Added: 6 years ago
From: freetruth101
Views: 117,134
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (581)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @cottoniiijoe: yea i can see clearly where a big ass building fell on top of it dumb ass.

  • it collapsed not because a plane hit it, but because a fucking another building fell on top of it,

    building 7 was leaning like the tower of pisa, thats why the fireman got the fuck out of there,

    whats with the bullshit vid stating " they did not know what brought the building down" are fucking serious, as for explosives, watch a vid with "AUDIO" of building brought down by cd,

    half of fucking ny would have heard the explosions, no audio proof yet, as for concrete used in the wtc's? wtf,

  • God, this video is such self-evident horseshit. How can anyone fall for it? You have to be uneducated and a frothing government hater to even begin to believe this conspiracy silliness.

    No, I'm not in denial. I'm in fits of laughter.

  • great mystery...

  • Whoever made this video is hilarious. Statements like "It is scientific fact and can not disagree with it"  that is the most preposterous statement since 99.9% of all scientist agree that global warming is man made. He uses words like science and fact but then makes these dogmatic statements like "You can not disagree" and there only one explanation and if you disagree it must be because you are in denial. What an idiot.

  • Shit video thoroughly debunked bullshit

  • The collapse of WTC7 was BETTER than most controlled demolitions. The east and west upper corners of the north facade dropped within a half second of each other, though the building was 100 meters wide. Pretty good timing for chaotic fires but easy for a CD. WTC7, at least the part we can see in the videos, dropped at free fall ACCELERATION (not speed) for 2.25 seconds, according to NIST. Therefore, some "event" suddenly removed 25 meters of vertical support from all over the base.

  • So let me get this straight....when the leaseholder of an office building orders the fire department to blow up a building they have to do it? Is that what we are supposed to believe now? I never knew " lease holders " had that much power.

  • Are you suggesting that the fire department and Larry Silverstein were "in on it?" I think they would both find that extremely offensive. What Larry Silverstein said was "pull it." That phrase is not used in the demolition industry to refer to destroying a building with explosives. What he meant was that the fire department decided to "pull" all the firefighters out of the building.

  • All the accounts of “explosions” come from eyewitness testimonies from a few people who were very panicked, scared, and confused at the time. If there were explosions intended to demolish the building, there would have been very loud bangs heard from miles around and clearly recorded on all cameras present. Look at videos of buildings being demolished with explosives, and you'll see just how much noise they make. Building 7 had no sounds of explosions at all.

  • Flt93 was supposed to hit bldg7 to give similar plausability as to bldgs 1&2. Why were we told it was gonna fly all the way to DC when it was alreadny known planes were crashing? Exactly who make that determination? How did several diff news sources prematurely announce bldg7 collapsed when it didn't? Somebody was behind schedule, stuck in Pa. No way would they attempt to fly much further to DC, they were intending to go to NYC much closer and fly into the next highest tower, bldg7.

  • @morttodd no it wasn't

  • @jplindgren1956

    Yes it was. Now fk off. Neener neener neener you got a real small one mr weener, That's why your one of those shmegeggie disinfo sock puppets,

  • @morttodd no it wasn't

  • Who cares , if the government set it all up just to blame muslims . Muslims are dirty evil people , they need to be blamed .

  • @sigmunds1 You are a very ignorant person...

  • @12HOURSss .........You don't agree ? Who got blamed for 9/11 ? actually it's gog and magog. Yesss religion mixed with world politics .

  • The aim of all the disinformation forcedly circulated is to destroy the US society. Its done by snitchers spreading lies and hatred. The reason is to impede the US superpower which had been, in the eyes of the world, a shining example of freedom, justice and democracy. The US did not change in respect to freedom, justice and democracy but nevertheless these constant attacks have destroyed the reputation of the US. My brother Markus Bott had been tortured and was murdered because of our homepage.

  • Collapse of WTC building 7: were explosives used?

    Yes.

  • Could someone explain to me the process in which WTC 1, 2 and 7 were demolished. I'm having trouble wrapping my head around the demo theory. It seems like you say the towers came down in a top-down series of explosions beginning at the point of impact - really hard for me to understand. Also, I've never heard charge explosives in WTC7 videos despite the existence of video recorded from nearby

  • The government couldn't cover up a blow job.

  • fuck the goverment, there i said it... Now stop lying to me and tell me how 18 seconds is under 10 seconds since the seismic evidence tells us that wtc 7 fell in about 18 seconds. wtc 1 and 2 fell in more than the 9.2 seconds a freefall object would have fallen... Plz stop lying to me and tell me the truth... At this point the goverment and the truthers have lied to me about an equal amount

  • This is NOT seismic evidence. It is VIDEO from several different angles. go to AE 911Truth dot org to see the actual measurements in scale. All of these camera angles don't lie. WTC 7 fell at free fall speed for a good amount of the time it took for total collapse. That defies the physics of a "heat induced meltdown"

  • @WillSee11 ae911truth is the biggest bunch of lies on the web.

  • @WillSee11 it was a demolition and 47 floor of steel frame was not hit fell like a demolition in just 6 seconeds and you think US gov r telling the truth

  • Building 7 and the Twin Towers were controlled demolition jobs.

  • @DanaGreenEyes Yes, and I only figured out recently why building 7 was demolished after the fact in the afternoon. Apparently the plane that was heading for it was somehow intercepted. The insurance fraudster needed that building destroyed even more than the others. Worldcom, Enron, American Express, Secret Service, IRS(inland revenue service NOT internal), asbestos etc related frauds. The whole shebang was masterminded by the same guy. Business banking with US attorney DHS Janet Napolitano. OMG

  • @DanaGreenEyes shut up

  • @blackjerryboymetal "YOur a liar"

    Prove it.

  • WTC7 instantly went from having enough structural integrity to support it to having 0. It instantly went from 0 acceleration to freefall rate of acceleration. And did so with almost perfect symmetry. This means that all structural support was virtually simultaneously & instantly cut. Fire does not do that, explosives do. So, ..How does "Tim Osmond" & co. sneak in and rig with explosives, a tightly secured building housing CIA DOD SEC SS FEMA etc... without getting caught? Can U say "inside job"?

  • @99blackorder

    Building 7: Most sensitive government buildings are constructed with built-in explosives designed to take the building down in the event the country is taken over by hostile forces. Much like a self-destruct charges on aircraft, missiles and other weaponry to render them useless to the enemy.

  • @iamazdavids Being a veteran, I am well aware of the contingency of destroying something rather than allowing an enemy force to commandeer it(like an out of fuel tank in a war zone). You make a good point and I have also entertained the same thought. But if that is the case with WTC7, why don't they just admit it. It's a reasonable enough explanation. People would understand.

  • @99blackorder

    First and most importantly...Thank You for your service to our country!!

    Perhaps they just want to keep it secret or they don't want goverment employees fearing their workplace can implode on them. Seems pretty stupid not to just admit it and stop all the speculation and hoopla surrounding it. But now that I think about it the more speculation and distraction the eaiser it is to call us nut jobs.

  • @iamazdavids "First and most importantly...Thank You for your service to our country!!"

    Thank you and you're welcome. However, I fail to see how delivering a bunch of bombs to be dropped on innocent Bosnians serves the US. I am, indirectly, a glorified baby killer. But thank you anyway.

  • @iamazdavids My guess is that it wasn't rigged to blow in the event of invasion. The reason they didn't make that more than reasonable claim is that they would have to show that ALL similar buildings were rigged the same, as well as tie up the MANY loose ends(anyone that could counter that claim). It would be too messy/complicated of a lie.

  • @99blackorder

    I think someone at some time rigged that thing to come down. I've joked about starting an implosion company where we just start fires in buildings to initiate implosions. Some say that it takes weeks to rig a building for implosion but I bet a team of our special forces could do it in a very short time.

  • @iamazdavids Yes, I have heard interviews of controlled demo. experts say that it can be done in a relatively short period of time with enough manpower. All you would need to do would be to study the blueprints in advance and then send a team in. It only takes a couple of minutes to set a charge. Charges and thermite set in the right spots would be relatively easy as I understand it.

  • @iamazdavids "I've joked about starting an implosion company where we just start fires in buildings to initiate implosions."

    As ironically funny as that is, it makes a valid point by putting it into perspective. Indeed, if it was that easy, it would be done like that all of the time.

  • NOTICE: i did not see any 'black top hats' at any funerals (JEWS). THANX ALOT BUSH {not being racist but its a fact!}

  • @polo3mpr3stiny So you attended all the funerals???

  • All 3 WTC building were controlled demolition jobs the Twin Towers and building 7. If you study all the evidence you will see it was an inside job.

  • @Iobosanchez

    ...and what "evidence" is that, exactly?

  • especially building 7

  • Look up 9/11 conspiracies fact/fiction on the history channel website or on google, they will answer all your theories on 9/11

  • @soilder198 I saw that special on TV on 9/11/10. I notice that they did not choose to argue anything of any complexity or even touch the physics aspect of it AT ALL. They just picked on inconsequential easy to debunk points. All I saw was the history channel discrediting themselves with overly-simplistic arguments.

  • @99blackorder You are right the physics don't add up. The periods of freefall, projectiled concrete and steel shooting far away from the building, visible squibs, and blasts heard. 9/11 was definitely an inside job and a controlled demolition job.

  • @soilder198 If it was a "domino effect", then how do you explain the symmetry? As soon as the penthouse collapsed, the WHOLE BUILDING went into freefall acceleration. If it was as you explain, it would have happened in a progressive fashion from one side to the other.

  • Larry Silverstein is a dirty Jewish Devil. He is the anti-christ. I hope you burn in hell you zionist pig.

  • @Th3Pr0f3ssi0nal

    I hope the devil stuffs your mouth full of aardvark feces.

  • I agree!!! The US government did it!! We never landed on the moon!!! CIA sunk titanic!!!! Paul McCartney is dead!!! Aliens DID crash in Roswell and they are now hiding them!!!

  • @ungkarlmedstortu Yep, Paul McCartney's creative juices have been dead for some time now.

  • No, explosives were not used...no explosive residue was found

  • @CrazyRay7979 paid troll

  • Yeah, the government put an ad on Craigs List, "looking for some dudes to hijack planes and crash into buildings. This is a one-day job, and must be willing to sacrifice your life. Please reply." You people are so whacked if you believe this conspiracy crap.

  • Building 7 is the smoking gun.

    There are just to many things from all the crash sites that just don't add up...

    It's time to make the government show the confiscated surveillance tapes of the crash into the pentagon.

    Time to demand a new investigation by someone without any connection to the government

  • @lparian "Time to demand a new investigation by someone without any connection to the governmet"

    Oh really? Who should pay for that?

  • @PoetryHound 800 billion to Iraq so far to fight an unnecessary war. I guess you don't pay any taxes so it's non of your concern? Iraq was a direct result of 911.

  • @PoetryHound 800 billion to Iraq so far to fight an unnecessary war. I guess you don't pay any taxes so it's non of your concern? Iraq was a direct result of 911.

    I'm not sure how it should be paid for but it needs to be done.

  • @lparian I wasn't talking about Iraq, which was/is a waste of money. I was talking about the new 911 investigation you want.

  • @GoodyWillPwnJ00 I don't like Obama So in the end you like like aan autistic retard diagnosed with tourettes.

  • They didn't collapse in less then 10 seconds. There are plenty of videos that refute that statement with visual evidence.

  • @RevJoshua paid troll

  • @DellisHe Weirdo.

  • Respond to this video...  paid troll

  • @RevJoshua "They didn't collapse in less then 10 seconds."

    Indeed they did not. However, they did fall too fast to account for the level of resistance provided by multiple stories of concrete and steel. And "collapse" isn't a very good word for it. And speaking of "visual evidence", ...What I saw was an explosion from top to bottom throwing debris outward in all directions. What force was pushing downward if all/most of the debris had an outward trajectory?

  • @99blackorder That's what I'm saying!

  • @wtfftwo0oya try to repent against the great country that lets you live here in peace freely. Where would you go if you couldn't live here? Some communist country where you would be shot by some crazy ass guy who listens to other crazies that want to kill all? Anyways, you have no proof that he government did this. WE have proof that muslims did this. They made a threat video. You idiots. Get your heads out of your asses.

  • @RYSE12345 BAAAAAAAAHHHHHH BAAAAAAHHHHHHHH BAAAAAAAHHHHH

    SAVE US O BAAAAAAHHHHHH MA

    BAAAAAAAHAHHHHH BAAAAHHH BAAAAAHHHHHH

  • @wtfftwo0oya What are you talking about? You dumb ass crazy people aren't going to do shit. What can you do but stand outside of buildings with signs screaming other than have riot patrol come and kick your asses. You people only listen to what other people tell you to. We listen to the media because they are not crazy and the government has served us well. Some crazy idiot probably sat in his basement and made a youtube video about blaming the government and since people lke you only like to

  • I'm sad that 911 conspiracy theorists are fading away. I've enjoyed ridiculing them. I've tried laughing at creationists and holocaust deniers, but it's just not as much fun as mixing it up with the puffed up, self-important, paranoid 911 kooks.

  • @PoetryHound It must be true, some people just can't be woken up.

    Your county sponsored the bombs dropped on your own children durng WW2 and that sir is an undeniable historical fact.

  • @GoodyWillPwnJ00 "Your country sponsored the bombs . . .etc"

    Your comment shows that 911 kookspiracy theory has nothing to do with science or reason and everything to do with people's political agenda.

  • @PoetryHound paid troll

  • @wellifthemediasaysit I see no explosions in any corner and a building falling because it had gotten weak int eh center due to debris smashing into it. I did not listen to anybody. I make my own speculations. There is more evidence that it was a mid eastern plot to hurt America. I don't usually listen to crazy people that make up stupid acronyms and spend their lives trying to blame the government and news stations for problems. You people are phyco and need lives.

  • @RYSE12345 you sir are full of shit. tell the nwo we are coming for them.

  • What is a sheep? And where do you get the evidence that they demolated the building? I see a weak building falling after it was a couple hundred feet away from a huge building collapsing.

  • @RYSE12345 a sheep is short for sheeple, which is slang for people, who are spoon fed and believe everything they see, in this vid i see a building being demolished, i see a crimp in the roof, telltale explosions in the top right corner and a textbook drop into its own footprint!

  • perfect demolition. straight out the book!!!

  • Comment removed

  • @TheArmy19D You are the one who sounds nuts. Do you think they would walk inside the building in the middle of the day with a case that said explosives written on it? There were many inspections in the building just prior to 9/11. It would be quite simple to bring explosives in a vehicle in the basement at 3:00 am and have the elevator shut off to everyone else. The leaseholder Larry Silverstein obviously allowed this to happen thats why he changed his regular schedule and wasn't there.

  • I'm wondering how many people know that "lucky larry" and his kids had some fortunate events happen that kept them out of the towers that day.

    watch?v=9ScGZCqEyGM

  • @vik456 dude ur the smartest son of a bitch ever... that explains alot

  • humm... you only saw one side of the building.. you didn't see the other side of the building. If you did you will notice most of it is gone.

  • @orioncheung Most of the other side of the building 7 wasn't gone. If it had been then the building would have fell over sideways. It was a controlled demolition job. Thats why it fell so straight downwards at nearly freefall speed.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • I also think building 7 was the 4th target that was scheduled to be hit by a plane...but something went wrong and that one went down...as did building 7...just as planned. They were all hit with a flying object of some nature (plane, missile, drone) whatever the case it's not the reason any of those buildings went down. There were other factors which brought those buildings down...clearly!

  • 9/11 was an inside job. The WTC buildings were controlled demolition jobs blamed on Muslims with boxcutters. Its no wonder that 83% of Americans don't believe the governments official story.

  • Towers went down in 15 seconds, you want to correct that error.And no i am not beliver of offical story.

  • always enjoy guys who don't know SHIT about controlled demolitions telling us WTC7 was a controlled demolition !!!!!

  • Controlled demolition job for sure.

  • If ordinary office fires can bring down three tall steel reinforced towers on 9-11 who needs controlled demolition .....just light a match.

    Who are they trying to kid.

    Buildings do not fall down from office fires.....that is negligence

    BUT really we already should know by now it is CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

    No buildings reinforced with steel have fallen before or after 9-11

    suddenly into their own footprint.

    Wake up people

    vv vv vv dot 911oz dot c om search Building 7 or Thomas Gordon

  • @blavatsky3 ordinary fires? you mean 500 mph jumbo jets and all their fuel?

  • I am astonished at the fact that there are still people even questioning whether or not this building was a controlled demo. Are all of you who don't believe the kids that took auto shop instead of physics in high school? I'm guessing you did not pay attention in government class. Do you think Eisenhower's farewell address was the 1st episode of Punked? Do you think Kennedy was in his speech on secret societies was joking?

    Keep being ignorant, ignorance is bliss, but shut up.

  • Strange

  • And the LORD said to me, A conspiracy is found among the men of Judah, and among the inhabitants of Jerusalem

    Jeremiah 11:9

  • Yeah explosives were used. The terrorists planted them.

  • @oldrestless I'm not saying you're wrong, because I don't know. How would these Muslim terrorists plant bombs that perfectly, without being noticed, in a building that housed CIA, FBI, NSA...and many other agencies inside? Also, if they did do that, how retarded are our "Security" agencies...and why would we want to give them more power and money?(patriot act...cyber security act...homegrown terrorism act)

  • @oldrestless paid troll

  • Man 9/11 was a total demolition job for sure! The bastards responsible should pay with their lives.

  • let me ask this, were there any accounts of a series of loud explosions or a series of bright flashes seconds before the collapse of WTC 7. and for your information, wtc 2 fell in 14.75 seconds, not free fall speed, watch any video of the collapse and time it

  • @sgrocker45 Here you go. This video has three loud explosions that these firefighters are reacting to.( 9/11 Ground Explosions :: Firefighters: "7 Is Exploding" "I Know, I Know" )

  • @talltatguy Well a normal controlled demolition would have more than three loud explosions, and there is no explination of the absence of the flashes that controlled demolitions produce when detonated, plus wat video are u even talking abot, and how come no evidence of a controlled demo was ever found, like det cords, blasting caps, etc, in the debris, normally found from controlled demos, and how would u hide explosives from office workers days prior to 9/11

  • @sgrocker45 Considering they had moved everyone away from the lower levels where the flash would be seen, there would be no witness to a flash. The site was totally controlled during cleanup by the military and city, they effectively controlled the site and information as to what was found. If this WAS a CD, then the people that occupied the building would have been the ones who had done it. Such as CIA, FBI, and the many other GOV agencies in the building. Easy to control anyone seeing.

  • @talltatguy @talltatguy look, you could have seen numerous flashes coming from places other than the lower levels, you could have seen flashes from higher levels to. And you could have heard very loud explosions from building seconds b4 the collapse, i have seen numerous videos of the collapse and not one of them has those hallmarks of a controlled demo, there is a video on the sidebar to the right this is called wtc 7 collapse video compilation, watch it, study it, and look for those signs

  • @sgrocker45 I find no logical basis in science for the way NIST describes the collapse of this building. Now, this building has hallmarks of controlled demolition. People, Barry White, experienced explosions in the building. It fell essentially into its own footprint. FEMA debris field radius is at 70 ft. It descended straight down during it's collapse. It achieved free fall in it's collapse. None of these are traits of damage and fire induced failure, which would be very slow and in sections.

  • Idiot

  • i,m sick of the lies london was so obviously inside job .check out ripple effect 7 7

  • Who would buy a car without test-driving it or without popping the hood to have a look?

    How many of us would buy a car from someone who started calling you a "kook" for wanting to take it to a mechanic to have it checked out?

    Selling the official conspiracy theory depends 100% on there not being a legitimate investigation. If there's an investigation, it would be impossible for anyone in their right mind to buy the trash they're peddling.

  • Not a chance in hell some kind of help was not in place when these buildings came down. The odds of three buildings one that never got hit or had fuel in it collapsed in a perfect foot print is next to 0. I repeat not a chance in hell some element in our government did not know this was coming and played a role to make it more spectacular. Our government has some evil elements in it. Tonkin Bay ,Pearl Harbor, money boys needed another corporate war for profits.

  • you guys are funny WE ARE taling about THE i repeat THE UNITED STATES GOVERMENT probaly the most top secret goverment on this earth why in all of hell would they destroy building 7 without throwing a plane into it just blowing it up and letting people wonder what the hell happened over their it FUCKING RETARDED sure thier alot of evdience but hey use your minds the goverment didnt plan 9/11 why would they want to blow up the worldtrade centers?

  • @bebogerad14

    Um, what made the whooooole US support approve of attacking Afghanistan - and later Iraq ? Pictures of Two airliners slamming into the WTC and that's that or those of two airliners slamming into the WTC "making" the WTC also "collapse"?

    Apparently, you're the one not thinking. Why would war mongers ever do whatever needed to as easy as possible command obeying sheep out in the battle field? Why has it happened numerous times throughout history?

  • @Thetan1974 , what about the vans packed with explosives whose drivers the NYPD arrested? The vans had murals painted on the sides of planes slamming into the towers and exploding! FBI said they were Mossad agents. I'll bet it was just a coincidence that Mossage agents driving vans packed with high end explosives with murals painted on the sides of the twin towers with planes hitting them was just a coincidence. Thank God, otherwise that could be anti-semitic LOL :)

  • @bebogerad14 . why do they need to fly a plane into Building 7? They can just do a controlled demolition. Most people won't question or take their eyes off Jerry Springer for more than a minute to pay attention or care. And that is EXACTLY what happened :)

  • @marcpinke

    10-4, potner.

    And now they try to make it look like 7 WAS rigged for demolition - but it still coincidentially fell perfectly from a few office fires.

    prisonplanet. com/bombshell-silverstein-want­ed-to-demolish-building-7-on-9­11. html

    That building 7 came down from a CD is now SO damn obvious to 99% of people looking at the matter.

    Silverstein made HUGE insurance fraud. A super rich guy like that made f*cking insurance fraud - and still gets away with it!

    Despicable!!

  • @Thetan1974 The insurance companies wouldn't have paid a penny if they thought it was insurance fraud. All the insurance payouts have gone to rebuilding, not to Silverstein's pockets.

  • The building must have been held together with string. It's the only logical answer as to why it fell the way it did. Those fires must have burned through the string.

  • Free fall speed means its falling into a vacuum, as admitted by NIST

    I wonder what on earth can cause that?

    Fortunately I haven't got a mental block with the word explosives.

    EXPLOSIVES, controlled demoltion all would make a vacuum.

    The building just falling "due to fire" wouldn't.

    mm EXPLOSIVES I love that word.

    I like CONTROLLED DEMOLITION too.

  • every 9/11 conspiracy has been debunked. wake the fuck up idiots!

  • @fruitybud420 First of all, look up the word conspiracy in the dictionary before you use it in a sentence. Since I know you wont do it here it is "a secret agreement between two or more people to perform an unlawful act". So, according to the definition, even IF the government story is true, which is is so obviously not, it would still be a conspiracy. More than one person conspired to make this happen, the question is who conspired, not IF someone did. ROFL

  • omg its fake government didnt do it

  • All 3 WTC buildings were controlled demolition jobs.

  • @L0LCATS3111

    Why would they need to have building 7 collapse? Even one plane hitting one tower would have been enough for their supposed reason to go to war, the towers didn't need to be completely demolished.

    It wouldn't have been necessary to have another rather nodescript building demolished.

    Also, do you think all of the explosives necessary to demolish the buildings, with the attached wiring, could have been installed without anyone asking questions?

  • Silverstein is a liar.

  • What a horrible thing that our own government intentionally allowed this to happen. God will punish those responsible.

  • "They" is Bush Sr. The former director of the CIA. Sandanistas, Iraq, and Desert shield.Plus, 9/11 and who knows what else?? He is one scary MFer! Little Bush was installed as Pres(via a little election rigging in Jeb's state of Fla) to further Sr's influence. If you want to know where trillions of our dollars went, look in Senor Bushes pocket. I don't know what he will do with it when he finally dies. Maybe that's what he is paying Satan with!

  • Since when is a Fire department trained to take down buildings with explosives ?

  • using the simple no-resistance equation (1/2)at^2 = x. x is building height, t is time to fall, a is the acceleration, you plug it all in and get that the the building fell at 10 m/s^2. that is the acceleration due to gravity. wow this shit is true

  • The building was a controlled demolition job. Silverstein should be hung to death.

  • This is the holy grail of what really happened on 9/11.

    The question is, what can people do about it?

    We can rebel.

  • Fuck you Silverstein. How would you like to be a victim of assassination?

  • Want ot expose 9/11?

    Stop paying federal icome tax.

    The best part is it's all legal.

    Don't pretend to care if you don't take any action.

  • all 3 WTC buildings were controlled demolition jobs. All 3 had periods of freefall, all three had symetrical collapses, and all 3 had squibs blasting out the sides of the buildings.

  • Still can't believe the Bush "Nazi" family is getting away with the murder of over 3,000 people.their also partly responsible for a Presidential assassination.

    Rot in hell your sons of bitches!

  • guys just look up what companies had floors and occupied space in building 7. Its simple. First time in history that buildings implode cause of "FIRE". Fires happen every day. What are others buildings around the world not "IMPLODING" due to fires?

  • PEOPLE ASK.. WHY NUMBER 7. This building had a floor that was the COMMAND CENTER for this ATTACK/OPERATION. The CIA, Secret Service, IRS, NAIC Securities, Securities & Exchange Commission, Mayors Office of Emergency Management, to name a few had space in this building.This building was behind it and controlled it all. You Bring it down, You kill the EVIDENCE. WAKE UP SHEEPS.

  • @Vik456 I believe you are right.

  • @Vik456 How is it the rubble pile is higher for WTC 7 than for either 1 or 2?

  • @Vik456 Where did you get that evidence? I need to see that!

  • @knicks3085 Well, if you just google Building 7 and companies that had offices, you'll see I'm not lying, and about it being the BRAINS of the operation, they explained that in a film I saw back in 2002. I'll try to find it online and send it your way.. Building 7 was like a federal building. I live in the city and remember when the Mayor was showing the Emergency Management Center on the news 1 year before 9/11.

  • @Vik456 Of course.

    I already knew this was an inside job, but i your comment just made me learn something new.

  • I guess it Imploded by itself.

    I can,t believe that people could be that stupid.I used to hear that a person is Smart but people are Stupid as PHUCK,and be easily manipulated.

    I guess it was all true

  • It is so obvious that building 7 was a controlled demolition job.

  • According to the official conspiracy theory, the laws of nature took the day off on 9/11/2001. And so did the US military!

  • Most people already know that the WTC buildings were controlled demolition jobs.

  • On 9/11 the WTC buildings were controlled demolition jobs. Barry Jennings who worked in WTC 7 gave testimony that there were explosives going off in the building and soon after he was silenced for speaking the truth. RIP Barry Jennings.

  • Over *1000* architects and engineers are demanding a legitimate investigation.

    There are also hundreds of reputable scientists, firefighters, scholars, legal professionals, media professionals, retired military personnel of every service and rank, members of congress and former politicians of every description, plus an overwhelming majority of the American people, yet there remains a virtual media blackout on the issue.

    What's wrong with this picture?

    Support a legitimate investigation.

  • they had to implode it due to fire aparrently

    this is what i know

    an implosion of that scale and collapse type would of taken roughly 5 hours to set up. the only reason it takes weeks to set up most implosions is to expose the support beams for the charges. in an emergency like 911 they can get rid of a building quick. the demolition team just straps the explosives to the walls near the support beams and used over size charges.

    but if this where true the gov would of told use this right away

  • I am a Fire Fighter in Ft. Lauderdale florida and we have many high rises here so I have been in many high rise fires. What you wrote doesnt even make sense. Sometimes we will let a fire burn and let it consume its fuel, but we dont implode buildings. Let alone do we run into burning buildings with explosives haha. It was clearly imploded but the fire fighters nor a "demolition team" did not set it up. They were steel insulated I-beams that building was not going anywhere.

  • All 3 WTC buildings were controlled demolition jobs.