New Theory of Gravity

[philopolymath]

NOT NEW!

WALTER RUSSELL 1920's

THEORY OF EVERYTHING...simple sweet ACCURATE!

NOT ANOTHER SUPER GENIUS FROM THE WILD E. COYOTE SCHOOL OF PHYSICS

GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF EINSTEINS' ASS

NO BB NO BLACK HOLES NO DARK SHIT

[Fstoped]

Could dark matter be space itself? If space bends it has to have mass or energy. Though the particles of space defy our detection ability they must be there. They would be very small but there is a lot of space. I am not a physicist, just drawing conclusions based on what I am told about the nature of the universe by those that have the degrees.

[BER2ERKER]

It doesn't matter to it's existence if it is matter or an underdevelopment of our

field theories; it does exist wither way as we know it.

[BER2ERKER]

Dark matter is very clearly observed. Gravitational lensing is the best example of this observation. It's only called dark matter because we don't know what it is. It IS there, whatever it is. it is a non-smooth entity, unlike current gravity or dark energy; which, is why it was called dark matter. Dark energy, the name given to the cosmological constant (which by the way was predicted), is called energy because it is smooth and constant. These are questions of "what is it", not "does it exist"

[hrbear]

At 5:11 I like much this about negative time. It's like when you set the time on your digital clock. There are 2 buttons + and - .

[israelsocratus]

The formula of Gravity’s creation : h*f = kT logW 1 The formula E= h*f explained the energetic reason of Gravity 2 The formula E= kT logW explained the material reason of Gravity 3 This formula describes the possibility of realization of macro state from micro state. This formula explains the conditions of gravitation, the beginning conditions of star formation h*f = kT logW , h*f > kT logW , h*f < kT logW This local gravity area is Debye : Q(d) = h*f (max) / k

[nikolayzou]

Dark matter exists, it is really the aether.

[dejesusluisx]

@nikolayzou ""Dark matter exists, it is really the aether."" Wouldn't the aether be dark energy instead? just asking.

The current theory of gravity explains gravity as a "bend" in space time, the problem is a bend doesn't exists as an entity the same way a hole doesn't exists, so gravity might not be considered itself as a force. If it were, you could define the effects of it as either pulling or pushing. I haven't read this book, but any new definition of gravity must be able to explain this.

[jqs1943]

The two components of the gravitational force fields have a compression power factor of .0735 pounds per sq. in. per linear mile of excursion and incursion starting at the plane of the exosphere. Weight in matter is an illusion impose on it by gravity which coalesces and unifies matter, therefore; as matter ascends into the atmosphere, it loses weight at a rate of .005 lbs. of its mass.

[jqs1943]

Mr. Newton discovered gravty and i discovered the X-gravity field factor. A gravitational force field is inherent of the extreme heat within the planets. It consists of two subfields, one excursive which i've named the X-gravity factor that repels other worlds and establishes their orbital corridors; and gravity (incursive)that serves to unify matter towards a concentric point from whence it originates. Both fields accrue presure stating at the plane of the exosphere but in opposite directions.

[ChrisCasar]

It may be that Gravity is polarized like Magnetism but on such a large scale that we don't recognize it yet. A scale bigger than the local clusters of galaxies our Milky Way galaxy exists in. It would be massive chains of superclusters over billions of light years with galactic sized black holes as the engines and massive dynamos needed to create an energy force we know as gravity. It would explain the framework of the Universe hetter and it's structure and is far simpler than the big bang.

[mrbluesky323]

@ChrisCasar

". It would be massive chains of superclusters over billions of light years..."

But given the current expansion of the universe, and given that gravitational information can't travel faster than light, phenomena on that order will never reach us anyway.

[MilesB1975]

This guy must be a real hit at parties....

[yourcommentsuck]

@MilesB1975 ha ha...thats fukn hilarious.......I have read alot of the book though...its pretty cool......your comment doesnt suck!!

[rotagen5]

entropy? the meat puppets said it best,"little by little by little it all goes to hell"

[rotagen5]

This is gonna sound stupid and very "dr who" (and it probably is) but what if the "dark matter" is simply run of the mill matter simply existing in alternate universes moving over our time scale...another dimension if you will. Actually I agree, concepts such as dark matter, the big bang, and the idea that gravity moves at a finite speed are all based on flimsy evidence, evidence which can be explained in other fashions.

[Pat2599]

@rotagen5 to have it be from alternate dimension you the observer would have to be in that alternate dimension and if you were in that dimension... dimension (B) all off the mater in dimension (A) would be altered into whatever dimension (B) is composed of

[GateMessenger]

@rotagen5 Dark matter may not exist. Galaxies may form differently than do solar systems(Nebula theory?). Like trying to use the ingredients in a cake recipe to make beef stew. First determine how galaxies form differently, then one may see why the stars move so quickly furthest from the galaxy centers. It may have nothing to do with the mass/gravity ratio but on how the material collected to form the outer stars. It might also help to study up on pair production, energy converting to particles.

[ivanleo]

@GateMessenger It doesn't matter how the material from the outer stars was collected, without modifying gravity or dark matter, they should simply fly away as they move above the scape velocity of the galaxy (calculating this escape velocity based on Einstein's gravity and visible matter)

[GateMessenger]

@ivanleo Do you know what dark matter is? Dark matter is an observed phenomena taking place noticeably with the stars which makes up the outer arms of the Milky Way galaxy. It is an effect which was not predicted by current theories. What do you think is causing this effect? You are talking about escape velocity? Current theory of how galaxies form cannot explain why stars furthest from the core orbit faster than the stars nearest to the core. Insert gravity and it should be the opposite.

[ivanleo]

@GateMessenger Dark matter is not an observed phenomena, otherwise A) it wouldn't be dark and B) if it were observed, nobody would be looking for it any more. I mentioned escape velocity because that is the problem with stars on the outer rim of the galaxy, they move at a higher rate than the escape velocity of the galaxy if you base the escape velocity on the visible matter that forms the galaxy, therefore these stars should fly away from the galaxy rather than orbit it.

[MisterBouncyBounce]

@GateMessenger dark matter is not proved, it has not been observed. dark matter is a hypothesis. how i think your confused is this. a phenomena is what is being observed, someone postulates an explanation, that postulation is given a name, "dark matter".

it's nothing more than that. the phenomena is real but the explanation is suspect, it may very well be wrong, ie, dark matter may not even exist.

[GateMessenger]

@MisterBouncyBounce I agree, dark matter cannot be proven yet something is causing the effect. I believe it can be explained without dark matter(hidden extra gravity).

[nextthought]

Dark matter I doubt that this substance exist the way most theorist explain it. I do believe there is much we don't see, visual spectrum, radiation and probably in a few ways we have not thought of.

The big bang theory is silly and weak it makes foolish assumptions and built on a house of cards. Right now there is no way to confirm observation over great distance, what about distortion that act on our visual information. Math probability can be used to prove anything right or wrong.

[Yamahaphone]

@nextthought but where did all that excess radiation come from and and the other galaxies are red shift

[nextthought]

Well there are many places the radiation could come from other dimensions or maybe the mathematicians made a mistake when they first formed the premise.

Without testing and experimental data there is really is no way of knowing...and I value some of the value in theories but theories can stiffle imagination and the big bang theory is so simple it lacks the probable complexity it takes to form a universe!

[Yamahaphone]

@nextthought well i guess we need to fugure out gravity first!!!

[nextthought]

Yes your right...

[crowefloyd]

Do you know what the problem is in explaining all these theories!! "We are so small and the Universe so BIG" Floyd A Crowe

[marsCubed]

Roger Penrose suggests that in the super cold state arising out of heat death, when vacuum pressure has evaporated even black holes, dissipated matter may behave like a single particle. This is consistent with what we observer in super cooled matter such as helium for instance. In Penrose's theory, in the extreme cold, the universe 'forgets' about scale, this then becomes a new big bang. It occurs that such an event might be, at the moment of zero energy, intimately connected to infinity.

[marsCubed]

in such a scheme, the universe seems like a bubble which is both expanding and collapsing at the same time, where existence is riding the geometric property of scale, like a wave front perhaps. I am no theoretical physicist, however this explanation seems very elegant to me. Could this also correspond to your ideas in some way?

[aironeous]

There is no dark matter, it is Hydrinos in different resting states. Check out blacklight power.

[lion9213]

This makes sense.

[subtle0savage]

Thankyou for posting this. Would like to see more of Mr. Moffats ideas put up on youtube.