Added: 3 years ago
From: UCtelevision
Views: 11,428
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (30)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • Watching this because of Biol 1030H?

    

  • @MrHennessy1303 yeap (n)

  • Comment removed

  • @MrHennessy1303 tyler u buckethead...ill still body ur ass, u lil punk

  • My grandfather was a Presbyterian minister and he believed in evolution. He often said science tells you how and the Bible tells you Who.

  • boring as hell

  • Fruit flies piss me off. Someone in a lab on the same floor as mine does work with them. Heaven help the person that's eating an apple or orange.

    Interesting video, although not what I was looking for, I was hoping for more info on the homeobox. There's not much on it this gene sequence, at least in terms of lectures.

  • absolutely fascinating. thank you for uploading this.

  • @Mayartay

    Behe and his arguments that were detailed in Darwins black box were beaten down badly when they were brought to court in Dover. In addition his views have not survived peer review.

  • @rapton Yeah Behe isn't even really a legitimate scientist, church funding is the only reason he has any kind of recognition.

  • it is like comparing engineering to emotions and stupid evolutionist are happy to do that.

  • It's pretty ignorant (or at least, insulting to the viewer) for any biologist to compare biological organisms with material objects even for the sake of illustration.

  • But it's okay when a creationist does it, the comparison of an organism to a watch and painting.

  • The creationists' purpose is to emphasize biological complexity in order to show by analogy that there must be a designer.

    Darwinists such as McGinnis, however, have a purpose which is exactly opposite. He deceptively acts as if life is extremely simple in order to convince people that it appeared by chance (& n.s.).

    He gave a tipoff right before springing the deception by falsely stating that we're "no smarter than" they were 50-200 years ago. Read "Darwin's Black Box" by Behe.

  • he says "uh/um" a lot :/

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • coz he is "lying" a lot.

  • Regardless of past evidence including current observations, the fossil record and selective breeding, genetic evidence for evolution is overwhelming. This new link with embryology has provided even more ways to look at evolution and phylogeny.

  • Feel free to argue with ideas from 120 years ago. No biologist has agreed with Haeckel's drawings or ideas for decades, lest they be uneducated! The fact is that evolutionarily linked species share common features early in EMBRYONIC development.

  • And yes, the mathematics DO ADD UP, when you take into account all relevant factors, like mutation, plasmid transfer (bacteria), sexual recombination, and simply using the same old genes in new ways...see the work of Sean Carroll. All of course via natural selection.

  • I used to believe the world and all of life was created in 6 days . . . but now I am not so sure.

  • yeah, I am in the same boat. I try to keep an open mind...

  • I think it is excellent that you are considering these contradictory ideas. Being able to challenge your current dominant views is a difficult but transformative task!

    And your post is a year old, i wonder how far you have come now.

    =O)

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more