Added: 3 years ago
From: kaypee1985
Views: 119,449
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (140)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Yes, but they are called Divergent (.) and Rotor or Curl (x) respectively

  • Is that dot product and cross product in 4:23 (the • and x)???

  • Like this if you see boobs in the videos list on the right ========>

  • walter lewin!!!

    

  • E:everything

    

  • A shot in the light!...GOD/1=E

  • 8:30 - Eat your heart out, Mr. Anderson.

  • he talked fast in 1:21

    xD

  • 4:15

    

  • I found out how to unify the forces but am not going to tell anyone because it is too hard for anyone else to understand but me.

    Sorry guys, maybe if you find my notebook someday after I'm dead you'll see (that is, after the rest of the world progresses to my IQ level on average, so in about 10 centuries).

  • @dontmatter0001 unify the forces l0l

  • INSPIRING FREE FALL OFF OF HORRIBLE CGI BUILDING :D

  • Gosh, isn't scary that anything from space could fuck up our planet. lol

  • I find it hard to believe this dude came up with all that in such a "relatively" short amount of time. This dude was not human. I actually thinks he comes back every so often to shake up the world. He probably found fire back in the day.

  • Is Brian Greene "the One"?

  • okay i thought light was the fastest thing in the universe, now this video is saying that gravity is as fast. others are saying that gravity is faster. what is the correct answer????

  • @WOGI5M gravity can't be faster than light as the speed of light is a speed limit

  • The clip doesn`t mention Theodor Kaluza.

  • "Four very simple equations" <.< mmmhmmm.

  • @NoxiousNova I study physics and believe me, they don't get much more elegant than that.

    Have a go at the Schrödinger equation, I DARE YOU.

  • @NilsMcCloud I know it's more complex than the average F=ma, but really, it's not too complicated. It only took me about thirty seconds and I got it all.

  • Can somebody help me? I am confused about the bending special fabric visualisation, and it pulling things down to eart, because wouldnt the motion in that metaphor only work if there was gravity in that metaphor??

  • @tuigleven this is a poor representation of what actually happens in the bending of space time but its the best example we can use because there is really nothing else like it that we can compare to so try not to think to hard about it just get the main point that space time is bent by large masses

  • 4:15. That shit on the bottom is freaking fast! maybe faster than gravity and light..!

  • I have the code, formula of everything, 1=0, and reverse

  • One person doesn't want to crack the code of the universe.

  • I know im responding to an old comment here.. but--

    pure mathematics was not his strong suit. it took him years to learn the riemannian geometry well enough to apply it the way he needed for his theory of GR.. SR's mathematics are utter simplicity compared to GR--about 7 years studying the geometry alone, not to mention having access to the best experts in the world.. SR was genius in simplicity, GR genius in complexity--both raised the bar.. like Jordan's dual 3-peats w/ the Bulls in 1990's

  • it is quantum space that is curved because of its density.

    space-time is only a math model

    time is numerical order of change

  • it is so easy! EM+G :P atoms have electrons that causes G i think :P

  • One master equation is not possible.

  • Those scientist unify different forces, whilst i try to unify beer and peanuts.

  • I don't like this respresentation of space-time as a fabric where each planet is sinking into it. Wouldn't it be better represented as a haze where it's thicker where gravity is strongest and thinner elsewhere? The sounds effects and editing is blergh too.

  • GO MAXWELL GOOOOOOOOOOO!! woot woot!!

  • Doesn't this mean that Earth is slowly approaching the Sun? I mean picture the marble in Casinos.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • that's it, i'm off to pray for God to send me a scientist to marry!! these guys r hot! *drools

  • @TonPappa dont hate. r u jealous? u r arent u

  • @bellacinderellakk no... just completely random.

  • @bellacinderellakk

    trollolololololol

  • so amazing

  • Comment removed

  • 3:40 Yes......and you will die before telling the others of your discovery

  • what stops the earth from going closer in towards the sun?

  • Can someone answer me, what about the speed of electromagnetism and strong nuclear force?

  • @nelsyeung electromagnetism is the phenomena we call "light" we only see part of the spectrum but the electromagnetic spectrum encompasses radio waves, microwaves, UV rays, X rays.... its the electromagnetic spectrum... which is the propagation of electric field and magnetic field perpendicular to eachother and direction of propagation. the strong nuclear force is a force and once again this is clarified in this discussion, forces dont have speeds.

  • @wramy88 Electromagnetic "force" is not light, you are confused with the electromagnetic spectrum. It's how an electron could repel another electron, or attract a proton. Strong nuclear force is a force, gravity is also a force, gravity travels at speed of light, what about strong nuclear force? If it doesn't have a speed then it broke relativity? The 3 forces can be defined by messenger particle, but it doesn't tell us how fast it travels.

  • @nelsyeung ok but you asked "what is the speed of electromagnetism" and taken literally, you basically asked "what is the speed of light" so I answered you. As for speeds of forces, well that doesn't make any sense since forces do not have speeds, the effects of forces can be measured but not by speed, directly. I think I understand what you're asking and I don't have an answer, but I do think if you learn more about these forces you can ask more relevant questions.

  • @nelsyeung I don't understand where you learnt that electromagnetism is light. Forces doesn't have a speed is false shouldn't listen to gcse science, probably half of the things are false. If forces happen instantaneously, as Einstein said, that will break relativity. But yes hopefully when I get back uni, We will study a bit more in forces.

  • @nelsyeung

    That's why we have electric fields, gravitational fields, force fields.

    Mathematically it's a region of space where each point, has a defined vector to it.

    Physically it's the means which the elemental particles (if you wish to call them that) propagate through the field, without surpassing the speed of light.

    Force - object interactions do not occur. Force - Field -objects interactions do.

    That way, the speed restriction is maintained.

    Same applies to SN force.

    Hope it helps.

  • If 3 dimensions of space and single dimension of time bond together as a single fabric of space time, then it is just like a scroll as it was mentioned in the Quran 1400 years ago. Looks like a carpet and can be rolled. I am not sure if this verse refer to this theory.

    Quran:

    [21.104] On that Day, We shall roll up the heaven like a written scroll is rolled. As We originated the first creation, so will We bring it back again. This is a binding promise on Us which We shall assuredly fulfill.

  • @SwaZonKai Well, your scroll should have 4 dimensions... The fabric is just everybody's interpretation. The real interpretation lies in it's complex tensor mathematics.

  • @SwaZonKai Cool story bro.

  • @SwaZonKai:

    Yeah, everything is in your quran.

    I could interpret Alice in Wonderland in some way to get the speed of light.

    Try to look for a cake recipe in your quran, I'm sure you'll find it.

  • that was terrible cgi....

  • @flyfrog49 Well maybe if they had the budget of a blockbuster movie they could have done better... but this is about the par as far as cgi goes for documentaries.

  • Maxwell equations are just amasing as the Einstein general relativity ones.

  • @InitialDAmine True. And Einstein would have nothing without them.

  • 1:31..Is that bob marley's uncle?

  • No it´s Barry White

  • @MrMurdock35 ..Oh yes, more like barry white

  • I think we will never get to the origin with the aid of a mind that operates in the realm of time (past-->present-->future). In this state, mind is nothing more than thoughts. The answer is in a timeless state. And it can only be reached by perception, not by thoughts.

    By the way, my view is tentative and i dont assert anything

  • @ryahul: I have rarely encountered so much wisdom, spoken in such an elegant and precise way. U must be in esotericism

  • @Karampa7 ..Thank you. No, i am not into esotericism. In fact i'm not into any 'ism'. May be esotericism happens to be in me but with that i'm not really concerned. But thanks again for your comment

  • @ryahul My friend, I m sorry if I suggested in such an arrogant way that "u must be in esotericism".I didn't mean anything by that. I lately believe that the truth,the 1 truth,the absolute truth,sleeps inside each 1 of us no matter what. But, if u haven't read the books I have then, I truly envy u. You must be natural, u must be able to perceive what I read in books & understand mainly by logic.But what stroke me the most, was your politeness. Polite people make the world a better place to live!

  • aaaaaa

  • poor einstein..why did he die..poor old man:(..

  • Err ......why did I get thumbs down on my last (3 months) comment?? Did I offend anybody?

  • Because Einstein had a Phd in Physics when he created his theories. You are simply very wrong.

  • My appologies. I was very wrong, but now I know. He is a mathematician and a physicist.

  • First of all, he's not a physician. He's a physicist. Second, coffee is spelled with two F's.

  • lol

  • Because they scientists creating the LHC at CERN totally aren't thinking outside the box.

  • @btrueeth actually einstein was really bad at math (his wife did all the math)

  • Not so. He was good and she was bad at Math. And she died before him and he did most of the work by himself.

  • @btrueeth shit, i was told a different story =P ok, thx i guess

  • no..he was bad at school math..its not the same thing..

  • All right all right. He was both a mathematician and a physicist. Duh sorry.

  • Great

  • loololol like the ege said so interesting

  • so intresting

  • These videos are amazing. They really helped me understand Gravity.

  • Jeez this is so stupid, everyone knows what the grand unified theory is. It`s the Matrix: a simulated reality created by sentient machines in order to pacify and subdue the human population while their bodies' heat and electrical activity are used as an energy source. Scientists Andy and his transsexual brother Larry/Lana Wachowski discovered this in 1999.

  • all great people have great moustaches. and we all know with great moustaches comes great responsibility

  • Hitler and Josef Stalin were great people? lol

  • they also did not use their moustaches wisely, with all that responsibility they just crumbled under the pressure and became bad people. this has repeated through history, we knw this thru fossil evidence of moustaches, we can see that some people misused their great responsibilities and became bad people, hitler and stalin is jus one of many, just another statistic.

  • hitler and josef stalin wer both great shitbags

  • hitler's wasn't great, it is still ridiculed today

  • True point gee :)

  • The problems arise with double-sided moustaches and placing them symetrically with respect to the nose. Both the problems arise from convention, and they can be avoided with planning and a fresh outlook.

  • indeed gamesbok is correct... he is unequivically enlightened in the art of moustachery. only the moustachions of the highest order know this fact, may i ask how you have acquired such information?

  • An unanticipated earthquake when trimming my own Dali-esque facial hair lead me too enlightenment.

    The resulting asymetry has saved me from becoming First Secretary of the Communist party of the USSR, or indeed a short, dark Austrian with a sense of destiny.

    Barbers with Parkinsons, or indeed accidents with camping stoves can save the world from dictatorship and oppression.

  • hahahahahahah best conversation i have ever seen on youtube

  • @leshark ..Haha! Nice!

  • @leshark Discrimination against women?

  • I love Einstein's hair =D

  • I had an idea just 5 minutes ago...and I'm only 15 so i may be WAY OFF..but hear me out..i was thinking about warp drive. so i thought of space-time distortion. whereas to distort space-time so that it shrunk (similar to that of near a gravitational field). but i realized that gravity itself could not create such a distortion to even make a difference. There's also another snag: infinitesimal mass (via energy conversion e=mc^2). if anyone has any comments, I'm really interested to hear..thanks!

  • The fact is that its possible, and thought of... however yes, it would require the energy of a billion suns and that would be a large problem...

    another problem would be that you'd have to jump across the shrunk space instead of going through it, otherwise, it would be as if nothing happened at all

  • Yes, you can warp space, and time. Black holes do it. The point is not the great mass, but the great mass in a small area.

  • you tube the bestttttttt

  • You're an idiot. If you had ever bothered to learn anything about Einstein, you'd know that he did not believe in God.

  • God was a metaphor he used many times when talking about physics laws but he didn't believe in god.

  • It wasn't a metaphor. Einstein was a pantheist, like Spinoza, believing God and Nature were the same thing.

  • not really, he wasn't religious, i do agree with that, but he definately believed in an intelligent designer of the universe, think about this quote:

    "My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble mind." A. Einstein

  • "It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it."

    -Albert Einstein

  • So he doesn't believe in personal God, but does believe in God.But anyway, why is that a reference of anyones personal opinion or faith? Why?

    I have my own opinion about the God which cannot be disproved.

    So what is the point of his quotations? To show that there is no God or that he is not personal, just because one individual think so?

  • and gween...wen einstein tslks about god..he doesnt mean in a religious sense..i.e.oh shit i dont understand this..hey why bother lets jus its god....he means god as in knowing evrything

  • ok chopperpls explain how a:) u can be a psycopthatic 'genius'...and b:) how come trhis 'genius' didnt understand atomic bombs...such a flawed argument...

  • Yes Hitler was the most influential man of the last Century. Germany was the Physics God and America, the Neurological god. Wich is the Puppet master Behind the puppets.

  • Einstein and Hitler were from same dust

  • yes... they were... we are ALL stardust... same as me... same as YOU...

  • Scientist confirmed that there was always an energy before the universe was formed and that energy is eternal! Sound like something? or should I say SomeONE! That's right! God and Science go hand in hand! most of the great Scientists like Einstein did not deny God, instead they worked to learn more from him!

    That is why the universe is elegant, that is why its so beautiful! it warms our hearts with love and joy.

  • Einstein was not reffering to god literally. Einstein's sense of god is not the same with yours. Science do not presuppose god at all. God for science is a worthless assuption.

  • Come on man, be an intelligent about this.

    For the sake of the survival our species, eh?

  • the comment was meant for a creationist

  • ahhh, k

  • The way hitler could manipulate millions of people, he had the magnitude of a ceasar. And the power of a semigod. And that comes from someone that's part black and israelian.If he had good intentions he could bring the whole world together peacefully. Making it a new world order and then he would be the antichrist of course

  • Awesome!!

  • Albert Enstien is the most important person of twentieth century, diffinately not Hitler...

  • Einstein was awesome, pure genius.

  • Hitler was a brilliant man, he could've gone so much further if he would've used his knowledge for good instead of evil

  • hitler was a dumbass, his plans were stupid

    so dumb his own staff rebelled and tried to assassinate him

  • Hitler was a psychopathic genius. The only flaws in his plan were when he stopped bombing Britian and he turned and backstabbed the Ruskies. Hitler, a man with zero regard for life, attacked a country lead by Stalin, a man with even less regard for life!!!

    Hitler would be proud to see that he lost to such good opponents today, the US and Russia with their ICBMs. We combined our knowledge of nukes and the Germans' knowledge of rockets to make ICBMs.

  • Hitler never trule understood the sheer power and destruction behind nuclear bombs, which is why he invested more towards guided missiles, A.K.A. the V-1 and V-2 rockets.

    Still, Hitler could've pulled it off, easily. If he would've attacked Japan, we would've sided with him and attacked the Communist U.S.S.R. and the Japs, who attacked us.

    Either way, America would've come out on top somehow.

  • hitler was already loosing when you intervined

  • Comment removed

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more