When they were back to just a few feet above the ground, couldn't they just have dropped the nose and maybe pulled back the right throttle and planted it back onto the runway?
the B2 bomber is a copy of Horton229 fighter and Horten Ho-18 bomber which was going to be built by the Nazi's to nuke Newyork and washington, it took the american pigs 50 years to copy the nazi plans
Everyone seems to think these old B-2 bombers & Stealth fighters & bombers are still the top of the line for the USA. I know these things were obsolete when they were revealed to the public. It's been damn near 25+ years since any new major announcements. I'm guessing they have something really, really advanced. Perhaps a new purpulsion system of some type. A Nuclear RAMJET? a pulse-detonation engine? What happened to the Aurora plane hint in the early X-Files? Still highly classified I bet.
@FalloutRadius Luckily, the maintenance crew were safe in this case, because the moisture issue was not addressed in their tech dat athe that time. Even though Guam was the only place the B-2 can actually land when traveling international and is surrounded by nothing but water , engineers still never thought about that procedure. Saved by the T.O.
Free inexhaustible energy is real!But the big oil corporations don't want that technology revealed,Find this technology at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Let the revolution begin!
@farshid1979enghdar kire ino ono havale nakon, ba hamin nimche dodoli ke dari kheili kara mitoni bekoni, mitoni bezari laye mamehaye maman jonet, shoombol tala
@NaturalGroundation due to the compltely unconventional flight systems needed to control a no tail design, the pilots inputs are processed by computers which decide how to move the control surfaces to achieve the desired effect. the computers take data from the faulted readings there is no 'just add power and level out' the pilots cant decide HOW to move the plane, they just tell it where. Those pilots r the most accomplished in the world. Your a u tube jockey who thinks he knows better?.
@slickstrings Its called manual override dipstick. Your damn right im pissed... these toys cost a fortune to just be wrecked because of stupidity on the part of safety checks.
Also your argument makes zero sense.. are you saying the throttle control is computer controlled also? Bull. They panicked and ejected end of story.
Instead of throttling up after realizing the controls were not responding correctly they said fkit we are out.
I also am not a youtube jocket I just call it as it is.
@NaturalGroundation manual overide doesnt exist. The aircraft doesnt have a tail, the pilot cannot make the decisions to alter the airflow using the complicated combination of control surfaces needed to have the correct outcome. new modern aircraft are designed with instability in mind. the EF typhoon is the same, as is the F117. The pilot CANNOT cantrol the aircraft manually. As a pilot, i can tell you, its not as it looks. They know better than you do. They are the cream of the US air force.
@NaturalGroundation...Ok first, their instruments told them they had already reached takeoff speed when actually they didn't......next, since the aircraft wasn't at the correct takeoff speed, this prevented the flight controls to provide sufficient response to inputs from the pilot (i.e. they were "mushy"). Third, the engines were probably maxed out for the takeoff roll.....that means there was little if any additional thrust available.
@gooooblaster1800 There were 21 made. One crashed, and twenty are still in active service.
None are being built now, but that doesn't mean there won't be anymore built in the future. If we get into a serious enough arms race with another country and if our economy can support the defense budget, there would be no reason more wouldn't be built.
The argument that no lives were lost in this accident doesn't hold water (no pun). If 1.4 billion dollars were invested in hospitals, many lives would have been saved. If that aircraft didn't get destroyed, but instead assisted in a future war, many American soldiers' lives could also have been saved.
@CNSZU So you're saying, if the aircraft hadn't been destroyed in this accident, you WOULD have had $1.4 billion to invest in hospitals? Tell us now, how exactly do you "invest" money that was already "spent" for the manufacture of said aircraft?
Answer: You can't, unless you cheat the Accounting and point to some other $1.4 billion in some other government ledger. In which case it's all moot and it's your argument that doesn't hold water.
@RingSight91 You're an idiot for criticizing CNSZU. Nowhere in his statement did he mention double-spending of money. He simply stated that if $1.4 billion had been spent on hospitals, lives would be saved. CNSZU's statement was one that indicated where he would have liked to have seen the money go. Of course, you would know that if you were a natural-born American and studied English as hard as that other two languages you claim to speak as per information from your profile.
@ichstudieredeutsch >"CNSZU's statement was one that indicated where he would have liked to have seen the money go."
Whine, whine, waah, waah, and turn all the swords into spades, all the pitchforks into ploughshares, right? You think I didn't recognize that kind of thinking in the beginning? It's called sarcasm, Herr Deutch.
And it's "Naturalized American". It's the opposite of "Natural-Born" American. Know the difference. Dank schön.
@RingSight91 I happen to know the difference between naturalized and natural-born. I happen to be natural-born...aka: born in the U.S.A. You, apparently, are naturalized because you don't seem to understand the subtleties of the English language. Pick up a high school English book before showing off your ignorance. Until then, du kannst mich mal am Arsch lecken.
@ichstudieredeutsch What's with this "apparently naturalized" half-arsed observation? What did I EXPLICITLY write on my profile which YOU MISREAD? And you want to talk about "subtleties" of the English language, LOL? I wrote in Plain English, and you screwed-up twice! How about YOU sit on that arsch of yours and do some more reading on your own language. Heaven knows I've met more native English-speakers who are WORSE in it than I. So don't claim proficiency as a birthright, Herr Douche.
@RingSight91 I misread nothing in your profile. Perhaps you need to take your "Plain English" book, sit down and reread what I wrote to you. While your at it, reread what CNSZU wrote. If you can't surmise what's being written to you, perhaps you should call it a day...(in plain English, that means give up.) Another bit of plain English for you: subtleties - (noun, plural[that means more than one]) the state or quality of being subtle...something apparently you lack. Read a book.
>"you would know that if you were a ***natural-born American***[emphasis mine]...as per information from your profile."
>"sit down and reread what I wrote to you."
Just did right there. Herr Deutsch - Englisch: Reading Fail lolz!
When you're done with your Remedial Reading 101, perhaps you might want to take-up Political Activism 301 to know the REAL reason CNSZU stated such rhetorical BS.
@RingSight91 If you wanted to bash someone for rhetorical bull, then why didn't you cambodian555's or Mr108454's messages from two months ago? Both were written since CNSZU's statement, and both were written before you decided to bash CNSZU for his imaginary "swords into spades and pitchforks into ploughshares[sic]" comment. Had you jumped on them, I wouldn't have said a word to you.
@ichstudieredeutsch >"Had you jumped on them, I wouldn't have said a word to you." So apart from a half-assed teaching hobby, you're also a part-time arbiter? I hope you're making good money trolling the boards and jumping on people whom you think are being unfair. 9_9
What do you care about a B2 crash anyway? Aren't the Youth of America supposed to be apathetic to these events? OTOH I actually know people from the 509th.
@ichstudieredeutsch >"Read a book." Have read plenty. How about you try. Tell me, where did usage of the phrase "as per" come to be considered as a perfectly acceptable substitute to mean "according to"? Let's stick to serious academic references now, not lazy linguistic conventions. Look long and hard, I can wait all day.
@RingSight91 English for Retards lesson 1: as per - (preposition phrase) according to...from the Merriam-Webster website... I don't suppose Merriam-Webster is academic enough for you. Hopefully, I didn't keep you waiting all day.
@ichstudieredeutsch >"I don't suppose Merriam-Webster is academic enough for you." No it's not. MW merely outlines and adapts to linguistic convention as they ARE USED not as they SHOULD BE used. I ask for a **textbook** reference and you quote a freaking **dictionary**? *sighs* Predictably lazy, some kids these days. Still FAIL.
@RingSight91 English for Retards lesson 2: "...natural-born American and studied...as per information from your profile." Notice the "and"? An elementary student knows that "and" changes to a new clause in the sentence. "Natural-born American" and "as per information in profile" are two different clauses. That is a subtlety in the English language that you didn't seem to catch.
@ichstudieredeutsch >"English for Retards lesson 2: "...natural-born American and studied...as per information from your profile." Notice the "and"?"
Oh I noticed the "and" alright. Try pushing "subtlety" all you want, first off I NEVER wrote "Natural-Born American" anywhere in my profile. Second **without** a comma before your "and" such distinctions between clauses as you assert cease to exist. Meaning YOU effed-up and twice at that. Your "clauses" became a single collective phrase. FAIL.
@RingSight91 Political Activism for Retards 1: If CNSZU wanted to be a political activist, he wouldn't post his message on an obscure video on YouTube. He said,"the argument that no lives were lost" is incorrect because the aircraft lost could've saved lives in future wars. There's zero political activism in his statement. If he said that this was [insert president or party name here], that would be a political statement.
@ichstudieredeutsch >"If he said that this was [insert president or party name here], that would be a political statement."
There's overt and active, and then there's subtle, cynicism-infused, means of practicing such activism. You'd know that if you had even single semesters of Political Science AND Sociology to your name. But if all you took was the one for Retards, then I'm sorry to hear of your affliction.
@RingSight91 Political Activism for Retards 2: You said,"turn all the swords into spades, all the pitchforks into ploughshares." This indicates that you read into CNSZU's and my statements that we are peace pushing hippies.
@ichstudieredeutsch >"This indicates that you read into CNSZU's and my statements"
CNSZU is more than welcome, and I hope capable, to speak for him or herself to clear-up any ambiguity in the matter. OTOH you had no [original] statements of your own. Why you'd bother coming to his or her defense is beyond me. You sorority sisters? Meanwhile I'll take CNSZU's continued silence on the matter as an affirmation that I did read correctly between his or her lines.
@RingSight91 Again, reread our statements. Really take in and try to understand what we're saying. Don't show your ignorance by commenting way off topic, putting words in CNSZU's mouth, or misquoting my statements to give it a different meaning.
If you can't understand English, go to your nearest elementary school and enroll in Kindergarten. Try again; maybe you'll get it right this time.
CNSZU had a statement. All you had was an interpretation thereof. As they say, lolz fail! How about coming-up with something yourself and quit butting-into other people's exchanges?
@RingSight91 Let's get you up to speed. They don't teach you to put commas in from of "and" anymore. It's an option if you're used to it but not a requirement. You'd know this if you'd paid any attention in your English classes. My "single collective phrase" contained one subject(understood you) and two verbs seperated by the conjective "and". Your analysis of English is what fails. No where in my statement did I ever say that you were a natural-born American. In fact, it was the opposite.
@ichstudieredeutsch >"They don't teach you to put commas in from of "and" anymore."
Of course they don't. They teach you to put a comma "in FRONT of" the "and". It's called Proper Grammatical Construction of a Sentence which uses Correlative Expressions. It's apparent your teachers were just as lazy in their instruction, hence your low International Academic Ranking. No wonder you need 12 grade levels to compete with us who succeed with 8.
@RingSight91 Rules for Writers Fifth Edition Diana Hacker ISBN: 0-312-40685-1 p.266 section 32a: Use a comma before a coordinating conjunction joining independent clauses.
In the sentence,"Of course, you would know that if you were a natural-born American and studied English as hard as that other two languages you claim to speak as per information from your profile," there is only one subject(understood you) which makes the second clause dependent on the first...no comma necessary.
@ichstudieredeutsch >"there is only one subject(understood you) which makes the second clause dependent on the first...no comma necessary"
No, because omitting the comma implies that you attributed both "qualities" upon me based on an apparent reading of my Profile, (a) the alleged "natural-born" and (b) "ability to speak two other languages", both of which I "claimed to be" in your eyes. Claim subtlety all you want, you're still a lousy writer.
@RingSight91 Schooled you, again. Come back anytime for free lessons. After all, it is my hobby. Did you like the academic research? I kept every book I ever had in college.
@ichstudieredeutsch >"and two verbs seperated [sic] by the conjective "and""
What "verbs"?! Since when did "being a natural-born American" or "being proficient in two or more languages" become a "verb"?
Perhaps that is your problem -- failure to distinguish between [rather long] Adjectives and Verbs. No wonder you care not for the comma. No wonder you public school kids have so much trouble learning another language, you have much difficulty mastering your own (lolz).
@RingSight91 Let's have another look at the statement,"you would know that if you were a natural-born American and studied English as hard as that other two languages you claim to speak as per information from your profile." "You" is the subject of the sentence. "Were" and "studied" are verbs. Both are separated by "and". Since there is no subject for the second clause, it is dependent on the first(requiring no comma before the "and"). Private school was a waste of your time.
LOL, no they're not. "To study" would have been one, "To be" is definitely not! "To be" or "being" a "natural-born" American is not a verb. It is not something you "do" it is something that is "conferred" to you by birth, either by your parents' citizenship of by the place of such in US Territory.
Public School was a waste of your time, but I guess you had no choice in the matter, lol.
@RingSight91 " 'To be'...is not a verb." WOW! Are you a moron or a troll? Any elementary school student knows "to be" is a verb. WTF did they teach you in private school?! You sound just as ignorant as a girl I knew who honestly believed dinosaurs did not exist because it goes against the bible. HOLY SHIT! You just stooped to a new level of stupid so low that I'm going to have to take some time away from the computer to comprehend how someone could have a negative IQ rating.
@ichstudieredeutsch >"Any elementary school student knows "to be" is a verb."
Fine, and a stupid definition of a verb it is. Still does not make for "being" a Natural-Born American an actual verb. Aside from being born, what did YOU do to get conferred that status?
(As opposed to being Naturalized which requires personal action to bring to fulfillment.)
@RingSight91 A dictionary is the most basic form of reference. There is no textbook out there that will cover all the uses for any given word because it already exists in the form of the dictionary. Merriam-Webster has been around since the 1800's. They are owned by the Encyclopedia Britainica. If you don't recognize that as an academic source, then you're even more retarded than I thought. Again, your ignorance astounds me.
@ichstudieredeutsch >"There is no textbook out there that will cover all the uses for any given word"
Spoken like a true child. Textbooks do not "cover" words are they "are used" they merely prescribe their usage as they "should be" used. How members of society (read: you) might murder the Queen's English in the most inventive of fashions is of course another matter.
Nerve of you to call me ignorant, you can't even spell "Encyclopaedia Britannica" correctly. Hah!
@RingSight91 ok, burn me on spelling, huh? What is a "ploughshare"? Did you mean plowshare? See: a plowshare is a component used for plowing a field; Ploughshare is a literary magazine. In your statement,"...turn all the swords into spades, all the pitchforks into ploughshares...," did you actually mean that we should turn our pitchforks into literary magazines?
@RingSight91 As for your political science and sociology fluff classes, why would you take such crap courses when you could've used that time to learn real skills? You obviously didn't take in what they were trying to teach you in those classes. Besides, who takes those classes anyways? Students who graduated by the skin of their teeth and GED recepients, yes. People who will contribute most to society, no.
@ichstudieredeutsch >"Students who graduated by the skin of their teeth and GED recepients, yes. People who will contribute most to society, no."
LOLZ, Fail again. You saying the United States **Air Force**, no, not Army, accepts GED Recipients now too? Because USAF is in my profile too you know, or did you miss that too?
So let's see...back-pedaling, re-writing rules of proper grammar, and resorting to crass insults when cornered. And you say your hobby is to "teach"? Brilliant!
@RingSight91 I misspelled two words in all of my writing...omg! I'm such a horrible person. At least I can figure out what someone is trying to communicate through writing and not read bull into it..i.e.: double spending of money...where did you come up with that? As far as the back-pedaling and rewriting rules, I've provided a valid counter-point to everything you've written. If USAF chooses to allow the retards of the world to serve in their ranks, then it's no wonder the B-2 crashed.
@ichstudieredeutsch >"i.e.: double spending of money...where did you come up with that?"
Because in the Real World, Federal money allocated to the DoD is less money to whomever this imaginary department is that should be building those hospitals. Not even the DHHS is tasked with that job.
You can't otherwise have your B2 and your hospitals at the same time, ergo you have to "spend twice". It's therefore all unwarranted Political Rhetoric to comment on such, on a loss of military aircraft.
@RingSight91 Again, all he said was that if the same value of money had spent on hospitals, it would've saved lives. If the aircraft hadn't crashed, the money spent on it would've saved lives in future conflicts. No where in his statement did he mention a political agenda. If you want to read something political into it, you could say that the hospital thing is on the left and the saved aircraft is on the right. They balance out.
Ah, so now an Accounting Lesson? Assets equals Liabilities? Ledgers and Balance Sheets? Well good thing I took that too.
The aircraft cannot be on the "left" (Asset) or can the hospitals be on the right (Liabilities) for your balance because, guess what, they're NOT ON THE SAME LEDGER.
Which government operates like that anyway? Having some sort of Wish Fund for every dollar spent on something else? "Oooh, we lost a bird, we shoulda used the money on something else." Waah!
@RingSight91 You should retake your accounting course because both, the aircraft and the hospital, are liabilities and assets. They're politically balanced because in CNSZU's statement COULD BE READ as a call to the left, hospitals, and a call to the right, military. He gave each equal weight in his statement. No where in his statement did he say,"we shoulda used the money on something else." Again, you fail to realize that his argument is: no lives were lost in this accident was not true.
@ichstudieredeutsch >"They're politically balanced because in CNSZU's statement COULD BE READ as...no lives were lost in this accident was not true."
Both your interpretations are speculative at best. Anyway my "lives lost/saved" statement was sarcasm directed at him. Why you'd care to infer other by other reasoning is beyond me.
>"the aircraft and the hospital, are liabilities and assets."
No, get this through your head: The US Government doesn't >generally< "own" hospitals, unlike these B2s!
@ichstudieredeutsch >"If the aircraft hadn't crashed, the money spent on it would've saved lives in future conflicts."
No, his statement clearly implied that, "The aircraft should NOT have been built in the first place because [insert hippie reason here], and should have been spent on hospitals/medical assets to begin with, thereby saving lives instead of being wasted in war."
Translated into any other language, his smart-alecky comment would've meant the same thing.
@ichstudieredeutsch >"retards of the world to serve in their ranks, then it's no wonder the B-2 crashed."
Ah, now your true motives transpire. Watching an AF crash video for the chance to trash talk the military. Lemme guess? Voted for Obama?
It's negligence you say?
Guess what, the procedures that "would have" prevented this mishap were **not outlined** in the Technical Orders, which are FOLLOWED TO THE LETTER might I add, pertaining to the maintenance operations of the B2.
@RingSight91 A little FYI for you: I happen to work and study side by side with the military. Ever heard of UTSI? It's located right next door to Arnold AFB. I have many, many friends who are serving in the Air Force. I have even thought about a military career.
"Lemme guess? Voted for Obama?" I could care less who is in office.
So lemme get this straight: the procedures in the TO that would have prevented this mishap were followed to the letter and this video is a hoax, right?
No, you didn't. Did you miss the double asterisks on NOT OUTLINED in my previous statement?
Read as: "A specific task which is not outlined in a procedures manual is obviously not going to be carried out by the people tasked to do the multitude of other tasks pertaining to a B2's preparation."
Attention to Detail: Something that is cultivated in the military, but apparently not in your UTSI.
'Thought about a military career", lol! Talk is Cheap, Herr Deutsch.
@RingSight91 Looks like Dr. Ryan doesn't like the taste of his own medicine. Don't like your words twisted around on you, try not to do the same to others. That is your whole problem.
You should also know that any new aircraft engine that is tested by the AF is brought through Arnold AFB with civilian help from UTSI. Your B-2 TOs were probably written by people I know.
Talk may be cheap, but it's there to reassure you that I'm no leftist hippie.
Hahah! Oh this is rich! So are you saying "your people" bloody "neglected" to add the part where the Crew Chiefs were advised to pre-warm and dry-out any condensation that might be on the Air Data sensors?
Not that it was an "engine" problem anyway, but you just had to go there, didn't you? *sigh* Still reaching, and failing.
@ichstudieredeutsch >"Don't like your words twisted around on you, try not to do the same to others."
Awww gee, and here I thought I would give you the benefit of the doubt and forgive any failure to read completely on your part; small text being in this page and all.
Your wit would've worked, if only it wasn't so obfuscated in its application. Fail.
@RingSight91 All this time, I thought I was talking to someone of intelligence. Then, I had an epiphany: you are an internet troll. Words like "lolz" and "fail" are classic definers of a troll. Plus, you continue an argument to try to get a rise from people. Nicely played, troll, but it's all over. I have a strict policy on not feeding trolls so have a nice life. I sure hope you aren't as stupid in real life as you make yourself out to be on the internet.
>"I have a strict policy on not feeding trolls so have a nice life."
This coming from the moron who thought he could interject on a simple exchange between two individuals in which he had no stake in their personal well-being. And after not getting the initial hints to butt-out, continued to respond using flawed arguments to continue his pointless discussion. After being called-out on his attempts at insult, now claims a belated epiphany, as if he wasn't the troll to begin with.
@RingSight91 As for CNSZU, he or she is probably laughing his or her ass off because of your retarded interpretation of his or her statement. Ambiguity? There is none. CNSZU gave a straight-forward opinion which you read too much into. As for my [original] statement, reread my first post. First post in summary(which still holds true): you're retarded and CNSZU said nothing of double-spending and only, simply, stated an opinion.
@RingSight91 Don't worry. We'll get you through this. I can't blame your teachers for not teaching you correctly; they probably weren't paid enough. I've got plenty of time and patience. I don't need to be paid because teaching the mentally handicapped is a hobby of mine. With time, we can take that helmet off your head and allow you to become a functioning member of society.
( allpositions ) SEE all the new celebrity sex tapes, free lifetime membership giveaway for next 24 hours at..... ..w w w . Starzuncovered. c o m............ ( exotic, And confirmation with a handshake allpositions )
B2 bomber is the best bomber so far, surpasses any other bomber in every way, but is has a reliability FAIL. A little moisture and gone... For such a technological marvel this is quite embarrassing.
Dont Believe the Hype... The B2 does not go in alone in to any warzone, it is escorted by Non stealth Fighter aircraft - there for its stealth isnt used!
you're right, 75,000 flight hours and 20 years of flight and 1 solitary crash has ruined the most advanced heavy bomber ever designed. Excellent point.
Think i heard of something similar happening to a Civilian air liner, Insects had built a nest in one of the sensors that told the planes computers about air speed etc. Once the pilots engaged Autopilot, the compute with false information stalled the aircraft resulting in its loss. The pilots could have taken back control I.e. turned the autopilot back off too recover the aircraft but for some reason didn't.
These things happen, luckily in the case of the B2 it didnt cost any lives just money
You do know this was a pre-military test, right? It cost a lot of money, but this plane had not been completed (addition of extra features, etc... After test), so it's cost was not much over 600 million.
As much as i love this bomber i still think it needs some work. But hey we pay for so much more look at NASA we launch a rocket 3x more than tis bomber it blows up so eather way we use a shit load of money
dude,as 25 years i work hard and i paid almost 350 dollars a month for a tax,its just got ruins with fuckin moisture....1.4 billion just got ruins......fuckin shitless......
AAAA. 302213Z OCT 2009 Sir I suggest that you read the Word of God the Holy Bible.....As I have read all your comments it reminds me what the Holy Bible tells me Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh....Read the good book young man....by now you will have my video.......AR.
Missouri REPRESENTIN'
GreenGersh 1 month ago
Who Would Have Thought a Small Amount of Liquid Would Ever Fall On Meeeeeeeeeeeeee?...
VoxVindicta 1 month ago 2
Hey everybody, let's put these guys in charge of our health care!
mf91007 1 month ago
Fuck USA go away USA
GeorgeWashington9x 2 months ago
0:28 left wing its designed to be a 1 winged aircraft
TheMRBLACKop12 2 months ago
woa
soildier2010 2 months ago
haha those thinks costs 2.000.000.000$ each
richard17393 3 months ago
When they were back to just a few feet above the ground, couldn't they just have dropped the nose and maybe pulled back the right throttle and planted it back onto the runway?
malamagr 3 months ago
so worked on this plane for years in area 51. only to blow up by a little bit of water
mattstorm360 6 months ago
@mattstorm360
the B2 bomber is a copy of Horton229 fighter and Horten Ho-18 bomber which was going to be built by the Nazi's to nuke Newyork and washington, it took the american pigs 50 years to copy the nazi plans
YUSKHAN 4 months ago
@YUSKHAN ok*rewrites comment* The nazis worked on this plane for years only to be coped by us to crash becuse of water.
mattstorm360 4 months ago
@YUSKHAN ''the B2 bomber is a copy of Horton229 fighter and Horten Ho-18 bombe''
The 229 and the Ho-18 had digital fly-by-wire and composite materials? Amazing. Could you provide a link please?
cayetanoluis 3 months ago
@cayetanoluis
You dumb fucken imperfect basted
YUSKHAN 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@YUSKHAN ''You dumb fucken imperfect basted''
That's not an argument.
Where's the link showing Nazi-developed digital fly-by-wire and composite materials?
cayetanoluis 3 months ago
That was weird why couldn't they fly
GLICHORAMA 7 months ago
Ha ha, they pilots were not informed of the problem, what were they busy drinking or something when they should have been talking to the ground crew.
OBAMASTINKSLIKEANAPE 7 months ago
@MRAPPORTGt5 Mine too :-)
alexRIDER11 7 months ago
Everyone seems to think these old B-2 bombers & Stealth fighters & bombers are still the top of the line for the USA. I know these things were obsolete when they were revealed to the public. It's been damn near 25+ years since any new major announcements. I'm guessing they have something really, really advanced. Perhaps a new purpulsion system of some type. A Nuclear RAMJET? a pulse-detonation engine? What happened to the Aurora plane hint in the early X-Files? Still highly classified I bet.
mrjustin5 7 months ago
bye bye one billion dollars.
oldSchooLson 10 months ago
@oldSchooLson That's bye bye 2.1 billion dollars!!!
worldchampion1986 8 months ago
OH! YOU THOUGHT YOU DIDN'T NEEDED A RUDDER!? EXACTLY! WHAT MADE YOU THINK YOU WERE BETTER THAN ALL THE OTHER AIRCRAFT! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Veraux 10 months ago 2
@Veraux lmao so true
marc15yo 10 months ago
@Veraux Flying wing, my ass.
oneone1onezero0 6 months ago
That was a really good reporting job. Not the usual "durrhhh the plane hit the ground" you'd find on network TV.
mikemurko 10 months ago
No veo la hora en que se hagan mierda los veinte que quedan...
Saludos... Gabriel...
apfaar 10 months ago
great a 1.8 billion dollor plane is dead yea thx pilots....o and thers now only 20 bombers now....
SniperBlitz2234 11 months ago
I wonder if this means I can shoot down a B-2 with a water gun?
dfletcherboyy12 1 year ago 36
@dfletcherboyy12 If that watergun is fired by a Blastoise then, yes.
RMabee88 1 month ago
so we only have 19 now?
nuggz503 1 year ago
@nuggz503 20. 21 were originally built and this is the only loss.
DGF2099 1 year ago
Man, I bet the maintenance crew for that B-2 had their hearts ripped out and fed to them by their superiors... nice [not] knowin' ya, guys...
FalloutRadius 1 year ago
@FalloutRadius Luckily, the maintenance crew were safe in this case, because the moisture issue was not addressed in their tech dat athe that time. Even though Guam was the only place the B-2 can actually land when traveling international and is surrounded by nothing but water , engineers still never thought about that procedure. Saved by the T.O.
mushmouth1981 11 months ago
hopefully this won't happen when it's carrying a nuclear payload
anontrance 1 year ago
@anontrance Actually, it has happened, just with other bombers instead of the B-2 such as the B-52... numerous times. :\
FalloutRadius 1 year ago
wdo you know what we could have used 1. whatever billions dollars for -.-
murk345 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free inexhaustible energy is real!But the big oil corporations don't want that technology revealed,Find this technology at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Let the revolution begin!
slipshodcoqbgg 1 year ago
i like b-2 spirits
kylelynch56 1 year ago
So this is how it looks like when 1.4 billion $ catches fire
SkyyCaptainn 1 year ago
US$1.4 billion in research and development couldn't account for water seepage.
I don't know of a more expensive oversight than this.
SoF333 1 year ago
2 bilhoes de dolares perdidos!
PhillipeReyes 1 year ago
Sad. Hopefully the pilots make a full recovery. As for the B-2, maybe recovering and fixing parts will make the new one cost less?
Morbuzka 1 year ago
@Morbuzka
good news,they are alive,but 2 billion dollar!,MY TAXES!!
RottSimba 1 year ago
@Mrsheytun ّ Fucking asshole. you mother fucker, peace coming after destroying of the Islamic Fascism.
farshid1979 1 year ago
@farshid1979 koon goshad to irani hasti ya amrikayi, kooni mooni
allexbratson 1 year ago
@allexbratson koooni madare jendate.
kiram dahane khahar madaret. koskeshe bi namoooos.
madar harjaeie koskesh
farshid1979 1 year ago
@farshid1979
Chera az koone in amrikayi ha mikhori enghadar, bia boro to kone man
allexbratson 1 year ago
@allexbratson kiram dahene madare jendat chi migi??
to ke konet inghad bi arzeshe, chera nemidi basijia botri noshabe bokonan toosh???
boro khahar madaretooo zire bashijia dar biar obnehee
farshid1979 1 year ago
@farshid1979 pedar sokhote, botri kardan to konet midoniya, kire khatibe namaz jome tehran, khatami, to halghet
allexbratson 1 year ago
@allexbratson kire manam to halghe khodetoo nanat.
Kire hazrate mohammad ba 12 emame dayos to kose khahart.
farshid1979 1 year ago
@farshid1979enghdar kire ino ono havale nakon, ba hamin nimche dodoli ke dari kheili kara mitoni bekoni, mitoni bezari laye mamehaye maman jonet, shoombol tala
allexbratson 1 year ago
Hmmmmmm....how about increase power and try to level out?
Pilots look like retards.
NaturalGroundation 1 year ago
@NaturalGroundation due to the compltely unconventional flight systems needed to control a no tail design, the pilots inputs are processed by computers which decide how to move the control surfaces to achieve the desired effect. the computers take data from the faulted readings there is no 'just add power and level out' the pilots cant decide HOW to move the plane, they just tell it where. Those pilots r the most accomplished in the world. Your a u tube jockey who thinks he knows better?.
slickstrings 1 year ago
@slickstrings Its called manual override dipstick. Your damn right im pissed... these toys cost a fortune to just be wrecked because of stupidity on the part of safety checks.
Also your argument makes zero sense.. are you saying the throttle control is computer controlled also? Bull. They panicked and ejected end of story.
Instead of throttling up after realizing the controls were not responding correctly they said fkit we are out.
I also am not a youtube jocket I just call it as it is.
NaturalGroundation 1 year ago
@NaturalGroundation manual overide doesnt exist. The aircraft doesnt have a tail, the pilot cannot make the decisions to alter the airflow using the complicated combination of control surfaces needed to have the correct outcome. new modern aircraft are designed with instability in mind. the EF typhoon is the same, as is the F117. The pilot CANNOT cantrol the aircraft manually. As a pilot, i can tell you, its not as it looks. They know better than you do. They are the cream of the US air force.
slickstrings 1 year ago
@NaturalGroundation in other words you call it as it is, from your uneducated perspective on the airframe.
cha0sx 8 months ago
@NaturalGroundation...Ok first, their instruments told them they had already reached takeoff speed when actually they didn't......next, since the aircraft wasn't at the correct takeoff speed, this prevented the flight controls to provide sufficient response to inputs from the pilot (i.e. they were "mushy"). Third, the engines were probably maxed out for the takeoff roll.....that means there was little if any additional thrust available.
phg0177 1 year ago
ouch that hurt my taxes
xXSuperSandvichXx 1 year ago 74
@xXSuperSandvichXx Yup....a billion here, a billion there, soon you're talking real money!
killingamps 1 year ago
@xXSuperSandvichXx Lmao
Dyangcheng 1 year ago
@RingSight91, @ichstudieredeutsch Please take your low life debate elswhere, no1 gives a fuck.
TheForgottenFridge 1 year ago
and that's how 4 bilion dolars fly away !
acvaticlifE 1 year ago
2 billion dollars, gone
pdelangel2 1 year ago
how do they take off?
IpodTouchpr0zX 1 year ago
I mite sound stupied but was this the only b-2 spirt made and will there ever be made more?
gooooblaster1800 1 year ago
@gooooblaster1800 There were 21 made. One crashed, and twenty are still in active service.
None are being built now, but that doesn't mean there won't be anymore built in the future. If we get into a serious enough arms race with another country and if our economy can support the defense budget, there would be no reason more wouldn't be built.
Hope this was helpful.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
2 billion dollars turning into dust XD
XunscopedX 1 year ago
sell the used parts on Craigslist?
hemet92544 1 year ago
1.4 i mean my bad and 14 b2's= 18.2
ArmyMenRTS5 1 year ago
my dad flys a b2 thank god it wasnt him we have 14 now we only have 13....
thats 1.2 billion $ down the drain 14 b2's is = 16.8 billion $
DID u know that.... a b2 cost over 2x its weight in GOLD yup 2x its weight in gold
ArmyMenRTS5 1 year ago
Next time you see a B2 taking off, throw a handful of water on the runway .. Lol
omarbadr36 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Russian PAK-FA 2nd Flight 4 minutes
watch?v=pCc3xhgPVZI
SAMTOMAS 1 year ago
Comment removed
ivanalihin 1 year ago
@ivanalihin no, they shot down an F-117.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
Something as simple as pitot heat destroys a B2
hunterhalo2 1 year ago
omg a ufo ahhhhhhh
MrBedlamMan 1 year ago
The argument that no lives were lost in this accident doesn't hold water (no pun). If 1.4 billion dollars were invested in hospitals, many lives would have been saved. If that aircraft didn't get destroyed, but instead assisted in a future war, many American soldiers' lives could also have been saved.
CNSZU 1 year ago
@CNSZU So you're saying, if the aircraft hadn't been destroyed in this accident, you WOULD have had $1.4 billion to invest in hospitals? Tell us now, how exactly do you "invest" money that was already "spent" for the manufacture of said aircraft?
Answer: You can't, unless you cheat the Accounting and point to some other $1.4 billion in some other government ledger. In which case it's all moot and it's your argument that doesn't hold water.
RingSight91 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RingSight91 Russian PAK-FA 2nd Flight 4 minutes
watch?v=pCc3xhgPVZI
SAMTOMAS 1 year ago
@RingSight91 You're an idiot for criticizing CNSZU. Nowhere in his statement did he mention double-spending of money. He simply stated that if $1.4 billion had been spent on hospitals, lives would be saved. CNSZU's statement was one that indicated where he would have liked to have seen the money go. Of course, you would know that if you were a natural-born American and studied English as hard as that other two languages you claim to speak as per information from your profile.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
@ichstudieredeutsch >"CNSZU's statement was one that indicated where he would have liked to have seen the money go."
Whine, whine, waah, waah, and turn all the swords into spades, all the pitchforks into ploughshares, right? You think I didn't recognize that kind of thinking in the beginning? It's called sarcasm, Herr Deutch.
And it's "Naturalized American". It's the opposite of "Natural-Born" American. Know the difference. Dank schön.
RingSight91 1 year ago
@RingSight91 I happen to know the difference between naturalized and natural-born. I happen to be natural-born...aka: born in the U.S.A. You, apparently, are naturalized because you don't seem to understand the subtleties of the English language. Pick up a high school English book before showing off your ignorance. Until then, du kannst mich mal am Arsch lecken.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
@ichstudieredeutsch What's with this "apparently naturalized" half-arsed observation? What did I EXPLICITLY write on my profile which YOU MISREAD? And you want to talk about "subtleties" of the English language, LOL? I wrote in Plain English, and you screwed-up twice! How about YOU sit on that arsch of yours and do some more reading on your own language. Heaven knows I've met more native English-speakers who are WORSE in it than I. So don't claim proficiency as a birthright, Herr Douche.
RingSight91 1 year ago
@RingSight91 I misread nothing in your profile. Perhaps you need to take your "Plain English" book, sit down and reread what I wrote to you. While your at it, reread what CNSZU wrote. If you can't surmise what's being written to you, perhaps you should call it a day...(in plain English, that means give up.) Another bit of plain English for you: subtleties - (noun, plural[that means more than one]) the state or quality of being subtle...something apparently you lack. Read a book.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago 2
@ichstudieredeutsch >"I misread nothing in your profile."
Oh really? Then where did this come from?
>"you would know that if you were a ***natural-born American***[emphasis mine]...as per information from your profile."
>"sit down and reread what I wrote to you."
Just did right there. Herr Deutsch - Englisch: Reading Fail lolz!
When you're done with your Remedial Reading 101, perhaps you might want to take-up Political Activism 301 to know the REAL reason CNSZU stated such rhetorical BS.
RingSight91 1 year ago
@RingSight91 If you wanted to bash someone for rhetorical bull, then why didn't you cambodian555's or Mr108454's messages from two months ago? Both were written since CNSZU's statement, and both were written before you decided to bash CNSZU for his imaginary "swords into spades and pitchforks into ploughshares[sic]" comment. Had you jumped on them, I wouldn't have said a word to you.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ichstudieredeutsch >"Had you jumped on them, I wouldn't have said a word to you." So apart from a half-assed teaching hobby, you're also a part-time arbiter? I hope you're making good money trolling the boards and jumping on people whom you think are being unfair. 9_9
What do you care about a B2 crash anyway? Aren't the Youth of America supposed to be apathetic to these events? OTOH I actually know people from the 509th.
RingSight91 1 year ago
@ichstudieredeutsch >"Read a book." Have read plenty. How about you try. Tell me, where did usage of the phrase "as per" come to be considered as a perfectly acceptable substitute to mean "according to"? Let's stick to serious academic references now, not lazy linguistic conventions. Look long and hard, I can wait all day.
RingSight91 1 year ago
Comment removed
ThermodynmcsRecknier 1 year ago
@RingSight91 English for Retards lesson 1: as per - (preposition phrase) according to...from the Merriam-Webster website... I don't suppose Merriam-Webster is academic enough for you. Hopefully, I didn't keep you waiting all day.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
@ichstudieredeutsch >"I don't suppose Merriam-Webster is academic enough for you." No it's not. MW merely outlines and adapts to linguistic convention as they ARE USED not as they SHOULD BE used. I ask for a **textbook** reference and you quote a freaking **dictionary**? *sighs* Predictably lazy, some kids these days. Still FAIL.
RingSight91 1 year ago
@RingSight91 English for Retards lesson 2: "...natural-born American and studied...as per information from your profile." Notice the "and"? An elementary student knows that "and" changes to a new clause in the sentence. "Natural-born American" and "as per information in profile" are two different clauses. That is a subtlety in the English language that you didn't seem to catch.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
@ichstudieredeutsch >"English for Retards lesson 2: "...natural-born American and studied...as per information from your profile." Notice the "and"?"
Oh I noticed the "and" alright. Try pushing "subtlety" all you want, first off I NEVER wrote "Natural-Born American" anywhere in my profile. Second **without** a comma before your "and" such distinctions between clauses as you assert cease to exist. Meaning YOU effed-up and twice at that. Your "clauses" became a single collective phrase. FAIL.
RingSight91 1 year ago
@RingSight91 Political Activism for Retards 1: If CNSZU wanted to be a political activist, he wouldn't post his message on an obscure video on YouTube. He said,"the argument that no lives were lost" is incorrect because the aircraft lost could've saved lives in future wars. There's zero political activism in his statement. If he said that this was [insert president or party name here], that would be a political statement.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
@ichstudieredeutsch >"If he said that this was [insert president or party name here], that would be a political statement."
There's overt and active, and then there's subtle, cynicism-infused, means of practicing such activism. You'd know that if you had even single semesters of Political Science AND Sociology to your name. But if all you took was the one for Retards, then I'm sorry to hear of your affliction.
RingSight91 1 year ago
@RingSight91 Political Activism for Retards 2: You said,"turn all the swords into spades, all the pitchforks into ploughshares." This indicates that you read into CNSZU's and my statements that we are peace pushing hippies.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
@ichstudieredeutsch >"This indicates that you read into CNSZU's and my statements"
CNSZU is more than welcome, and I hope capable, to speak for him or herself to clear-up any ambiguity in the matter. OTOH you had no [original] statements of your own. Why you'd bother coming to his or her defense is beyond me. You sorority sisters? Meanwhile I'll take CNSZU's continued silence on the matter as an affirmation that I did read correctly between his or her lines.
RingSight91 1 year ago
@RingSight91 Again, reread our statements. Really take in and try to understand what we're saying. Don't show your ignorance by commenting way off topic, putting words in CNSZU's mouth, or misquoting my statements to give it a different meaning.
If you can't understand English, go to your nearest elementary school and enroll in Kindergarten. Try again; maybe you'll get it right this time.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
@ichstudieredeutsch >"Again, reread our statements."
CNSZU had a statement. All you had was an interpretation thereof. As they say, lolz fail! How about coming-up with something yourself and quit butting-into other people's exchanges?
RingSight91 1 year ago
@RingSight91 Let's get you up to speed. They don't teach you to put commas in from of "and" anymore. It's an option if you're used to it but not a requirement. You'd know this if you'd paid any attention in your English classes. My "single collective phrase" contained one subject(understood you) and two verbs seperated by the conjective "and". Your analysis of English is what fails. No where in my statement did I ever say that you were a natural-born American. In fact, it was the opposite.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
@ichstudieredeutsch >"They don't teach you to put commas in from of "and" anymore."
Of course they don't. They teach you to put a comma "in FRONT of" the "and". It's called Proper Grammatical Construction of a Sentence which uses Correlative Expressions. It's apparent your teachers were just as lazy in their instruction, hence your low International Academic Ranking. No wonder you need 12 grade levels to compete with us who succeed with 8.
RingSight91 1 year ago
@RingSight91 Rules for Writers Fifth Edition Diana Hacker ISBN: 0-312-40685-1 p.266 section 32a: Use a comma before a coordinating conjunction joining independent clauses.
In the sentence,"Of course, you would know that if you were a natural-born American and studied English as hard as that other two languages you claim to speak as per information from your profile," there is only one subject(understood you) which makes the second clause dependent on the first...no comma necessary.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
@ichstudieredeutsch >"there is only one subject(understood you) which makes the second clause dependent on the first...no comma necessary"
No, because omitting the comma implies that you attributed both "qualities" upon me based on an apparent reading of my Profile, (a) the alleged "natural-born" and (b) "ability to speak two other languages", both of which I "claimed to be" in your eyes. Claim subtlety all you want, you're still a lousy writer.
RingSight91 1 year ago
@RingSight91 I have cited my sources. You have failed to cite yours. Until you do, your argument is void.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
@RingSight91 Schooled you, again. Come back anytime for free lessons. After all, it is my hobby. Did you like the academic research? I kept every book I ever had in college.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
@ichstudieredeutsch >"and two verbs seperated [sic] by the conjective "and""
What "verbs"?! Since when did "being a natural-born American" or "being proficient in two or more languages" become a "verb"?
Perhaps that is your problem -- failure to distinguish between [rather long] Adjectives and Verbs. No wonder you care not for the comma. No wonder you public school kids have so much trouble learning another language, you have much difficulty mastering your own (lolz).
RingSight91 1 year ago
@RingSight91 Let's have another look at the statement,"you would know that if you were a natural-born American and studied English as hard as that other two languages you claim to speak as per information from your profile." "You" is the subject of the sentence. "Were" and "studied" are verbs. Both are separated by "and". Since there is no subject for the second clause, it is dependent on the first(requiring no comma before the "and"). Private school was a waste of your time.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
@ichstudieredeutsch >""Were" and "studied" are verbs."
LOL, no they're not. "To study" would have been one, "To be" is definitely not! "To be" or "being" a "natural-born" American is not a verb. It is not something you "do" it is something that is "conferred" to you by birth, either by your parents' citizenship of by the place of such in US Territory.
Public School was a waste of your time, but I guess you had no choice in the matter, lol.
RingSight91 1 year ago
@RingSight91 " 'To be'...is not a verb." WOW! Are you a moron or a troll? Any elementary school student knows "to be" is a verb. WTF did they teach you in private school?! You sound just as ignorant as a girl I knew who honestly believed dinosaurs did not exist because it goes against the bible. HOLY SHIT! You just stooped to a new level of stupid so low that I'm going to have to take some time away from the computer to comprehend how someone could have a negative IQ rating.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
@ichstudieredeutsch >"Any elementary school student knows "to be" is a verb."
Fine, and a stupid definition of a verb it is. Still does not make for "being" a Natural-Born American an actual verb. Aside from being born, what did YOU do to get conferred that status?
(As opposed to being Naturalized which requires personal action to bring to fulfillment.)
RingSight91 1 year ago
@RingSight91 A dictionary is the most basic form of reference. There is no textbook out there that will cover all the uses for any given word because it already exists in the form of the dictionary. Merriam-Webster has been around since the 1800's. They are owned by the Encyclopedia Britainica. If you don't recognize that as an academic source, then you're even more retarded than I thought. Again, your ignorance astounds me.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
@ichstudieredeutsch >"There is no textbook out there that will cover all the uses for any given word"
Spoken like a true child. Textbooks do not "cover" words are they "are used" they merely prescribe their usage as they "should be" used. How members of society (read: you) might murder the Queen's English in the most inventive of fashions is of course another matter.
Nerve of you to call me ignorant, you can't even spell "Encyclopaedia Britannica" correctly. Hah!
RingSight91 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RingSight91 ok, burn me on spelling, huh? What is a "ploughshare"? Did you mean plowshare? See: a plowshare is a component used for plowing a field; Ploughshare is a literary magazine. In your statement,"...turn all the swords into spades, all the pitchforks into ploughshares...," did you actually mean that we should turn our pitchforks into literary magazines?
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
@RingSight91 As for your political science and sociology fluff classes, why would you take such crap courses when you could've used that time to learn real skills? You obviously didn't take in what they were trying to teach you in those classes. Besides, who takes those classes anyways? Students who graduated by the skin of their teeth and GED recepients, yes. People who will contribute most to society, no.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
@ichstudieredeutsch >"Students who graduated by the skin of their teeth and GED recepients, yes. People who will contribute most to society, no."
LOLZ, Fail again. You saying the United States **Air Force**, no, not Army, accepts GED Recipients now too? Because USAF is in my profile too you know, or did you miss that too?
So let's see...back-pedaling, re-writing rules of proper grammar, and resorting to crass insults when cornered. And you say your hobby is to "teach"? Brilliant!
RingSight91 1 year ago
@RingSight91 I misspelled two words in all of my writing...omg! I'm such a horrible person. At least I can figure out what someone is trying to communicate through writing and not read bull into it..i.e.: double spending of money...where did you come up with that? As far as the back-pedaling and rewriting rules, I've provided a valid counter-point to everything you've written. If USAF chooses to allow the retards of the world to serve in their ranks, then it's no wonder the B-2 crashed.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
@ichstudieredeutsch >"i.e.: double spending of money...where did you come up with that?"
Because in the Real World, Federal money allocated to the DoD is less money to whomever this imaginary department is that should be building those hospitals. Not even the DHHS is tasked with that job.
You can't otherwise have your B2 and your hospitals at the same time, ergo you have to "spend twice". It's therefore all unwarranted Political Rhetoric to comment on such, on a loss of military aircraft.
RingSight91 1 year ago
@RingSight91 Again, all he said was that if the same value of money had spent on hospitals, it would've saved lives. If the aircraft hadn't crashed, the money spent on it would've saved lives in future conflicts. No where in his statement did he mention a political agenda. If you want to read something political into it, you could say that the hospital thing is on the left and the saved aircraft is on the right. They balance out.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
>"They balance out."
Ah, so now an Accounting Lesson? Assets equals Liabilities? Ledgers and Balance Sheets? Well good thing I took that too.
The aircraft cannot be on the "left" (Asset) or can the hospitals be on the right (Liabilities) for your balance because, guess what, they're NOT ON THE SAME LEDGER.
Which government operates like that anyway? Having some sort of Wish Fund for every dollar spent on something else? "Oooh, we lost a bird, we shoulda used the money on something else." Waah!
RingSight91 1 year ago
@RingSight91 You should retake your accounting course because both, the aircraft and the hospital, are liabilities and assets. They're politically balanced because in CNSZU's statement COULD BE READ as a call to the left, hospitals, and a call to the right, military. He gave each equal weight in his statement. No where in his statement did he say,"we shoulda used the money on something else." Again, you fail to realize that his argument is: no lives were lost in this accident was not true.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
@ichstudieredeutsch >"They're politically balanced because in CNSZU's statement COULD BE READ as...no lives were lost in this accident was not true."
Both your interpretations are speculative at best. Anyway my "lives lost/saved" statement was sarcasm directed at him. Why you'd care to infer other by other reasoning is beyond me.
>"the aircraft and the hospital, are liabilities and assets."
No, get this through your head: The US Government doesn't >generally< "own" hospitals, unlike these B2s!
RingSight91 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ichstudieredeutsch >"If the aircraft hadn't crashed, the money spent on it would've saved lives in future conflicts."
No, his statement clearly implied that, "The aircraft should NOT have been built in the first place because [insert hippie reason here], and should have been spent on hospitals/medical assets to begin with, thereby saving lives instead of being wasted in war."
Translated into any other language, his smart-alecky comment would've meant the same thing.
RingSight91 1 year ago
@ichstudieredeutsch >"retards of the world to serve in their ranks, then it's no wonder the B-2 crashed."
Ah, now your true motives transpire. Watching an AF crash video for the chance to trash talk the military. Lemme guess? Voted for Obama?
It's negligence you say?
Guess what, the procedures that "would have" prevented this mishap were **not outlined** in the Technical Orders, which are FOLLOWED TO THE LETTER might I add, pertaining to the maintenance operations of the B2.
RingSight91 1 year ago
@RingSight91 A little FYI for you: I happen to work and study side by side with the military. Ever heard of UTSI? It's located right next door to Arnold AFB. I have many, many friends who are serving in the Air Force. I have even thought about a military career.
"Lemme guess? Voted for Obama?" I could care less who is in office.
So lemme get this straight: the procedures in the TO that would have prevented this mishap were followed to the letter and this video is a hoax, right?
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
>"So lemme get this straight:"
No, you didn't. Did you miss the double asterisks on NOT OUTLINED in my previous statement?
Read as: "A specific task which is not outlined in a procedures manual is obviously not going to be carried out by the people tasked to do the multitude of other tasks pertaining to a B2's preparation."
Attention to Detail: Something that is cultivated in the military, but apparently not in your UTSI.
'Thought about a military career", lol! Talk is Cheap, Herr Deutsch.
RingSight91 1 year ago
@RingSight91 Looks like Dr. Ryan doesn't like the taste of his own medicine. Don't like your words twisted around on you, try not to do the same to others. That is your whole problem.
You should also know that any new aircraft engine that is tested by the AF is brought through Arnold AFB with civilian help from UTSI. Your B-2 TOs were probably written by people I know.
Talk may be cheap, but it's there to reassure you that I'm no leftist hippie.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
@ichstudieredeutsch >"Your B-2 TOs were probably written by people I know."
Hahah! Oh this is rich! So are you saying "your people" bloody "neglected" to add the part where the Crew Chiefs were advised to pre-warm and dry-out any condensation that might be on the Air Data sensors?
Not that it was an "engine" problem anyway, but you just had to go there, didn't you? *sigh* Still reaching, and failing.
RingSight91 1 year ago
@ichstudieredeutsch >"Don't like your words twisted around on you, try not to do the same to others."
Awww gee, and here I thought I would give you the benefit of the doubt and forgive any failure to read completely on your part; small text being in this page and all.
Your wit would've worked, if only it wasn't so obfuscated in its application. Fail.
RingSight91 1 year ago
@RingSight91 All this time, I thought I was talking to someone of intelligence. Then, I had an epiphany: you are an internet troll. Words like "lolz" and "fail" are classic definers of a troll. Plus, you continue an argument to try to get a rise from people. Nicely played, troll, but it's all over. I have a strict policy on not feeding trolls so have a nice life. I sure hope you aren't as stupid in real life as you make yourself out to be on the internet.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
>"I have a strict policy on not feeding trolls so have a nice life."
This coming from the moron who thought he could interject on a simple exchange between two individuals in which he had no stake in their personal well-being. And after not getting the initial hints to butt-out, continued to respond using flawed arguments to continue his pointless discussion. After being called-out on his attempts at insult, now claims a belated epiphany, as if he wasn't the troll to begin with.
FAIL.
RingSight91 1 year ago
@RingSight91 As for CNSZU, he or she is probably laughing his or her ass off because of your retarded interpretation of his or her statement. Ambiguity? There is none. CNSZU gave a straight-forward opinion which you read too much into. As for my [original] statement, reread my first post. First post in summary(which still holds true): you're retarded and CNSZU said nothing of double-spending and only, simply, stated an opinion.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
@RingSight91 Don't worry. We'll get you through this. I can't blame your teachers for not teaching you correctly; they probably weren't paid enough. I've got plenty of time and patience. I don't need to be paid because teaching the mentally handicapped is a hobby of mine. With time, we can take that helmet off your head and allow you to become a functioning member of society.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago 8
@ichstudieredeutsch god damn mega owned that hoe
darthofevil23 1 year ago
@RingSight91 Proficiency was earned through learning and practice. Perhaps, you should do the same, Dr. Ryan.
ichstudieredeutsch 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
( allpositions ) SEE all the new celebrity sex tapes, free lifetime membership giveaway for next 24 hours at..... ..w w w . Starzuncovered. c o m............ ( exotic, And confirmation with a handshake allpositions )
Alaznexh 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free lifetime membershhip giveaway for the next 24 hours only! See all the latest celebrity sex tapes! Go here: Starzuncovered...dot...com...
steamier, nookie, kinky-ride
Abhinathaw 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
pathetic american shit..
1945Luftwaffe 1 year ago
@1945Luftwaffe pathetic german shit. oh wait, they have no shit :/ nvm
twitcheeee 1 year ago
B2 bomber is the best bomber so far, surpasses any other bomber in every way, but is has a reliability FAIL. A little moisture and gone... For such a technological marvel this is quite embarrassing.
Desolator1 1 year ago
Dont Believe the Hype... The B2 does not go in alone in to any warzone, it is escorted by Non stealth Fighter aircraft - there for its stealth isnt used!
blackArt2000 1 year ago
@blackArt2000 into conventional battle fields yes, but they g\have flown MANY stealth missions.
roberto376 1 year ago
you're right, 75,000 flight hours and 20 years of flight and 1 solitary crash has ruined the most advanced heavy bomber ever designed. Excellent point.
cjshull 1 year ago
Waste of a killstreak reward man
TheDM75 1 year ago
loled
ThaiL6 1 year ago
there it goes around 2.0 billion dollars
1658487 2 years ago
@1658487 2.2 :/
roberto376 1 year ago
it would suck to be the dude that owed the air force over a billion dollars.
Ho0lihan 2 years ago
virus in computer haha- pilots are ok thats good, fuck stealth
tetejac57 2 years ago
Think i heard of something similar happening to a Civilian air liner, Insects had built a nest in one of the sensors that told the planes computers about air speed etc. Once the pilots engaged Autopilot, the compute with false information stalled the aircraft resulting in its loss. The pilots could have taken back control I.e. turned the autopilot back off too recover the aircraft but for some reason didn't.
These things happen, luckily in the case of the B2 it didnt cost any lives just money
Satyr910 2 years ago
You do know this was a pre-military test, right? It cost a lot of money, but this plane had not been completed (addition of extra features, etc... After test), so it's cost was not much over 600 million.
scottycatman 2 years ago
@scottycatman im sorry but you havent noticed 600 MILLION is alot of cash.
bigbig741 2 years ago
There's been worse...
scottycatman 2 years ago
As much as i love this bomber i still think it needs some work. But hey we pay for so much more look at NASA we launch a rocket 3x more than tis bomber it blows up so eather way we use a shit load of money
AirSn1per 2 years ago
that cost more tax money than you and everyone you ever meet will pay in a lifetime. Just some moisture, but that's ok.
racevws 2 years ago
dude,as 25 years i work hard and i paid almost 350 dollars a month for a tax,its just got ruins with fuckin moisture....1.4 billion just got ruins......fuckin shitless......
lagendarock92 2 years ago
nice...a little bit of water cost 1.4 billion dollars.... :(
mkz4321 2 years ago
Well I will make sure to perform an air data calibration the next time i take my B2 Stealth bomber out for a spin
poontangification 2 years ago 11
Don't forget to rotate the tires too!
Rotate!
OlderG0ds 2 years ago
Worst camera man i have ever seen..
Caveman3222 2 years ago
wow
disembowmentrules 2 years ago
AAAA. 302213Z OCT 2009 Sir I suggest that you read the Word of God the Holy Bible.....As I have read all your comments it reminds me what the Holy Bible tells me Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh....Read the good book young man....by now you will have my video.......AR.
fourwayscottage 2 years ago
Comment removed
fourwayscottage 2 years ago
You know those guys got fired.
:)
Where do they get insurance to cover a billion dollar aircraft? Lol
badolzon 2 years ago
well at least this crash saved future B-2 Bombers from the same maintenance error
Suryavideo 2 years ago
well thats a 1 billion dollar mistake
cambodian555 2 years ago 15
Epic fail lol
feedthefire 2 years ago
@cambodian555 2.1 billion
bishshred 1 year ago
@cambodian555
if they didn't build five of these and gave 5 billion to help people in a current warzone America would be a lot more populair in the world^^
Mr108454 1 year ago
@Mr108454 actually we have 22 of them 1 cost 2.4 billion now its what we get right none for our inner citys and more for bombs
cambodian555 1 year ago
@cambodian555
no its 2 billion
usmceflips 1 year ago
@usmceflips no its 1.2 billion XD
samboguitarist 1 year ago
Very bad pilot error, shame.
morg3k 2 years ago
AAAA. 112446Z SEPT 2009 I do pray that it is not raining anywhere....when it in use !!!.......AR.
fourwayscottage 2 years ago