To this day, QB's call audibles after seeing defensive set ups. TO's are called - and they are quickly recognized because ALL TEAMS study the tapes and recognize them. That is why it was denoted a 'minor infraction'. The advantage was to know this quicker - and while J. Johnson said that a lot of teams did it, the Pats took the heat (their bad). It is a major issue like nude cheerleaders would be (huge fine/lose pick). But a minor advantage which is why the Pats got to keep their bowl wins.
That was a stupid comment. You act like the whole team was on steroids or some other game enhancing miracle drug that helped them win - despite the entire league and world knowing what was up. It was defensive call signals moron - and easily changed or hidden if a team desired. After the announcement in early 2007, any team not hiding their signals (including the Pats) were stupid and deserved to lose. You think all the other teams didn't know and recognize defensive schemes - then adjust?
Millerdog, name me Brady's receivers before Moss? If you cant theres a reason, he didnt have any true superstars to throw to yet still won and put up solid numbers. Now, name me the Receivers BOTH Manning and Montana had for YEARS to throw to, both are HOF WR's Rice and Harrison. Why cant Brady have Moss and still be considered great, do you not consider those other QB's great because they had great WR's?
montana won a superbowl with out Rice.. with out roger craig... why dont you look at the roster of Montana 1st superbowl..
Brady had some stout players on his team.. if he didnt.. why did they make the superbowl.. put brady on the browns today.. if he does good.. then im wrong.. but he wouldnt.. Manning had harrison.. yep.but he was picked by the worse team in the NFL.dont forget.. deion branch started out in NE, Troy Brown was a solid WR.not comparable to Harrison, but he didnt have NOBODY.
Well you forget that Montana and Manning made their receivers great. Brady cheated with the Pats since from 01-07, along with having a superior defense to the 49er or Colts. Now his defense is fair and his offensive weapons he has were proven before they came to NE. Before being caught cheating he never lost an over time game and only lost 1 post season game.
LOL, Manning and Montana "made" there receivers great? LOL. Jerry Rice was LONG great before he came to SF AND AFTER Montana left. Harrison caught 64-73 balls for over 800+ yards per year with 6-8 TD's BEFORE Manning came. He was already a top receiver before Peyton showed up in 99'. Hey I'm all for saying great QBs can help "make" receivers look better than they are, but you dont take avg receivers and make them Hall of Famers. LOL. Sounds like you just hate Brady and Belicheck-deal with it.
Harrison never had a 1000 yard season or made a Pro Bowl until after Manning was drafted. The Colts had no offense and absolutely no defense (unlike the 2000 Pats) back then. Montana won 2 super bowls before Rice even was drafted, I guess since he knew he was getting Jerry Rice later on, that it help Montana, huh???
Just because he didnt have a 1k yard season before Manning is pure stupidity to use that stat ALONE as a indication of a great receiver. I said already, QB;s help, but dont MAKE. Manning helped, but Harrison's "other stats" were all right there. 65+ Receptions, 800+ yards, 8TD's, Manning increased those totals, but he didnt create Harrison. As for Rice, once Montana left, Rice still was an elite WR. They both complemented eachother, not created. Big difference.
The best cheaters dont cheat all the time because theyll more than likely get caught, so cheating when you need it the most just makes you "look great." Brady was a 6th string qb for most of his college career, Bellicheck was a losing NFL coach. Mixing them together doesnt equal 3 rings, no such thing as fairy tales. Its quite obvious they cheated. They wont win another ring, because of the fact they were never very well coached. Cassell even did a superb job with that offense last year.
They cheated? Its called advance scouting. There camera position was in the wrong, what they were doing was not. EVERY NFL team has tapes on others. The tapes were taken before 07' season, yet Brady had his finest year. What you say makes no sense. Secondly, there STILL WINNING, so again, what you say makes no sense. He won with Matt Cassell at QB, hes considered by other coaches former and current and players to be the one of the best coaches ever. But will take your word for it, LOL, dummy.
LOL, ignorant little boys!! Google "Dr Z Smooth Criminals" and you'll read how team were suspicious for years of the Pats cheating. 6th string COLLEGE qbs plus coaches with losing records dont equal 3 quick rings. If you choose to be ignorant, that is your choice. Matt Cassell won because he had the high powered offense, if Bellicheck is so good let him coach the browns to a winning season!!!
Im ignorant, your using "Dr Z" as a reference. LOL. Secondly you said Montana and Manning "created" two HOF WR's. Still didnt answer that question as well as why the Pats are STILL winning. If all this were the true reason for success, wouldnt the Pats just fall off the earth after 2007? Hasnt happened. There still one of the 5 best teams in NFL year in and out. BB WAS a great coach in Cleveland, actually the last time the Browns made the playoffs, guess who coaches them? Parcells swears by him.
Youre just ignoring facts and logic behind the Pats cheating. Ever heard of the LA Lakers, or the New York Yankees?? Players wanna go there because they have a track record of winning rings, Karl Malone, Gary Payton tried it (unsuccessfully, like Randy Moss, Wes Welker, and Dante Stallsworth). They ofcourse attracted these players like other sports teams. They cant win big games without cheating, they have proven this.
They have proven this?How so? If they win the SB this year (could happen) they have proven they cant win "big games". Thats laughable.The bottom line is the team is still ELITE level in NFL and is not going away anytime soon as long as Belicheck and Brady are around and probably just as long as Belicheck is around after TB is gone.The bottom line is regardless of whats happened in the past-it hasnt slowed the Patriots train of success,so how important was it really if it hasnt made a difference?
Whats funny is that the Pats, who have (especially in 07) the easiest schedule due to their division, padded their stats and Brady played all the last game to get 50 TDs. Manning sat out 80% of the games after they won home field advantage and still had 49.
Again Manning missed 80% of the games after they clinched? Says here in STATS he played 16 games. Actually what you SHOULD have used was Manning did it in less attempts, that would be a better argument. 497 AT for PM, 590+ for TB. However also saying they played a weak sched in 07' while playing Pit, Ind, NYG, Dal, SD, Phil, Bal while undefeated and being "gunned for" every week is borderline insane. If anything that sched with the circumstances of being without loss is more brutal than anyones.
Manning started yes, but played very limited minutes. Playing the 07 Dolphins, Jets, and Bills 2 times each is an easy schedule, yes. They didnt get very many injuries which i a blessing..but why keep the starters in all game vs these teams? I mean the Colts had a very banged up team missing 2-3 O linemen, no harrison, no Addai, probably no Bob Sanders at the least and the Pats barely won...but a win is a win.
Agreed, but it was offset IMO with the teams out of division they played. Your not going to play a playoff team every week and neither did 07' Pats. As far as Brady playing all game in routs, thats a untruth portrayed and believed by Pats haters. Many times that year Brady played 3 or 31/3 Quarters and people STILL complained they were running up the score and that he should only play halfs of games. Also NE was in a different position playing against history, they couldnt rest guys after clinch
My thing is Im not arguing Manning over Brady. Manning is the better QB history will show. What I am arguing in "how much better" is he really all things considered. Im also arguing to give Brady and Belicheck there due. There both AMAZING talents in each's position within there profession. Some of the best ever. People hate the organization and players because they win ALOT and take away credit from these two guys. Cant we just enjoy watching them and appreciating there greatness?
Yes, we are lucky to have the rivalry because when they slack off, the Steelers go to the Super Bowl!! I dont think there will be any unbeaten teams this year as the Colts are hanging on by a stretched string with all their injuries and I dont think the Saints are good enough to beat the Pats. The Vikings should be playing whoever in the Super Bowl, and it will be interesting.
Brett Favre and Adrian Peterson, with that defense is just too intimidating. I think even an avg qb like Flaco, Orton could win with Peterson...having Favre fills the spot that much more!
WOW.. what an ARM.. i especially liked that deep frozen rope ball to his WR.. wait.. wtf? he only throws dump passes.. no wonder he broke the record for most consecutive completions in the NFL.. nothing has changed.. Probably the most Overrated player to ever come thru the NFL.. he is good.. dont get me wrong.. but just overrated.. His team on the other hand.. GREATNESS
haha tom brady is overrated ? thats the dumbest comment ive ever seen. lol im pretty sure he broke every record there is and has been knocking on the door for a super bowl every year he hasn't won it. the patriots would not be what they are without tom brady. he doesn't take chances and will check down rather than make a low percentage throw.
Or maybe he just threw it to Randy Moss in triple coverage.. with out randy moss, Tom Brady never even thew for more than 28 touchdowns.. and 1 year moss comes and he just about doubles that.. what a coincidence
please soccer is crap compared to football, at least football players can take a hit, soccer players are the best bunch of actors i've ever seen in my life.
the pats might have screwed up their chance of perfection but they WERE the best team by far throughout the season so try winning every game in a season assfaced giants fans
no, you suck, oh wait how stupid of me.....of course the mvp sucks, only a player who takes their team undefeated in a season would suck....sorry asshole!
The O line was so good all season. It looks like they didnt prepare for what they had in store for the Pats. But its no excuse they played them in week 17 and knew what they do.
maddeo
MsBigmusic 1 month ago
bradys pre-game music.
takeYOURreadstep 4 months ago
haha the music...perfect for some reason
riseoveruin 9 months ago
If only people playing with him knew what he would be today. Haha
emokidissad12 10 months ago
did you get this music from a p0rn movie?
RICHYrichMEOW 10 months ago
@Veenstra14
yep your right, If you cant be someone you hate them
jaberikramah 1 year ago
the only reason people hate on Brady is because he is better then they will ever be
Veenstra14 1 year ago
wow, 5 yard receptions. that's awesome. love the music too.
adam75south 1 year ago
hey thats cool! tom brady is his teenage days lmao
BlueMountain01 2 years ago
To this day, QB's call audibles after seeing defensive set ups. TO's are called - and they are quickly recognized because ALL TEAMS study the tapes and recognize them. That is why it was denoted a 'minor infraction'. The advantage was to know this quicker - and while J. Johnson said that a lot of teams did it, the Pats took the heat (their bad). It is a major issue like nude cheerleaders would be (huge fine/lose pick). But a minor advantage which is why the Pats got to keep their bowl wins.
BourbonAnakin 2 years ago
That was a stupid comment. You act like the whole team was on steroids or some other game enhancing miracle drug that helped them win - despite the entire league and world knowing what was up. It was defensive call signals moron - and easily changed or hidden if a team desired. After the announcement in early 2007, any team not hiding their signals (including the Pats) were stupid and deserved to lose. You think all the other teams didn't know and recognize defensive schemes - then adjust?
BourbonAnakin 2 years ago
imagine how fun it was for college stars to play in high school.
thecarrotdude 2 years ago
Millerdog, name me Brady's receivers before Moss? If you cant theres a reason, he didnt have any true superstars to throw to yet still won and put up solid numbers. Now, name me the Receivers BOTH Manning and Montana had for YEARS to throw to, both are HOF WR's Rice and Harrison. Why cant Brady have Moss and still be considered great, do you not consider those other QB's great because they had great WR's?
rage123669 2 years ago
montana won a superbowl with out Rice.. with out roger craig... why dont you look at the roster of Montana 1st superbowl..
Brady had some stout players on his team.. if he didnt.. why did they make the superbowl.. put brady on the browns today.. if he does good.. then im wrong.. but he wouldnt.. Manning had harrison.. yep.but he was picked by the worse team in the NFL.dont forget.. deion branch started out in NE, Troy Brown was a solid WR.not comparable to Harrison, but he didnt have NOBODY.
Millerdog088 2 years ago
Well you forget that Montana and Manning made their receivers great. Brady cheated with the Pats since from 01-07, along with having a superior defense to the 49er or Colts. Now his defense is fair and his offensive weapons he has were proven before they came to NE. Before being caught cheating he never lost an over time game and only lost 1 post season game.
jdigitalseven 2 years ago
LOL, Manning and Montana "made" there receivers great? LOL. Jerry Rice was LONG great before he came to SF AND AFTER Montana left. Harrison caught 64-73 balls for over 800+ yards per year with 6-8 TD's BEFORE Manning came. He was already a top receiver before Peyton showed up in 99'. Hey I'm all for saying great QBs can help "make" receivers look better than they are, but you dont take avg receivers and make them Hall of Famers. LOL. Sounds like you just hate Brady and Belicheck-deal with it.
rage123669 2 years ago
Harrison never had a 1000 yard season or made a Pro Bowl until after Manning was drafted. The Colts had no offense and absolutely no defense (unlike the 2000 Pats) back then. Montana won 2 super bowls before Rice even was drafted, I guess since he knew he was getting Jerry Rice later on, that it help Montana, huh???
jdigitalseven 2 years ago
Just because he didnt have a 1k yard season before Manning is pure stupidity to use that stat ALONE as a indication of a great receiver. I said already, QB;s help, but dont MAKE. Manning helped, but Harrison's "other stats" were all right there. 65+ Receptions, 800+ yards, 8TD's, Manning increased those totals, but he didnt create Harrison. As for Rice, once Montana left, Rice still was an elite WR. They both complemented eachother, not created. Big difference.
rage123669 2 years ago
The best cheaters dont cheat all the time because theyll more than likely get caught, so cheating when you need it the most just makes you "look great." Brady was a 6th string qb for most of his college career, Bellicheck was a losing NFL coach. Mixing them together doesnt equal 3 rings, no such thing as fairy tales. Its quite obvious they cheated. They wont win another ring, because of the fact they were never very well coached. Cassell even did a superb job with that offense last year.
jdigitalseven 2 years ago
They cheated? Its called advance scouting. There camera position was in the wrong, what they were doing was not. EVERY NFL team has tapes on others. The tapes were taken before 07' season, yet Brady had his finest year. What you say makes no sense. Secondly, there STILL WINNING, so again, what you say makes no sense. He won with Matt Cassell at QB, hes considered by other coaches former and current and players to be the one of the best coaches ever. But will take your word for it, LOL, dummy.
rage123669 2 years ago
LOL, ignorant little boys!! Google "Dr Z Smooth Criminals" and you'll read how team were suspicious for years of the Pats cheating. 6th string COLLEGE qbs plus coaches with losing records dont equal 3 quick rings. If you choose to be ignorant, that is your choice. Matt Cassell won because he had the high powered offense, if Bellicheck is so good let him coach the browns to a winning season!!!
jdigitalseven 2 years ago
Im ignorant, your using "Dr Z" as a reference. LOL. Secondly you said Montana and Manning "created" two HOF WR's. Still didnt answer that question as well as why the Pats are STILL winning. If all this were the true reason for success, wouldnt the Pats just fall off the earth after 2007? Hasnt happened. There still one of the 5 best teams in NFL year in and out. BB WAS a great coach in Cleveland, actually the last time the Browns made the playoffs, guess who coaches them? Parcells swears by him.
rage123669 2 years ago
Youre just ignoring facts and logic behind the Pats cheating. Ever heard of the LA Lakers, or the New York Yankees?? Players wanna go there because they have a track record of winning rings, Karl Malone, Gary Payton tried it (unsuccessfully, like Randy Moss, Wes Welker, and Dante Stallsworth). They ofcourse attracted these players like other sports teams. They cant win big games without cheating, they have proven this.
jdigitalseven 2 years ago
They have proven this?How so? If they win the SB this year (could happen) they have proven they cant win "big games". Thats laughable.The bottom line is the team is still ELITE level in NFL and is not going away anytime soon as long as Belicheck and Brady are around and probably just as long as Belicheck is around after TB is gone.The bottom line is regardless of whats happened in the past-it hasnt slowed the Patriots train of success,so how important was it really if it hasnt made a difference?
rage123669 2 years ago
Whats funny is that the Pats, who have (especially in 07) the easiest schedule due to their division, padded their stats and Brady played all the last game to get 50 TDs. Manning sat out 80% of the games after they won home field advantage and still had 49.
jdigitalseven 2 years ago
Again Manning missed 80% of the games after they clinched? Says here in STATS he played 16 games. Actually what you SHOULD have used was Manning did it in less attempts, that would be a better argument. 497 AT for PM, 590+ for TB. However also saying they played a weak sched in 07' while playing Pit, Ind, NYG, Dal, SD, Phil, Bal while undefeated and being "gunned for" every week is borderline insane. If anything that sched with the circumstances of being without loss is more brutal than anyones.
rage123669 2 years ago
Manning started yes, but played very limited minutes. Playing the 07 Dolphins, Jets, and Bills 2 times each is an easy schedule, yes. They didnt get very many injuries which i a blessing..but why keep the starters in all game vs these teams? I mean the Colts had a very banged up team missing 2-3 O linemen, no harrison, no Addai, probably no Bob Sanders at the least and the Pats barely won...but a win is a win.
jdigitalseven 2 years ago
Agreed, but it was offset IMO with the teams out of division they played. Your not going to play a playoff team every week and neither did 07' Pats. As far as Brady playing all game in routs, thats a untruth portrayed and believed by Pats haters. Many times that year Brady played 3 or 31/3 Quarters and people STILL complained they were running up the score and that he should only play halfs of games. Also NE was in a different position playing against history, they couldnt rest guys after clinch
rage123669 2 years ago
My thing is Im not arguing Manning over Brady. Manning is the better QB history will show. What I am arguing in "how much better" is he really all things considered. Im also arguing to give Brady and Belicheck there due. There both AMAZING talents in each's position within there profession. Some of the best ever. People hate the organization and players because they win ALOT and take away credit from these two guys. Cant we just enjoy watching them and appreciating there greatness?
rage123669 2 years ago
Yes, we are lucky to have the rivalry because when they slack off, the Steelers go to the Super Bowl!! I dont think there will be any unbeaten teams this year as the Colts are hanging on by a stretched string with all their injuries and I dont think the Saints are good enough to beat the Pats. The Vikings should be playing whoever in the Super Bowl, and it will be interesting.
jdigitalseven 2 years ago
Brett Favre and Adrian Peterson, with that defense is just too intimidating. I think even an avg qb like Flaco, Orton could win with Peterson...having Favre fills the spot that much more!
jdigitalseven 2 years ago
@jdigitalseven You can't honestly compare Brett Favre to Kyle Orton.
Even at this age, Favre isn't average...
johnsoncody17 1 year ago
@rage123669 brady is better than manning and history will show that, i think you have it confused
pats4lifebb 1 year ago
that is tom brady his old high school serra high.
kevin41545 2 years ago
the music is soo gay
vallypoint9 2 years ago 8
you the best football player in the world i have a super bowl jersey of it is awesome like you
redsoxforver 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this video SUCKS- stop putting up videos- you SUCK as well
hoos4uva23 2 years ago
shut up! Tom is the best quarterback there is
jmpatriots 2 years ago 16
WOW.. what an ARM.. i especially liked that deep frozen rope ball to his WR.. wait.. wtf? he only throws dump passes.. no wonder he broke the record for most consecutive completions in the NFL.. nothing has changed.. Probably the most Overrated player to ever come thru the NFL.. he is good.. dont get me wrong.. but just overrated.. His team on the other hand.. GREATNESS
Millerdog088 2 years ago
haha tom brady is overrated ? thats the dumbest comment ive ever seen. lol im pretty sure he broke every record there is and has been knocking on the door for a super bowl every year he hasn't won it. the patriots would not be what they are without tom brady. he doesn't take chances and will check down rather than make a low percentage throw.
bmvz4a 2 years ago
Yeah thats how he broke peyton mannings touchdown record, by throwing dump offs all season.
This is HIGH SCHOOL, RETARD>
chris371 2 years ago
Or maybe he just threw it to Randy Moss in triple coverage.. with out randy moss, Tom Brady never even thew for more than 28 touchdowns.. and 1 year moss comes and he just about doubles that.. what a coincidence
Millerdog088 2 years ago
if your so great and know so much why dont we see you in the NFL?
bmxr332b 2 years ago
wow each pass was like five yards long nub cake
minteqrq 2 years ago
he was tossing bullets far before the manning brothers thats why together they still don't measure up
sensimichael 2 years ago
YEA!! BRADY!!
THE greatest QB to ever play the game!!
jeffswanton54 3 years ago
Tom Brady IS AWESOMEEE!
stryker1707 3 years ago 3
u all suck GO PATS!
sublimeknight129 3 years ago
when u returning so the jets will (finally) hav competiton bsides offense
mariobaseball808 3 years ago
man how long ago was that?
gmenrule1024 3 years ago
Oh yeah, Tom Brady, before he should have considered about a Vasectomy.
Jiltedin2007 3 years ago
i could've made those passes and i've never played a down of futbol de americana in my life.
danowensyou 3 years ago
just like i can kick a round ball down a field and i've never played a second of soccer in my life...stfu
jayhawk2340 3 years ago
I'm sure you can pal.
danowensyou 3 years ago
please soccer is crap compared to football, at least football players can take a hit, soccer players are the best bunch of actors i've ever seen in my life.
jayhawk2340 3 years ago 3
tom breydy number one in the nfl
DANIEL2009360 3 years ago
Not overly impressive.... in this video he looks like a typical high school quarterback.
DALSTAR2020 3 years ago
lol...those were some easy ass passes, the credit doesnt go to him...it goes to the runner.......
Teezatos 3 years ago
Peyton Manning is shit compared to Brady.
He can't accept it when he has a bad game so he'll blame someone else (like his O-line and will say they didn't handle the rush better)
So shut up u bumhole diving homo
brentybop 3 years ago
Yeah, Brady blamed his "bum ankle" for all the bad passes he made in the Super Bowl
stevo53221 3 years ago
the pats might have screwed up their chance of perfection but they WERE the best team by far throughout the season so try winning every game in a season assfaced giants fans
langerclanger 3 years ago
wow waht a great clip...he threw a screen and the reciever did all the work...he is freakin awesome.(sarcasm)
dannthumann 3 years ago
LISTEN
brady is one of the best QBs of all time
his O-line wasn't the best at the superbowl but they cant just be blamed
manning had a great game and his D-line was awesome
all u haters out there go pay out another teAm... like the dolphins or the rams
crowenuggets21 3 years ago
Tom Brady couldn't keep his Dick in his Pants!
Jiltedin2007 3 years ago
Hey congrats Patriots on a amazing season.
And all you Giants fans, go hate on another video. We don't need that crap here.
freesaftey805 3 years ago
no, you suck, oh wait how stupid of me.....of course the mvp sucks, only a player who takes their team undefeated in a season would suck....sorry asshole!
wiggy26 3 years ago
18-1
sixthman36 3 years ago
Tom didn't choke-His O-line couldn't handle the onslaught brought. THe giants Defense was on meth or someshit superbowl sunday.
9knocken 3 years ago
The O line was so good all season. It looks like they didnt prepare for what they had in store for the Pats. But its no excuse they played them in week 17 and knew what they do.
goredsox1211 3 years ago
sweet music
dafreshyfreshy 4 years ago
tom brady is the man
swu12 4 years ago
Excelent Video
tom12brady 4 years ago
nice video
ohmychickenballllls 4 years ago