I've been trying to figure out what 's the name and who makes this missile. the penetration logistics is quite impressive, since it enters the ship from the back what implies the ship's propulsion mechanism is destroyed and in doing so rendered, useless.
A lot of people think that the ship needs to be sunk or they mention that it's still afloat. Lets just say; try checking your email after something like that hits you.
This is nothing. Indian ships are equiped with the Barak point defence missile system which can easily handle Pakistan's anti-ship missiles. However India's navy is equiped with the supersonic Brahmos anti-ship missile which travels at Mach 2.5. Even the U.S navy has no answer to this. Not even the vaunted Aegis system can stop it. The missile travels so fast that no warhead is even needed. The kinetic impact alone causes catastophic damage. Only Russia & India possess this missile. Jai Hind!
You are right. I was just trying to show that Pakistan's imported crappy Chinese anti-ship missiles is no match for India's Hypersonic anti-ship cruise missiles. I was dealing on with surface ship realm. Nevertheless your point is right. This is why China is deploying boomers at a scary pace. In response India inducted its first indigenous boomer and is going to induct a Akula II Hunter-Killer.
There is one big problem with the BrahMos missile. It relies on the United States satellites to guide the missile to its target. A matter of fact, last year during a test the BrahMos missile missed its target because U.S. satellites "blinked" during the test window. Was this done on purpose? I don't know but it goes to show you that the BrahMos missile is useless without U.S. Satellites. This missile has not effect against the U.S. forces.
Again. India and U.S are friends and "allies". I was just trying to show what India was capable of deploying against Pakistan using U.S systems for a gold standard comparison. But you should know that India is a partner in the Russian GLONASS satellite navigation system which will be as robust as GPS by 2015 at which point India will no longer need GPS for network-centric warfare systems like Brahmos. BTW for now all nations except Russia are dependent on GPS. EU Galileo is not up & running yet.
I know, I wasn't trying to start a fight, I have nothing against India. However, maybe the Russian GLONASS satellite sysem will be as robust as GPS by 2015 but that's assuming that the U.S. doesn't make any improvements to their system. I guess we will have to wait and see. As for the EU Galileo, it will probably never work because the European governments just waste time arguing amongst themselves about who will get the contracts and who will pay for what.
A stationary undefended ship hit by a sub-sonic missile!!! Hardly a real war like scenario. In an actual war a CIWS system like Kashtan, Phalanx or Goalkeeper would have easily shot down such a slow moving missile.
That's scary-looking. Obviously a warning shot meant for India.
But it doesn't look much different in capacity to our own Harpoon missile. If I can recall, we sold Harpoons to the Pakistanis back in the 80's. India has bigger and meaner weapons that they've bought from Russia since then, so I doubt that this scared them much.
US ships do have defences against many missiles it's true but as I said they can't really defend against C-802 missiles which are equipped with anti-phalanx systems eg small radar reflectivity
Go to Global Security and/or FAS and read about it
Also almost all US ships use a newer variant that allows the interception of missiles that are not emitting any radar signals, this technology has been around for a bit.
That's nice but you said "C-802 missiles which are equipped with anti-phalanx systems eg small radar reflectivity"
And what I'm telling you is that all U.S. warships have the Block 1 variant that adds an overall infrared-only guidance system that enables it to intercept missiles that are not emitting any radar signals.
How do you account for Global Security's and FAS's assessment that the C-802 has a hit probability as high as 98% and that "target ships have a very low success rate in intercepting the missile"?
But what are these "targeted ships" they are referring to? Just any or highly advanced ones like the U.S. has? Are they including more advanced anti-missile systems like the RIM-116 Rolling Airframe Missile that also has the infrared-only guidance system?
I don't know for sure. I assume since they are both respected sources they are including ships equipped with those systems. I'm going to email them and ask
You might be interested to know that Hizbullah hit a phalanx armed Israeli ship with a C-802. The Israelis say their phalanx wasn't activated but I don't believe them.
el problema es destruccion del planeta contaminando los mares con sus cohetes, destruyanse asi mismos ,y aran un favor ala humanidad; todos los que fabriquen armas .
@cazyblood3 then he entered office and realized the real world that bush lived in and said, lets use drones to kill terrorists and bomb villages in afghanistan and pakistan......
Comment removed
Jeff12798 6 months ago
I've been trying to figure out what 's the name and who makes this missile. the penetration logistics is quite impressive, since it enters the ship from the back what implies the ship's propulsion mechanism is destroyed and in doing so rendered, useless.
eloidor 8 months ago
That's China love for pakistan!!!
Doraemonchina 9 months ago
Harpoon?
gamekiiid 11 months ago
A lot of people think that the ship needs to be sunk or they mention that it's still afloat. Lets just say; try checking your email after something like that hits you.
TheRantingCabbie 1 year ago
Looks kinda like it breached its hull and slightly cracked it.
indoorin 1 year ago
@indoorin Nvm it broke its back.
indoorin 1 year ago
I want to see several ships fire at once at that thing
supramanz 1 year ago
Ship 2- "Do de do de---OMG WTF!!!"
Scioneer 1 year ago
Is that the same model which struck the Israel ship few years back?
Blazingspitfire 1 year ago
lol anyone can hit a frigate...that has no armor and not ever moving!
Hashuism 1 year ago
Pakistan Zinabad , The region super power Pakistan,
angria2008 1 year ago
Thissar,
Never ever trust the Indians in India.
Bidil6 1 year ago
Yay More war!!!........ sighhhh
Traveler2112 1 year ago
looks like Pakistan will be a real threat to any unarmed and unable to defend themselves ships come near them. lol
hobo59 1 year ago
This is nothing. Indian ships are equiped with the Barak point defence missile system which can easily handle Pakistan's anti-ship missiles. However India's navy is equiped with the supersonic Brahmos anti-ship missile which travels at Mach 2.5. Even the U.S navy has no answer to this. Not even the vaunted Aegis system can stop it. The missile travels so fast that no warhead is even needed. The kinetic impact alone causes catastophic damage. Only Russia & India possess this missile. Jai Hind!
thissar 1 year ago
@thissar The U.S.A does have an answer, they're called submarines.
All navies, regardless of their missile capability are vulnerable to subs and their stealth technology.
rckn4ever 1 year ago
You are right. I was just trying to show that Pakistan's imported crappy Chinese anti-ship missiles is no match for India's Hypersonic anti-ship cruise missiles. I was dealing on with surface ship realm. Nevertheless your point is right. This is why China is deploying boomers at a scary pace. In response India inducted its first indigenous boomer and is going to induct a Akula II Hunter-Killer.
thissar 1 year ago
@thissar
There is one big problem with the BrahMos missile. It relies on the United States satellites to guide the missile to its target. A matter of fact, last year during a test the BrahMos missile missed its target because U.S. satellites "blinked" during the test window. Was this done on purpose? I don't know but it goes to show you that the BrahMos missile is useless without U.S. Satellites. This missile has not effect against the U.S. forces.
SporkFire 1 year ago
Again. India and U.S are friends and "allies". I was just trying to show what India was capable of deploying against Pakistan using U.S systems for a gold standard comparison. But you should know that India is a partner in the Russian GLONASS satellite navigation system which will be as robust as GPS by 2015 at which point India will no longer need GPS for network-centric warfare systems like Brahmos. BTW for now all nations except Russia are dependent on GPS. EU Galileo is not up & running yet.
thissar 1 year ago
@thissar
I know, I wasn't trying to start a fight, I have nothing against India. However, maybe the Russian GLONASS satellite sysem will be as robust as GPS by 2015 but that's assuming that the U.S. doesn't make any improvements to their system. I guess we will have to wait and see. As for the EU Galileo, it will probably never work because the European governments just waste time arguing amongst themselves about who will get the contracts and who will pay for what.
SporkFire 1 year ago
Comment removed
SporkFire 1 year ago
look at the tags for this video.... how can this be described as "militant", the AP is just another Zionist propoganda mouthpiece.
tdot22 1 year ago
A stationary undefended ship hit by a sub-sonic missile!!! Hardly a real war like scenario. In an actual war a CIWS system like Kashtan, Phalanx or Goalkeeper would have easily shot down such a slow moving missile.
16Dec71 1 year ago
yeah like the uss stark. hmmmmm
maunaowakea777 1 year ago
Ships these days are nothing more than sitting ducks. The navy's of the world will become obsolete.
czubspenx 2 years ago
Somebody tell Al Gore the military is leaving a LARGE carbon footprint and need to be taxed for creating global warming!
LuthierGod 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
This was a Pakistan Navy F-22P Frigate firing a C802 missile against another target ship (decoy). It was the target ship that blew up.
ShameelBaloch 2 years ago
Comment removed
ShameelBaloch 2 years ago
Comment removed
ShameelBaloch 2 years ago
That's scary-looking. Obviously a warning shot meant for India.
But it doesn't look much different in capacity to our own Harpoon missile. If I can recall, we sold Harpoons to the Pakistanis back in the 80's. India has bigger and meaner weapons that they've bought from Russia since then, so I doubt that this scared them much.
Groundkisser 2 years ago
It's a good thing Obama is cutting the military.
The one thing government is suppose to do, they cut.
TheLiberalssuckdick 2 years ago
The federal government doesn't have any other responsibilities besides war?
Have you ever actually read the Constitution?
Principalian 2 years ago
@Principalian
Protect you from foreign and domestic fools like you.
That's pretty much 90% of the constitution sumed up for your dumb ass.
TheLiberalssuckdick 2 years ago
I love the fact that I served to defend dumb shits like you. Seriously, read the Constitution. You've got no idea what your country is about.
Principalian 1 year ago
@Principalian
Hey, you would do well as a politician. Good ass liar.
liberals. LOL
TheLiberalssuckdick 1 year ago
can someone tell me ..............how do u fire a missle and blow your self up
mediteranian213 2 years ago
Comment removed
ShameelBaloch 2 years ago
Comment removed
ShameelBaloch 2 years ago
to muterstan with love thats an indian navyship quick piss on it
KASHMIRI7864LYFE 2 years ago
the target ship was like " Iam ready, please come and destroy me" LOL !! Obsolete missiles with subsonic speed don't cut it anymore.
kashsoldier 2 years ago
Missiles are obsolete. Check out Tesla Plasma weapons technology and see the Youtube video called: Scalar Waves 101
ComradePatriot 2 years ago
I think this is the C-802. Very effective. Iran's got thousands of them.
The US has no defence against them afaik
rfalfonse 2 years ago
Comment removed
SporkFire 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rfalfonse
Actually almost all U.S. warships have defense against all sorts of incoming missiles. Most ships have several Phalanx guns on them.
SporkFire 2 years ago
US ships do have defences against many missiles it's true but as I said they can't really defend against C-802 missiles which are equipped with anti-phalanx systems eg small radar reflectivity
Go to Global Security and/or FAS and read about it
rfalfonse 2 years ago
@rfalfonse
And has this been proven in real tests?
SporkFire 2 years ago
@rfalfonse
Also almost all US ships use a newer variant that allows the interception of missiles that are not emitting any radar signals, this technology has been around for a bit.
SporkFire 2 years ago
The C-802 has undergone upgrades that counter the newer US technologies.
If you take a look at the websites I mentioned and other analyzes, the C-802 is still considered superior to US countermeasures
You might want to read:
The Secret History Part II: The C-802 Cruise Missile: How the CIA left the Navy Defenseless against an Iranian Missile
rfalfonse 2 years ago
the iphone is superior to US countermeasures.
GeminiAzules 2 years ago
@rfalfonse
That's nice but you said "C-802 missiles which are equipped with anti-phalanx systems eg small radar reflectivity"
And what I'm telling you is that all U.S. warships have the Block 1 variant that adds an overall infrared-only guidance system that enables it to intercept missiles that are not emitting any radar signals.
SporkFire 2 years ago
OK please link me to some info on the Block 1 versus the C-802
rfalfonse 2 years ago
just search for infrared-only guidance systems.
SporkFire 2 years ago
I did and found nothing.
rfalfonse 2 years ago
How do you account for Global Security's and FAS's assessment that the C-802 has a hit probability as high as 98% and that "target ships have a very low success rate in intercepting the missile"?
rfalfonse 2 years ago
@rfalfonse
But what are these "targeted ships" they are referring to? Just any or highly advanced ones like the U.S. has? Are they including more advanced anti-missile systems like the RIM-116 Rolling Airframe Missile that also has the infrared-only guidance system?
SporkFire 2 years ago
I don't know for sure. I assume since they are both respected sources they are including ships equipped with those systems. I'm going to email them and ask
rfalfonse 2 years ago
I don't know for sure. I assume since both FAS and Global Security are respected sources they are including ships equipped with that system.
I'm going to email them and ask
rfalfonse 2 years ago
You might be interested to know that Hizbullah hit a phalanx armed Israeli ship with a C-802. The Israelis say their phalanx wasn't activated but I don't believe them.
rfalfonse 2 years ago
Iran doesn't need nukes.
Cobalt 60 ...in even the small missiles is enought to killl 8 million fucking slimeball Jews.
AaronShekelsteinn 2 years ago
had to cut loose this subscription the commercials just too distracting
charles98888 2 years ago 7
With all the military bucks spent here, how hard would it have been to place some oil booms around the wreck before it creates the slick?
jsmcguireIII 2 years ago
Now just imagine one of these with a nuke warhead...
That's enough to vaporize an aircarft carrier
The Chinese and Russians(the inventors of these misiles) have these as well.
No,our phalanx system won't stop these as some fly at mach 3
dgl1962 2 years ago
Comment removed
telepylus111 2 years ago
:15 vvhut vvuz dut???
JOS3EMMANUEL 2 years ago
@jos3emmanuel ait git lax, dut wuz bad az !
LOL!
reasoning777 2 years ago
not bad
Tihamah 2 years ago
o man what a head shot ...welldone
warkaDung1 2 years ago
Boom headshot!
CheezyBallsTrippa 2 years ago
el problema es destruccion del planeta contaminando los mares con sus cohetes, destruyanse asi mismos ,y aran un favor ala humanidad; todos los que fabriquen armas .
CHORDE72 2 years ago
around 0:14 seconds does anyone see a object smashing into it?
tutt4 2 years ago
@tutt4 Good call. It looks like it was fired upon.
Firebird7478 2 years ago
AC130 In The AIR !!!
BabybooR33 2 years ago
did the missile go back to them??
nesi987 2 years ago
no a missle probly just exploded inmediatly when they launched it
DlomasterFTW 2 years ago
Looks like the ship held up quite well considering the missile strike.
tradernorton05 2 years ago 10
@tradernorton05
ship was sank in final
2942jack 1 year ago
wow
pubtor 2 years ago 3
wawoooooooooooooooooo
warkaDung1 2 years ago
The Iranians have thousands of these types of missiles.
johnu78 2 years ago
A Way To World Peace
The President stood up to a tumultuous applause
A man who had decided to announce a noble cause
The press were there in numbers and the cameras fought for space
This was a true historic moment for the human race.
"My friends", he said, "our world has seen too much of war and strife.
It's time that we decided to work out a better life.
So this is an announcement that I want you all to hear.
We're going to change the world for all in just one single year.
cazyblood3 2 years ago 3
That is so true soon will will be very happy no more war or lies!!
AQUARIUM1984WTW 2 years ago
Then I woke up.
snowfan 2 years ago
@cazyblood3 let's hope the next US president can go it.
MrSpieldose 2 years ago
@cazyblood3 then he entered office and realized the real world that bush lived in and said, lets use drones to kill terrorists and bomb villages in afghanistan and pakistan......
STILLNAKEDBULLWINKLE 2 years ago
To bad it's unlikely every1 will comply, just because of different ideologie of what is peace and what is best.
DlomasterFTW 2 years ago
Their Never Was and their Never Will be, Peace in the WORLD.
ryen1992 2 years ago
Now thats to India with love.
landwarrior82 2 years ago 2
I wish I had an ocean and a helicopter.
Jimmyjumpnjive 2 years ago 3
i just want a girlfriend
naw i already have a girlfriend
acelafan123 2 years ago
You should have two girl friends ... and the ocean should be my bath tub.
Jimmyjumpnjive 2 years ago
lol
acelafan123 2 years ago
fuck them and iran!!!!
1blade63 2 years ago
fuck u and ur mom!!!!
landwarrior82 2 years ago