The alarmists even admit that AGW is not falsifiable meaning that it is not even a valid scientific theory. Catastrophic GW is an extraordinary claim that is lacking the accompanying extraordinary evidence that rational scientists require i.e. not scientists who are receiving big UN funding to help push their collectivist agenda. Don't forget that the UN was founded by people like the Rockefellars who often write about their desire to abolish nations and have central planning.
Right wingers are such disingenuous wankers. Global warming is NOT a religion. It has 100 years of science behind it. And ALL the worlds top scientific institutions agree! It is falsifiable by giving PEER REVIEWED evidence for what is causing the warming of not CO2 or show that long wave radiation photons are not absorbed by CO2. Oh and the real nail in the coffin for this wankler's anti science stance is the fact that Christianity is a religion therefore that is wrong I take it? Hmmm...
wow, Krauthammer certainly hammered the point home. Global warming is a religion, otherwise we would see some evidence that contradicts the theory. Rather all that we see is vague statements without fact. Glad to see the truth is getting out on this scam.
Al's explanation is correct higher temperatures, more water vapor (not 4% though), more precipitation. In the winter that precip falls mainly as snow. QED
(see VXDJLcdv0jk)
OK, Krauthammer - show me the evidence that presuades a single climatologist that GW is not real.
@drkstrong Scum, stop spamming links to your crappy videos.
Pay to be featured.
Jews have always been nigs.
man-made GW = too many people = many must die = martial law, carbon tax, rfid chips, fema camps, fema coffins, georgia guidestones paragraph 1 completed, jews as only people on Earth
Shove your false science up your ugly jewish ass, scum !
@greenman3610 Wow. @DownNWO may have just won a new Funniest Denier Posting Ever. The free-association makes Glenn Beck look sane - I love how he concludes @drkstrong MUST be jewish because he cited a source.
The name of @drkstrong aka @dicksoft is Keith Strong, he works at NASA Goddard center, climate modification and population sustainability department (aka depopulation department).
You can find data on him by a simple google search.
Wow, who cares about Al Gore? Scientists around the world have been studying this and have verified it to be happening. Al Gore Al Gore, it's all the deniers have.
@superduperjew Explain to me just how glowbaal warming occurs... What is the height to extinction of CO2 at 380 ppm? ______________ (you answer). At that height, what factor is convection and conduction relative to radiation? If you modeled the sun at some ratio to the ambient landscape at 300 kelvin where the landscape is 1 unit, what would be the energy of the sun at modeled temperature? 10 times? 30 times? 70 times? (pick one...German government has the answer...) let me know...
@superduperjew Answer key. 40 ft., 70 units. Convection and conduction are 69 units of 70. Only 1 unit is radiation. So, we are only talking about 1 in 70 units that actually deals with CO2. That 1 unit being radiated (at 300k), CO2 saturates at 40 ft from the object in question. Adding more "filter" (CO2) does nothing because there are no more frequencies to absorb. All that happens is the height to extinction changes. Double CO2, HTE goes from 40 to 20 ft. BIg deal. Zero effect
@seaplaneguy1 I have a simple answer for all of that. Do your research, stop cherry picking which scientists to agree with based on your bias. Extreme weather events are occuring much more frequently, unless you are living in a hole, you'd know this. You've made a ton of strawmen you could knock down, which is funny. It doesn't just have to do with OUR intake of ppm, but how much blankets areas, creating heated environments. More water=higher seas=more evaporation=more precipitation=simple logic
@superduperjew You wouldn't know research if it sat on you face little girl. Talk about the ice core data debocle - you alarmists never did clear up that little snafu.
@cano21 Junk science? 97% of climatologists know warming to be true. So does NASA and NOAA when they say last year was the warmest on record and the last decade was the warmest on record.
Hey Dorothy! The debate is over. It has been for a long time. The science is proven fact. Your side lost so stop whining and lying!
@detoth67 97% of climatologists? LOL!! You can't seriously believe that number that was fed to you by the enviro-nutters? 97% - that's too funny! It's more like 70%-30% (and the 30% of "deniers" aren't receiving gov't money to research the harms of GW - follw the money)
@cano21 You obviously know more than every climatologist on earth, please share with us the information you have access to that they do not. To make the case that global warming is a hoax, someone would have to believe that environmentalists and political liberals control businesses and industries worldwide as well as the legislative bodies and scientific institutions of every developed nation in the world. That would be a hard case to make.
The alarmists even admit that AGW is not falsifiable meaning that it is not even a valid scientific theory. Catastrophic GW is an extraordinary claim that is lacking the accompanying extraordinary evidence that rational scientists require i.e. not scientists who are receiving big UN funding to help push their collectivist agenda. Don't forget that the UN was founded by people like the Rockefellars who often write about their desire to abolish nations and have central planning.
ComicPenius 2 weeks ago
Praise Gaia! Science Blasphemers!
MrApplewine 1 month ago
wake up sheeples, global warming is so corporations can profit off your ignorance. there was no holocaust, moon landing, 9/11....everything is fake
sausagesnail 3 months ago
Watching Krauthammer school those mental midgets on Inside Washington is one of life's simple pleasures.
DankWin 1 year ago 2
Right wingers are such disingenuous wankers. Global warming is NOT a religion. It has 100 years of science behind it. And ALL the worlds top scientific institutions agree! It is falsifiable by giving PEER REVIEWED evidence for what is causing the warming of not CO2 or show that long wave radiation photons are not absorbed by CO2. Oh and the real nail in the coffin for this wankler's anti science stance is the fact that Christianity is a religion therefore that is wrong I take it? Hmmm...
StunnedByStupidity 1 year ago
wow, Krauthammer certainly hammered the point home. Global warming is a religion, otherwise we would see some evidence that contradicts the theory. Rather all that we see is vague statements without fact. Glad to see the truth is getting out on this scam.
Dodger481 1 year ago
Global Warming Is not A Religion.
They do share a curious number of traits though,
ivlfounder 1 year ago
There is a caveat in Krauthammer's demagoguery. Religion has no evidence. There is no proof anything any religion has is actually fact.
Global warming has mounds of evidence and undeniable proof.
Therefore his opinion is just blathering noise to get attention. Not serious logic.
detoth67 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@detoth67 Sure, there are a lot of evidence if you are a moron.
DownNWO 1 year ago
Why do Republicans deny man-made global warming? Do they also brush off their doctors' diagnoses, too?
Towncrier123 1 year ago
The null hypotheses anyone?
TheTempestSpark 1 year ago
Aka. The Church Of Climatology.
haeresy 1 year ago
Al's explanation is correct higher temperatures, more water vapor (not 4% though), more precipitation. In the winter that precip falls mainly as snow. QED
(see VXDJLcdv0jk)
OK, Krauthammer - show me the evidence that presuades a single climatologist that GW is not real.
drkstrong 1 year ago
@drkstrong Scum, stop spamming links to your crappy videos.
Pay to be featured.
Jews have always been nigs.
man-made GW = too many people = many must die = martial law, carbon tax, rfid chips, fema camps, fema coffins, georgia guidestones paragraph 1 completed, jews as only people on Earth
Shove your false science up your ugly jewish ass, scum !
DownNWO 1 year ago
@greenman3610 Wow. @DownNWO may have just won a new Funniest Denier Posting Ever. The free-association makes Glenn Beck look sane - I love how he concludes @drkstrong MUST be jewish because he cited a source.
TempestStormwind 1 year ago
@TempestStormwind My young idiot.
The name of @drkstrong aka @dicksoft is Keith Strong, he works at NASA Goddard center, climate modification and population sustainability department (aka depopulation department).
You can find data on him by a simple google search.
What are you going to say now, dickhead ?
DownNWO 1 year ago
ya burn baby burn
coyoteewater 1 year ago
Wow, who cares about Al Gore? Scientists around the world have been studying this and have verified it to be happening. Al Gore Al Gore, it's all the deniers have.
superduperjew 1 year ago
@superduperjew Explain to me just how glowbaal warming occurs... What is the height to extinction of CO2 at 380 ppm? ______________ (you answer). At that height, what factor is convection and conduction relative to radiation? If you modeled the sun at some ratio to the ambient landscape at 300 kelvin where the landscape is 1 unit, what would be the energy of the sun at modeled temperature? 10 times? 30 times? 70 times? (pick one...German government has the answer...) let me know...
seaplaneguy1 1 year ago
@seaplaneguy1
How long can you tread water?
cardcreekdesign 1 year ago
@superduperjew Answer key. 40 ft., 70 units. Convection and conduction are 69 units of 70. Only 1 unit is radiation. So, we are only talking about 1 in 70 units that actually deals with CO2. That 1 unit being radiated (at 300k), CO2 saturates at 40 ft from the object in question. Adding more "filter" (CO2) does nothing because there are no more frequencies to absorb. All that happens is the height to extinction changes. Double CO2, HTE goes from 40 to 20 ft. BIg deal. Zero effect
seaplaneguy1 1 year ago
@seaplaneguy1 I have a simple answer for all of that. Do your research, stop cherry picking which scientists to agree with based on your bias. Extreme weather events are occuring much more frequently, unless you are living in a hole, you'd know this. You've made a ton of strawmen you could knock down, which is funny. It doesn't just have to do with OUR intake of ppm, but how much blankets areas, creating heated environments. More water=higher seas=more evaporation=more precipitation=simple logic
superduperjew 1 year ago
@superduperjew The deniers have the facts too. Yep, this junk science has finally been debunked. DOH!
cano21 1 year ago
@cano21 I would suggest you turn off Rush and Faux, and do some real research.
superduperjew 1 year ago
@superduperjew You wouldn't know research if it sat on you face little girl. Talk about the ice core data debocle - you alarmists never did clear up that little snafu.
cano21 1 year ago
@cano21 Little girl? Nice one, please just educate yourself further on the subject.
superduperjew 1 year ago
@cano21 Junk science? 97% of climatologists know warming to be true. So does NASA and NOAA when they say last year was the warmest on record and the last decade was the warmest on record.
Hey Dorothy! The debate is over. It has been for a long time. The science is proven fact. Your side lost so stop whining and lying!
detoth67 1 year ago
@detoth67 By NASA you mean the ones that faked moonlanding ?
Right ...
Sure, I believe them.
DownNWO 1 year ago
@DownNWO Faked moon landing? Oh brother!
detoth67 1 year ago
@detoth67 NASA moonlanding video:
watch?v=kFAZoVGxqY4
One jew defending other jews ..... interesting ....
DownNWO 1 year ago
@detoth67 97% of climatologists? LOL!! You can't seriously believe that number that was fed to you by the enviro-nutters? 97% - that's too funny! It's more like 70%-30% (and the 30% of "deniers" aren't receiving gov't money to research the harms of GW - follw the money)
cano21 1 year ago
@cano21 You obviously know more than every climatologist on earth, please share with us the information you have access to that they do not. To make the case that global warming is a hoax, someone would have to believe that environmentalists and political liberals control businesses and industries worldwide as well as the legislative bodies and scientific institutions of every developed nation in the world. That would be a hard case to make.
superduperjew 1 year ago