to claim as a FOOl not matter before the big bang is INSULTING as the UNiverse is full of matter and the known Universe just a cloud in it... you follow fools off cliffs of stupidity and BAD MATH!
I hold all 3 theories above the Big bang now number 4 in any kind of theory credibility
! It is 4rth
I hold the correct model of the Universe pre and post
The Big bang is the 4rth in theories where 2 singularities FLY BY and mix tails of gas that follow them. 2nd is the direct hot of 2 singularities dead on at high speeds. 3rd is the spiral in of 2 singularities to make a Jets of gas that then made stars as all of them explain the magical HIGGS , dark energy and string theory to be FALSE and not ever exist as plain physics wins over follies of theories on theories to make fools of us all.
Condescending? I made it as neutral as possible, but there have been things that were established as truth and observed multiple times, you just can't deny those. Besides the fact that i used pure deductive reasoning, point me any gap i left in and i'll be happy to elaborate.
please don't respond to this...but...i already knew the theory of the big bang....no my question to you is...where did the energy come from that, i guess you could say, facilitated the big bang? just food for thought. i'll pray for you.
Maybe a bit late, but it's good you ask. Conservation of energy in a closed system is always constant, an important physical law. The universe truly is such a system, since there are no known outside influences on it. The first law of thermodynamics embodies it. Entropy, the second law, would be in trouble if it weren't, since it states how part of energy you convert is lost to the environment.
I am impressed you can disprove the 2nd law of thermodynamics by saying that things were different before the big bang. You totally lost credibility for me. Also it is "God" and "gods", notice the subtle capitalizations.
I suspect you have no idea what that law actually embodies, so don't even start on credibility. And why do you think i spel god like the way i do, shouldn't be that hard to figure out.
I hope my engineering degree gave me some insight/credibility to thermodynamics. Blatant disrespect, by the lack of capitalization, does not prove any points, just shows foolishness/ignorance.
I've started an education in physics at the university and we've just studied thermo, so it is rather accurate. And care to explain how not capitalising is disrespectfull? Do you capitalise when typing about the flying spaghetti monster? Since that is of equal status as other religions.
I dont understand the spaghetti monster example, and how it relates to religion. By not capitalizing God, it shows disrespect to what other believe in by claiming that God is at the level of a god. A god being something like money, Zeus (capitalized), ect.
Side note, you may want to think about switching to one of the engineerings, since jobs and application of an engineering education is more abundant.
Then forget it, my case is that god is an empty word to me, for me it has no meaning. That's why i don't capitalise. And i'm really interested in physics, job opportunities come later, when the economy get's back up.
That is fine, that just makes you a fool(someone that says foolish things and makes foolish decisions). Remember, fools are wise in their own eyes.
About finding a job, talk to the history, phychology, and english majors. Jobs are not as easy to get as it seems. There are always jobs in education I suppose. My point is that engineering is applicable and the majority of industry jobs go to engineers.
Ad hominems aren't that helpfull, i'm no fool, and neither are you since you are an engineer. Look, you shouldn't feel insulted just because someone capitalises a word or not, there are worse things to feel insulted over. And thanks for the job advice, but things can change very fast, especially since i still study for at least five more years.
Intelligence has nothing to do with foolishness. There are smart fools, and wise stupid people. I am not offended, I am just pointing out that a foolish person would offend people when not necessary.
that didnt really seem to explain the big bang to me (im 14). but i liked the music, it was good but didnt get in the way which any of my thinking (if there was any)
n't know what classes you chose to follow (maths and physics or languages), but in the next few years you'll get increasingly complicated subjects, and you'll understand it more since it increases your level of thinking.
Sorry if this has been answered already but where did the energy (photons) come from?
scottbob103 1 week ago
to claim as a FOOl not matter before the big bang is INSULTING as the UNiverse is full of matter and the known Universe just a cloud in it... you follow fools off cliffs of stupidity and BAD MATH!
I hold all 3 theories above the Big bang now number 4 in any kind of theory credibility
! It is 4rth
I hold the correct model of the Universe pre and post
Peterwhitlock 2 months ago
OPlease do not start with LIES!
The Big bang is the 4rth in theories where 2 singularities FLY BY and mix tails of gas that follow them. 2nd is the direct hot of 2 singularities dead on at high speeds. 3rd is the spiral in of 2 singularities to make a Jets of gas that then made stars as all of them explain the magical HIGGS , dark energy and string theory to be FALSE and not ever exist as plain physics wins over follies of theories on theories to make fools of us all.
Peterwhitlock 2 months ago
Interesting, cosmology's focus can shift easily when new observations are done, so it might be a viable model.
jantjeislol 6 months ago
The Schmidt inversion tells us a different story.
I tend to believe that one over this, the "old"theory.
Peace.
BlatendCrude 7 months ago
I can't find anything about it on the internet, care to explain to me what it's about?
jantjeislol 6 months ago
@jantjeislol
It's about the theory that the big bang is a continuously proces, more like a "big flow"
Matter get's sucked into a black hole, and comes out the other side, out of a "white hole"
So matter get's sucked from one universe to the other.
BlatendCrude 6 months ago
That was actually a really interesting video! Thanks :)
Thejonnyroyal 9 months ago
you know more about physics than spelling no offense
mypalsatan 2 years ago
None taken, it's not the area of study i'm in. Liked the vid?
jantjeislol 1 year ago
Your overuse of 'obviously' and condescending tone are exactly why those 'creationists' won't listen to you. That and the incredibly annoying music.
sharky444 2 years ago
Condescending? I made it as neutral as possible, but there have been things that were established as truth and observed multiple times, you just can't deny those. Besides the fact that i used pure deductive reasoning, point me any gap i left in and i'll be happy to elaborate.
jantjeislol 2 years ago
please don't respond to this...but...i already knew the theory of the big bang....no my question to you is...where did the energy come from that, i guess you could say, facilitated the big bang? just food for thought. i'll pray for you.
ghostdancer1984 2 years ago
Maybe a bit late, but it's good you ask. Conservation of energy in a closed system is always constant, an important physical law. The universe truly is such a system, since there are no known outside influences on it. The first law of thermodynamics embodies it. Entropy, the second law, would be in trouble if it weren't, since it states how part of energy you convert is lost to the environment.
jantjeislol 2 years ago
I am impressed you can disprove the 2nd law of thermodynamics by saying that things were different before the big bang. You totally lost credibility for me. Also it is "God" and "gods", notice the subtle capitalizations.
trtaylor98 2 years ago
I suspect you have no idea what that law actually embodies, so don't even start on credibility. And why do you think i spel god like the way i do, shouldn't be that hard to figure out.
jantjeislol 2 years ago
@jantjeislol
I hope my engineering degree gave me some insight/credibility to thermodynamics. Blatant disrespect, by the lack of capitalization, does not prove any points, just shows foolishness/ignorance.
trtaylor98 2 years ago
I've started an education in physics at the university and we've just studied thermo, so it is rather accurate. And care to explain how not capitalising is disrespectfull? Do you capitalise when typing about the flying spaghetti monster? Since that is of equal status as other religions.
jantjeislol 2 years ago
I dont understand the spaghetti monster example, and how it relates to religion. By not capitalizing God, it shows disrespect to what other believe in by claiming that God is at the level of a god. A god being something like money, Zeus (capitalized), ect.
Side note, you may want to think about switching to one of the engineerings, since jobs and application of an engineering education is more abundant.
trtaylor98 2 years ago
Then forget it, my case is that god is an empty word to me, for me it has no meaning. That's why i don't capitalise. And i'm really interested in physics, job opportunities come later, when the economy get's back up.
jantjeislol 2 years ago
That is fine, that just makes you a fool(someone that says foolish things and makes foolish decisions). Remember, fools are wise in their own eyes.
About finding a job, talk to the history, phychology, and english majors. Jobs are not as easy to get as it seems. There are always jobs in education I suppose. My point is that engineering is applicable and the majority of industry jobs go to engineers.
trtaylor98 2 years ago
Ad hominems aren't that helpfull, i'm no fool, and neither are you since you are an engineer. Look, you shouldn't feel insulted just because someone capitalises a word or not, there are worse things to feel insulted over. And thanks for the job advice, but things can change very fast, especially since i still study for at least five more years.
jantjeislol 2 years ago
Intelligence has nothing to do with foolishness. There are smart fools, and wise stupid people. I am not offended, I am just pointing out that a foolish person would offend people when not necessary.
trtaylor98 2 years ago
omg, i am subscribing to you just cause of the music on your videos!
TheSniffyClock 2 years ago
that didnt really seem to explain the big bang to me (im 14). but i liked the music, it was good but didnt get in the way which any of my thinking (if there was any)
H0rizon1 2 years ago
n't know what classes you chose to follow (maths and physics or languages), but in the next few years you'll get increasingly complicated subjects, and you'll understand it more since it increases your level of thinking.
jantjeislol 2 years ago