Part 28/39 A Conversation with Andrew D Basiago

[manonfireb4u]

i found the picture!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! wow

[Djelomou]

Can't see anything on this Gettysburgh picture...not that I expected to see anything :)

[daxas02]

in french, we say Grippe for flue

[Ghis1964c]

yeah lol, and flue in french is not at all something we can even say here;)

salut

Ghis

[garysingh101]

This is making a movie and the science is accurate, I have past life memories of being a scientist on mars, well before this interview, so how is that explained...?

What questions are being avoided, you can post these questions to me and I will see that they are answered via Jessica....

The way things are looking, it's sensible to believe that anything truley is possible.

I have asked some serious questions about quantum access and chronovision. Henry Deacon is another whistleblower...

[captainarchernx01]

I hope to find out more about both the interviewer and the interviewee. True or false, listening to this is entertaining and compelling. This would make one hell of a movie. Many elements of this narrative have been used recently in a similar way in the Fox TV show Fringe.

[FaFaFury]

hollywood takes from reality it's usually not the other way around as we are lead to so often believe.

[Criptografo]

sorry but this is bullshit

[garysingh101]

I very much doubt it, watch my videos freind...there's a big game going on and we are all part of it, but don't dwell on subject that don't interest you.

There is soo much science, that is accurate in this, this guy is not an oscar winner, this is real, there are references and verifications to other things that have been found by other people.

Peace

[Aztar99]

it was a no think, knee jerk comment.

No need to even try to explain to him.

[Slanguaj]

soo much accurate science?? what r u talking about? Both him and the interviewer are avoiding very important questions. questions that an ameateur theologist, or even fans of back to the future would immediately ask any apparent time traveler. I warn you all, don't let these sharletans fill your head with these ideas and concepts that sound great, but do INTENSE psychological and intellectual harm.

[blisssis]

As opposed to the intense psychological and intellectual benefit that you gained watching Back to the Future ? Come on, more damage is inflicted by TV crime with all those bashings and rapes in full colour at dinner time. You are full of fear and have a closed mind friend. You can google the science if you really want to. PS This has nothing to do with theology and an open mind is NEVER dangerous, but closed minds(like fundamental theologians who can't spell amateur or charlatan)breed ignorance.

[Slanguaj]

I have a closed mind? you don't even know me, I've spoken with countless abductees, healers and mediums. My whole life has been consumed by the search for unbiased truth... and I know the difference between people in search of truth and those that just want to feel high and mighty as they sit in their esoteric circles mocking the 'ignorant' masses. But even they aren't as bad as the people who mix truths with pseudo-scientific gibberish and sell it to people who feel an emptiness in their life.

[Djelomou]

Yeah the good thing is that he is talking a lot and too much for his theories to hold (IMO). Like talking about Jesus...I recently saw Zeitgeist the movie and how Jesus is in fact a representation of the Sun. Amazing movie by the way.

So saying we saw Jesus getting crucified proves what he says is false (IMO I don;t want to launch a religious debate here).

However if he is lying he is doing it quite well.