Looks impressive. Hopefully the Egyptians will see it up close. I never understood why israel gave up the Sinai. The Sinai gave Israel strategic depth, plus new land for development.
Lets be honest with ourselves. Arabs and Jews will never get along. As Israel's population grows it will need more land. And the Sinai would of been perfect, a large, relatively unpopulated piece of land.
and yet, somehow, the tank still remains in service throughout the world.
the simple fact is that despite the claims of some people, the truth is that tank armor has advance far more effectively then Infantry anti-tank weapons have.
.
on average, a small infantry unit carrying the most advance modern ATGM has considerably LESS chance of knocking out modern tanks then they would have in the 70's
Looks impressive. Hopefully the Egyptians will see it up close. I never understood why israel gave up the Sinai. The Sinai gave Israel strategic depth, plus new land for development.
Mojo1982 1 year ago
@Mojo1982 Peace?
Fitzknight 10 months ago
@Fitzknight
Lets be honest with ourselves. Arabs and Jews will never get along. As Israel's population grows it will need more land. And the Sinai would of been perfect, a large, relatively unpopulated piece of land.
Mojo1982 10 months ago
גבי אשכנזי התותח
Salalala100 1 year ago
what is that on 1:34 ?
T0PGUNGE0 1 year ago
@T0PGUNGE0
a counter IED explosive.
it spreads over an area and detonates, taking out any IED (or idiots) that happen to be around.
.
its a street cleaner.
lahavhaelohim 1 year ago
warfare changed small infantry unit can disable all these tanks if equipped with the right weapons .nothing new
Cage71 1 year ago
@Cage71
thats not "warfare changed"
thats been the case since the 70's.
.
and yet, somehow, the tank still remains in service throughout the world.
the simple fact is that despite the claims of some people, the truth is that tank armor has advance far more effectively then Infantry anti-tank weapons have.
.
on average, a small infantry unit carrying the most advance modern ATGM has considerably LESS chance of knocking out modern tanks then they would have in the 70's
lahavhaelohim 1 year ago
It was only a technology demonstrator.
defenseupdate 1 year ago
Too bad they didn't show off the Battlehawk
Briggs1700 1 year ago