Added: 4 years ago
From: Gravitationalist
Views: 20,960
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (96)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • KEN MILLER DRINKS BLOOD! I saw it on the youtubes.

  • Prof. Miller, Ok lets talk science. How do you know that god made the 'rules of the game'. As you said any absence of evidence should not be considered as evidence. So what is the evidence to support your hypothesis? It is faith based and hence its not science. Sure humans can compartmentalize this issue of science and religion but that says nothing about the issue itself.

  • religion and evolution are incompatible. You cannot have one and the other.

  • @xn117 indeed

  • A god is not necessary.

  • @xn117...A god isn't necessary when we put it in religion. God is a.....a better word for it, A scientist!!

  • @freedomland11 Up until the 21st century. It is understandable since humans couldn't think that far out of hte box

  • Thomas Henry Huxley - Darwin's bulldog!

  • I don't get Ken Miller though...

  • He must be so idiot to say that Science proof him that Sun did not pushed by some

    one hahahahha...do not read your stupid Bible which says there is two lights hahaa

    read Quran 14 century before which tell us that how the life and universal and nature

    been created and how does it works...

  • @strangerlover11 no, your book is man made,and so is the bible

  • @ShitInMyMouthAgain ..I don't talk about Bible because i know bible is fully contradicted but if you have any

    doubt about Quran than proof it because Quran itself chanllenging the peoples if you are honest than bring the

    similar verses in the Quran but for the pass 14 centuries no one able to do so....and about your Evolutions i can

    proof you that its totally bullshit and have not proof to prove it , it just mad man imaginations...hahahahh

  • @strangerlover11 "Quran itself chanllenging the peoples if you are honest than bring the

    similar verses in the Quran but for the pass 14 centuries no one able to do so"

    you are talking about (2.23), If you want something well written go for Shakespeare. He kicks the ass of god, allah, mohammed and whatever other grandstanding claims to offer celestial poetry for the masses

    and the arabic used to write the quran is extremely different from the one used today,

    try to do better than Robert Burns

  • @ShitInMyMouthAgain ...i know about shakespeare and also more than shakespear but did they claim that

    there poetry is similar or more superioure than quran no did that challenge quran no there poetry only for the

    time what they said but the poetry of Quran its talk beyond the human imaginations once you read the quran

    than all the poetry which said by shakespear it will gives same smells to you like a jackass....hahahah

  • @strangerlover11 I've read the quran (I am from a predominantly Muslim part of Croatia /next to Bosnia/) and it's inconsistent bullshit. The only thing is that humans have a natural tendecy for religion and purpose and thus when presented with that type of material and moreover SOCIETY they glorify it. Go climb a mountain, you don't need computers with your faith.

  • @ShitInMyMouthAgain ...and don't fuck talk about your fucking athiest god the fucking stupidity of human

    imaginations which totally failed have no base to stand you fucking athiest trying how to promote such a bullshit

    on the face of earth but if the person have a brain he or she never believe in your fucking idiology of athiest.

    the fucking demonized creatures base on fremasomic..............

  • @strangerlover11 And moreover, atheism is not a belief, it is a lack of it. Now why it fails so often ? Well, every human is born with a natural tendecy for belief, as I mention below, in a certain purpose and if thought from an early age or in social groups, the person will tend to believe. Now, atheism, and I think the most realistic type, sceptic atheism arises from questioning and thus needs individual thought. Every child is born a caveman and is thus more susceptible to religion.

  • @makkreol In fact, I think the tendency to follow leaders, which for me is the same instinct as tending to consider someone "higher", "holier than me" whatever, than you is evolutionary. Maybe some superior ape had to lead the hordes of idiotic apes, inexorably doomed by their own stupidity. We don't need that anymore. It will wear off. But it might take another three centuries or so.

  • @strangerlover

    That anger within you is rationality trying desperately to fight its way through the masses of bullshit that make up your subjective world-view.

    You have been so emotionally-dependant upon the idea of a higher being that you even claim Atheism has a God?!

    How can you not see the laughable hypocrisy in claiming it is the atheists and scientists who are wholly reliant upon "imagination" when you're the one claiming there's an omnipotent invisible magic man in the sky??

  • @strangerlover11 said: "he or she never believe in your fucking idiology of athiest."

    "An 'atheist' is a person who REJECTS BELIEF in God, regardless of whether or not his reason for the rejection is the claim that 'God exists' expresses a false proposition. People frequently adopt an attitude of rejection toward a position for reasons other than that it is a false proposition.." - Encylopedia of Philosophy, Vol.1, 2nd ed. MacMillan Reference USA (Gale). p. 359.

    Idiot.

  • @GodisDarwin ...Athiest is the most fucking idiot creatures on the face of earth in there fucking mind that every

    things exist itself........hahahhahahahha..­..by the way you saying apthiest have no religion so for your informations

    athiest is the follower of demonized cult rituals........freemasonic....­...

  • @strangerlover11

    Freemasonry is gnosticism you tool, you can't even join unless you profess to be a theist. They strictly do not allow any atheists in.

    Idiot.

  • @GodisDarwin they are totally demonz...........

  • @strangerlover11 For your information, we atheists reject all your little fertility stone age rituals and your puny togas, arm waving and white clothes. We reject your Masses and christian rituals as well as we reject black masses and satanic rituals. We reject ALL types of religions, cults or rituals. That INCLUDES freemasonry. Sorry to pop your conspiracy bubble.

  • @LesPaul2006..First of all you have no religion and you are totally jackass who care for you to accept or reject

    you are nothings go to hell..............hahahahha

  • @strangerlover11 Atheist have no brains? My man, the smartest people in the world and in history are and were atheist. Countries with an atheist majority register higher standards of living and lower crime rates. Atheist god?? You prove my point. Only the brainless and the weak are religious.

  • @LesPaul2006 ...I know Athiest the are the most criminals they belong to illominati a satanism rituals

    in every country with standard job or minister they have controled and today why the innocent dying this is

    the policy of Athiest but i agree with you its true they are braindead........hahahahah

  • @strangerlover11

    Prove it.

  • @NUTCASE71733 ...Proof what Darwanism base on Freemasonic satanism.......

  • @strangerlover11

    Yes, prove it. Last I checked freemasons were religious, and based by yur comments you have no clear knowledge of history in addition to science. Freemasons were religious so they weren't athiests like you beleive them to be. Furthermore, Freemasons founded America so by your logic America should be a satan-worshiing nation not a Christian nation (even though it's neither). Also, athiests don't beleive int he devil either so your "logic" falls flat.

  • @NUTCASE71733 ...You are 100% right freemasonic do not believe on Evil because they do worship of Evil

    have you read about freemasonic or have you been in there secret satanic rituals which many of American are

    belong too hhahhahahah go read about there satanic rituals i know through history how and when athiest rituals

    started before there were no athiest because some how they believe in there hand made gods...

  • @strangerlover11

    I said prove it, not make delusional rants. Most of the founding fathers of America were deists, meaning they beleived in god and thus worshiped him. Thomas Jefforson,t he man who wrote our constiturion was athiest, there was also a roman catholic and a devout christian among their number. they were all also freemasons, which is in the history books and that's how I know. Our money even has freemason symbols.

  • @strangerlover11

    I myself am not part of any big club like them. Secondly you mistake freemasons for Illuminati which have been rubbed out in the 1840s. Athiests beleive in no gods or even in the devil for that matter. Your point falls flat. Try to look up the words you're trying to use next time.

  • @NUTCASE71733 ....If you love to experience of freemasonic than just go to youtube you will got bizaar video

    about them ....Freemasonic + Illuminati = Athiest........hahhahahah

  • @strangerlover11

    You again fail to understand proper terms. I win.

  • @NUTCASE71733 ....You wine my arse...........hahahhaaha

  • @strangerlover11

    And now you delve into petty name-calling. And you wonder why no one wants to take you clowns seriously? You resort to childish tactics once your ideas are challenged. If you want creationism taken seriously, man up and provide solid evidence for people to study, or go away.

  • @NUTCASE71733 Yes i can provide solid and evidence proof in my video Scientifically proof that Evolution

    just baseless nonsense fictions which been tried to promote a foolish peoples like Athiest..hahahhaha

    watch the video in my profile ...(FOSSILS HAVE DISCREDITED EVOLUTION)and there other video also to prove

    you Scientifically that you on wrong way and totally carrying a childish mind in your sukll.......hahahhaha

  • @strangerlover11

    I said provide proof of creation, not baseless assumptions. Besides, you can't get rid of the theory of evolution to have Creation take it's place anyway. Ever hear of the correspondance principal?

  • @strangerlover11

    The correspondance principal relates to how many theories are more "evolved" and modified from earlier theories. Einstein's take on Newton's law of motion works better when we're talking about things in space for example. The correspondance principal took Newton's idea and expanded upon it while still retaining the original formula. As such for creationism to replace the theory of evolution, it has to keep a bit of the same things Darwin taught.

  • @NUTCASE71733 ...First of all we can not proof Evolution because till today every fossile they found It have

    big gape They just decieving peoples by combinding one fossile head other jaw other ear other nose and to showing to the fooooooool they found new creature billions years Old hahahhahah about Darwin I think in that time he did great work but if you analysis his work today than It become laughing things..hahahah

  • @strangerlover11

    There was only a few frauds, and they were made by people like you wanting to fool people to make money. They were subsequently disproved by the scientists.

  • @NUTCASE71733 ....They were subsequently disproved by the Science ? but you did't give me any exampe.

  • @strangerlover11

    You listed your "hoxes by evolutionists", which ou clearly didn't do any REAL research on, like all creationists do. Piltdown Man was always in question, and since science wasn't here it is now they couldn't officially decide it was fake until after 40 years. Nebraska Man was never accepted by the scientific community since it was just a tooth that was found. Scientists determined it was a pig's tooth, but the man bypassed peer review and published his findings in nat geo.

  • @strangerlover11

    Archeoraptor was never accepted either, as it was immediately found to have been faked and the farmer who found it admitted to making it himself. Ironically however, half the fake fossil WAS of a real animal; Microraptor, who would be discovered the following year.

  • @NUTCASE71733 ...I know they are Educated peoples and mostly what they found its also real but they

    tell the stories 1% accurate and 99% lie and that is the job of Satan=Evil.......hahhaha really i am not joking

    you know those peoples whom is tellings that some one have magic on you they also helping by Satan to

    estray peoples from God and trust him what he saying and Satan helping that Magin man but Satan always

    tell him 1% currect and 99% lie...hahahhaah

  • @ShitInMyMouthAgain ...So our books are man made and your bizaar rituals came from another universal or

    galaxies.........hahahhahah

  • the scientist in the beginning is a dumbass.

  • Oh My God. Europeans back in the day was so fucked by Chritianity. I wonder houw Athiests cope with it.

  • just 2 more of this boring but helpful thing

  • Evolution Theory is not a religion. It does not take religion into account. Why are you dragging your belief into this? You don't hear biologists saying "May Darwin guide thy feet upright and shape you into a man." Or "May Charles guide thy grip with opposable thumbs to grasp the truth of thy origins."

  • @Killjeser I partially agree. I disagree in that religion is not taken into account, but agree that it itself is not a religion. In order for evolution to exsist the christian church is wrong. They'll find a way to twist their own words in a way tha will work though.

  • I am thoroughly convinced that evolution is a means by which God used and continues to use to bring variety to the Earth. I find no fault in Darwin, he was an inspired man seeking for truth, and he found some. His findings have inspired others to make great leaps and strides. It seems pertinent to me that if evidence is there then it probably is true or may be true that is the wonder and strength of the science, and evolution by no means discredits or destroys God.

  • @elihall123 No, evolution doesn't discredit or destroy "God". It just diminishes "him".

  • remenber, the catholic god is not the only god believed in this earth. Don't mix religon and science up, what we need in science is a rational theory not a story of invisible god.

  • i proposed that idea too! that to remove the evolutionist from the Ultra-christian chopping block, all one has to do is agree that all the evolutionary process is by gods design! god created earth, and the evolution upon it! .....there! the Darwinian Society is absolved and saved!

  • The differences between our brain are more differences in size than structure. What makes us unique is how big it is, how we use it, and what we have achieved with it, not how it's built. We're the first species with the potential to live apart from nature, by technology we can take control of our destiny in ways no other species ever possibly could. We will eat meat grown in plastic tubes, we will create electricity from our own sewage, we will replace organs like car parts.

  • yay

  • Science and politics and religion are still working together to shape the official, acceptable world view. It still takes mavericks in each of these fields to break out and challenge the established big picture.

  • daddy paid his pension at his twenties. oh good old days of idleness- at least for the privileged ones.

  • darvin indeed worked off all his allowance and more... he did more to the mankind than millions of bitards like you are

  • i liked ken miller till i realised what a hypocrite he is. to apply scrutiny and persue academic truth in all areas and then cut his mind off at the proverbial knees is such an awful thing for an intelligent, educated person to do.

    don't tell me you use logic and reason, assert that everything is in accordance with logic, and explicable by laws of nature, all of which require scrutiny to recognise them, and then exclude god for absolutely no reason.

  • I totally agree with you, 325982668. I appreciate what Ken Miller has done and what he has to say in the field of biology -- and the way he speaks out against "Intelligent Design." In fact, I heard him speak at my university a few months back, but ... I balk whenever he talks about his faith. I don't buy it for a second. And if he's actually serious, he's as self-deluded as the next theist ...

  • Dawkins makes an excellent point about religious people who accept modern biology and the scientific method. Evolution may be the way god does things, but it's the simplest, longest possible way of doing things. it only appeals to an infinitely lazy god who has no interest other than watching micro-organic life for 3.5 billion years

  • Oops my bad I misunderstood your point a few comments ago. I thought you where ripping Ken Miller's science and supporting his religion. Turns out its the other way around. So basically I was preaching to the coir. Yes all puns are completely intentional...

  • @325982668 What is a day to a being that has no lifespan? What you call an infinitely lazy God sounds to me like the ultimate scientist: He started the experiment and wants to see what happens. Just because our own concept of time is specifically limited by how many years we live, God is infinite, and we can't conceive that kind of time frame. A day, a month, a year, a thousand years, these are nothing to a being that is immortal.

  • @intelligentignorance because an experiment isn't about letting the lab run wild ad infinitum. and what the hell kind of god do you worship??? billions of years of suffering and death, mass extinctions, the rise and fall of civilisations, the torture and execution of millions of sentient beings, and you call this an experiment??? i recant the previous statement. your god is the most sadistic, careless mad scientist to ever appear in the works of fiction.

  • @325982668 I find it interesting that is the kind of God you think I believe in, or that you think I believe in one to begin with. You posed what you thought of a God that uses evolution, I proposed that a God such as that is interested more in the ends than the means. Its just as much natural selection as anything to know the fittest survive the many wars we wage upon ourselves. As for your God, I'd prefer the one you suggested than the one that 'loves us' and let's us kill ourselves anyway

  • @intelligentignorance so the god you propose is callous and cares not for the endless suffering and death its experiment endures because it only cares about results? i'm confused as to what your position is. posit something and we can talk, i don't want to accuse you of anything.

  • I honestly doubt he really believes it. He probably espouses theism for familial and social reasons. He is far too intelligent to actually buy orthodox religion.

  • Actually the reason for the exclusion of god in a scientific argument is precisely for the reason that reason and scrutiny cannot account for him. Evolution, as in all science requires that the theories match the facts. Creationists look for facts that match their "theories." Unfortunately there are NO facts to support ANY of their claims. That is not to say that god doesn't exist at all, we just can't detect him so we do not allow for arguments from faith in scientific inquiry.

  • @325982668 Ken miller has a FUCKING DAY JOB where he puts his meaning and existence to good purposes and all i know is that you love god more than your wife, daughter/son and if you are pulling a sir Richard Owen i will literally CUT your tongue and stab your eye till you bleed that christian blood.

    I am a honest atheist and i have a violent tenancy to want to commit murder if you waste a few minutes watching a video that's against your beliefs and i know you don't want to die yet boy

  • @t3rr411 what in fresh hell are you talking about?

  • You christians, may be we share our bodys genes, but you are right, your brain come not from the CHIMPS, it comes from the...( wait..let me think..you go together blind and brainless following a shepard..If one falls over the cliff, the others follow it, dying all together...you are not able to think by yourselves as individuals 'caz you are victims of your own alucination in group) yesssss... you come from the SHEEPS

    (that's why you refuse any apes evidence...)

  • captainzero1969 is right - it's hard to be an asshole, if you don't exist!

  • Yes! finally Huxley's in the picture. I was waiting for this

  • God isn't an asshole but all his employees sure are.

  • god is an asshole

  • Enjoyed what Miller had to say... "God created the Rule Book, so to speak, and manages to play within those rules."

  • it's convenient, if nothing else

  • What's the difference between the flying spaghetti monster and what you said? You believe in things with no evidence but confort you but not in things that don't confort you.

  • thank you for posting the next episode as a video response to the last. makes it really easy to follow!

  • Ken Miller!

  • religious AND evolution,

    LOL

    God would send you to hell;

    and Darwin is laughing (or crying) his ass off in his grave!

  • thanks

  • cool

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more