Love the interpretation, personally. This music is fixing my ears, it's the only way I find to describe it. Instinctive, understandable and powerful. I have no concern with comparison to other interpretations. What he creates here stands on its own and makes sense. Bravo Boris!
This is a fascinating performance. After giving Berezovsky a shower of abuse for how he played the B-flat Prelude from this opus, I am quite happy to see he is capable of those very flights of imagination so obviously lacking in the B-flat Prelude's performance. This has "gimmicks" that might start to be annoying after repeated listening, but he shows that he is capable of projecting original musical ideas into an often played piece so as to make it sound fresh again. Well worth posting.
@89hedgehog I agree about Horowitz and Gilels, with Horowitz's being my favorite. Berezovsky's although somewhat original, has some elements that make you want to dismiss it at first; just as with Cziffra's.
Is this really Boris? After watching him play the transcendentals perfectly in one sitting I have a hard time believing this is him... maybe it's older? idk
Very good, although the tempo's sometimes unclear. I agree, Gilel's is really the reference for this one, although you could argue that Kissin's version is not as good, but actually pretty interesting.
As for the Prelude, to me it is Richter, Gilels and Lugansky - аnd all others. Richter's interpretation seems most accurate and similar to Rachmaninoff's own, Gilel's just genious as all of him, and Lugansky plays something in between of those two...
hm...1 minute applauses and 1 min-silence. why? A think it´s a little bit exagerated in profit of Berezovksy, but not Rachmaninov.But well,now we know,that this man has emotions too)thank you for uploading.
I wouldn't rate it so highly in my opinion, maybe I just feel he loses the sense of the march sometimes. However, I've got to applaud his originality. He's like Rachmaninoff - he makes it sound entirely his own, rather than recycled.
He screws up a few times I hear, but I still like it. Not as good as Valentina Lisitsa
sweetcharlie63 2 months ago
Comment removed
1Thompsonmusic 2 months ago
Love the interpretation, personally. This music is fixing my ears, it's the only way I find to describe it. Instinctive, understandable and powerful. I have no concern with comparison to other interpretations. What he creates here stands on its own and makes sense. Bravo Boris!
hadricalifornia 6 months ago
Феноменальный Музыкант !!!
Gusakov 6 months ago
Beautiful
lierlierlierleir 7 months ago
@Haeronthegreat Agree.Berezovsky has amazing technic but I don't think it is well interpreted.
Chiu19931993 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
rach.prokofief.gilels,horowitz ,val,kissin!! i like the prokofief version very much is slower but very emotional
papcyrill 8 months ago
My goodness what an interpretation. This man is so precise in what he's saying, I love it
hadricalifornia 10 months ago
great playing! I really enjoy this and I think my tempo should be faster. Please feel free to listen to my interpretation of this work!
piano0011 1 year ago
This is a fascinating performance. After giving Berezovsky a shower of abuse for how he played the B-flat Prelude from this opus, I am quite happy to see he is capable of those very flights of imagination so obviously lacking in the B-flat Prelude's performance. This has "gimmicks" that might start to be annoying after repeated listening, but he shows that he is capable of projecting original musical ideas into an often played piece so as to make it sound fresh again. Well worth posting.
mvolkov11 1 year ago
Has anyone heard Rachmaninoff playing 23/5 ? the clip is on you tube :-)))
Have to go with Rach, Gilels and Horowitz on 23/5. All others don't come close being on the same planet !!!
89hedgehog 1 year ago 3
@89hedgehog I agree about Horowitz and Gilels, with Horowitz's being my favorite. Berezovsky's although somewhat original, has some elements that make you want to dismiss it at first; just as with Cziffra's.
leothepet 1 year ago
Comment removed
89hedgehog 1 year ago
@leothepet I must say, 23/5 is one piece I've never liked Horowitz on, thought it sounded horrid, my favourite is either Berezovsky or Richter...
OverFjell 8 months ago
@89hedgehog You must have forgotten Evgeny Kissin!
lison766 1 year ago
@89hedgehog
You should check out Nikolai Ligansky's version...it's quite fantastic.
keetner 1 year ago
Comment removed
papcyrill 8 months ago
Though I prefer to keep the rhythm, but it is absolutely beautiful and convincing.
sseerrgg14 1 year ago
very average
izzaboutime 1 year ago
@izzaboutime to even finish the piece deserves high praise, let alone play it as well has he does.
LoftyProduction 1 year ago
Yeah, rach playing this sounds very lyrical compared to other interpretations. I do like the clear sound of the rendition though.
linkubusam 1 year ago
Nice one - but I prefer Valentinas version ;)
tdalman 1 year ago 2
Is this really Boris? After watching him play the transcendentals perfectly in one sitting I have a hard time believing this is him... maybe it's older? idk
snowboarderxzxz 2 years ago
Very good, although the tempo's sometimes unclear. I agree, Gilel's is really the reference for this one, although you could argue that Kissin's version is not as good, but actually pretty interesting.
stilldasayme 2 years ago
gilels just absolutely owns this piece, its a name thats always tied with this piece.......
LetTheMusicFlow1 2 years ago 3
As for the Prelude, to me it is Richter, Gilels and Lugansky - аnd all others. Richter's interpretation seems most accurate and similar to Rachmaninoff's own, Gilel's just genious as all of him, and Lugansky plays something in between of those two...
CarapaxSPb 2 years ago 2
Lol,he calls like Boris Berezovsky,the jewish oligarch who stole half Russia after fall of soviet union
ArturoAlejandroS 2 years ago
Yes, unfortunate coincidence, but this luckily is not the GANGSTER.
Mazurka1001 2 years ago
Lugansky's is the best of the best
graciascomp 2 years ago 3
hm...1 minute applauses and 1 min-silence. why? A think it´s a little bit exagerated in profit of Berezovksy, but not Rachmaninov.But well,now we know,that this man has emotions too)thank you for uploading.
vint22 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Many mistakes and tempo changing. Not very impressive.
Matticitt 3 years ago
yea. because you have to keep the same tempo at rachmaninoff pieces. what a bullshit
zEXXXY 2 years ago
i have to say that his prelude in g minor is not really good.. ashkenazy, richter, gilels plays better.. still love bere though
rvn10rvn17 3 years ago
nice description :))
deandusk 3 years ago
yes...too much pedal for me too ;-)
alexdoulou 3 years ago 2
I wouldn't rate it so highly in my opinion, maybe I just feel he loses the sense of the march sometimes. However, I've got to applaud his originality. He's like Rachmaninoff - he makes it sound entirely his own, rather than recycled.
Haeronthegreat 3 years ago 10
Agree on the originality.
ghostpianist 3 years ago 2
Very different, as things usually are with Boris. Maybe too much pedal at the beginning for me. Certainly has a lot of power behind it.
Haeronthegreat 3 years ago 6