LOL!!!! When will the Russians come up with an original idea of their own, without having to steal it from the United States! More than half of his designs are knock off's of Amercian aircraft...the rest, just models that never even made it to the prototype stage. When will Russia build a car that can complete on the world maket? Oh! I guess you'll have to steal that too! LOL!!! Oh yes, the last plane in your video is a copy of the American B-58 Hustler! Rip Off!
@cannrickyf14 The Osprey was NOT the first tiltrotor and that concept looks nothing like the Osprey anyway. Vague visual similarities do not mean "copies". I think you will find that when you compare aircraft intended for similar roles many similarities crop up, regardless of where they are from (I wonder why...).
@cannrickyf14 Jesus l, This project was on Draw board long before , B1, B2, F22 was just idea. Concorde has parallel time envelop whit Russian version, Just Ospray, and some part of black bird is involved in drawings.But that is same thing like US of A people love to say, "PAKFA is copy of F22".
Looks like he designed a lot of cool planes but the USSR didn't have the money or technology to fund or build them. Too bad the Soviets decided to be assholes after WWII.. It didn't get them anywhere.
Начнем с того, что все эти конструкции создавались на деньги централизовано отбираемые у граждан СССР. это было. Мое детство тоже прошло в СССР. В США, и на Луну отправили несколько экспедиций, и люди жили в 10 и более раз лучше чем в СССР. В СССР -и люди жили хуже соответственно в 10 раз, что в СССР "прохлопали " сами считайте.
Nice models. I think I spotted a B-57, B-70 Valkyrie and a B-2 in there. It's unfortunate that Vladimir was never given the opportunity to build many of his designs. It seem the is the USSR as in the US, chemical rockets had a hold on space launches,
why paying tribute to the russian scum ,who only steals patents?the russians should stick to drinking bc its the only thing they are good at-and realize once and for all ,that they dont belong in the creativity class-sorry.
1st in Space, 1st space station...no creativity? Have you even heard of Tchaikovsky? Although it is true the USSR did reverse engineer a lot of things, the Russian people are as creative as any other.
@UHaveTeaUHaveLife Russians created: -Radio -First bicycle 1801 -Electric welding -Digital Technology was coined in Russia how and first PC in 1968 -Electric motor and First Electric car in 1899 -TV set in 1907 -Modern type of parachute -Nuclear Power Plants -Table of chemical elements -Laser -H-bomb -First machine gun in 1913 -Incandescent -diving apparatus in 1871 -Cable telegraph line -The optical sight -Electric welding And sooooo many others what do you use NOW.JUST LIMIT WORDS IN MESSAGE
Yeah, like the US never stole patents... Read the story of Thomas Edison and other famous "inventors" and come back with your tail between your legs, dumbass.
@TheNoob978, what you are writing about? What a piece of propagandist' crap? USSR was like mom and dad to the people? Did you came from another planet? Have you heard of GULAG where milions have died, have you heard of Byelomorkanal? Or you live in some soviet fairy tale paradise series illustrated in Komsomolskaya Pravda? Genocide country - that was the soviet "papa-i-mama". Horrible lie!
@joannawie "Have you heard of GULAG where milions have died"
It`s bullshit. Yankees stupid propagand. ГУЛАГ (Главное Упарвление Лагерями actualy). It`s not one place. It`s sompthing like United States Department of Justice Criminal Division. It was system of prison and prison security. Nothing else.
@ViciousCritique obvious troll is obvious, go to back celebrating new year, better yet, grab some books and read them- u will need it to get to college, or else you will spend your entire life working at Hardee's. U mad jelly fag?
@ViciousCritique wow... just wow.. You sir/mam are a full blown retard. Try talking to the rest of the community and I when you have reached the standard of a normal, non- retarded person.
@ViciousCritique may I ask.. Are you 14? or just so dumb? look at this video..there are not many American plane that looks like what you see in it.. And the Americans have nothing similar to Antonov An-225 for example..
Sorry to brake it to you kid.. there is actually nothing interesting or great about your precious country that others have´t done to..
@888explorer Your profile says that you are in Latvia. Since Latvia was one of the countries that was occupied by the Soviets, I have to assume from your attitude that you are not a real Latvian, but one of the criminal Soviet occupiers who didn't want to go home to your uncivilized dump of a country when Latvia became free.
если был так плох СССР то почему так много было достижений....мы были на равных с США...а теперь мы страна третьего мира с остатками ядерного оружия и технологий СССР
@a7a7a7a100 The USSR might have been on par with the US in terms of military capability and academics, but in every other respect it was always a third world country. If Russia can ever establish true democracy, it will hopefully join the "first world".
@amateurphilosopher вам дает хорошо жить не демократия а мировой капитал который живет на территории США.и который вы охраняете...если завтра капитал скажет мы улучшим вам жизнь в 2раза всем жителям США но вы молитесь на нас как на богов вы согласитесь и будете называть не демократия а БОГИ...
@888explorer Perhaps the USA has more prisoners than any other country in the world because we are better at catching criminals. In some countries, most of the criminals end up in the government. Democracy for Indians? Here in the US, Indians have as much right to vote as anyone else.
@amateurphilosopher Wow..some great rights they have..to VOTE :))..they are so lucky then, sounds like Orwell 1984 Do you know what kind of classes of people and what ethnicity`s and colors are 95% in USA jails !? Poor, Black people, Indians, Latinos. Some criminals you have :) people who got nothing to do and nothing to lose, and got no money for College.In some countries criminals are in government but in some countries they have killers of 3-rd worlds people.
@OPworldwideIA США самая экономически развитая страна в мире уже больше 150 лет. У них инжинеры живут в особняках, где у каждого члена семьи есть своя машина. Вспомни , как мы жили. Калашников (изобрёл АК-47)жил в полусгнившей двушке, которому Американцы предлагали особняк и машину с водителем. У нас ничего не было кроме армии. Мы все были нищими.Страна тонула в очередях и дифиците.Я знаю историю своей Страны. Я жил в СССР. Всё помню. Страна была сильная, но люди были нищие.
@TheNoob978 Государство было для народа,как мама и папа.Всё было бесплатно, работать чуть-ли не силой заставляли. После развала люди оказались беспомощными, сидят дома и сами себя жалеют, Советский Союз вспоминают. Жалко вас, тяжело вам в жизни придётся.
@TheNoob978 Многие вспоминают СССР хорошим словом и я в том числе, потому-что там прошло моё детство, но вряд-ли кто-нибудь согласился бы прожить свою жизнь сначала в Советском Союзе.Россия не идеальная Страна,но это наша Родина. Если мы все только скулить будем,то наша Родина ещё 30 лет в жопе будет.
@alexandr3384 И все что ты говоришь это Горбачевщина в 80-е годы.Очереди и дефицит это побочный эффект перестройки. То что говоришь про ученых, мягко говоря неправда. В СССР ученые, учителя, рабочие были привилегированным классом, им платили большие деньги (по крайней мере до Горбачева). если так нравится США, никто тебя не держит.
@TheNoob978 Ты помнишь, что было ,когда поднялся железный занавес? Для нас весь мир был как другая планета.Одежда, машины, видеомагнитафоны, даже еда, всё было в новинку.Жили под замком, как катаржане.Не говори мне, что у нас всё было.Привилегии по тем временам-это квартира без очереди,или гос.машина с водителем.Если у тебя ностальгия, езжай в Северную Корею-СССР в миниатюре.
@alexandr3384 А как они стали богатыми наживаясь на войне других стран.Если бы они черпнули хоть десятую часть тех войн,что вела Россия обороняясь он вторжений ,то они бы захлебнулись.Это уж точно.
@OPworldwideIA Мы тратили миллиарды на вооружение, а у самих не было ни комбайнов, ни тракторов.Зато тюрем и лагерей было больше чем в любой другой стране.
@HighAltitudeAttitude Moreover. The speech presented here by this primitive boor is a clean representation of traditional american slogan: "if you are so clever, why you are so poor". This belief makes average american an especially loyal servants of any rich man: they really think that their poverty is the result of their natural stupidity. And in some point of view it is true, because of only idiots could swallow such a nonsense.
@HighAltitudeAttitude I thought you would better not thought at all. It is not your profile. Take another hamburger and keep silence until the state debt made by "the american innovative contributors" hasn't yet overestimated the number of atoms in the universe. To live at another's expense is not such a new trick as you think, cowboy.
@spacemanvw Only a fool would say that the USA, with hundreds of far-flung bases all over the world, never does anything wrong. (Especially with a crazed African communist as "commander-in-chief"). The US mlitary only does what it's told to do by politicians, who are not known for their wisdom. In spite of that, the US has used its "toys" to do a lot of good, such as saving Europe in 3 wars, trying to save SE asia from communism, liberating a billion people by defeating the Soviets, etc.
In WW1 USA saved not Europe itself, but some (not all) Antanta countries.
In WW2 USA really "saved" western Europe from Soviet influence, you are right.
But what is third war? Cold war? US army defeated SU army in cold war? Good grass.
Of course, you could believe that "USA saved Europe from communism". It is a big question, did Europe need to be saved, but let it be. You could believe even in flying pasta monster.
@perlghost In WW1 the US couldn't save ALL of Europe, because part of Europe was the aggressor (The Central powers). The US saved Europe by helping defeat the Central powers.
In WW2 the US didn't save Europe from Soviet influence - it was the Marshall Plan AFTER WW2 that did that.
The "third war" (sorry I had to be brief because of the 500 character limit) was indeed the Cold war. Former Soviet generals have since admitted that it was Pres. Reagan's SDI that led to the end of the cold war.
I think you have a incorrect view of the reality. Chinese also invent and keep getting better @ it. There are more new engineers in china each year then anywhere else.
Your maybe from the USA, almost all american rockets engines are derived from the RD-180 russian invented rocket engine.
@ferkeap American rocket engines are NOT based on the RD-180. NASA is currently importing this engine for use on its Atlas rocket, because it is more efficient than conventional engines (at the cost of greater complexity). The US knows how to design rocket engines. The F-1 engine that powered the Saturn V moon rocket is still the most powerful engine ever built - and it's more than 40 years old!
Thank you for letting everybody know what a dumbass you are! The most powerful engine ever built is the Russian RD-170. Get you facts straight. The reason NASA uses RD-180 is because it replaces three engines in Atlas with just one RD-180. Do the math.
@larry81076 Comparing the RD-170 to the F-1 is misleading. According to wikipedia, some people consider the RD-170 to be a cluster of 4 engines, rather than a single engine. The reason the RD-170 uses 4 combustion chambers is because the russians never could figure out how to maintain stable combustion in a single large engine - something NASA figured out back in 1961! In spite of all that, the RD-170 still just barely manages to beat the F-1 - 1.697 million lbs. thrust vs 1.522 for the F-1.
"Really misleading" according to whom , you? You can put four mufflers on your car but you will still have only one engine. 1 set of turbines and pumps, i think it's pretty clear that it's a single engine. I know the author of the wikipedia article wanted to make US look good, but sometimes you got to use your head a little. Also 1.697 > 1.522 , no reason to deny that RD-170 is more powerful.
@larry81076 Not really. The reason most piston engines have multiple cylinders is for smoother running and minimizing the mass of the flywheel. These reasons do not apply to rocket engines. Using several combustion chambers in a rocket instead of one big one of equivalent power reduces thermal efficiency and adds weight because more material is required.
@larry81076 I'm afraid Wikipedia may feel insulted by your assertion that they are pro-American. That is not their reputation. Anyway, the combustion chamber of a liquid-fueled rocket engine has always been the most difficult part to design. The fact that you have to cluster four small ones to meet your requirements indicates that you are not capable of designing one big one, which would be the more efficient design.
You started with a false statement about the most powerful rocket engine, then you veered off into discussion about engines, and now you are claiming that a combustion chamber is the most difficult part of design. Is it so hard to admit that you have made a false statement? If you have ever written a research paper then you should know the reason why wikipedia should never be in your cited sources. (also, in the article about F1, "some people" should have been a red flag).
If you want to look at the marvel of engineering of 1970s that your country can't repeat even now check out the NK-33 (the highest thrust-to-weight ratio of any Earth-launchable rocket engine). Also where did you get that the Russians could never figure out how to maintain stable combustion in a single large engine? NK-33 is not small at all.
@larry81076 The NK-33 is such a "marvel of engineering" that it has spent most of its life stored in warehouses, and has never actually been used on a real spaceflight. I wonder why - perhaps it conjures up memories of its predecessor - the NK-15 - which was the cause of of four consecutive disasters in the USSR's four attempts to launch their N-1 moon rocket. The NK-33 may not be "small", but at only 338,000 lbs. thrust, it's certainly not in the same class as the biggest engines.
@SapperK9 It's no secret that the Germans made major contributions to the US space program (also the USSR's). As I once heard someone boast, "OUR German scientists are better than THEIR German scientists!" But seriously, the US had plenty of home-grown talent in the aerospace business. Don't forget that Robert Goddard was the first to build a practical liquid-fueled rocket, and Wherner Von Braun has credited Goddard with teaching him a lot about rocketry in the 1930's.
And the US without being given stuff by the British and stealing German rocket scientists in Operation Paperclip would still be using steam traction. Unlike the Russkies which built their rockets themselves. Oh and Goddard (the US rocket scientists in the 1930s) was inspired by - Konstantin Tsiolkovsky.
@52111centrumcz What a nonsense communist bullshit you are spewing ....russian scientists were always inferior if u compare them with german , british or US ones.
Arent u a Czech ?? I saw over yahoo news Vaclav Havel died ....last defender of freedom for the czechs .
Look up who Konstantin Tsiolkovksy was. He wasn't a communist, he in fact died before the Soviet Union was formed. And don't bash Russians, just because they're Russian. I don't like their government, but I give credit where its due; You don't mind using the Mendelev table of the elements as a scientific tool and reject it just because it was put together as a concept by a Russian do you? Such hatred is stupid and non-sensical.
Oh and Havel; he was an icon, but as such he is liked more by people outside the CZ than he is inside; For his corruption scandals, the fact he cheated on his terminally ill wife while she was still alive, and he put up a neon heart on the castle one day making it look like a cheap cathouse. And we do have people I value as defenders of freedom; Frantisek Fajtl, Wonka and others. Wonka actually died in severe prison; he wasn't pampered by the communists like Havel was.
@52111centrumcz Goddard may or may not have been inspired by Tsiolkovsky, but the fact remains that he was the first to work out the practical details of rocket propulsion and guidance, and the first to build working rockets. BTW, I believe Tsiolkovsky credited Jules Verne for inspiring his work! The Russians did not "build their rockets themselves". In 1945, Von Braun asked his team to choose which army they wanted to surrender to. Most chose the US, a few losers chose the USSR.
The Russians did build their first rockets themselves - if you look at the entire korolev team, there was one german in it. Nasa until 1960 was practically like a Nazi roster.
@52111centrumcz The Russians' early rockets were still based on the German V-2. The one area where the Russians have always been vastly superior to everyone else is espionage. Their vast spy network has brought them huge amounts of secret information on atomic weapons, rockets, and many other subjects. Of course, the fact that much technical information is published openly in the West has been of great help to them also.
Atomic weapons > sloika design, referred to as Teller Ulam design, was detonated one year after the first US test. You cannot build/understand such a concept that fast, and they developed their own.
Rockets > the USSR built RD-360 And RD-180 rocket engines in the 1980s. These engines are now being copied by Rocketdyne and Raytheon, since they could not untill recently (when they bought 30 of them) could not make a comparable engine.
@52111centrumcz Wow, what encyclopedia of misinformation have you been reading? Both Teller and Ullam were participants in the Manhattan project. The "first US test" was in July 1945. The Soviets didn't detonate their first atomic bomb until 1949. That's FOUR years, not one. It's a well-documented fact that the Manhattan project was riddled with Soviet spies and sympathizers who sent vast amounts of data to the Soviets.
obviously you do not know very much about nuclear tech. If you mean a fission weapon, than that is true. However, the Teller-Ulam design is a theoretical concept for a fusion weapon ignited by a fission bomb, in other words a Hydrogen bomb. Wiki might give you some clues. The Americans detonated one in 1952, the Russians built one in 1953 but didn't get it to work till 1955.
RD-360 are powerful turborocket engines that reheat oxygen before thrusting it into the main combustion chamber - they have some of the highest specific impulse and burn efficiencies of all rocket engines. Just put RD-180 or RD-360 into wikipedia.
Quoting from the RD-180 wiki:
NASA intends to produce a fully operational engine by 2020, or sooner if it can establish a partnership with the U.S. Defense Department.
ВЫ ничего(!) не знаете об истории... говорите какуюто лож!
Русским говорят о немецких разработках V-2 люди которые сами ничего не сделали - просто заставили работать немцев на себя. Какие пытки?! Вы про Гуантанама? Или США секретные тюрьмы в Европе?
Блять, сука, ненавижу гамбургерное образование вашей тупой, необразованной страны! Где хоть одно доказательство той ереси, глупости, лжи что ты здесь пишешь???!!!
@ViciousCritique The Russians have had their share of smart and talented people - the problem is that they tend to torture or kill them. A good example is Sergei Korolev, the driven genius who led the Soviet space program with great success until he died in 1966, due largely to the torture he had endured in prison camps years earlier. Between that and the stupidity of their communist system, the Soviets seemed to excel mostly at producing one disaster after another.
But they all do it, usa stole the most data design for supersonic from the british.
Who builds creates it. working creations combinated with the drafts are the important things of tech progress. And not the damned patent-wars going on, or law-companies that sit on all kinds off patenst for money and nothing gets made.
Ps: I Don't see the earnings connection at all btw.
@ferkeap Actually, the US didn't "steal supersonic design data from the British". The British worked hard at building a supersonic airplane in the late 1940's, but failed. Most early supersonic design data came from the Germans - and the US, Britain, the Soviets, and others benefited from it. As you know, the US was the first to achieve supersonic flight in 1947, after developing several key advances, such as the so-called "flying tail".
...He was a great,as well as the great was the Soviet People..But there was fuck... political war butween these rats of party , and state departments..We could be the first ,modern and really strong country..Could be with the help only one thing-the truly competition...without compromisses...Sorry,i dont speak in engl.
One thing I love about the USSR designers is that they think out side the box. they design very good beautiful planes. I love about 95% of those futuristic design. it is just because they do not have a lot of money to back up this design is the reason they behind and many of them do not make it pass the design concept stage.
@Trekkie1961 Look , a lot of them were developed in cold war , a moment where spying was on its top form so , it is normal that some aircrafts are identical. That doesnt mean that they are copy , just USA had the money to built it and built it first. Ahh btw , Americans still can't do the Pugachev.
Does anybody have more information about the design in 2:20?
Koshiro2k3 5 days ago
1:40 almost Thunderbird 2
PeterRosenqvist 1 week ago
these designs are awesome wow!!!
SuperMorphex 1 week ago
LOL!!!! When will the Russians come up with an original idea of their own, without having to steal it from the United States! More than half of his designs are knock off's of Amercian aircraft...the rest, just models that never even made it to the prototype stage. When will Russia build a car that can complete on the world maket? Oh! I guess you'll have to steal that too! LOL!!! Oh yes, the last plane in your video is a copy of the American B-58 Hustler! Rip Off!
speedracer392 1 week ago
2.17 is awesome.......
retrojaxed2 2 weeks ago
@cannrickyf14
Years before their research.
Pendimetaline 2 weeks ago
Copies of Osprey, XB-70, F-22 cabine Raptor, Concorde, B-1 concep and B-2, the others are true Rusian made
cannrickyf14 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cannrickyf14Copies of Osprey, XB-70, F-22 cabine Raptor, Concorde, B-1 concep and B-2 ..........................14 COPIES ???????????????? VLADIMIR MYASISHCHEV- (September 28, 1902–October 14, 1978) . XB-70 MYASISHCHEV was 62 years old. F-22 cabine Raptor 1990, B-2 1980 , Osprey 1980
Zbyszkoz 2 weeks ago
@cannrickyf14 The Osprey was NOT the first tiltrotor and that concept looks nothing like the Osprey anyway. Vague visual similarities do not mean "copies". I think you will find that when you compare aircraft intended for similar roles many similarities crop up, regardless of where they are from (I wonder why...).
joeceph 2 weeks ago
@cannrickyf14 Jesus l, This project was on Draw board long before , B1, B2, F22 was just idea. Concorde has parallel time envelop whit Russian version, Just Ospray, and some part of black bird is involved in drawings.But that is same thing like US of A people love to say, "PAKFA is copy of F22".
runxxeroxx 1 week ago
@runxxeroxx yeah, but maybe u.s has more advenced secret bombers?
xxxDarkProjectsxxx 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@alexandr3384 Ваша Cтрана никогда не умирает! nspap livejournal com/13726 html
DOCTORNO2012 3 weeks ago
He passed ahead of times with his concepts, just some of them were realised.
MrJatsok 3 weeks ago
Talented man!
R.I.P.
MrJatsok 3 weeks ago
@MrJatsok what was he builder of black projects(unknown projects) or what?
xxxDarkProjectsxxx 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Looks like he designed a lot of cool planes but the USSR didn't have the money or technology to fund or build them. Too bad the Soviets decided to be assholes after WWII.. It didn't get them anywhere.
coldfarted 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
coldfarted 4 weeks ago
the b-3 will look crazy,manny times cooler than b-2!!!!
xxxDarkProjectsxxx 1 month ago
Now our party has something better. Dr. Adolf Nowak nspap livejournal com
DOCTORNO2012 1 month ago
he withou any doubt, was a true genius!
darkestlost 1 month ago
Начнем с того, что все эти конструкции создавались на деньги централизовано отбираемые у граждан СССР. это было. Мое детство тоже прошло в СССР. В США, и на Луну отправили несколько экспедиций, и люди жили в 10 и более раз лучше чем в СССР. В СССР -и люди жили хуже соответственно в 10 раз, что в СССР "прохлопали " сами считайте.
MrDimatec 1 month ago
@MrDimatec
Твои хваленные пендоссы никогда не были на луне. Bill Kaysing - "we never went to the moon"
Прочти потом мели языком!
Russia2010 3 weeks ago
Copycats?
Dominikmj 1 month ago
@Dominikmj americans ?
sad4ewer 1 month ago
@sad4ewer
Lets say Buran, the UAV, PAK FA T50, T-160 and so on... are clearly Western inspired.
They are not copies... but well - at least inspired.
Dominikmj 1 month ago
What is that thing at 1:12
HijadelAltisimo77 1 month ago
and white knight + spaceship1 protos at 1:16 omfg
karaneychev 1 month ago
b2 proto at 0:50 lol
karaneychev 1 month ago
Nice models. I think I spotted a B-57, B-70 Valkyrie and a B-2 in there. It's unfortunate that Vladimir was never given the opportunity to build many of his designs. It seem the is the USSR as in the US, chemical rockets had a hold on space launches,
NRay1660 1 month ago
you are a bad designer
bothmane1979 1 month ago
he seems to have a lot of designs based on the delta shaped 'aerodynamic lifting body' concept...nice though.
kz11377 1 month ago
'
i like american B-1 / B-2 / B-52 / SR-71 are the best airplanes than ussr russia
bestamerica 1 month ago
@bestamerica It's just your opinion>
888explorer 1 month ago
he stole this from johnny quest, the prick
kevin73133 1 month ago
why paying tribute to the russian scum ,who only steals patents?the russians should stick to drinking bc its the only thing they are good at-and realize once and for all ,that they dont belong in the creativity class-sorry.
UHaveTeaUHaveLife 1 month ago
@UHaveTeaUHaveLife
1st in Space, 1st space station...no creativity? Have you even heard of Tchaikovsky? Although it is true the USSR did reverse engineer a lot of things, the Russian people are as creative as any other.
marmaladekamikaze 1 month ago
Comment removed
B1sher 1 month ago
Comment removed
B1sher 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@UHaveTeaUHaveLife Russians created: -Radio -First bicycle 1801 -Electric welding -Digital Technology was coined in Russia how and first PC in 1968 -Electric motor and First Electric car in 1899 -TV set in 1907 -Modern type of parachute -Nuclear Power Plants -Table of chemical elements -Laser -H-bomb -First machine gun in 1913 -Incandescent -diving apparatus in 1871 -Cable telegraph line -The optical sight -Electric welding And sooooo many others what do you use NOW.JUST LIMIT WORDS IN MESSAGE
B1sher 1 month ago
Yeah, like the US never stole patents... Read the story of Thomas Edison and other famous "inventors" and come back with your tail between your legs, dumbass.
rtdnlcastro 1 month ago
@joannawie. Quit watching Fox News. You have not a slightest idea what USSR was.
lapa0121 1 month ago
he was a pirate?
killytbe6 1 month ago 36
@killytbe6 no, he was inventor.
AdlerMalthus 4 days ago
@TheNoob978, what you are writing about? What a piece of propagandist' crap? USSR was like mom and dad to the people? Did you came from another planet? Have you heard of GULAG where milions have died, have you heard of Byelomorkanal? Or you live in some soviet fairy tale paradise series illustrated in Komsomolskaya Pravda? Genocide country - that was the soviet "papa-i-mama". Horrible lie!
joannawie 1 month ago
Sorry, that - above - was to "alexandr3384" not to "TheNoob978".
joannawie 1 month ago
@joannawie "Have you heard of GULAG where milions have died"
It`s bullshit. Yankees stupid propagand. ГУЛАГ (Главное Упарвление Лагерями actualy). It`s not one place. It`s sompthing like United States Department of Justice Criminal Division. It was system of prison and prison security. Nothing else.
Anteus007 1 month ago
Always the same problem. Great constructors (like in space industry) and real tragedy in production. What a pity.
joannawie 1 month ago
were's the kirov =(
Reuged 1 month ago
These designs are amazing and beautiful beyond description.
vmj361 1 month ago
From the time when Russia actually made the coolest stuff.
CognosSquare 2 months ago
Russian inferior garbage ...i flaged this video as spam ..because all the crap in this video is not good enough against USA .
Keep it up russian losers one day maybe u will reach the lowest standard of the USA superiority.
ViciousCritique 2 months ago
@ViciousCritique obvious troll is obvious, go to back celebrating new year, better yet, grab some books and read them- u will need it to get to college, or else you will spend your entire life working at Hardee's. U mad jelly fag?
Vitalik1Ru 2 months ago
@ViciousCritique wow... just wow.. You sir/mam are a full blown retard. Try talking to the rest of the community and I when you have reached the standard of a normal, non- retarded person.
sniperdft 1 month ago
@ViciousCritique LMFAO, you are either a 12 year old or a paranoid 50 year old that still has a bomb shelter in the backyard... idiot.
Hatinonthehaters 1 month ago 2
@Hatinonthehaters Fuck off russian loser....u are no match against our military .
We could beat u within one week.
ViciousCritique 1 month ago
@ViciousCritique Im American, you uneducated twat. You dont have the slightest Idea what you are talking about... Go back to playing video games.
Hatinonthehaters 1 month ago
@Hatinonthehaters Because u got your american citizenship yesterday doesnt mean you are american ....so fuck off russian punk.
ViciousCritique 1 month ago
@ViciousCritique Only native indians are real americans ,you,stupid asshole!
888explorer 1 month ago
@888explorer Why are Indians the only "real Americans"? They came here from other parts of the world, too.
amateurphilosopher 1 month ago
@amateurphilosopher Yeah..they come from India actually :))
aerofilll 1 month ago
@ViciousCritique may I ask.. Are you 14? or just so dumb? look at this video..there are not many American plane that looks like what you see in it.. And the Americans have nothing similar to Antonov An-225 for example..
Sorry to brake it to you kid.. there is actually nothing interesting or great about your precious country that others have´t done to..
EBGlobal72 1 month ago
@EBGlobal72 Fuck off u little inferior russian .
ViciousCritique 1 month ago
@ViciousCritique Hahaha by that comment you proved it that you'r an idiot hehe
EBGlobal72 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@EBGlobal72 And you are subhuman , simple as that.
ViciousCritique 1 month ago
@ViciousCritique But nuclear warheads do,all your elite army will not stand it,that is for sure!
888explorer 1 month ago
@ViciousCritique you are complete Idiot..
EBGlobal72 1 month ago
@ViciousCritique Perhabs that day USA will not exist anymore,evil bastards can't exist forever.
888explorer 1 month ago
@888explorer Your profile says that you are in Latvia. Since Latvia was one of the countries that was occupied by the Soviets, I have to assume from your attitude that you are not a real Latvian, but one of the criminal Soviet occupiers who didn't want to go home to your uncivilized dump of a country when Latvia became free.
amateurphilosopher 1 month ago
WHAT'S THE NAME OF THE JET AT 2:23 ?
ciak1 2 months ago
@ciak1 on 2:23? it's the SSR-71 (Stolen Soviet Ripoff or Steamrollered SR-71).
UHaveTeaUHaveLife 1 month ago
если был так плох СССР то почему так много было достижений....мы были на равных с США...а теперь мы страна третьего мира с остатками ядерного оружия и технологий СССР
a7a7a7a100 2 months ago
@a7a7a7a100 The USSR might have been on par with the US in terms of military capability and academics, but in every other respect it was always a third world country. If Russia can ever establish true democracy, it will hopefully join the "first world".
amateurphilosopher 2 months ago
@amateurphilosopher вам дает хорошо жить не демократия а мировой капитал который живет на территории США.и который вы охраняете...если завтра капитал скажет мы улучшим вам жизнь в 2раза всем жителям США но вы молитесь на нас как на богов вы согласитесь и будете называть не демократия а БОГИ...
a7a7a7a100 2 months ago
@amateurphilosopher What is true democracy? USA has more prisoners than any country in the world! What about democrcy for indians?
888explorer 1 month ago
@888explorer Perhaps the USA has more prisoners than any other country in the world because we are better at catching criminals. In some countries, most of the criminals end up in the government. Democracy for Indians? Here in the US, Indians have as much right to vote as anyone else.
amateurphilosopher 1 month ago
Comment removed
aerofilll 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@amateurphilosopher Wow..some great rights they have..to VOTE :))..they are so lucky then, sounds like Orwell 1984 Do you know what kind of classes of people and what ethnicity`s and colors are 95% in USA jails !? Poor, Black people, Indians, Latinos. Some criminals you have :) people who got nothing to do and nothing to lose, and got no money for College.In some countries criminals are in government but in some countries they have killers of 3-rd worlds people.
aerofilll 1 month ago
@a7a7a7a100 Никогда мы не были на равных с США. В смысле военных технологий-да, а в остальном мы всегда отставали.
alexandr3384 2 months ago
@alexandr3384 Прошу примеры, доказательства, источники.
Если ты не знаешь истории своей страны, это вовсе не значит что её небыло.
OPworldwideIA 2 months ago
@OPworldwideIA США самая экономически развитая страна в мире уже больше 150 лет. У них инжинеры живут в особняках, где у каждого члена семьи есть своя машина. Вспомни , как мы жили. Калашников (изобрёл АК-47)жил в полусгнившей двушке, которому Американцы предлагали особняк и машину с водителем. У нас ничего не было кроме армии. Мы все были нищими.Страна тонула в очередях и дифиците.Я знаю историю своей Страны. Я жил в СССР. Всё помню. Страна была сильная, но люди были нищие.
alexandr3384 2 months ago
@alexandr3384 Люди были нищие? да, они были, но не так много как сей час. десятки миллионов в России живут за чертой бедности.
TheNoob978 1 month ago
@TheNoob978 Государство было для народа,как мама и папа.Всё было бесплатно, работать чуть-ли не силой заставляли. После развала люди оказались беспомощными, сидят дома и сами себя жалеют, Советский Союз вспоминают. Жалко вас, тяжело вам в жизни придётся.
alexandr3384 1 month ago
@alexandr3384 Shame on you!! Your country will never come out of alcoholic coma if you still choose to live in such an illusion.
joannawie 1 month ago
@joannawie А нахер ты пишишь на английском, если знаешь русский ???
Anteus007 1 month ago
@TheNoob978 Многие вспоминают СССР хорошим словом и я в том числе, потому-что там прошло моё детство, но вряд-ли кто-нибудь согласился бы прожить свою жизнь сначала в Советском Союзе.Россия не идеальная Страна,но это наша Родина. Если мы все только скулить будем,то наша Родина ещё 30 лет в жопе будет.
alexandr3384 1 month ago 25
@alexandr3384 There is a message for you, above, alexandr3384. Shame on you !!!!
joannawie 1 month ago
@alexandr3384 И все что ты говоришь это Горбачевщина в 80-е годы.Очереди и дефицит это побочный эффект перестройки. То что говоришь про ученых, мягко говоря неправда. В СССР ученые, учителя, рабочие были привилегированным классом, им платили большие деньги (по крайней мере до Горбачева). если так нравится США, никто тебя не держит.
TheNoob978 1 month ago
@TheNoob978 Ты помнишь, что было ,когда поднялся железный занавес? Для нас весь мир был как другая планета.Одежда, машины, видеомагнитафоны, даже еда, всё было в новинку.Жили под замком, как катаржане.Не говори мне, что у нас всё было.Привилегии по тем временам-это квартира без очереди,или гос.машина с водителем.Если у тебя ностальгия, езжай в Северную Корею-СССР в миниатюре.
alexandr3384 1 month ago
@alexandr3384 А как они стали богатыми наживаясь на войне других стран.Если бы они черпнули хоть десятую часть тех войн,что вела Россия обороняясь он вторжений ,то они бы захлебнулись.Это уж точно.
888explorer 1 month ago
@OPworldwideIA Мы тратили миллиарды на вооружение, а у самих не было ни комбайнов, ни тракторов.Зато тюрем и лагерей было больше чем в любой другой стране.
alexandr3384 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what is the name of the aircraft in 2:18 please reply because it is awesome.
aker1993 2 months ago
I remember all of these...except for the white one.
MavHunter20XX 2 months ago
whats that green one at 1:37???
Jasonbjamin 2 months ago
@Jasonbjamin Plane transformer in a helicopter similar to MI 30. only with four engines.))
redneck10ivan 2 months ago
@HighAltitudeAttitude Moreover. The speech presented here by this primitive boor is a clean representation of traditional american slogan: "if you are so clever, why you are so poor". This belief makes average american an especially loyal servants of any rich man: they really think that their poverty is the result of their natural stupidity. And in some point of view it is true, because of only idiots could swallow such a nonsense.
perlghost 2 months ago
@HighAltitudeAttitude I thought you would better not thought at all. It is not your profile. Take another hamburger and keep silence until the state debt made by "the american innovative contributors" hasn't yet overestimated the number of atoms in the universe. To live at another's expense is not such a new trick as you think, cowboy.
perlghost 2 months ago
Right I know this is off subject and too peaceful for some on here..but whats the aircraft at 2.20?
MrMajidaxel 2 months ago
Every nation has talented and innovative designers. It's just too bad that some of them have to work for murderous, inhumane regimes.
amateurphilosopher 2 months ago
@amateurphilosopher
I bet you're one of those Americans who thinks USA is doing nothing wrong with their toys of destruction :)
spacemanvw 2 months ago
@spacemanvw Only a fool would say that the USA, with hundreds of far-flung bases all over the world, never does anything wrong. (Especially with a crazed African communist as "commander-in-chief"). The US mlitary only does what it's told to do by politicians, who are not known for their wisdom. In spite of that, the US has used its "toys" to do a lot of good, such as saving Europe in 3 wars, trying to save SE asia from communism, liberating a billion people by defeating the Soviets, etc.
amateurphilosopher 2 months ago
@amateurphilosopher Oh, gosh. "USA saved Europe in 3 wars"?
In WW1 USA saved not Europe itself, but some (not all) Antanta countries.
In WW2 USA really "saved" western Europe from Soviet influence, you are right.
But what is third war? Cold war? US army defeated SU army in cold war? Good grass.
Of course, you could believe that "USA saved Europe from communism". It is a big question, did Europe need to be saved, but let it be. You could believe even in flying pasta monster.
perlghost 2 months ago
@perlghost In WW1 the US couldn't save ALL of Europe, because part of Europe was the aggressor (The Central powers). The US saved Europe by helping defeat the Central powers.
In WW2 the US didn't save Europe from Soviet influence - it was the Marshall Plan AFTER WW2 that did that.
The "third war" (sorry I had to be brief because of the 500 character limit) was indeed the Cold war. Former Soviet generals have since admitted that it was Pres. Reagan's SDI that led to the end of the cold war.
amateurphilosopher 2 months ago
It is interesting to consider how many genial plane constructors Russia had!
indebtedtotheking 2 months ago
@HighAltitudeAttitude
I think you have a incorrect view of the reality. Chinese also invent and keep getting better @ it. There are more new engineers in china each year then anywhere else.
Your maybe from the USA, almost all american rockets engines are derived from the RD-180 russian invented rocket engine.
ferkeap 2 months ago
@ferkeap American rocket engines are NOT based on the RD-180. NASA is currently importing this engine for use on its Atlas rocket, because it is more efficient than conventional engines (at the cost of greater complexity). The US knows how to design rocket engines. The F-1 engine that powered the Saturn V moon rocket is still the most powerful engine ever built - and it's more than 40 years old!
amateurphilosopher 2 months ago
@amateurphilosopher
Thank you for letting everybody know what a dumbass you are! The most powerful engine ever built is the Russian RD-170. Get you facts straight. The reason NASA uses RD-180 is because it replaces three engines in Atlas with just one RD-180. Do the math.
larry81076 2 months ago
@larry81076 Comparing the RD-170 to the F-1 is misleading. According to wikipedia, some people consider the RD-170 to be a cluster of 4 engines, rather than a single engine. The reason the RD-170 uses 4 combustion chambers is because the russians never could figure out how to maintain stable combustion in a single large engine - something NASA figured out back in 1961! In spite of all that, the RD-170 still just barely manages to beat the F-1 - 1.697 million lbs. thrust vs 1.522 for the F-1.
amateurphilosopher 2 months ago
@amateurphilosopher
"Really misleading" according to whom , you? You can put four mufflers on your car but you will still have only one engine. 1 set of turbines and pumps, i think it's pretty clear that it's a single engine. I know the author of the wikipedia article wanted to make US look good, but sometimes you got to use your head a little. Also 1.697 > 1.522 , no reason to deny that RD-170 is more powerful.
larry81076 2 months ago
@larry81076
Actually cylinders of an engine would have been a more appropriate comparison instead of the mufflers.
larry81076 2 months ago
@larry81076 Not really. The reason most piston engines have multiple cylinders is for smoother running and minimizing the mass of the flywheel. These reasons do not apply to rocket engines. Using several combustion chambers in a rocket instead of one big one of equivalent power reduces thermal efficiency and adds weight because more material is required.
amateurphilosopher 2 months ago
@amateurphilosopher
Dude , you are a fucking idiot. Did you even go to high school?
larry81076 2 months ago
@larry81076 Now THATS's an intelligent reply. Suspicion confirmed.
amateurphilosopher 2 months ago
@larry81076 I'm afraid Wikipedia may feel insulted by your assertion that they are pro-American. That is not their reputation. Anyway, the combustion chamber of a liquid-fueled rocket engine has always been the most difficult part to design. The fact that you have to cluster four small ones to meet your requirements indicates that you are not capable of designing one big one, which would be the more efficient design.
amateurphilosopher 2 months ago
@amateurphilosopher
You started with a false statement about the most powerful rocket engine, then you veered off into discussion about engines, and now you are claiming that a combustion chamber is the most difficult part of design. Is it so hard to admit that you have made a false statement? If you have ever written a research paper then you should know the reason why wikipedia should never be in your cited sources. (also, in the article about F1, "some people" should have been a red flag).
larry81076 2 months ago
@larry81076
p.s. it's about time to know that wikipedia articles are not written by wikipedia owners.
larry81076 2 months ago
@larry81076 Did I not say that the RD-170 beat out the F-1 in terms of thrust? I even gave you the numbers!
amateurphilosopher 2 months ago
@amateurphilosopher
If you want to look at the marvel of engineering of 1970s that your country can't repeat even now check out the NK-33 (the highest thrust-to-weight ratio of any Earth-launchable rocket engine). Also where did you get that the Russians could never figure out how to maintain stable combustion in a single large engine? NK-33 is not small at all.
larry81076 2 months ago
@larry81076 The NK-33 is such a "marvel of engineering" that it has spent most of its life stored in warehouses, and has never actually been used on a real spaceflight. I wonder why - perhaps it conjures up memories of its predecessor - the NK-15 - which was the cause of of four consecutive disasters in the USSR's four attempts to launch their N-1 moon rocket. The NK-33 may not be "small", but at only 338,000 lbs. thrust, it's certainly not in the same class as the biggest engines.
amateurphilosopher 2 months ago
@amateurphilosopher NASA, or the Germans working for NASA?
SapperK9 2 months ago
@SapperK9 It's no secret that the Germans made major contributions to the US space program (also the USSR's). As I once heard someone boast, "OUR German scientists are better than THEIR German scientists!" But seriously, the US had plenty of home-grown talent in the aerospace business. Don't forget that Robert Goddard was the first to build a practical liquid-fueled rocket, and Wherner Von Braun has credited Goddard with teaching him a lot about rocketry in the 1930's.
amateurphilosopher 2 months ago
@amateurphilosopher Russians are inferior ....without german scientists and stealing stuff from the US they would be still in the stone age.
ViciousCritique 2 months ago
@ViciousCritique
And the US without being given stuff by the British and stealing German rocket scientists in Operation Paperclip would still be using steam traction. Unlike the Russkies which built their rockets themselves. Oh and Goddard (the US rocket scientists in the 1930s) was inspired by - Konstantin Tsiolkovsky.
52111centrumcz 2 months ago
@52111centrumcz What a nonsense communist bullshit you are spewing ....russian scientists were always inferior if u compare them with german , british or US ones.
Arent u a Czech ?? I saw over yahoo news Vaclav Havel died ....last defender of freedom for the czechs .
ViciousCritique 2 months ago
@ViciousCritique
Look up who Konstantin Tsiolkovksy was. He wasn't a communist, he in fact died before the Soviet Union was formed. And don't bash Russians, just because they're Russian. I don't like their government, but I give credit where its due; You don't mind using the Mendelev table of the elements as a scientific tool and reject it just because it was put together as a concept by a Russian do you? Such hatred is stupid and non-sensical.
52111centrumcz 2 months ago
@ViciousCritique
Oh and Havel; he was an icon, but as such he is liked more by people outside the CZ than he is inside; For his corruption scandals, the fact he cheated on his terminally ill wife while she was still alive, and he put up a neon heart on the castle one day making it look like a cheap cathouse. And we do have people I value as defenders of freedom; Frantisek Fajtl, Wonka and others. Wonka actually died in severe prison; he wasn't pampered by the communists like Havel was.
52111centrumcz 2 months ago
@52111centrumcz Goddard may or may not have been inspired by Tsiolkovsky, but the fact remains that he was the first to work out the practical details of rocket propulsion and guidance, and the first to build working rockets. BTW, I believe Tsiolkovsky credited Jules Verne for inspiring his work! The Russians did not "build their rockets themselves". In 1945, Von Braun asked his team to choose which army they wanted to surrender to. Most chose the US, a few losers chose the USSR.
amateurphilosopher 2 months ago
@amateurphilosopher
The Russians did build their first rockets themselves - if you look at the entire korolev team, there was one german in it. Nasa until 1960 was practically like a Nazi roster.
52111centrumcz 2 months ago
@52111centrumcz The Russians' early rockets were still based on the German V-2. The one area where the Russians have always been vastly superior to everyone else is espionage. Their vast spy network has brought them huge amounts of secret information on atomic weapons, rockets, and many other subjects. Of course, the fact that much technical information is published openly in the West has been of great help to them also.
amateurphilosopher 2 months ago
@amateurphilosopher
Atomic weapons > sloika design, referred to as Teller Ulam design, was detonated one year after the first US test. You cannot build/understand such a concept that fast, and they developed their own.
Rockets > the USSR built RD-360 And RD-180 rocket engines in the 1980s. These engines are now being copied by Rocketdyne and Raytheon, since they could not untill recently (when they bought 30 of them) could not make a comparable engine.
So cut the propaganda, its tiresome.
52111centrumcz 2 months ago
@52111centrumcz Wow, what encyclopedia of misinformation have you been reading? Both Teller and Ullam were participants in the Manhattan project. The "first US test" was in July 1945. The Soviets didn't detonate their first atomic bomb until 1949. That's FOUR years, not one. It's a well-documented fact that the Manhattan project was riddled with Soviet spies and sympathizers who sent vast amounts of data to the Soviets.
amateurphilosopher 2 months ago
@amateurphilosopher
obviously you do not know very much about nuclear tech. If you mean a fission weapon, than that is true. However, the Teller-Ulam design is a theoretical concept for a fusion weapon ignited by a fission bomb, in other words a Hydrogen bomb. Wiki might give you some clues. The Americans detonated one in 1952, the Russians built one in 1953 but didn't get it to work till 1955.
52111centrumcz 2 months ago
@52111centrumcz No, I'm not an expert on nukes. I thought you were referring to the original A-bomb tests.
By the way, what's a RD-360? I haven't heard of it, and google is no help.
amateurphilosopher 2 months ago
@amateurphilosopher
RD-360 are powerful turborocket engines that reheat oxygen before thrusting it into the main combustion chamber - they have some of the highest specific impulse and burn efficiencies of all rocket engines. Just put RD-180 or RD-360 into wikipedia.
Quoting from the RD-180 wiki:
NASA intends to produce a fully operational engine by 2020, or sooner if it can establish a partnership with the U.S. Defense Department.
52111centrumcz 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@amateurphilosopher
Кто ж вам так мозг изнасиловал, парни??!!
ВЫ ничего(!) не знаете об истории... говорите какуюто лож!
Русским говорят о немецких разработках V-2 люди которые сами ничего не сделали - просто заставили работать немцев на себя. Какие пытки?! Вы про Гуантанама? Или США секретные тюрьмы в Европе?
RussBETEP 2 months ago
@52111centrumcz
Королев - русский!!! Родился, жил, работал и умер в России. Мама его - русская, папа - русский.
Не будьте глупцами! - учитсь в школе!
RussBETEP 2 months ago
@RussBETEP
negavarim parusky - napis po anglicky, spasiba.
52111centrumcz 2 months ago
@RussBETEP Who said that Korolev was not Russian? I used him as an example of a Russian genius.
amateurphilosopher 2 months ago
@amateurphilosopher
Блять, сука, ненавижу гамбургерное образование вашей тупой, необразованной страны! Где хоть одно доказательство той ереси, глупости, лжи что ты здесь пишешь???!!!
RussBETEP 2 months ago
@RussBETEP I think that whatever translator you are using has distorted my statements into something I did not say.
amateurphilosopher 2 months ago
@ViciousCritique The Russians have had their share of smart and talented people - the problem is that they tend to torture or kill them. A good example is Sergei Korolev, the driven genius who led the Soviet space program with great success until he died in 1966, due largely to the torture he had endured in prison camps years earlier. Between that and the stupidity of their communist system, the Soviets seemed to excel mostly at producing one disaster after another.
amateurphilosopher 2 months ago
@HighAltitudeAttitude ? if thats true than 99% if americans are idiots .... oh wait, that's true
osloboez 2 months ago
@HighAltitudeAttitude
ask yourself who steels from who.
We don't know it all.
But they all do it, usa stole the most data design for supersonic from the british.
Who builds creates it. working creations combinated with the drafts are the important things of tech progress. And not the damned patent-wars going on, or law-companies that sit on all kinds off patenst for money and nothing gets made.
Ps: I Don't see the earnings connection at all btw.
ferkeap 2 months ago
@ferkeap Actually, the US didn't "steal supersonic design data from the British". The British worked hard at building a supersonic airplane in the late 1940's, but failed. Most early supersonic design data came from the Germans - and the US, Britain, the Soviets, and others benefited from it. As you know, the US was the first to achieve supersonic flight in 1947, after developing several key advances, such as the so-called "flying tail".
amateurphilosopher 2 months ago
A copy of a B-2 on an ashtray ?
superwout 3 months ago
nice toys
zajac88 3 months ago
1:19 this is so bad ass!! great designs!
blackmetalwarrior 3 months ago
Bold and visionary Designs!
nethead4223 3 months ago
@nethead4223
they worked.
LoneRussianS 3 months ago
Never thought the Pirates theme could pass for Russian until now
littleroot2 3 months ago
@littleroot2
He didn't know - they did have ricerine pirated only. UKraine - small seagoing, greenwater.
LoneRussianS 3 months ago
Comment removed
littleroot2 3 months ago
this music makes me feel like a true champion!
shalimar7100 3 months ago
@shalimar7100 it is pirate music
cyberspy79 3 months ago
@cyberspy79
never mind - it is not appropriate.
LoneRussianS 3 months ago
Dlja nikolas333...ogromnoe spasibo za pamjat i primer segodnjshnej rossijskoj ...elite,net ni partii ni strany ..ni naroda-odna elita
rollerport 3 months ago
@rollerport
What kind of saloon elite? almost all of the are silly chainy bastards.
LoneRussianS 3 months ago
...He was a great,as well as the great was the Soviet People..But there was fuck... political war butween these rats of party , and state departments..We could be the first ,modern and really strong country..Could be with the help only one thing-the truly competition...without compromisses...Sorry,i dont speak in engl.
rollerport 3 months ago
He is no longer in favor with Comrade Stalin. Playing Johny Depp music won't help him...
monsterzeroJr 3 months ago
@monsterzeroJr
That music has no consern making those jets operational...
Found of that homsexual pirate?
LoneRussianS 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All of that. And even more. Are You about occupation?
LoneRussianS 3 months ago
I want those awesome ashtrays! (0:52) & (1:00). And I don't even smoke.
DaddyOD13 3 months ago
failure
razag911 4 months ago
thanks for the upload...VLADIMIR MYASISHCHEV
t1000eg 4 months ago
One thing I love about the USSR designers is that they think out side the box. they design very good beautiful planes. I love about 95% of those futuristic design. it is just because they do not have a lot of money to back up this design is the reason they behind and many of them do not make it pass the design concept stage.
superlight47 4 months ago
A lot of those designs are copies of American aircraft.
Trekkie1961 4 months ago
@Trekkie1961 Look , a lot of them were developed in cold war , a moment where spying was on its top form so , it is normal that some aircrafts are identical. That doesnt mean that they are copy , just USA had the money to built it and built it first. Ahh btw , Americans still can't do the Pugachev.
jorgecosta95 4 months ago