Added: 1 year ago
From: kevin604bc
Views: 28,170
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (123)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • umm...did anyone consider that the high voltage cables feeding that portion of the towers needed replacing? eventually the lines go bad the same way buried cables go bad. the workers were likely electrical contractors doing the work and since the lines (according to the blueprints) are fed from a power vault deep underground you need several workers to help with running the new cables through each section of conduit with minimal splicing. believe me, those power cables are a pain to install.

  • I have a 'pyrolytic' electric oven that cremates anything left inside by raising the internal temperature to an excess of 600c.the process takes 90 minutes.The heating elements are made of Iron and the oven is mild steel pressed.I have had it for 7 years now with not so much as ripple in it's casing from the heat. No steel girder can be weakened in the open-air at this temperature..Black smoke = 'vitiation' = low temp fire

  • Each one of you conspiracy theory people are sicker than the next.

  • @Rangerbelt - Read my post for some connection to the truth. Denial is a river in Eygpt, not a healthy way to live.

  • @390bullitt1968 that joke doesn't really work in print

  • MY nephew is CEO of a Europeon construction firm that has done contact demolition fo 40 yrs. Since 9-11-2001 he has held the opinion that the collapse of WTC-1-2-7 were all controlled demolitions using state of the art Hi tech explosives. The discovery of Nano Thermite at the scene proves beyond all doubt it was state sponsored terrorism, not some cave dwelling, coke snorting, drunks who preferred strip clubs to the koran. He hold a Ph.D

    in engineering.

  • @390bullitt1968 I've known some relatively stupid smart people in my life. I reckon your nephew is one of them. Honestly you American's can't get your head around the fact that someone who may or may not have lived in a mud hut in the middle of some Arabian desert had the smarts and the balls to carry an attack like this out, and so because you can't believe that happened it must have been an inside job. ALSO traces of nano thermite can be found in wiring, how much of that in the towers?

  • @russelljenkins69 - There are many facts you government shills refuse to admit. Buildings with massive asymetrical damage do not collapse with symetrical precision. Nano Thermite contains sulphur and barium. Those are not found in wiring.

    Sqiubs 40 floors below the collapse zone are visible on hundreds of videos. Thousands of witnesses heard hundreds of individual explosions. Bush refused to allow an investigation. There was never one shred of evidence pointing to OBL, say FBI head.

    U lie.

  • DIMITRI KHALEZOV

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • bush, you and your puppeteers will die in terrible suffering.

  • Comment removed

  • if they put explosives in there and everything, theres gotta be hundreds of people that know about it

  • the reason why there are so many conflicting conspiracies is because people make shit up and a group believes what they want. The truth is that people hate us and they flew planes into our buildings. besides if thermite was involved, thermite is unstable and any spark or anything could have set it off. Also who ever detonated the bombs would need to be in the building because a transmitter probably wouldnt work a few blocks away

  • @chillaxer1993 yeah! ok expert nothing that we were told about 911 makes sense even the pentagon is suspicious even when you here the truth out of silversteins mouth about building seven you still beleive it collasped from fire please wake up theres more proof of foul play then truth did it also seem fishy that two planes were hijack off coarse and a second plane got threw the worlds best defense twice and they knew they were of coarse and didn't intercept

  • @tjpization keep believing what the media tells you............

  • didnt anyone watch the conspiracy theorists explain this? It would take MONTHS of round the clock work to rig both towers with explosives...dont be an idiot people!! Everytime you blame your government you give the terrorists power!!

  • @tjpization lol what do you think 9/11 was planned in a day? 9/11 had years of planning so whats so surprising?

  • @tjpization In case the buildings were rigged, they mostlikely took their time to get it accomplished:) If it took a week, month or a year then it was so. Who ever the attackers were it took pretty long time to make the whole thing happen. I have never fully believed in controlled demolitions and but when iron-rich spheres and the big chunk of molten steel was found, that gave something more to think.+ dr. Judy Wood and Jack White's 911 photo studies gave even more.

  • Comment removed

  • Are suspicions here with the cops and the world trade center any skyscraper every day its wacko day all the time some wackos with a piglet all the time at these stores but you are have been pizza hut and bennigand and the outbackstores perverts with piglets wackos into bestality a lot to do with the twin towers richest people on earth have offices in the place i was unaware clearn wacko now you think

  • Did anything similar happen with north tower? The collapse of south is defo a controlled implosion.

  • @class37s I think I heard the north tower had a power down as well....that they occurred on conjunction with each other, even tho they didn't happen on the same day. And I've heard that some of the people that were openly sharing this information back in 2001-2005 etc, aren't willing to talk anymore. This includes Scott Forbes, the dude talking on this clip! There were also a lot of people who talked about "work men in overalls" working all over WTC1&2 around that time.

  • YOU HAVE MANY MANY GREAT VIDEOS!! THANK YOU FOR SHARING & POSTING ALL OF THIS EXCELLENT INFORMATION!!

  • I miss the Twin Towers ;-(:::::

  • Possibly the greatest engineering feat of implosive demolition ever seen, with the use of thermite devices evident on the remaining steel beams .

    Ferdinand Porsche , a fervent member of the Nazi Skull and Bone party ...the date prevalent on the Porsche 911 ... the same indicative of the emergency service ...911..the two buildings formed the number 11. The destruction of the towers was planned many years before they were built ! Ask George , he'll tell you .

  • I was a janitor there for 5 years i remember there was alot of commit scuiciding before 9/11

  • The biggest LIE (9/11) in the whole history told by anyone in this world, shame for the americans, i feel sorry for them hwo they were betrayed and dont wanna accept it..sorry guys, i cant do anyhting better thatn this..I hope someday americans will account thier government for this LIE...

  • @13holywarriors What is the best evidence you have seen that the Official account (i.e. the government's story) of 9/11 isn't true?

  • @13holywarriors

    I've tried showing everyone. It just doesn't register with them.

  • @MurcielagoAI

    Sadly enough ppl. DONNOT want to hear or know the TRUTH.

    "THEY" call ppl. cons.theroist,but ask yourself one question, "WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME YOUR GOVT. TOLD THE TRUTH?...About ANYTHING!?

  • plenty of time to plant explosives!

  • @irobot2009able definetly 

  • @irobot2009able Maybe we should contact these people so that they can set up ALL demolitions, as even the best ones take about a month to even plan it out and set the charges, and then it takes miles of cord and planning to place the cord because one little spark will set them off, and the plane hitting the building set off sparks on the building from that impact. So, where did they put all of the cord? How did they keep them from setting off on impact?

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 Dude, Rk showed how long the towers fell, and they collapse between 15-20 seconds, so no, they did NOT fall in 10 seconds! That is right, there is absolutely no evidence to back up the theory that bombs were planted now is there? How can any of you come to that conclusion without physical evidence to support it?

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 And guess what, so does cutting torches from people trying to clean up the biggest mess in US history! Also, you have no fucking idea what peer review is do you? Both federal and civilian, yes regular engineers have done review of the research, and they have no problems with it because they believe it. Only shape shifting idiots like you believe it! Find me some engineers who have peer review your movements work please!

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 Where is your peer reviewed work and who are the engineers who did it? You can say all day that 40K+ of steel falling with kinetic energy cannot destroy a building, but again, those engineers who reviewed the work of NIST deemed it correct, that is why it is accepted as fact, and that is why your people's shitty theories have not! Again, you can keep saying that it has been proven, and I am saying the 1500 out of the 1.5 million is not enough for it to be fact!

  • Comment removed

  • @BaldurdashWoW you can search all over this website for scientist that will say without resoonable doubt that steal dont burn unless its under duress of 35000 degrees of fire for a good deal of time. Yet these are the first buildings to come down from fire? after taking just one of the plane?they already had planned in the blueprints when they built the thing ( it could take the impact of TWO planes). Where that explanation. YOU DONT HAVE ONE!

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 Wait wait wait, are you confusing the fact that steel looses strength at temps like at 1800 degrees with the melting point, which is at 2800 degrees? And this website is NOT a forum for engineers to get peer reviewed! Provide their names and their contact information please! And no, they were built so that they would not fall over if a plane hit it, they did not know that the fire protection would be knocked off. Had you paid attention to the facts you would have known that!

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 Oh wow, you STILL have no paid any attention to what I just wrote! Have you ever wondered what would happen if it hit a building that was not as high up? The building was designed to survive an impact from the plane and not fall over, also not fall over in a hurricane. Except you would not know that because you are stuck in conspiracy land and not in the real world! Also, it is "You're lost" NOT "your lost" OK, "YOUR" is used for possession, so please use English the right way!

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 What, a grammar nazi? Yep! Lets see here, you forgot to capitalize the "I", you spelled "police" wrong. And "Hoser"? Wow, that one hurt.... And btw, you would have understood that the buildings were designed to withstand a jumbo just collision, and hurricane winds, meaning that the building would NOT fall over on impact or strong winds. You brought it up, and I am pointing out why you are wrong! Show me how I am discredited?! 

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 Oh wow, I am a "dum dum" for correcting your strawman about the towers being able to withstand the impact? BWAHAHAHAHAH!!!! First you defended that strawman, now you are denying it? Can't get your facts straight!

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 You fucking dumb ass, you still do not get it! The towers design made it so that when strong winds or something fell over or collided with it, it would not fall on impact, and it did not fall on impact, it fell because when a fucking plane goes 500 miles in hour, all that kinetic energy tore most of the columns to pieces, and it destroyed the fire resistant coating on the beams, thus when all the office furniture piled to one side, it burned at 1800 degrees, causing the collapse!

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 Dude the fucking fire insulation was 40 fucking years old, it is no wonder it fell off the beams when it hit! And you STILL do not get it! Did you not even read the report by NIST? The towers were built to withstand the impact, and had the towers been a lot newer, the insulation would still withstand it! But no, we are talking about a very old building! WOW YOU ARE A DUMBASS!!!

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 A peer reviewed research article that has been review by over a million engineers and denied by 1500, yea, I side with the majority! Again, the buildings were 40 years old, everything ages and loses potency in its structure. That is why old buildings need work done on them a lot of the time.

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 Wow, you think it takes one engineer to make it seem like it is true? You do not even know what peer review is! When over a million people shoot down a theory from 1500, that means their theory and thesis is WRONG! Go look up what peer review and find out what it fucking means you dumbass! And you are showing signs of Ad Hominems and strawmen claims, and now you do not even know what peer review is. Wow, just wow!

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 Wow, someone is getting really butt hurt that he cannot handle a real debate with someone! Is it not funny how you defended the towers being able to withstand the collision as proof that they should not have fallen, but fight the fact that a plane going almost 500 miles an hour could break off the fire retardant that is about 40 years old? Even if I were part of the government, it is still and Ad Hominem to suggest I am wrong because of it!

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 Oh wow, you are going to use Ad Hominems and circular reasoning now? So in the truther circles, the government is evil, therefor it's own investigations are wrong, despite they have shown that they had nothing to do with it? Again, the buildings were old, the fire sealant ages like everything else, and I am sure a plane going almost 500 miles an hour would knock a lot of stuff off of the beams! Hell, it twisted the frame on impact! Why do you think survivors could not open doors?

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 You still do not get it! All that damage in the lobby of both towers after the plane hit was from the impact. The plane had so much Kinetic energy (You do know what that is right?) that it tore right through the building a knocked a hole on the other side, destroyed a lot of the beams, and cause the frame to twist a little. Or are the survivors who said that they had to force the doors open because of it where in on it? Again, look it up!

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 Research what an ad hominem is and then get back to me OK?

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 Selective idiocy: "i know exactly what i have to know"- No, you know exactly what you WANT to know!

    Your movement screamed inside job before the smoke had fallen, and then your side fitted "evidence" in to support your theories, and then ignore all other people who raise an objection by throwing out their work by saying it does not count because it came from the "government"!

    Clearly you have not asked the survivors if it were true did you? They were inside the towers, mind you!

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 Dude, it is common sense, you can see, on multiple angles, the towers fell at the impact zone. Also you can clearly time the collapse down to between 15 and 21 seconds. Has your side PROVEN that they fell in 9 seconds? Also, the US would not need to collapse a building to get America to declare war! The planes ALONE smacking into the buildings would anger the US. But hey, the blind are always walking into bullshit avenue and getting run over by the idiot bus.

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 "my side dont have to proof anything go watch a live tape"- I have watched it in a thousand dollar program called adobe after effects. I started a timer right when the collapse started and right after the sound ended. The collapse was still halfway at 9 sec mark! And no, Silverstein LOST money that day. Would you not try to get your money back from the insurance companies if your buildings were destroyed? How much money did he get from the insurance?

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 And not taking any insurance on a building that was targeted before, without him even being in the picture for the first said attack? Oh and HOW MUCH MONEY DID SILVERSTEIN MAKE? How hard is it? You can't answer it can you? How much did he pay for the towers? Why would he say "pull it" on tv if it were a secret plot to destroy the building? Also, "your timers wrong"- Make a video proving it. RK did one, where is the rebuttal? Youtube exist's to make videos ya know?

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 He paid over 3 billion, and he took the 3 billion insurance plan, he broke even on his returns. It was REQUIRED to have insurance on the buildings due to the first attack that happened, one in which Silverstein was of no part of. Again, any person that is good with their money can double or triple their share, but does that make them evil? They work hard enough for what they do! Are you anti Semitic?

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 Again, you have no proof, that is why it is a conspiracy theory. If all of the millions of engineers believed it, then they would be hand in hand with all the other people to bring justice, but only 1500 came out. Nice.... Also,how about that video of yours PROVING that the towers fell in 9 seconds? Your side claims that they fell in that time frame, my side has proven that it did not, yet your side still, to this day, have not proven your side of the debate. Get with it!

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 It is a sure sign that a truther has lost when all he has is insults.

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 One of those things that your side says that does not add up, is the time the buildings fell. Make a video SHOWING that the towers fell in 9 seconds. You cant can you?

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 Um, "bro", saying that it fell in 10 seconds does not prove that it DID fall in 10 seconds! Make a video, and PROVE that it fell in that time frame!

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 Excuses excuses! Are you afraid to make your own video to prove us debunkers wrong? Wait, I forgot, the twoofers don't have to prove anything, their evidence is self evident, and therefor requires no proof at all of their claims! Please, everyone on here has seen how stupid you are, and how retarded your movements claims are! Again, either put up or shut up!

  • Comment removed

  • @hiesen666 Smarter? Excuse me while I go over here to the corner for a moment *BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!* That is some funny shit! Actually, it is called camera views from the people who were there and witnessed it. But again, you are doing everything in your power to avoid proving your point. That is what your team is, a bunch of pussies!

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @BaldurdashWoW One of the debunker sites shows still photos of what appears to be parts of the building that have broken off, far out pacing the collapse of the rest of the tower. If these are authentic, and if this debris' descent originated exactly or around where the building was actually collapsing, this would definitively disprove the free fall theory with physics we all learned in 4th grade. But these were stills, know of any vids that show something similar by chance?

  • @hiesen666 Also, why in the hell, if it were a scam, would someone take said money and build another one with all of that money? Oh wait, I forgot, it would "cost to much to clean the buildings of hostile contaminants"!

  • @BaldurdashWoW Haha, should probably try to use bit more tact if you wanna win people over to your side. Most of the videos arguing the merits of 9/11 are from the truther side. The cause is obvious - those who already believe (rightly, or wrongly) that we already know what happened don't need to make 90000 videos about it. The problem with this is, someone who is late to the part like me doesn't have a very unbiased source for information......

  • @BaldurdashWoW There are truther videos and debunker sites. Not that you're unbiased but I would like your opinion on something. I'm sure you've read about the "dancing israelis" arrested on 9/11 and held for, I believe, a few months before being deported to Israel. They were Mossad agents, and had a mural on their front company's van of the WTC and a plane. Ok whatever. But their buddies were also stopped, supposedly near the GW bridge with another van full of explosives.

  • @BaldurdashWoW What's you're opinion on these guys? Everything I've read looks really bad for them, and no foreign country would benefit more than Israel from 9/11. They released the police radio transmission recordings about them. Know anything about their Authenticity or relevance?

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Funny they deny/ignore him just like the 53 witnesses who saw JFK being shot from the grassy knoll.

  • @GeckoKing44 The WTC power down has been known and talked about by 9/11 Truthers almost since day one, so this is hardly news now. There was a power down then just like in 1963 the Secret Service was ordered to stand down (and the Presidential limo was ordered to slow down) when JFK was killed by the Johnson-Bush firing squad. Connally was also hit, and everyone in that car could also have been hit and killed, if not for their pure luck. You'll notice that LBJ sure wasn't in that car!

  • wonder if this guy is dead.

  • @MrMiikeeeey As far as I know he isnt dead, but he HAS had to go into deep hiding...he had numerous death threats, and had people shadowing him. He had to leave the country and go to different countries before finally getting safely back to the UK.

  • ,,hmmm?, matter falling TOWARD the path of MOST resistance?

    okay...if you say so....how stupid are the masses?

    =/

  • @wolfdaddy205 gravity only pulls one way dumb ass

  • ive never seen or heard this guys story on ABC NBC CBS ...

    Look we all know the govt is covering something.

    BUt what can we do about it??? NOTHING

  • @mikeyb198908 TRUE!

  • @mikeyb198908 If we can do nothing, because the powers that be are to great for the common man to overcome, than it should follow that there would never be revolutions, advancement of technology, thought and human evolution. It takes just a few couragous individuals to ween-out the truth from the corrupt and expose their deception and oppression. To say that we can do nothing is the very foundation of complaicancy and ignorance; which, in turn, causes the loss of freedom,of justice and of truth.

  • home come this dude wasnt at work in the tower on the day? coincidental day off?

  • I've seen him giving and interview I think in "911 Coincidences " a good series of videos

  • I've heard Forbes before but this has new detail.

    I wish all of the people who survived the towers collapse would be interviewed about this and other fishy actions around the building leading to 9/11

  • high profile people who have acknowledged the ISRAELI MOSSAD involvement in the 9/11 attacks

    I can list several off the top of my head:

    former head of the US ARMY WAR COLLEGE, Dr Alan Sabrosky

    former PRESIDENT OF ITALY, Francesco Cossiga

    former MI5 agent, Annie Machon

    renowned BBC correspondent Alan Hart

    US Marine Ken O’keefe

    there are more, but these are the ones I can list off the top of my head

  • SETTING UP THE CHARGES PROBABLY

  • @BlessedONE333returnz Or painting..Thermite can be mixed with paint and painted on walls /doors or anything..Who would question anyone painting? Nothing out of the ordinary.When that thermite dries it is very volitile.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more