Added: 3 years ago
From: chrysaor911
Views: 43,183
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (193)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • the image is so poor, the plane should look like a small dot in such a wide shot but you can't see it because of the law resolution. there are even videos youtube where conspiracists admit that's the reason why we don't see the plane. i wouldn't be surprised if conspiracists intentionally took out the plane out of the image.

  • Plane was behind the smoke cloud. Other angles clearly show a plane.

  • wtf, the top comments just vanished!

  • @curuba76 From this angle you should clearly be able to spot a plane hit from that trajectory, but where is it in the shot? It is an idea you may want to use your eyes for.

  • @curuba76 hin the evening news showed this footage. They show a plane but the background is faded out. Just an idea you might wanna think about.

  • Godblees

  • JASSM missile

    No planes on 911

  • There's higher quality versions of this news cast on youtube where you can clearly see the plane coming in on the right side over the water.

  • @bonchie1 you are talking about an EDITED version of this clip shown in the evening news! THIS WAS THE LIVE SHOT and NO PLANE. How stupid can people be, not seeing truth because they don´t like it??

  • @bonchie1 it has NOTHING to do with video quality!

  • @bonchie1 post the link please.

  • It was rocket not get

  • @Steelerguy6178 get a clue. The steel frame is just a skeleton. The plane went through the skin and came apart as it went through the columns. There is no conspiracy.

  • there were no jets that day. All CGI

  • Do you have the edited version? I think it would help to see the two on a split screen. I'm going to look for it right now, but you should think about making a new video with a split screen shot of the 2 versions (with & w/o the plane). It'll illustrate your theory better. Just a suggestion.

  • @ilovegnomeland - Good idea. I'll keep an eye out for it.

  • I don't know how I feel about the "no plane" theory. I totally believe it was a controlled demolition and an inside job, but so many people said that they heard and saw the plane. I don't know, I guess I'll do my own research and get back to you. It's an interesting theory though. I KNOW that they didn't use a plane on the Pentagon, so it makes it more plausible that they didn't on the WTC. Interesting...

  • I think the plane came in on the other side of this building because look at the direction of the explosion, and you probs cant see the plane cuz of smoke and the building itself, but something's wrong with this video :/ ???

  • Investigate and think critically people. i can see the plane. rewind at 16sec and watch the upper right center (between the tower and the end of the veiw) you can see an object (plane) moving twards the tower.

  • What am I missing? Or is that the point

    Is it the fact that I see no plane? :S

  • lol, this guy is probably trolling, compare to this video, the plane is on the other side of the building... that's why they couldn't see it /watch?v=XELamUnF0EU

  • people who say there wasnt a second plane are as dumb as those people who say the holocaust never happened, or that the world is flat

  • @goalie1131 i dont see a plane in this video though

  • @quez76 because the plane flew in from the other side of the wtc... idiot

  • @TylerTheT you should still see a plane though, idiot...

  • @quez76 Not unless you have x ray vision retard, when something is in the way of something how can you see through the other side?

  • @TylerTheT they say it came from the side retard, know what your talking about before you run your mouth dumbass.

  • @quez76 Your an idiot i watched the plane hit the tower, when they say they side they dont say the side your currently looking at, when the plane came in it flew in on and angle on the other side of the tower and the explosion came out from the corner and left side (of what your looking at).. you dont run your mouth.. whatre you saying anyways there was no plane???

  • @TylerTheT hahaha, other videos with the exact location show a plane coming in from the side. in this video, theres no plane, thats all im saying. as far as you calling me an idiot, thats real funny, im just stating facts.

  • @TylerTheT No jets that day, all CGI. you saw no jet. You are either lying or decieved

  • @TylerTheT yes that is what this moron is saying.

  • @Reckin007 thanks, but im not a moron. in this video, i dont see a plane

  • Comment removed

  • umm to all of you retards the plane hit on the other side of the tower and went through the building. i was fdny and worked the the debris for months. no hoax

  • @bezeedabest Us retards eh? Quite offensive. Anyhow, do explain for us "less intelligent" people how a fibreglass/aluminum plane flew through a steel structured building & pierced the outer wall?...

  • @Kilorai have you seen a plane? there kinda big if you dont know. ever picked one up? kinda heavy. about 370,000 pounds on average. tried to stop one? kinda fast. about 500 mph. not to mention a jet engine is kind of like a big explosive device and heated the infrastructure of the building which made the building crumble. i had 6 years of studies of engineering for aircrafts and worked for boeing and the government for about 20 years. planes are like a giant missile.

  • @bezeedabest A fire gets nowhere near hot enough to cause that kind of damage, even with the jet fuel. You know what does.. thermite. The same thermite they found residue of on the steel of the WTC.

  • @Kilorai to clarify i quit my job in july of 01 to join fdny (lifelong dream)

  • If you watch a better copy of this clip, you can see the plane heading in from the south. The issue is that the resolution on this clip is so low that the plane blends into the background.

  • @UK31337 I hope they paid you well for your soul. I guarantee you that all the money in the world will not take away the empty feeling you have inside. You should be aware that you have 409 days to enjoy what you believe to be reality. It's not too late to change you mind. That's all I can tell you.

  • Wait where is the 2nd plane? I didn't see it crash...

  • @RomeoSezSO

    can't be right? Government told 2 plains crashed ...

  • @rmccay88 Yeah Right.

    That stupid collection of clips and claims has been debunked by so many independent researchers that it's hardly even entertaining to watch anymore.

    I'm as suspicious of government as the next guy...But with unfiltered media/internet the way it's been the last 10 years it's impossible for something so public to be anything but accurately portrayed with so many accurate viewpoints.

    There are no pieces of evidence that *confirm* a moronic truth theory. Sorry, tools.

  • @toneeeeeee Care to point me in the direction of these millions of researchers? Actually I can guarantee you wont find anyone who can "debunk" that documentary, youll probably just result to calling me a moron..Unfiltered media..what planet are you from? Filtered media is all we get on Earth.

    Call me names all you want, I know the truth and no 4th grader with his moms AOL account can prove me wrong.

  • @Warlordx91 I didn't say anything about millions of researchers...

    The fact that, upon initial viewing, the 'movie' asserted that United 93 was shot down mid flight, only to revise their 'debunk-able facts' to later claim it probably landed somewhere, at which point the passengers were , I'm assuming here, subjected to mind control and forced to watch reruns of dancing with the stars, leads me to question the authenticity of any of the claims they make.

  • @Warlordx91

    The documentary is easy to debunk because it's very existence is spurious to begin with. It's trying to prove something by disproving something else, which is logically flawed.

    For example, If I were to claim, and probably correctly guess you were actually working for the CIA on youtube in order to create false information, thereby spreading the confusion surrounding 9/11, could you prove me wrong? Try it. Prove me wrong. I dare you.

  • @toneeeeeee Is there anything the government says that you don't believe?

  • @Daddyo930 Haha. Seriously? I'm a Libertarian. I'm about as Anti Government as you can get. Besides, you are clearly a mole. I've sniffed out dozens on youtube already. Sitting at your fucking terminal in a discreet Virginia office building...we've got you pegged buddy. jUst wait till Niburu Gets here....Oh boy...

  • @toneeeeeee HMMM.....lets see. You don't believe that the government would kill thousands of its own citizens to go to war so that private corporations can make billions, but you believe in the Tenth planet that the Sumerians pointed out but the government says does not exist. Interesting. There may be hope for you yet. You just showed me that you believe that the government is lying to you about the existence of Niburu. Very good grasshopper.

  • I know someone who had a relative on one of the AA flights. So They must be living it up, alone on some tropical island somewhere. Or maybe they Boarded a gas chamber that morning and were shipped away to dispose of the bodies.

    Or better yet, You people are fucking retarded.

  • @toneeeeeee

    Watch Loose Change and enlighten yourself

  • and on other videos you can see from the direction of the smoke that the plane came from behind the tower in this one!! I dont believe the towers could have collapsed on their own but seriously?? no planes.. reading too much into it

  • at 2:26 of this video watch?v=DoE8Uz2ia3M you can hear people watching in the crowd saying "theres another one, move back back"

  • its scary to think what else tha government has lied/lies about.

  • why wouldnt they report an incoming airplane having all different camera views up in their media center??? ANYONE?

    there was no 2nd plane .

  • @SuperHns so if there was no second plane American airlines just volunteered one of there planes to be destroyed by the government? They volunteered two of there pilots to be taken out back and killed as the cover up so it looked like it was the crash that killed them? Oh and the families of those who were killed on the plane just made those people up to get media attention? And the children of those on who were on the plane were just acting to get media attantion too? FUCKING IDIOT!!!

  • @zaczattack

    Okay sir I may be an idiot of staying open minded and forming own opinions plus I dont swallow everything Television has to show or not show us. Anyway without any respect for the people who died that day.. All of the things that happend on that day are rather strange if you ask me.

  • @SuperHns Your not an idiot for staying open minded, but an idiot for publicly stating that there was no second plane when there clearly was a second plane. Do I buy all that government bullshit? Absolutley not. I know there is a bunch of shit they don't tell and and want to keep from us. Thats why the wiki leaks guy is fucked. Because he is releasing documents that everyone should know about. However, it is very very clear the goverenment didn't plan 9/11.

  • @zaczattack official report. structural weakening due to fires.

    Fires in high rises were never brought down a steel frame high rise.

    3 of the highest secured building next to the pentagon.

    the U.S. has a defense budget 9X greater than the rest of the world combined.

    evidence of thermite found in dust of area. cant be made in a cave. (Richard Gage)

  • @SuperHns

    I mean *without any dis-respect" My apologies

  • @zaczattack google snakeplisken flight of the bumbelbees

    i dont believe the no plane but I believe that it was an inside job

  • @manoman0 Watch the better-res footage at watch?v=ncIZuICqGes, taken from nearly the same angle, and you can see the jet more clearly. Its flight path exactly matches the radar return from UA175 as tracked by Newark Liberty Airport. The radar return ends abruptly at the location of the South Tower at exactly the same time that the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory recorded the seismic waves corresponding to the plane crash. But truthers never let facts get in the way of a good story.

  • Comment removed

  • Pixelation makes it very hard to see the jet in this EXTREMELY low-res (240p) video, but it does cross the gray buildings in Staten Is. between the horizon and NY Harbor at 0:13-0:16. It crosses the horizon when the newscaster says "capabilities" and passes in front of the white buildings between "high level" and "uh". It is passing from the upper right to the lower left, directly toward WTC2. Compare to the higher-res (still only 360p) footage of watch?v=ncIZuICqGes, where it's more visible.

  • @saintstephen71 I saw it. But that can't be a jet, can it??

  • The planes on the other side of the tower, thats why you cant see it. If you did see it you would be amazed at how the amateur pilot executes a swooping decent and precision right bank to correct the trajectory. I have never seen a big plane maneuver like that before. Look for the footage of the second hit, where you can see this maneuver.

  • wtf not jet

  • Ohhh look, no jet... sort of like how the jet that "supposedly" hit is no longer in existence, and all the people that were "supposedly" on board don't seem to be anywhere to be found either. I've seen this from the exact same angle from another chopper and the plane, though small, can be seen entering from the top right of the frame. This video is either edited, or the news station needs better cameras.

  • I saw a video of this with the same angle but from the ground showing the jet come in and this one side by side.. Jet in that one.. Nothing in this one.. Same angles..

  • Quality of this video is so bad it makes me doubt...

  • This must be one of the origins of the no-planes debate, could be that the VHS source doesn't resolve the plane against the background of the river.

  • the reporters seem to be rather calm about it... she's like, "oh. a huge building is going down. it's just a regular day..."

  • There were no second plane

  • Ridiculous claims of TV fakery from Jews: watch?v=uhtjNVWZGHU

  • I must admit - although there's no plane in this footage - it would make no sense psychologically speaking, to say there was one. The graphic would be too easily spotted by pro's and then you just have a larger can of worms. Far easier to remote planes into the building, that ways there's no problem, everyone saw it and remote tech has been around since WW2. If there was no plane, they would have just said that Al-cia-da infiltrated the towers and detonated suicide bombs. Easy

  • @AdeptAlbatross

    yeah dumb idiots would actually believe that wouldnt they

  • THESE BITCHES ARE DULL AS FUCK.. THEY SHOULD BE FIRED. LAME HOES.

  • WHERE THE FUCK THE PLANE AT.?

  • I'm not even a no-plane guy per se, but that clip does sit wrong with me.

    How could a helicopter full of people miss a jumbo jet flying towards them ?

    Having a fair amount of aviation experience, I can assure you that you are aware of traffic flying anywhere nearby... especially a big jet.

  • @bushmustgo You do have experience, the bullshit kind.

  • @madisonelectronic GFY, Dick.

  • HEY GUYS LOOK

    NO PLANE

  • You posted this on April Fools Day?

  • Thats just the opposite view.

  • @soulassssns it wasnt.... in all the videos the smoke is going a certain way and you can see the plane in the angle as this

  • What sick fuck has posted this scam? The whole world watched the plane go in live and this video was clearly altered to provide some leverage to the conspiricy people. People died in this, do not twist the facts!

  • @Zhiva2007 stop watching television.

  • @Zhiva2007 The whole world did NOT see any planes hit the building from a live feed!!! That wasn't broadcast until well into the day.

  • @DarkMedievalTimes1 actually i did. I was in australia watching it live and i spotted the plane before the news reader.. i remember i was like omg another ones comming and then the reporter had a delay reaction and caught on once it had hit

  • This was not the live shot, this shot was shown 2 minutes after the "LIVE" shot which clipped the explosion and missed the shot. Funny, FOX, CNBC, and CBS did the exact "live" clip miss of the shot. All the networks that missed the shot had several live feeds shown before the strike that we never saw again. The object is pixelated and almost impossible in this version. Look at the rate of decent. ABC shows a plane at level attitude as well as CNN. The videos get better as the event progresses

  • What a complete asshole you are.

    We know the sequence of events so we can tell the orientation of the buildings so therefore we know that the camera did not have a line of sight on the incoming aircraft so ....therefore we know you are an asshole

    FUCK YOU

  • @cokefueledrage upvote for relevant username

  • My God that was the most calm reaction to a plane crashing into the tower ive EVER SEEN.

  • mel gibson is a legnad dont diss mel playa

  • Go to tvarchives , watch the original live footage on NBC. At 31:43 you will see something that may have wings but this object looks small to be a jetliner.

  • @jlsumme

    Maybe this? search tomahawk images

  • i worked at ground zero during the rescue, what the HELL is wrong with your minds that you support muderous inside job killers like this? GET A LIFE and or DIE and go away.

  • @frankradiotv thank you i was there when it happend. these people are fuktards

  • @frankradiotv

    And then you know the government lied about the air quality?

  • This video has been debunked. Even though the quality has been altered to make it seem like the plane is not there. You can still see the plane if you look for it.

    This is another Truth video that was debunked. Next?

  • @marcusdolby1 Dude, whats wrong with you? Why don't you find a friend who recorded the live video from this channel on Sept 11, you must know someone who has it. Then come back here and apologize for your stupidity. This is the live morning shot, in the afternoon they showed one without a background, which is what is found in the archives, but many live vids from that day exist on peoples vcrs, go find one. Or keep enjoying your coolaid, it's up to you.

  • I had at least 3 "blobs" on my playlists and one was excellent and all have been removed by Boobtube in the last month. Why? Its just old news.

  • Those people's tones didn't change at all. They'd just witness a huge jet smash into one of the tallest buildings in the world, which means lots of death and destruction, and that the first plane hitting wasn't an accident, and they don't even raise their voices A LITTLE. I would've been totally freaking out.

  • I didnt see a jet in this video. I see the towers and I see the explosion, but no jet.

  • Yes, it's hard to see, because it hit at an angle that is hard to see from where the camera is positioned, but there was a plane.

  • thats because the buildings are obscuring it, theres other live footage from NBC where you see it coming then hitting.

  • @milincoln Get a high quality version of this vid and you can clearly see a missile. This live feed is the only one they forgot to edit on that day. This vid along with the FOX nose-out is all one needs to know the truth, but there is SO MUCH MORE!

  • What are you smoking?????

  • Listen man, I am an audio engineer 18 years in the running and have done LOTS of video editing also. Stop trying to bullshit a An A / V pro. I can see the anomalie blurs moving across the screen and even with that....... I still see the plane. Give it up man....... this video is such bullshit I can smell it through my IP number.

  • @marcusdolby1 Are you talking to me, or Freethinker the nut-bar????

  • oops sorry bro. Yes I am talking to the nutbar. Or anybody who believes this doctered video.

  • @marcusdolby1 : this video is definitely doctored.

  • Comment removed

  • @milincoln Because it came form the blind side that you cannot see from that angle.

  • @milincoln exactly

  • @milincoln Are you saying no jet hit the second tower when hundreds of people by that time are recording with their home videos?

  • That is the point this video is attempting to illustrate

  • @milincoln The jet came from the right, it moved through the building and out the other end causing the massive explosion.

  • @milincoln maybe because the tower obscured your view of the jet... friggin moron

  • @jeremyc311709

    you are a frigging moron the same shot we saw WITH a jet was the same angle same shot, it was edited idiot!

  • @milincoln Yea dude. Where's the f@ckin' jet. Seriously. I never really heard of this conspiracy before, but I'm about to do a lot of research. You can be sure of that.

  • @jakedizzle it hit on the other side. its crappy quality but its there you can see cell phone vids of it hitting

  • @bezeedabest Yea, after researching this conspiracy it's just too far fetched. Seems like a ploy to discredit valid conspiracies. A way to generalize all theorists as nut jobs. I'm down for facts, not speculation. I can believe they were remote controlled aircraft due to eye witness interviews right after the impact. I remember seeing a video of a guy saying the plane didn't look like a commercial airplane. Then they just stop talking to him and start with someone else. Crazy stuff.

  • @jakedizzle There were plans released years ago about the government trying to remotely fly planes into buildings in, i think, Cuba. They were definitely capable. And if you look at some of the videos of the second plane that show the underside, there was definitely something on the bottom that shouldn't have been there.

  • @jakedizzle sometimes the harder it is to believe, the more people WILL believe. Reminds me of the O.J. trial when that dipshit woman said, "there's just TOO much evidence, it couldn't have been him, Too MUCH evidence"

  • @milincoln It's the angle. Jet came from behind (on this view) the tower it hit.

  • @archergrl1996 - That's the whole point of being a newscaster. You bring the news, not childish reactions.

  • @BayviewFinch -- It's not a childish reaction to exclaim or raise your voice when witnessing something horrific.

  • @archergrl1996 - Maybe they were briefed on what was going to happen before it happened.

  • @archergrl1996 You're not a news anchor, they're trained to stay calm no matter what they watch.

  • lol...truth movement run by jews...your wrong....the majority of truthers aint run by anyone...and any truther with ANY religious agenda is quickly exposed...by our harshes critics by far, other truthers... ...lies and racist bullshit just isnt torerated ....understand gentile?

  • "racist bullshit "

    "understand gentile?"

    Yeah, I think you're a Jew. Jews are not a race, and it's obvious a big conspiracy, and that all these people who lie about 9/11 have something in common.

    "Jews are behind wars," Jewish Mel Gibson said when he was drunk, but apologized when he was sober. He knows very well that Silverstein demolished his buildings, but is never going to say anything about that.

  • As to my faith...ive answered....if you are going to use mel gibson in your argument i can do nother for you.....and as i said hate speeches wont be tolerated here by any faith

  • typo...i can do nothing for you

  • @chrysaor911 i like what you said

  • that is true. the truth movement is a fraud. these idiots like alex jones and his fake group try to claim that tv fakery is a cia created disinfo. something they wont touch. tv fakery is the evidence to solving 9/11.

  • @chibangin007 It's not a fraud, they are just misinformed. While I hate the fact they are not willing to look at the overwhelming and pure evidence (I don't believe, I KNOW, as does anyone who has researched the no plane facts), I don't really blame them, and ultimately, it doesn't really matter if they are after the same people that we are. They just don't realize the depth of the involvement of media.

  • @chrysaor911 I liked the part where you were stupid enough to believe in religion. You mindwarped CUNT.

  • @BillyHixxx Lol....every person in every other civilization in the history of the world believed in something outside of this earth, something beyond what we humans could comprehend....this is the only culture that has ever accepted atheism as a legitimate belief, or even considered atheism as a possibility...you're a bit naive there my friend...

  • @undeadretard7 Its called progress my aptly named friend.

  • @ssike0 lol...progress...is it progress that the general public has gone from trying to discern the meaning of life to sitting on our butts and getting fat, while watching meaningless television shows that do nothing but waste our lives away? is it progress that we live in a fantasy world (digital world) instead of the real world? is it progress that we in western culture are enjoying overabundant luxuries while there are people starving to death? we haven't progressed...we've regressed

  • Comment removed

  • @chrysaor911 Alex Jones, Loose Change, Eric Hufschmid, Mike Piper, Daryl Smith, Jim Hoffman, Steven E. Jones, Jim Fetzer, etc., are Jews. They have been on Jewish television, but they're playing together with the reporters, and are not planning to do anything but discussing idiotic details. They're just going to get more and more silly. Now they're discussing whether planes or no planes hit WTC. This is such a stupid diversion, and would make most people think truthers are silly.

  • And what was supposed to have been the diversion that you mention?

    It seems more like 'you' are the diversion.

  • @olympicsnow No planes in WTC is one of the ridiculous diversions. Presidents and/or owners: Jew - CBS - William S. Paley, Leslie Moonves Jew - NBC - Jeffrey Zucker Jew - ABC - Stuart Bloomberg and George W. Bodenheimer Jew - ABC News - David Westin Jew - CNN - Gerald Levin, Reese Schonfeld (co-founder) Jew - FOX - Gail Berman, Rupert Murdoch Jew - MBS - Ronnessen Jew - Daily News - Maxwell, real name Hoch Jew - US News - Zuckerman
  • @chrysaor911 people must see that there are good Jews and bad Jews, and I'm not saying that is inborn, but rather that there is a vast conspiracy (see communism) that unscrupulous people infiltrated in various religions as in Catholicism, Islam and just to make judaismon with the average citizen is even more confusing, hindering an organization that can fight against those leaders who just want more control and power (and I'm talking about censorship) sorry for my english, greetings from Brazil!

  • @GentilesAgainstWar Know that zionists are different than your average Jew. don't become an antisemite, know that there are always small groups of extremists in every sect of religion. PLEASE learn to diffrentiate, or else you just look like a fucking nazi.

  • @GentilesAgainstWar what exactly do you mean by truth movement run by jews? explain yourself when stating such things..

    because i can say complete bullshit about you and then just leave...

    truth is not a movement btw... you need to research a hufe amount of info...

    not to mention that you didnt knew that JEWS existed ....

  • @GentilesAgainstWar hahah ur a racist idiot, using mel gibson in an arguement are you for real?!

  • @MrBaggies4lyf Jews are not a race. And Gibson is a Jew pretending to be a Jew hater, as many other Jews. They control all opinions.

  • so your not bothered about the details and the facts...other than it was all down too one particular religious group....we are all entitled to an opition...yours is a poor one...but its yours none the less

  • so not a remote control boeing then....as we know the technology since the late eighties... but you think a uav....which uav do you suggest might of been used???

  • Faith is not an issue ....firstly cos in not religious in anyway...secondly because unlike you....i have no agenda ( ive seen your site) Hate breeds hate my friend and it wont be tolerated here....lets keep relgious stuff to where it belongs ...in church....lets stick to the matter in hand

  • not this one ...the video response...you think thats too poor to see a boeing...well if that you think dude....we will have too agree to disagree

  • thks for all your comments....This video is not being used to prove anything here....its just a video of the impact that doesn't seem to have a big plane in it....does it prove there wasnt a big plane...no...of course not that was ever the claim.

  • the clip you refer to was shown LIVE on fox....it apparently came from their news chopper 5, just as it arrived in Manhatten it filmed the impact into the south tower ...in that footage the plane appears to fly through the tower (ill post that too)....this is no explosion...this is not consistant with other live shots...can you explain the discrepancy?? I can not

  • true...but you wont find a clearer version of the clip...and trust me, if there was a plane with a wingspan almost as wide as the towers in it ...it would be clearly seen....as in the ABC chopper 7 footage....ps...like us you want to see better quality footage...please lobby the networks to make high quality footage available, as up to 90% has never been released ....then this will end the debate

  • thats correct gentiles....i will post it a response....the object is more visable...but as to it being "the plane" ie a boeing with a 150 foot wingspan .... i'll let you guys decide