@zeb120 my brother im shia. if i pray everday, if i fast everyday of the ramadan month and if i behave me like a true muslim, then im still going to hell?
look my brother, sunnis and shias, both need to stop fighting eachother, we are both MUSLIMS
Achernahr, we have invited you towards Truth. It is up to you. Either you interpret Iran's masonic pyramid parliament as a triangle or you ask ALLAH's Guidance sincerely. I'm sure you are researching more on Iran and its 12th imam.
according to me that particular sect should be the one closest to the Quran and the Sunnah..maybe Ahle Hadees, maybe Salafiyya, maybe Ahlus-Sunnah wal Jamaah or maybe the sect of Taliban which is Deobandi..
There is no such thing as 'legitimate sect', all sects are illegitimate..But the Prophet(pbuh) knew that even though ALLAH(swt) has prohibited it, the Muslims are bound to commit sin and create sects amongst themselves..
Can u give me the names of a few popular Islamic scholars who have justified 9/11?? People like Israr Ahmad, Khalid Yasin, Bilal Phillips or Sheikh Imran Hosein??
Or atleast give one example from the Prophets(pbuh) lifetime where he launched such a massive attack on women and children in their cities without any provocation..not on the battlefield, in cities..only one???
as for the Prophet (saws) - he (saaws) lead attacks himself on the trade caravans of the meccans which were "civilian" military targets trading in wealth stolen from the muslims (just like the wtc towers were trading in stolen iraqi oil wealth while the pentagon placed a blockaid in iraq that killed 1 million muslim children)! shortly thereafter, during the night raids, the Prophet (saaws) said:
It is reported on the authority of Sa'b b. Jaththama that the Prophet of Allah (may peace be upon him), when asked about the women and children of the polytheists being killed during the night raid, said: They are from them.
I never said Qadianis are Muslims..they are indeed apostates and we can very well declare general takfir to the new converts to their sect(but not on ones who are born as a Qadiani)..
The Al-Saud family, being as hypocrite as it is, still has to prevent Qadianis from entering due to the pressure from the Ulema of their country..
so if the qadianis are not muslims - why on earth did u bring it up?? it is b/c u have no idea what your talking about on *most* of the matters u are talking about here...so u use *whatever* argument u can find to cover up for the contradictions in your comments!! it had nothing to do with the discussion of the shia, and it is the same ulema in saudi arabia that is calling on saudia to fight a proxy war with iran in iraq!
moreover, perhaps a minor opinion is correct while the major opinion (of a body of ulema) is incorrect (for they are not prophets - right)? so even if there is an opinion that the shia can go to hajj, that doesn't mean that there aren't apostates, polytheists, and hypocrites from among this group, nor does it indicate that the shia are accepted as a legitimate sect or madhab witin Islam!! so while the shia were allowed into mecca, the Ummah *fought* them over and over during that *same* history!
what sort of a fasadi fool are u?? u know all the hadees which can be used as a bait for justifying Al-Qaeda's actions, but not about the one where the Prophet(pbuh) says that my Ummah would never form ijma over a wrong thing..so follow the main body of Muslims and be not divided amongst yourselves..
Mullah Omar is not a prophet..He is what he is, Amir-ul-Momineen..He has indeed made mistakes like the one of massacring the people of Hazara rather than showing some mercy and bringing them close to the Taliban, and also he made a huge mistake of believing Osama and inshallah he would rectify it as soon as he re-establishes the Islamic Emirate!
of course he isn't. neither are you nilo. so u don't agree with mullah umar on everything. neither do u agree with dr. naik and imran hossein on everything. just be honest and truthful. that is all we are asking of you. likewise we don't agree with you, we don't consider the shia anything more than a cult, and we believe that the fighting and killing of the hazarah was justified (as it is again right now since most of them side with the occupation)!
and all those scholars and even the "caliph" u gave an example of before - regarding the shia being allowed to mecca - they are not prophets either!! and the qadhis believe that the final prophet was not Muhammad (saaws) so i agree that they should not be allowed into mecca, and likewise, i agree that the shia as a whole should be allowed into mecca even though there are many polytheists among them! likewise, kaafirs are currently in charge of saudi arabia, though they go to mecca all the time.
Mashallah! This is all i wanted to hear..that Shias cannot be declared 'Kaafir' as a wholesale rule..unlike many other sects of Qadiani's, Bahai's, Khojas and many more who are known apostates according to the ijma of the scholars..
now that ur stance has softened up towards the Shia, i hope u don't consider that the Iranians can be slaughtered wholesale as many of them are Muslims too..if Bin Laden nukes them now, i hope u are among the first ones to condemn the cultist!
well, according to Dr.Israr Ahmed, another great scholar from Pakistan, the last 3 mujaddids have indeed been from the subcontinent which conforms to the fact that this region would be the platform for the revival of Islam and liberation of Jerusalam!
and I never said Ahmadinejad is the best ruler either..the 2 best rulers known to me are Mahathir Mohammed and Mullah Omar..
When Sultan Al-fateh(ra) was the Caliph, on whom u cannot play ur takfiri card due to the presence of a Hadees about him, Shiasm already had got all the codification it needed..
Still Sultan Al-fateh never prohibited Shias from making the pilgrimage, and this was even after the times of Ibn Taymiya(r)..
shiaism has been changed over and over. the argument here is that who is allowed to hajj has no bearing on who is or is not a Muslim. tomorrow, bin Laden was a khaliph for example, i don't think he would prevent the shia from going to mecca!! did u not listen when i said that not all shia are kaairs?? but at the same time,t hat doesn't mean shiaism is a legitimate sect within Islam. so stop lying and accusing others of playing a "takfiri card" when NO ONE is plroclaiming *general* takfir.
There is no such thing as a 'legitimate sect' within Islam..those who create sects among Muslims are not part of us..
and if u don't declare general takfir, then whats ur problem with President Ahmadinejad then?
He never supported the occupation or war at any stage..he rules by the Quran and Sunnah(known to him)..he has never slandered the Sahaba(at least we have to proofs)!!
but the Qadianis do consider themselves to be pure Muslims and followers of Prophet Muhammad(pbuh)..still they are not allowed in the holy cities unlike the Shia..
so why are they not allowed in the holy cities? and is this historically true or just the reality today with al-saud!? u talked about the consensus of the scholars previously in one of your other arguments. yet, the ijma of the classical scholars is that any who rule by way other than what Allah prescribes is committing shirk. yet, all the leaders of the muslim nations (including the traitor) Musharref are allowed in mecca (which is ruled by kaafirs based on the ijma of the classical ulema)!
thus, this very argument as to who is allowed to go to mecca and who is not has *no* relevance into this discussion. rather, u brought it up as a *desperate* attempt to cover up for all the points u could not defend regarding the shia, their evil, their apostasy, and their shirk. u need to turn off the tv and stop reading articles on politics and instead, start reading books on aqeedah and relearn what tawhid and shirk actually mean.
i can very proudly say that whatever little bit i have learned of Islam from the vast ocean of knowledge, and heard from Sheikh Imran Hosein and Dr.Zakir Naik in their lectures, i agree with them 100%!
Now this dispels all ur stupid accusations..
Can u say this about any known person today other than someone affiliated to the cult of Al-Qaeda??
If not, then search for these answers deep down inside u and stop posting comments of public forums immediately..
no - u are disagreeing with them after using their opinions to defend your points of view even though they were clearly contradictory of one another. u cited the fact that they believe 911 was an inside job while u go around contradicting that view and proclaiming your emnity for bin Laden and seek fitnah between al-Qaidah and the Taliban (the evidence of which is on my channel)! so you are lying *again* by claiming u agree 100% with those scholars. have some self-respect *please*!
their opinions about 9/11 being an inside job is according to their knowledge and Bin Laden's initial denial of having any part in it..I had the same opinion 6 months ago before i saw clear evidence of Bin Laden's involvement and him boasting about it..
Now that i have such knowledge, and against a person like u who too boasts about it, i can clearly remember their sayings that whoever was responsible for 9/11 is a criminal..and u must have already seen Dr.Zakir Naik's video saying the same..
as i said, i am talking about our 1400 year history..don't tell me ALLAH(swt) never allowed any Muslim to take control of Hejaz after the Rashidun Caliphate..
we had Sultan Al-fateh, Muwaiya(ra), Umar Abul Aziz(ra) and many more..
and i guess u don't know, Qadianis and Bahai's are not allowed to enter the holy cites in Saudi Arabia today..they are prevented the govt..
I am against the beliefs of Shiasm too, as i said many times before that it is a misguided sect..but i don't consider them non-Muslims just as Sheikh Imran Hosein pointed out that no Muslim ruler ever prohibited them from making pilgrimage either!
and i can show u videos where Sheikh Imran praises the leaders of the Islamic Revolution of Iran..
one cannot be against shiaims yet count them as a geniune sect. calling them misguided shows that u don't know the reality of the shia, the taqiyyah of the shia (unless u are practicing the same thing), the adultry permitted by the shia, the slander of the shia against the Prophet's family members and friends, the shirk of the 12ers (the largest branch of the shia), and the treason of their past and present. tell me smarty pants, why do the shia always fight the Khalifah?
how can shaykh imran hossein consider the shia non-muslims when he has joined their wakeup project. study the refutations of sufism and the ashari creed to understand imran hossein's background. no muslim ruler ever prohibited nationalists or secularists from making it to hajj either! the role of those who guard mecca and medinah is not make determinations as to who is or is not muslim! how do u think the kaafir women of cnn have made it to mecca during hajj and reported from there??
A shia person has the label on him everywhere he goes..but nationalists and secularists cannot be compared to being Shia or Qadiani..
And i am talking about 1400 years of Muslim rulers of Hejaz..not even a single one prohibited Shia even though most have them have prohibited other sects considered to be outside the fold of Islam..Even Hazrat Muawiya(ra) never prevented this group from entering the holy cities as a rule..
as for your question about imran hossein, lookup his videos here on the shia...and he says he has great respect for those who carried out the iranian revolution, and then he says that his statements about the shia mean to disrespect to the leaders of Iran! this is just him trying to be diplomatic and reach them (i.e. a type of dawah). i more interested in speaking the truth unconditionally as opposed to roger rabbit dawah.
u are sort of a disillusioned person..u live in ur own Al-Qaeda sponsored world..
President Ahmadinejad was the mayor of Tehran in those days..he was not even involved in national policy making..so plz don't just blabber stuff just for the sake of doing it..
And as far as helping America to overthrow Saddam is concerned, that was a good decision as Saddam was a proven munafiq..but Khameini was wrong to back America in Afghanistan..but in either case they pulled out right after regime change..
the day u come out clean and say that u believe Bin Laden was responsible for 9/11 and u back his stupid actions, i bet nobody is gonna watch ur Al-Qaeda sponsored videos..
even Sheikh Imran Hosein and Dr.Zakir Naik think that 9/11 was an inside job and still believe Osama's lie that he was not responsible, just like Mullah Omar fell for it..
shaykh imran hossein is an ashari/sufi cleric who contradicts his own words by backing the shia wup after condemning shiaism (and nice tactic on your part to divert everything i spoke on with regards to Iran and the shia and change the the subject matter - its proof that your taqiyyah has failed). Dr. Naik never gave a definitive answer. he said it *might* have been an inside job, and he said if bin Laden is terrorizing America (the biggest terrorist) - than he is with him!!
Additionally, Dr. Naik maybe saying what he is saying out of personal security concerns (and in this situation - it is even permissible for sunnis to do taqiyyah). after all, if he came out in support of bin Laden...how long do u think it would take the rat-worshipers to put him in jail (just as the kuffar and apostate yemeni apostate government are hunting one of the greatest imams of our time - anwar al-awlaki)??
i don't know whether u and 'halaqah1' work together or not, but he had Sheikh Imran Hosein featuring in most of his videos..and my opinion is the same as of Dr.Zakir Naik and Sheikh Imran Hosein..
If 9/11 had been an inside job as the whole Muslim world thought when Bin Laden initially denied it, Bin Laden would have bin a great hero!
but now that we know he really planned all of it, he has become a criminal and liable for Sharia punishment..
'Spiritual Democracy' is a term given by Allama Iqbal, considered to be the mujaddid of the 20th century, just like Shah Waliullah is considered to be of the 18th century..
Shiasm is indeed a misguided sect, but still they remain Muslims according to the Ijma of the scholars of our times and our predecessors..
I never said any Shia could be the 'best ruler' ever..plz don't cook up lies..i just didn't say that..
its foolish to show videos of Iranians discriminating against Sunnis when even Taliban made the same mistakes against Shias in their rule..
all i said that Ahmadinejad did not support US occupation on any instance..he is firm believer in ALLAH(swt) and his Messenger(pbuh), though i agree he belongs to a misguided sect..
the truth is foolish? you are far and away from Islam, because u lie and practice taqiyyah to the point that u don't even know the difference between reality and the "matrix". the shias are NOT a legitimate part of this ummah, or a real sect, or a true madhab!? but your true colors are now showing (after u avoided answering my ? about your own faith)! shiaism was created by a jew from yemen and has been a constant fitnah within our ummah. their history is one of constatn back-stabbing.
Ah! so now u show ur true colors and declare me to be outside the fold of Islam..and now my blood is halal for u to shed rite?
Brother, this is the takfiri ideology of Osama Bin Laden that allows his conscience to slaughter Muslims and non-Muslims like animals..stay away from all this, or else u would lead urself to eternal doom!
bin Laden is not a takfiri. but takfir was even practiced by the Prophet (saaws) for being a Muslim is not an open checkbook but rather, conditional...and the Quran has specific provisions as to what continues a Muslim, what contradicts the shahadah, and what nullifies Islam. learn just a little bit about aqeedah, fiqh/shariah before u jump into politics and start spreading the "lies" of others regarding fellow Muslims. this will also solve your lack of knowledge with regards to the shia cult.
shias are pitiful and pathetic form of ISLAM full of SHIRK and godlessness
they are muslim copies of pagans
anyone who calls upon Holy Prophet let alone imams and gives them universal status and does grave worshipping rituals is NOT A KAFIR
BUT IS DEFINITELY DEFINITELY HELLBOUND !!!!
ALLAH hafiz
fee aman ALLAH
zeb120 1 year ago
@zeb120 my brother im shia. if i pray everday, if i fast everyday of the ramadan month and if i behave me like a true muslim, then im still going to hell?
look my brother, sunnis and shias, both need to stop fighting eachother, we are both MUSLIMS
peace, take care
76oudorper76 11 months ago
Im so confused
dammee 1 year ago
@nilo723
It won't be Islamic Emirate if Mullah Omar persecute women.
mingalabaa 1 year ago
allahu akbar
Joktani 2 years ago 3
gr8 video
dralsasa77 2 years ago 3
Awesome video.. simply awesome.
Achernahr, we have invited you towards Truth. It is up to you. Either you interpret Iran's masonic pyramid parliament as a triangle or you ask ALLAH's Guidance sincerely. I'm sure you are researching more on Iran and its 12th imam.
ArabianRhythm 2 years ago 13
according to me that particular sect should be the one closest to the Quran and the Sunnah..maybe Ahle Hadees, maybe Salafiyya, maybe Ahlus-Sunnah wal Jamaah or maybe the sect of Taliban which is Deobandi..
There is no such thing as 'legitimate sect', all sects are illegitimate..But the Prophet(pbuh) knew that even though ALLAH(swt) has prohibited it, the Muslims are bound to commit sin and create sects amongst themselves..
nilo723 2 years ago
Can u give me the names of a few popular Islamic scholars who have justified 9/11?? People like Israr Ahmad, Khalid Yasin, Bilal Phillips or Sheikh Imran Hosein??
Or atleast give one example from the Prophets(pbuh) lifetime where he launched such a massive attack on women and children in their cities without any provocation..not on the battlefield, in cities..only one???
nilo723 2 years ago
as for the Prophet (saws) - he (saaws) lead attacks himself on the trade caravans of the meccans which were "civilian" military targets trading in wealth stolen from the muslims (just like the wtc towers were trading in stolen iraqi oil wealth while the pentagon placed a blockaid in iraq that killed 1 million muslim children)! shortly thereafter, during the night raids, the Prophet (saaws) said:
Lone1Wolf9 2 years ago
Book 019, Number 4321:
It is reported on the authority of Sa'b b. Jaththama that the Prophet of Allah (may peace be upon him), when asked about the women and children of the polytheists being killed during the night raid, said: They are from them.
Lone1Wolf9 2 years ago
sehr professionell arbeiten, Bruder
nsuenv 2 years ago
I never said Qadianis are Muslims..they are indeed apostates and we can very well declare general takfir to the new converts to their sect(but not on ones who are born as a Qadiani)..
The Al-Saud family, being as hypocrite as it is, still has to prevent Qadianis from entering due to the pressure from the Ulema of their country..
nilo723 2 years ago
so if the qadianis are not muslims - why on earth did u bring it up?? it is b/c u have no idea what your talking about on *most* of the matters u are talking about here...so u use *whatever* argument u can find to cover up for the contradictions in your comments!! it had nothing to do with the discussion of the shia, and it is the same ulema in saudi arabia that is calling on saudia to fight a proxy war with iran in iraq!
Lone1Wolf9 2 years ago
moreover, perhaps a minor opinion is correct while the major opinion (of a body of ulema) is incorrect (for they are not prophets - right)? so even if there is an opinion that the shia can go to hajj, that doesn't mean that there aren't apostates, polytheists, and hypocrites from among this group, nor does it indicate that the shia are accepted as a legitimate sect or madhab witin Islam!! so while the shia were allowed into mecca, the Ummah *fought* them over and over during that *same* history!
Lone1Wolf9 2 years ago
what sort of a fasadi fool are u?? u know all the hadees which can be used as a bait for justifying Al-Qaeda's actions, but not about the one where the Prophet(pbuh) says that my Ummah would never form ijma over a wrong thing..so follow the main body of Muslims and be not divided amongst yourselves..
nilo723 2 years ago
Mullah Omar is not a prophet..He is what he is, Amir-ul-Momineen..He has indeed made mistakes like the one of massacring the people of Hazara rather than showing some mercy and bringing them close to the Taliban, and also he made a huge mistake of believing Osama and inshallah he would rectify it as soon as he re-establishes the Islamic Emirate!
nilo723 2 years ago
of course he isn't. neither are you nilo. so u don't agree with mullah umar on everything. neither do u agree with dr. naik and imran hossein on everything. just be honest and truthful. that is all we are asking of you. likewise we don't agree with you, we don't consider the shia anything more than a cult, and we believe that the fighting and killing of the hazarah was justified (as it is again right now since most of them side with the occupation)!
Lone1Wolf9 2 years ago
and all those scholars and even the "caliph" u gave an example of before - regarding the shia being allowed to mecca - they are not prophets either!! and the qadhis believe that the final prophet was not Muhammad (saaws) so i agree that they should not be allowed into mecca, and likewise, i agree that the shia as a whole should be allowed into mecca even though there are many polytheists among them! likewise, kaafirs are currently in charge of saudi arabia, though they go to mecca all the time.
Lone1Wolf9 2 years ago
Mashallah! This is all i wanted to hear..that Shias cannot be declared 'Kaafir' as a wholesale rule..unlike many other sects of Qadiani's, Bahai's, Khojas and many more who are known apostates according to the ijma of the scholars..
now that ur stance has softened up towards the Shia, i hope u don't consider that the Iranians can be slaughtered wholesale as many of them are Muslims too..if Bin Laden nukes them now, i hope u are among the first ones to condemn the cultist!
nilo723 2 years ago
well, according to Dr.Israr Ahmed, another great scholar from Pakistan, the last 3 mujaddids have indeed been from the subcontinent which conforms to the fact that this region would be the platform for the revival of Islam and liberation of Jerusalam!
and I never said Ahmadinejad is the best ruler either..the 2 best rulers known to me are Mahathir Mohammed and Mullah Omar..
nilo723 2 years ago
When Sultan Al-fateh(ra) was the Caliph, on whom u cannot play ur takfiri card due to the presence of a Hadees about him, Shiasm already had got all the codification it needed..
Still Sultan Al-fateh never prohibited Shias from making the pilgrimage, and this was even after the times of Ibn Taymiya(r)..
nilo723 2 years ago
shiaism has been changed over and over. the argument here is that who is allowed to hajj has no bearing on who is or is not a Muslim. tomorrow, bin Laden was a khaliph for example, i don't think he would prevent the shia from going to mecca!! did u not listen when i said that not all shia are kaairs?? but at the same time,t hat doesn't mean shiaism is a legitimate sect within Islam. so stop lying and accusing others of playing a "takfiri card" when NO ONE is plroclaiming *general* takfir.
Lone1Wolf9 2 years ago
There is no such thing as a 'legitimate sect' within Islam..those who create sects among Muslims are not part of us..
and if u don't declare general takfir, then whats ur problem with President Ahmadinejad then?
He never supported the occupation or war at any stage..he rules by the Quran and Sunnah(known to him)..he has never slandered the Sahaba(at least we have to proofs)!!
nilo723 2 years ago
but the Qadianis do consider themselves to be pure Muslims and followers of Prophet Muhammad(pbuh)..still they are not allowed in the holy cities unlike the Shia..
nilo723 2 years ago
so why are they not allowed in the holy cities? and is this historically true or just the reality today with al-saud!? u talked about the consensus of the scholars previously in one of your other arguments. yet, the ijma of the classical scholars is that any who rule by way other than what Allah prescribes is committing shirk. yet, all the leaders of the muslim nations (including the traitor) Musharref are allowed in mecca (which is ruled by kaafirs based on the ijma of the classical ulema)!
Lone1Wolf9 2 years ago
thus, this very argument as to who is allowed to go to mecca and who is not has *no* relevance into this discussion. rather, u brought it up as a *desperate* attempt to cover up for all the points u could not defend regarding the shia, their evil, their apostasy, and their shirk. u need to turn off the tv and stop reading articles on politics and instead, start reading books on aqeedah and relearn what tawhid and shirk actually mean.
Lone1Wolf9 2 years ago
i can very proudly say that whatever little bit i have learned of Islam from the vast ocean of knowledge, and heard from Sheikh Imran Hosein and Dr.Zakir Naik in their lectures, i agree with them 100%!
Now this dispels all ur stupid accusations..
Can u say this about any known person today other than someone affiliated to the cult of Al-Qaeda??
If not, then search for these answers deep down inside u and stop posting comments of public forums immediately..
nilo723 2 years ago
no - u are disagreeing with them after using their opinions to defend your points of view even though they were clearly contradictory of one another. u cited the fact that they believe 911 was an inside job while u go around contradicting that view and proclaiming your emnity for bin Laden and seek fitnah between al-Qaidah and the Taliban (the evidence of which is on my channel)! so you are lying *again* by claiming u agree 100% with those scholars. have some self-respect *please*!
Lone1Wolf9 2 years ago
their opinions about 9/11 being an inside job is according to their knowledge and Bin Laden's initial denial of having any part in it..I had the same opinion 6 months ago before i saw clear evidence of Bin Laden's involvement and him boasting about it..
Now that i have such knowledge, and against a person like u who too boasts about it, i can clearly remember their sayings that whoever was responsible for 9/11 is a criminal..and u must have already seen Dr.Zakir Naik's video saying the same..
nilo723 2 years ago
as i said, i am talking about our 1400 year history..don't tell me ALLAH(swt) never allowed any Muslim to take control of Hejaz after the Rashidun Caliphate..
we had Sultan Al-fateh, Muwaiya(ra), Umar Abul Aziz(ra) and many more..
and i guess u don't know, Qadianis and Bahai's are not allowed to enter the holy cites in Saudi Arabia today..they are prevented the govt..
nilo723 2 years ago
I am against the beliefs of Shiasm too, as i said many times before that it is a misguided sect..but i don't consider them non-Muslims just as Sheikh Imran Hosein pointed out that no Muslim ruler ever prohibited them from making pilgrimage either!
and i can show u videos where Sheikh Imran praises the leaders of the Islamic Revolution of Iran..
nilo723 2 years ago
one cannot be against shiaims yet count them as a geniune sect. calling them misguided shows that u don't know the reality of the shia, the taqiyyah of the shia (unless u are practicing the same thing), the adultry permitted by the shia, the slander of the shia against the Prophet's family members and friends, the shirk of the 12ers (the largest branch of the shia), and the treason of their past and present. tell me smarty pants, why do the shia always fight the Khalifah?
Lone1Wolf9 2 years ago
how can shaykh imran hossein consider the shia non-muslims when he has joined their wakeup project. study the refutations of sufism and the ashari creed to understand imran hossein's background. no muslim ruler ever prohibited nationalists or secularists from making it to hajj either! the role of those who guard mecca and medinah is not make determinations as to who is or is not muslim! how do u think the kaafir women of cnn have made it to mecca during hajj and reported from there??
Lone1Wolf9 2 years ago
A shia person has the label on him everywhere he goes..but nationalists and secularists cannot be compared to being Shia or Qadiani..
And i am talking about 1400 years of Muslim rulers of Hejaz..not even a single one prohibited Shia even though most have them have prohibited other sects considered to be outside the fold of Islam..Even Hazrat Muawiya(ra) never prevented this group from entering the holy cities as a rule..
nilo723 2 years ago
as for your question about imran hossein, lookup his videos here on the shia...and he says he has great respect for those who carried out the iranian revolution, and then he says that his statements about the shia mean to disrespect to the leaders of Iran! this is just him trying to be diplomatic and reach them (i.e. a type of dawah). i more interested in speaking the truth unconditionally as opposed to roger rabbit dawah.
Lone1Wolf9 2 years ago
u are not doing dawah at all..what u are doing is spreading fitnah..
Dawah is what Dr.Zakir Naik is doing..
nilo723 2 years ago
LOL, C'mon Achernahr!
Time to awaken from the "Go To Sleep Project".
halaqah1 2 years ago 2
u are sort of a disillusioned person..u live in ur own Al-Qaeda sponsored world..
President Ahmadinejad was the mayor of Tehran in those days..he was not even involved in national policy making..so plz don't just blabber stuff just for the sake of doing it..
And as far as helping America to overthrow Saddam is concerned, that was a good decision as Saddam was a proven munafiq..but Khameini was wrong to back America in Afghanistan..but in either case they pulled out right after regime change..
nilo723 2 years ago
Tut, Tut, Tut, Nilo...
You're still singing the same tune and have not learnt a damn thing!
halaqah1 2 years ago
the day u come out clean and say that u believe Bin Laden was responsible for 9/11 and u back his stupid actions, i bet nobody is gonna watch ur Al-Qaeda sponsored videos..
even Sheikh Imran Hosein and Dr.Zakir Naik think that 9/11 was an inside job and still believe Osama's lie that he was not responsible, just like Mullah Omar fell for it..
nilo723 2 years ago
shaykh imran hossein is an ashari/sufi cleric who contradicts his own words by backing the shia wup after condemning shiaism (and nice tactic on your part to divert everything i spoke on with regards to Iran and the shia and change the the subject matter - its proof that your taqiyyah has failed). Dr. Naik never gave a definitive answer. he said it *might* have been an inside job, and he said if bin Laden is terrorizing America (the biggest terrorist) - than he is with him!!
Lone1Wolf9 2 years ago
Additionally, Dr. Naik maybe saying what he is saying out of personal security concerns (and in this situation - it is even permissible for sunnis to do taqiyyah). after all, if he came out in support of bin Laden...how long do u think it would take the rat-worshipers to put him in jail (just as the kuffar and apostate yemeni apostate government are hunting one of the greatest imams of our time - anwar al-awlaki)??
Lone1Wolf9 2 years ago
i don't know whether u and 'halaqah1' work together or not, but he had Sheikh Imran Hosein featuring in most of his videos..and my opinion is the same as of Dr.Zakir Naik and Sheikh Imran Hosein..
If 9/11 had been an inside job as the whole Muslim world thought when Bin Laden initially denied it, Bin Laden would have bin a great hero!
but now that we know he really planned all of it, he has become a criminal and liable for Sharia punishment..
/watch?v=kYNN2ezZKio
nilo723 2 years ago
Nilo. I'm really glad I banned u from commenting on my channel.
Best decision I ever made.
I come out clean. Democracy is rubbish! :)
halaqah1 2 years ago
Indeed democracy is rubbish..
We have our own divine system of governance called spiritual democracy by Allama Iqbal, ie the Caliphate!
nilo723 2 years ago
Nilo.
Why mix Kufr terms (democracy) with the Islamic Caliphate?
Islam does not NEED democrazy. Islam is perfect on its own. Even Shah Wali Ullah(rh) knew this.
L1W9 is right you cannot say shia are deviants then say that a shia is the best ruler in the world?!?!
What pills are you on?
halaqah1 2 years ago
'Spiritual Democracy' is a term given by Allama Iqbal, considered to be the mujaddid of the 20th century, just like Shah Waliullah is considered to be of the 18th century..
Shiasm is indeed a misguided sect, but still they remain Muslims according to the Ijma of the scholars of our times and our predecessors..
I never said any Shia could be the 'best ruler' ever..plz don't cook up lies..i just didn't say that..
nilo723 2 years ago
5 - here is what really happened to the sunni at the hands of Iran's meddling in Iraq (and it has nothing to do with Saddam)...
/watch?v=xagqIHtNDEo
here is the very *minimum* u need to consider regarding this satanic republic...
/watch?v=ti2vb70bmhA
and finally, clear show of support and unity (which no one will ever break insha'Allah) between al-Qaidah and the Taliban...
/watch?v=Hs9c0PBqNig
Lone1Wolf9 2 years ago
its foolish to show videos of Iranians discriminating against Sunnis when even Taliban made the same mistakes against Shias in their rule..
all i said that Ahmadinejad did not support US occupation on any instance..he is firm believer in ALLAH(swt) and his Messenger(pbuh), though i agree he belongs to a misguided sect..
/watch?v=PbWDUmlWOs8
nilo723 2 years ago
the truth is foolish? you are far and away from Islam, because u lie and practice taqiyyah to the point that u don't even know the difference between reality and the "matrix". the shias are NOT a legitimate part of this ummah, or a real sect, or a true madhab!? but your true colors are now showing (after u avoided answering my ? about your own faith)! shiaism was created by a jew from yemen and has been a constant fitnah within our ummah. their history is one of constatn back-stabbing.
Lone1Wolf9 2 years ago
Ah! so now u show ur true colors and declare me to be outside the fold of Islam..and now my blood is halal for u to shed rite?
Brother, this is the takfiri ideology of Osama Bin Laden that allows his conscience to slaughter Muslims and non-Muslims like animals..stay away from all this, or else u would lead urself to eternal doom!
nilo723 2 years ago
bin Laden is not a takfiri. but takfir was even practiced by the Prophet (saaws) for being a Muslim is not an open checkbook but rather, conditional...and the Quran has specific provisions as to what continues a Muslim, what contradicts the shahadah, and what nullifies Islam. learn just a little bit about aqeedah, fiqh/shariah before u jump into politics and start spreading the "lies" of others regarding fellow Muslims. this will also solve your lack of knowledge with regards to the shia cult.
Lone1Wolf9 2 years ago
Salam wa alkuim brother, its a very good video, but i dont really understand the point here?
WHO'S BEGINING TO BELIEVE`? TRUE OR FALSE?
AND WHO IS A PERSON IN THE END THE VIDEO, NOT SHEIKH IMRAN, BUT THE OTHER ONE THANKS.
bleehyyy 2 years ago
Ahmadinejad is a good Muslim..
nilo723 2 years ago
salam alikoum akhiGREENEHO1 I DONT UNDERSTAND? who is begining to belive answer me please.
dnazim 2 years ago
loooooooool
very true and powerful
haqseeker 2 years ago
lol ur funny bro
good job tho keep it up
abujara911 2 years ago 2