sambudwiser 10 months ago
I hate both
sublime3784 10 months ago
fail
MyPanther4 11 months ago
Comment removed
lilkurdishprincess 11 months ago
Yeah Matt Cooke sure beat the shyt out of Rob's shoulder....not a single connect.
irishdemon9 11 months ago
chico- i have never seen robbie niedermayer fight before
*takedown*
chico-... i guess he doesnt fight much
mariobaseball808 1 year ago
Comment removed
lilkurdishprincess 11 months ago
Leave it to Cooke to fight non fighters. BITCH
Jackington25 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i was at this game
dgd151 1 year ago
Comment removed
dgd151 1 year ago
matt cooke, sean avery, daniel carcillo...all disgraces to the league. there are others too, don't get me wrong.
StillersFan33 1 year ago
@StillersFan33 woah. you do NOT put cookey in the same group as carcillo and avery. avery is a fucking annoying fagstick and carcillo is a crybaby bitch. cookey just plays a physical type of hockey, he is on a completely different level.
icejames14 1 year ago
@icejames14 minus the cheap shots, yeah.
StillersFan33 1 year ago
@icejames14 Tell that to Savard, Lecalvilier, and Cole.
SolidSnake09999 1 year ago
@icejames14 You're an idiot
Jackington25 1 year ago
@icejames14 You're an idiot. He plays dirty then wound stand up and fight when hes being held accountable.
Jackington25 1 year ago
@Jackington25 umm...... what?
icejames14 1 year ago
"and maybe he doesnt fight much." hahahahaha
joshtass123 1 year ago
i was at this game. as soon as we realized it was niedermayer fighting we were like wtf lol
skoalpeach33 1 year ago
Cooke is a fucking pussy and needs to grow up
flyleaf9112 1 year ago
Don't forget half the flyers team to the list of scum of the NHL
NeckXface69 1 year ago
terrific commentating by the great chico resch
njdevils17 1 year ago
add hartnell to list. dirty mullet-headed fuck
lightning101196x 1 year ago 16
@lightning101196x hartnell is dirty but at least he can contribute to scoring unlike avery and cooke
INXNITYZ3 1 year ago
@lightning101196x Same here...I'm a flyrs fan and I ca'nt stand him.
Very talented though...
valiante1966 1 year ago
YEA BOBBY NIEDERMAYER who cares if he got fucked up cooke got knocked out by a fucking 18 year old
AnaheimDucks39 1 year ago
@AnaheimDucks39 .....robby
MrFCHDX 1 year ago
Add Carcillo to that list
TDFC09 1 year ago
I am a huge Penguins fan, Matt Cooke is one of my favorites because he don't care about anybody, if u hit him he is going to hit u back.
tyler3910 1 year ago 2
@tyler3910 Yea he just wont do it cleanly
patio12345 1 year ago
I'm hoping that Niedermayer is trying to bring back some respect to the game. He is not a fighter - but trying to send a message to Cooke regarding the dirty hit on Bergeron. Keep Campbell and Betman locked up - let the players police the game. Rocket, Gordie, and Shack didn't need to go scrutinizing the rule book for justice.
kparker5824 1 year ago
Cookes A FUCKING PUSSY HE GOT SLAUGHTERED BY SHAWN THORNTON AND THORNTON WAS GOIN EASY COOKES A PUSSY SUCKS HIS MOTHERS STRAP ON FOR MONEY
metalmeltdown452 1 year ago
cooke manned up. great guy, always helping out in pittsburgh
iamsirpat 2 years ago
hes a scumb bag
BcPaTs255 1 year ago
you're one to talk
iamsirpat 1 year ago
A feature length film made for under $5000
The Greatest Movie Of All Time!
Check out my youtube channel, for several trailers :)
humanwarnings 2 years ago
they all look like fuggin retards fighting in skates...haha priceless
TrustKovacss 2 years ago
its a fuggin hockey fight, what else would they wear, go play some badminton or whatever sport you like
gleeson638 2 years ago
@TrustKovacss
How?
mkailov13 1 year ago
Cooke been sucking dick since he was born. Goofy lookin faggot.
sukkkmyballs 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Need an invite to Lockerz for free stuff??? Check out my video! PM me your email and I'll send you an invite!
IndividuallyWrapped 2 years ago
FTW STONE COLD STEVE AUSTIN
nanotech2006 2 years ago
ouch rob got his @ss handed to him lol and i agree with couter
7oxicKyle96 2 years ago
lol ik he's not a fighter but did niedermayer even make a fist? It was kinda funny b/c it looked like he was like ok i grabbed u, o wait no ahhh stop it, ok it's over (smiles b/c he didn't take a shot in the mug)
cobrafan427 2 years ago
How I wish Rob would have nailed him some good ones! :(
stevenaudet 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Be honest
If u really like someone right now,
or miss them right at this moment,
or can't get them out of your head,
Then copy and paste this on 10 vvids within 5 minutes,
And whoever you are missing,
Will surprise you tomorow
VMvikingsfootball 2 years ago
Cookie wins that one, as rob goes for girlie face scratch/grab,, try Punching next time thats how you fight,, !!!
bobphatbhat 2 years ago
Cooke won
bruinsfan33 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
cooke is a champ
wreckage101 2 years ago
Cooke and Avery are the scum of the NHL.
couter2000 2 years ago 32
@couter2000 agree 100% both are scum
thebellendsFTW 2 years ago
@couter2000 Jarkko Ruutu something?
etnies4ilves 1 year ago
@couter2000 , yeah, but Sean Avery is entertaining as hell....he's like watching Slapshot.
ffairlane57 1 year ago
@couter2000 you have to admit though, both of them are good fighters... and thats what hockey is all about sometimes.
Michaelmantwentyfive 1 year ago
@couter2000 no just avery ... idiot
MisterBeastMode 11 months ago
@couter2000 and Chris Simon
blueoctober6 10 months ago
modano - I agree. it was a legal check. happens just about every game. every once in a while someone gets really hurt. when the rule changes I don't think you'll see Cooke go out of his way to make a hit to the head.
How come when Stevens hit like this it was okay?
grnmle79 2 years ago
Cooke looked great wearing that elbow.
peternincumpoop 2 years ago
Rob hit cooke with an elbow? Note to Rob, hit him harder with that elbow next time eh?
thinkingjack 2 years ago
I bet Cooke wishes that everyone he hit didn't have helmets
SSt4rr 2 years ago
I laugh at all you Cooke fanboi's. Take a look at some of the injuries he has caused in the years since his days in Vancouver. What are most of them caused by? Deliberate knee on knee hits, elbows and checks to the head etc.
All of you dipshits sticking up for Cooke need to rethink the person you are standing alongside.
Cooke is a fucking pussy, plain and simply put.
I once again laugh at all you Cooke fanboi's...
aerosolchef 2 years ago
@aerosolchef agreed! they're all a bunch of fair weather pens fans that don't know shit about hockey, they just hopped on that bandwagon that came rollin through shitsburgh
intoodeep941 2 years ago
Comment removed
aerosolchef 2 years ago
fuck cooke...hes gonna get messed up at boston next week
trrippyy 2 years ago 3
@trrippyy he gottt fuckeddd up too hahaha u called it budd i watched it happne
Nycetrees 1 year ago
o come on quit complainin by the time pitt plays boston eric godard will be back and chara will get rocked simple as that..... every team has some one who resembles matt cooke so quit hatin
ndbontempo12 2 years ago
@ndbontempo12 lol no. chara doesnt fight, he wrestles. when hes not afraid.
sgtderk1 2 years ago
Comment removed
ndbontempo12 2 years ago
Cook iis the last guy who should get pissed about taking a shot to the head. I just hope the bruins take care of him this thursday. Cooks a piece of shit.
rivulcanman 2 years ago 2
@rivulcanman hahahaha cooke dropped his ass. The bruins didnt do shit. They ddint send any message and they lost 3-0. Great works bruins.
millzee53 1 year ago
@millzee53 did you listen to the announcer? cooke picked someone who never fights to fight lmfao whats that say about him?
Jawz4devils 1 year ago
@Jawz4devils Because at the end of the period Niedermayer did a cheap hit on Cooke.
slot962 1 year ago
@Jawz4devils well if you never fight,maybe you shouldn't throw elbows.It's pretty simple...
bern1417 10 months ago
I wanted Niedermayer to beat the shit out of Cooke. Then I lol'd at him
QcD0g19 2 years ago 2
Technically when cooke hit savard it was a clean hit. You look me up one rule that wasn't in the rulebook when it happened if it was an illegal hit you bastards.
xdalemhartzx 2 years ago
@xdalemhartzx
You my friend are a moron
Its common fin sense you don't blindside a guy with a hit to the head. It is called having respect for the other players.
nymets6986e 2 years ago
Common sense or not, the league disagrees with you. As a Pens fan, I didn't like the hit either and even though I like the majority of the plays and hits Cooke makes, those are ones I can do without. Even though I expected there to be a suspension (especially since it was Cooke), it was fair since Richards wasn't suspended either. I am glad there will be a rule on the books to stop hits like those next season though. No need to call someone a moron when they are just stating a fact.
Sinsemilla4u 2 years ago
Matt cooke has a lot of this coming just wait.
starlightgirlrules 2 years ago
I F-ING love Matt Cooke. I love the Pens!!!
.... too bad they lost that game.... :(
NinjaMuffinsTV 2 years ago
lol, just rewatched the Cooke/Savard hit and the contact happens ABOVE THE NUMBER ON COOKE'S SHOULDER! That means that it wasn't even upper arm, it was a COMPLETE SHOULDER CHECK. Anyone who thinks it was an elbow needs to just stick to figure skating. Keep your head up next time Savard. Watch that play and Savard doesn't look up once, only at the puck on the ice, just asking for trouble.
modano190 2 years ago
@modano190
these trolls don't know hockey so don't even waste your breathe. it's blatantly obvious it was shoulder to head and no elbow was involved and cooke never left his feet. its not his fault marc savard is the size of a pre pubescent teenage boy. i mean he is 5'8'' maybe 175 pounds soaking wet, coming through the middle of the ice with his head down. what did he expect was going to happen?
sullivan0099 2 years ago
It was a dirty hit, coming in from a sideways angle
it doesn't matter if it's not illegal, it's still dirty. The rules of the game are changing due to these types of hits, if anything changes for the worse than the players will only have hits like Cooke's and Richard's to blame.
kenzzzhou 2 years ago
@kenzzzhou
than stop watching hockey. if you dont like the rules and how the players play than just stop watching. go watch basketball or baseball. its a extremely face paced game, and matt cooke is 6'1" and marc savard is 5'8", what is he supposed to do going 15+ mph. is he suppose to calculate the size of an opponent and that calculate where his shoulder is going to hit that person on their body? I mean come on.
sullivan0099 2 years ago
what right do you have to tell me to stop watching hockey? you obviously have no idea what is supposed to be the correct way of playing.
yes hockey is a physical sport, with fighting, hitting. But like I said, an illegal hit should not be just limited to elbow-head shots, skates leaving the ice, etc. The gms have all agreed that this is a rule that should be changed.
If you don't agree then you should stop watching hockey, since you're basically disagree with the NHL and it's GMs.
kenzzzhou 2 years ago
@kenzzzhou
i agree that the NHL should do what they feel is necessary to protect their products they put on the ice, but THIS YEAR IT'S NOT AGAINST THE RULES. i dont give a shit about what rule may or may not be passed 7 months from now. bottom line is he mad a perfectly legal hockey play in the 09-10 nhl season. other than that go cry to someone else about how you think the game is too rough. I bet your mom wont let you play anything other than flag football huh?
sullivan0099 2 years ago
alright buddy, just so you know I've played hockey so you can stfu about me being a wuss.
if you want to get the convo dirtied up I'm all up for it
you're just a ignorant son of a bitch who can't keep a clean arguement going, and has to resort to trash talking about moms, LOL.
Yes it's not against the rule this year, but there is a reason why people see it as dirty, get used to it. You should be the one crying cause your nhl is changing and you can't coop with it.
deal with it tough guy
kenzzzhou 2 years ago
negative....that was a nothing hit.... not even CLOSE to deserving of a fight...stop bein a pussy.
seehound619 2 years ago
@kenzzzhou
whether a player admits it or not, every time they check another player they do it with the intention of causing enough pain so that player is too intimidated to play his game. they dont hit each other with the idea of trolls like you whining about how the game is too rough. the are trying to scare an opponent into not wanting to compete against them. sometimes when you are as small as savard you get hurt.
sullivan0099 2 years ago
@kenzzzhou
the cooke hit is no comparison to the richards hit. if savard wasnt the size of a teenager and that was a normal sized player it would have been a perfectly "clean" shoulder to shoulder hit. considering cooke is already taller than savard and savard was skating with his head down not even looking up ice he went for the hit and got his head. nothing he can do except not hit him, but this is hockey not soccer. richards jumped with his elbow into a much taller player. no comparison.
sullivan0099 2 years ago
same angle, same controversy
yes if I had to say, the Cooke hit was more "legal" out of the two, however that doesn't change the fact that he took a big hit going from the player's blind spot in.
and unless I'm mistaken , this was after the GM meeting, so obviously this is getting a lot of attention.
kenzzzhou 2 years ago
No, the Cooke hit was a couple days before the GM meeting. And I think everyone, even Pens fans, were extremely surprised that there was no suspension (including those that didn't think the hit was dirty). I think the fact that they DIDN'T suspend someone like Cooke for that hit should tell everyone that the league feels 100% that the hit was legal according to the NHL rulebook.
Sinsemilla4u 2 years ago
Yeah I wasn't sure if it was before or after the gm meeting, but all I knew was that it was right around the same time.
With these kinds of hits, nothing is going to come out of it except injuries and suspension. The fact that Cooke was not suspended for the hit really set a bad tone for the rest of the NHL. I think Recchi accusing the league of dropping the ball was correct; they really messed this one up.
Well ever since Cooke left the Canucks, I stopped rooting for him.
kenzzzhou 2 years ago
No, what really set the tone this year was them not suspending Richards for his knockout blow to Booth back in October. That is the sole reason Cooke was not suspended, believe me. And I have to agree with the league here...they did the right thing by not contradicting themselves. I mean, he's certainly not the kind of player that is going to get a break from the league, so they must have had very good reason to not suspend him, know what I mean?
Sinsemilla4u 2 years ago
Well they both should have been suspended in the first place, I can see why the league chose not to after comparing to the Richard's hit. What I meant was with these kinds of hits, you're walking a thin line between legal and illegal (And possibly being suspended). You're basically putting yourself on the spot for the media to discuss about your controversial hit, and nothing good will come out of it.
kenzzzhou 2 years ago
Oh I agree completely, and I'm glad the rules are being changed so that the standard of being tough on head shots will be consistent.
Sinsemilla4u 2 years ago
you are extremely mistaken you idiot, quit replying because you obviously don't know what you're talking about. The hit happened on March 7th, the GM meetings were March 8th to 10th. Therefore at the time of the hit, it was 100% legal. And it wasn't intent to injure, Savard had the puck for less than 1 tenth of a second; in less than 0.1 seconds Cooke made the decision to hit a man who was taking a shot on net. The same thing any defensively responsible player does until the rule change.
modano190 2 years ago
right
keep defending him, everyone reading your comments know you're just some bandwagon who has 0 first hand experience with hockey
so you think a blind side hit to the head is legal? Even if it was, COOKE has the INTENT to injure with that kind of hit. Players are responsible for their own bodies, and therefore he should , and WOULD HAVE if the league hadn't already let the richard's hit go by.
Go get some coffee, you're obviously still half asleep
kenzzzhou 2 years ago
Right, no experience. I'm Canadian and I've played hockey since I was 4 years old, but I guess that's no experience. lol, and my username is named after a future HOFer, but I guess I don't really follow hockey. Seeing as how you told me to go do my homework, when it was you who didn't really understand the timeline pretty much demonstrates that you are a failure who didn't really get the situation. I could really care less what "most people" think. Most people are morons; case in point: you
modano190 2 years ago
it was intent to injure how you can say aiming for a mans head isn't intent it beyond me. Cookes hits are always with intent to injure.
feanor 2 years ago
Intent to stop a scoring chance, at the time of the hit you were allowed to aim for a man's head as long as he was playing the puck and you didn't do it with an elbow, charge, etc. I'm not saying that they shouldn't make it a penalty, but at the time it was a legal hit (I won't call it clean, but it was legal; there's a difference, and SI had a good article about it.
modano190 2 years ago
@sullivan0099 Dude, Cooke is prolly like an inch taller than Savard, so cut the crap.
Rehtomflow 2 years ago
see that's the problem THE NHL is trying to eliminate these side hits even if it's not ELBOW to the head or whatever.
Headshots are just lethal and someone can get seriously hurt, hockey is not about injuring players. If you had done any homework on the gm meeting whatsoever you would have known that it was unanimously ruled to get rid off.
kenzzzhou 2 years ago
Yeah, and I agree with them, but the hit happened before the GM meetings, so there was no rule against head shots when the hit happened, so Cooke didn't break any rules that were in place. If you did any homework you would know that.
modano190 2 years ago
Yeah sure
Looking back at your other comment, you were saying this was a good hit, and that it was Savard's fault for being knocked unconscious.
There's a reason why all the players argue that Cooke should have be suspended. This is just non sportsman like to take a hit with the intend to injure another player like this.
I've done my homework thank you very much, now go do yours
kenzzzhou 2 years ago
doesnt matter if it was an elbow or a shoulder you douchebag. it was still a shot to the head on a defenseless player. cooke had savard's head lined up the whole time and savard never saw him coming. cooke even through his arm out to make sure he connected with the head.
hope that pussy is ready to fight tougher guys than niedermayer when he comes back.
magikush 2 years ago
@magikush
whos fault is it for making themselves defenseless in the middle of the ice in a nhl game? stop being an idiot. these are grown men and they know how to protect themselves. savard should have been aware where everyone on the ice was instead of trying to stick handle and shoot with his head down in the middle of the ice like he was at morning practice. i know you get bullied alot in middle school and your use to the whole defenseless person argument, but come on. get real idiot
sullivan0099 2 years ago
Yeah and at the time of the hit there was no rule against hitting somebody in the head with a should check, so Cooke didn't break any rules. If they want to make a headshot rule to reduce concussions (like the GMs have voted too since the hit) kudos to them, but at the time of the hit, it was a completely legal hit.
modano190 2 years ago
@modano190 there still isn't hey only the GMs have voted for it so far
adzbarkley 2 years ago
piratebri is clearly a moron. It was the upper arm area between the elbow and the shoulder. The league has said that numerous times as have many analysts who have condemned the hit. If you think it was an elbow than you should watch another sport, cuz you don't get hockey. It was a cheap shot, but he didn't break a single rule.
modano190 2 years ago
Matt Cooke beat Niedermayer ass
alexcbzs27 2 years ago
Ну Кук блин профессионал, разминается перед Бостоном, тяжело ему придётся
Dealasach 2 years ago
Can't wait for Cooke to be put on the long-term injury list after the Bruins game. :o)
DerekHki 2 years ago
@DerekHki
hahahahahahhahaha yea because the big bad bruins are so tough right. nobody is going to do shit. the bruins are the softest team in the nhl. they arent going to do anything. get out of your boston dream world where you white trash think you are tough because 'The Departed' was filmed there. you are a joke just like that shitbag team who hasnt won shit in over 30 years. they didn't anything when it happened i dont know what makes you think that will change in a week. you idiot
sullivan0099 2 years ago
How can an NHL player be so lousy in fighting as Nieddermayer .
LOVELIFE54 2 years ago 2
kinda surprised cooke won tbh
JerOutlaw 2 years ago
When Cooke was on the Canucks he was a great player, never dirty, now he's a giant douche bag :O but maybe I'm only looking out the window when it's scenic..
Mrgarison101RS 2 years ago
Hate to rain on the parade, but there's absolutely no way Cooke is going to scrap anyone against the Bruins.
He's a no-good dirty fuck, and he'll do everything in his power to stay away from Lucic, Chara, Thornton, basically anyone that comes near him, he'll wet himself and go off on a line change.
Never will he answer the bell when it's time, he'll always find a way to wriggle his slimy, pansy-ass self out of it.
Can't stand that type of player. There's no place for him.
Cooter4sale 2 years ago 2
i bet he will be a healthy scratch that game. he will have a target on his jersey though and hopefully if no one fights him, then at least he gets drilled into the boards or in open ice.
Mess0723 2 years ago
@Mess0723 That would be nice. For everything he gets away with, he really should be put in his place.
@hockeykyle10 Wow...just...wow.
If you actually think that, then I weep for humanity.
Cooter4sale 2 years ago
except your wrong because cooke is one of the top fighters and hitters in the league and is pretty rough.
hockeykyle10 2 years ago
What are you fucking smokin'? Cooke hardly ever fights, and when he does, he picks his spots...his opponent here is a perfect example.
brutallyunbiased 2 years ago
Someone needs to put Cooke in his place after the elbow he threw on Savard last week.
Definitely want to see Chara give him some trouble when they play the Bruins.
aerosolchef 2 years ago
Too bad it was his shoulder. Were we watching the same game? Get your facts straight
George15843 2 years ago
@George15843 Obviously you weren't watching the same game, as it was clearly his elbow that hit Savard.
piratebri 2 years ago
how about the bruins suck and chara's overrated so much and hes terrible
SunnyDB1TCH 2 years ago
Comment removed
aerosolchef 2 years ago
@SunnyDB1TCH How about that's not the point retard. I sure as hell dont give a shit about the Bruins, nor Chara. But when they do play the Bruins this week, Chara (being the size he is) could teach that asshole a lesson or two.
aerosolchef 2 years ago
chara's a pussy and cooke cheap shots are when crosby cant fight or hes standing up for someone...wtf do u even watch hockey?
SunnyDB1TCH 2 years ago
Point out to us all when Savard went after Crosby.... What about all the knee on knee hits / cheap shots before he was with the Pens?
Your comments are full of shit, and you ask the most mundane questions. Come up with something clever to say and I will respond accordingly.
aerosolchef 2 years ago
Comment removed
aerosolchef 2 years ago
if you want to watch penguins highlights and especially watch the highlights of this game clik my channel i am going to have all pittsburgh games and videos of teams and more
PenguinsHighlights 2 years ago
cooke beat him up
dudeski78 2 years ago
couple of skirt-wearing bitches
IOwnYouNowKid 2 years ago
Cooke got the muffins going pretty quick there , amazed he fought someone from north america
PocketHercules99 2 years ago
cooke cant fight for shit...but he really shoulda got his ass whooped just bcuz the dirty hit on savard....
IvIustangsvt2003 2 years ago 2
@IvIustangsvt2003 we might have to wait for the bruins to play the pens again. think cooke might have a go with lucic
hennaert 2 years ago
march 18 =]...lol to bad im a flyers and we just saw the bruins a few nights ago and they whooped on us lol...def waitin for the next pens sabres games tho haha cooke really is a little bitch...
IvIustangsvt2003 2 years ago
that's embarrassing for Rob..
toml08 2 years ago
Oh what a shame... Cooke doesn't like it when he gets elbowed in the face. Pot. Kettle Black.
No surprise he drops the gloves with a non-figher though. Next Thursday vs Boston he'll be challenging Satan all night long.
RobViper3 2 years ago 8
i hope ill be able to see it...might not broadcast in jersey =/...hopefully he gets wat he has comin to him hahah
IvIustangsvt2003 2 years ago
NHL Network is carrying it throughout Canada.
RobViper3 2 years ago
sweet..i do get nhl network..ill def check it out...thanks man
IvIustangsvt2003 2 years ago
@ RobViper3
I agree with you. I hope Lucic, Thorton, or Chara show him a lesson
litoxaznboy 2 years ago