"KEEP YOUR EYE ON THAT BUILDING, THAT THING IS COMING DOWN. WE ARE WALKING BACK BECAUSE THE BUILDING IS ABOUT TO BLOW UP", said NYFD seconds before WTC7 collapsed. (YouTube: WTC 7: The Smoking Gun of 9/11)
"The whole time you're hearing BOMB BOMB BOMB BOMB...I think I know what explosion is...I wanna know what took that building down, IT WASN'T FIRE & CERTAINLY WASN'T A PLANE."
-Craig Bartmer, NYPD officer (YouTube: WTC 7: The Smoking Gun of 9/11)
Here the whole structure falls at once, after the charges. Each tower in NY begin to collapse where the plane collided. No explosives are to be heard (which doesn't mean there are not explosions, due from a lot of stuff in the towers). As for the thermite... that's just silly. With the common one you need tons of it, not to mention something to keep it in place against the walls, and then you have to ignite it, making a hell of a light show, and that goes for the nano thermite as well.
@forgetfuldays Hey numbnuts, the building was on fire for 8 hours. Two of the largest buildings on earth had just collapsed because they were hit by giant airplanes going 500 miles per hour. Ground zero was an absolute disaster area. Do you think perhaps, these "explosions" came from more realistic sources commonly found inside commercial buildings? If explosives were used, then all cameras would have clearly captured the audio, and not just a few "small explosions" heard by a few witnesses.
@DanSVT03 hey numbnuts, tell me an instance when fire + steel = explosions. The steel is covered in concrete, so what other "realistic" sources are you speaking of? Unless of course you think concrete can explode when heated. The person who designed the building actually testifies AGAINST that theory, even today.
With all the noise from emergency vehicles, personnel, and a large crowd in disarray, it was easier for the film cameras to capture the visual and not the audio.../sigh...
@forgetfuldays If you knew anything about commercial buildings, you would know that they are filled with things like electrical switchgear, HVAC equipment, fuel tanks for generators, emergency backup battery plants (UPS plants) compressed air tanks for pneumatics, compressed gas tanks (propane, oxygen, acetylene) etc etc.
All of which can and will explode violently if damaged or on fire. Ask me how I know all of this...
@forgetfuldays "With all the noise from emergency vehicles, personnel, and a large crowd in disarray, it was easier for the film cameras to capture the visual and not the audio.../sigh..."
So you're saying that the sounds of emergency vehicles and large crowds drowned out the sounds of the necessary amount of explosives needed to demolish two of the worlds largest buildings, plus another 47 story building, even with 50+ cameras pointed at ground zero...
@DanSVT03 oh wow, you only comment that the audio can't be heard but discount video and the testimony of witness', firefighters and police on the scene? You my friend are one to laugh at.
@forgetfuldays What the fuck are you talking about? I just listed a bunch of things that could all cause an explosion inside a building in the event of a fire or if damaged. I'm not arguing that people didn't hear or even saw explosions. I'm arguing that they didn't come from commercial explosives. Show me one bit of proof that there was any type of commercial explosive used on 9/11 and that the explosions witnesses reported did not come from the realistic sources I just listed.
Listen to the extreme sound of the charges going off. All the hundreds of videos from New York never picked up anything even remotely similar that, even though most of them were much closer. And don't try saying the government confiscated ALL the films, edited out the noise, then gave them back again.
that proves that 911 was planned because the twin towers fell veritcally and a bomb or a plane would cause a different type of smoke not a gray colored one.
I know that the three skyscrapers that were each leveled in Manhattan on September 11, 2001 weren't the result of controlled demolition, but do you believe they were all leveled by fire and gravity?
@MineCrafterMcFly that because there was lots of noise that day and the people that had filmed it wasn't that close.. these guys are in clear view and sound of the building.. you can believe the official story if you like.. no one if forcing you not to..
@sheyon1000 I used to be into 911 conspiracy theories. I understand why you are too. Its a good feeling to believe you have secret knowledge that the world leaders want kept from the sheeple, however, I have come to terms with reality and realize 911 conspiracies for the load of bollocks they are.
If you are a truth seeker, search "Truth Contest" in Google and click on the 1st result, then open The Present and read what it says. Everyone needs to see this. The Present will turn this world right-side up if it reaches enough people. You will see what I mean when you read the first page.
@juiceforjoe yeah, and that was only 30 stories....no wonder it didn't look anything like the trade towers. If you knew anything about implosions, you would see the trade towers and building 7 were OBVIOUSLY purposely imploded. The whole thing was planned...........disagree if you want....doesn't change my mind.
That's exactly how religious people think. Faith conquers all despite the facts. the 9/11 truth movement is just another religion for lost sheep who need a sense of importance in their lives.
@SirRobertDole2 on the contrary, my religious beliefs have nothing at all to do with how I think buildings become a pile of pulverized concrete. If anyone else wants to respond to my comment, just be aware that you will not drag me into this game I've said what I think, just like everyone else has, and I won't be insulted by someone insinuating that I am that stupid. Chow, and have fun with your debates.
I wasn't referring to your religious beliefs. Actually, I hadn't even noticed that your name was "jtaforJesus" until after I'd posted that.
What I meant to say was that many 9/11 truthers and conspiracy theorist groups operate like cults or religious fundamentalists in the way that they tend to find only evidence that supports their claim. Anything that might contradict their way of thinking is dismissed as the lies of ignorant "sheep."
@SirRobertDole2 no offense taken. I totally agree with your point, seen in a different light. i've seen it happening all over the internet. Enjoy the rest of the week. And thank you for your clarification =)
@juiceforjoe Actually you're correct to a certain extent, BUT in this demolition the explosives were equalized. Notice how the explosives were scattered all over the building, a technique thus causing it to collapse all at once rather than to pancake. The twin towers did pancake but because the technique was different. Instead of scattering explosives they blew out the floors under each other thus causing a "pancake" like collapse. Do som research, don't assume. Ask Questions, Demand Answers.
Please, God. I know I don't ask for much, but please oh please don't let there be a bunch of idiots quarreling over their idiotic 9/11 conspiracy theories.
@DarksporkLeader well, look at the bright side of it...you can ignore it and go to another video. That's the easiest thing to do ...not trying to be sarcastic
one thing i cannot get my brain past,to even leave behind for a moment,is this.Money _is_number_one_period.(.) (?).right?your health,etc.,are all far back seat to money-ok. sorry here it is...IF You can not GUARANTEE (that a building X mass by Y size and above)"somehow"catastrophic failure on the VERTICLE plane,you will find noone 2 insure u.i know this is true.
@Acceptable76 So let me guess you are smarter than architects and engineers with batchelor and master degree's ? No, i don't think so. Why is it that more than 1000 of them say there is not a possible chance of the WTC buildings falling like that from fire... infact they are the first sky scrapers in history to fall by fire "LMFAO" Also do basic physics and you will see for yourself. Can i ask you a question... Why are you so dumb you can't see it ? and FYI explosive residue was found.
nice try dude but we have heard testimonies from demolition EXPERTS who agree that the 9/11 buildings were brought down by controlled demolition using far more sophisticated techniques than the one shown here. sorry but ill take their word for it over yours any day.
@juiceforjoe the towers were also alot taller brain pancake oh! please did you ever study gravity in school the towers picked up speed as they came down and that just don't happen other then on the simpsons the floors below would of slowed the fall not speed they came down at free fall speed no resistance and pulverize concrete and bend steel the way it did wake up ! im not a genius maybe im wrong but i know in my heart and weighing the evidence it didn't happen the way we were told
@juiceforjoe Scientific journal published an article on scientists finding ureacted thermite i the world trade center dust samples. These were conventional explosives in this video. wtc was military grade
@juiceforjoe I see what your saying about it not looking the same, but you have to take into consideration in this scenario there wasnt any hiding of the explosives, it was planned as expected for the demolition. Where you have to look at is the explosion that popped at the bottom was same as 9/11. The free fall was same as 9/11. If each floor was to collapse there would be a slight delay , but nothing.
Well guys theres another new video of building 7. We've seen the collapse but from far away. This one is up close and you can see and hear the charges going off and you most definitely know it was a controlled demolition. Go to New Footage WTC Building #7 Demolished: Is this for real? This video will put every debunker in their place. Do all you debunkers feel stupid yet?
@juiceforjoe only WTC7 was demolitioned, there wasn't enough extensive damage for a 18 year old building to come down like that, and in an interview Larry Silverstein says "we gave the order to pull, and then we watched the building come down"
@YTPEXPERT wtc 7 was a demo every 1 knows that, it's clear as day and like you say even larry silverstein said in an interview he said pull it.. The problem here is that a buidling that size takes weeks to rig and no one even sore teams or demolition teams rigging the building that day.. This means wtc 7 was rigged before september 11th thats what people talk about. And of course you than have to ask your self is it then possible that wtc 1 and 2 were pre rigged also.
all you guys who think 9/11 was a controlled demolition have been watching too much zeitgeist and smoking too much weed. a building takes weeks of prep work to demolish. I mean round the clock heavy work. to demolish a building so big it would have taken hundreds of workers to drill through dozens of pillars with heavy machinery for MONTHS. I don't know about you but I didn't hear anthing in the papers prior saying hey, the wtc is being demolished. C'mon folks, be serious.
for all the people who say oh this is how WTC 7 went down yeah except as you can tell if WTC 7 was just like that then it would have been pretty much just as loud but it wasnt
This is nothing like how the twin towers fell. They collapsed from the top down, demolitions are done from the bottom up thus resulting in an implosion. And as for Tower 7, that steel was not the best as at the time, New York was bankrupted and was cutting corners in the WTC project like not completing fire proofing or buying the best steel. An uncontolled fire raging in a tower without intervention and plenty of air= an inevitable collapse.
@EntertaningAmerica So you're telling us that ALL of the other buildings directly adjacent to wtc 1&2 managed to be engulfed in flames, sustain extremely heavy damage from 2!!!! gigantic skyscraper debris, still stood after all of that (and had to be torn down piece by piece afterwards) but wtc 7 which had a MINOR fire sustained a catastrophic failure and complete collapse?
@mayhemnmischief WTC7 had large fires on every floor caused by a 50 tonne piece of debris from WTC1 smashing it at terminal velocity. The other buildings had a different structure to WTC7 and were not hit in such critical areas as WTC7.
@MazJax thank you! someone with a brain. plus there were numerous diesel tanks that fueled the fires and weakened the already unstable, poorly designed trusses. the north tower fell on top of it. when ANY building losses key structural supports or they are weakened, gravity does the rest and it fall. when it falls it looks like any other building that falls
@EntertaningAmerica so your saying they cut corners on the building that housed the mayor of New York Cities bunker on the 23 floor? haha that's funny!
@furvert23 I'm pretty sure the tallest ever demolished is the Hudson Building.
WTC 1 and 2 came down as a result of massive, unprotected fires caused by plane impacts and burning office equipment, and the weakening of the steel floor trusses which held the core and the facade together. WTC7 was hit by a 50 tonne piece of debris from WTC1, and the ensuing fires caused the mechanical penthouse on the roof to collapse, destroying most of the core columns, therefore causing the building to fall.
@furvert23 I'm pretty sure the tallest ever demolished is the Hudson Building.
WTC 1 and 2 came down as a result of massive, unprotected fires caused by plane impacts and burning office equipment, and the weakening of the steel floor trusses which held the core and the facade together. WTC7 was hit by a 50 tonne piece of debris from WTC1, and the ensuing fires caused the mechanical penthouse on the roof to collapse, destroying most of the core columns, therefore causing the building to fall
Must of taken like a week to rig that building. Shame they didn't read the official 9/11 report or they would of known to just start a fire on 1 of the floors and it would have fallen just the same ;)
@galaxything Maybe if they destroyed all the fireproofing on 3 or more floors, set massive fires burning unprotected, and then destroyed many core and facade colums and floor trusses, using a plane then it would be easier.
@cloudsifter11 haha no. you cant sneak a controlled demolition into the worlds largest office building. it take months of preparation. weakening structural supports clearing the building setting charges running det cord. come on. no explosions like that were heard. controlled demos collapse at the bottom. twin towers collapsed at the top WHERE THE DAMAGE WAS. look at facts and evidence. don't be naive
@crosshairs3 Oh really? Did you know that months prior to this the building underwent a complete maintenance evaluation? Did you also know that the company had ties to NIST? Would it further interest you that the contractor overseeing said maintenance was related to George Bush? Could you happen to explain to me how the core of the buildings evaporated into dust? Aside from these 3 buildings, please name me even 1 other building to collapse due to fire?
@mayhemnmischief yeah maintenance isn't pre demolition work. no way in hell they could do all the work necessary for a controlled demo and then open it back up for business. yet again naive thinking. what ripp apart the building weaken supports set charges close it back up and pray no one notices or that a charge dosent go off . the maintenance lasted less than a week. impossible.. and yes they didn't collapse do to a simple fire... a jet liner carrying plenty of jet fuel crashed into them300mph
@crosshairs3 Wait, so now it's back to the fire theory? You're saying that fire caused total catastrophic collapse of an entire building x2? Whoa. Why didn't they just steal a few oil tankers and blow them up near the base? It's a bit easier than hijacking, then flying commercial jetliners.
@mayhemnmischief they weren't attempting to make the towers collapse dipshit. no one new they would. they were just crashing them into the buildings. an hour of burning jet fuel, office supplies, the paper on dry wall, (yes dry wall burns like hell. the paper not the chalk layer), weakened the 30 year old steel. poor design. plus a huge jet liner at that speed takes out key supports its self. ill send you the link to a video where you can see the floor sag (pulling the outer wall inward) thengiv
@crosshairs3 So back in the 1993 attack, they were just setting off explosions for people to come have 'smores with them? If the fires were so terrible as you claim, how did people manage to escape? How was it that firefighters made it up to the impact floors and report that all they needed were just 2 other firefighters to "knock these pocket fires down?" See, you want it both ways; fires caused it, but fires didn't, jet did but didn't. Make up your mind.
@zelenko2 Lol, so where's the hundreds of explosions then? No explosive sounds have been heard prior to the collapse. Don't you hear the noise in this video? You'll hear it from miles away. The flashes during the collapse of the WTC are most likely created by the glass of the facade. The flashes are too small to be explosions anyway.
@MaxwellEindhoven u see... they did the most effective CD during the collapse so the noise of numerous explosions would be lost inside the collapse sound... u see during the collapse its all messy... a lot of sounds... thats what they played on... chaos
@zelenko2 No I don't. There are to many factors that exclude involvement. I can tell you one thing, I really don't particularly like America, at all, but in this case I seem to be defending it every time. You should get to the basic thing that happened on 9/11. 4 planes were hijacked. It happened in a time it was still possible to bring knifes on a plane. Al-Qaida took advantage of that.
Ask yourself the questions: Would Americans attack their own cities? How many people are involved then?
@MaxwellEindhoven i odnt have to defend... i posted u video which shows it all... watch?v=_i4uS2chQcs&feature=pÂÂÂÂlayer_embedded ... no need to talk from me
@MaxwellEindhoven al qaida was created by cia... those hijackers are alive ... they really hijacked the plane.. but whatch what they did...they were cia agents... for more info to u... /watch?v=KhdppHwUJ9k&feature=channel_video_title
@zelenko2 Just 2000, do you know how many there a re in the US alone? there are more than a million architects and engineers in the US, so 99.8% DOESN'T deny the official story. Now how many architects and engineers are there in the world?
@MaxwellEindhoven only nist supports the official story... all is manipulated.... even cia asset in 2011 told that it was all staged... she admited... do research or just belive what u want... i dont care...ï
That building took an arrow to the 12th floor
jovghu 4 days ago
Can't we just enjoy this video without all the conspiracy crap?
hoboteacher 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"KEEP YOUR EYE ON THAT BUILDING, THAT THING IS COMING DOWN. WE ARE WALKING BACK BECAUSE THE BUILDING IS ABOUT TO BLOW UP", said NYFD seconds before WTC7 collapsed. (YouTube: WTC 7: The Smoking Gun of 9/11)
ethaneros1 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The whole time you're hearing BOMB BOMB BOMB BOMB...I think I know what explosion is...I wanna know what took that building down, IT WASN'T FIRE & CERTAINLY WASN'T A PLANE."
-Craig Bartmer, NYPD officer (YouTube: WTC 7: The Smoking Gun of 9/11)
ethaneros1 2 weeks ago
The Tallest Buildings ever imploded were the Twin Towers on 9/11 = REAL Inside Job
ethaneros1 2 weeks ago
World trade center building #7 was the 3rd to collapse
TheLazyMoney 2 weeks ago
who ever finds the n wins a buck. mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
good luck
jthame24 2 weeks ago
You mean, the third tallest building ever imploded, right?
We all know that the first 2 tallest buildings ever to be imploded were the twin wtc towers...
MrDevlance 1 month ago 2
theres evidence of doctored 9 11 footage..see loose change. Its not difficult to mask the sound of exlosives in footage.
ssike01 1 month ago
Why did I know that the comment section would be filled with 9/11 truthers ranting before clicking on the vid?
ComedyStanCam 1 month ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
@ComedyStanCam Q: "Why did I know that the comment section would be filled with 9/11 truthers ranting before clicking on the vid?"
A: Because the few that are left have nowhere else to go. Everytime a building is imploded or collapses,they will show up. It's sort of a religion.
meemoonses 1 month ago
it WASN'T the second tallest building ever imploded!
i don't know which was the first one,but i know 2 buildings that collapsed same day...9/11...
misju5 1 month ago
tums up if u exspected 9/11
YaBoyBr0wn 2 months ago
Man I get tired of people arguing about 911/WTC.
mlcoo17 2 months ago
fell just like the wtc
ChrisAlexanderVEGAS 2 months ago
Here the whole structure falls at once, after the charges. Each tower in NY begin to collapse where the plane collided. No explosives are to be heard (which doesn't mean there are not explosions, due from a lot of stuff in the towers). As for the thermite... that's just silly. With the common one you need tons of it, not to mention something to keep it in place against the walls, and then you have to ignite it, making a hell of a light show, and that goes for the nano thermite as well.
3civette 2 months ago
@3civette Yes, explosions were heard and seen and also caught by news channels.
The police and firefighters also testified that small explosions and charges were seen and heard.
Pedestrians and the lucky few that escaped also testify to the same.
So I guess they are all liars huh? Freaking idiot...
forgetfuldays 2 months ago
Comment removed
DanSVT03 2 months ago
@forgetfuldays Hey numbnuts, the building was on fire for 8 hours. Two of the largest buildings on earth had just collapsed because they were hit by giant airplanes going 500 miles per hour. Ground zero was an absolute disaster area. Do you think perhaps, these "explosions" came from more realistic sources commonly found inside commercial buildings? If explosives were used, then all cameras would have clearly captured the audio, and not just a few "small explosions" heard by a few witnesses.
DanSVT03 2 months ago
@DanSVT03 hey numbnuts, tell me an instance when fire + steel = explosions. The steel is covered in concrete, so what other "realistic" sources are you speaking of? Unless of course you think concrete can explode when heated. The person who designed the building actually testifies AGAINST that theory, even today.
With all the noise from emergency vehicles, personnel, and a large crowd in disarray, it was easier for the film cameras to capture the visual and not the audio.../sigh...
forgetfuldays 2 months ago
@forgetfuldays If you knew anything about commercial buildings, you would know that they are filled with things like electrical switchgear, HVAC equipment, fuel tanks for generators, emergency backup battery plants (UPS plants) compressed air tanks for pneumatics, compressed gas tanks (propane, oxygen, acetylene) etc etc.
All of which can and will explode violently if damaged or on fire. Ask me how I know all of this...
DanSVT03 2 months ago 2
@forgetfuldays "With all the noise from emergency vehicles, personnel, and a large crowd in disarray, it was easier for the film cameras to capture the visual and not the audio.../sigh..."
So you're saying that the sounds of emergency vehicles and large crowds drowned out the sounds of the necessary amount of explosives needed to demolish two of the worlds largest buildings, plus another 47 story building, even with 50+ cameras pointed at ground zero...
Keep the laughs coming, idiot.
DanSVT03 2 months ago
@DanSVT03 oh wow, you only comment that the audio can't be heard but discount video and the testimony of witness', firefighters and police on the scene? You my friend are one to laugh at.
Anything else?
forgetfuldays 2 months ago
@forgetfuldays What the fuck are you talking about? I just listed a bunch of things that could all cause an explosion inside a building in the event of a fire or if damaged. I'm not arguing that people didn't hear or even saw explosions. I'm arguing that they didn't come from commercial explosives. Show me one bit of proof that there was any type of commercial explosive used on 9/11 and that the explosions witnesses reported did not come from the realistic sources I just listed.
DanSVT03 2 months ago 2
@DanSVT03 Oh and when the building collapsed 8 hours did not pass.../facepalm
forgetfuldays 2 months ago
did anyone saw the plane???
bummwummn 2 months ago
I think the guy in this video thinks that this implosion is unbelievable.
HillBillyNanners 2 months ago
why are there still all of these f%cktards who keep on babbling about 9/11? go back to your gameboys.
shellshok1968 3 months ago
The society Controlled Demolition could be the key in WTC demolitions 911.But they
Used another technic to destroy WTC 1 and 2.More powerful with nano thermite from up to down...
frankito78 3 months ago
@frankito78 yea its called fictional bombs!!!! They never planted them either
pocomedy 2 months ago
Listen to the extreme sound of the charges going off. All the hundreds of videos from New York never picked up anything even remotely similar that, even though most of them were much closer. And don't try saying the government confiscated ALL the films, edited out the noise, then gave them back again.
Kauwhaka 3 months ago 10
@Kauwhaka becuase thermite burns and not explode
bummwummn 2 months ago
@Kauwhaka Ever consider the charges where only in the core? or the basement>?
i dont scream inside job,
i scream independent investigation.
fuvkyougoogification 3 weeks ago
@Kauwhaka Stupid troll, DIE!! There was no way a plane could collapse such a strong building as WTC
Vitalik1Ru 2 weeks ago
that proves that 911 was planned because the twin towers fell veritcally and a bomb or a plane would cause a different type of smoke not a gray colored one.
ak122version 3 months ago
@ak122version moron.
rietveen26 3 months ago
@rietveen26 thankyou
ak122version 3 months ago
Landmark Tower was an inside job!
goldenthroat86 3 months ago 12
Bush hired the same demolition company in 2001 
tattoosbymiami 3 months ago
@tattoosbymiami not funny dude
Dlosch8DRK 3 months ago
@Dlosch8DRK not being funny, just being real.
tattoosbymiami 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch this:
watch?v=2NZtBL1PjMk
bernuga 3 months ago
Imagine if someone had no idea what was going on.
ryanross1995 3 months ago
make that the 4th tallest building imploded because you have too count wtc1,wtc2, and wtc 7 in it to xD
Mr1233556 3 months ago
Comment removed
Gmanster64 3 months ago
@Gmanster64
I know that the three skyscrapers that were each leveled in Manhattan on September 11, 2001 weren't the result of controlled demolition, but do you believe they were all leveled by fire and gravity?
onefodderunit 3 months ago
@Gmanster64 exactly thats what i meant moron
Mr1233556 3 months ago
was this building hit by a plane? looks like 9/11
Steveo1421 3 months ago
@Steveo1421 Sure doesn't sound like it though, right?
runawaymotor 3 months ago
@Steveo1421 No. Its a demolition
Films0R0Us 3 months ago
WHERE THE FUCK is fucking nick devoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogdt
mandkpro 3 months ago
This reminded me of 9/11...
JuniorJFiveTV 3 months ago
@MineCrafterMcFly can you find these videos of it from the inside for me.. i would really like to see them..
kaleigh79 3 months ago
@MineCrafterMcFly that because there was lots of noise that day and the people that had filmed it wasn't that close.. these guys are in clear view and sound of the building.. you can believe the official story if you like.. no one if forcing you not to..
kaleigh79 3 months ago
after this, america spent the next 3 years invading itself over supposed "terrorist attacks"
MrNotch9 3 months ago
@juiceforjoe
Well said. So many morons out there choosing their conclusions first, then going back and trying to shoehorn the facts into place.
kuwinsitall 3 months ago
Heated concreate dust and piles of steel -looks very familiar.
stratocaster539 3 months ago
@juiceforjoe now u smart ass watch this carefully to the end... /watch?v=elYw7MHf7GQ&feature=related
zelenko2 3 months ago
Shut the up about 9/11 and concentrate on this video.
Acceptable76 3 months ago
And the tallest building ever imploded was WTC ? GG Ossama.
Wayzelol 3 months ago
That was caused by Chuck Norris sneezing!
lanier2k5 3 months ago
wow...all this fussing over a video of a building falling?
squidgetpj92 4 months ago
9/11 was bigger
ImAnonymoos 4 months ago
very precise
gippi86 4 months ago
@gippi86
ye, and looks familiar, somehow.. ^^
WuD573f070 2 months ago
what a stupid thing to do!!!!
AmyRose1012 4 months ago
@juiceforjoe THEY USED DIFFERENT EXPLOIVES IN 9/11 RETARD.LOOK UP NANO THERMITE.IT CUTS STEEL BEAMS LIKE A HOT KNIFE TROUGH BUTTER.
sheyon1000 4 months ago
@sheyon1000 No they didn't you retard. You haven't got proof for it either.
MaxwellEindhoven 4 months ago
@sheyon1000 You delusional dork.
Cenamark2 4 months ago
@Cenamark2 unlike u retarded donkey.
sheyon1000 4 months ago
@sheyon1000 I used to be into 911 conspiracy theories. I understand why you are too. Its a good feeling to believe you have secret knowledge that the world leaders want kept from the sheeple, however, I have come to terms with reality and realize 911 conspiracies for the load of bollocks they are.
Cenamark2 4 months ago
@Cenamark2 YEAH BUILDING 7 IS BOLLOCKS TOO.WELL NOT EVERYONE IS THAT NAIVE AND RETARDED LIKE YOUR SELF.
sheyon1000 4 months ago
@Cenamark2 Conspiracy theories are silly enough already, they're even worse coming from Neo-Nazi scumbags. Let me guess "OMG GEWS DID 911!!! DERP!"
Cenamark2 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you are a truth seeker, search "Truth Contest" in Google and click on the 1st result, then open The Present and read what it says. Everyone needs to see this. The Present will turn this world right-side up if it reaches enough people. You will see what I mean when you read the first page.
lifeispresent7 4 months ago
gosh i DO NOT wanna believe that only two planes brought down the twin towers
TyylerLive 4 months ago
@TyylerLive and tower 7? thats unimaginable
choclatesaltyballz 4 months ago
@juiceforjoe heh heh, didn't really think you did =)
peace
jtaforJesus 4 months ago
@juiceforjoe yeah, and that was only 30 stories....no wonder it didn't look anything like the trade towers. If you knew anything about implosions, you would see the trade towers and building 7 were OBVIOUSLY purposely imploded. The whole thing was planned...........disagree if you want....doesn't change my mind.
jtaforJesus 4 months ago
@jtaforJesus
"disagree if you want....doesn't change my mind."
That's exactly how religious people think. Faith conquers all despite the facts. the 9/11 truth movement is just another religion for lost sheep who need a sense of importance in their lives.
SirRobertDole2 4 months ago
@SirRobertDole2 on the contrary, my religious beliefs have nothing at all to do with how I think buildings become a pile of pulverized concrete. If anyone else wants to respond to my comment, just be aware that you will not drag me into this game I've said what I think, just like everyone else has, and I won't be insulted by someone insinuating that I am that stupid. Chow, and have fun with your debates.
peace
jtaforJesus 4 months ago
@jtaforJesus
I wasn't referring to your religious beliefs. Actually, I hadn't even noticed that your name was "jtaforJesus" until after I'd posted that.
What I meant to say was that many 9/11 truthers and conspiracy theorist groups operate like cults or religious fundamentalists in the way that they tend to find only evidence that supports their claim. Anything that might contradict their way of thinking is dismissed as the lies of ignorant "sheep."
SirRobertDole2 4 months ago
@SirRobertDole2 no offense taken. I totally agree with your point, seen in a different light. i've seen it happening all over the internet. Enjoy the rest of the week. And thank you for your clarification =)
peace
jtaforJesus 4 months ago
@juiceforjoe Actually you're correct to a certain extent, BUT in this demolition the explosives were equalized. Notice how the explosives were scattered all over the building, a technique thus causing it to collapse all at once rather than to pancake. The twin towers did pancake but because the technique was different. Instead of scattering explosives they blew out the floors under each other thus causing a "pancake" like collapse. Do som research, don't assume. Ask Questions, Demand Answers.
Cobra0541 4 months ago
islamic extremists woulda blown this up for free
batterycock 4 months ago
I feel bad for those naive enough to trust the government. They ignore history.
AthosAmo 4 months ago 2
*sees title
Please, God. I know I don't ask for much, but please oh please don't let there be a bunch of idiots quarreling over their idiotic 9/11 conspiracy theories.
*sees comments
Well fuck.
DarksporkLeader 4 months ago
@DarksporkLeader well, look at the bright side of it...you can ignore it and go to another video. That's the easiest thing to do ...not trying to be sarcastic
peace
jtaforJesus 4 months ago
Holy freakin jesus
Litterboxer529 4 months ago
lol the title is a lil ironic due to the video being taken from a higher building....
ramllo 4 months ago
u know business is WAR
MrAdamcvesely 4 months ago
one thing i cannot get my brain past,to even leave behind for a moment,is this.Money _is_number_one_period.(.) (?).right?your health,etc.,are all far back seat to money-ok. sorry here it is...IF You can not GUARANTEE (that a building X mass by Y size and above)"somehow"catastrophic failure on the VERTICLE plane,you will find noone 2 insure u.i know this is true.
MrAdamcvesely 4 months ago
Look at these fools trying to convince people WTC was a controlled demo. LMFAO.
Acceptable76 4 months ago
@Acceptable76 So let me guess you are smarter than architects and engineers with batchelor and master degree's ? No, i don't think so. Why is it that more than 1000 of them say there is not a possible chance of the WTC buildings falling like that from fire... infact they are the first sky scrapers in history to fall by fire "LMFAO" Also do basic physics and you will see for yourself. Can i ask you a question... Why are you so dumb you can't see it ? and FYI explosive residue was found.
OwenIVx 4 months ago
@OwenIVx I didn't even bother reading that. My comment wasn't meant for assholes to reply.
Acceptable76 4 months ago
@Acceptable76 How am i being an asshole, i'm stating the facts. Why are you running from it ?
OwenIVx 4 months ago
@juiceforjoe
and dont forget building 7 - the more 'obvious' controlled demolition on the day.
agedchoirboy 4 months ago
@juiceforjoe
nice try dude but we have heard testimonies from demolition EXPERTS who agree that the 9/11 buildings were brought down by controlled demolition using far more sophisticated techniques than the one shown here. sorry but ill take their word for it over yours any day.
agedchoirboy 4 months ago
@juiceforjoe the towers were also alot taller brain pancake oh! please did you ever study gravity in school the towers picked up speed as they came down and that just don't happen other then on the simpsons the floors below would of slowed the fall not speed they came down at free fall speed no resistance and pulverize concrete and bend steel the way it did wake up ! im not a genius maybe im wrong but i know in my heart and weighing the evidence it didn't happen the way we were told
irobot2009able 4 months ago
@juiceforjoe Scientific journal published an article on scientists finding ureacted thermite i the world trade center dust samples. These were conventional explosives in this video. wtc was military grade
thefullmonte2003 4 months ago
Unbelievable.
benjaminhartnett 4 months ago
@juiceforjoe lol cause your a demolition expert?
84typo 4 months ago
@Shitraver negative, you think that cause smoke covered everything. It fell same way.
84typo 4 months ago
@juiceforjoe I see what your saying about it not looking the same, but you have to take into consideration in this scenario there wasnt any hiding of the explosives, it was planned as expected for the demolition. Where you have to look at is the explosion that popped at the bottom was same as 9/11. The free fall was same as 9/11. If each floor was to collapse there would be a slight delay , but nothing.
84typo 4 months ago
@Shitraver He was probably talking about wtc 7 I would imagine.
12OclockLow 4 months ago
Well guys theres another new video of building 7. We've seen the collapse but from far away. This one is up close and you can see and hear the charges going off and you most definitely know it was a controlled demolition. Go to New Footage WTC Building #7 Demolished: Is this for real? This video will put every debunker in their place. Do all you debunkers feel stupid yet?
muttkat 4 months ago
It's not like 9/11. The WTC fell from the top down.
HaloMasterMind117 4 months ago
No one said the towers were.... Building seven is the one that looks like a controlled demo...
george29205 4 months ago
@juiceforjoe only WTC7 was demolitioned, there wasn't enough extensive damage for a 18 year old building to come down like that, and in an interview Larry Silverstein says "we gave the order to pull, and then we watched the building come down"
YTPEXPERT 4 months ago
@YTPEXPERT wtc 7 was a demo every 1 knows that, it's clear as day and like you say even larry silverstein said in an interview he said pull it.. The problem here is that a buidling that size takes weeks to rig and no one even sore teams or demolition teams rigging the building that day.. This means wtc 7 was rigged before september 11th thats what people talk about. And of course you than have to ask your self is it then possible that wtc 1 and 2 were pre rigged also.
galaxything 4 months ago 2
Second? 1st must've been the WTC. Nice vid.
str8out 4 months ago
so many people heard and saw explosions including police firefighters and one was army trained who knew what explosions are like
mrstaffytoots 4 months ago
sounds like 9-11
vivavasquez 4 months ago
looks like 9-11 to me
vivavasquez 4 months ago
that looks just like the twin towers falling !
vivavasquez 4 months ago
WOW! That was sure one fine controlled demolition. Kind of like this one?
watch?v=tVc87i6Dblg
crlwllns 4 months ago
press 9 to haer a bird
balal211 4 months ago
press 9 to haer WOW and a bird
balal211 4 months ago
all you guys who think 9/11 was a controlled demolition have been watching too much zeitgeist and smoking too much weed. a building takes weeks of prep work to demolish. I mean round the clock heavy work. to demolish a building so big it would have taken hundreds of workers to drill through dozens of pillars with heavy machinery for MONTHS. I don't know about you but I didn't hear anthing in the papers prior saying hey, the wtc is being demolished. C'mon folks, be serious.
ReflexiveBeef 4 months ago 2
excellent, did they use Nanothermite ...?
TheSquire007 4 months ago
for all the people who say oh this is how WTC 7 went down yeah except as you can tell if WTC 7 was just like that then it would have been pretty much just as loud but it wasnt
shaunfirebird 4 months ago
this is the BEST proof for the WTC 7 demolition thing ...this is the exact same way that WTC 7 collapsed ...
kokym8 4 months ago
are they al-qaeda?
sukarno1945 4 months ago
are they al-qeada?
sukarno1945 4 months ago
Ohhh. Second tallest building ever to be imploded. Not, second tallest building ever, imploded.
mdoerkse 4 months ago
This is nothing like how the twin towers fell. They collapsed from the top down, demolitions are done from the bottom up thus resulting in an implosion. And as for Tower 7, that steel was not the best as at the time, New York was bankrupted and was cutting corners in the WTC project like not completing fire proofing or buying the best steel. An uncontolled fire raging in a tower without intervention and plenty of air= an inevitable collapse.
EntertaningAmerica 4 months ago
@EntertaningAmerica So you're telling us that ALL of the other buildings directly adjacent to wtc 1&2 managed to be engulfed in flames, sustain extremely heavy damage from 2!!!! gigantic skyscraper debris, still stood after all of that (and had to be torn down piece by piece afterwards) but wtc 7 which had a MINOR fire sustained a catastrophic failure and complete collapse?
mayhemnmischief 4 months ago
@mayhemnmischief WTC7 had large fires on every floor caused by a 50 tonne piece of debris from WTC1 smashing it at terminal velocity. The other buildings had a different structure to WTC7 and were not hit in such critical areas as WTC7.
MazJax 4 months ago
@MazJax thank you! someone with a brain. plus there were numerous diesel tanks that fueled the fires and weakened the already unstable, poorly designed trusses. the north tower fell on top of it. when ANY building losses key structural supports or they are weakened, gravity does the rest and it fall. when it falls it looks like any other building that falls
crosshairs3 4 months ago
@crosshairs3 Exactly.
MazJax 4 months ago
@EntertaningAmerica so your saying they cut corners on the building that housed the mayor of New York Cities bunker on the 23 floor? haha that's funny!
TheLoneStarGamer 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
look at this and look at the collapse of the world trade center and tell me they are not the same thing
shrklvr94 4 months ago
actually, the second tallest building to be imploded would be the south tower. the first tallest would be the north.
furvert23 4 months ago 5
@furvert23 I'm pretty sure the tallest ever demolished is the Hudson Building.
WTC 1 and 2 came down as a result of massive, unprotected fires caused by plane impacts and burning office equipment, and the weakening of the steel floor trusses which held the core and the facade together. WTC7 was hit by a 50 tonne piece of debris from WTC1, and the ensuing fires caused the mechanical penthouse on the roof to collapse, destroying most of the core columns, therefore causing the building to fall.
MazJax 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@furvert23 I'm pretty sure the tallest ever demolished is the Hudson Building.
WTC 1 and 2 came down as a result of massive, unprotected fires caused by plane impacts and burning office equipment, and the weakening of the steel floor trusses which held the core and the facade together. WTC7 was hit by a 50 tonne piece of debris from WTC1, and the ensuing fires caused the mechanical penthouse on the roof to collapse, destroying most of the core columns, therefore causing the building to fall
MazJax 4 months ago
@furvert23 Look up the Hudson Department Store, that was the tallest ever demolished.
MazJax 4 months ago
@furvert23 Shut up you idiot.
MaxwellEindhoven 4 months ago
A perfect demo!
oldfart387 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
next time just ignite jet fuel at the top of the building, and get the same results. Remember 9-11.
becfinch 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
next time just ignite jet fuel at the top of the building, and get the same results. Remember 9-11.
becfinch 4 months ago
next time just ignite jet fuel at the top of the building, and get the same results. Remember 9-11.
becfinch 4 months ago
HMMMM, Check out a documentary called loose change.
WavyGravyTrain1 4 months ago
nine eleven likes :)
belsondaniel 4 months ago 4
Must of taken like a week to rig that building. Shame they didn't read the official 9/11 report or they would of known to just start a fire on 1 of the floors and it would have fallen just the same ;)
galaxything 4 months ago 3
@galaxything Maybe if they destroyed all the fireproofing on 3 or more floors, set massive fires burning unprotected, and then destroyed many core and facade colums and floor trusses, using a plane then it would be easier.
MazJax 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
same company that did 911
mtruthnow 4 months ago
Just like on 911, WOW!
cloudsifter11 4 months ago 24
@cloudsifter11 Yeah, They Sent People Like That To Plant Explosives Inside The Building. The Airplanes Were Just A Distraction
#9/11 Was An Inside Job.
MrWeezyxD 4 months ago 3
@cloudsifter11 haha no. you cant sneak a controlled demolition into the worlds largest office building. it take months of preparation. weakening structural supports clearing the building setting charges running det cord. come on. no explosions like that were heard. controlled demos collapse at the bottom. twin towers collapsed at the top WHERE THE DAMAGE WAS. look at facts and evidence. don't be naive
crosshairs3 4 months ago
@crosshairs3 Oh really? Did you know that months prior to this the building underwent a complete maintenance evaluation? Did you also know that the company had ties to NIST? Would it further interest you that the contractor overseeing said maintenance was related to George Bush? Could you happen to explain to me how the core of the buildings evaporated into dust? Aside from these 3 buildings, please name me even 1 other building to collapse due to fire?
mayhemnmischief 4 months ago
@mayhemnmischief yeah maintenance isn't pre demolition work. no way in hell they could do all the work necessary for a controlled demo and then open it back up for business. yet again naive thinking. what ripp apart the building weaken supports set charges close it back up and pray no one notices or that a charge dosent go off . the maintenance lasted less than a week. impossible.. and yes they didn't collapse do to a simple fire... a jet liner carrying plenty of jet fuel crashed into them300mph
crosshairs3 4 months ago
@crosshairs3 Wait, so now it's back to the fire theory? You're saying that fire caused total catastrophic collapse of an entire building x2? Whoa. Why didn't they just steal a few oil tankers and blow them up near the base? It's a bit easier than hijacking, then flying commercial jetliners.
mayhemnmischief 4 months ago
@mayhemnmischief they weren't attempting to make the towers collapse dipshit. no one new they would. they were just crashing them into the buildings. an hour of burning jet fuel, office supplies, the paper on dry wall, (yes dry wall burns like hell. the paper not the chalk layer), weakened the 30 year old steel. poor design. plus a huge jet liner at that speed takes out key supports its self. ill send you the link to a video where you can see the floor sag (pulling the outer wall inward) thengiv
crosshairs3 4 months ago
@crosshairs3 So back in the 1993 attack, they were just setting off explosions for people to come have 'smores with them? If the fires were so terrible as you claim, how did people manage to escape? How was it that firefighters made it up to the impact floors and report that all they needed were just 2 other firefighters to "knock these pocket fires down?" See, you want it both ways; fires caused it, but fires didn't, jet did but didn't. Make up your mind.
mayhemnmischief 4 months ago
@cloudsifter11 Absolutely NOTHING LIKE 9/11, WOW!
MaxwellEindhoven 4 months ago 10
@MaxwellEindhoven wow blind as a bat
84typo 4 months ago
@84typo If you think it's the same as 9/11 then yes indeed, you're as blind as a bat.
MaxwellEindhoven 4 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven IKR
antmanster111 4 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven /watch?v=elYw7MHf7GQ&feature=related
zelenko2 3 months ago
@zelenko2 Is that all you can do, post a link of a video?
MaxwellEindhoven 3 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven whta else do u need.. a limonade?... that video tells it all... flashes
zelenko2 3 months ago
@zelenko2 Lol, so where's the hundreds of explosions then? No explosive sounds have been heard prior to the collapse. Don't you hear the noise in this video? You'll hear it from miles away. The flashes during the collapse of the WTC are most likely created by the glass of the facade. The flashes are too small to be explosions anyway.
MaxwellEindhoven 3 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven too small to be explosions?... hahahahahaahahahah... watch CD on youtube
zelenko2 3 months ago
@zelenko2 Well, comment on the audio part too then.
MaxwellEindhoven 3 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven u see... they did the most effective CD during the collapse so the noise of numerous explosions would be lost inside the collapse sound... u see during the collapse its all messy... a lot of sounds... thats what they played on... chaos
zelenko2 3 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven no need for me to talk any more... this should explain all /watch?v=_i4uS2chQcs&feature=pÂÂÂlayer_embedded
zelenko2 3 months ago
@zelenko2 Why are you only able to argue with YouTube links? Can't you explain what your opinion is on that topic?
MaxwellEindhoven 3 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven do u belive 911 was staged by usa?
zelenko2 3 months ago
@zelenko2 No I don't. There are to many factors that exclude involvement. I can tell you one thing, I really don't particularly like America, at all, but in this case I seem to be defending it every time. You should get to the basic thing that happened on 9/11. 4 planes were hijacked. It happened in a time it was still possible to bring knifes on a plane. Al-Qaida took advantage of that.
Ask yourself the questions: Would Americans attack their own cities? How many people are involved then?
MaxwellEindhoven 3 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven well apparently u dont know nothing about it... dont post anything more cous i wont reply u anymore until u do research...
zelenko2 3 months ago
@zelenko2 Well, then come with a decent argument. You seem to be the "know-it-all" but I haven't seen a single argument that defends your claim.
MaxwellEindhoven 3 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven i odnt have to defend... i posted u video which shows it all... watch?v=_i4uS2chQcs&feature=pÂÂÂÂlayer_embedded ... no need to talk from me
zelenko2 3 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven al qaida was created by cia... those hijackers are alive ... they really hijacked the plane.. but whatch what they did...they were cia agents... for more info to u... /watch?v=KhdppHwUJ9k&feature=channel_video_title
zelenko2 3 months ago
@zelenko2 Oh please, you've got no proof for that, just rumors. The video in the link is also nonsense. Please come with a decent argument.
MaxwellEindhoven 3 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven man buildings should have not colapsed... no way... more than 2000 architects and engeneers deny official story...
zelenko2 3 months ago
@zelenko2 Just 2000, do you know how many there a re in the US alone? there are more than a million architects and engineers in the US, so 99.8% DOESN'T deny the official story. Now how many architects and engineers are there in the world?
MaxwellEindhoven 3 months ago
@MaxwellEindhoven only nist supports the official story... all is manipulated.... even cia asset in 2011 told that it was all staged... she admited... do research or just belive what u want... i dont care...ï