Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
i think he said 24 fps that cant be true and if it is thats unacceptable from a tv jeez i mean 30 at least but for this tv 60fps should be the standard
xGHOSTTxDEMONICx 1 year ago
@xGHOSTTxDEMONICx He meant that the refresh rate can be pulled down from the native 50Hz (60 in NTSC) to 24Hz, which is what movies are shot in.
vantageIIx 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The first Sharp TV to get LED back lighting technology is the Sharp aquos LC 52 LE 700 UN. Additional features include UltraBrilliant LED system, a 120Hz refresh RATE THAT reduces motion blur and a viewing angle of 176 degrees. If you can do without the wireless internet connection and other more savvy widgets, then this TV is your best bet.
visit us at ledtvscreens(dot)org
ledtvscreens 1 year ago
10000 euros?!?! heheheheh, europe sucks!!!!
goran2009 2 years ago
thats what we need, 100 megehertz TVs!!
konmak 2 years ago 2
i dont get the point of making it thin
thenewsupermariobro 2 years ago
0.42 not megaherz but just herz u full, and its not the first time hes making this mistake
lowxfx 2 years ago
i dont get the big deal about how this is so thin. Laptop screens are still thinner so whats the big deal?
lschlachter1 2 years ago
funny that was the price of the first HDTV, well around there anyways. and that was like what 2002 or something....man we have come a long way, to bad for the price though, big doubt for something that might die within a few years =(
y35n00b5 3 years ago
13k and its not even standalone? we have enough boxes and wires already, we don't need anymore... Back to the drawing board Sharp!
Ensureqwerty 3 years ago
$13,919.0 US dollars? Bloody hell!
TenshihanQuinn 3 years ago 6