dumbasses, unibodys have disadvantages in any rough terrain, and towing, and anything else that need beefy structure, they also suck to work on because the pinch welds where u lift them are often rusted out
unibody= great for car, but sucks for suvs and pickups
Free energy has been here for a while ,But a few ppl make too many billions from our energy needs to let this technology be known,Get a motor that needs no gas or electric input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the energy revolution!
UNIBODY!!!!!!!!!! Faggot truck!!!!! American car designers are just plain faggots! cock sucking homosexual psychopaths. Why don't you all just blow up all of your car factories if you all just want to destroy it after all the stupid designs you are all unveiling every year. The Explorer is even more stupid off-road!!!! It has a traction system of a donkey.
@quatlen yes it is, unibody CANNOT go off road, they will get destroyed, also, unibodys can't handle real towing... entirely defeats the purpose of an SUV
@joek0617 Statistically speaking most Americans use their SUV's as urban crawlers and not as off road vehicles. Ford has proved that the new Explorer is plenty capable off road, although its not as good as the Jeep Grand Cherokee it features better mpgs and a better ride, things that most Americans favor. Ford still left the Expedition for now and if you think if humans never evolved than where would we be? The Explorer is pointed in the right direction.
@quatlen i'm not saying it should'nt evolve, just that a unibody's the wrong direction, if u want a unibody, go buy a car or minivan, SUV's are for situations where u need 4x4, and for towing, which unibodys suck at, because all they are is sheet metal, whereas a ladder frame provides greater rigidity, which is essential for towing. besides, where i live, unibodys rust out within like 5 years
I agree. I hate this stupid car-based piece of shit. Why are American company's destroying are OWN cars. I have a 2009 explorer and I love it. I need the truck-based off-road capability, and especially the 7,100 Lb towing capability for my boat that I haul. Making our cars smaller is destroying the American style of cars completely.
I agree. I hate this stupid car-based piece of shit. Why are American company's destroying are OWN cars. I have a 2009 explorer and I love it. I need the truck-based off-road capability, and especially the 7,100 Lb towing capability for my boat that I haul. Making our cars smaller is destroying the American style of cars completely.
I agree. I hate this stupid car-based piece of shit. Why are American company's destroying are OWN cars. I have a 2009 explorer and I love it. I need the truck-based off-road capability, and especially the 7,100 Lb towing capability for my boat that I haul. Making our cars smaller is destroying the American style of cars completely.
true i just found out about the ecoboost twin turbo but even still they should keep the v8 and give it twin turbo and the same tech as the v6 and WAMMO ya got yourself on badass explorer
dumbasses, unibodys have disadvantages in any rough terrain, and towing, and anything else that need beefy structure, they also suck to work on because the pinch welds where u lift them are often rusted out
unibody= great for car, but sucks for suvs and pickups
joek0617 6 months ago
your voice is annoying as fuck
DlStreamnet 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free energy has been here for a while ,But a few ppl make too many billions from our energy needs to let this technology be known,Get a motor that needs no gas or electric input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the energy revolution!
jjerkings2890 1 year ago
it'a the best SUV car
Mr00fireman00 1 year ago
UNIBODY!!!!!!!!!! Faggot truck!!!!! American car designers are just plain faggots! cock sucking homosexual psychopaths. Why don't you all just blow up all of your car factories if you all just want to destroy it after all the stupid designs you are all unveiling every year. The Explorer is even more stupid off-road!!!! It has a traction system of a donkey.
Blitz4000 1 year ago
@Blitz4000 lol oh wow. What are you 12.
sweetwater88 1 year ago
The inside is PIMP as hell! The outside looks a bit cartoonish
sweet00976 2 years ago
1. ew
2. why the fuck would u make the explorer a crossover
3. FORD IS DESTROYING THE MOST POPULAR SUV IN AMERICA FOR 18 YEARS!!!!!
ghost1103 2 years ago 10
Well..., I can agree with you, on 2...but, 1 and, 3 is questionable!
BklynJayL 2 years ago
all car company's must evolve to stay alive and its not like the explorer is throwing away its heritage!
quatlen 2 years ago
yes,yes it is
sammy1995021 2 years ago
@quatlen yes it is, unibody CANNOT go off road, they will get destroyed, also, unibodys can't handle real towing... entirely defeats the purpose of an SUV
joek0617 6 months ago
@joek0617 Statistically speaking most Americans use their SUV's as urban crawlers and not as off road vehicles. Ford has proved that the new Explorer is plenty capable off road, although its not as good as the Jeep Grand Cherokee it features better mpgs and a better ride, things that most Americans favor. Ford still left the Expedition for now and if you think if humans never evolved than where would we be? The Explorer is pointed in the right direction.
quatlen 6 months ago
@quatlen i'm not saying it should'nt evolve, just that a unibody's the wrong direction, if u want a unibody, go buy a car or minivan, SUV's are for situations where u need 4x4, and for towing, which unibodys suck at, because all they are is sheet metal, whereas a ladder frame provides greater rigidity, which is essential for towing. besides, where i live, unibodys rust out within like 5 years
joek0617 6 months ago
i feel the same way but things have to change
whelenvortexr4 2 years ago
@ghost1103
I agree. I hate this stupid car-based piece of shit. Why are American company's destroying are OWN cars. I have a 2009 explorer and I love it. I need the truck-based off-road capability, and especially the 7,100 Lb towing capability for my boat that I haul. Making our cars smaller is destroying the American style of cars completely.
SecularTechnology 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ghost1103
I agree. I hate this stupid car-based piece of shit. Why are American company's destroying are OWN cars. I have a 2009 explorer and I love it. I need the truck-based off-road capability, and especially the 7,100 Lb towing capability for my boat that I haul. Making our cars smaller is destroying the American style of cars completely.
SecularTechnology 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ghost1103
I agree. I hate this stupid car-based piece of shit. Why are American company's destroying are OWN cars. I have a 2009 explorer and I love it. I need the truck-based off-road capability, and especially the 7,100 Lb towing capability for my boat that I haul. Making our cars smaller is destroying the American style of cars completely.
SecularTechnology 1 year ago
LOVE IT!
clandestinesoldier 3 years ago
the engine options suk, 2.3 FOUR CYLINDER, or a suky 6 CYLINDER 3.5 i want the 4.6 V8?!?
sammy1995021 3 years ago
the 3.5 6 cylinder is an ecoboost which means v6 fuel economy with v8 of higher performance
jeepman787 2 years ago 2
true i just found out about the ecoboost twin turbo but even still they should keep the v8 and give it twin turbo and the same tech as the v6 and WAMMO ya got yourself on badass explorer
sammy1995021 2 years ago
omg that would be awesome
even in an expedition
jeepman787 2 years ago
Not impressed.....
Also I am Anti-Unibody... I like being able to fix things myself, not buying a whole new wraper
FordManMT 3 years ago 3
i dont know if anyone will agree with me but concept cars look like toy cars
318mopar383 3 years ago 2
Don't like it... At all!
astoria30001 3 years ago 2