Lots of people speak about end of the world, but i think that the human will destroy it by himself, no need of planet x, nibiru, the pole inversion, or alien invasion.
The atomik bomb is well able to do that, when a fool will have the idea of doing that, it will be a matter of time before others do the same, and it will be a awful time and hurt for the human race.
That's why all countries should abondon that imediatly whithout concessions.
There is too much hatred in this world... Yes, SOME of the Japanese at that time in their military bombed Pearl Harbor. And yes, SOME of the Americans at that time in their military A-Bombed Japan. That does not mean this hatred should carry over. Both of those who participated, especially the ones who had the ideas to do such are the wrong ones, NOT THE ENTIRE NATION OF PEOPLES! NOT ALL AMERICANS ARE HATEFUL AND NOT ALL JAPANESE ARE HATEFUL! SOME FOLKS NEED TO STOP DREDGING UP THE PAST HATE!!
@TheAkatsuki10 The song, the sentiments, are not anti American. Both sides did awful things. The song and lyrics are anti war and the pollution of the psyche that this caused to all of humanity. This what we should never forget.
WHEN TRAGEDIES DON’T TEACH A LESSON TO THE LEADERS OF HUMANITY, HUMANITY MUST END SUCH TRAGEDIES ONCE & FOR ALL BY OVERTHROWING SUCH LEADERS & THE SYSTEM THAT PRODUCES THEM!
Japan brought the U.S. into the war. The U.S. wanted peace, but japan attacked pearl harbor instead. Japan shouldn't make itself out to be the victim, just because they chose the WRONG country to FUCK WITH.
@OfficialMJDamage you can't fight a war alone and in the end the USA used the atombomb. No one is to blame. It just shows that war is shit, and a bunch of humans are shit.
We can say "fuck this and fuck that" all we want but it doesn't solve anything, and it hasn't solved anything.
Compassion is important. The people who bombed Nagasaki and Hiroshima had no compassion. The people who firebombed Japanese cities had no compassion. Christians, Muslims, Jew, Hindus and others who follow dogma have no compassion. We need to develop compassion and refuse to kill, refuse to enlist in the terrorist armies of the west.
The residents of Nagasaki were more than acquiescent when China was thrown into turmoil and the women of Korea raped and the children of the Philippines slaughtered. So, reap what you sow, pal...
If any of you had any brains you'd be saying "fuck LEADERS!!!" or better, fuck ambivalence...
Some people say that this song is out of date, that we no longer live with the threat of nuclear war....the world is a safer place than it was thirty years ago.
Those people are wrong. Whilst super powers still have nuclear deterrents this nightmare could happen again....at any time...minute....second.
i find this very hard to watch, but i do, i bet those fuckers would love to drop one one various sites in afghanistan and be done with it...thanks tony blair...we are the 53rd state.
hey, if they would have never bombed nagasaki we would never of had an end to WW2, ya know what that means?? no world bank...and what else? no IMF? !! OMG nice job amerikkka way t
this song is one of the best ever made....the first time i heard it was the first time i had ever tripped on anything and when i began to peak i saw the destruction of the world, and the death of humanity, and god for what seemed like ages all with this song playing over and over in the background. ABSOLUTELY AMAZING.
nowadays, Nagasaki is a beautiful city. I visited it and was amazed. I have travelled around the globe but I never saw so much and so big butterflies in the wild.
Hi guys, a pulitzer prize winning bio of J. Robert Oppenheimer said that the US bombed Japan to ensure that Russia would not enter the conflict with Japan and then have a claim over it as Russia did over Germany and Eastern Europe. The atomic bomb was not the last bomb of World War II but rather was the first bomb fired in the Cold War. The US knew that Japan was going to surrender. Japan was trying to make terms, and wanted its emporer to stay as the head of the country, when bomb dropped.
@Inzect1001 U.S. casualties for an invasion of japan would've been around 1million. I don't know about you but 150,000 people is better than 1 million. The japanese would not surrender to anything less than the thought of absolute destruction. Check out unit 731 and see what the sick fucks were doing to people in labs during ww2
@Hopglock Ok, I don´t know how you guys r thinking. I believe US have started this conflict in the beginning to make sure they stimulate the economy as all wars US go into. With no US in the world, we would be able to establish peace on earth. All the conflicts US go into are built on lies and corruption with insanely much money as interest. They believe they are head over everyone else and if someone fight back they hide and push a botton...
@Inzect1001 Wait.. you're actually telling me that you think the U.S. started WWII?
Open a history book buddy. Your country (Sweden) sat on its ass during ww2 and did nothing while Germany took over Europe. You should be thanking god the U.S. got into the conflict and helped end the war or you'd be hailing the fuhrer right now.
@Hopglock - I learned that in 5rd grade.. Sweden don´t need to make any conflicts, we have nothing to win on a war. But US make money on war, that´s why they interfere in all conflicts of the world. And if they have any interest of a country with no war, then they make a conflict and think they can come in like heroes to "rescue" and "free" the people. We have many countries suffering of war that US don´t give a sht about, because there are no economic interest. Read between the lines.
@Inzect1001 It's not about making conflicts, millions of innocent people were dieing in concentration camps around Europe and Sweden did nothing. Yes, the United States profited from world war 2, the booming industry war creates will stimulate any economy but the fact of the matter is the axis powers had to be stopped because it was the right thing to do and America did it.
Having said that, no matter what 'system' you fancy, there are a lot of brainwashed people out there. Obstacles to peace and progress - wetting the lips of any modern day tyranny.. .
...What about a hiearchy of knowledge, as opposed to our current hiearchy? Where those highest, the implementors actually work for the people.
With the doors of knowledge open to anyone actually wanting knowledge. [The simple, non questioning worker of this society would likely be the same simple, non questioning worker in any society]
The only person officially recognized as having been twice in the bull's eye of atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki has died.
Peace bell rings for Japanese citizens killed in World War II.Tsutomu Yamaguchi, aged 93, passed away Monday. He had been hospitalized since November for stomach cancer.
The problem with anarchy is that some people will always fuck it up, we need to remember a lot of people are naturally greedy and violent and will try to contol and exploit others. Remember what happened during the reign of terror after the french revolution. Not everyone is disciplined enough to function in a less structured society. They will try to create a government if it isn't there.
I support people who live by anarchist principles, but not everyone is able to function by them.
the most beatifull part about anarchy is complete self-judgement and no laws.
The whole point is that the whole society will be working together, otherwise it wouldn't work and whoever opposes that society will be terminated.
There will still be a country-wide forum to which people from every region will send their deputies to agree on major events, yet the deputies will only be allowed to vote in a forum after people of their region had a referendum on a subject voted.
Yeah, and what if one region has a famine. And a near by region has food but only enough for it's people. Are the starving people not going to raid the other group? You gotta think about that stuff. You also need to think about how difficult it'll be to coordinate people to work together with out hirarchy.
I actually know anarchist squatters who've gotten into really bad fights over territory, IN ONE SQUAT!
Anarchy can work for some people, but not a large group. Power is too alluring.
@whitetrashoutlaw I think that anarchy, much like Communist-derivative systems, will not work until our society has developed to the point that we have left that "natural greed" behind, much like society has developed from religious to secular (in many aspects), I think we may develop from ego-centric to more "communal", it will take time though, I doubt any of us will see a "properly" functioning anarchist system as long as we live.
This is very true, but the main reason behind this is because everyone is a child. As the years go by and technological advancements burst forth , we forget that we must develop ourselves as human beings , instead we turn into lurching jackasses feeding off technology and making everything easier for ourselves. What will be left for the next generation? or the generation after that? we are a selfish generation, and the system makes us so , we blindly accept.
@whitetrashoutlaw So just like the current democratic capitalist model then? Anarchism is simply the removal of power from systems. You run a society as a cooperative rather than a dictatorship. Bottom up, not top down!
@whitetrashoutlaw Being willing to be responsible for their own shit you mean? That's why laws were first invented; because of people who wouldn't, couldn't give a toss etc. The exploiters. I don't know how possible it is to live by anarchist ideals these days, unless you're homeless.
@whitetrashoutlaw that is very true but what till happen to is they will simply die. the selfish and ignorant will die will the smart and strong will live a happy and a more free life.
@whitetrashoutlaw The French revolution, not for a moment was an anarchist revolution. Anarchy will come when it is not thought of as anarchy. Permaculture is anarchy yet no one in PC thinks of it as that. If we think of the chaos theory then we can see that in nature we have anarchy which is order. When we create a diverse forest, we have anarchy, the Tagari property in Australia is a wonderful example of that. From anarchy we sprung. Question is what will facilitate that again? Think peak oil.
@whitetrashoutlaw it's our job to create a new man. everything is a process and human nature in fact is not static. We'll try to rid ourselves from everything feudalism and capitalism has offered to our conscious development, we have to surpass it in order to make anarchism work.
@whitetrashoutlaw to become a big anarchist society there will be a long way of learning.cause to be free is like walking. but in a system you arent free,and no authority will teach you how to walk. so you must try it on your own, very difficulty
The committee for public safety was the birth of totalitarianism. I don't understand why the rise of centralized state power dismisses the desire for an absence of state power, if anything it reinforces it. Most fascists were democratically elected, it is precisely the centralization of power that is the problem.
@whitetrashoutlaw I agree, but I believe it was Michael Parenti who theorized that because mankind has outgrown religion (which is a form of authority), we will eventually outgrow government and selfish human nature altogether. It's an interesting concept.
I saw this band a couple of times,the first time I saw them it was one of the best punk gigs ever,at the astoria in edinburgh,anybody remember that venue?
I was fortunate enough to see Crass live on a number of occasions and even now 30 years later the memories of those gigs dosnt fade,The sheer power of the message encased within a few chords changed my life forever,Now my elder children have reached a stage in there lives were they have also chosen not to pay The Man!
I never understood why the US had to bomb CITIES in 1945. They could have at least dumped one on the mountains first to scare the Japs. Bombing Naga. and Hiro. should have been the last of all resorts.
@saintsaens21 Ye we considered it but wen they began jumping off cliffs and killing themselves and family, thats wen we didnt know wat to expect next wen we would get to Japan. They scared us b4 we could try to just scare them. we tried to get them to surender but let us persecute their emperor for war crime but we ended up goin against our word with Russia and nd letting the emperor live. Then we started using them as test dummies to see if the atom affect would kill us all.
@saintsaens21 The reason we had to the japanese wouldnt have stoppred no matter what their culture is based around the idea of death and that it is honorable and the japanese knew that with the atomic bomb they all would have died with out fighting.
@saintsaens21 They bombed Hiroshima on august 6th. No reply from japan so they dropped the second on Nagasaki on the 9th. You don't think 3 days was long enough for a response?
@Hopglock - I don´t understand your problem. You defend US all the times. Isn´t the atomic bomb proof enought for you to see US is sick. In war you should find the people responsible and attack them, not wipe out a hole city of innocent people. US didn´t do anything on the attack on Pearl Harbor even if they knew the coming attack, just to have a excuse attacking Japan. But we could discuss this forever..
@Inzect1001 I'm not arguing that dropping the atomic bombs wasn't a terrible thing, but it was the most logical decision. As i have previously stated lives lost on both sides were reduced because of it. And you're logic on the attack on pearl harbor is seriously flawed. I don't see how you put the blame for the attack on pearl harbor on the U.S. Another country attacks us and were supposed to take it and smile? The United States is in no way perfect but on this particular issue you are wrong.
If they had dropped it on a mountain, how would they have satisfied their morbid curiosity of what happens when you nuke a populated area, or the effects on people? Irony being if they had not done it all the people involved with creating/testing the bombs would have died from cancer and they would have found out.
@saintsaens21 Lol, dumped one on the mountains? The Japanese had a mentality of die before surrender the only thing that was going to get them out of that fear was something that actually hurt them.
@saintsaens21 the human always is going to choose destruction because is easier in this world the goods are better than people that make no sense but no body cares,so AHAIMDADMDAHKAKDAAAMEEANANANA and choose people first : )
@saintsaens21 i guess they wanted revenge of the Pearl Harbor incedint.... i do not support the Nuclear bomb, but when you think about it... the nuclear bomb has ended the war. but than again i dont approve of it..
Hiro, the us was expecting the Japanese to surrender, they didnt . as a result a bomb was supposed to be dropped on a air base, but the plane had only enough fuel, and visibility was bad, they had to be able to see the base, so they choose another site, naga. not saying i like the bombs but that is the history. plus bombing the mountains would have done nothing. and what about pearl harbor? the Japanese destroyed that. it was a retaliation.
@Redn9787 Um, my dad was at Pearl Harbor, on one of the Naval ships that was targeted, and lived to tell the tale ('til 1998). I hardly think it can be equated with nuclear attack! Hiroshima was acceptable, MAYBE, but the Nagasaki bombing was definite overkill.
@noobishdumbberry You guys missed my rather doubtful "MAYBE." I was trying to get my point across to a guy that actually thought that the Nagasaki bombing was an appropriate response to Pearl Harbor (!!) so I was attempting to put some sugar on the pill for him, y'know? Yer preachin' to the choir, telling ME that nukes r' bad. Seriously.
@oibobbo Dont you think the only way anachy could happen is if all the anachists could take a break from the endless squabling and hair splitting an get some stuff done. I personally thought that was pretty much proven by 1939. If the lesson hasnt sunk in, in 70 years. . .
@FrankLeeDeRainged there is no such thing as anarchist. everyone lives by a governing system and to call yourself an anarchist is taking away from the very principal of anarchy. you cant force anarchy you can only force a subversion of state and government.
's funny y'know but all the Anarchist collectives I've ever been involved with have had one thing in common, whether we were in a city squat or mountain commune. There was shit to be done, like digging toilets and there were people sitting around arguing about the post-Marxist significance of the spade. Think I'm too old for this thread but on you go, knock your self out mate
communism is about people. but there is lot of difrent kind of communisms like anarchocommunism, marxismi, leninismi, stalinismi, maoisim well the two last ones are about the leader not about party or people
@WANGZOOMZIP thats not true COMMUNEism is about the greater good of the community, but there are different types of communism that have been created over the years. none of which work. there are always going to be people that want a higher social status and therefore a classless system will never work.
@jdmdrift i almost agree with that all the way.but there is a community that has no classes in europe.i ferget the name ill look it up and email if you want.
Lots of people speak about end of the world, but i think that the human will destroy it by himself, no need of planet x, nibiru, the pole inversion, or alien invasion.
The atomik bomb is well able to do that, when a fool will have the idea of doing that, it will be a matter of time before others do the same, and it will be a awful time and hurt for the human race.
That's why all countries should abondon that imediatly whithout concessions.
tatianaf1000 1 month ago
Oh come on... if you think you've built the most powerful bomb in the world you gotta try it out right? ;)
KaL976 2 months ago
yeah dead fathers, mothers, children, grandmas and grandpas. what a heroic and "necessary" act of fucked up violence.
just like the bombing all over germany.
there is no good against bad in war only fascist leaders and loser victims.
khoroshoorange 2 months ago
@khoroshoorange fuck da krauts
landsharkgo80 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dont fuck with the USA!
Farshad1975 3 months ago
Crass to this day is still relevant, and speak only the truth.
ADDX182 3 months ago
This song is a bit frightening.
But Crass is GENIUS.
juliabadoolia 4 months ago in playlist YouTube Mix for Crass
There is too much hatred in this world... Yes, SOME of the Japanese at that time in their military bombed Pearl Harbor. And yes, SOME of the Americans at that time in their military A-Bombed Japan. That does not mean this hatred should carry over. Both of those who participated, especially the ones who had the ideas to do such are the wrong ones, NOT THE ENTIRE NATION OF PEOPLES! NOT ALL AMERICANS ARE HATEFUL AND NOT ALL JAPANESE ARE HATEFUL! SOME FOLKS NEED TO STOP DREDGING UP THE PAST HATE!!
TheAkatsuki10 6 months ago
@TheAkatsuki10 The song, the sentiments, are not anti American. Both sides did awful things. The song and lyrics are anti war and the pollution of the psyche that this caused to all of humanity. This what we should never forget.
jimbonner1964 6 months ago
NO MORE *!*
19dingo76 9 months ago
FIGHT WARS NOT WAR
rsvpunx 9 months ago
FUCK THE USA AND THE FUCKED UP LEADERS WHOS INTERESTS ARE ONLY FOR SELF PROFIT YOU THINK THEY ACTUALLY GIVE TWO SHITS ABOUT PEOPLE DYING
rsvpunx 9 months ago
I wonder which retarded warmongers dropped those bombs......ah yes it was them
tamaria6564 10 months ago
NAGASAKI NIGHTMARE is possibly the most nerve-jangling sonic nightmare ever recorded, a god damn fucking masterpiece.
LENTICULARPLASTIC 10 months ago 3
WHEN TRAGEDIES DON’T TEACH A LESSON TO THE LEADERS OF HUMANITY, HUMANITY MUST END SUCH TRAGEDIES ONCE & FOR ALL BY OVERTHROWING SUCH LEADERS & THE SYSTEM THAT PRODUCES THEM!
Krasnovoin 10 months ago
@Krasnovoin Yeah, that would be nice, wouldn't it?
StateTheSmash 10 months ago
@panzerfausto...common sense isn't as common as some might like to believe...
zedkitty 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@panzerfausto...common sense isn't as common as some might like to believe...
zedkitty 10 months ago
@panzerfausto...common sense isn't as common as some might lke to believe...
zedkitty 10 months ago
Crass is more then a punk band. It's the musical cultivation of tragedy.
joeyvanderkaay 10 months ago
@joeyvanderkaay Crass is poetry I'd say..
ANBratlie 9 months ago 2
no more nuclear anything......
zedkitty 10 months ago
@zedkitty including nuclear family in that?
panzerfausto 10 months ago
@panzerfausto oh of course
zedkitty 5 months ago
Comment removed
negatory250 10 months ago
FUKUSHIMA nightmare, today.
and the worst part is that this time they bombed themselves with their capitalism.
leravachol 10 months ago
@leravachol you are a fucking idiot
seagbb 10 months ago
I dislike the contents of this video because its facts.How could I like such horrors.
We must put a STOP TO IT
bernieowen2 10 months ago
the crass!!!punk anrk00000!!!!!!!!!
unas de las pokas bandas ke tenian awante!!
1rancidpunk 11 months ago
SHITTY SOUNDTRACK U FUCK, GET A LIFE, FUCK WAR
ACDC444444 11 months ago
The "Enola Gay" didn't drop on Nagasaki, thier target was Hiroshima.
The "Bocs Car" was the aircraft, with a different crew, that hit Nagasaki.
Nagasaki has an incredible museum - worth the trip to Japan; I defy you to walk through it with dry eyes ; ( It will break your heart
cadams2006 11 months ago
i aint racist at all - i hate racism but the usa were pure bastards for wot they did to the japanese innocent people :-(
MultiAli68 11 months ago 2
Japan brought the U.S. into the war. The U.S. wanted peace, but japan attacked pearl harbor instead. Japan shouldn't make itself out to be the victim, just because they chose the WRONG country to FUCK WITH.
OfficialMJDamage 11 months ago
@OfficialMJDamage you can't fight a war alone and in the end the USA used the atombomb. No one is to blame. It just shows that war is shit, and a bunch of humans are shit.
XlebenverbotenX 11 months ago
fucking nips deserved every bit of that nuke. fuck slanty eyed japs and all the rest. fuckin gooks.
Mike9162 11 months ago
@Mike9162
Hopefully You'll die a slow and painful death. Just like some of the innocent victims of Hiroshima, children among them.
JaEuerMeister 11 months ago
@JaEuerMeister - i agree with u
MultiAli68 11 months ago
@JaEuerMeister ASSHOLE
charlyjonas09 6 months ago
@Mike9162 Why listen to Crass? With a comment like that.
PerceptionOfTheDoors 11 months ago
i always hated their long ass ntros...badass song tho
jassholeroxcox44 1 year ago
We can say "fuck this and fuck that" all we want but it doesn't solve anything, and it hasn't solved anything.
Compassion is important. The people who bombed Nagasaki and Hiroshima had no compassion. The people who firebombed Japanese cities had no compassion. Christians, Muslims, Jew, Hindus and others who follow dogma have no compassion. We need to develop compassion and refuse to kill, refuse to enlist in the terrorist armies of the west.
41seppo 1 year ago
i can imagine going there after the bomb exploded and i played "I don't want to set the world on fire" by the Ink Spots
naxxramas1onclubpeng 1 year ago
The residents of Nagasaki were more than acquiescent when China was thrown into turmoil and the women of Korea raped and the children of the Philippines slaughtered. So, reap what you sow, pal...
If any of you had any brains you'd be saying "fuck LEADERS!!!" or better, fuck ambivalence...
ne3nayu 1 year ago 8
@ne3nayu
fuck authority.
fuck people who give them self the right to make decisions about what is and isn't killed.
FissionNonStop 1 year ago
@ne3nayu Leaders are followed voluntarily. Government officials force people to follow them.
Clendmike 2 months ago
Comment removed
ne3nayu 1 year ago
Thanks for the flutes to me given in bankk - Kali gat 1990
bluenail90 1 year ago
See Steve Ignorant in No More Propaganda, 77 minute DVD.
sidandzillah 1 year ago
Like you all, crass are washed up sell outs. FRUADS!
Shame on you all... and on me for believing.
freeseedring.nl
redora222 1 year ago
I just love this anti war song!!!!!!
muziekdoosje1 1 year ago
Some people say that this song is out of date, that we no longer live with the threat of nuclear war....the world is a safer place than it was thirty years ago.
Those people are wrong. Whilst super powers still have nuclear deterrents this nightmare could happen again....at any time...minute....second.
jerrycrow66 1 year ago
This is some creepy stuff. :o
Incredible.
Arkannen 1 year ago
i find this very hard to watch, but i do, i bet those fuckers would love to drop one one various sites in afghanistan and be done with it...thanks tony blair...we are the 53rd state.
swampdodger33 1 year ago
if the would have never bombed nagasaki then we wouldnt have this dope ass song p.s. i love listening to this song high
retsilalister 1 year ago
Anarchy is a temporary and the step of rebuilding. It is not long lasting.
aquateen53 1 year ago
lol stupid japs
cookiemonstaman1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
At war,the humans are all sadihistics beasts
moneygoodmoney 1 year ago
At war,the human are all sadihistics beasts
moneygoodmoney 1 year ago
hey, if they would have never bombed nagasaki we would never of had an end to WW2, ya know what that means?? no world bank...and what else? no IMF? !! OMG nice job amerikkka way t
capablekel 1 year ago
anarchy is soooooo cliche punk garbage.
stupid idea
510punx 1 year ago
Check out BURNT CROSS on youtube (uk anarcho punk) if you like Crass style
cramphound 1 year ago
this song is one of the best ever made....the first time i heard it was the first time i had ever tripped on anything and when i began to peak i saw the destruction of the world, and the death of humanity, and god for what seemed like ages all with this song playing over and over in the background. ABSOLUTELY AMAZING.
coconutfever123 1 year ago
Yanqui,shit!
peaceandlove1225 1 year ago 2
nowadays, Nagasaki is a beautiful city. I visited it and was amazed. I have travelled around the globe but I never saw so much and so big butterflies in the wild.
gre68 1 year ago
anarchy is just a word like hello or sponge it dont change lives
whocares44044 1 year ago
@whocares44044 not with an attitude like yours it dont.
cromlek 1 year ago
Will this be happened to NORTH KOREA if it not declares War to USA???
MrVrsilvestrejr2008 1 year ago
crass feels like the only real band I've heard.
4455matthew 1 year ago
Hi guys, a pulitzer prize winning bio of J. Robert Oppenheimer said that the US bombed Japan to ensure that Russia would not enter the conflict with Japan and then have a claim over it as Russia did over Germany and Eastern Europe. The atomic bomb was not the last bomb of World War II but rather was the first bomb fired in the Cold War. The US knew that Japan was going to surrender. Japan was trying to make terms, and wanted its emporer to stay as the head of the country, when bomb dropped.
dynamicdynamic1 1 year ago
thos gook bastards should have surrendered , its war ppl will die !!! bout time for the Nukes to come back out !!!!!!
brownoman 1 year ago
i remember gettin this single and being totally amazed....punk innit !!!!
SCOTSPUNKBOY 1 year ago
fuck bush
fuck reagan
fuck truman
fuck kapitalism
fuck the u.s.a.
Crass FTW
Merzbowxnoise 1 year ago 22
@Merzbowxnoise Yeah, and f@#%k you too, goober.
gotch09 1 year ago
@Merzbowxnoise and fuck issrael / fuck Zionism/ fuck Simon Peres / fuck Benjamín Netanyahu FUCK ASSASSINS.
Crass FTW
condoridecano 1 year ago
@condoridecano
and fuck Hitler / fuck Stalin / fuck war and fuck hate
Crass FTW
Merzbowxnoise 1 year ago 25
@Merzbowxnoise
beautiful
YunaBonbeurre 1 year ago
@Merzbowxnoise fuk ya motha
juniorspilatro 1 year ago
@juniorspilatro
learn writing.
Merzbowxnoise 1 year ago
@Merzbowxnoise i kno how to rite retard , i choose to spell like that
juniorspilatro 1 year ago
@Merzbowxnoise Fuck communism, Fuck socialism, fuck statism, fuck idiotism
MaikUniversum 1 year ago
@Merzbowxnoise I agree sir!
adrianamit27 1 year ago
@Merzbowxnoise
you have a stain on your Nike (made in china) shoes, dude
YunaBonbeurre 1 year ago
''NEVER LISTEN TO A PEACEFUL MAN WITH A GUN IN HIS HAND AND AN ATOMIC BOMB IN HIS BACKYARD!!'' This sentence says everything that needs to be said!
mandrilijanka 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
Inzect1001 1 year ago
USA is sick and will always be!
Inzect1001 1 year ago
@Inzect1001 Isnt every country?
insaneperson7766 1 year ago
USA is the only country in the world that have used nuclear bombs on other people, what I know.. That shows how far the are willing to go..
Inzect1001 1 year ago 2
@Inzect1001 U.S. casualties for an invasion of japan would've been around 1million. I don't know about you but 150,000 people is better than 1 million. The japanese would not surrender to anything less than the thought of absolute destruction. Check out unit 731 and see what the sick fucks were doing to people in labs during ww2
Hopglock 1 year ago
@Hopglock Ok, I don´t know how you guys r thinking. I believe US have started this conflict in the beginning to make sure they stimulate the economy as all wars US go into. With no US in the world, we would be able to establish peace on earth. All the conflicts US go into are built on lies and corruption with insanely much money as interest. They believe they are head over everyone else and if someone fight back they hide and push a botton...
Inzect1001 1 year ago
@Inzect1001 Wait.. you're actually telling me that you think the U.S. started WWII?
Open a history book buddy. Your country (Sweden) sat on its ass during ww2 and did nothing while Germany took over Europe. You should be thanking god the U.S. got into the conflict and helped end the war or you'd be hailing the fuhrer right now.
Hopglock 1 year ago
@Hopglock - I learned that in 5rd grade.. Sweden don´t need to make any conflicts, we have nothing to win on a war. But US make money on war, that´s why they interfere in all conflicts of the world. And if they have any interest of a country with no war, then they make a conflict and think they can come in like heroes to "rescue" and "free" the people. We have many countries suffering of war that US don´t give a sht about, because there are no economic interest. Read between the lines.
Inzect1001 1 year ago
@Inzect1001 It's not about making conflicts, millions of innocent people were dieing in concentration camps around Europe and Sweden did nothing. Yes, the United States profited from world war 2, the booming industry war creates will stimulate any economy but the fact of the matter is the axis powers had to be stopped because it was the right thing to do and America did it.
Hopglock 1 year ago
Comment removed
Inzect1001 1 year ago
@insaneperson7766 Nooo.. US is fcked up, and you know that.
Inzect1001 1 year ago
God Bless America!
mycreature 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
but I hate the United States of America, and here in Brazil fuss that shit!
grungeasyouare 1 year ago
but I hate the United States of America, and here in Brazil fuss that shit!
grungeasyouare 1 year ago
I hate the U.S.A. motherfucks Freedon in the wold ? Country of shit, will be fighting for freedom right?
grungeasyouare 1 year ago
Comment removed
robtheslayer100 1 year ago
The horror. The horror.
romansseven 1 year ago 9
Having said that, no matter what 'system' you fancy, there are a lot of brainwashed people out there. Obstacles to peace and progress - wetting the lips of any modern day tyranny.. .
koscheii666 1 year ago
...What about a hiearchy of knowledge, as opposed to our current hiearchy? Where those highest, the implementors actually work for the people.
With the doors of knowledge open to anyone actually wanting knowledge. [The simple, non questioning worker of this society would likely be the same simple, non questioning worker in any society]
koscheii666 1 year ago
dying in a nuclear blast looks fun i want to die that way!
renormalize99 1 year ago
The only person officially recognized as having been twice in the bull's eye of atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki has died.
Peace bell rings for Japanese citizens killed in World War II.Tsutomu Yamaguchi, aged 93, passed away Monday. He had been hospitalized since November for stomach cancer.
r.i.p.
yuryiodizadebee 1 year ago 2
The problem with anarchy is that some people will always fuck it up, we need to remember a lot of people are naturally greedy and violent and will try to contol and exploit others. Remember what happened during the reign of terror after the french revolution. Not everyone is disciplined enough to function in a less structured society. They will try to create a government if it isn't there.
I support people who live by anarchist principles, but not everyone is able to function by them.
whitetrashoutlaw 1 year ago 37
the most beatifull part about anarchy is complete self-judgement and no laws.
The whole point is that the whole society will be working together, otherwise it wouldn't work and whoever opposes that society will be terminated.
There will still be a country-wide forum to which people from every region will send their deputies to agree on major events, yet the deputies will only be allowed to vote in a forum after people of their region had a referendum on a subject voted.
KingFedya 1 year ago
Yeah, and what if one region has a famine. And a near by region has food but only enough for it's people. Are the starving people not going to raid the other group? You gotta think about that stuff. You also need to think about how difficult it'll be to coordinate people to work together with out hirarchy.
I actually know anarchist squatters who've gotten into really bad fights over territory, IN ONE SQUAT!
Anarchy can work for some people, but not a large group. Power is too alluring.
whitetrashoutlaw 1 year ago
you're a retard. as in really stupid.
reedisamonk 1 year ago
@whitetrashoutlaw Finally someone who said it short and clear! Cheers and gj for that! :)
mandrilijanka 1 year ago
@whitetrashoutlaw I think that anarchy, much like Communist-derivative systems, will not work until our society has developed to the point that we have left that "natural greed" behind, much like society has developed from religious to secular (in many aspects), I think we may develop from ego-centric to more "communal", it will take time though, I doubt any of us will see a "properly" functioning anarchist system as long as we live.
Arachon 1 year ago
@whitetrashoutlaw
This is very true, but the main reason behind this is because everyone is a child. As the years go by and technological advancements burst forth , we forget that we must develop ourselves as human beings , instead we turn into lurching jackasses feeding off technology and making everything easier for ourselves. What will be left for the next generation? or the generation after that? we are a selfish generation, and the system makes us so , we blindly accept.
Svensjair 1 year ago
@whitetrashoutlaw nice
DjCINEMA 1 year ago
@whitetrashoutlaw So just like the current democratic capitalist model then? Anarchism is simply the removal of power from systems. You run a society as a cooperative rather than a dictatorship. Bottom up, not top down!
jollyjarvis 1 year ago
@whitetrashoutlaw true dat
TheBlitz1 1 year ago
@whitetrashoutlaw
capitalism rules!!!
luigithunders 1 year ago
@whitetrashoutlaw Being willing to be responsible for their own shit you mean? That's why laws were first invented; because of people who wouldn't, couldn't give a toss etc. The exploiters. I don't know how possible it is to live by anarchist ideals these days, unless you're homeless.
msbevking 1 year ago
@whitetrashoutlaw that is very true but what till happen to is they will simply die. the selfish and ignorant will die will the smart and strong will live a happy and a more free life.
robisgangsta1 1 year ago
@whitetrashoutlaw The French revolution, not for a moment was an anarchist revolution. Anarchy will come when it is not thought of as anarchy. Permaculture is anarchy yet no one in PC thinks of it as that. If we think of the chaos theory then we can see that in nature we have anarchy which is order. When we create a diverse forest, we have anarchy, the Tagari property in Australia is a wonderful example of that. From anarchy we sprung. Question is what will facilitate that again? Think peak oil.
ninyae 1 year ago
@whitetrashoutlaw If there is a thing like human nature, people would still be livin in caves... point is, change is possible.
iYok0 1 year ago
@whitetrashoutlaw Exacly,people ruin everything,starting with the garden of eden.They even fuck up mythology such as that.
exeuroweenie 1 year ago
@whitetrashoutlaw i agree 100% ive been saying that all these years
howlingmongoose 1 year ago
@whitetrashoutlaw it's our job to create a new man. everything is a process and human nature in fact is not static. We'll try to rid ourselves from everything feudalism and capitalism has offered to our conscious development, we have to surpass it in order to make anarchism work.
seigneurvoland666 1 year ago
@whitetrashoutlaw
Your right, but try to remember the biggest issue for anarchists is not necessarily government, but social hierarchy.
On another note, panarchism seems to be a valid enough idea, if anyone reading this hasn't heard of it already I suggest looking it up.
SaeringVircolac 1 year ago
@whitetrashoutlaw to become a big anarchist society there will be a long way of learning.cause to be free is like walking. but in a system you arent free,and no authority will teach you how to walk. so you must try it on your own, very difficulty
(hope you understand me^^ greetings from germany)
zinon7777 1 year ago
@whitetrashoutlaw
Fuck off you stupid cunt. Have you not listened?
adeworks 1 year ago
@whitetrashoutlaw
The committee for public safety was the birth of totalitarianism. I don't understand why the rise of centralized state power dismisses the desire for an absence of state power, if anything it reinforces it. Most fascists were democratically elected, it is precisely the centralization of power that is the problem.
nestor68811 1 year ago
@whitetrashoutlaw I agree, but I believe it was Michael Parenti who theorized that because mankind has outgrown religion (which is a form of authority), we will eventually outgrow government and selfish human nature altogether. It's an interesting concept.
xXxrokoutloudxXx 1 year ago
@whitetrashoutlaw
Democracy will always be a sinlge step from tyranny, the only thing that stands in between is anarchy.
BoredYouthCrew 1 year ago
Chilling what happened. Thanks for keeping it in our consciousness. We need to never forget this kind of mistake and evil.
ilovegoth 1 year ago
Heres sumthin to chew on.anarchy in itself is a governing rule,thus it is null.but chaos is unpredictable and that is what i follow.
shukketsushi 1 year ago
I saw this band a couple of times,the first time I saw them it was one of the best punk gigs ever,at the astoria in edinburgh,anybody remember that venue?
theneil100 1 year ago
courtesy of the existencil press
sunyate 2 years ago
I was fortunate enough to see Crass live on a number of occasions and even now 30 years later the memories of those gigs dosnt fade,The sheer power of the message encased within a few chords changed my life forever,Now my elder children have reached a stage in there lives were they have also chosen not to pay The Man!
MsBabster 2 years ago 4
holy shit good for them!!
CollieLover23 2 years ago
I never understood why the US had to bomb CITIES in 1945. They could have at least dumped one on the mountains first to scare the Japs. Bombing Naga. and Hiro. should have been the last of all resorts.
saintsaens21 2 years ago 10
its because the government is, and always has been, a big group of murderers.
MorshuTheFacekicker 2 years ago
@saintsaens21 they didnt want to scare, they were making a point to the whole world " we have this bomb and we WILL use it"
jdmdrift 1 year ago
Indeed. Massacre first, talk later. Kinda reminds me of Al Qaeda's tactics.
saintsaens21 1 year ago
@saintsaens21 Ye we considered it but wen they began jumping off cliffs and killing themselves and family, thats wen we didnt know wat to expect next wen we would get to Japan. They scared us b4 we could try to just scare them. we tried to get them to surender but let us persecute their emperor for war crime but we ended up goin against our word with Russia and nd letting the emperor live. Then we started using them as test dummies to see if the atom affect would kill us all.
Daze528 1 year ago
@saintsaens21 The reason we had to the japanese wouldnt have stoppred no matter what their culture is based around the idea of death and that it is honorable and the japanese knew that with the atomic bomb they all would have died with out fighting.
insaneperson7766 1 year ago
@saintsaens21 they wanted to show how big there dicks were to the russians
TheKingkongsdingdong 1 year ago 2
@saintsaens21 They bombed Hiroshima on august 6th. No reply from japan so they dropped the second on Nagasaki on the 9th. You don't think 3 days was long enough for a response?
Hopglock 1 year ago
@Hopglock - I don´t understand your problem. You defend US all the times. Isn´t the atomic bomb proof enought for you to see US is sick. In war you should find the people responsible and attack them, not wipe out a hole city of innocent people. US didn´t do anything on the attack on Pearl Harbor even if they knew the coming attack, just to have a excuse attacking Japan. But we could discuss this forever..
Inzect1001 1 year ago
@Inzect1001 I'm not arguing that dropping the atomic bombs wasn't a terrible thing, but it was the most logical decision. As i have previously stated lives lost on both sides were reduced because of it. And you're logic on the attack on pearl harbor is seriously flawed. I don't see how you put the blame for the attack on pearl harbor on the U.S. Another country attacks us and were supposed to take it and smile? The United States is in no way perfect but on this particular issue you are wrong.
Hopglock 1 year ago
@saintsaens21 the japanese would have just kept fighting military experts reckoned 2 million allied troops could have been lost
1960unclemort 1 year ago
@saintsaens21
If they had dropped it on a mountain, how would they have satisfied their morbid curiosity of what happens when you nuke a populated area, or the effects on people? Irony being if they had not done it all the people involved with creating/testing the bombs would have died from cancer and they would have found out.
queever 1 year ago
@saintsaens21 you're stupid
luigithunders 1 year ago
@saintsaens21 'Cause they are America . What that county represents is so egocentric, with a might equals right attitude, it couldn't be wrong.
msbevking 1 year ago
@saintsaens21 basically, its because theyre cunts.
cromlek 1 year ago
@saintsaens21 Lol, dumped one on the mountains? The Japanese had a mentality of die before surrender the only thing that was going to get them out of that fear was something that actually hurt them.
CatsClause101 1 year ago
Comment removed
laucha789 1 year ago
@saintsaens21 the human always is going to choose destruction because is easier in this world the goods are better than people that make no sense but no body cares,so AHAIMDADMDAHKAKDAAAMEEANANANA and choose people first : )
laucha789 1 year ago
@saintsaens21 Awe, Is baby mad?
Allstars619caseypwns 1 year ago
@saintsaens21 i guess they wanted revenge of the Pearl Harbor incedint.... i do not support the Nuclear bomb, but when you think about it... the nuclear bomb has ended the war. but than again i dont approve of it..
essa8abbas 1 year ago
@saintsaens21 they wanted to stop the war as fast as possible and not risk their own lives atom bomb is stupidiest idea ever
munggipossu 1 year ago
@munggipossu The Japanese where already trying to negotiate surrender! USA wanted to send a message to Russia.
busa1999 1 year ago
@busa1999 lol nagasaki / hiroshima was bad, but the rape of nanjing was 10 times worse
Monatee 1 year ago
@munggipossu They killed thousand of innocent people. Atom bombs are more than the stupidest idea ever
noobishdumbberry 1 year ago
@saintsaens21 after the first bomb on
Hiro, the us was expecting the Japanese to surrender, they didnt . as a result a bomb was supposed to be dropped on a air base, but the plane had only enough fuel, and visibility was bad, they had to be able to see the base, so they choose another site, naga. not saying i like the bombs but that is the history. plus bombing the mountains would have done nothing. and what about pearl harbor? the Japanese destroyed that. it was a retaliation.
Redn9787 1 year ago
@Redn9787 Um, my dad was at Pearl Harbor, on one of the Naval ships that was targeted, and lived to tell the tale ('til 1998). I hardly think it can be equated with nuclear attack! Hiroshima was acceptable, MAYBE, but the Nagasaki bombing was definite overkill.
LeshaAnn 1 year ago
@LeshaAnn Mass extermination as a means to an end is NEVER acceptable!
jerrycrow66 1 year ago
@jerrycrow66 Protest the creation of nuclear weapons. Don't let the motherfuckers kill us off as pawns.
noobishdumbberry 1 year ago
@LeshaAnn By no means is any death by nuclear war acceptable. Innocent people were killed away like pieces of trash
noobishdumbberry 1 year ago
@noobishdumbberry You guys missed my rather doubtful "MAYBE." I was trying to get my point across to a guy that actually thought that the Nagasaki bombing was an appropriate response to Pearl Harbor (!!) so I was attempting to put some sugar on the pill for him, y'know? Yer preachin' to the choir, telling ME that nukes r' bad. Seriously.
LeshaAnn 1 year ago
@LeshaAnn Of course. I wasn't going against what you said. I was saying what i wanted to say.
noobishdumbberry 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
first off. the song sounds like something south park would think up against whatever their message is.
shock tactics do not add meaning to a goof in war policy..
therefore the video is unnecessary and cruel to watch
Abortive 2 years ago
the only way anarchy could happen, is by itsself,to impose it would contradict its fundamental principle.
not many people want anarchy unfortunately and those few won't impose it so it' unlikely it'd happen soon...
oibobbo 2 years ago
@oibobbo Dont you think the only way anachy could happen is if all the anachists could take a break from the endless squabling and hair splitting an get some stuff done. I personally thought that was pretty much proven by 1939. If the lesson hasnt sunk in, in 70 years. . .
FrankLeeDeRainged 2 years ago
well i don't have much hair so i have to split it to get enough
oibobbo 2 years ago
@FrankLeeDeRainged there is no such thing as anarchist. everyone lives by a governing system and to call yourself an anarchist is taking away from the very principal of anarchy. you cant force anarchy you can only force a subversion of state and government.
jdmdrift 1 year ago
's funny y'know but all the Anarchist collectives I've ever been involved with have had one thing in common, whether we were in a city squat or mountain commune. There was shit to be done, like digging toilets and there were people sitting around arguing about the post-Marxist significance of the spade. Think I'm too old for this thread but on you go, knock your self out mate
FrankLeeDeRainged 1 year ago
communism is about people. but there is lot of difrent kind of communisms like anarchocommunism, marxismi, leninismi, stalinismi, maoisim well the two last ones are about the leader not about party or people
DudeDoingYourMom 2 years ago
man made power! man made pain!
27oropeza 2 years ago
Communism only shifts the power to less people. Nothing about communism is about the people, it is only about the ruling party.
WANGZOOMZIP 2 years ago
@WANGZOOMZIP thats not true COMMUNEism is about the greater good of the community, but there are different types of communism that have been created over the years. none of which work. there are always going to be people that want a higher social status and therefore a classless system will never work.
jdmdrift 1 year ago
@jdmdrift i almost agree with that all the way.but there is a community that has no classes in europe.i ferget the name ill look it up and email if you want.
shukketsushi 1 year ago
Communism works very well in theory, but in actual practice generally fails due to human nature.