@blackOPSbeasty115 well,we humans just give phenomens a certain name to describe it better. it doesnt really matter if you say everything in our universe is made out of matter or antimatter,but we have to be made out of the same stuff like everything around us,because otherwise, there would be a painful reaction. haha
I just never get why scientists have to do this. I mean, can they stop people from getting sick, or starving? That Matters. Million$ for their fun projects. There's anti-Matter.
@sue200012 Scientists research this subject and many others because they want to know how the universe works. They constantly search for new discoveries, which brings new knowledge to our species. These "fun" projects that people are spending millions of dollars on will provide a greater knowledge of the universe that we call home. We know tons of stuff about the Earth and our Solar System, now it is time to expand into abyss even farther. Like the saying goes, "knowledge is power"!
@sue200012 The problem is not with science: it's political. There is no food shortage. As for illness, are you not aware of all the great accomplishments science has made in the field of medicine?
@quidproquo2004 Yes, accomplishments, but U.S. chock full of scientists yet 37th in world health accd to WHO, and never a cancer cure. Hope finding the amazing purple people particle will be more fruitful. Thanks.
@sue200012 "amazing purple people particle will be more fruitful". You clearly don't understand the point of science nor do you understand what it is. Science is the systematic pursuit of truth, employing reason, skepticism, falsifiability. Just because some dedicate their lives to understanding some aspects of nature without immediate gain, doesn't make it worthless. Some of the most important advancements were made by accident. No offense, but you need to go to the library
@quidproquo2004 Tell him or her to turn off their computer since the technology was partly developed based on principles derived from quantum mechanics.
@quidproquo2004 No offense, but I'll never worship science or scientists. I'm thinkin about scientists who thought Lister was goofy for washing his hands before surgery (arrogant). That important advancements were made "by accident" tells me something too. Thanks.
@sue200012 Your ignorance is offensive, though I don't blame you. You have no idea what science is: it has absolutely nothing to do with worship. Science is the systematic analysis of nature. Worship is letting someone else do your thinking for you.
"I'm thinkin about scientists who thought Lister was goofy for washing his hands before surgery (arrogant)."
Wrong again. In case you didn't realize this, it took time for the germ theory to be accepted. It's not an issue of arrogance.
@sue200012 thats because the US scientists for the large part are part of the US war based economy, and that is why the USA is uncontested #1 best military in the world, if all those scientists would stop designing f22s and nuclear submarines and satellites im sure their collective intelligence would be more then enough to solve world hunger, the energy crisis or even cure cancer... its just what they are told to do, USA uses its intelligence to build war machines and leads by force
@sue200012 well. you might be right with the point that we should try to stop these issues on earth. BUT its the majority of the people who are ignorant and selfish,so that this unfortunately does not work out... some people try.but not enough. anyways, its not the mistake of science. science is beauteful and amazing. im already said about the fact that i probably wont get to know all the truths about our existence etc. until i finally have to join the dead. :) but im fine with that
At 1:30 You say "WE THINK." But you should say, "WE HOPE." To lend purpose to your research. Why do you believe the CP VIOLATION is a near 50/50 split!? Where do you find substance to this claim? Would you agree or disagree that "Q" or charge has more to do with spin at the quantum scale? Therefore, spin (direction) depends on how you view it. The "question" that should be posed is: How do 'Matter Particles' acquire & preserve their spin, whilst operating effectively, in a quantum vacuum?
On topic, are positrons (or any form of antimatter) being "made" or expelled above thunderclouds at the moment of a lightning strike? If so, are there any known projects that aim to try to harness and collect them? Do a Wikipedia search for 'lightning sprites'.
There is no antimatter in the universe, after the big bang, all the matter anhialated the anti matter. So technically, in our universe, there is no antimatter. If string theorems are right, there might be other universes where antimatter won the war against matter moments after the big bang. Don't forget, there are 9 universes.
@NerfFrostMages this is just one theory! I mean, we were even able to produce antimatter in the LHC just next to me x) and they were even able to hold it for a pretty long time (i think milliseconds). So how can you say that there is no antimatter in the universe, which is billion times bigger than everything you can imagine, and where are billion times more energetic events which could produce lots of antimatter .
it has to be inbalanced in order for it (the universe)to exist, or maybe the anti matter is still out there in cysts waiting for certain conditions to occur so that it can be released and cancel everything out again, either way we are all part of the whole, you dont need to go to space to figure out existence, look within and save some rocket fuel
by breaking the law of physics; the law of conservation of matter. if matter was created without any sacrifice of the given limit of matter, then world or universe will explode in that magnitude.
Recommended reading if your into this is Antimatter by Frank Close.
Until we find a natural source of antimatter left in the universe, it wont be used to fuel spaceships or create bombs of any kind. It takes far more energy to create (and store!) antimatter then the energy from its annihilation is worth. At our current rate of production, filling a toy balloon with antihydrogen would take longer than the universe has existed!
Rather than saying that "matter" is made up of particles, why not simply say that all particles are made of "matter" as though matter inferred a single fundamental entity that manifests physical reality? That would infer matter and anti-matter are actually made of the same entity since they both simply convert each other into what we call energy; that would make energy the same stuff as matter! Why make things so complex?
you should ask the scientist at CERN. probably you could buy it if you paid 20billion dollars and wait a while. just tell me when you buy it so i know to move my ass to the other side of earth.
@TheNiggerXavi Impossible, since we already gave one set of substance the name of matter and the other anti-matter. Our definitions reflect things, not the other way around.
if there is an infinite number of parallel universe, is it safely assume that one of the parallel universe is filled with anti matter? if so, there is an another me in that universe that is composed of anti matter. WE CAN ANNIHILATE EACH OTHER!!!
So... how about instead of wasting all this money in this Antimatter stuff to spend it in the "Aetheric" technology that Tesla developed and succeeded? Oh wait! Unlimited free energy from anywhere in the Universe? Anti-gravity? Super luminal speeds? The Aether is ancient and forever new. One day!
A classless,moneyless,stateless communities of humanity in cooperation to take care of our needs and well being , expressing our creative energies in freedom of being. Capitalism is the manipulation of resources and technology for the private gain of a few in a monetary system that enslaves immense humanity in wage slavery of useless employment system that dehumanises and denies our human creative potential for a world of harmony within and without.
From Wkipedia's article on antimatter: "CERN can make 10^7 anti-protons per minute. Assuming an 100% conversion of antiprotons to antihydrogen, it would take 100 billion years to produce 1 gram or 1 mole of antihydrogen (approximately 6.02×10^23 atoms of antihydrogen)."
Space Shuttle Endeavour launches on its final mission, delivering the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer for installation on the International Space Station.
Its experiments will help researchers study the formation of the Universe and search for evidence of dark matter as well as investigate ANTIMATTER!
@HypercowXYZ coming from that 'username' I take it as a compliment. I am in biofuel research....you are probly an unemployed bum...now fuck off tramp lol
Matter and Antimatter are still in equal balance. Just because we can see Matter and can't see the Antimatter doesn't mean it's not any less. If so, Newton's 3rd law has been proven wrong. Theres always a balance of things. Antimatter has probably taken form as the Black Holes. We can't see them, but they're there suckin' up galaxies all around the universe to keep balance. Yin and Yang.
Do the same laws of matter apply for antimatter? For example, matter cannot be created or destroyed. If this is true for antimatter (which I'm not saying is true) then wouldn't that mean we are not actually creating antimatter in a particle accelerator, but just finding it? Does that mean that there's a parallel "Anti Universe"? To the people in that universe, would our matter be their antimatter; and when we harness antimatter in a particle accelerator, are they getting our matter in return?
@bizarredude101 - Chemistry, not physics? We never learned anything of that nature in chemistry.
Anyway, we learned energy cannot be created or destroyed, but I was just reading that energy can be converted to matter, and matter into energy, so what you were saying about matter not being destroyed would make sense. (Sorry!)
@chibiariel No, Chemistry. Chemistry said that matter cannot be created or destroyed. I think everybody knows that. Yes, it can be converted into energy (E=mc2), but that does not mean it is destroyed. Key word: converted. I learned this in chemistry, I don't know about you.
The same guy who came up with the idea that mass can be converted to energy, also believed that matter was never destroyed.
@chibiariel Oh I'm sorry, I didn't really understand what you were saying, I didn't read my original comment :/
Sorry about that one, but I hate to say it, I learned in chemistry in New York State that matter and energy cannot be created or destroyed. You can't tell me that I didn't. because I did!
SO, the Universe "explodes" into existence, sometime in the first minute MORE energy EXPLODES in (matter vs. antimatter) and then MORE matter is created, but not antimatter? Doesn't seem to make much sense.
Call me an idiot if you like, but just remember High and Mighty, its YOUR duty to educate, not berate.
It really is odd that billions of pounds worth of money is being pumped into this type of research, when there isn't actually a conceivable benefit from it, and it's only to quench a really small number of people's thirst for knowledge, which is, quite honestly, useless. Maybe in a few thousand years when we've elevated ourselves to a better species and not over 50% of our species live in extreme poverty - maybe then this sort of research will actually mean anything.
@MrShadyJeff Not really, if this project is successful, we could successfully develop warp drives and travel multitudes faster than the speed of light. Think of the minerals, the colonizable planets, the chance that we could make contact with another intelligent species. I find those benefits to have great meaning.
@MrShadyJeff You can't truly predict human nature.
Ask someone from the 50s what the future might hold and you would endlessly hear about totalitarianism, communism, aka the flavor of the week. In the end, each era speculates on human nature, and yet they never truly factor the relation that technology has on humanity. Sure, most technologies have been used for evil, but that is because the science did not catch up with the technology. Think of the internet. That gap is closing quickly.
@funnyhomeboy1 true, but there is a huge gap between modernising the world and what you are suggesting with warp drives and colonies, etc.
All I mean is that we can't truly progress as a a species with only a small minority understanding what is going on. I would rather see a resolution to current world problems than having two planets with massive problems.
@TheSleepChamber By that time we probably wouldn't need to mine for fossil fuels, so 'raping the planet' is kinda out of the question. For the most part we would probably take solar energy for the most part. It would be the most practical if given the most consideration technology-wise.
@funnyhomeboy1 We don't gut the Earth SOLELY for Fossil Fuels, and ravaging another planet for fossil fuels is probably not going to work too well. (You need organic life, first, and who says they are going to be carbon based, or seeing the same conditions as Earth?)
We vivisect our planet for metals, as well. And you can't tell me we won't need metal.
we actually have a fairly high amount of anitmatter. we use it PET- CT's, the P in PET, stands for pozitron, pozitron= electron antimatter. it creates low radiation gamma rays in the brain, which is how we get brain scans
perhaps the big bang was really a matter and anti-matter combining in large masses, instead of the big bang releasing the two and them destroying eachother later on
Exploding TSAR with Liquid Oxygen on Space with create a huge LHC (Anti-matter) that will create Black Hole traveling the SpaceShip to a huge funnel or tunnel to other dimension or Galaxies.
@lattask8er Well, most likely he would be watching a movie about anitmatter aswell, since they would call their own (anti)matter matter, and our matter antimatter. But the chance that there is an exact opposite universe of antimatter is very, very, very small. but the possibility of an universe made out of matter is very big.
Explosion, expansion, this is semantics depending on the unit of time because an explosion is simply a rapid expansion. It is surely not an explosion like any we are familiar with is it?
Is our own milky way galaxy expanding or contracting?
It is said that the farther celestial bodies are from us, then the faster they are moving away from us. Is this perception the reason we say the "universe is expanding?"
You can never reach the speed of light. That would require an infinite amount of energy. You could get close, say 90%. The Q-factor, a tangential line, dictates that as you reach the speed of light, the energy you use for propulsion start to add mass until you reach infinite mass.
QUOUTE: "the most expensive substance are antimatter (especially antiatoms like antihydrogen), at $1,750 trillion US Dollars (USD) per ounce, followed by hafnium and tantalum isomers, at about $480 million USD per ounce, and assorted exotic particles such as bottom quarks, which are in the same league as antimatter"
I would like to understand why it is said that all the matter in the universe was present at the "big bang." Also want to know if anyone thinks that any matter or energy has been created ongoing. Also want to know why the physical universe is thought to have began as an explosion rather than something more diminuitive. Anybody?
Is the Anti-Christ made up completely of antimatter? If Christ and the Anti-Christ decide to "Kiss and make up", should they hug one another? Is this why Good and Evil are always dueling? How do we know that Noah's wife was a blonde?...Because he caught her trying to smuggle 2 termites on board the Ark!
I don't know where this stereotype of British women being ugly came from. A lot of them look nice. Obviously I'm talking about the woman in this video.
These people are going to blow up the Earth by accident, they are going to accidentally cause an explosion 1,000,000,000,000,000 times that of a thermal nuclear explosion. It will make the atomic bombs dropped on Japan look like two small snake fire works. This is messing with technology beyond human ability to comprehend, this is opening the door to god and other worlds and dimensions and time travel. Mentally we need to evolve a few more hundred thousand years, or else kill ourselves now.
@MrGmodlol61 Yeah....but women shouldn't be scientists! Women should take care of the house, children, cook food,etc.. In my country is unheard of a woman scientist!
@MrGmodlol61 but women aren't equal to men! They aren't as strong and smart as men are! Very few women invented something usefull or contributed to the human development.
@kittykatro Men are stronger but most women are smarter...
Did you read what I type? Anyways, here's something that women are now working on now, if they get everything right, they can make very high progression with technology.
@MrGmodlol61 What did the women invent? How many women were geniuses? Did a woman invent the light-bulb or the computer? Did a woman write Shakespeare's plays?
@kittykatro ....and if you read history of those inventions, you would know that women couldn't invent those things without being labelled a "witch", well the lightbulb and shakespear's plays at least, the computer....well, it would have been impossible for a woman to get funding to develop such a thing back in the mid- 1800's
@novantha1 No...."genii" it's the plural from "genie" - a supernatural creature from Arab folklore. "Geniuses", not "geniouses" is the plural from "genius" - a person with exceptional intellectual ability, creativity, or originality, typically to a degree that is associated with the achievement of unprecedented insight -something that no woman could ever accomplish.
I wonder where the anti me is
MrSuperZangief 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
MrSuperZangief 2 weeks ago
Whatsa' Matta'?
FURdeRIO 2 weeks ago
What if we are made out of anti-matter... And matter is just the mirrored version of us O_O
blackOPSbeasty115 1 month ago
@blackOPSbeasty115 well,we humans just give phenomens a certain name to describe it better. it doesnt really matter if you say everything in our universe is made out of matter or antimatter,but we have to be made out of the same stuff like everything around us,because otherwise, there would be a painful reaction. haha
chouette96 2 weeks ago
a starwars analogy using jedi (being matter) and sith (being anti-matter) would have sufficed.haha
pHaZe017 1 month ago
I just never get why scientists have to do this. I mean, can they stop people from getting sick, or starving? That Matters. Million$ for their fun projects. There's anti-Matter.
sue200012 1 month ago
@sue200012 Scientists research this subject and many others because they want to know how the universe works. They constantly search for new discoveries, which brings new knowledge to our species. These "fun" projects that people are spending millions of dollars on will provide a greater knowledge of the universe that we call home. We know tons of stuff about the Earth and our Solar System, now it is time to expand into abyss even farther. Like the saying goes, "knowledge is power"!
avjoma0109 1 month ago
@sue200012 The problem is not with science: it's political. There is no food shortage. As for illness, are you not aware of all the great accomplishments science has made in the field of medicine?
quidproquo2004 1 month ago
@quidproquo2004 Yes, accomplishments, but U.S. chock full of scientists yet 37th in world health accd to WHO, and never a cancer cure. Hope finding the amazing purple people particle will be more fruitful. Thanks.
sue200012 1 month ago
@sue200012 "amazing purple people particle will be more fruitful". You clearly don't understand the point of science nor do you understand what it is. Science is the systematic pursuit of truth, employing reason, skepticism, falsifiability. Just because some dedicate their lives to understanding some aspects of nature without immediate gain, doesn't make it worthless. Some of the most important advancements were made by accident. No offense, but you need to go to the library
quidproquo2004 1 month ago
@quidproquo2004 Tell him or her to turn off their computer since the technology was partly developed based on principles derived from quantum mechanics.
movcrit 1 month ago
@quidproquo2004 No offense, but I'll never worship science or scientists. I'm thinkin about scientists who thought Lister was goofy for washing his hands before surgery (arrogant). That important advancements were made "by accident" tells me something too. Thanks.
sue200012 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
quidproquo2004 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sue200012 Your ignorance is offensive, though I don't blame you. You have no idea what science is: it has absolutely nothing to do with worship. Science is the systematic analysis of nature. Worship is letting someone else do your thinking for you.
"I'm thinkin about scientists who thought Lister was goofy for washing his hands before surgery (arrogant)."
Wrong again. In case you didn't realize this, it took time for the germ theory to be accepted. It's not an issue of arrogance.
quidproquo2004 2 weeks ago
@sue200012 LoL apparently there is so better way to finding the cure for cancer outside of science?
movcrit 1 month ago
@sue200012 thats because the US scientists for the large part are part of the US war based economy, and that is why the USA is uncontested #1 best military in the world, if all those scientists would stop designing f22s and nuclear submarines and satellites im sure their collective intelligence would be more then enough to solve world hunger, the energy crisis or even cure cancer... its just what they are told to do, USA uses its intelligence to build war machines and leads by force
101andrewj 2 weeks ago
@101andrewj I agree!
sue200012 2 weeks ago
@sue200012 well. you might be right with the point that we should try to stop these issues on earth. BUT its the majority of the people who are ignorant and selfish,so that this unfortunately does not work out... some people try.but not enough. anyways, its not the mistake of science. science is beauteful and amazing. im already said about the fact that i probably wont get to know all the truths about our existence etc. until i finally have to join the dead. :) but im fine with that
chouette96 2 weeks ago
@chouette96 I'll pray after your death you join the living! Then you'll know!!! :)
sue200012 2 weeks ago
but isn't our matter the antimatter of the antimatter.
rsjvdb 2 months ago
@rsjvdb AHHH so deep lol
random1ty 2 months ago
At 1:30 You say "WE THINK." But you should say, "WE HOPE." To lend purpose to your research. Why do you believe the CP VIOLATION is a near 50/50 split!? Where do you find substance to this claim? Would you agree or disagree that "Q" or charge has more to do with spin at the quantum scale? Therefore, spin (direction) depends on how you view it. The "question" that should be posed is: How do 'Matter Particles' acquire & preserve their spin, whilst operating effectively, in a quantum vacuum?
markakroll 2 months ago
My red world here, now, means more to me than your blue one. Let me show you.
hornick18 2 months ago
LHC start smelling at huge waste of money.
fernandop1 2 months ago
what if we are the antimatter and the 'antimatter' is really matter?
toddwhackett711 2 months ago
@toddwhackett711 Does it matter? See what I did there?
TheCrackbinge 2 months ago 5
This message has been brought to you by Epic.
TronPachioftheDynamo 2 months ago
This is the basic equation for Quantum Physics:(2+2=4)=(4=2+2)=(4=2-2)-(4=2-2)=0
NevaehBeatez 2 months ago
GOD ..
sparkandflame 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If I can only support you with your experiments, I would to make those religious people bow down before Science.
MrGreedIsGood 2 months ago
Off topic, she's hot.
On topic, are positrons (or any form of antimatter) being "made" or expelled above thunderclouds at the moment of a lightning strike? If so, are there any known projects that aim to try to harness and collect them? Do a Wikipedia search for 'lightning sprites'.
rkmugen 3 months ago
There is no antimatter in the universe, after the big bang, all the matter anhialated the anti matter. So technically, in our universe, there is no antimatter. If string theorems are right, there might be other universes where antimatter won the war against matter moments after the big bang. Don't forget, there are 9 universes.
NerfFrostMages 3 months ago
@NerfFrostMages this is just one theory! I mean, we were even able to produce antimatter in the LHC just next to me x) and they were even able to hold it for a pretty long time (i think milliseconds). So how can you say that there is no antimatter in the universe, which is billion times bigger than everything you can imagine, and where are billion times more energetic events which could produce lots of antimatter .
DarkSmith91 3 months ago
@NerfFrostMages Do you work at the LHC?
NerfFrostMages 3 months ago
it has to be inbalanced in order for it (the universe)to exist, or maybe the anti matter is still out there in cysts waiting for certain conditions to occur so that it can be released and cancel everything out again, either way we are all part of the whole, you dont need to go to space to figure out existence, look within and save some rocket fuel
nomorejournos 3 months ago
I paused the video as soon as I heard a womans voice, why is she out of the kitchen?!
wakaboomnick 3 months ago
GOD
Torrezd16 3 months ago
@Torrezd16 Is Good.
bmbirdsong 3 months ago
by breaking the law of physics; the law of conservation of matter. if matter was created without any sacrifice of the given limit of matter, then world or universe will explode in that magnitude.
darkangelcloud7 3 months ago
Why is the Rutherford model of the atom used instead of the Bohr model? -.-
ohemeffgeee 3 months ago
Recommended reading if your into this is Antimatter by Frank Close.
Until we find a natural source of antimatter left in the universe, it wont be used to fuel spaceships or create bombs of any kind. It takes far more energy to create (and store!) antimatter then the energy from its annihilation is worth. At our current rate of production, filling a toy balloon with antihydrogen would take longer than the universe has existed!
pyrocujo 4 months ago
14*
Musicalabionda 4 months ago
@BillyTrollsYou well i heard that anti matter could be used to fuel future intersteller space travel, im not a scientist, i just heard that
juki0h 5 months ago
@juki0h It's a joke lol..get it? Matter :D
b33p3rz 3 months ago
@b33p3rz i thought it was one of those sentences where they combine an important word with a question.
juki0h 3 months ago
Rather than saying that "matter" is made up of particles, why not simply say that all particles are made of "matter" as though matter inferred a single fundamental entity that manifests physical reality? That would infer matter and anti-matter are actually made of the same entity since they both simply convert each other into what we call energy; that would make energy the same stuff as matter! Why make things so complex?
MsWanderer1 5 months ago
Today you know tomorrow you die .
gamer3386 5 months ago 9
just had a look at my as physics textbook... :(
ctravih 5 months ago
okey matter and anti matter just BOOOM!, but where the hell is the antimatter?, can i buy 1g of it :D
TVsansantiago 5 months ago
@TVsansantiago
you should ask the scientist at CERN. probably you could buy it if you paid 20billion dollars and wait a while. just tell me when you buy it so i know to move my ass to the other side of earth.
PanORotta 5 months ago
@TVsansantiago 1 gram (1 mole) of antihydrogen will cost you 63.5 TRILLION dollars bro.
TheTeamBeige 5 months ago
@TheTeamBeige its worth it haha....
disturbedlink1 4 months ago
Comment removed
JosiahSCooper 5 months ago
I like it how retards here are talking about Tara instead of the actual video, WTF is wrong with you guys?
Are you here just because you saw a woman in the thumbnail?
MrGmodlol61 6 months ago
cp is charge parity rite?
XxcombatstormxX 6 months ago
@XxcombatstormxX yes, most prolly she reffers to CPT(charge/parity/time) symmetry, altho i'm an engineer not a physicist so i might be wrong.
Kamadeva01 6 months ago
@Kamadeva01 thnx :D
XxcombatstormxX 3 months ago
But what if the matter we think we are is antimatter and antimatter is matter
TheNiggerXavi 6 months ago
@TheNiggerXavi Impossible, since we already gave one set of substance the name of matter and the other anti-matter. Our definitions reflect things, not the other way around.
BloodskullMannoroth 6 months ago
antimatter also have been predicted by chinese..the ying and yang
fruitygumball 6 months ago
How the scientist became so genius to found this theory?I hope i can
Exa2312 6 months ago
wow, nice sideburns........
vhulheim 7 months ago
I think the reason why there is still so much matter left, and it defeated antimatter, is that matter is faster or easier to create than antimatter.
Phr33Pur3 7 months ago
2:50 - 2:53 : iron man's arc reactor
andrew789987 7 months ago
Antimatter is made with motas.
Kuakusi 7 months ago
sooooo, if i find anti matter and put it with matter, i can haz mega nuclear bomb?
theoxtheory 7 months ago
"My paychecks and Bills are like matter and anti-matter 1:06, they annihilate each other, but without the flashes and lights"
JMAV57 7 months ago 24
if there is an infinite number of parallel universe, is it safely assume that one of the parallel universe is filled with anti matter? if so, there is an another me in that universe that is composed of anti matter. WE CAN ANNIHILATE EACH OTHER!!!
MidnightRedemption 7 months ago
So... how about instead of wasting all this money in this Antimatter stuff to spend it in the "Aetheric" technology that Tesla developed and succeeded? Oh wait! Unlimited free energy from anywhere in the Universe? Anti-gravity? Super luminal speeds? The Aether is ancient and forever new. One day!
jatigre1 7 months ago
Does anyone know the name of the song being used?
mirbez 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A classless,moneyless,stateless communities of humanity in cooperation to take care of our needs and well being , expressing our creative energies in freedom of being. Capitalism is the manipulation of resources and technology for the private gain of a few in a monetary system that enslaves immense humanity in wage slavery of useless employment system that dehumanises and denies our human creative potential for a world of harmony within and without.
arzoyan 7 months ago
antimater=H2o..need new technology
delevans 7 months ago
yeah...some guys with matter and antimatter can easily destroy the whole plannet earth..i can go sleep now :P
benjaminbreeg22 8 months ago
@benjaminbreeg22
Relax, it would take billions of year making just half a gram of anti-matter ( with the technology we have today )
AtlasRedux 7 months ago
@AtlasRedux Antimatter has already been made and captured at CERN. Look up.
pravinpatil411 7 months ago
@pravinpatil411 You're both right, actually :D
From Wkipedia's article on antimatter: "CERN can make 10^7 anti-protons per minute. Assuming an 100% conversion of antiprotons to antihydrogen, it would take 100 billion years to produce 1 gram or 1 mole of antihydrogen (approximately 6.02×10^23 atoms of antihydrogen)."
StrikaAmaru 7 months ago
Remind to tell scientists to invent a 50-kg MAM Bomb. I could blow up the Eastern Hempishere! HAHA! Fuck you world! Now [Insert here] owns the world!
SniperViper1000 8 months ago
Space Shuttle Endeavour launches on its final mission, delivering the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer for installation on the International Space Station.
Its experiments will help researchers study the formation of the Universe and search for evidence of dark matter as well as investigate ANTIMATTER!
skuloop 8 months ago
shes too smug...she doesnt know if everything is matter or anti matter.....photons are but a massless!! wave particle
3tangle3 8 months ago
@3tangle3 u r a fucking retard!!!
HypercowXYZ 8 months ago
@HypercowXYZ coming from that 'username' I take it as a compliment. I am in biofuel research....you are probly an unemployed bum...now fuck off tramp lol
3tangle3 8 months ago
I Just got mindfucked... I hope she was wearing a condom :(
AL3XANDRI0 8 months ago
@BillyTrollsYou lol
manq211 8 months ago
Hmm... Come to think of it. Isotopes created out of anti-matter...
I wonder what kind of new materials we would be able to get.
Bastiest 8 months ago
when 1 kg of matter and 1 kg of antimatter come into contact, it has the same effect as a Chuck Norris roundhouse kick
jaspertheking4life 8 months ago
Matter and Antimatter are still in equal balance. Just because we can see Matter and can't see the Antimatter doesn't mean it's not any less. If so, Newton's 3rd law has been proven wrong. Theres always a balance of things. Antimatter has probably taken form as the Black Holes. We can't see them, but they're there suckin' up galaxies all around the universe to keep balance. Yin and Yang.
potheadpickle 8 months ago
Do the same laws of matter apply for antimatter? For example, matter cannot be created or destroyed. If this is true for antimatter (which I'm not saying is true) then wouldn't that mean we are not actually creating antimatter in a particle accelerator, but just finding it? Does that mean that there's a parallel "Anti Universe"? To the people in that universe, would our matter be their antimatter; and when we harness antimatter in a particle accelerator, are they getting our matter in return?
bizarredude101 9 months ago
@bizarredude101 - I think you mean ENERGY cannot be created or destroyed, not matter.
chibiariel 6 months ago
@chibiariel No, matter cannot be created or destroyed. Think back to your 9th grade chemistry class....
bizarredude101 6 months ago
@bizarredude101 - Chemistry, not physics? We never learned anything of that nature in chemistry.
Anyway, we learned energy cannot be created or destroyed, but I was just reading that energy can be converted to matter, and matter into energy, so what you were saying about matter not being destroyed would make sense. (Sorry!)
chibiariel 6 months ago
@chibiariel No, Chemistry. Chemistry said that matter cannot be created or destroyed. I think everybody knows that. Yes, it can be converted into energy (E=mc2), but that does not mean it is destroyed. Key word: converted. I learned this in chemistry, I don't know about you.
The same guy who came up with the idea that mass can be converted to energy, also believed that matter was never destroyed.
bizarredude101 6 months ago
@bizarredude101 - No, we never learned that in chemistry.
'...but that does not mean it is destroyed.' - Yes, that's what I was saying.
chibiariel 6 months ago
@chibiariel Oh I'm sorry, I didn't really understand what you were saying, I didn't read my original comment :/
Sorry about that one, but I hate to say it, I learned in chemistry in New York State that matter and energy cannot be created or destroyed. You can't tell me that I didn't. because I did!
bizarredude101 6 months ago
@bizarredude101 - lol, No, I didn't learn that in chemistry; I'm not saying you didn't.
It's okay; my 'sorry' was for sounding like a prick or similar, I think that could have been confused for, 'Sorry, you're wrong,' or something.
chibiariel 6 months ago
@chibiariel Ha yeh I kinda interpreted it that way :/ It's OK though
bizarredude101 6 months ago
SO, the Universe "explodes" into existence, sometime in the first minute MORE energy EXPLODES in (matter vs. antimatter) and then MORE matter is created, but not antimatter? Doesn't seem to make much sense.
Call me an idiot if you like, but just remember High and Mighty, its YOUR duty to educate, not berate.
TheSleepChamber 9 months ago
Lol, your machine didn't work out to well. lmao
XxFightinDirtyxX 9 months ago
"tipped the balance in favor of matter"
from our point of view but from anti-matter's point of view are we the 'losers' in that battle?
TiqueO6 9 months ago
i hope u dont blow up the world in that process (recreating the big bang) Doc.......
LikableDesi 9 months ago
@LikableDesi E=MC^2 - The amount they put in is in proportion to the amount they get out.
Mandragara 9 months ago
It really is odd that billions of pounds worth of money is being pumped into this type of research, when there isn't actually a conceivable benefit from it, and it's only to quench a really small number of people's thirst for knowledge, which is, quite honestly, useless. Maybe in a few thousand years when we've elevated ourselves to a better species and not over 50% of our species live in extreme poverty - maybe then this sort of research will actually mean anything.
MrShadyJeff 9 months ago
@MrShadyJeff Not really, if this project is successful, we could successfully develop warp drives and travel multitudes faster than the speed of light. Think of the minerals, the colonizable planets, the chance that we could make contact with another intelligent species. I find those benefits to have great meaning.
funnyhomeboy1 9 months ago
@funnyhomeboy1 what have you been reading.
Hamilton? Banks? Asimov? All astounding imaginations I know, let alone it all being developed in our lifetime, non of which we will see.
Read some dystopian novels, you might find they'll give you more of a taster to what the future holds.
MrShadyJeff 9 months ago
@MrShadyJeff You can't truly predict human nature.
Ask someone from the 50s what the future might hold and you would endlessly hear about totalitarianism, communism, aka the flavor of the week. In the end, each era speculates on human nature, and yet they never truly factor the relation that technology has on humanity. Sure, most technologies have been used for evil, but that is because the science did not catch up with the technology. Think of the internet. That gap is closing quickly.
funnyhomeboy1 9 months ago
@funnyhomeboy1 true, but there is a huge gap between modernising the world and what you are suggesting with warp drives and colonies, etc.
All I mean is that we can't truly progress as a a species with only a small minority understanding what is going on. I would rather see a resolution to current world problems than having two planets with massive problems.
MrShadyJeff 9 months ago
@funnyhomeboy1 tis a shame anti matter is the most expensive object ever at 62.5 trillion per gram :(
jack29292 9 months ago
@funnyhomeboy1 "Think of the minerals, the colonizable planets"
Yaaay! Because raping another planet should be the ONLY reason we leave ours! Earth is going to be a dead useless husk when we're done, anyways.
TheSleepChamber 9 months ago
@TheSleepChamber By that time we probably wouldn't need to mine for fossil fuels, so 'raping the planet' is kinda out of the question. For the most part we would probably take solar energy for the most part. It would be the most practical if given the most consideration technology-wise.
funnyhomeboy1 9 months ago
@funnyhomeboy1 We don't gut the Earth SOLELY for Fossil Fuels, and ravaging another planet for fossil fuels is probably not going to work too well. (You need organic life, first, and who says they are going to be carbon based, or seeing the same conditions as Earth?)
We vivisect our planet for metals, as well. And you can't tell me we won't need metal.
TheSleepChamber 9 months ago
we actually have a fairly high amount of anitmatter. we use it PET- CT's, the P in PET, stands for pozitron, pozitron= electron antimatter. it creates low radiation gamma rays in the brain, which is how we get brain scans
bazzaman911 9 months ago
@bazzaman911 its a positron mate.
MrShadyJeff 9 months ago
@MrShadyJeff shhhhhhh
bazzaman911 9 months ago
she just got hotter after that explanation
digerpaji 10 months ago
Will it blend?
LTF85199 10 months ago
Can you make sandwichs from antimatter?
Nijokaz 10 months ago
This anti matter thing is all great and that but it's still not going to make my sandwich IS it now?
Ironhearted02 10 months ago
@Ironhearted02 I guess you COULD try to toast your snack with I don't know....a few pounds of antimatter?
lordanjan1 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Ironhearted02 I guess you COULD try to toast your snack with I don't know....a few pounds of antimatter?
lordanjan1 10 months ago
They have now found that large thunderstorms actually produces anti matter!
jamiehasnomercy 10 months ago
i just got burned by the patronising voice she pushed down my ears...
wiihaward94 10 months ago
perhaps the big bang was really a matter and anti-matter combining in large masses, instead of the big bang releasing the two and them destroying eachother later on
720moorhsum 10 months ago
The prettiest physicist I've ever seen. And I've seen a lot of physicists..
CodeStain 10 months ago
she's kinda pretty
3931Kong 10 months ago
fuck i got a brain haemorrhage!!
bluekrim 11 months ago
@bluekrim Good for you that means you learn something
rsexplorer20 10 months ago
this lady has a freaking awesome voice!
calebp9503 11 months ago
hey guys...im goin to masturbate now
TaskerFilms 11 months ago
@TaskerFilms woot
Airehcaz 11 months ago
who else is high right now?
IUtrumpetboy 11 months ago 93
@IUtrumpetboy Not high, but drunk! XD
OmegaDude22 8 months ago
if everything was antimatter, even us, would it be the same as a matter world
RAIDENISLIGHTNING 11 months ago
1:38 what if there was a larger amount of Antimatter?
NanouoMusic 11 months ago
@NanouoMusic
Exploding TSAR with Liquid Oxygen on Space with create a huge LHC (Anti-matter) that will create Black Hole traveling the SpaceShip to a huge funnel or tunnel to other dimension or Galaxies.
MrVrsilvestrejr2008 11 months ago
How do the dilithium crystals interact within the matter-anti-matter reactor? And does warp speed really tear the fabric of space-time?
irchristo 11 months ago
So what this lady is saying is, a anti me is sitting at a anti computer watching a anti youtube video about matter?
lattask8er 1 year ago
@lattask8er Well, most likely he would be watching a movie about anitmatter aswell, since they would call their own (anti)matter matter, and our matter antimatter. But the chance that there is an exact opposite universe of antimatter is very, very, very small. but the possibility of an universe made out of matter is very big.
TheBadkamer 11 months ago
antimatter & dark matter?
maalaea 1 year ago
@maalaea Im definite not and expert but i know antimatter and dark matter are totally different things
koffypr 11 months ago
@koffypr that's cool.
maalaea 11 months ago
@ProjectDecade
Explosion, expansion, this is semantics depending on the unit of time because an explosion is simply a rapid expansion. It is surely not an explosion like any we are familiar with is it?
Is our own milky way galaxy expanding or contracting?
It is said that the farther celestial bodies are from us, then the faster they are moving away from us. Is this perception the reason we say the "universe is expanding?"
irchristo 1 year ago
@ProjectDecade
Yes, "nothing lasts forever" but what about something? I am not sure that we know that all matter, energy, space and time is finite.
Did matter begin at the big bang?
It is said that Time began at the big bang. This is not a fact or is it?
In an expanding universe space is being created. Or is it? Or is the universe "expanding" into something other than newly created space?
irchristo 1 year ago
so had there not been a slight imbalance between matter and antimatter, nothing in the universe would exist??
creamyfilling102 1 year ago
MATTER = VANILLA
ANTIMATTER = CHOCOLATE
mkay1500 1 year ago
You can never reach the speed of light. That would require an infinite amount of energy. You could get close, say 90%. The Q-factor, a tangential line, dictates that as you reach the speed of light, the energy you use for propulsion start to add mass until you reach infinite mass.
Simchip1964 1 year ago
@Simchip1964 You can. You just have to be massless
RSign321 1 year ago
if we can harnes antimatter i brlive we could modify it in order to make space ships go light speed!
SuperJumper94 1 year ago
QUOUTE: "the most expensive substance are antimatter (especially antiatoms like antihydrogen), at $1,750 trillion US Dollars (USD) per ounce, followed by hafnium and tantalum isomers, at about $480 million USD per ounce, and assorted exotic particles such as bottom quarks, which are in the same league as antimatter"
RandyFoxKiller 1 year ago
Michio kaku agrees....
57thdarkspear 1 year ago
thanks for the video, highly educational!
Ivalices85 1 year ago
(>")>
xXWierdOneXx 1 year ago
I would like to understand why it is said that all the matter in the universe was present at the "big bang." Also want to know if anyone thinks that any matter or energy has been created ongoing. Also want to know why the physical universe is thought to have began as an explosion rather than something more diminuitive. Anybody?
irchristo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Damn this lady is smart, she must have a book case in the kitchen.
h4l03rul3z 1 year ago 28
doesn't matter......
nfexp 1 year ago
Is the Anti-Christ made up completely of antimatter? If Christ and the Anti-Christ decide to "Kiss and make up", should they hug one another? Is this why Good and Evil are always dueling? How do we know that Noah's wife was a blonde?...Because he caught her trying to smuggle 2 termites on board the Ark!
adamrspears1981 1 year ago
Get ready for antimatternukes :D
TheBeeFart 1 year ago
I don't know where this stereotype of British women being ugly came from. A lot of them look nice. Obviously I'm talking about the woman in this video.
UnchainTheNight1 1 year ago
parallel universe
AcidRaZor 1 year ago
Recreating the Big Bang? That sounds extremely dangerous. One malfunction and we're all dead.
BlueAuraWolf 1 year ago
the big bang sounds like a fairy tale :)
mrgermancowboy 1 year ago
These people are going to blow up the Earth by accident, they are going to accidentally cause an explosion 1,000,000,000,000,000 times that of a thermal nuclear explosion. It will make the atomic bombs dropped on Japan look like two small snake fire works. This is messing with technology beyond human ability to comprehend, this is opening the door to god and other worlds and dimensions and time travel. Mentally we need to evolve a few more hundred thousand years, or else kill ourselves now.
AwakeSlave 1 year ago
@AwakeSlave kill yourself make the example.
thexmario 1 year ago
@AwakeSlave I'd honestly rather get obliterated in that explosion than die at a ripe old age. I'm just saying, it would be awesome.
PhRiZoN 1 year ago
evolutionists don't matter...ha i made a funny
abobjenkins 1 year ago
I bet that lady is still a virgin! She should find herself a man and leave all this matter-antimatter nonsense!
kittykatro 1 year ago
@kittykatro I bet you're an idiot.
First of all, why would you even care?
And second, matter and anti-matter is no where non sense.
So shut up and try learning something instead of talking shit about some ones hard work.
MrGmodlol61 6 months ago
@MrGmodlol61 Just look at her, man! No make-up, her hair is a mess, shitty clothes,etc..
Also playing with antimatter could destroy the whole world -this is dangerous stuff and man shouldn't be allowed to mess with it!
kittykatro 6 months ago
@kittykatro Again, you shouldn't even care about how she looks, this isn't even related to the video.
Second, they're scientists, from ALL OVER THE WORLD, they know what they're doing.
MrGmodlol61 6 months ago
@MrGmodlol61 Yeah....but women shouldn't be scientists! Women should take care of the house, children, cook food,etc.. In my country is unheard of a woman scientist!
kittykatro 6 months ago
@kittykatro Who the hell told you that bullcrap?
Its well known that most women are smarter then men, what kind country is that anyway?
MrGmodlol61 6 months ago
@kittykatro Also, not only women take care of the house and what not, have you been living under a rock?
Its 2011, everyone is equal...
MrGmodlol61 6 months ago
@MrGmodlol61 but women aren't equal to men! They aren't as strong and smart as men are! Very few women invented something usefull or contributed to the human development.
kittykatro 6 months ago
@kittykatro Men are stronger but most women are smarter...
Did you read what I type? Anyways, here's something that women are now working on now, if they get everything right, they can make very high progression with technology.
MrGmodlol61 6 months ago
@MrGmodlol61 What did the women invent? How many women were geniuses? Did a woman invent the light-bulb or the computer? Did a woman write Shakespeare's plays?
kittykatro 6 months ago
@kittykatro ....and if you read history of those inventions, you would know that women couldn't invent those things without being labelled a "witch", well the lightbulb and shakespear's plays at least, the computer....well, it would have been impossible for a woman to get funding to develop such a thing back in the mid- 1800's
novantha1 6 months ago
@kittykatro oh and i forgot to mention...geniouses isn't a word, it's genii...
novantha1 6 months ago
@novantha1 No...."genii" it's the plural from "genie" - a supernatural creature from Arab folklore. "Geniuses", not "geniouses" is the plural from "genius" - a person with exceptional intellectual ability, creativity, or originality, typically to a degree that is associated with the achievement of unprecedented insight -something that no woman could ever accomplish.
kittykatro 6 months ago